We view the world through field dependence or independence (Witkin 1954, 1973, 1977)
Left Hand SideSequential processing, A to b to C Right Hand SideLooks at facts and detailed informationSplits the world into concrete and Holistic processing, big pictureidentifiable categories orientatedLogical cause and effect reasoning Visual and spatialLinear thinking from task to task Looks at the whole rather than piecesFollows on pre-existing fixed rules Analogic: sees similarities andMaths and science resemblancesStatistically inclined Feelings and emotional thoughtSystematic appraisal Philosophy and religionThinks in words and language Thinks in imagesUtilizes the concept of time, past and Transformativepresent IntuitiveObjective reality based Looks for relationships, patterns, makesLogically strategizes associationsSplits things apart Looks for unbounded connectionsKnows Lumps things together: connectorAcknowledges ImaginationReality based Present and future orientatedRealistic Looks at possibilitiesSafety, risk adverse Uses symbols and images Believes Appreciates Fantasy based Impetuous Adventurous, risk taker
Please say the colours Yellow Blue Orange Black Red Green Purple Yellow Red Orange Green Black Blue Red Purple Green Blue Orange An example of hemisphere conflict
The Prefrontal Cortex The ability to manipulate The ability to imagine
The Fourth Factor Emotions influence our decisions beforereasoning, a leftover from our primal existence.
Is it rationality or emotion you that makes you decide to buy a car like this?
Consciousness is partly a social phenomena Narrative is the heart of consciousness
Narrative expresses …………….. Hopes Feelings Ethical & spiritual codes Social hierarchies Empathy Imagination Self identity Fears Our introspections Sharing values Sharing beliefs Means of transferring ideas Problem solving Our projections Our relational position to society Meaning
The Four Part Brain 3. Empathic/Imaginative 2. Holistic 1. Rational 4. Emotional
Causation, correlation or even reverse causation?White, Roderick E. , Thornhill, Stewart andHampson, Elizabeth, Entrepreneurs andEvolutionary Biology: The Relationship High-testosteronebetween Testosterone and New Venture entrepreneurs leadCreation (2003). Babson College, BabsonKauffman Entrepreneurship Research bigger--but lessConference (BKERC), 2002-2006 profitable--firmsENTREPRENEURS ANDEVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY:THE RELATIONSHIPBETWEEN TESTOSTERONEAND NEW VENTURE What drives women out of entrepreneurship? The joint role of testosterone and culture
The fallacy of factors leading to successFactors contributing to the growth of small manufacturing firms: data from Australia The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in
New Economic PollutionParadigms Growth Fossil Fuels Export/Import Transport Farm Raw materials Transport Government Power Production Transport Diversity generation Warehouse Management Supermarket Conflict Research & Community Development Consumption Education Regulation Competition & Tension Air Transport Poverty & Unhappiness Development Waste Health Uncertainty A simplified environment
Losing sight of variables Location Climate Genetic Material Humidity Collection Temperature Purchase Sunshine hoursTopography UV radiation Plant physiology Seasons Slope & drainage Propagation Yield and Rainfall characteristics Chemical Constituents of the Humus Nutrients Method of extraction Essential Oil Extraction time Compactness Drainage & water holding qualities Pest & weed pH control Pre-harvest handlingMineral residuals Irrigation & preparation Plant densities Soil type Time & method of harvest Agronomic Harvest & Soil Practices Extraction Practices
Even simple environments are complex and have multiple perspectives
Attempt to Deny an unhappy impress listener Keeping Face family life Keeping up with theNarrative device of “Jones” optimism “We would be very happy if our children undertook higher education” Cultural Could be the truth expectations Showing off Peoples statements can have multiple meanings
Narrative as Truth Narrative as hope Narrative as we want others to see us Narrative as we see our self Narrative as we want to suppress Reality
All such notions as causation, succession and primary agent relationships are all figments of theimagination which can have multiple explanations. Narrative lets us see the explanation from the actor’s point of view.
Narrative is empirical research just as quantitative research is
Ricoeur argues that there is an integral connection between narrative and action.Narratives lead individuals to intervene in the course of things. The action derives from intention or motivation, based on the particular narratives of anindividual, irrespective of whether these are self generated, after appropriation from a culture.
Drummond argues ‘that narrative is thefundamental scheme for linking individualhuman action and events into interrelatedaspects of an understandable composite’.
Drummond argues organisation culture, leadership, conflictand change are narratives. One way of framing this is thatorganisation culture is composed of many narratives withenough coherence between them to give a sense of thewhole’.36 Change occurs when new narratives replace oldnarratives. If the change is superficial, then the narrativescould be described as morphostatic; (changing the chairs onthe Titanic would not stop the ship sinking); or morphogenic;where things will never be the same again’.37 Hence, it can beargued that the linking of strategy and complexity throughnarrative theory collectively extends each theory and providesa theoretical underpinning to understand better theseconcepts and the linkages between them.
A theoretical link must now be made betweennarrative and strategy and again the work ofRicoeur is instructive, beginning with narrativeand the individual. This will lead us to make theconnection between narrative and organisationalstrategy which in turn leads to the concept ofidentification since an organisation’s strategyrequires individuals (members of theorganisation) it identify with it, or support it, atleast in some minimal ways.
Narrative as a story• The way that stories are told, how meaning is constructed to achieve the understanding of the audience.• Groups events into cause and effect – action and inaction.• Organises time and space in very compressed form.• The voice of the narrative can vary; whose story is being told and from whose perspective?• Narrative plot refers to everything audibly or visibly present, i.e. selective.• Narrative story refers to all the events, explicitly presented or referred.
We use narratives or stories to make sense of our lives and the world around us. There different ways in which we use the narrative form:• As children we listen to fairytales and myths/legends. As we grow older, we read short stories, novels, history and biographies.• Religion is often presented through a collection of “stories/moral tales” e.g. the Bible, the Ramayana, etc.• Scientific breakthrough is often presented as stories of an experimenter/scientist’s trials.• Cultural phenomena such as plays, films, dance and paintings tell stories.• News events are told as stories.• Dreams are retold as stories.
The world is seen from our own perspective – our narrative
Experience introduces feeling & emotion to learning
Meaning• Dear Honorable Dato/Prof./Assoc.Prof./Dr./Mr/Mrs/Miss, Kindly be informed that there will be a talk on "Science of Knowledge", scheduled as follows : Date : 9th September 2011 (Friday) Time : 3.00 pm ~ 4.30 pm Venue : PPIPT Meeting Room, Block A Attendance : Compulsory to all academic staffs Speaker : Honorable Prof. Dato Wira Dr. Mohd Salleh Bin Hj Din Your commitment and attendance is deeply appreciated. Thanking in advance. Confidence?
The Things we think The things we do The intentions we have The things we buyAre all governed by our own stories
MeaningWe give symbols common meaning to form society’s narrative
Heaven Strategy (Dan Hill 2010) High More More negative/high positive/highe response r responseResponse Rate More More negative/lower positive/lower response Low response Negative Positive Emotional Response
Archetypes Our different selves can be considered archetypes • The hero (seeking something) • The Villain (opposing the hero) • The donor/benefactor/provider (a helper) •The dispatcher (sends the hero on his/her way)•The false hero (falsely assuming the role of the hero) •The helper (assisting the hero) •The princess (seeking protection of the hero)
Narrative is a form of ‘meaning making’. It is a complex formwhich expresses itself by drawing together descriptions of statesof affairs contained in individual sentences into particular types ofdiscourse. This drawing together creates a higher order ofmeaning that discloses relationships among states of affairs.Narrative recognizes the meaningfulness of individual experiencesby noting how they function as parts of a whole. Its particularsubject matter is human actions and events that affect humanbeings, which it configures into wholes according to the rolesthese actions and events play in bringing about a conclusion.Because narrative is particularly sensitive to the temporaldimension of human existence, it pays special attention to thesequence of actions and events occur.Poklinghorne, D. E. (1988) Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, Albany, NY State University of New York Press.
Narratives come into existence……Events happen and weobserve and participate in them and we make conscious (and unconscious) note of what is happening. Narrativeputs these events into our own context of understanding and feeling. Narrative is about how we make sense of the world Narrative is unique to a situation, bit similarsituations may have similar narratives by different people.
A Meta-Theory Trap & Filter Emotions Transactional Analysis and/or Field Theory Culture (Values, Beliefs & Assumptions) Narrative
Emplotment is integral to narrative. Narrative should consider a plot, with goals, causes, and chance being brought together within thetemporal unity of a whole and complete action. However the plot may avoid a chronological listing of events and transforms isolated vents into a schematic whole by highlighting and recognizing the contribution that each eventmakes to the development and outcome of the story.
Human experiences are held in the mind aspre-concepts (narratives in the making whichRicoeur calls mimesis 1, or pre-configuration. The articulation of an experience or the narration of an experience (its emplotment) is called mimesis 2, or configuration. Sometimes experiences are re-authored to make sense of the situation, which Ricoeur calls mimesis 3.
Images and Connections Vision Platform - PerceptionMimesis 1 Time & Space Potential Concept Generator – Making Connections Concepts Learning: Conceptual World Real World Sources of Opportunity Identifying Experimentation concepts & Testing Evaluation after experience “A Narrative” Ideas Complete re- evaluation (seek Mimesis 2 further information) Structure common to all Evaluated and opportunities Elaborated Upon Vision – Outcomes Time & Space Opportunity Resources Networks Mimesis 3 Skills, Competencies & Capabilities Competitive Environment Strategy – scope & depth
Articulated Narratives: Those that we are part, work, school, club, religion, nation, etc.Embedded Narratives: Specific narratives within a person’s consciousness from preconfigured experiences, etc.
Dominant Logic (Prahalad)The way people deal with events and situations in life. Dominant logic consists of a mental map which orientates a person. It can either inhibit or enhance learning, growth and fulfillment. I would like to reframe this as the dominant narrative
Dominant Logic• Our behaviour, focus and the way people act• A set of ideas about ourselves and the world• Personal rules and experiences• A reflection of our success, failure, and indifference• Something that is invisible, internal• An organisations genetic code• An organisations operating system
Paradoxes Innovate Avoid mistakes Live for today Think long term Save money Spend for the future Work by oneself Work as a group Collaborate Compete Conflict Harmony Be flexible Follow rules and normsMake your own decisions Make joint decisions
Listening Exercise• The simple act of listening shows how we sometimes wander through life with a low level of awareness. How many times when someone is speaking to you, are you preoccupied with other things? How often do we daydream when others are speaking? How often do you believe that what you think is right and what the other has to say is not worth listening to? How often are you just waiting for an opportunity to espouse what you think? How often are you just thinking of rebuttals, arguments against what a person is saying rather than actually listening to the content of what they are actually saying? How often are you making judgments about the person speaking or what they are saying? How often are you looking for an opportunity to disagree, agree, or run away? How often are you evaluating and comparing what a person is saying against what you believe? How often do you fail to seek clarification about something you don’t understand? Do you try and control the interaction by trying to dominate the conversation? Our listening habits usually show that our level of personal awareness is low and we are influenced by so much of our own emotion just in the act of listening to someone. This is at the cost of seeing new perspectives and exercising our ability to empathize with others. One member of the group should tell the rest of the group about what they did over the weekend un-interrupted. The rest of the group should take notes about what they were thinking about while they were listening to the story.
• The ability to listen effectively is a powerful tool in developing awareness, empathy, humility, and consequently understand new perspectives. Listening is much more than hearing, it involves being attentive to what others say, observing emotion, behaviour and body language, facial expressions, and fighting off our own internal distractions that lessen of ability to listen. Listening requires much more discipline, attention, and concentration than we expect. Think about it, how much self discipline do we need to really effectively listen to someone? Once we have achieved the discipline, attention, and concentration really needed to listen, we realize how powerful a tool listening is in understanding what a person has to say, and from where emotionally a person is saying it. Listening skills can be developed and refined through active and reflective listening techniques, where the listener repeats, paraphrases and reflects upon what the speaker is saying as a means of clarifying the message that the speaker is intending to convey to us .
We have multiple narratives in Physical Sensations ourselves Physical Awareness Material Awareness Social Awareness Ego Awareness Spiritual Awareness True Self (Universal awareness) Spiritual Self Ego Self Social Self Material Self Primal Self Perception Society
Imagination HeuristicsAction adverse Reckless overconfidence Negative emotions Future Orientation Positive emotions Optimal drive Value sets Optimal learning Sense of Present Sense of low self high self efficacy Orientation efficacy Patterning Past Orientation Bad memories Good memories Memory Imagination Belief System All narrative comes from our emotional orientation
Perceived Reality Object/Event The Hierarchy of Emotions Affected Perception/ Emotions Recognition Socially Related Emotions Varied (Socially Constructed) Mix of Complex Emotions Emotions Loyalty, Sympathy, Pride, Humility, Confident, Achievement, Embarrassment, Indignation, Bewilderment, Pity, Elation, Satisfaction, Boredom, Shame, Disgust, Frustration, Conscious Surprise, etc. Unconscious Core Emotions Core Emotions Anxious, Happiness, Guilt, Greed, Envy, Depression, Hope, Interest, etc. Primal Emotions Deep Inner SelfFear, Anger Sadness, Pleasant UnpleasantLoss, Hate, Joy, Pain, Pleasure, Curiosity, Deep Subconscious: Self-esteem, self-efficacy, Feeling of hopelessness, Low Frustration tolerance, Sexual Desire, etc. Awfulness, etc. Leftover from Primal Emotions Evolution
Our personality is a mix of emotions just like Milton the Monster
What Emotions are they feeling? Courage Passionate intimidated Nervous Energetic Determined Excited AnxiousOverwhelmed Competitive Challenging Green are positive, Red are negative and yellow emotions can go either way
Courage The different sets of emotions will heavily influence performance. Passionate intimidatedDetermined EnergeticOverwhelmed Anxious Challenging
Different weight and balance of emotions may“Big-headed” produce different behaviour & performance Confused Awkward Tense ScaredOverwhelmed ShyPassionate Confident Excited
Level of Awareness In control of The anxiety line emotion Individual Overwhelmed Sea of Emotion in emotion
ExerciseRelax, breath in andout, remove all yourthoughts, relax your musclesWhere am “I”?
Empathy ExerciseSome people don’t realize we are doing destructive things that hurt others . Sometimes this hurt can lead to grave and serious illness. If we switch our self from the usual “I am” to a different viewpoint, i.e., the feeling of being superior, equal, or inferior to another, from one of these viewpoints we can generate new sets of emotions. For example, if we take a superior view point to others we may generate intensive highhandedness. If we view others as equals we may generate feelings of jealousy and competitiveness, and if we view others from an inferior position, we may generate feelings of jealousy and envy. This helps us see the perspectives of our false sense of ourselves and the source of our behaviours. If we can substitute humility for our emotions (humility does not mean subservience or inferiority), we can see our relationships without the emotional intensities that existed before. We can see our inter-connectiveness, how our actions hurt people, and how we stray from our innate morality. In a group one person share a story where emotions have dominated their judgments and with the group come up with alternative sets of thoughts that may lead to new sets of emotions.
InterpersonalCommunication A brief look atTransactional Analysis Murray Hunter (with the narratives supplied by my organization behaviour students at University Malaysia Perlis
Parent Parent Ego State Behaviours, thoughts and feelings copied from parents and parent figures. Adult Ego State Adult Behaviours, thoughts and feelings are direct responses to here and now. Child Ego State Child Behaviours, thoughts and feelings are replayed from childhood.
Watch the following conversationbetween two students (or film clip) anddetermine the transactional dynamics of the conversation (i.e., parent-parent, Adult-Adult, Child-Child, Parent- Adult, or Parent-child).
The field is a sphere or plain of social life where each person or agent isoperating within it according to a practical logic with the objective ofachieving some end. The field can be a society, a village, a market, anindustry, an organization or any other social structure.A person’s power to influence or dominate the field depends upon theamount and type of capital they possess in relation to other agents. ToBourdieu the concept of capital was much wider than financial resources.Four types of capital exist;Economic capital – access to money, buildings, plant and equipment, etc,Cultural capital – knowledge which equips the social agent with empathytoward for, or appreciation for, or competence working within the culturalrules and norms within the field,Social capital – consisting of resources obtainable through connectionsand group networks, andSymbolic capital – which include socially derived symbols like universitydegrees, or acceptance by social institutions within the field (Drummond1998, P. 104).
The field as a social sphere has its own set of practical logic, producing a habitusembodied with the logic making it uniquely suited to operate within it. Due tosocial background and social grounding through families and education, ahabitus will be more predisposed to operate in certain fields rather than othersor the field will draw the person with the appropriate habitus to play the gamein that field. This is an explanation of why it is difficult for people to move intobusinesses outside fields their habitus is not conditioned to. The modusoperandi of the field is foreign and the agent does not have the necessarypractical logic within their habitus, or the necessary capital to gain any influencewithin the field.Given the relationship between the habitus and the field, it can be seen thatthe social structure (field) produces the mental structure (habitus), thatproduce social structure (field), that produce mental structure (habitus), thatproduce social structure (field). Everybody is unaware of this process as theyare within it. Therefore the individual’s rationality is a social boundedphenomenon where our practical logic, disposition towards toperceptions, appreciation, view of the world, and action content is createdthrough experience within a social structure.
The habitus can generate new principals of strategy and practice that flowfrom experiences that produce it, taking into account of specific social contentwithin the field the individual is playing in (Boudieu 1991, P.14).When the habitus is in line with the field and vice versa, a coherent logic ofpractice develops. This logic is called doxa. Doxa is the basic belief and valuesystem of the habitus where it accepts its social position and place in theworld. Doxa operates at the pre-conscious level.
Alan Fiske The Four ElementaryTypes of Relationships
Emergent In a stance of anticipation A narrative of action and forming meaning
Compresses time In a stance of learningReflective A narrative of significance of the meaning involved
Emergent there maybe emphasis on anxiety andthe significance of making an important commitment.In a reflective mode there maybe an emphasis on the joy of the occasion. Different modes willproduce different sets of meanings. In reflective narrativemany people try to justify their past decisions. In The emergent versionemergent analysis more of The reflective version may be full of anxiety the uncertainty of the may be about the joy of and uncertainty about situations are apparent. the occassion commitment
Through Narrative we can see: Values The types of Construction of relationships ethicsInfluences Beliefs Intentions Motivations What they see & how they see Thinking A Person’s View if the things Processes world Assumptions What they Self efficacy Self View espouse/wh & esteem at they do Biases Emotions How Sequences Level of decisions are awareness made Past or What they respect future orientation Through their stories
Where can we use Narrative?• In the classroom – aid to learning/understanding• Research – developing descriptive theory• Marketing – Branding & advertising• Entrepreneurship research (The Republic of Tea)• Organizational Analysis• Political analysis• Social analysis• Self & Identity• Cognition & Creativity Research
A Narrative Meta-Theory NARRATIVE The Theory of Action by Ricouer EMOTION Self Awareness Mode Murray Hunter TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS The Transactional Theory by Eric Berne ARTIFACT The Model of Organizational VALUE Culture by Edgar Schein ASSUMPTION
Map Out the Big Picture of the Research Phenomena
Making Sense of Narrative is Very Similar to Undertaking English Comprehension Exercises (with extra “meaning tools”)
Emotional orientation Suspicious No distribution of information Centralized decision making Lack of definite strategy Centralized decisions Rigid Unplanned strategy Paranoid Narrow Vision Shallowness Traditional Narcissistic Obsessive-Recklessness Compulsive Balanced Organization Excessive risk taking Attention- Inconsistent strategy Schizoid Seeking Inconsistent Centralized decisions Political decisions (Dramatic) Unplanned expansion Poor leadership Climate of suspicion Depressive Potential Leaderless & apathetic Behaviour Excessive caution & conservatism Rigidity Lack of vision & strategy Weak competitiveness
Transactional Analysis(A framework to communicate)
Person “A” “I” & “Me” Words, phrases, met Person “B” “I” & “Me” View of the world aphors, analogies View of the world Dominant Narrative Values Emotions Beliefs Similarity AssumptionsThe Dialogue or conflict
Analysis of a Khmer TaleThis story is extracted from Collection of Folk Story, vol. 4, published by Buddhist Institute, Phnom Penh, 1966,p.1-10, and is translated to English by DavidChandler, Facing the Cambodian Past,1996, First ed. Silkworm Books Chang Mai,p.79-81
Yama Buddha The organization The basic ambiguity, development tools required complexity, & uncertainty Death to leave the influence of the of the environment Require realms innovation & Existence Ignorance adaptation necessary Organization capabilities to start-up change The realm of the Deva Success in the past, arrogant, in denial, blind to the environment, Rebirth Karma irrelevant to the market, Usually learning is Setting large companies in stable paramount to organization The realm of the Preta environments The realm of the Azura change trajectory High growth high profit Realms or “states of mind” Ambitious, aggressive, orientation, trend setters, of an organization outwardly pious, win-lose compulsive, can lose focus on strategies, suspicious, vigilant, long term strategies, usually suits organizations in conglomerates. dynamic environments. Consciousness Physical, Craving emotion & The firming of intellectual values, beliefsSelf interest The realm of the Triyangyoni The realm of the Manusya energy and perception Short-term orientation, rent Paradoxical, hope yet doubt, high seeking, no innovation, The basic paradoxes an aspirations, willing to experiment but get lost in process, able to no investment, impulsive organization faces learn, can be non-conformist, decision making, nepotistic, suitable for organizations usually production The realm of Naraka engaged in highly Attachment orientated Sense of low self-efficacy and technical tasks. Name & To the past or organizations. failure, depression, hopelessness, Form the future little control over environment, not Paths & much interest in anything, no market rigidities orientation, usually firms in declining industries. Perception Senses Evaluation & The ability to The “cognitive action adapt Contact processes” of an Awareness of organization potential opportunities
Little by little, the girls take to eating their food raw. Upset by this, they try to goback to her mother, but she thinks they are lying to her. She chases them back tothe forest.At the pond when they return, the smouldering wood has gone out but some ofthe corn has begun to grow. The girls eat it raw, along with shellfish, as theguardian spirit has directed them to do. For three months, the spirit keeps wildanimals away from the children and the pond, and after six months, the girls hadgrown downy feathers all over their bodies, and their arms had turned into wings.They could fly onto branches now, and their new claws could grip the branches orpluck fruit…Their lips narrowed into beaks, and they lost their ability to talk. Intheir hearts, all the same, they knew they were people, not animals, even if whenthey tried to talk, they had animals’ voices.Meanwhile their mother’s second husband had been sent to prison. The motherrepents and comes to redeem her daughters. Even though they are birds, she canstill recognize them, and she follows them deeper and deeper into theforest, while they call out to her, “We are released from our humanity; we haveturned into animals, and we are far more beautiful. Don’t come near us!” themother hears only the phrase koun lok (“child of the world,” translated as“humanity”). She runs on after them, runs out of breath and dies.
This story metaphorically reveals the mysteries of life, ourreal selves and social interaction. Key words, which couldbe used to convey these meanings include:mind/body, interaction, clinging/repelling, order/disorder, pleasant/unpleasant, and some-thing more, associatedwith terms like process, change, contiguity, and adaptiveability, etc. This story shows us the possibility of conflictwithin each individual, conflict between individual andindividual, and also social conflicts, as well as the enginethat produces reality for each individual and society, andthe way this engine works. Through this story, we can seehow the dynamics of interaction plays a critical role inshaping our reality.
While Charles Darwin tried to explain how animals evolved to behumans, this story explains how humans can evolve to be animals.1. In row 1 the girls are touched by the bonding relationship betweenthemselves and their parents. They experience a bonding relationship whenboth mother and father are favoured parents, providing them withlove, care, and support that they are attached to. This bonding providesmeaning to the girls’ lives, which determine realities for them.2. In row 2 the girls are touched by the defective bonding relation betweenthe girls to their parents. The absence of the father from the family leavesmother as a widow to struggle with work so that she can feed the family.There is a break in the bonding relationship between the girls and theirmother. The relationship between the mother and her second husbandmark a serious threat to the bonding relationship between the mother andher children. Finally the mother decides to abandon the girls since the girlsare considered as obstacles to the bonding relationship between motherand the second husband. Here is the point that human creature’scharacteristics is thus: when one clings to one thing, one repels anotherthing that is an obstacle to his or her clinging.
3. In row 3 the abandoned girls suffer from a defective bondingrelationship. To them life in the forest, in which their bondingrelationship to mother, to their selves, that used to be the shelterfor life, are severed, is like breaking their souls and bodies intopieces. The more fear of the forest they have the more they recalltheir experience at home with parents that used to be their wombof security. The more they try to repel their situation in the forestthe more they try to restore the bonding relationship, their shelter.As the result of that attempt the more they suffer from theconflicts caused by these opposing forces that break theirpersonalities into pieces. Finally to survive the girls are determinedto adapt to the situation in the forest. They eat raw food. Whiletheir interactions with human culture are severed, little by littlethe girls begin to meld themselves to the forest through theirinteractions with the forest creatures in a way that little by littletheir cultural links to humanness are eroded.
4. In row 4 the fragmentary souls of the girls touched with humanness, are reconfiguredthrough interactions with the forest. The girls adopt human personalities modified by theirwild life. The girls lose their ability with language, the very medium for human production andculture transmission. Little by little the girls’s behaviour and personalities change to half-human-half-animal beings, which are waiting to become completely animal like. When theybecome completely animal they repel the state of being human. However, during the time ofevolution the girls suffer from the conflicts between opposing forces that determine theirrealities and way of life, such as their struggles against the distinction between humannessand animality that are modifying their personalities and behaviours.5. In columns 1, and 2, it is clear that the personalities of the girls and the mother changeaccording to the context in which they interact. Meanings assigned to every one depend onthe way individuals interact. The reality for the girls changes from happy children to unhappychildren, from unhappy girls to animals. These are determined by social interaction, likewisepersonality and behaviour of the mother. Without her relationship to her second husband themother would have assigned a good meaning to her daughters. With her relationship to hersecond husband, her daughters become obstacles for her. When repelled by the secondhusband, she realised that her daughters are important to her.Extracted from: Hel Rithy (2004) DependentOrigination: Towards a Theory of Meaning
Any reality is only seen in themind and therefore really part of our imagination
Most people have (sourcesof) multiple identities wheresome are easier than others to discover and appreciate.
Follow the relationships Types Conflicts Shared meanings Who controls the narrative?
It is impossible for us to see thingsuntouched by our own view, since theobserver and the observed are within the same entity - Margaret Mead
It is the theory that determines what we can observe - Albert Einstein
The Tools of Trade Syntax Creative sensitivity Comprehension SkillsMetaphor Template and Trap Empathy Theories
Ability to see the environment in different ways No Sensitivity High SensitivityOpenness to novelty – the ability to reason with relatively novel forms of stimuli,Alertness to distinction – the ability to distinguish minute differences in thedetails of an object, action, or environment,Sensitivity to different contexts- tasks and abilities will differ according to thesituational context,Awareness of multiple perspectives – the ability to think dialectically, andOrientation in the present- paying attention to here and now.