Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Decentralized and Open Organizations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Decentralized and Open Organizations

439
views

Published on

In this class we delved into the work of Clay Shirky (Here Comes Everybody) and Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom (The Starfish and the Spider), and looked at the rise of "starfish" organizations that are …

In this class we delved into the work of Clay Shirky (Here Comes Everybody) and Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom (The Starfish and the Spider), and looked at the rise of "starfish" organizations that are taking advantage of the Internet's affordances. We closed the class with a discussion of Mark Pesce's work on "hyperpolitics" and "hyperempowerment."

Published in: Technology, Health & Medicine

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
439
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. DPI-665 Politics of the Internet Feb 27, 2012 “ The Potential of Decentralized and Open Organizations” Micah L. Sifry Audio: http://bit.ly/yRqV2W CC-BY-NC-SA
  • 2. Topics for discussion
    • What is the dilemma of collective action, and how does the Internet help resolve this dilemma?
    • What are other examples of “Starfish” organizations?
    • Do open, decentralized organizations lack leaders?
  • 3. Here Comes Everybody
    • What happens when the cost of communicating and collaborating drops and the speed increases?
    • -Lateral connections, “shared awareness” take off (lay Catholics, airline passengers)
    • -Small groups + urge to share isn’t new; scale is
    • -Social tools don’t create collective action--they merely remove the obstacles to it
    • -Tech change + strategy on how to use
  • 4. The Starfish and the Spider
    • Centralized vs decentralized orgs
    • -Record companies vs P2P file-sharing platforms
    • -The Spanish vs the Apache
  • 5. Starfish organizations
    • No one in charge
    • No HQ
    • No head to kill
    • Amorphous division of roles
    • If you take out a unit, the org is unharmed
    • Knowledge/power is distributed
    • Org is flexible
    • Units are self-funding
    • Can’t count the participants
    • Working groups communicate laterally
  • 6. Other “Starfish”
    • Alcoholics Anonymous
    • Craigslist.org
    • The Tea Party
    • Occupy Wall Street
    • Do these open, decentralized organizations lack leaders??
  • 7. Hyperpolitics?
    • Mobile phones in the hands of 5B+
    • Hyperconnectivity + hypermimesis = hyperempowerment?
    • Are we heading into a digital state of nature?
    • Collisions between hierarchic and networked systems rising? (cf, Anonymous)
    • Or can they find ways to work together?
  • 8. The Internet’s Unlit Fuse
    • What didn’t happen in 2004: real expansion of local group coordination
    • “ The Bush campaign used the Internet brilliantly to connect supporters to voters in their precincts and to give them a clear message to deliver (unlike Kerry), but not for creating new communities. The Dean campaign used the Internet to create new offline communities, but not in Iowa where it mattered most. And the Kerry campaign and MoveOn chose not to create new communities at all.” -- Zephyr Teachout
  • 9. Due Wednesday, 3rd blog post
    • Discuss the readings covered between Feb 15-27
    • Evaluate the potential or pitfalls of open, decentralized organization by focusing on at least one case (either from the readings or a related example)

×