Adolphe Appia Critical Review ( Charlie Hall, Lucy Hammond, Gemma Greaves, Laura Guthrie)
Is the Pack Accurate. <ul><li>Does it fairly summarise and represent the mainstream  view on this practitioner? </li></ul>...
Are Sources Cited Properly? <ul><li>Links provided in alphabetical order. </li></ul><ul><li>No references for quotations, ...
Personal and Divergent Viewpoints. <ul><li>There is not a wide range of opinions in the pack. </li></ul><ul><li>There are ...
Is the Application of Ideas Appropriate? <ul><li>The section on symbolism was very informative. </li></ul><ul><li>The info...
Overall… <ul><li>The pack is very well presented. </li></ul><ul><li>There are informative, relevant images.  </li></ul><ul...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Review of Adolphe Appia

632 views
588 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Sports
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
632
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Review of Adolphe Appia

  1. 1. Adolphe Appia Critical Review ( Charlie Hall, Lucy Hammond, Gemma Greaves, Laura Guthrie)
  2. 2. Is the Pack Accurate. <ul><li>Does it fairly summarise and represent the mainstream view on this practitioner? </li></ul><ul><li>The pack summarised all of the main aspects of the work and life of Adolphe Appia. </li></ul><ul><li>The pack could have however included a more diverse range of viewpoints on the practitioner. </li></ul><ul><li>The presentation of the pack as a whole was aesthetically pleasing. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Are Sources Cited Properly? <ul><li>Links provided in alphabetical order. </li></ul><ul><li>No references for quotations, or Harvard referencing. </li></ul><ul><li>If a student wished to find the sources of their quotations they would find it very difficult to do so. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Personal and Divergent Viewpoints. <ul><li>There is not a wide range of opinions in the pack. </li></ul><ul><li>There are no personal viewpoints from the authors of the impact on them. </li></ul><ul><li>There isn’t any discussion on the problems raised by the practitioner’s work. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Is the Application of Ideas Appropriate? <ul><li>The section on symbolism was very informative. </li></ul><ul><li>The information on his techniques and innovative practices was of a high quality. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Overall… <ul><li>The pack is very well presented. </li></ul><ul><li>There are informative, relevant images. </li></ul><ul><li>Points explained well. </li></ul><ul><li>Could be more references. </li></ul>

×