Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Intrallect March09
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Intrallect March09

474

Published on

This presentation looks at developing an integrated repository for Leeds Met comprising an Open Access research archive and a repository of reusable learning objects. …

This presentation looks at developing an integrated repository for Leeds Met comprising an Open Access research archive and a repository of reusable learning objects.

From the outset, the project team recognised that intraLibrary lacked functionality essential to an OA research archive, specifically; a publicly accessible search interface. Development work has therefore focussed on developing a suitable interface based on the SRU protocol and configuring a suitable metadata template within intraLibrary. We also consider differentiation and appropriate presentation of discrete types of content by the SRU interface and implementation of the OAI-PMH and XML sitemaps to aid discoverability of research material.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
474
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. IntraLibrary for Research Outputs Wendy Luker and Nick Sheppard Leeds Metropolitan University
  • 2. Background <ul><li>Funded by JISC as a Repository Start-Up project </li></ul><ul><li>Started with institutional needs analysis </li></ul><ul><li>User engagement is key to success, but does create issues… </li></ul>Research Learning objects Extensible to future needs … Open access Fit to existing infrastructure Open source vs commercial package
  • 3. Why IntraLibrary? <ul><li>Market place </li></ul><ul><li>Adaptability Learning object repositories might support research, but would a research repository really support learning objects? </li></ul><ul><li>Future proof </li></ul>
  • 4. Two over-riding issues <ul><li>Open Access </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Authentication </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Search Engines </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Metadata </li></ul><ul><ul><li>IEEE UK LOM </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dublin Core </li></ul></ul>
  • 5. SRU interface <ul><li>Intrallect developed SRU client as part of CD-LOR </li></ul><ul><li>Subsequently developed further by IRISS </li></ul><ul><li>Starting point for Leeds Met </li></ul><ul><li>Leeds Met open Search </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Search </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Browse </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information </li></ul></ul>
  • 6. Further development <ul><li>Identify material by content type </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Research / LOs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Integrated interface? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Separate interfaces? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Advanced search </li></ul><ul><li>Number of resources by faculty / subject </li></ul><ul><li>RSS </li></ul>
  • 7. External discovery <ul><li>OAI-PMH </li></ul><ul><li>XML sitemaps </li></ul><ul><li>Cover sheet for full text items </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Copyright </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Link to published version </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Context </li></ul></ul>

×