GUÍA PARA PADRES PARA LA PREVENCIÓN DE LA HOMOSEXUALIDAD.
The Zionist Agenda Part I
1. The Zionist Agenda Part I
Exclusive to Rense.com
Commentary By Ted Lang
1-14-7
Zionism can now be defined as the political movement which wraps
and camouflages itself in the Jewish faith, having as its primary
mission the destruction of all sovereign national governments, religions
and social structures with the objective of removing these obstacles to
the establishment of a one world global government: the "New World
Order."
Zionism is also the belief in the "Jewish" state, the primary one being
the United States, and of secondary significance, the state of Israel.
The latter will serve as the "trigger" to provoke World War III by
inciting belligerent political and religious interests in the Middle East
to war against each other. Thus, by taking advantage of the competing
hostile religious and political divides in the region, the military chaos
that could be launched and the horrific world war that would follow,
leaves but only one way out for the human race. Mankind will then
come to realize that its salvation can come only through a beneficent
New World Order government. Predecessors of the NWO are, of
course, The League of Nations and the UN.
The Zionist agenda can be attributed as the chief contributing causal
factors behind virtually every war on the planet since 1776, especially
those involving US. And although it was a revelation, when only a
short time ago I first came to realize the Zionist fingerprints all over
our very own American Revolution and nation's first war, I am now
aware of Zionism's continued and intensified involvement in our
second war, the War of 1812. In fact, all our wars after 1776 were not
only engineered by Zionists, but can also be shown to be
interconnected to each other via the cult of powerful international
Zionist bankers. The Zionist bankers, headed by the international
House of Rothschild-Rockefeller, have deliberately incited global
conflicts and then made astonishing profits funding both sides of the
conflicts they created.
Zionism can be shown to be a product of Jewish origin, and these
2. origins have been "thoroughly studied" by Professor Kevin
MacDonald, a psychologist at Cal-State. He briefly articulates the
origins of Zionism using the presently accepted and politically correct
euphemism of "neoconservatism." As MacDonald has offered in his
September 18, 2003 essay, written for V-Dare.com entitled, "Thinking
About Neoconservatism," he states, "there is nothing conservative
about their goals." I would hasten to add that there is nothing new
about their agenda either; nor is their agenda in any way shape or form
"American." It is called neoconservatism, but it is really one thing
only:
Zionism! And there is authoritative source material that offers viable
arguments that Zionist Jews aren't really Jews at all, but an Asiatic race
originating from a land formerly identified as Khazar in the country
known today as Georgia. The population was "converted" to Judaism
merely because their king had converted in 720 A.D.
Zionism, through its founder, Theodor Herzl, charges Jews with his
vision as offered in his book "The Jewish State" (1896): "We are one
people!" What is meant by this is that although Jewish people may
have divergent interests, backgrounds and goals, Zionism charges all
Jews to put their differences behind themrecognizing that they are
different from all other people. This serves to create the double-edge
sword that is Zionism; 1) all Jews are both Zionists and Jews; and 2)
Jews are a race, thereby justifying the charge of "racism" to be used
against anyone and everyone who questions Zionism. It justifies the
use of the racist term "anti-Semite."
But Zionism is not a religion; it is a political agenda. Political agendas
are normally the product of a state, or at least are intended to result in
state action. The latter characteristic approach launching political
agendas via state mandate is usually the product of a secret, or
powerful and possibly even a dangerous cabal that represents only the
interests of their own group. This is usually in conflict with the best
interests of either the national population, or possibly Mankind in
general.
Zionism defends itself against its critics with racist-based charges of
anti-Semitism purely because Zionists reserve for themselves the right
to hide behind their adopted sovereignty of being a "nation" of people
and the nation of "Israel." They offer that all Jews are a nation, but
when convenient or deemed necessary, they invoke their "religion" to
stave off criticism and analytical inquiry.
3. Are Jews BOTH a race and a religion? Is there such a thing as the
"Protestant Race," or the "Catholic Race"? Can there be, therefore,
such a thing as the "Jewish Race"? Depending upon the circumstances
or the nature of inquiry or criticism, Zionists will either cry "religious
persecution" or "racial discrimination" as a defense. These charges are
consistently offered after they, Zionists, first perpetrate the persecution
of others, and when it is they who first initiate racial discrimination
towards others, most notably in the form of mass murder and acts of
terrorism against the Palestinians and other Middle Eastern nations.
They then cry anti-Semitism when questioned, defending their
indefensible actions clearly recognized as such by the world. They
insist that their "nation" has a right to exist, as they deny other nations
that very same right.
Examining further MacDonald's V-Dare piece, he provides a hyperlink
promoting his book, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary
Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and
Political Movements. MacDonald promotes what I feel is the standard
refutation of the connectivity of a Zionist conspiracy, when he offers as
its basic defense the disparity of Jewish cultural and intellectual
diversity and the resultant conflicting points of view. To be fair, I have
not read either the book or any additional evaluation of the contents
therein; but I focus on this vignette to make the point of the common
error that is always resurrected to defeat the "conspiracy theory."
MacDonald writes: "There is no implication here of a unified Jewish
'conspiracy' to undermine gentile culture, as portrayed in the notorious
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Since the Enlightenment, Judaism has
never been a unified, monolithic movement, and there has clearly been
a great deal of disagreement among Jews as to how to protect
themselves and attain their interests during this period. The movements
discussed in this volume (Boasian anthropology, political radicalism,
psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School of Social Research, and the New
York Intellectuals) were advanced by relatively few individuals whose
views may not have been known or understood by the majority of the
Jewish community. The argument is that Jews dominated these
intellectual movements, that a strong sense of Jewish identity was
characteristic of the great majority of these individuals, and that these
individuals were pursuing a Jewish agenda in establishing and
participating in these movements."
MacDonald does not examine, at least as far as I am aware due to my
ignorance of his total efforts, the connection between Mayer
Rothschild, the patriarch of the Rothschild dynasty, and Adam
Weisshaupt, the founder of a satanic cult calling themselves the
4. "Illuminati." It is believed that Rothschild encouraged or plotted with
Weisshaupt for the Illuminati's infiltration of the Freemasons. Rank
and file Freemasons are unaware of the satanic aspect of their
organization, yet the connection between the rich and powerful
Rothschilds, Weisshaupt, the Freemasons and Zionism is foolish to
ignore. And although the connection has been brought to the fore by
such as Dr. Henry Makow, the term "Illuminati" is simply too mystical
and to colorful to believe, especially when denigrated by the towering
intellects "who don't believe in conspiracy theories." The term
"International Zionist bankers" offers a more believable base providing
easier investigation and analysis.
Any connections to these theories, even those supported by factual,
hard evidence, are then pounced upon by the Zionist network of liars,
frauds, dirt and smear mongers, journalistic charlatans and other
propagandists, and are decried as examples of "frauds" and "forgeries."
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are, but of course, a "forgery."
Never mind that they are on exhibit in the British Museum the curators
are obviously too stupid and have been duped. And "Hitler's bankers"
are another fraud. And Israel's attack on the U.S.S. Liberty never
happened, and 34 of our Navy personnel weren't really killed in that act
of war. Everybody else is lying, but never the Zionists. They never lie
or persecute or discriminate against anyone. That is why they need
"hate crimes" protection!
MacDonald seems to have fallen into the same Zionist trap that befalls
most critics of "Judaism." Let's think about that for a moment. Let's
reflect for a moment on Hitler's views of the "Jewish bankers" who
betrayed Germany via the Versailles Treaty. Let's reflect upon Mel
Gibson's outburst while in an inebriated state blaming all the world's
wars on "Jews." How about Henry Ford in his Zionist "451"-banned
book, The International Jew? It can be shown that "Jews" were clearly
identified as being heavily involved in both initiating World War I and
in cutting up all the pieces of the Versailles victory pie for themselves.
To be sure, "Jews" presided over both the beginnings of World War I,
as well as in its spoils, one of them being the guarantee of a "Jewish
state" in the captured Ottoman territory identified as Palestine. But
were these "Jews" really Jews, or were they in fact Zionists? Failing to
separate the two designations is what discredits Hitler, Ford, Gibson,
Lindbergh, Mearsheimer, Walt, Judt, Freedman, and now probably
even former President Jimmy Carter.
I fear that the genre of "conspiracy theory" dismissal rhetoric offered
by such as Professor MacDonald, misses badly on the real driver that
should be at the heart of any discussion involving the international
