• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Catastrophe en
 

Catastrophe en

on

  • 1,830 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,830
Views on SlideShare
1,827
Embed Views
3

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0

1 Embed 3

http://www.slideshare.net 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Catastrophe en Catastrophe en Presentation Transcript

    • Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ? Francisco Gil-White, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic and Social Editor HISTORICAL and INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH [email_address] www.hirhome.com
    • Warning
      • Whenever you see a blue triangle in the lower right of the screen…
      • … this means you must move the presentation forward by clicking the left mouse button or else the right cursor.
      • Well done.
      If you don’t see the blue triangle… … then the presentation advances by itself… … and you must wait for the animation to end… … and for the blue triangle to appear again
    • In order to understand the present, we must have the proper context.
      • In other words, we must know something about the past .
    • History of attacks against the Jewish people The Jews are massacred in Alexandria The crusaders massacre communities in the Rhineland. The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (First Jewish War) The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (Second Jewish War) (Saint) Ambrose issues a call to burn all the synagogues; many are. 1 st c. 2 nd c. 3 rd c. 5 th c. 11 th c.
    • History of attacks against the Jewish people Great pogroms (pillage and murder) against the Jews in Eastern Europe. NEVER AGAIN? The Russian Czars begin a process of slow genocide against their Jewish subjects. Great pogroms against the Jews in Eastern Europe, and then the horrific Nazi genocide. Crusaders (once again) massacre Jewish communities in the Rhineland. Forced conversions of Jews all over Europe The Jews are blamed for the plague (‘Black Death’). Some 300 European Jewish communities are wiped out. Massacred in Seville; pogroms all over Iberia. The Spanish Inquisition. Many Jews are murdered. More than 150,000 are expelled from Spain. The Inquisition becomes a pan-European phenomenon. The Inquisition continues 12 th c. 13 th c. 14 th c. 15 th c. 16 th c. 17 th c. 18 th c. 19 th c. 20 th c. 21 st c.
    • Israel: A death camp?
      • Israel is surrounded by mortal enemies.
      • To the North, Lebanon, Hezbollah, and Syria.
      • To the South, Egypt.
      • To the East, Saudi Arabia.
      • It is unlikely that Jordan will remain neutral in a conflict, and in any case it is easily overrun.
      • The Iranians are saying they wish to exterminate the Israelis, and as soon as US troops leave Iraq, they will control it completely.
      • This gives them a land corridor all the way to the northern border of Israel, because they already control Syria, Lebanon, and Hezbollah.
      http://www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/iraq-general-intro.htm
    • Israel: A death camp?
      • The enemy is also inside Israel.
      • Israelis are being told that a PLO state will bring ‘peace’ to Israel.
      • But what will a PLO state really bring?
      … peace? … or more insecurity for the Israelis?
    • A PLO state can be armed to the teeth by the Arab states (plus the rest of the Muslim world)
    • A PLO state will be the greatest disaster for the State of Israel
      • HIR has documented that the PLO was created with the explicit purpose of exterminating the Jewish people .
      • HIR has documented that the PLO is supported by the government of the United States .
      • Therefore, a PLO state in Israel (which is being achieved as we speak), is a mortal danger for the Jewish people.
    • We will now document this
      • But what we have documented will amaze and surprise you.
      • First, therefore, a few words about how we got here.
    • How did we get here?
      • In World War II, the Serbs defended the Jews like nobody else, risking and giving their lives. http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/ihralija3.htm#31b
      • Francisco Gil-White discovered the work of independent investigators who were exposing the lies against the Serbs in the recent civil wars in Yugoslavia, and began investigating this too.
      • Eventually, this work led him to study the Arab-Israeli conflict.
      • … one must first comprehend what happened in YUGOSLAVIA.
      • First, therefore, a few words about Yugoslavia.
      In order to understand what happens in Israel…
    • What happened in Yugoslavia during the 1990s?
      • The Western media said that the Serbs were murdering Bosnian Muslims, Albanians, and Croats.
      • In reality, as HIR has documented, it was fascist forces within the Bosnian Muslim, Albanian, and Croat populations who were murdering Serbs .
      • How did the international media turn the world upside down?
    • Perhaps you remember this photograph…
    • About that photo…
      • It was taken from a video shot by ITN, a British television company.
      • ITN said , and the rest of the media repeated, that this photo showed Bosnian Muslim prisoners in a Bosnian Serb death camp .
      • Less than 20 minutes after the photo was published, president Bush Sr. changed his foreign policy, and authorized the use of force against the Serbs.
      • “ less than 20 minutes after [ITN’s] report was broadcast on American television, President Bush changed his policy towards Serbia.”
      • Source: Sunday Times, August 9, 1992, Sunday, Overseas news, 1013 words, Death-camp scoop made the world sit up , by Jonathan Miller
      This is unbelievable. Can you even get dressed in less than 20 minutes? Obviously, they were waiting already for this photograph, to use it in a political campaign that had been decided beforehand.
      • … that the skinny man in front was a Bosnian Muslim prisoner in a Bosnian Serb death camp .
      • However,
      • the man smiled for the camera;
      • 2) he didn’t have his shirt on because he didn’t want to: he is holding it in his hand (it was summer).
      • 3) The fence supposedly keeping him prisoner is a chicken-wire fence that a child would have destroyed with a kick.
      • 4) He is the only one in the photograph who looks too skinny.
      NATO and the media said… Compare it to the great fence at Dachau, which was not only formidable but electrified.
    • The media lied
      • The supposed ‘death camp’ was in fact a refugee camp for displaced Bosnian Muslims.
      • It was a refugee camp, not a death camp.
        • The Serbs were helping their Bosnian Muslim neighbors who wanted to live in peace and who were fleeing Alija Izetbegovic, anti-Serb Muslim terrorist.
      • How do we know this?
      • Because the same day that ITN shot the video from which the famous photo on the TIME cover was taken, a Serbian television team was also present, and it filmed the British team shooting its video.
      • Jared Israel and Petar Makara, Emperor’s Clothes’ editors, have reproduced the Serbian footage in their documentary film JUDGMENT!
      JUDGMENT! shows what the ITN ‘journalists’ did. To get a copy of JUDGMENT!, visit: http://emperors-clothes.com/judgment.htm
    • What does JUDGMENT! show?
      • The skinny man in front had a deformity, and his friends made fun of him. That’s why he smiles (he’s embarrassed).
      • Everybody else looks well fed.
      • Penny Marshall, the ITN reporter, tried several times to get the men to say that they were mistreated prisoners, but they replied each time that they were being treated very well, that this was a refugee camp.
    • What does JUDGMENT! show?
      • There were no soldiers.
      • People came in and out of the building as they pleased.
      • They were receiving medical attention, food, etc., under difficult conditions.
      • There were no fences.
    • And the chicken-wire fence?
      • Only about 5 meters remained of a chicken-wire fence that had once protected a tiny tool shed.
      • Penny Marshall went out of her way to position her TV equipment behind this surviving bit of fence— the rest was broken and fallen down.
      • Marshall then proceeded to interview the refugees across this remaining bit of fence!
      • When she discovered the skinny man in the back, she asked that he come forward so that she could get a close up of him
    • And the chicken-wire fence? In this way, Penny Marshall attempted to create the impression of a death camp. To read more about the lies that were said to accuse the Bosnian Serbs: http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/ihralija1.htm
    • But…
      • If the photo is obviously not a photo of a death camp….
      • Why did people believe that it was?
      • Because ALL OF THE WESTERN MEDIA said that it was a death camp.
      • (the power of suggestion, when you assume that the media is honest, is quite powerful…)
      • And because the ITN video was never shown (only the photo).
      To learn more about how the media works and why it lies to you in this way: http://hirhome.com/national-security.htm
    • The other accusations against the Serbs followed the same pattern
      • The media said that Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic had incited the Serbs to commit genocide against their neighbors, causing the civil war.
      • But the speech in which he supposedly did that is an ode to brotherhood and tolerance. http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/milospeech.htm
      • They said that the Serbian security services had massacred Albanian civilians in the town of Racak, in Kosovo.
        • This was NATO’s excuse to begin bombing the Serbs.
      • But the accusation was an elaborate hoax.
      • http:// www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.htm
      • And NATO’s own forensic scientists were unable to find even one Albanian civilian massacred by the Serbs in Kosovo (you read correctly).
      • http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/freezer1.htm
    • The one who lied about Racak
      • Helena Ranta , finish forensic.
      • Sent by NATO to “investigate” the accusation of a massacre in Racak.
      • Her investigation demonstrates that there was no massacre .
      • But her report was kept secret for two years!
        • Meanwhile, Ranta said “Massacre!” to the press.
        • NATO used her statements as an excuse to begin bombing Serbia. http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.htm
    • The link between Serbia and Israel
      • The Serbs were falsely accused of committing a massacre in Racak .
      • The Israelis were falsely accused of committing a massacre in Jenin (West Bank).
      • Each time, the accusers wanted to send Helena Ranta.
    • Jenin
      • In April 2002 all the international media, with one voice, accused the Israeli Defense Forces of having committed a massacre of Arab civilians in the West Bank town of Jenin.
      • Now the accusers have confessed that there was no massacre, but this was obvious from the start.
      • The UN refugee camp, in Jenin, had a bombs-making factory, and weapons-making factory, and it was from Jenin that the great majority of suicide bombers were being sent.
        • The Israelis tried to put an end to this and a firefight resulted between the PLO terrorists and the Israeli soldiers, with casualties on both sides. http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/ranta.htm
      • The UN wanted the accusation of ‘massacre’ in Jenin ‘investigated’ by Helena Ranta …
    • When we noticed this, the light bulb finally turned on…
      • Up until this moment, we had not investigated the Arab-Israeli conflict.
      • Now we had a good reason to think that perhaps the same strategy that was being used against the Serbs was being used against the Israelis.
      • This hypothesis has been confirmed over and over again.
    • The consequence?
      • Prof. Francisco Gil-White, because he documented:
        • the truth about the civil wars in Yugoslavia; and
        • the truth about the Arab-Israeli conflict,
        • was fired from the University of Pennsylvania.
    • The slides that follow document the danger to Israel If you would like to see the evidence that Prof. Gil-White was fired for defending Israel, visit: http://hirhome.com/bio.htm Meanwhile…
    • What will be the consequence of a PLO state in the West Bank and Gaza…? Answering this question requires us first to understand the goals of the PLO.
    • What does the PLO really want?
      • If the PLO wants a state in the West Bank and Gaza, then peace is possible.
      • But if what the PLO wants is the destruction of Israel , then a PLO state is the prelude to a disastrous war.
      • Let us examine, then, what the PLO says that its goals are.
      • Article 9. . .says that “armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.”
      • Article 15 says it is “a national duty to repulse the Zionist imperialist invasion from the great Arab homeland and to purge the Zionist presence from Palestine.”
      • Article 22 declares that “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist and imperialist presence and bring about the stabilization of peace in the Middle East.”
      • Translation: The Associated Press, December 15, 1998, Tuesday, AM cycle, International News, 1070 words, Clinton meets with Netanyahu, Arafat, appeals for progress, By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent, EREZ CROSSING, Gaza Strip
      The PLO Covenant (1968) In other words, the PLO considers that the only way to “liberate Palestine” is to kill Jews. In the context of an obligatory “armed struggle,” the synonyms of “purge” are the following: rid, eliminate, remove, eradicate, do away with, clear. When the Nazis spoke of “liquidating” the Jews, what they meant was EXTERMINATION. Given that the only way to “liberate Palestine,” according to the PLO, is killing Jews… … when the PLO says that “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist presence,” it is referring to the extermination of the Jewish people. NOTE: The 1968 constitution is current . A lot of people think that the articles we quote at left have been revoked. They have not been. (But even if they had been, there would be no reason to take that seriously).
    • The PLO is…
      • The most important faction within the PLO, and the one that calls all the shots, is Al Fatah .
      • Around 1970, Al Fatah swallowed the PLO , keeping the name.
      “ By [1970]…the PLO had experienced less a revival than a total reincarnation of membership and purpose under the leadership of Yasser Arafat . Consisting ostensibly of representatives of all guerilla organizations, the PLO in its resurrected form was almost entirely Fatah-dominated , and Arafat himself served as president of its executive.” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) … Al Fatah
    • The Fatah Covenant
      • Al Fatah speaks plainly in its own Covenant. Article 12 demands
        • “ [The] complete liberation of Palestine and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.”
      • And how will Al Fatah eradicate the “Zionist economic, political, military, and cultural existence”?
        • Expelling or killing those who practice that culture .
      http://www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east/the-fatah-constitution.php
    • The Fatah Covenant
      • Al Fatah’s Covenant says, in article 19, that:
      • “ Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic and the Palestinian Arab people's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.”
      • What follows?
      • That Al Fatah, and the PLO it controls, do not want to negotiate peace.
      • PLO/ Fatah will never be satisfied with a “Palestinian” state next door to a Jewish state that is still standing.
    • The PLO and Al Fatah mean what they say
      • We will now demonstrate this
    • Where does the name “Palestine” come from?
      • The Romans renamed Judah (land of the Jews), as Judea (land of the Jews), when they conquered it.
      • Then, when Emperor Hadrian completed a long extermination of the Mediterranean Jews, he renamed it “Syria-Palestina” and forbade Jews to enter it. The point was to wipe out any connection between this area and the Jewish people, after having wiped out the Jews.
      • Palestine means: “Land of the Philistines.” But the Philistines had long ceased to exist, and the land that the Philistines had once occupied, anyway, was much smaller (more or less the Gaza Strip).
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov2.htm
      • It was the Turkish Ottoman Empire that governed the Middle East for centuries before 1918.
      • In all that time the Ottomans never bothered to specify the boundaries of any “Palestine.”
      • The 1968 PLO Covenant (the current one) says:
      • Article 1: “Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people.”
      • Article 2: “Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit”
      How does the PLO define “Palestine”? 1) How can there be a “Palestinian Arab people” whose supposedly ancestral “homeland” was defined by the British colonialists ? 2) Why does the PLO say that “Palestine” is “indivisible” when this land was divided, first, by the British, and then… by the PLO ? THERE ARE TWO CONTRADICTIONS HERE http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/plocov.htm
    • The division of “Palestine”
      • Before 1921, the British defined as “Palestine” all of the British Mandate territory.
      • In other words, before 1921, what the map at right calls “Palestine,” and also what it calls “Transjordan,” together , were “Palestine.”
      • So, in 1921 , Great Britain divided Palestine in two , and from then onwards “Palestine” was less than half its previous size.
      If the PLO means it that “Palestine” is “indivisible,” then it ought to be protesting this division . s
      • If the PLO means it that “Palestine” is “indivisible,” then…
      • … it ought to be demanding Transjordan (today, the Kingdom of Jordan).
      • But it doesn’t …
      • WHY NOT?
      ? ? ? ?
      • When Great Britain reduced “ Palestine ” to less than half its size, this was in order to forbid Jewish settlement in the territory that henceforth received the name of “Transjordan.”
      ? ? ? The Balfour Declaration said that the Jews had a right to settle in the territory called “Palestine.” In 1921, the British reduced the borders of “Palestine.”
    • ? ? ? ? Is this why the PLO does not demand Transjordan (now Jordan)? Because there aren’t any Jews there for them to kill? This hypothesis is supported by the text of the PLO constitutions. We will now demonstrate this.
    • The PLO also divided “Palestine”
      • As we saw, in the 1968 PLO Covenant (the current one), the PLO states that “Palestine” has the borders established by the British in 1921.
      • This territory includes the West Bank and Gaza.
      • But in the original , 1964 PLO Covenant, the PLO does not demand the West Bank and Gaza !
      West Bank Gaza Strip
    • The PLO also divided “Palestine”
      • In the original PLO Covenant of 1964 , the PLO stated, with great clarity, that the West Bank and Gaza were not part of “Palestine.”
        • Article 24: “This Organization does not exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or in the Himmah Area.”
      Why did the PLO modify its charter in 1968 in order to include in “Palestine,” for the first time, the West Bank and Gaza? What happened between 1964 and 1968?
      • What happened between 1964 and 1968 was the Six Day War ( 1967 ).
      • This war was provoked by the Arab states neighboring Israel, which, as they had done in the past, tried to exterminate the Israeli Jews .
      • http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1967
      • But the Arab states lost and Israel ended up in control of West Bank and Gaza.
        • (Before 1967, these territories were occupied—illegally—by Jordan and Egypt)
      • After 1967, Jews began settling in the West Bank and Gaza.
      http://www.un.int/palestine/PLO/PNA2.html West Bank Gaza Strip
    • “Palestine” doesn’t exist
      • After 1967, when Israel ended up in control of the West Bank and Gaza , the PLO quickly rewrote its Covenant so that “Palestine” would once again have the borders that capture the Jews.
      • Why?
      • Because, as the PLO explains in article 9 of its 1968 Covenant (the current one) “armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.”
      • And as it explains in article 22, “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist…presence.”
      • “ Palestine” is a territory created by the British colonialists after the First World War ended in 1918.
      • In order to reduce the area where the Jews could settle, The British redefined “Palestine” in 1921, reducing it to less than half its previous size.
      • The State of Israel, between 1948 and 1967, was even smaller, and did not include the West Bank and Gaza .
      • So before 1967, the PLO defined “Palestine” as having the borders Israel then had (without the West Bank and Gaza)
      In other words, for the PLO the words “to liberate Palestine” are synonymous with “to kill Jews.” Therefore, the borders of this supposed “Palestine” must correspond to the land on which Jews live in the Middle East.
    • But. . .
      • If the PLO’s only purpose is to kill Jews, then the famous Oslo ‘Peace’ Process must really be a Trojan Horse.
      • In other words, by means of the Oslo ‘Peace’ Process Israeli Jews have been made to think that peace can be achieved with the PLO.
        • The truth, however, is that Oslo has been a strategy to give the PLO a base inside Israel,
        • improving in this way its opportunities for killing Jews
        • and allowing the PLO to prepare the platform for the destruction of Israel .
      This interpretation of the Oslo ‘Peace’ Process is the one that PLO leaders defend when they speak to their constituency in Arabic. We demonstrate this next.
    • Said by Yasser Arafat…
      • “ A tape-recording has surfaced of PLO leader Yasser Arafat speaking to Moslem followers… Mr. Arafat was exhorting his followers to prosecute a ‘jihad ... to liberate Jerusalem’. Mr. Arafat does not deny the tape’s authenticity… [His followers] would have taken it to mean that the peace process was just a stratagem: a Trojan Horse which should now be exploited with maximum violence .”
      • Source: Evening Standard (London) May 19, 1994 ; SECTION: Pg. 9; LENGTH: 907 words; HEADLINE: A NEW KIND OF JIHAD
      “ In 1980, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia gave a clear definition: ‘What is meant by jihad is a united, comprehensive, integrated Arab-Islamic confrontation in which we place all our resources and our spiritual, cultural, political, material and military potential in a long and untiring ‘Holy War’ against Israel, of course, who else?’” Source: Evening Standard (London) May 19, 1994 ; SECTION: Pg. 9; LENGTH: 907 words; HEADLINE: A NEW KIND OF JIHAD Arafat said this in May 1994, just as the Oslo ‘Peace’ Process was being jump-started.
    • Yasser Arafat’s ‘Plan of Phases’
      • “ Shortly after signing the Declaration of Principles and the famous handshake between [PLO leader Yasser] Arafat and [Israeli prime minister] Yitzhak Rabin on the White House lawn, Arafat was declaring to his Palestinian constituency over Jordanian television that Oslo was to be understood in terms of the [PLO’s] Palestine National Council’s 1974 decision. This was a reference to the so-called Plan of Phases , according to which the Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] would acquire whatever territory it could by negotiations, then use that land as a base for pursuing its ultimate goal of Israel’s annihilation .”
      SOURCE: Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome: Delusions of a people under siege . Hanover, NH: Smith and Kraus. (p.ix)
    • Said by Faisal Husseini in 2001
      • “… Faisal Husseini, the top PLO official in Jerusalem … [was] quoted as likening the Oslo accords to a ‘Trojan horse .’ …the weekly Al-Arabi quotes Husseini as calling the Oslo accords ‘just a temporary procedure, or just a step towards something bigger…the liberation of all historical Palestine from the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) sea, even if this means that the conflict will last for another thousand years or for many generations .’”
      Source: The Baltimore Sun, July 11, 2001 Wednesday, FINAL EDITION, Pg. 1A, 1574 words, Israelis taking darker view of Palestinian intentions; Many see existence of Jewish state at risk, Mark Matthews.
    • The new PLO boss, Mahmoud Abbas
      • He is also known as ‘Abu Mazen’
      • He has always been quite important.
      • He is one of the authors of the Trojan Horse strategy.
      • His doctoral thesis explains how to destroy the Israelis by making them think that the PLO wants to negotiate peace.
      • This strategy culminated in the famous Oslo ‘Peace’ Process , which was signed by Mahmoud Abbas, not by Yasser Arafat.
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#2005
    • But, Why does the PLO want to destroy Israel?
      • Because Al Fatah , the most important and largest group within the PLO, was created by a leader of Adolf Hitler’s Final Solution for the purpose of finishing the extermination of the Jewish people.
    • Hajj Amin al Husseini
      • “ The Führer then made the following statement to the Mufti [Hajj Amin], enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart”
      • … [in the Middle East,] Germany’s objective would…be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere …”
      • Source: Germany. Auswärtiges Amt [Foreign Ministry]. Title: Documents on German foreign policy, 1918-1945, from the archives of the German Foreign Ministry. Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik. English Publisher: Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949- Description: Book v. fold. maps. 24 cm.; Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515. NOTE
      • Before this meeting, Hajj Amin had a great deal of experience with anti-Jewish terrorism.
      • The British colonialists had made him Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1920, after he organized a terrorist riot against innocent Jews.
      • He organized other terrorist waves in British Mandate “Palestine” (with the approval and cooperation of the British), in 1921, 1929, and 1936-39.
      • When he and Hitler met they had lots to talk about…
      In 1941 Hajj Amin al Husseini met with Adolf Hitler http://www.hirhome.com/israel/muftihitler.htm http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm
    • Hajj Amin al Husseini
      • In the photograph you can see Hajj Amin making revision of his Nazi troops, created out of tens of thousands of Bosnian Muslim volunteers whom he recruited himself, and who committed genocide all over Yugoslavia against Serbs, Jews, and Roma (Gypsies).
      • Hajj Amin also played an important role in getting 800,000 Hungarian Jews to the Auschwitz death camp, where they were practically all murdered.
      After his meeting with Hitler, Hajj Amin became an architect of the Final Solution. In other words, of the genocide against the European Jews.
    • Hajj Amin al Husseini
      • The caption above the photo reads:
      • “ A Muslim volunteer hangs a portrait of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem [Hajj Amin al Husseini]”
      http://emperors-clothes.com/bosnia/svijet.htm After his meeting with Hitler, Hajj Amin became an architect of the Final Solution. In other words, of the genocide against the European Jews. Above the photo the caption reads: “ Officers of the [Handzar] Division introduce themselves to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.” The SS Handzar Division murdered innocent Serbs, Jews, and Roma (Gypsies) in their homes, or else sent them to the Jasenovac death camp in the “Independent State of Croatia,” a puppet state of the Nazis in which great atrocities were committed.
    • Hajj Amin inspecting his SS Handzar Division troops
      • Source: The Marshall Cavendish Illustrated Encyclopedia of World War II, Vol. 10, page 2812.
      • The caption under the photograph reads:
      • “ One of the more bizarre aspects of the SS: the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem visiting Muslim SS troops.”
      Notice the Nazi salute…
    • As important, or more important, than Eichmann…
      • According to Dieter Wisliceny, one of Adolf Eichmann’s chief lieutenants in the Final Solution:
      • “ The Mufti [Hajj Amin] is a sworn enemy of the Jews and has always fought for the idea of annihilating the Jews. He sticks to this idea always, also in his talks with [Adolf] Eichmann ... The Mufti is one of the originators of the systematic destruction of European Jewry by the Germans, and he has become a permanent colleague, partner and adviser to Eichmann...in the implementation of this programme .”
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm Hajj Amin al Husseini
    • The father of the PLO was… “… in February 1967 the PLO leader [Ahmed Shukeiry] was wounded in an assassination attempt. For the while, as a result, the organization was at least partially immobilized by factional intrigues. Not so a rival, and even more radical Palestinian group in Syria, the Fatah (Arab Liberation Movement), organized several years earlier by veterans of the Mufti’s [Hajj Amin’s] former Arab Higher Committee .” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) “ By [1970]… the PLO in its resurrected form was almost entirely Fatah-dominated , and Arafat himself served as president of its executive…” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) YASSER ARAFAT: “… Were they able to replace our hero Hajj Amin al-Husseini ? ... There were a number of attempts to get rid of Hajj Amin, whom they considered an ally of the Nazis. But even so, he lived in Cairo, and participated in the 1948 war, and I was one of his troops .” Said by Yasser Arafat to the London-based pro-PLO puiblication Al Sharq al Awsat, and republished in the Palestinian daily Al Quds, 2 Agosto, 2002. Translated from Arabic by Palestinian Media Watch http://www.pmw.org.il/bulletins-050802.html As we’ve seen, before the World War began, the Mufti Hajj Amin was organizing anti-Jewish terrorist waves in British Mandate “Palestine.” For the last one the terrorists organized themselves as Hajj Amin’s Arab Higher Committee , with weapons furnished by Hitler. It was this same Arab Higher Committee that gave birth to Al Fatah. Soon, Al-Fatah came to own the PLO. In consequence, Al Fatah’s leader, Yasser Arafat, became the leader of the PLO. Yasser Arafat’s mentor and hero was Hajj Amin al Husseini . … Hajj Amin “ The mufti [Hajj Amin] barely escaped trial for [war crimes] by fleeing to Egypt in 1946. There he made young Yasser Arafat, then living in Cairo, his protégé. The mufti secretly imported a former Nazi commando officer into Egypt to teach Mr.. Arafat and other teenage recruits the fine points of guerrilla warfare . Mr.. Arafat learned his lessons well; the mufti was so proud of him he even pretended the two of them were blood relations.” Source: Washington Times; August 9, 2002; "Yasser Arafat: Nazi trained", by David N. Bossie.
    • The PLO is descended from the Nazis
      • For those who understand this, it is hardly a surprise that the PLO wants to exterminate the Jews .
      • The intelligence services of the United States, naturally, understand perfectly the PLO’s Nazi history, and its genocidal project.
      • Why then does the US support the PLO against Israel?
      • President Ronald Reagan was pushing for a PLO state in Israeli territory: the West Bank. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1981
      • At the same time , the PLO terrorists were attacking Israeli civilians from their bases in Lebanon.
        • “ ...the PLO shifted its bases to Lebanon and continued its attacks on Israel. The PLO's relations with the Lebanese were tumultuous, and the organization soon became embroiled in Lebanon's sectarian disputes and contributed to that country's eventual slide into civil war.”
      • http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1982
      The early 80s
    • The early 80s
      • Because the PLO was murdering Israeli civilians , Israel invaded Lebanon and launched a
        • “ campaign that Israel said would wipe out the PLO as a political and military force and open the way for true peace in the Middle East.”
      • But when the Israeli troops were getting ready to deliver the final blow to the PLO, the US intervened to save the PLO and send it to Tunis .
      • The Washington Post took note of the contrast between the PLO’s earlier exit from Jordan and this exit from Lebanon:
        • “ From Amman [Jordan], the PLO troops left unheralded, in ridicule. From Beirut [Lebanon], they left in a compromise negotiated by the United States , waving their Kalashnikov rifles. Arafat left not in the middle of the night but with an emotional dockside sendoff from the Lebanese prime minister, a French Navy escort and U.S. air cover .”
    • The early 80s
      • Before the Israeli invasion, the American diplomats in Beirut had their security provided for by… the PLO!
      • In other words, the Nazi PLO terrorists were the bodyguards of the American diplomats .
      • "The Lebanese occupation by Israel caused the Palestinians to have to leave Lebanon eventually...They had been the protectors for the American diplomatic community in Beirut...There was liaison with the PLO, and the Americans were depending on them for their security."
      • Source: Vincent Cannistraro, Director of National Security Council Intelligence from 1984 to 1987.
      • http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1982
    • The early 80s
      • Although the US saved the PLO in 1982, the PLO was defeated anyway, because from Tunis it was very difficult to kill Israelis.
      • But the US government undertook to fix this for the PLO, and went quite out of its way to revive this antisemitic terrorist organization.
    • 1991: The United States forces Israel to accept the PLO inside the Jewish state
      • President George Bush (Sr.)…
      … and his Secretary of State James Baker III… … threatened the Israelis for 8 months with the denial of all economic aid, until they forced the Israelis to participate in what became the ‘Oslo process,’ the purpose of which was to bring the PLO from exile, where it was defeated, and into the heart of the Jewish state. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1991
    • The ultimate purpose of Oslo
      • From the beginning, everybody understood that the final goal of Oslo would be the creation of a PLO state in the West Bank and Gaza.
      • This is now being achieved.
      • However, the United States knew from the beginning that giving the West Bank and Gaza to Israel’s enemies would spell the destruction of Israel.
      • We demonstrate this next.
    • The Six Day War
      • In 1967, the Arab countries neighboring Israel, as they had done in the past, provoked a war whose goal was the extermination of the Israeli Jews.
      • http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1967
      • The Arab states lost, and they lost also some territory.
      • The Pentagon – which is to say, the US military – carried out a study in the same year of 1967 in order to examine the situation of the Jewish state.
      The Pentagon study was not conducted in order to inform Israel. On the contrary, it was kept secret and was not released until the year 1984.
    • The Six Day War This study concludes that: “ From a strictly military point of view Israel would require the retention of some captured Arab territory in order to provide militarily defensible borders.” Specifically: Israel cannot survive without the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights.
    • The Pentagon study says:
      • Israel needs to retain the greater part of the West Bank because,
      • “ This border area [along the West Bank] has traditionally been lightly held by military forces and defenses consist[ing] mainly of small, widely separated outposts and patrols and, therefore, afforded an area where launching of saboteurs and terrorists into Israel was relatively easy...”
    • The Pentagon study says:
      • On the Syrian border,
      • “ Israel must hold the commanding terrain east of the boundary of 4 June 1967 which overlooks the Galilee area.”
      • This is a reference to the Golan Heights, from which the Syrians had been shelling Israeli farmers in the Galilee.
      • As the Pentagon study says: “During the period January 1965 to February 1967, a total of 28 sabotage and terrorist acts occurred along this border.”
    • The Pentagon study says:
      • Concerning Jerusalem, the Pentagon study states that:
      • “ To defend the Jerusalem area would require that the boundary of Israel be positioned to the east of the city to provide for the organization of an adequate defensive position.”
    • The Pentagon study says:
      • And about the Gaza strip, the Pentagon study states that,
      • “ The Strip, under Egyptian control, provides a salient into Israel a little less than 30 miles long and from four to eight miles wide. It has served as a training area for the Palestine Liberation Army... Occupation of the Strip by Israel would reduce the hostile border by a factor of five and eliminate a source for raids and training of the Palestine Liberation Army.”
    • The Pentagon study says:
      • This document was declassified in 1984, and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs published it then: http://www.jinsa.org/articles/print.html?documentid=496
      • It was also published by the Journal of Palestine Studies http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pentagon.pdf
    • The Pentagon’s conclusions are not difficult to understand
      • First, find the West Bank Border.
      • Notice that the West Bank is hills, whereas the most populated zone in Israel, Tel Aviv, is a lowland to its side.
      • And Jerusalem is almost completely surrounded by the West Bank.
      • The Israelis are trapped in a lowland between the hills and the sea. And their capital city is surrounded.
      West Bank Border West Bank West Bank Tel Aviv Jerusalem
    • The Pentagon’s conclusions are not difficult to understand
      • The situation is better appreciated when you consider the distances, which are really quite small.
      • From the West Bank hills to the sea, in the Tel-Aviv-Yafo area, the most densely populated in Israel , there are no more than 11 miles.
      • Many people who take care of their health jog this distance every morning.
      West Bank
    • Analysis
      • Given
        • that the US government determined that Israel cannot survive without the West Bank and Gaza,
        • and that the US government forced Israel to participate in Oslo, whose objective is to wrest the West Bank and Gaza away from Israel,
        • and that this territory is being given to the PLO, an organization created by the top leader of the Nazi anti-Jewish extermination.
      Can it be possible that the US ruling elite, running the world superpower, is trying to destroy the tiny Jewish state?
    • It is possible
      • HIR has produced a book that documents US foreign policy toward the Jewish state from the 1930s until the present.
      • It is practically impossible to find a year in which the foreign policy of the United States was not anti-Jewish.
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm The book is regularly updated but the following years are already documented: 1930s, 1930-45, 1945, 1947-48, 1949-53, 1955, 1955-65, 1958, 1964, 1964-1967, 1967, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1974-75, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981, 1982-83, 1985, 1987-88, 1989, 1991, 1994, 2005.
    • But…
      • What about the economic aid that Israel receives from the United States?
      • And does Israel receive so much?
      • But, What about the weapons Israel gets from the United States?
      What Israel gets is very little if it is considered in context, against the financial aid that the enemies of Israel receive. For example, Egypt gets only slightly less than Israel from the United States, and all that money goes to buying weapons. We need also to compare this to what the enemies of Israel get. There is no country in the world that gets more military hardware from the United States than Saudi Arabia, whose king explained to us the importance of destroying Israel. Let us suppose that a ‘friend’ offers you a million dollars, but on condition that you allow a hired assassin, whose job is to kill you, to live in your own house. ¿Seem like a friendly offer? We have seen already that the financial aid Israel gets from the United States was on condition that Israel bring the PLO (the Nazis) inside. http://emperors-clothes.com/news/arming-i.htm
    • BUT!
      • Don't US officials say all the time that the United States supports Israel?
      • And don’t they explain to everybody that supporting Israel is precisely what defines their foreign policy?
      Of course they do say it, and it is very easy to say. And the repetition of it convinces a lot of people. But think about it: What is the effect of this? If everybody is upset with US foreign policy, then, if they are told that it is all being done for the Jews, what is being promoted is ANTISEMITISM!
    •  
    • What will be the consequence?
    • Predicting catastrophe
      • Some catastrophes are preceded by signs that announce them.
      • For example, a Hawaiian website dedicated to tsunamis warns:
        • “ If you are at the beach and you…observe a rapid withdrawal of the sea…head for higher ground immediately.” http://www.tsunami.org/faq.htm
      • Why this warning?
        • Because when the sea retreats to the horizon, what is coming is a massive, destructive wave.
      • Therefore, if a person stays at the beach after noticing that the sea suddenly retreats, this person doesn’t know a thing about tsunamis .
    • Predicting catastrophe
      • If this person should nevertheless somehow survive the tsunami, we logically would expect this person to have learned something.
      • The next time the ocean retreated to the horizon, therefore, this person would not stay at the beach.
      • Otherwise we would have to suppose that this person is insane , or else wishes to commit suicide .
    • The recent Jewish Catastrophe
      • During World War II, the Jewish people suffered a great Catastrophe.
      • It was preceded by dramatic signs.
      • The most important of these was a hysteria all over Europe and the United States.
      • People were made to believe that “the Jews” in secret controlled the Western governments and were planning to use their clandestine power to destroy “Christian civilization.”
      • The Holocaust would have been impossible if millions of Christians had not first been made to believe that the Jews supposedly wanted to destroy them.
      • Why?
      • Because the extermination of an entire people is something that only people who believe they are defending themselves will do.
      • Otherwise they won’t.
    • The recent Jewish Catastrophe It’s important to understand this propaganda, because it is once again very popular.
    • “ The Protocols of Zion”
      • At the turn of the 20 th century, a hoax produced by the Russian Czar’s secret police, the Okhrana, began to be eagerly distributed in the West.
      • It bore the name “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”
      • It pretended to be the minutes from a meeting of super-powerful Jews who in secret controlled all the Western governments and wished to destroy the Christians .
      Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/
    • “ The Protocols of Zion”
      • The Czarist government was trying to distract the oppressed Russian masses from their real problems, in this way hoping to convince them that everything that was wrong was the fault of “the Jews.”
      Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/
    • “ The Protocols of Zion”
      • In 1921, Phillip Graves, from The Times of London , demonstrated on the first page:
        • that that the conversations between the supposed super powerful Jews had been cut and pasted from the conversations that Joly invented between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.
      • The title of Maurice Joly’s book is “Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.”
      • It has got nothing to do with Jews.
      Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ http://emperors-clothes.com/antisem/times-pdf.htm
    • This demonstration was not necessary
      • The overwhelming majority of Jews were quite poor and lived in villages called shtetl .
    • “ The Protocols of Zion” Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/
      • But many people believed the propaganda in “The Protocols”…
      • This did not stop the Russian Revolution from happening, as the Czar was hoping, but “The Protocols” did help instigate horrific ‘pogroms’ :
        • episodes of arbitrary sacking and killing in Jewish communities all over the Russian Empire.
      • Phillip Graves’ demonstration in 1921 had zero effect on the public; the multitudes continued to believe the anti-Jewish slanders.
      • After, the Nazis (along with Henry Ford) became the main disseminators of the anti-Jewish propaganda in “The Protocols”
      http://emperors-clothes.com/antisem/protocols-1.htm
    • “ The Protocols of Zion” Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/
      • “ The Protocols” became a bestseller all over the West.
      • Westerners ended up feeling a profound fear of the Jews.
      • This fear is what allowed Adolf Hitler to carry out his genocide of the Jewish people.
    • “ The Protocols of Zion”
      • Phillip Graves’ investigation is not the only thing that showed “The Protocols” to be a hoax.
      • The Holocaust itself was a demonstration.
      • If “the Jews” had really controlled the Western governments, these governments would have intervened to save them.
      • What these governments did instead was cooperate with the Final Solution .
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1939
    •  
    • Are we back in the 1930s…?
      • In the year 2003, The European Union produced an investigation on the state of antisemitism.
      • This investigation establishes that there has been an alarming (and violent) growth in antisemitism all over Europe.
      The European Union initially suppressed the report! But others published it and eventually so did the EU. Nevertheless, it did not receive much publicity, and it is quite obvious that few Jews understand just how alarming their situation has become. http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/eurepantisem.htm
    • The absurd Nazi propaganda is back
      • There is an effort to convince people of the same absurdity:
        • that “the Jews” supposedly control everything in secret in order to hurt us.
      • But though this is absurd it hardly means that people are not believing it. In World War II millions believed it.
      • Their leaders told them it was so, and they are telling them again.
      We are not talking (only) of obscure and extreme right-wing leaders.
    • Ralph Nader, candidate for president of the United States
      • "The days when the chief Israeli puppeteer comes to the United States and meets with the puppet in the White House and then proceeds to Capitol Hill, where he meets with hundreds of other puppets, should be replaced."
      The Washington Post quotes Nader and then, for comparison, it quotes what the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi organization in the United States, says: "Bush also repeated the catch-phrase . . . 'committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish state,' which is repeated almost word-for-word again and again by Israel's sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets." Ralph Nader sounds just like the neo-nazis. But he is supposed to be… A LEFTIST! Source: Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64028-2004Aug13.html
    • Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela
      • In a televised Christmas speech (December 2005), Hugo Chávez said:
      • “ the descendants of those who crucified Christ have possessed themselves of the world’s riches and have concentrated them in a few hands.”
      Hugo Chávez is also, supposedly, a leftist. Today’s leftists sound exactly like the Nazis. http://www.noticierodigital.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=49379
    • Ex-prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohammed
      • In 2003, Mahathir ‘accused’ Jews of having
        • “ invented democracy, communism, socialism and human rights”
      • This is precisely what the German Nazis charged: “the Jews” were supposedly behind everything they disliked.
      • The only difference is that the German Nazis also accused “the Jews” of having invented capitalism!
      • Mahathir also said “the Jews” constitute a world conspiracy with the purpose of humiliating Gentiles (especially Muslims).  
        • http://www.mathaba.net/gci/news/mahathir.htm
      The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
    • Mahathir said:
      • “ Is it true that 1.3 billion people can exert no power to save themselves from the humiliation and oppression inflicted upon them by a much smaller enemy?”
      • “ Can they only lash back blindly in anger?”
      • “ Is there no other way than to ask our young people to blow themselves up and kill people and invite the massacre of more of our own people?”
      • “ It cannot be that there is no other way.”
      • “ 1.3 billion Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews.”
        • http://www.mathaba.net/gci/news/mahathir.htm
      The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
    • Mahathir said:
      • “ We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. ”
      • “ The Europeans killed six million Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.”
        • http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
      Mahathir is saying that the Jews supposedly want to exterminate 1.3 billion Muslims! This is how the Nazis also talked: they said that the Jews supposedly wanted to destroy non-Jews. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
      • “ We need guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships for our defense. But because we discouraged the learning of science and mathematics, etc, as giving no merit for the akhirat [i.e., the hereafter], today we have no capacity to produce our own weapons for our defense .”
      Mahathir said: “ Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine we have not achieved any result. We have in fact worsened our situation...[We must] think. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking.”
        • http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
      Adolf Hitler also said that the Germans needed to “defend” themselves from the Jews. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
    • Mahathir said:
        • http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/eureport.htm
      Adolf Hitler also spoke of the Jews as if they were a parasite that survived every attack. “ Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine we have not achieved any result. We have in fact worsened our situation...[We must] think. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking.” The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
    • Mahathir made these statements at a summit attended by all chiefs of state in the Muslim world. When he finished, they gave him a standing ovation. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
    • What was the Western reaction?
      • The Western reaction is quite informative.
      • If Western leaders wished to counteract what Mahathir said, then:
        • They would explain to the public that what Mahathir said is the same old Nazi propaganda
        • And they would demonstrate why these are lies.
      • If, on the contrary , Western leaders want to promote antisemitism, then:
        • they will remain silent; or
        • they will criticize Mahathir weakly, timidly, and uselessly; or
        • they will make statements echoing those of Mahathir
    • Jacques Chirac, French president
      • “ A French diplomat, who asked not to be named, said while Chirac disagreed with Mahathir's strident views, he argued that an EU [European Union] summit declaration 'would not have been appropriate.’”
      • Source: Associated Press Worldstream; October 19, 2003 Sunday; Section: International News; Distribution: Asia; England; Europe; Britain; Scandinavia; Middle East; Africa; Length: 326 Words; Headline: Malaysian Leader Says France's Chirac 'Understands' His Remarks About Jews; Dateline: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
      • “ Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohammad [i.e., Mahathir] today expressed his gratitude to French President Jacques Chirac for his 'understanding' of the OIC chairman's speech at the opening of the 10th Organization of the Islamic Conference Summit here.”
      • Source: New Straits Times (Malaysia); October 19, 2003, Sunday; Section: Nation; Pg. 3; Headline: Dr M expresses gratitude to Chirac for his 'understanding'
    • George W. Bush, president of the United States
      • George Bush Jr. did not call Mahathir’s statements antisemitic.
      • He did not call them outrageous.
      • He did not call them a direct echo of the German Nazis.
      • He did not say they were an incitement to genocide.
      • Instead, George Bush called Mahathir’s statements … “divisive.”
      Divisive ! And Hitler’s identical statements? Were they also “divisive” ?
    • George W. Bush, president of the United States
      • Mahathir denied that Bush had rebuked him:
      • “‘ It's the biggest lie. If he had rebuked me I'm quite sure I would have rebuked him also,’ Mahathir was quoted as saying when he arrived home after a series of visits to neighboring countries.
      • Mahathir said it was common for someone who could lie about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war (in Iraq) to lie about what he had said, the agency reported.
      • The prime minister told reporters that from what he remembered Bush had pulled him aside at an Asia-Pacific summit in Bangkok last week only to explain why he had made such a strong statement over Mahathir's remarks about Jews.”
      • Source: Agence France Presse – English October 25, 2003 Saturday; SECTION: International News; LENGTH: 371 words; HEADLINE: Bush did not rebuke me: Mahathir; DATELINE: KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25
      In other words, according to Mahathir, Bush did not rebuke him, but on the contrary apologized for having had to make his weak and useless ‘criticism,’ which Bush called ‘strong.’ And what was Bush’s reaction to Mahathir’s accusation that Bush is a liar? According to the same Agence France Presse report, George Bush agreed with Mahathir! “I said [about Mahathir’s statements], 'they're divisive and unnecessary.' I didn't yell at him, I just told him,” the US president told reporters. Bush did not rebuke me. Nonsense! lacks the guts
    • George W. Bush, president of the United States
      • Just one month after Mahathir’s speech, Bush said this:
      • "Israel should freeze settlement construction, dismantle unauthorized outposts, end the daily humiliation of the Palestinian people , and not prejudice final negotiations with the placements of walls and fences."
      • Source: -- Text of President Bush's Speech, Associated Press Online, November 19, 2003 Wednesday, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, 3930 words
      I remind you that Mahathir had said in his speech: “ Is it true that 1.3 billion people can exert no power to save themselves from the humiliation and oppression inflicted upon them by a much smaller enemy?” If “the Jews” really controlled the Western governments, Bush would not be repeating Mahathir’s statements. He would make a very public speech, and would accuse Mahathir of reviving Nazi ideology .
    • The claims in the “The Protocols” are very popular today
      • For example, quite a few people believe that:
        • “ the Jews” control the media
        • “ the Jews” control the United States, the world superpower
      • These beliefs are absurd.
      • If “the Jews” control the United States, then
        • Why is the Jewish state ceding territory – under pressure from the United States – to Nazis who want to exterminate the Jews?
      • And if “the Jews” control the media, then
        • Why is the media eagerly promoting the lie – which already produced a genocide before – that “the Jews” supposedly control the US government?
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/mprot1.htm http://www.hirhome.com/israel/mearsheimer_walt.htm
    • But won’t Jewish leaders defend Israel?
      • They will not.
      • Diaspora Jewish leaders are not defending the State of Israel. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders2.htm
      • This repeats the performance of Diaspora Jewish leaders during the Holocaust, who did not defend the European Jews. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders1.htm
      • And Israeli leaders are not defending Israel either. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders3.htm
      • This repeats the performance of proto-Israeli leaders during the Holocaust, when they did not defend the European Jews. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders4.htm
    • Adding two and two…
    •  
    • (Please wait for the blue triangle to reappear)
      • The Jewish state is quickly ceding territory to a Nazi organization.
      • This is happening thanks to the pressure of the world superpower, which works overtime to assist the PLO.
      • The absurd claims that produced the Nazi genocide are again very popular.
      • Many leaders from the left, center, and right, are promoting these claims.
      • Some are even making a public call for the extermination of the Jewish people – for example, since October 2005, the president of Iran.
      • This same country, Iran, is trying to obtain nuclear weapons and is about to end up in control of Iraq, which practically borders Israel.
      http://www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/iraq-general-intro.htm
    • What is about to happen is a…
      • genocide
    • But it doesn’t have to happen
      • We demonstrate this next
      • 1947-48
      • In 1947, two years after the Holocaust ended, the United Nations voted in favor of creating
        • A Jewish state
        • and an Arab state
      • in the territory that had been British Mandate “Palestine.”
      1947
    • 1947
      • The government of the United States was opposed to the creation of Israel.
      • But Andrei Gromyko (the Soviet Union’s foreign minister) made a passionate speech in favor.
      • US president Harry Truman was left with no choice but to vote in favor.
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1947
    • 1948
      • The Arab countries immediately launched a war against the new state of Israel.
      • They announced that their goal was genocide.
      • The United States reacted
        • by removing its recognition of the State of Israel
        • by slapping an arms embargo on the Israeli Jews so that they would be unable to defend themselves.
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1947
    • 1948
      • Great Britain also reacted:
        • It used its armed forces, which had not yet finished evacuating “Palestine” to inconvenience the Israelis and assist the Arabs
        • And it sent captured Nazi officers to advise and lead the Arab armies.
      http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm#1947
      • 250,000 US citizens
      • coming from 14 states and 100 cities
      • protested in the City of New York
      • against the anti-Israeli policies of the United States and Great Britain
      The American people didn’t like that And they forced the US government to desist… http://www.hirhome.com/israel/apr.pdf
    • Obviously
      • We must distinguish between the ruling elite in the United States, and the American people.
      • The people is the natural ally of Israel.
      • It is imperative to inform the US citizenry, so that it will once again defend justice, and the Jewish people.
    • Our vision at F.A.C.E.S.
      • Most people are basically good.
      • Therefore, when they are properly informed, they tend to do the right thing.
      For example, US citizens defended the Jewish state in 1948 because they understood what was happening. Today very few people defend the Jewish state because they don’t understand that, once again, the Jews are being attacked by the Nazis.
    • Our mission at F.A.C.E.S.
      • The Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic and Social was created:
        • to investigate scientifically the causes of conflict; and
        • to make known to the general public the results of these investigations.
      In this way, we mean to counteract the negative influence of the mass media. Why? Because, as we have seen, the mass media does not inform , it disinforms, and the effect is to promote more conflict and injustice.
    • Our immediate objective : to prevent a genocide
      • Informing the public about how the mass media really works.
      • Correcting the lies said about Israel.
      • Informing the public about the origins of the PLO.
      • Informing the public about the pro-PLO policies of the US government.
      The ideology of most US citizens is in general quite good. They believe in democracy, human rights, tolerance … When they hear the truth, they will oppose their own government, and they will defend Israel, as they did in 1948.
    • The plan
      • To create a media infrastructure to inform the US (and world) public – fast.
      • F.A.C.E.S. will finance the creation of strategies that will bring many more people to our web pages so that they may document themselves.
      • It is important to reach the university students: energetic and idealistic.
      • It is important to reach a broader and more diverse audience.
      • We must take advantage of the mass educational potential of film.
      The skeleton already exists. HIR already informs a growing number of people. But much more is needed. F.A.C.E.S. will hire more investigators, whose work will refute a greater number of media lies than is at present possible. F.A.C.E.S. will hire translators so that those who cannot read English may also inform themselves. TV advertisements. Newspaper advertisements. T-shirts with ads. Etc. F.A.C.E.S. will finance and organize conferences to educate the university and other publics directly, in the United States and in Israel. This is a public that is eager to do the right thing, but very poorly informed . F.A.C.E.S. will finance the production of documentaries, because in this way we can reach great numbers of people quickly and effectively.
    • What our strategy requires
      • Financing.
      • If you would like to help, please contact us: [email_address]