Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
  • Save
Adopting and Implementing an Open Access Policy: The Library's Role
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Adopting and Implementing an Open Access Policy: The Library's Role


The faculty at Allegheny College are on the verge of adopting an open access policy. The library has been influential in its creation and will be integral in its implementation. The first part of …

The faculty at Allegheny College are on the verge of adopting an open access policy. The library has been influential in its creation and will be integral in its implementation. The first part of this presentation will introduce the College’s open access policy. It will discuss the faculty’s concerns and final decision making process. The library’s role in the formation of this policy will be analyzed. The second part of this presentation will focus on implementation, especially the library’s institutional repository (IR). Allegheny’s IR is a ‘dual-purpose system’. It includes content available to all users (e.g., digitized manuscripts) and content available only to Allegheny affiliated users (e.g., classified administrative documents). This approach has been beneficial, affirming the importance of IRs to the campus and scholarly communications. Such duality, however, may pose new obstacles for carrying out Allegheny’s open access policy. Additional implementation issues will be considered.Presenter: Brian Kern, Allegheny College

Published in Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Adopting and Implementing anOpen Access Policy: The Library’sRoleBrian KernHead of Technical ServicesPelletier
  • 2. Outline• Institutional profile• Adopting the policy• Implementing the policy• Conclusion: Lessons Learned
  • 4. About Allegheny College• Small residential liberal arts college located innorthwestern Pennsylvania– No graduate or online programs– ‘Traditional’ student population– Enrollment (2012-13) = 2140– Faculty (2012-13) = 200• Small number of grants
  • 5. About Pelletier Library• Staff: 16.5 (FTE)• Current # of journals: 12,143– 358 subscriptions (print and / or online)– 27 package deals– 97% of our journalscome from a package deal• 1/3 of entire budget spenton journals
  • 6. • Journal cancellations in 2004 and 2010– Over 2/3 of collection has been cut in last decade– Preference for publisher deals when they makeeconomic sense• Advocating for open access is a primary goalof the library.
  • 7. Open Source Software• DSpace: open source institutional repository– Hosted and supported by a third party vendor• Also using open source software for learningmanagement system (LMS), ERM, and serialsmanagement.
  • 9. Allegheny’s Open Access Policy• Officially adopted by the faculty on March14, 2013.• Developed by a faculty committee whosecharge includes sabbatical requests and localfunding for research projects.•
  • 10. Policy• Permission based policy– “Harvard-style policy”– Faculty gives College nonexclusive right to maketheir work available through Open Access– Early drafts of the policy were ‘encouragementpledges’• No specifics about implementation in thepolicy
  • 11. Waiver• Policy states it will be automatically granted• Waivers are necessary when– Embargo– Publisher prohibits participation– Author does not want to participate• No restrictions on where to publish• Encouraged to remove restrictive languagefrom contracts
  • 12. Closed Archive• Despite obtaining a waiver, the article still hasto be archived– “Closed” archive where only the author can accessthe article
  • 13. Scholarly articles• Only interested in peer-reviewed articles, notconference proceedings, etc.• There is no stipulation on what form thearticle is– Published article– Prior to peer-review (preprint)– After peer-review, but before publication(postprint)• Contracts with publisher dictates the form
  • 14. Exceptions• No obligation to self-archive articles writtenprior to the adoption of this policy• No need to renegotiate licenses prior to theadoption of this policy
  • 15. Funding• Library offers $3,000 funding for open accessfees• Provost matching $3,000 funding• Hope is to carry over unused funds to build upthe fund (maximum $12,000)
  • 16. Role of the Library• Indirect– Journal cancellations– Marketing through newsletters– Speaking at committee meetings• Direct– Implementing the policy
  • 18. Staff and setup• Setup– Website– DSpace (Institutional Repository)• Staffing– Library director: website and policy questions– Instructional technologist: website and copyrightissues– Head of Technical Services: DSpace– Student assistant
  • 19. Website• Policy• FAQ• Author addendums• Waivers• Funding requests• Terminology and related information
  • 20. DSpace• Faculty Scholarship collection–• Faculty will submit articles through DSpace– Basic citation information– Abstract– Embargo– Files• Submissions are reviewed/accepted andadditional metadata is added
  • 21. People and Places• Monthly e-mail newsletter / blog of studentand faculty publication, proceedings, andother scholarly achievements– Library uses this resource to identify and acquirefaculty publications such as books and articles– Most faculty are used to contributing to thissource–
  • 22. CHALLENGES: IR, OAI & GOOGLEImplementing an Open Access Policy:
  • 23. Building the Repository• Adding faculty articles that were already OAprior to enactment of the policy– Initial focus on published articles that are OA• Using Stephen X. Flynn’s code for seeking outOA articles• See his ACRL poster / blog entry at
  • 24. DSpace @ Allegheny• Implemented DSpace in 2009• Hybrid repository– ‘part open, part closed’ (Crawford, 17)– Senior Projects and College Committee minutesare limited to Allegheny users– Special Collections, Departmentalcollections, College Newspaper (The Campus), andOA articles are open to the world•
  • 25. Open Collections• The Documents of Ida M. Tarbell– Online collection started in 2009– Supported by NEH grant– 14,500 records and still growing– All metadata and image files available to the world
  • 26. Closed collections• Senior Projects– Started in 2009– Voluntary, unless department mandates– No metadata or projects are available to the world• Necessary for the project to get off the ground– Library acquires permission from students tomake projects available to Allegheny users and theworld
  • 27. “Hybrid access, not open access…”• Three ways DSpace exposes metadata1. Google crawlers2. Google Scholar Metadata MappingIndexing in Google
  • 28. ExampleGoogle Scholar• google.citation_title• google.citation_journal_title• google.citation_volume• google.citation_firstpageDSpace• dc.title• dc.relation.ispartof• dc.citation.volume• dc.citation.spage
  • 29. “Hybrid access, not open access…”• Three ways DSpace exposes metadata1. Google crawlers2. Google Scholar Metadata Mapping3. Open Archives Initiative (OAI)
  • 30. Metadata Exposure at Allegheny• Allegheny has implemented– Google crawlers– Google Scholar Metadata Mapping• Allegheny cannot implement OAI– Closed collections• This is not an issue for us, but…
  • 31. • Most discovery platforms rely on OAI– Allegheny does not have a discovery platform• Limiting our ability to make OA articlesavailable to the world• Fortunately, users can access our OAcollections through Google
  • 32. Opportunities• A new version of DSpace will– fix the OAI issue– introduce new embargo capabilities• ‘Restricted’ metadata will likely go away• OA has forced Allegheny and DSpace toimprove their systems.
  • 33. LESSONS LEARNED (IN 86 DAYS)Conclusion
  • 34. Adopting an OA Policy• Allegheny’s open access policy is dependenton:– Faculty with a passion to see open access a reality– Library keeping faculty informed of the issues• Funding plan was our most urgent need• “It’s not about us…”– It’s about author rights!
  • 35. Implementing a policy• Make sure plans for submitting articles are inplace• Help faculty comply with the policy– Don’t expect faculty to be copyright lawyers– Use existing resources• People and Places• SHERPA / RoMEO
  • 36. • Keep the submission process simple– IR– E-mail– Whatever is convenient for them• Expose your collection!
  • 37. Acknowledgements• Linda Bills, Director of the Library, AlleghenyCollege• Academic Support Committee at AlleghenyCollege– Dr. Bradley Hersh, chair• Ellen Finnie Duranceau, Program Manager forScholarly Publishing & Licensing, MIT Libraries• Stephen X. Flynn, Emerging TechnologiesLibrarian, College of Wooster
  • 38. ReferencesAllegheny College DSpace Repository.[accessed May 11, 2013].Allegheny College Open Access Policy. [accessed May 11, 2013].Bills, Linda. Open Access Journals: Reclaiming Scholarship. @theLibrary2.0 1, no.1 (Fall 2011): n.p.Crawford, Walt. Open Access: What You Need to Know Now. ALA EditionsSpecial Reports. Chicago: American Library Association, 2011.Duranceau, Ellen Finnie and Sue Kriegsman. Implementing Open AccessPolicies Using Institutional Repositories. In The InstitutionalRepository: Benefits and Challenges, ed. Pamela Bluh and CindyHepfer, 75-97. Association for Library Collections & TechnicalServices, 2013. [accessed May 11, 2013].
  • 39. References (cont).EBSCO. Serials Price Projections for 2013.Flynn, Stephen X. “Kickstart your Institutional Repositorywith Content from Publishers.” Poster presented atAssociation for College and Research Libraries (ACRL)2013 Conference, Indianapolis, IN, April 11, 2013. [accessed May 11, 2013].Google. Google Scholar: Inclusion Guidelines forWebmasters. [accessed May 11, 2013].Suber, Peter. Open Access. MIT Press Essential KnowledgeSeries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.