Phillip.hall
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Phillip.hall

on

  • 12,899 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
12,899
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
12,899
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Phillip.hall Phillip.hall Presentation Transcript

    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Collaborative Multi-Center Implementation of NPR 7123.1A Phillip Hall NASA MSFC Nancy McNelis NASA GRCUsed with Permission www.nasa.gov 1
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Can Centers Develop “Common” Processes? • Common Goal is Compliance with NPRs – NASA Procedural Requirements Establish “What” NASA HQ Expects of the Centers – Center Level Procedural Requirements Establish “How” it is Done at that Given Center • Centers Do Not Have Common Organizational Structure • NPR 7120 Series is Project Focused, Not Organizational Focused The Question Then Becomes … • Is the Project Structure from Center to Center Similar Enough to Allow “Common” Processes? www.nasa.gov 2
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Can Centers Develop “Common” Processes? Matrix from Space Flight Directorate Matrix from Engineering Directorate Matrix from S&MA WBS01GRC Typical Project Structure Project Manager Matrix from Other Directorates Deputy PM Project Chief Engineer WBS03 WBS01 Safety & Mission Assurance Business Support Office Chief Safety Officer Project Support Staff WBS02 WBS04 WBS05 WBS (n) WBS (n) Systems Engineering Element 4 Element 5 Element (n) Element (n) Lead Systems Eng Element Lead Element Lead Element Lead Element Lead www.nasa.gov 3
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Can Centers Develop “Common” Processes? NASA Administrator Deputy Administrator NASA Chief Engineer Associate AdministratorMSFC Typical Project Structure Mission Directorate AA MSFC Center Director Program Manager MSFC Eng Director MSFC Eng Deputy MSFC Chief Eng MSFC Eng Center Discipline Leads Directors - Senior Eng Manager Dept/Lab Managers Independent Reviews Program assigned Management Presence MSFC Deputy Program Manager MSFC Program Chief Eng* MSFC Eng Division Chiefs Project Manager MSFC Project Chief Eng MSFC Eng Branch Chiefs Program Authority MSFC Chief Eng Technical Authority Manager’s Staff Direct Report MSFC Senior Eng Presence Institutional Eng Independent Reviews www.nasa.gov 4
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Common Goals • Comply with NASA Procedural Requirements (“What”) – Requirements traceability from NPRs to Center Level Procedures • Provide Sufficient Detail (“How”) – Outline a Step by Step Process of “How” for Project Execution – Define Roles and Responsibilities of the Project Teams – Incorporate Best Practices – Provide Commonality on How Projects Conduct Business within the Organization • Prevent Shelf-ware Mentality – Provide Forms/Templates for Project Use • Templates which are Annotated Outlines of Project Documentation • Forms which are Available Electronically Develop “Common” Processes for the Organizations Rather Than on a Program/Project Basis www.nasa.gov 5
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Achieving Common Goals Where We’ve Been? • Minimal Confidence in Project Planning and Estimates because assumes LOE-based rather than Task-based • Lack of “Standard Toolbox” – Inconsistencies in Deliverables and Products – Results in a lot of re-work • Project-by-Project Approach Rather than Institutionalized • Unclear Use of Best Practices and Lessons Learned www.nasa.gov 6
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Achieving Common Goals Where Are We? • GRC – Organized Management Steering Group in 2007 – Defined and Documented Development Approach – Obtained Executive Sponsorship and Organizational Buy-in – Began Collaborative Development with MSFC – Launched the Space Mission Excellence Program for Systems Engineering in 2006 • MSFC – Organized Engineering Directorate Management Steering Group in 2008 – Leveraging Work Defined at GRC – Gaining Executive Sponsorship and Organizational Buy-in – Working with Office of Strategic Analysis and Communications (OSAC) to tie into Project Management – Introduction to the MSFC Systems Engineering Leadership Development program www.nasa.gov 7
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration GRC Procedural Requirement Documents GLPR7120.5.10 GRC Space Flight Projects Center Mgmt (NPR 1400.1)GRC Development & Implementation Formulation & Implementation Requirements SM&A (NPD 8700.1) GLPD 1410.2 GLPR 1410.1 GLPR 8730.5 GRC Doc GRC Directives Quality System GLPR 8700.4 Safety - Text in Doc - Management Management Manual Safety & Mission Operations & Assessment Sustainment GLPR7120.5.20 GLPR 1410.3 -Text in Doc- GLPR 7120.5.30 Deviations & Waiver Lower Level Center Doc Training Safety & Assurance Requirements (SAR) Document Mgmt Quality Assurance Reliability & GLPR 1270.1 Maintainability Corrective & Preventative Action Program/Project Management (NPR 7120.5) GLPD7120.1 GLHB-B-7120.1 GLPR7120.5.41 GLPR7120.5.43 Text in Doc EVM EVM System Project Review Acquisition 10 Sections in Handbook Board GLPR7120.5.10 GLPR7120.5.42 GLPR 7120.0.6 GLPR7120.5.40 GLPR 7123.34 Management Lessons Learned GRC Project and Project Config Item Reporting Technical Planning & Data Management Engineering Management (NPR 7123.1) GLPR 7123.11 GLPR 7123.12 GLPR 7123.32 GLPR 7120.5.40 GLPR 7123.34 GLPR 7123.34 -Text in Doc- GLPR 7150.1 Requirements Def Design Interface GRC Project and Project Config Item Project Config Item 6 Sections in Software & Mgmt Solutions Mgmt Technical Planning & Data Management & Data GLPR7120.5.10 Engineering Management Requirements GLPR 7123.21 GLPR 7123.22 GLPR 7123.23 GLPR7120.0.4 GLPR 7123.35 GLPR 7123.36 GLPR 7123.37 Product Transition Verification & Implementation & Risk Management Project Technical Engineering Decision Analysis Validation Integration Reviews Review Board https://knowledgeshare-in.grc.nasa.gov/eRoom/NASAc1f1/GRCProjectandSERequirementsWebContent www.nasa.gov 8
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Standard GLPR ArchitectureGRC Development & Implementation Project Objective Project Project Project Requirement Deliverables Results N PR’s Define “What” Process Processes Deliverables Techniques Templates Work Products Activities GL PR’s Forms Define “How” Concepts at GRC Tasks Lessons Components Learned Best Practices www.nasa.gov 9
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Standard GLPR FormattingGRC Development & Implementation Activity (Sub-chapter level designee) Grouping of tasks that create a logical deliverable (or group of deliverables) Flow chart WITH SWIMLANES Graphical illustration relationships of the tasks within an activity Task (Sub-Sub-chapter level designee) Title of specific work to be performed necessary to build the deliverable. Should follow the Verb-Noun format Task Descriptor (Letter designee) Specific description of work performed necessary to build the deliverable. • Should begin with the responsible role Will contain Shall statements if applicable. Additional Guidance (Not shown) Addition information provided to help the responsible person perform this task www.nasa.gov 10
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration GLPR Development ProcedureGRC Development & Implementation 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Identify and Owner Review MSG Executive BMS Document Peer Review (CEO, M, Q, etc.) Inspection Presentation Submittal Procedure • Identify New • Owner • Peer Review • Formal • Present • Completed Processes or Reviews is Initiated Inspection Completed GLPR Revision High Level Process document to submitted to Process Executives BMS • Assign • Feedback Resources • GLPR Provided to • Pilot Finalized Inspectors Approved • Use Std Processes Templates Success Criteria • Leverage SMEs • Owner • MSG Leads • MSG Will • Executive • Formally Review and Will Determine Awareness Manage • Draft Process Concur Determine Executive Document Flow MSG Review • Pre-MSG Inspection Readiness • Draft GLPR Inspection Readiness Document Readiness www.nasa.gov 11
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration GLPR Development Status Review Gates Owner MSG Executive BMSGRC Development & Implementation GLPR # Document Name Peer Review Review Inspection Review Status Wave One 7123.36 Engineering Review Board (ERB) Complete Complete Complete Complete GLPR 7123.35 GRC Project Technical Reviews Complete Complete Complete Complete GLPR GRC Requirement Development and 7123.11 Complete Complete Complete Complete GLID Management Process 7120.14 Waivers/Deviations Process Complete Complete Complete Complete Not Submitted 7120.5.40 Project and Technical Planning Complete Complete Complete Complete GLPR 7123.22 Product Verification and/or Validation Complete Complete Complete Complete GLID 7123.34 Data and Configuration Management Complete Pending TBD 1/19/10 Not Submitted 7120.5.10 Space Flight Project Requirements Complete Complete Complete Complete GLID 7123.37 Decision Analysis Complete Complete 10/20/09 11/20/09 Not Submitted 7120.5.41 Project Review Board (PRB) Complete Complete Not Applicable Complete GLPR 7120.5.42 Management Reporting Complete 10/30/09 11/16/09 1/14/10 Not Submitted 7123.33 Risk Management Complete Complete KO 12/7 TBD Not Submitted 7120.5.30 Space Assurance Requirements (SAR) Complete Complete Complete Complete GLPR 8700.5 Problem Reporting and Resolution Complete NA NA NA Not Submitted 7123.32 Interface Management TBD TBD TBD TBD Not Submitted 7123.21 Product Transition Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted 7123.23 Product Imp and Integration Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted 7120.xx EVM Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted 7120.5.43 Project Acquisition Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted 7123.12 Design Solutions Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted 7123.41 Design and As-Built Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Wave 3 Not Submitted www.nasa.gov 12
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration MSFC Doc Tree – Before NPR 7123.1 NASA Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements (Requirements [68] / Processes [17] / Best Practices [105] / Reviews [16])MSFC Development & Implementation MPR 7123.1 MPR 7123.2 MSFC Systems Engineering Technical Reviews and Review Item Discrepancy (RID) Processes and Requirements Processing, MSFC Programs and Projects Requirements [68] / Processes [17] / Best Practices [105] (Reviews [16]) + MSFC RID Process AS42/Jeff Moore ED10/Phillip Hall PS01/Felecia Wilson ED10/Phillip Hall QD40/William Powell ED11/Amy Hemken ED11/Amy Hemken MWI 6410.1 MWI 8050.1 MPR 5000.1 MWI 7123.1 MWI 7120.6 MPR 8040.1 MWI 7120.2 Handling, Storage, Verification and Purchasing Reqts Development Prog/Proj Risk Configuration Data Reqt Packaging, Preserv., Validation of EM03/Patricia Johnson and Management Mangement Management Ident. / Def and Delivery (HSPPD) Hardware, Software, MPR 1280.2 (5 of 17 Processes) DA01/Mary Demurray ED11/Eugena Goggans and Ground Support Process Control MPR 1280.1 MWI 7120.4 Equipment for MSFC PS01/Felecia Wilson Management Doc. Prep. MWI 5100.1 Review Prog/Proj Initiating Proc. Req. EI41/Ronie Akins MWI 1280.1 Mechanical Fab. Request Instructions System Design Processes 1 - Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process 2 - Technical Requirements Definition Process 3 - Logical Decomposition Process *4 - Design Solution Definition Process We developed 3 MSFC Product Realization Processes 5 - Product Integration Process documents to fill in the gaps *6 - Product Implementation Process shown by the initial 7 - Product Verification Process 8 - Product Validation Process 9 - Product Transition Process compliance analysis Technical Management Processes *10 - Technical Planning Process 11 - Technical Requirements Management Process * = 4 additional MWIs needed [4, 6, 10 & 17] 12 - Interface Management Process 13 - Technical Risk Management Process 14 - Configuration Management Process Existing MWIs replacement [in future] 15 - Technical Data Management Process 16 - Technical Assessment Process *17 - Decision Analysis Process www.nasa.gov 13
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration MSFC Doc Tree - Proposed NPR 7123.1 NASA Systems Engineering Processes and RequirementsMSFC Development & Implementation ( Requirements [68] / Processes [17] / Best Practices [105] / Reviews [16] ) MPR 7123.2 MPR 7123.1 Technical Reviews and Review Item Discrepancy (RID) MSFC Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements Processing, MSFC Programs and Projects ( Requirements [68] / Processes [17] / Best Practices [105] ) ( Reviews [16] ) + MSFC RID Process MWI 7123.1 MSFC Systems Engineering Processes MSE 7123.1 MSE 7123.2 MSE 7123.3 MSE 7123.4 MSE 7123.5 MSE 7123.6 MSE 7123.7 MSE 7123.8 MSE 7123.9 Stakeholder Technical Logical Design Product Product Product Product Product Expectation Requirement Decomposit’n Solution Implementat’n Integration Verification Validation Transition Definition s Definition Definitions System Design Processes Product Realization Processes MSE 7123.10 MSE 7123.11 MSE 7123.12 MSE 7123.13 MSE 7123.14 MSE 7123.15 MSE 7123.16 MSE 7123.17 Technical Requirement Interface Technical Technical Technical Technical Decision Planning Management Management Risk Config Data Assessment Analysis Management Management Managemen t Technical Management Processes Checklists Specific Practice Templates Forms Roles & Responsibilities Process Metrics www.nasa.gov 14
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Content Structure MWI 7123.1 MSE 7123.1 • MWI 7123.1 will contain informationMSFC Development & Implementation MWI Groups the 17 NASA SE Engine SE Processes common to all MSEs MSE Process • MSEs set the standards for complying 1 MSE for each of the 17 SE Processes with NPR 7123.1 requirements • Process metrics to allow for continuous MSE 7123.2 improvement MSE Primary Content Points to Toolboxes MSE Process Process Overview Specific Practice (steps) (including R&R) Process Objectives • Specific Practices will contain Templates recommended implementation Process Metrics guidance • Augmented by toolbox Checklists containing templates & checklists • Format allows for seamless import into SEG www.nasa.gov 15
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration MSFC ProcedureMSFC Development & Implementation (1) Perform (2) Develop (3) Review (4) Review with (5) Develop Literature Search Process Flow Process Flow Stakeholders Document Collect and outline Develop top-level Internal review of Coordinated effort to Develop detailed industry and SE data flow for the proposed process obtain stakeholder content for the MSE discipline best MSE and IDEF0 for flow. buy-in on how and Specific practices. the Specific MSFC is going to Practices. Practices. proceed in doing business (6) Develop (7) Conduct Mgmt (8) Finalize (9) Implement into (10) Submit Doc for Toolbox Inspection of Doc Document SEG Formal Release Develop the Conduct internal Incorporate Review Post and make Update SEG, as associated review within ED10 Team comments content available to required Templates and and applicable MSFC programs & Checklists (artifacts) stakeholders (e.g., a projects pre-established review team of SMEs to review and provide comments on each MSE before finalizing www.nasa.gov 16
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration MSFC Systems Engineering FrameworkMSFC Development & Implementation Process Tools Training People Time National Vision Human Capital NPR’s NEN APPEL Mission Needs Agency NID’s, etc. MBSE NPR Training Strategy & Agency Goals Investments MSFC DCB, DGA APPEL CMS Center Goals & RID, ICE Enterprise Processes UAH, etc. Center Staff Missions Objectives Safety/Reliability St ARM/IRMA (Risk) Integrated Staff SMA Specialty SMA andards Reliability & Other Courses w/in Product Life-Cycle Quality Standards Analytical Tools Programs/Projects Marshall Inc ARM/IRMA (Risk) Programs/ 7120 Processes Schedule APPEL Project Offices Product Lifecycle Projects EVM SE Leader 7123 SEG, Cradle, Development Engineering Engineering 17 Processes DOORS Program Directorate System Lifecycle APPEL Domain Processes CAD/Pro-E, EMC, Line Engineers Design (Bluebook) MAT Lab APPEL Lab Personnel Major Milestones CDMS, Thermal Across Centers www.nasa.gov 17
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Achieving Common Goals Where Are We? (Continued) • Establish MOU Between GRC and MSFC Focused at Developing “Common” Center Level Procedures • Benefits of the Collaborative Effort Between GRC and MSFC – Establishing common terminology and definitions – Consistency in process steps leading to product and design solutions with tighter integration – Consistency in templates and checklists leading to less time to translate between common products – Better understanding of process interrelationships, leading to more efficient analysis of inputs and outputs that support other teams – Consistency in the quality of work products or artifacts – Better understanding of each centers’ governance processes and associated roles & responsibilities www.nasa.gov 18
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Achieving Common Goals Where Are We? (Continued) • Specific Goals and Objectives of the Collaboration: – Review of current development processes – Share development processes and tools – Provide access to or make center procedural requirement documents available – Create a common Project Asset Repository – Participate in each other’s peer reviews – Participate in each other’s procedural formal inspections – Co-develop (and delivery) training, communication, continuous improvement and plans www.nasa.gov 19
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Achieving Common Goals Where Do We Want To Be? • Institute a Holistic, Systems Approach to Develop Procedures and Processes within NASA – Gain Consensus Between Multiple Centers to Accomplish Common Goals – Build Sponsorship from the Respective Engineering Directorates – Leverage the Collective Intellect Across NASA – Common workforce development strategies for Systems Engineering • Define, Develop and Maintain Consistent Capabilities and Competencies Across NASA • Provide Process to NASA Enterprise Architecture Key to Fostering Future Collaborative Programs/Projects between NASA Centers www.nasa.gov 20
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Questions www.nasa.gov 21
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Back Up www.nasa.gov 22
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov 23
    • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Iterative Nature of MSFC System Design Process (1.3) Identify Later MSE 7123.4 Process Artifact (Output) (1.2) Identify Later MSE 7123.3 Process Artifact (Output) (1.1) Identify Later MSE 7123.2 Process Artifact (Output) (3.1) Updated (3.2a) Updated (3.2b) Updated Earlier Artifacts Earlier Artifacts Earlier Artifacts Drives Updates Drives Updates Drives Updates to Later Artifacts to Later Artifacts to Later Artifacts MSE 7123.2 Iterate Iterate Iterate MSE 7123.1 Allocated Reqs MSE 7123.3 MSE 7123.4 Stakeholder Technical Design Logical Expectations Requirements Solutions Decomposition Definition Definition Definition Derived Reqs (2.1) Use insight from Later MSE 7123.2 Artifact (as Input) to Update Earlier Artifacts (2.2) Use insight from Later MSE 7123.3 Artifact (as Input) to Update Earlier Artifacts (2.3) Use insight from Later MSE 7123.4 Artifact (as Input) to Update Earlier Artifacts Typical Artifacts Typical Artifacts Typical Artifacts Typical Artifacts • Stakeholder • Physical Architecture • Physical Architecture • System-Specified Expectations (top level showing (decomposed-complete) Requirements • MOEs Context Diagram) • Functional Architecture • End-Product-Specified • ConOps • Functional Architecture (decomposed-complete) Requirements • Context Diagram (top level) • Derived Technical • Initial Subsystem • Design Reference • Operational Architecture Requirements Specification Mission (complete) (decomposed - lower • Enabling Product • Mission Phase / Sub- • MOPs levels) Requirements Phases • TPMs • Product Verification Plan • Operational Scenarios • Technical Requirements • Product Validation Plan • States & Modes (top level) • Logistics and Operate • Enabling Product To Procedures Support Strategies www.nasa.gov 24