Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Review of Adolphe Appia
Review of Adolphe Appia
Review of Adolphe Appia
Review of Adolphe Appia
Review of Adolphe Appia
Review of Adolphe Appia
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Review of Adolphe Appia

539

Published on

Published in: Technology, Sports
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
539
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Adolphe Appia Critical Review ( Charlie Hall, Lucy Hammond, Gemma Greaves, Laura Guthrie)
  • 2. Is the Pack Accurate.
    • Does it fairly summarise and represent the mainstream view on this practitioner?
    • The pack summarised all of the main aspects of the work and life of Adolphe Appia.
    • The pack could have however included a more diverse range of viewpoints on the practitioner.
    • The presentation of the pack as a whole was aesthetically pleasing.
  • 3. Are Sources Cited Properly?
    • Links provided in alphabetical order.
    • No references for quotations, or Harvard referencing.
    • If a student wished to find the sources of their quotations they would find it very difficult to do so.
  • 4. Personal and Divergent Viewpoints.
    • There is not a wide range of opinions in the pack.
    • There are no personal viewpoints from the authors of the impact on them.
    • There isn’t any discussion on the problems raised by the practitioner’s work.
  • 5. Is the Application of Ideas Appropriate?
    • The section on symbolism was very informative.
    • The information on his techniques and innovative practices was of a high quality.
  • 6. Overall…
    • The pack is very well presented.
    • There are informative, relevant images.
    • Points explained well.
    • Could be more references.

×