Models and simulations of thegrowth of carbon nanotubesShaun Hendy
Carbon nanotubes• Carbon nanotubes are one of the most important  nanomaterials                                           ...
Growth of carbon nanotubes• Growth by Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) uses a  metal particle catalyst (e.g. Fe or Ni).   ...
Catalyst size vs. tube size                     Fe catalysts, unsupported growth                     r                    ...
Focus on cap• Geometrically, there is a 1:1 relationship  between the cap structure and the tube  chirality• Hypothesis: C...
CNT growth outcomes• Cap lift-off (SWNT?)• Catalyst withdrawal (MWNT?)                         Yoshida et al, Nano Lett., ...
Metal particles in CNTs                                   Tsang et al, Nature 372, 159 (1994)Hsu et al, Thin Solid Films47...
Absorption of droplets                                 Simulation shows Pd droplet                                 with c=...
Theory of absorption                                           Co has θc = 140° rt/rd =                                   ...
Nanopipettery• We can continue to fill tube by adding small droplets:• We can also evacuate a tube by immersing it in a dr...
Implications for CNT growth• Capillary absorption places upper bound on radius of  tube that can be grown from catalyst pa...
Energetics of graphitic cap• Construct a simple expression model for CNT-catalyst  energy assuming spheres and spherical c...
Is lift-off trivial?• Ni-C, R = 0.5 nm, re = 0, Lc                0.5 nm        3.1 nm                                   w...
Reduced model• Set =0 and use rigid catalyst approximation                                          2                     ...
MD experiments                                  • Cap is slowly                                    stretched on uniform   ...
MD experiments• Simple model can be adjusted to fit MD simulations• Simulations reveal importance of cap geometry and edge...
MD experiments• Other cap geometries:         (9,0)                   Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
Conclusions• Lift-off is a non-trivial process in CNT growth: catalyst-  graphite contact angle is a key parameter• These ...
Acknowledgements• Coworkers:   – Aruna Awasthi, Nicola Gaston,     Dmitri Schebarchov,     Nagesh Longanathan• Collaborato...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

12.45 o14 s hendy

479 views

Published on

Research 14: S Hendy

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
479
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

12.45 o14 s hendy

  1. 1. Models and simulations of thegrowth of carbon nanotubesShaun Hendy
  2. 2. Carbon nanotubes• Carbon nanotubes are one of the most important nanomaterials Source: Intel• For applications, one would like to be able to grow CNTs of specific chiralities and diameters (which control the band gap), in place, in devices.
  3. 3. Growth of carbon nanotubes• Growth by Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) uses a metal particle catalyst (e.g. Fe or Ni). Amara et al, PRL 100, 056105 (2008)• In small catalyst particles (<5nm) cap nucleates and then lifts off, resulting in growth of single wall tube.• Simulating CNT growth is challenging due to timescales involved – limited success so far.
  4. 4. Catalyst size vs. tube size Fe catalysts, unsupported growth r 1 .6 rt Nasibulin et al, Carbon 43 2251 (2005)
  5. 5. Focus on cap• Geometrically, there is a 1:1 relationship between the cap structure and the tube chirality• Hypothesis: CNT cap controls CNT chirality (Reich et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 421, 469 (2006))• If we can understand formation of cap and transition to tube growth, we may learn how to control chirality
  6. 6. CNT growth outcomes• Cap lift-off (SWNT?)• Catalyst withdrawal (MWNT?) Yoshida et al, Nano Lett., 8, 2082–2086 (2008)
  7. 7. Metal particles in CNTs Tsang et al, Nature 372, 159 (1994)Hsu et al, Thin Solid Films471, 140 (2005) Question: How are metal catalyst particles being drawn into carbon nanotubes? Metal c Capillary forces? Ag 124o Cu 120o Ni-C 145o Co 140o
  8. 8. Absorption of droplets Simulation shows Pd droplet with c=120o If the droplets are sufficiently small: cos c 1 0 rt r they are be driven in by the Laplace pressure associated with their surface tension. Schebarchov and SCH, Nano Letters 8 2253 – 2257 (2008)
  9. 9. Theory of absorption Co has θc = 140° rt/rd = 0.45 < 0.77 Edgar, Hendy et al, Small (2011) Schebarchov and Hendy, Nanoscale 3, 134 (2011)
  10. 10. Nanopipettery• We can continue to fill tube by adding small droplets:• We can also evacuate a tube by immersing it in a droplet larger than the critical size threshold Edgar, Hendy, Schebarchov and Tilley, Small 7, 737–774 (2011)
  11. 11. Implications for CNT growth• Capillary absorption places upper bound on radius of tube that can be grown from catalyst particle: rt r cos c e.g. c = 130o so r 1.6rt• Just consistent with Nasibulin et al (2005) as Fe3C has c = 140o i.e. r 1.3rt to avoid absorption• Surface tension and adhesive forces are close to being in balance
  12. 12. Energetics of graphitic cap• Construct a simple expression model for CNT-catalyst energy assuming spheres and spherical caps R re r h a 2 1 1 E wA 2 a 2 A r rer = radius of curvature of cap, A is area of cap = line tension due to dangling or metal-carbon bonds = elastic curvature modulus of capw= adhesion energy Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
  13. 13. Is lift-off trivial?• Ni-C, R = 0.5 nm, re = 0, Lc 0.5 nm 3.1 nm w w E (eV) h Collapsed cap stable R (A) c=90 o c=140 o R Lifted cap stable R (A)• Lift-off stable only for range of catalyst sizes
  14. 14. Reduced model• Set =0 and use rigid catalyst approximation 2 1 1 E wA 2 A r re
  15. 15. MD experiments • Cap is slowly stretched on uniform catalyst particle • Lift-off occurs for some Rcrit that can be compared with the reduced model Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
  16. 16. MD experiments• Simple model can be adjusted to fit MD simulations• Simulations reveal importance of cap geometry and edge termination Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
  17. 17. MD experiments• Other cap geometries: (9,0) Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
  18. 18. Conclusions• Lift-off is a non-trivial process in CNT growth: catalyst- graphite contact angle is a key parameter• These ideas are consistent with the experimental correlation between catalyst size and tube size• Cap geometry is also important for details of lift-off process; possible that chirality could be controlled Schebarchov, Hendy, Erterkin and Grossman PRL (2011)
  19. 19. Acknowledgements• Coworkers: – Aruna Awasthi, Nicola Gaston, Dmitri Schebarchov, Nagesh Longanathan• Collaborators: – Theory: Barry Cox (Wollongong), Elif Erterkin (UC Berkeley), Jeff Grossman (MIT) – Experiments: Richard Tilley & Kirsten Edgar (VUW)

×