Regional Partnerships and Approaches to Farm to Institution - presentation

199 views
160 views

Published on

Regional Partnerships and Approaches to Farm to Institution

Presenter: Peter Allison

Published in: Travel, Sports
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
199
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • CT - spends more on DoD Fresh than all other 6 states togetherMA – Coordinated procurement program addresses multiple sectorsRI - FTS in all school districts/ RI GAP makes it easier for institutions to buy from local growersNH – strong research and program base at UNH VT and ME strong and diverse network of FTS leaders
  • Regional Partnerships and Approaches to Farm to Institution - presentation

    1. 1. Regional Partnerships andApproaches to Farm to Institution Peter Allison, Farm to Institution New England (FINE)  peter@farmtoinstitution.org; 802.436.4067 Kelly Erwin, Massachusetts Farm to School Program/ RSC Member for Northeast FTS Steering Committee  kea@massfarmtoschool.org; 413-253-3844 Christine James, John Merck Fund  cjames@jmfund.org; 617-556-4120 Kathy Lawrence, School Food FOCUS  klawrence@schoolfoodfocus.org; 914.708.7053 Vanessa Herald, UW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems/ RLA- Great Lakes Region of the National Farm to School Network  vherald@wisc.edu; 608.263.6064
    2. 2. What is one issue related to partnerships and collaboration that you wantto talk about today?
    3. 3. FARM TO INSTITUTION NEW ENGLAND (FINE) www.FarmToInstitution.org
    4. 4. Collective Impact Large-scale social change requires broad cross- sector coordination, yet the social sector remains focused on the isolated intervention of individual organizations.Collective Impact: By John Kania & Mark Kramer, published in Stanford Social Innovation Review,Winter 2011http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
    5. 5. FINE - Overview Six-state collaboration working to strengthen our regional food system by increasing the demand and use of New England food by New England institutions Initiated by the National Farm to School Network (Northeast Regional Steering Committee) with strong support from the six New England Chief Agriculture Officers Base of engaged funders – USDA-RD, John Merck Fund, Kendall Foundation, and others Expanding partnership to include change agents in hospitals, colleges, corporations, and agencies Effective involvement by government entities
    6. 6. FINE Structure Leadership Team Coordinator Fiscal Sponsor Workgroup Leaders Project Leaders Community of Practice/Learning Communities
    7. 7. Overview of FINE ProjectsSupply Chain Focus Cross-Cutting Strategies Distribution  Identify barriers  Conduct pilot projects and Processing research Procurement  Support state projects and Scratch Cooking networks  Convene partners & Product Focus: Beef to learning communities Institution  Recommend policy change  Measure progress  Share information www.FarmToInstitution.org
    8. 8. Why focus on institutions? Logical outgrowth of FTS efforts Institutions have lots of consumers – In New England:  2.16 million K-12 students ($150 million school food purchases)  900 thousand college and university students and staff  43 thousand people hospital staff Institutions are stable Institutions are visible to current and future leaders
    9. 9. Why focus on a regionalapproach? There is a New England regional identity Producers and consumers are split geographically  MA has 50% of population  VT raises 50% of dairy and beef  ME has 50% of acres of berries and
    10. 10. Why focus regionally? Each state has unique assets to share with the others Food system companies cross state lines  Producers, distributors, food service companies Potentially greater policy influence
    11. 11. What is challenging? It’s a big place and people are busy – hard to get together in person and to keep up States do have their own agendas, structures and identity Real and perceived competition between partners and region for:  Dollars  Leadership and credit  Time and attention of leaders The existential questions: Who we are – Who is a partner? What does that mean?
    12. 12. Where are we heading?  Expand and clearly define partner base  Develop targeted measurement strategies  Create a more advanced and integrated communication system  Continue pilot and research projects  Convene regional communities of practice/ learning communities  Support our state programs and networks that support the regional collaboration

    ×