• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Minnesota GIS
 
  • 1,182 views

DESTINATION & POINT OF BEGINNING?

DESTINATION & POINT OF BEGINNING?
GIS Reaches Enterprise Status in Minnesota

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,182
Views on SlideShare
1,181
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.slideshare.net 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Minnesota GIS Minnesota GIS Presentation Transcript

    • NATIONAL STATES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION COUNCIL DESTINATION & POINT OF BEGINNING? GIS Reaches Enterprise Status in Minnesota
      • Developed over years with community input
      • Many setbacks along the way
      • Supported by CIO and 3 commissioner sponsors
      • Proposed as Governor reform initiative
      • Legislation sponsored by legislative leaders
      • Created by legislative action
      • Followed up with continued engagement
      News Flash: May 16, 2009 Minnesota Legislature Creates Geospatial Information Office
    • The Journey: Pack a Lunch!
      • 1978: LMIC established – 1st state GIS program in nation?
      • 1990: First Strategic Plan for State GIS (PlanGraphics)
      • 1991: Executive Order creates Governor’s Council on GI
      • 2004: Second Strategic Plan for State GIS (GCGI)
      • 2006: FGDC CAP 50 States grant
      • 2007: Compass Points retreat recommends priorities
      • 2008: Enterprise GIS adopted as DTE Subcabinet initiative
      • 2009: MGIO authorized by legislation
      The Journey: Pack a Lunch!
    • 2008
      • GIS cost to government:
        • Conservatively: $12,564,000 /yr
      • Thus, 10% efficiency would yield >$1M/yr. savings
      At our first meeting, the State CIO, Gopal Khana asked: “What is the GIS cost to government?” So we figured it out (approximately).
    • 1 If we had an organization that did state government-wide, enterprise GIS coordination, what would it look like? We built a job description. Job Description for a Minnesota Geospatial Coordination Entity 3 major activities; 8 program elements Geospatial Coordination Technical Infrastructure Technical Support Coordination, Outreach, Communication Intra-government (agencies) Inter-government (Counties, Feds) Extra-government Data Coordination Data gaps Data Standards Data stewardship Aggregation of 3 rd party data Enterprise licensing Technology Coordination Project & procurement review Agency-based enterprise resources New enterprise technologies Data Services Deployment of an Enterprise Data Library Web Services Map services (OGC) Capability services (geocode) Training Formal, technical Guidance Mentoring Best practices Consulting & Project Support In-source vs. outsource
    • When GIS utilization continues to grow, how do you build an economic business case? Cost avoidance. 41
      • Cost Avoidance Assumptions:
      • 10% /year current GIS cost growth rate
      • 5% /year after MnGEO implementation
      • $2.2M funding increase for MnGEO
      • Yields net $10.1M savings over 10 years
      • Reducing the Cost of GIS
      • Improved coordination
      • Reduced duplication of effort
      • More efficient data storage/management
      • More effective software licensing
      • Shared web applications and services
      • Coordinated data acquisition, collection and compilation
      • Common data distribution portal
      • Communal strategic investments in data/technology
    • Everybody’s watching, expectations are high, we’ve got one shot to make this work. What are the risks? 39
      • Perceptions of insufficient transformation
        • This must be more than re-branding
      • Loss of agency GIS program support
        • Continue transparency and active outreach to agencies
        • Especially larger agencies w/ enterprise programs: DOT, DNR, PCA (they have the least to gain)
        • Missing the unique timing of the Drive to Excellence initiative
        • Inadequate funding
        • Insufficient support for cross agency activities
        • Inadequate performance of shared services and resources
      • Priorities Match priorities to legislative mandate.
      • Operational Evaluate existing services and make needed adjustments.
      • Organizational Evaluate capacities and make needed adjustments.
      • Resources Focus limited resources on high priorities and pursue options to fill the “resource gaps.”
      • Partnerships Identify strategic partnerships and work hard to make them work .
      MnGeo’s Challenging Journey Ahead
    • MnGeo’s MISSION Improve services statewide through the C oordinated, A ffordable, R eliable, and E ffective use of GIS. Coordinated Affordable Reliable Effective GIS
    • Chief Information Officer Office of Enterprise Technology Commissioner Department of Administration
    • MnGeo Organization Funding 5.5 FTE – Geo 0.5 FTE – Admin 1.0 FTE -- IT
    • The Journey: Pack a Lunch!
      • Legislative awareness and support
      • Access to commissioners/cabinet
      • Invitations to advise agencies on their business.
        • Stimulus Funding/State Investments (Finance)
        • Broadband (Commerce)
        • Public Safety, Transportation, Economic Development, Corrections
      • Agency contributions to enterprise data and service initiatives
      The Journey: Worth the Trip!
    • Key Reminder! Respect and Involve Your Stakeholders
    • For More Information
      • About the Minnesota Experience
      • http://www.gis.state.mn.us/committee/MSDI/dte.htm
      • David Arbeit – [email_address]
      • Michael Terner – [email_address]