Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Family court specialist report writers; opinions and issues, K McCormick

917

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
917
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Family Court Specialist Report Writers: Opinions and Issues Assessing the current practice of psychologists working in the Family Court
  • 2. Background <ul><li>Development of updated guidelines because: </li></ul><ul><li>Changes in legislation </li></ul><ul><li>New Practice Note </li></ul><ul><li>Case law (e.g., K v. K) </li></ul>
  • 3. Purposes of Guidelines <ul><li>Standardize practice/minimal standards </li></ul><ul><li>Use in training and supervision </li></ul><ul><li>Assist in communications with other professional groups (e.g., Judges about briefs, LFC regarding “wishes of children”) </li></ul><ul><li>Set expectations of how we relate within our profession (e.g., critiques) </li></ul>
  • 4. Process for Consultation <ul><li>Considered questionnaire, focus groups, but decided on interviews with a smaller group because: </li></ul><ul><li>Availability of summer studentship </li></ul><ul><li>Efficiency </li></ul><ul><li>Desire to gain access to detailed reports </li></ul>
  • 5. Aim <ul><li>To gather information and opinions from practicing Family Court report writers. </li></ul><ul><li>To use this information in the revision of the guidelines for specialist report writers of the New Zealand Family Courts. </li></ul>
  • 6. Method <ul><li>Unstructured face-to-face and phone interviews were conducted with 14 experienced New Zealand report writers. </li></ul><ul><li>Writers were identified by Professor Fred Seymour and Dr Suzanne Blackwell. </li></ul>
  • 7. Participants <ul><li>10 x female and 4 x male </li></ul><ul><li>11 clinical psychologists </li></ul><ul><li>2 educational psychologists </li></ul><ul><li>1 trained in educational psychology then re-trained in clinical psychology </li></ul><ul><li>From all over New Zealand, including Masterton, Auckland, Rotorua, Nelson, Wellington, Canterbury and Invercargill </li></ul><ul><li>Experience ranged from 3 to 28 years </li></ul>
  • 8. Interview Schedule <ul><li>Questions covered: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Current practice, the Care of Children Act 2004 and use of the guidelines. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conducting interviews. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conducting observations. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The court hearing. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Critiques (second opinions). </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Payment issues. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Culture. </li></ul></ul>
  • 9. Data Analysis <ul><li>Notes were taken and typed immediately after each interview. </li></ul><ul><li>Data was merged into one document. </li></ul><ul><li>Data were coded on the computer using different colours to separate each point. </li></ul><ul><li>Common issues and opinions were identified. </li></ul>
  • 10. Analysis of the Data <ul><li>Three broad areas were identified, each of which contained particular issues of concern for report writers. </li></ul><ul><li>These concerned: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interactions with the family. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interactions with the Family Court and related practitioners. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interactions with other psychologists or professionals. </li></ul></ul>
  • 11. <ul><li>Interaction Issues of the interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with the *Building rapport through interviews and Family. observations. </li></ul><ul><li>*Children’s wishes and rights. </li></ul><ul><li>*Collateral interviews: Importance of balance. </li></ul><ul><li>*Observations: Natural verses structured and psychometrics. </li></ul><ul><li>*Note taking: The juggling act. </li></ul><ul><li>*Cultural issues: the use of cultural advisors, interpreters and support during children’s interviews. </li></ul>
  • 12. <ul><li>Interaction Issues of the interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with the *Interactions with Lawyer for Child: Independence Courts. from and the need for some communication. </li></ul><ul><li>*The varying standards of briefs. </li></ul><ul><li>*Variations in report structure. </li></ul><ul><li>*Judges/courts role. </li></ul>
  • 13. <ul><li>Interaction Issues of the interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions between *Growing a culture of respect between report Psychologists. writers. </li></ul><ul><li>*The positives and negatives of being critiqued. </li></ul><ul><li>*The education and mentoring of new report writers. </li></ul><ul><li>*Continued education and access to current literature. </li></ul>
  • 14. Back to the guidelines <ul><li>The input of participants has given some useful indication of the practice of some practitioners, and of the issues of relevance to them </li></ul><ul><li>This in turn has informed the ambit and detail of the new guidelines both for Family Court assessments and critiques </li></ul><ul><li>These guidelines will be discussed in some detail in the Family Law Symposium tomorrow </li></ul>
  • 15. Thank You

×