SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
Learning Outcomes:
Topic: Cosmological Argument
Find the
meanings!
Infinite regress
Cosmos
Ex Nihilo
A posteriori
Inductive
You will need your text books to help
you answer these first questions.
Scan the QR code.
MUST: define and describe the main key terminology
SHOULD: explain Aquinas’ three ways and ask relevant questions
COULD: Interpret quotes and analyse Aquinas’ 3 ways
SO THAT:
I can demonstrate knowledge and
understanding (A01)
Create and record a mini revision
podcast on Aquinas 3 ways
(informative or as an interview/
hotseat
Upload this to the AS Philosophy
Blog
Write down 5
examples of cause
and effect. Ask
your partner to
define a key term
Aquinas’s 3
Ways
Example
(Diagram/
picture)
Explanation
Any
additional
information
Hume’s
response
MOTION OR
CHANGE
CAUSE
CONTINGENCY
Use the textbook
to produce an A3
table (as above)
with some depth!
“A may be explained by B, and B
by C, but in the end there will be
some one object on whom all
other objects depend.”
Swinburne 1996
What did he mean by this?
What might an atheist say in
response? What do you think?
Watch
www.youtube.com/watch
?v=w4AHFBft2L8
What is William Lane Craig
suggesting and how does
it link to the Cosmological
argument?
Go on our blog and write a comment
in response to, ‘it is acceptable to
have infinite regression”
It should demonstrate what you have
learnt so far.
The Cosmological Argument
MUST: define and describe the main key terminology
SHOULD: explain Aquinas’ three ways and ask relevant questions
COULD: Interpret quotes and analyse Aquinas’ 3 ways
Starter:
Mind map what you can remember about the
Prime Mover, particularly with regard to its
relationship with the World
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument is the umbrella
term given to 3 separate arguments by Aquinas-
the first three of his five ways to prove God’s
existence. REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU ARE
WRITING AN ESSAY ON IT!
Your Task
Today, in pairs you are going to be completing a
learning mat. You will all be given a sheet of
paper and your task is to complete the activities
on the sheet of paper to develop your
knowledge.
The Cosmological Argument
Russell Vs. Copleston
The
Principle
of
Sufficient
Reason
In order to understand the debate
between Russell and Coplestone you
need to be aware of Leibniz’s Principle
of Sufficient Reason.
He stated:
‘in virtue of which we hold that no fact
could ever be true of or existent, nor
statement correct, unless there were a
sufficient reason why it was thus and
not otherwise.’
What do you think Leibniz means
here?
The Principle of Sufficient Reason
‘in virtue of which we hold that no fact
could ever be true of or existent, nor
statement correct, unless there were a
sufficient reason why it was thus and
not otherwise.’
Simply put: ‘no fact could ever be
true…unless there were a sufficient
reason why it was…’
Leibniz means that you should be able
to give an explanation of why
something is in order to have a
sufficient explanation.
What is the sufficient reason for…
A kitten…
What is the sufficient reason for…
Fire…
What is the sufficient reason for…
The Universe…
Ext: what are the problems with trying to give a sufficient
reason? How do we know when we have achieved a sufficient
reason?
What is the sufficient reason for the universe
…that no fact could ever be true unless there
were a sufficient reason why it was…
It is not enough to know how the
universe came to exist…we must know
why it exists…
This will give us a sufficient reason.
The Debate
THE ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY
Copleston: Well, for clarity's sake, I'll divide the argument into distinct stages. First of
all, I should say, we know that there are at least some beings in the world which do not
contain in themselves the reason for their existence. For example, I depend on my
parents, and now on the air, and on food, and so on. Now, secondly, the world is
simply the real or imagined totality or aggregate of individual objects, none of which
contain in themselves alone the reason for their existence. There isn't any world
distinct from the objects which form it, any more than the human race is something
apart from the members. Therefore, I should say, since objects or events exist, and
since no object of experience contains within itself reason of its existence, this reason,
the totality of objects, must have a reason external to itself. That reason must be an
existent being. Well, this being is either itself the reason for its own existence, or it is
not. If it is, well and good. If it is not, then we must proceed farther. But if we proceed
to infinity in that sense, then there's no explanation of existence at all. So, I should say,
in order to explain existence, we must come to a being which contains within itself the
reason for its own existence, that is to say, which cannot not exist.
1. According to Copleston, what is the only ‘sufficient reason’ for the universe?
2. In what way(s) is this similar to Aquinas’ argument from contingency?
THE ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY
Copleston:
P1: we know that there are at least some beings in the world which do not
contain in themselves the reason for their existence.
P2: the world is simply the real or imagined totality or aggregate of individual
objects, none of which contain in themselves alone the reason for their
existence.
P3: since objects or events exist, and since no object of experience contains
within itself reason of its existence, this reason, the totality of objects, must
have a reason external to itself.
C1: That reason must be an existent being.
C2: Well, this being is either itself the reason for its own existence, or it is not.
If it is, well and good. If it is not, then we must proceed farther. But if we
proceed to infinity in that sense, then there's no explanation of existence at
all. So, I should say, in order to explain existence, we must come to a being
which contains within itself the reason for its own existence, that is to say,
which cannot not exist.
Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason
• Aquinas and Copleston agree that the key to
the success of the argument from contingency
relies on the acceptance of God being the
only sufficient reason for the existence of the
universe.
• Both Copleston and Aquinas argue that the
universe can only be sufficiently explained by
reference to God.
Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason
• For Aquinas and Copleston, God (as a necessary
being) is the only sufficient reason for the universe.
• This is because without a necessary being there
would only ever be contingent beings…and of course
it is not logical to suggest that contingent beings can
cause themselves.
• Thus without God there would be no universe.
What do you think Aquinas and Copleston mean by a ‘necessary being’.
How does a necessary being provide us with a ‘sufficient reason’?
Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason
• The necessary being, God, according to the
Cosmological Argument provides us with a sufficient
reason as to why there is something rather than
nothing.
Step 2: What is a Sufficient Reason?
• Russell questions ‘what do you mean by sufficient
reason? You don’t mean cause?’.
• He is challenging Copleston’s position by questioning
why God must be the sufficient cause.
• He asks ‘when is an explanation adequate?’ and uses
the example of making a flame with a match.
• What Russell is proposing is that there is no need to
look to the argument from contingency (GOD) when
trying to fulfil Leibniz’s principle and when trying to
provide an explanation of the universe.
Step 2: What is a Sufficient Reason?
• In response to Russell, Copleston states ‘an adequate
explanation must ultimately be a total explanation,
to which nothing further can be added’.
Q. How does God fulfil this definition of a sufficient
reason?
Q. Can you think of any alternative reasons for the
universe that we could identify as ‘sufficient’?
Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason?
• Russell responds by saying that ‘you’re looking for
something which can’t be got, and which one ought
not to expect to get’.
Q. What do you think Russell means here?
Q. Why might he say this?
Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason?
• Russell is suggesting that it is not possible to reach a ‘sufficient
reason’ for the universe.
• He basis this on his empirical/agnostic stance. He maintains
that as the reason is beyond human experience we can never
gain a sufficient reason for the existence of the universe.
• ‘I should say that the universe is just there and that is
all’.
1. What are your thoughts on this perspective?
2. Is Russell justified in saying that we cannot gain knowledge of
that which is beyond our understanding?
3. Does this mean that it is meaningless to talk of metaphysics or
even God?
Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason?
• Copleston’s response is…
– To defend the argument from contingency (as previously
explored)
– To call Russell dogmatic- strict/non-flexable
He states ‘if one does not wish to embark on the path which
leads to the affirmation of a transcendent being, however the
latter may be described, one has to deny the reality of the
problem and assert that things ‘just are’ and that the
existential problem in question is just a pseudo-problem. And if
one refuses to even sit down at the chess board and make a
move, one cannot, of course, be checkmated.’
Homework: Reviewing Learning
1. List two facts about a) Russell and b) Copleston.
1. What is Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason?
2. What is a necessary being?
3. Explain one reason why Copleston believes that
God is the only possible sufficient reason for the
universe.
4. Explain one reason why Russell believes that the
universe itself (it ‘just is’) is a sufficient reason.
5. Complete the comic strip

More Related Content

What's hot

6. approaches to working with children
6. approaches to working with children6. approaches to working with children
6. approaches to working with childrenTehreem Anis
 
Evidence Based Practice
Evidence Based PracticeEvidence Based Practice
Evidence Based PracticeSreeraj S R
 
"Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"
 "Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace" "Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"
"Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"Ability Skills Knowledge Fraternity
 
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdf
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdfknowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdf
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdfEgonMoshi
 
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy jitendra jain
 
Visual perception
Visual perceptionVisual perception
Visual perceptiontalha ijaz
 
Scope and aims of physiotherapy
Scope and aims of physiotherapy Scope and aims of physiotherapy
Scope and aims of physiotherapy Sam Shaikh
 
Programming Gym-based sessions L3
Programming Gym-based sessions L3Programming Gym-based sessions L3
Programming Gym-based sessions L3heather13mcfarlane
 
Neurofunctional Approach
Neurofunctional Approach Neurofunctional Approach
Neurofunctional Approach Reina Salazar
 
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We Know
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We KnowCore Training: What We Think vs. What We Know
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We KnowJohn Cissik
 
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical Education
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical EducationEducational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical Education
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical EducationJ. Priyanka
 
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluation
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluationEmergency plan and initial injury evaluation
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluationGallagherC15
 

What's hot (18)

6. approaches to working with children
6. approaches to working with children6. approaches to working with children
6. approaches to working with children
 
Evidence Based Practice
Evidence Based PracticeEvidence Based Practice
Evidence Based Practice
 
"Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"
 "Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace" "Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"
"Physiotherapy approach on Safety body ergonomics at the workplace"
 
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdf
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdfknowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdf
knowledge about kinesiology and biomechanics.pdf
 
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy
Cerebral Palsy :Context verses child focused therapy
 
Occupational performance area
Occupational performance areaOccupational performance area
Occupational performance area
 
Motor control and_learning
Motor control and_learningMotor control and_learning
Motor control and_learning
 
Visual perception
Visual perceptionVisual perception
Visual perception
 
Entrepreneurship for Physiotherapists
Entrepreneurship for PhysiotherapistsEntrepreneurship for Physiotherapists
Entrepreneurship for Physiotherapists
 
Occupational Adaptation Theory
Occupational Adaptation TheoryOccupational Adaptation Theory
Occupational Adaptation Theory
 
Scope and aims of physiotherapy
Scope and aims of physiotherapy Scope and aims of physiotherapy
Scope and aims of physiotherapy
 
Assessment of physical fitness pptx
Assessment of physical fitness  pptxAssessment of physical fitness  pptx
Assessment of physical fitness pptx
 
Physical Assessment in Pediatric Rehabilitation
Physical Assessment in Pediatric RehabilitationPhysical Assessment in Pediatric Rehabilitation
Physical Assessment in Pediatric Rehabilitation
 
Programming Gym-based sessions L3
Programming Gym-based sessions L3Programming Gym-based sessions L3
Programming Gym-based sessions L3
 
Neurofunctional Approach
Neurofunctional Approach Neurofunctional Approach
Neurofunctional Approach
 
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We Know
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We KnowCore Training: What We Think vs. What We Know
Core Training: What We Think vs. What We Know
 
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical Education
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical EducationEducational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical Education
Educational Technology and pedagogy techniques in Physical Education
 
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluation
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluationEmergency plan and initial injury evaluation
Emergency plan and initial injury evaluation
 

Viewers also liked

Cosmological Copleston
Cosmological CoplestonCosmological Copleston
Cosmological Coplestonmrhartley
 
Cosmological Argument
Cosmological ArgumentCosmological Argument
Cosmological Argumentmrhartley
 
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological ArgumentThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological ArgumentEmHope2797
 
Aquinas’ third way
Aquinas’ third wayAquinas’ third way
Aquinas’ third waydesmondtwsa
 
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)eilisbell
 
The cosmological argument
The cosmological argumentThe cosmological argument
The cosmological argumentNightLizard90
 
Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience philipapeters
 
Religious Experience
Religious ExperienceReligious Experience
Religious ExperienceClare Dempsey
 
AP Biopsychology PowerPoint
AP Biopsychology PowerPointAP Biopsychology PowerPoint
AP Biopsychology PowerPointMrTimBradley
 
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand RussellBertrand Russell
Bertrand RussellCody Mims
 
Leadership: Contingency Theory
Leadership: Contingency Theory  Leadership: Contingency Theory
Leadership: Contingency Theory Travis Seepersad
 
Presentacion de bertrand russell
Presentacion de bertrand russellPresentacion de bertrand russell
Presentacion de bertrand russellJanet24dpg
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Cosmological Copleston
Cosmological CoplestonCosmological Copleston
Cosmological Copleston
 
Cosmological Argument
Cosmological ArgumentCosmological Argument
Cosmological Argument
 
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological ArgumentThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument
 
Aquinas’ third way
Aquinas’ third wayAquinas’ third way
Aquinas’ third way
 
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)
2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)
 
The cosmological argument
The cosmological argumentThe cosmological argument
The cosmological argument
 
Contingency theory
Contingency theoryContingency theory
Contingency theory
 
Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience
 
Religious experiences
Religious experiencesReligious experiences
Religious experiences
 
Religious Experience
Religious ExperienceReligious Experience
Religious Experience
 
Rudolf otto
Rudolf ottoRudolf otto
Rudolf otto
 
AP Biopsychology PowerPoint
AP Biopsychology PowerPointAP Biopsychology PowerPoint
AP Biopsychology PowerPoint
 
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand RussellBertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell
 
Leadership: Contingency Theory
Leadership: Contingency Theory  Leadership: Contingency Theory
Leadership: Contingency Theory
 
Presentacion de bertrand russell
Presentacion de bertrand russellPresentacion de bertrand russell
Presentacion de bertrand russell
 

Similar to The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate

Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)
Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)
Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)aaaaaaabbbbbbb2
 
Critique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument EssayCritique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument EssayLaura Hall
 
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of GodThe Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of GodMelissa Luster
 
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...Dr Ian Ellis-Jones
 
Cosmological Argument From Motion
Cosmological Argument From MotionCosmological Argument From Motion
Cosmological Argument From MotionDenise Hudson
 
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...rogerskirk
 
The ontological argument
The ontological argumentThe ontological argument
The ontological argumentTPSMulholland
 
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdf
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdfA Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdf
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdfNaomi Hansen
 
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docx
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docxPHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docx
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docxrandymartin91030
 
Regarding The Cosmological Argument
Regarding The Cosmological ArgumentRegarding The Cosmological Argument
Regarding The Cosmological ArgumentVeronica Smith
 

Similar to The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate (20)

Summary Of The Cosmological Argument
Summary Of The Cosmological ArgumentSummary Of The Cosmological Argument
Summary Of The Cosmological Argument
 
Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)
Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)
Rational belief in god (cosmological arguments for dummies)
 
Thomas aquinas 5
Thomas aquinas 5Thomas aquinas 5
Thomas aquinas 5
 
Divine Certainty.pdf
Divine Certainty.pdfDivine Certainty.pdf
Divine Certainty.pdf
 
A2 Cosmological
A2 CosmologicalA2 Cosmological
A2 Cosmological
 
Cosmological Argument Essay
Cosmological Argument EssayCosmological Argument Essay
Cosmological Argument Essay
 
Critique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument EssayCritique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
 
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of GodThe Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God
The Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God
 
Critique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument EssayCritique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
Critique Of Cosmological Argument Essay
 
Aquinas Cosmological Argument Essay
Aquinas Cosmological Argument EssayAquinas Cosmological Argument Essay
Aquinas Cosmological Argument Essay
 
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...
PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL THEISM: FIVE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE...
 
Descartes Cosmological Argument
Descartes Cosmological ArgumentDescartes Cosmological Argument
Descartes Cosmological Argument
 
Cosmological Argument From Motion
Cosmological Argument From MotionCosmological Argument From Motion
Cosmological Argument From Motion
 
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
 
The ontological argument
The ontological argumentThe ontological argument
The ontological argument
 
Cosmological Argument
Cosmological ArgumentCosmological Argument
Cosmological Argument
 
Pp1
Pp1Pp1
Pp1
 
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdf
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdfA Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdf
A Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.pdf
 
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docx
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docxPHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docx
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE 21sT CENTURY A Comprehensive Reader.docx
 
Regarding The Cosmological Argument
Regarding The Cosmological ArgumentRegarding The Cosmological Argument
Regarding The Cosmological Argument
 

Recently uploaded

What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentation
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentationNurdinova-Domestic Violence presentation
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentationTom Tresser
 
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational Trust
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational TrustVani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational Trust
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational TrustSavipriya Raghavendra
 
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ Project
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ ProjectSocial Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ Project
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ ProjectApostolos Syropoulos
 
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlEBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024Tom Tresser
 
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria Alvarez
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria AlvarezPersonal Brand Exploration- Valeria Alvarez
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria AlvarezValeriaAlvarez967687
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)Pranav Sharma
 
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the Brain
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the BrainLANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the Brain
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the BrainImran Kakar
 
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer set
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer setClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer set
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer setPragya - UEM Kolkata Quiz Club
 
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptx
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptxProtein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptx
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptxvidhisharma994099
 
Empowering Student Engagement with Open Education
Empowering Student Engagement with Open EducationEmpowering Student Engagement with Open Education
Empowering Student Engagement with Open EducationLorna Campbell
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...M56BOOKSTORE PRODUCT/SERVICE
 
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptx
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptxlanguage diversity of the world and india ppt.pptx
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptxvasupavanibhonagiri
 
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.ruchisuryawanshi1234
 
3.28.24 The Poor People's Campaign.pptx
3.28.24  The Poor People's Campaign.pptx3.28.24  The Poor People's Campaign.pptx
3.28.24 The Poor People's Campaign.pptxmary850239
 
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdf
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdfNatural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdf
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdfPranav Sharma
 

Recently uploaded (20)

What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Subcontract Service in Odoo 17 ERP
 
March 2024 Directors Meeting, Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
March 2024 Directors Meeting, Division of Student Affairs and Academic SupportMarch 2024 Directors Meeting, Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
March 2024 Directors Meeting, Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
 
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentation
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentationNurdinova-Domestic Violence presentation
Nurdinova-Domestic Violence presentation
 
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational Trust
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational TrustVani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational Trust
Vani Magazine - Quarterly Magazine of Seshadripuram Educational Trust
 
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ Project
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ ProjectSocial Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ Project
Social Media Algorithms - Part of the "Computers in out Life" Erasmus+ Project
 
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlEBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
 
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024
Chacon-Immigration presentation MArch 2024
 
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria Alvarez
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria AlvarezPersonal Brand Exploration- Valeria Alvarez
Personal Brand Exploration- Valeria Alvarez
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 10 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS GIẢI CHI TIẾT (TRANG AN...
 
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)
Divisibility of numbers (Number Systems)
 
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the Brain
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the BrainLANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the Brain
LANGUAGE AND BRAIN :Relationship Between Language and the Brain
 
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer set
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer setClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer set
ClueX 2024 - Inter School Quiz question and Answer set
 
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptx
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptxProtein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptx
Protein Structure - threading Protein modelling pptx
 
Empowering Student Engagement with Open Education
Empowering Student Engagement with Open EducationEmpowering Student Engagement with Open Education
Empowering Student Engagement with Open Education
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
 
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptx
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptxlanguage diversity of the world and india ppt.pptx
language diversity of the world and india ppt.pptx
 
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.
Chemistry and formulation of para phenylenediamine based hair dye.
 
3.28.24 The Poor People's Campaign.pptx
3.28.24  The Poor People's Campaign.pptx3.28.24  The Poor People's Campaign.pptx
3.28.24 The Poor People's Campaign.pptx
 
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdf
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdfNatural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdf
Natural Numbers, Whole Numbers, Integers.pdf
 

The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate

  • 1. Learning Outcomes: Topic: Cosmological Argument Find the meanings! Infinite regress Cosmos Ex Nihilo A posteriori Inductive You will need your text books to help you answer these first questions. Scan the QR code. MUST: define and describe the main key terminology SHOULD: explain Aquinas’ three ways and ask relevant questions COULD: Interpret quotes and analyse Aquinas’ 3 ways SO THAT: I can demonstrate knowledge and understanding (A01) Create and record a mini revision podcast on Aquinas 3 ways (informative or as an interview/ hotseat Upload this to the AS Philosophy Blog Write down 5 examples of cause and effect. Ask your partner to define a key term Aquinas’s 3 Ways Example (Diagram/ picture) Explanation Any additional information Hume’s response MOTION OR CHANGE CAUSE CONTINGENCY Use the textbook to produce an A3 table (as above) with some depth! “A may be explained by B, and B by C, but in the end there will be some one object on whom all other objects depend.” Swinburne 1996 What did he mean by this? What might an atheist say in response? What do you think? Watch www.youtube.com/watch ?v=w4AHFBft2L8 What is William Lane Craig suggesting and how does it link to the Cosmological argument? Go on our blog and write a comment in response to, ‘it is acceptable to have infinite regression” It should demonstrate what you have learnt so far.
  • 2. The Cosmological Argument MUST: define and describe the main key terminology SHOULD: explain Aquinas’ three ways and ask relevant questions COULD: Interpret quotes and analyse Aquinas’ 3 ways
  • 3. Starter: Mind map what you can remember about the Prime Mover, particularly with regard to its relationship with the World
  • 4. The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument is the umbrella term given to 3 separate arguments by Aquinas- the first three of his five ways to prove God’s existence. REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU ARE WRITING AN ESSAY ON IT!
  • 5. Your Task Today, in pairs you are going to be completing a learning mat. You will all be given a sheet of paper and your task is to complete the activities on the sheet of paper to develop your knowledge.
  • 7. The Principle of Sufficient Reason In order to understand the debate between Russell and Coplestone you need to be aware of Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason. He stated: ‘in virtue of which we hold that no fact could ever be true of or existent, nor statement correct, unless there were a sufficient reason why it was thus and not otherwise.’ What do you think Leibniz means here?
  • 8. The Principle of Sufficient Reason ‘in virtue of which we hold that no fact could ever be true of or existent, nor statement correct, unless there were a sufficient reason why it was thus and not otherwise.’ Simply put: ‘no fact could ever be true…unless there were a sufficient reason why it was…’ Leibniz means that you should be able to give an explanation of why something is in order to have a sufficient explanation.
  • 9. What is the sufficient reason for… A kitten…
  • 10. What is the sufficient reason for… Fire…
  • 11. What is the sufficient reason for… The Universe… Ext: what are the problems with trying to give a sufficient reason? How do we know when we have achieved a sufficient reason?
  • 12. What is the sufficient reason for the universe …that no fact could ever be true unless there were a sufficient reason why it was… It is not enough to know how the universe came to exist…we must know why it exists… This will give us a sufficient reason.
  • 14. THE ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY Copleston: Well, for clarity's sake, I'll divide the argument into distinct stages. First of all, I should say, we know that there are at least some beings in the world which do not contain in themselves the reason for their existence. For example, I depend on my parents, and now on the air, and on food, and so on. Now, secondly, the world is simply the real or imagined totality or aggregate of individual objects, none of which contain in themselves alone the reason for their existence. There isn't any world distinct from the objects which form it, any more than the human race is something apart from the members. Therefore, I should say, since objects or events exist, and since no object of experience contains within itself reason of its existence, this reason, the totality of objects, must have a reason external to itself. That reason must be an existent being. Well, this being is either itself the reason for its own existence, or it is not. If it is, well and good. If it is not, then we must proceed farther. But if we proceed to infinity in that sense, then there's no explanation of existence at all. So, I should say, in order to explain existence, we must come to a being which contains within itself the reason for its own existence, that is to say, which cannot not exist. 1. According to Copleston, what is the only ‘sufficient reason’ for the universe? 2. In what way(s) is this similar to Aquinas’ argument from contingency?
  • 15. THE ARGUMENT FROM CONTINGENCY Copleston: P1: we know that there are at least some beings in the world which do not contain in themselves the reason for their existence. P2: the world is simply the real or imagined totality or aggregate of individual objects, none of which contain in themselves alone the reason for their existence. P3: since objects or events exist, and since no object of experience contains within itself reason of its existence, this reason, the totality of objects, must have a reason external to itself. C1: That reason must be an existent being. C2: Well, this being is either itself the reason for its own existence, or it is not. If it is, well and good. If it is not, then we must proceed farther. But if we proceed to infinity in that sense, then there's no explanation of existence at all. So, I should say, in order to explain existence, we must come to a being which contains within itself the reason for its own existence, that is to say, which cannot not exist.
  • 16. Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason • Aquinas and Copleston agree that the key to the success of the argument from contingency relies on the acceptance of God being the only sufficient reason for the existence of the universe. • Both Copleston and Aquinas argue that the universe can only be sufficiently explained by reference to God.
  • 17. Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason • For Aquinas and Copleston, God (as a necessary being) is the only sufficient reason for the universe. • This is because without a necessary being there would only ever be contingent beings…and of course it is not logical to suggest that contingent beings can cause themselves. • Thus without God there would be no universe. What do you think Aquinas and Copleston mean by a ‘necessary being’. How does a necessary being provide us with a ‘sufficient reason’?
  • 18. Step 1: the Principle of Sufficient Reason • The necessary being, God, according to the Cosmological Argument provides us with a sufficient reason as to why there is something rather than nothing.
  • 19. Step 2: What is a Sufficient Reason? • Russell questions ‘what do you mean by sufficient reason? You don’t mean cause?’. • He is challenging Copleston’s position by questioning why God must be the sufficient cause. • He asks ‘when is an explanation adequate?’ and uses the example of making a flame with a match. • What Russell is proposing is that there is no need to look to the argument from contingency (GOD) when trying to fulfil Leibniz’s principle and when trying to provide an explanation of the universe.
  • 20. Step 2: What is a Sufficient Reason? • In response to Russell, Copleston states ‘an adequate explanation must ultimately be a total explanation, to which nothing further can be added’. Q. How does God fulfil this definition of a sufficient reason? Q. Can you think of any alternative reasons for the universe that we could identify as ‘sufficient’?
  • 21. Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason? • Russell responds by saying that ‘you’re looking for something which can’t be got, and which one ought not to expect to get’. Q. What do you think Russell means here? Q. Why might he say this?
  • 22. Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason? • Russell is suggesting that it is not possible to reach a ‘sufficient reason’ for the universe. • He basis this on his empirical/agnostic stance. He maintains that as the reason is beyond human experience we can never gain a sufficient reason for the existence of the universe. • ‘I should say that the universe is just there and that is all’. 1. What are your thoughts on this perspective? 2. Is Russell justified in saying that we cannot gain knowledge of that which is beyond our understanding? 3. Does this mean that it is meaningless to talk of metaphysics or even God?
  • 23. Step 3: Is it even possible to reach a sufficient reason? • Copleston’s response is… – To defend the argument from contingency (as previously explored) – To call Russell dogmatic- strict/non-flexable He states ‘if one does not wish to embark on the path which leads to the affirmation of a transcendent being, however the latter may be described, one has to deny the reality of the problem and assert that things ‘just are’ and that the existential problem in question is just a pseudo-problem. And if one refuses to even sit down at the chess board and make a move, one cannot, of course, be checkmated.’
  • 24. Homework: Reviewing Learning 1. List two facts about a) Russell and b) Copleston. 1. What is Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason? 2. What is a necessary being? 3. Explain one reason why Copleston believes that God is the only possible sufficient reason for the universe. 4. Explain one reason why Russell believes that the universe itself (it ‘just is’) is a sufficient reason. 5. Complete the comic strip

Editor's Notes

  1. What 'I' did Aquinas believe to be impossible?*infinite regress What 'M' is Aquinas' first way?*Motion What 'A' heavily influenced Aquinas' ideas?*Aristotle What D is an analogy often used to highlight Aquinas' First 2 ways?*Domino effect What F is a phrase denying that the universe needs a cause just because everything else does?*Fallacy of Composition
  2. Car example: the reason why the car exists is because….it was built etc.
  3. Ext: what are the problems with trying to give a sufficient reason? How do we know when we have achieved a sufficient reason?
  4. When presenting the match example (use a match): ask students at what stage they think we have provided a sufficient explanation for the flame. Then apply to the argument from contingency. E.g. does a reference to infinity provide us with a full or sufficient explanation?
  5. Discuss answers: encourage G&T to explore 3. in more detail. Link to religious language.