The Neo Con Agenda

Slide 1: The Neo-Con Agenda The Globalist’s Right Hand Men.

Slide 2: Globalism has two sides: The Roman God Janus.

Slide 3: Lets talk about the Right Side. The Planet Saturn (Satan) has a moon named after Janus. Notice that only half of it is visible to the human eye.

Slide 4: Charles Krauthammer: At the close of 1989, Charles Krauthammer, one of the  best-known neocon columnists, published a piece entitled “Universal Dominion,” in which he argued that America should work for “a qualitatively new outcome--a unipolar world.”8 In 1990, he argued that unipolarity has already arrived and that the United States, being the “unchallenged superpower,” should act unilaterally. Saying that “[t]he alternative to unipolarity is chaos,” Krauthammer explained what unipolarity requires of the United States: “unashamedly laying down the rules of world order and being prepared to enforce them.”9 The following year, in an argument for a “robust interventionism,” he said of this unipolar world: “We Americans should like it---and exploit it.”10

Slide 5: You Probably Read His Commentaries in the Deseret News.

Slide 6: Project for a New American Century The most important development within the neocon  movement in the 1990s was William Kristol’s founding, in 1997, of a unipolarist think tank called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).34 Closely related to the American Enterprise Institute ideologically and even physically and financially, PNAC differed primarily in focusing entirely on foreign policy.35 In its “Statement of Principles,” PNAC called for “American global leadership,” asking whether the United States has “the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests.”36

Slide 7: Cheney, Libby and Rumsfeld What is said in the PNAC’s documents is highly important  because many of PNAC’s early members, including Elliott Abrams, John Bolton, Eliot Cohen, Paula Dobriansky, Zalmay Khalilzad, Richard Perle, Peter W. Rodman, James Woolsey, and---most significantly---Cheney, Libby, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz, became central members of the new Bush administration. PNAC neocons thereby took key positions in the Vice President’s Office, the Pentagon, and the (only semi-independent) Defense Policy Board. They did so well primarily because of Cheney, who was put in charge of the transition team, and secondarily because of Rumsfeld, after Cheney chose him to head the Pentagon.38

Slide 8: Long Before 9/11 one Neo-con Stated “If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World  Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force.93”

Slide 9: Just Like Ancient Rome… America would have to abandon its  “Republic”; Constitution and Bill of Rights to become a Global Empire.

Slide 10: Brzezinski in 1997: “America is too democratic at home to be  autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. . . . The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”

Slide 11: In 2007: “A plausible scenario for a military  collision with Iran,” Brzezinski suggested, involves “a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a ‘defensive’ U.S. military action against Iran.” Adding that a “mythical historical narrative” for an expanded attack on Islamic countries “is already being articulated,” Brzezinski said that “9/11 [is being presented] as the equivalent of the Pearl Harbor attack.”110

Slide 12: So, What Happens Next?

Slide 13: We Could ask Joe Cannon… .

Slide 14: He Does Sit on the Board of the American Enterprise Institute… . With funding from conservative foundations and large corporations, AEI is one of the richest and most influential think tanks in the U.S. Areas of concern include both foreign and domestic policy, including global warming. AEI promotes neo-conservative ideals and has close ties to the current Bush Administration. On February 26, 2003 President Bush was the key-note speaker at the American Enterprise Institute. He enthused that, at AEI, \"Some of the finest minds of our nation are at work on some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my administration has borrowed twenty such minds. I want to thank them for their service\" ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond is on the AEI board of trustees.

Slide 15: Funded By Rockefeller… ExxonMobil (Standard Oil) gave AEI approximately $925,000 between 1998 and 2003.

Slide 16: And led by the Neo-cons. Newt Gingrich, Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Jeane Kirkpatrick

Slide 17: Which Explains Why… North Korea, Iran pose scary nuclear threat By Joseph A. Cannon Deseret Morning News As a nation, we are so absorbed and disillusioned with the war in Iraq that we may be missing crucial developments in North Korea and Iran, two other fronts in the war against terror. Worse, our will to fight may be so weakened that our ability to respond to these threats is compromised.

Slide 18: The Deseret News Is a Neo-con Rag… Following the Globalist Agenda. 

Slide 19: And Why…. Dr. Steven Jones was Fired From BYU.

Slide 20: For Publicly Stating that 9/11 was an “Inside Job!” .

Slide 21: And Why: Rockefeller/Exxon donated only  $28,000 to BYU in 2003 and over $141,531 in 2006. (Harvard got $169,476 in 2006)

Slide 22: And Why: The LDS Church joined the World  Council of Churches (est. in 1948 to explore doctrinal similarities and differences). The World Council of Churches grew out of two post-World War I ecumenical efforts, the Life and Work Movement (which concentrated on practical activities) and the Faith and Order Movement (which focused on doctrinal issues and the possibility of reunion of all Christian Religions.)

Slide 23: And Why: You Better Start Wondering Why.