AGENDA• The Situation• Approach• Projects• Funding• Contract Execution
ENERGY USE AND GROWTH $43,075,000 $43,227,000 $43,360,000 $40,505,000 47% $35,300,000 ENERGY COST$29,348,000 3,178,000 MBTU 3,181,000 MBTU 3,075,000 MBTU 3%3,093,120 MBTU 2,666,000 CONSUMPTION MBTU 2,624,000 MBTU 151,312 144,666 23% 144,467 POPULATION 135,895 141,225 116,963 31M sf 35% 27M sf *RP – RCI & FACILITIES 24M sf 24M sf 26M sf Reimbursable 23M sf 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
A SNAPSHOT: ENERGY PORTFOLIO Fort Bragg Energy Portfolio lays out our vision by answering the questions: • Where are we? (current status) • Where do we want to go? (vision) • How we will get there? (plan) • How much it will cost? (resource requirements) email@example.com
ENERGY PROGRAM GOALS & OBJECTIVESGoal: Transition to reliable and secure renewable energy while aggressively reducing overall demand. • Objective 1: Eliminate energy inefficiencies that waste natural and financial resources in existing facilities using FY2003 as a baseline (kwh/sqft). “How you use it” • Objective 2: Increase energy efficiency in renovation and new construction. “How you construct it” • Objective 3: Reduce dependency on fossil fuel and increase the use of clean renewable energy. “How we get it” • Objective 4: Improve surety and reliability of energy systems to provide dependable utility services. “How you protect it”
PLANNING FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY FORT BRAGG REGULATIONMILCONData fromotherInstallations http://armysolutions.net/IDG/pdf/EnergyProgram.pdf Challenge Solution Results
BUILDING OPERATION COMMAND CENTER (BOCC) UTILITY MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (UMCS)No centralized system Master Plan Expanding the system = Saving energy ($$$) Challenge Solution Results
RETROCOMMISSIONING (RCx) “30,000 mile tune up” - has to become a standard & recurring practice• Fort Bragg began retro-commissioning (RCx) in 2010• 300+ buildings currently undergoing RCx 25% Expected• Over 600 deficiencies were found during RCx annual energy savings for barracks and 65%• *Protects the Army’s significant construction investment for admin spaces 8
ENERGY EFFICIENCY = ENERGY SECURITY CENTRAL ENERGY PLANTS Utility Modernization Program Central Plant Upgrades Ft. Bragg Central Plants 11 Industrial boilers replaced •7 major plants 4 Chillers replaced •Serve over 8MSF of buildings Upsized HW/CW lines •466 MMBTU’s of heating Updated and automated controls •23,207 Tons of cooling Ground Source Heat Pump Central Plant •Backbone of heating/cooling in Historical District for barracks & admin spaces Black Start added for Energy Security Thermal Energy Storage Electrical demand reduced up to 2,400 kW 2.2 M gallon storage at 82nd Plant Three additional TES facilities planned (2.5MGL, 1.2MGL, 1.2MGL) $225,000 energy cost avoided in FY11 (less than 9 year payback)
ENERGY GENERATION• Photovoltaic (PV)• Hydroelectric• Biomass• Other...
ENERGY PROJECT FUNDINGESPC: Energy Savings Performance ContractingAgreement between a Federal facility and an energy services company (ESCO). TheESCO designs a project to increase energy efficiency and/or implement renewableenergy at a facility. The ESCO then purchases and installs the necessary equipment. TheESCO is responsible for maintaining the equipment, as well as measuring the energyconsumption and savings. In exchange, the Federal agency pays the company a share ofthe savings resulting from the energy efficiency improvements/renewable energygeneration. To implement this type of financing, guaranteed savings is required, alongwith measurement and verification reporting requirements. At end of contract term theagency retains 100% of the future energy savings. ESPC projects require federalownership of the project.
ENERGY PROJECT FUNDINGUESC: Utility Energy Savings ContractingSimilar to ESPC agreements, but involve the utility serving the Federal facility instead ofa private energy services company. In a UESC, a utility company agrees to provideFederal agencies with services or products (or both) that are designed to make Federalfacilities more energy efficient or utilize more renewable energy. Federal agencies mayuse appropriated funds in addition to securing third party project financing through theutility when implementing UESCs. The utility is repaid over the contract term from thecost savings generated by the energy efficiency and/or renewable energy measures.During the contract period, the facility pays a lower utility bill, as well as a payment tothe utility for the UESC project. The total of these two payments should be less than orequal to an average amount of utility bills before the UESC.
ENERGY PROJECT FUNDINGECIP: Energy Conservation Investment ProgramSubset of the Defense Agencies Military Construction (MILCON) program specificallydesignated for projects that save energy or reduce DoD energy costs. It includesconstruction of new, high-efficiency energy systems, the improvement andmodernization of existing systems, and new renewable energy projects. ECIP wascreated in 1976 as an energy conservation funding mechanism. ECIP investment awardsare made based upon savings to investment ratio and simple payback criteria. ECIPfunding is limited, and is awarded on a competitive basis within the Army - only themost economically feasible projects are funded. Like UESC, it requires federalownership.
ENERGY PROJECT FUNDINGQUTM: Utilities ModernizationThe Utilities Modernization Program (UMP) focuses on those utility systems that areeither exempt from privatization or pending exemption from privatization.Modernization, as part of the Department of Defense Recapitalization program, isdefined as alteration of facilities to implement new or higher standards, toaccommodate new functions, to increase the efficiencies of components or the overallsystem and to replace building components that are at or beyond their service life.Modernization may be required due to a new mission or a change of capacityrequirements at a particular location. Modernization may be accomplished through:incremental upgrades or replacements of a facility over the facility service life; fullmodernization or refurbishment of a facility at the end of its service life; orreplacement of a facility at the end of its service life.
CONTRACT EXECUTION• US Army Corps of Engineers • Huntsville (HNC) • Savannah (SAS) • Wilmington (SAW)• Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) • Fort Bragg Mission Contracting Office (MCO)