Will there soon be an anti-Jewish genocide in Israel ? Francisco Gil-White, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic and Social Editor HISTORICAL and INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH [email_address] www.hirhome.com
Whenever you see a blue triangle in the lower right of the screen…
… this means you must move the presentation forward by clicking the left mouse button or else the right cursor.
If you don’t see the blue triangle… … then the presentation advances by itself… … and you must wait for the animation to end… … and for the blue triangle to appear again
In order to understand the present, we must have the proper context.
In other words, we must know something about the past .
History of attacks against the Jewish people The Jews are massacred in Alexandria The crusaders massacre communities in the Rhineland. The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (First Jewish War) The Romans exterminate the Jewish people (Second Jewish War) (Saint) Ambrose issues a call to burn all the synagogues; many are. 1 st c. 2 nd c. 3 rd c. 5 th c. 11 th c.
History of attacks against the Jewish people Great pogroms (pillage and murder) against the Jews in Eastern Europe. NEVER AGAIN? The Russian Czars begin a process of slow genocide against their Jewish subjects. Great pogroms against the Jews in Eastern Europe, and then the horrific Nazi genocide. Crusaders (once again) massacre Jewish communities in the Rhineland. Forced conversions of Jews all over Europe The Jews are blamed for the plague (‘Black Death’). Some 300 European Jewish communities are wiped out. Massacred in Seville; pogroms all over Iberia. The Spanish Inquisition. Many Jews are murdered. More than 150,000 are expelled from Spain. The Inquisition becomes a pan-European phenomenon. The Inquisition continues 12 th c. 13 th c. 14 th c. 15 th c. 16 th c. 17 th c. 18 th c. 19 th c. 20 th c. 21 st c.
The skinny man in front had a deformity, and his friends made fun of him. That’s why he smiles (he’s embarrassed).
Everybody else looks well fed.
Penny Marshall, the ITN reporter, tried several times to get the men to say that they were mistreated prisoners, but they replied each time that they were being treated very well, that this was a refugee camp.
Only about 5 meters remained of a chicken-wire fence that had once protected a tiny tool shed.
Penny Marshall went out of her way to position her TV equipment behind this surviving bit of fence— the rest was broken and fallen down.
Marshall then proceeded to interview the refugees across this remaining bit of fence!
When she discovered the skinny man in the back, she asked that he come forward so that she could get a close up of him
And the chicken-wire fence? In this way, Penny Marshall attempted to create the impression of a death camp. To read more about the lies that were said to accuse the Bosnian Serbs: http://www.hirhome.com/yugo/ihralija1.htm
Article 9. . .says that “armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.”
Article 15 says it is “a national duty to repulse the Zionist imperialist invasion from the great Arab homeland and to purge the Zionist presence from Palestine.”
Article 22 declares that “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist and imperialist presence and bring about the stabilization of peace in the Middle East.”
Translation: The Associated Press, December 15, 1998, Tuesday, AM cycle, International News, 1070 words, Clinton meets with Netanyahu, Arafat, appeals for progress, By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent, EREZ CROSSING, Gaza Strip
The PLO Covenant (1968) In other words, the PLO considers that the only way to “liberate Palestine” is to kill Jews. In the context of an obligatory “armed struggle,” the synonyms of “purge” are the following: rid, eliminate, remove, eradicate, do away with, clear. When the Nazis spoke of “liquidating” the Jews, what they meant was EXTERMINATION. Given that the only way to “liberate Palestine,” according to the PLO, is killing Jews… … when the PLO says that “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist presence,” it is referring to the extermination of the Jewish people. NOTE: The 1968 constitution is current . A lot of people think that the articles we quote at left have been revoked. They have not been. (But even if they had been, there would be no reason to take that seriously).
The most important faction within the PLO, and the one that calls all the shots, is Al Fatah .
Around 1970, Al Fatah swallowed the PLO , keeping the name.
“ By …the PLO had experienced less a revival than a total reincarnation of membership and purpose under the leadership of Yasser Arafat . Consisting ostensibly of representatives of all guerilla organizations, the PLO in its resurrected form was almost entirely Fatah-dominated , and Arafat himself served as president of its executive.” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) … Al Fatah
“ Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic and the Palestinian Arab people's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.”
That Al Fatah, and the PLO it controls, do not want to negotiate peace.
PLO/ Fatah will never be satisfied with a “Palestinian” state next door to a Jewish state that is still standing.
The Romans renamed Judah (land of the Jews), as Judea (land of the Jews), when they conquered it.
Then, when Emperor Hadrian completed a long extermination of the Mediterranean Jews, he renamed it “Syria-Palestina” and forbade Jews to enter it. The point was to wipe out any connection between this area and the Jewish people, after having wiped out the Jews.
Palestine means: “Land of the Philistines.” But the Philistines had long ceased to exist, and the land that the Philistines had once occupied, anyway, was much smaller (more or less the Gaza Strip).
It was the Turkish Ottoman Empire that governed the Middle East for centuries before 1918.
In all that time the Ottomans never bothered to specify the boundaries of any “Palestine.”
Article 1: “Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people.”
Article 2: “Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit”
How does the PLO define “Palestine”? 1) How can there be a “Palestinian Arab people” whose supposedly ancestral “homeland” was defined by the British colonialists ? 2) Why does the PLO say that “Palestine” is “indivisible” when this land was divided, first, by the British, and then… by the PLO ? THERE ARE TWO CONTRADICTIONS HERE http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/plocov.htm
When Great Britain reduced “ Palestine ” to less than half its size, this was in order to forbid Jewish settlement in the territory that henceforth received the name of “Transjordan.”
? ? ? The Balfour Declaration said that the Jews had a right to settle in the territory called “Palestine.” In 1921, the British reduced the borders of “Palestine.”
? ? ? ? Is this why the PLO does not demand Transjordan (now Jordan)? Because there aren’t any Jews there for them to kill? This hypothesis is supported by the text of the PLO constitutions. We will now demonstrate this.
After 1967, when Israel ended up in control of the West Bank and Gaza , the PLO quickly rewrote its Covenant so that “Palestine” would once again have the borders that capture the Jews.
Because, as the PLO explains in article 9 of its 1968 Covenant (the current one) “armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.”
And as it explains in article 22, “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist…presence.”
“ Palestine” is a territory created by the British colonialists after the First World War ended in 1918.
In order to reduce the area where the Jews could settle, The British redefined “Palestine” in 1921, reducing it to less than half its previous size.
The State of Israel, between 1948 and 1967, was even smaller, and did not include the West Bank and Gaza .
So before 1967, the PLO defined “Palestine” as having the borders Israel then had (without the West Bank and Gaza)
In other words, for the PLO the words “to liberate Palestine” are synonymous with “to kill Jews.” Therefore, the borders of this supposed “Palestine” must correspond to the land on which Jews live in the Middle East.
“ A tape-recording has surfaced of PLO leader Yasser Arafat speaking to Moslem followers… Mr. Arafat was exhorting his followers to prosecute a ‘jihad ... to liberate Jerusalem’. Mr. Arafat does not deny the tape’s authenticity… [His followers] would have taken it to mean that the peace process was just a stratagem: a Trojan Horse which should now be exploited with maximum violence .”
Source: Evening Standard (London) May 19, 1994 ; SECTION: Pg. 9; LENGTH: 907 words; HEADLINE: A NEW KIND OF JIHAD
“ In 1980, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia gave a clear definition: ‘What is meant by jihad is a united, comprehensive, integrated Arab-Islamic confrontation in which we place all our resources and our spiritual, cultural, political, material and military potential in a long and untiring ‘Holy War’ against Israel, of course, who else?’” Source: Evening Standard (London) May 19, 1994 ; SECTION: Pg. 9; LENGTH: 907 words; HEADLINE: A NEW KIND OF JIHAD Arafat said this in May 1994, just as the Oslo ‘Peace’ Process was being jump-started.
“ Shortly after signing the Declaration of Principles and the famous handshake between [PLO leader Yasser] Arafat and [Israeli prime minister] Yitzhak Rabin on the White House lawn, Arafat was declaring to his Palestinian constituency over Jordanian television that Oslo was to be understood in terms of the [PLO’s] Palestine National Council’s 1974 decision. This was a reference to the so-called Plan of Phases , according to which the Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] would acquire whatever territory it could by negotiations, then use that land as a base for pursuing its ultimate goal of Israel’s annihilation .”
SOURCE: Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome: Delusions of a people under siege . Hanover, NH: Smith and Kraus. (p.ix)
“… Faisal Husseini, the top PLO official in Jerusalem … [was] quoted as likening the Oslo accords to a ‘Trojan horse .’ …the weekly Al-Arabi quotes Husseini as calling the Oslo accords ‘just a temporary procedure, or just a step towards something bigger…the liberation of all historical Palestine from the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) sea, even if this means that the conflict will last for another thousand years or for many generations .’”
Source: The Baltimore Sun, July 11, 2001 Wednesday, FINAL EDITION, Pg. 1A, 1574 words, Israelis taking darker view of Palestinian intentions; Many see existence of Jewish state at risk, Mark Matthews.
“ The Führer then made the following statement to the Mufti [Hajj Amin], enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart”
… [in the Middle East,] Germany’s objective would…be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere …”
Source: Germany. Auswärtiges Amt [Foreign Ministry]. Title: Documents on German foreign policy, 1918-1945, from the archives of the German Foreign Ministry. Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik. English Publisher: Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949- Description: Book v. fold. maps. 24 cm.; Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515. NOTE
Before this meeting, Hajj Amin had a great deal of experience with anti-Jewish terrorism.
The British colonialists had made him Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1920, after he organized a terrorist riot against innocent Jews.
He organized other terrorist waves in British Mandate “Palestine” (with the approval and cooperation of the British), in 1921, 1929, and 1936-39.
When he and Hitler met they had lots to talk about…
In 1941 Hajj Amin al Husseini met with Adolf Hitler http://www.hirhome.com/israel/muftihitler.htm http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm
In the photograph you can see Hajj Amin making revision of his Nazi troops, created out of tens of thousands of Bosnian Muslim volunteers whom he recruited himself, and who committed genocide all over Yugoslavia against Serbs, Jews, and Roma (Gypsies).
Hajj Amin also played an important role in getting 800,000 Hungarian Jews to the Auschwitz death camp, where they were practically all murdered.
After his meeting with Hitler, Hajj Amin became an architect of the Final Solution. In other words, of the genocide against the European Jews.
“ A Muslim volunteer hangs a portrait of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem [Hajj Amin al Husseini]”
http://emperors-clothes.com/bosnia/svijet.htm After his meeting with Hitler, Hajj Amin became an architect of the Final Solution. In other words, of the genocide against the European Jews. Above the photo the caption reads: “ Officers of the [Handzar] Division introduce themselves to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.” The SS Handzar Division murdered innocent Serbs, Jews, and Roma (Gypsies) in their homes, or else sent them to the Jasenovac death camp in the “Independent State of Croatia,” a puppet state of the Nazis in which great atrocities were committed.
Hajj Amin inspecting his SS Handzar Division troops
Source: The Marshall Cavendish Illustrated Encyclopedia of World War II, Vol. 10, page 2812.
The caption under the photograph reads:
“ One of the more bizarre aspects of the SS: the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem visiting Muslim SS troops.”
Notice the Nazi salute…
As important, or more important, than Eichmann…
According to Dieter Wisliceny, one of Adolf Eichmann’s chief lieutenants in the Final Solution:
“ The Mufti [Hajj Amin] is a sworn enemy of the Jews and has always fought for the idea of annihilating the Jews. He sticks to this idea always, also in his talks with [Adolf] Eichmann ... The Mufti is one of the originators of the systematic destruction of European Jewry by the Germans, and he has become a permanent colleague, partner and adviser to Eichmann...in the implementation of this programme .”
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm Hajj Amin al Husseini
The father of the PLO was… “… in February 1967 the PLO leader [Ahmed Shukeiry] was wounded in an assassination attempt. For the while, as a result, the organization was at least partially immobilized by factional intrigues. Not so a rival, and even more radical Palestinian group in Syria, the Fatah (Arab Liberation Movement), organized several years earlier by veterans of the Mufti’s [Hajj Amin’s] former Arab Higher Committee .” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) “ By … the PLO in its resurrected form was almost entirely Fatah-dominated , and Arafat himself served as president of its executive…” Source: Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time . New York: Knopf. (p.698) YASSER ARAFAT: “… Were they able to replace our hero Hajj Amin al-Husseini ? ... There were a number of attempts to get rid of Hajj Amin, whom they considered an ally of the Nazis. But even so, he lived in Cairo, and participated in the 1948 war, and I was one of his troops .” Said by Yasser Arafat to the London-based pro-PLO puiblication Al Sharq al Awsat, and republished in the Palestinian daily Al Quds, 2 Agosto, 2002. Translated from Arabic by Palestinian Media Watch http://www.pmw.org.il/bulletins-050802.html As we’ve seen, before the World War began, the Mufti Hajj Amin was organizing anti-Jewish terrorist waves in British Mandate “Palestine.” For the last one the terrorists organized themselves as Hajj Amin’s Arab Higher Committee , with weapons furnished by Hitler. It was this same Arab Higher Committee that gave birth to Al Fatah. Soon, Al-Fatah came to own the PLO. In consequence, Al Fatah’s leader, Yasser Arafat, became the leader of the PLO. Yasser Arafat’s mentor and hero was Hajj Amin al Husseini . … Hajj Amin “ The mufti [Hajj Amin] barely escaped trial for [war crimes] by fleeing to Egypt in 1946. There he made young Yasser Arafat, then living in Cairo, his protégé. The mufti secretly imported a former Nazi commando officer into Egypt to teach Mr.. Arafat and other teenage recruits the fine points of guerrilla warfare . Mr.. Arafat learned his lessons well; the mufti was so proud of him he even pretended the two of them were blood relations.” Source: Washington Times; August 9, 2002; "Yasser Arafat: Nazi trained", by David N. Bossie.
President Ronald Reagan was pushing for a PLO state in Israeli territory: the West Bank. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1981
At the same time , the PLO terrorists were attacking Israeli civilians from their bases in Lebanon.
“ ...the PLO shifted its bases to Lebanon and continued its attacks on Israel. The PLO's relations with the Lebanese were tumultuous, and the organization soon became embroiled in Lebanon's sectarian disputes and contributed to that country's eventual slide into civil war.”
Because the PLO was murdering Israeli civilians , Israel invaded Lebanon and launched a
“ campaign that Israel said would wipe out the PLO as a political and military force and open the way for true peace in the Middle East.”
But when the Israeli troops were getting ready to deliver the final blow to the PLO, the US intervened to save the PLO and send it to Tunis .
The Washington Post took note of the contrast between the PLO’s earlier exit from Jordan and this exit from Lebanon:
“ From Amman [Jordan], the PLO troops left unheralded, in ridicule. From Beirut [Lebanon], they left in a compromise negotiated by the United States , waving their Kalashnikov rifles. Arafat left not in the middle of the night but with an emotional dockside sendoff from the Lebanese prime minister, a French Navy escort and U.S. air cover .”
Before the Israeli invasion, the American diplomats in Beirut had their security provided for by… the PLO!
In other words, the Nazi PLO terrorists were the bodyguards of the American diplomats .
"The Lebanese occupation by Israel caused the Palestinians to have to leave Lebanon eventually...They had been the protectors for the American diplomatic community in Beirut...There was liaison with the PLO, and the Americans were depending on them for their security."
Source: Vincent Cannistraro, Director of National Security Council Intelligence from 1984 to 1987.
Although the US saved the PLO in 1982, the PLO was defeated anyway, because from Tunis it was very difficult to kill Israelis.
But the US government undertook to fix this for the PLO, and went quite out of its way to revive this antisemitic terrorist organization.
1991: The United States forces Israel to accept the PLO inside the Jewish state
President George Bush (Sr.)…
… and his Secretary of State James Baker III… … threatened the Israelis for 8 months with the denial of all economic aid, until they forced the Israelis to participate in what became the ‘Oslo process,’ the purpose of which was to bring the PLO from exile, where it was defeated, and into the heart of the Jewish state. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1991
In 1967, the Arab countries neighboring Israel, as they had done in the past, provoked a war whose goal was the extermination of the Israeli Jews.
The Arab states lost, and they lost also some territory.
The Pentagon – which is to say, the US military – carried out a study in the same year of 1967 in order to examine the situation of the Jewish state.
The Pentagon study was not conducted in order to inform Israel. On the contrary, it was kept secret and was not released until the year 1984.
The Six Day War This study concludes that: “ From a strictly military point of view Israel would require the retention of some captured Arab territory in order to provide militarily defensible borders.” Specifically: Israel cannot survive without the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights.
Israel needs to retain the greater part of the West Bank because,
“ This border area [along the West Bank] has traditionally been lightly held by military forces and defenses consist[ing] mainly of small, widely separated outposts and patrols and, therefore, afforded an area where launching of saboteurs and terrorists into Israel was relatively easy...”
And about the Gaza strip, the Pentagon study states that,
“ The Strip, under Egyptian control, provides a salient into Israel a little less than 30 miles long and from four to eight miles wide. It has served as a training area for the Palestine Liberation Army... Occupation of the Strip by Israel would reduce the hostile border by a factor of five and eliminate a source for raids and training of the Palestine Liberation Army.”
HIR has produced a book that documents US foreign policy toward the Jewish state from the 1930s until the present.
It is practically impossible to find a year in which the foreign policy of the United States was not anti-Jewish.
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally.htm The book is regularly updated but the following years are already documented: 1930s, 1930-45, 1945, 1947-48, 1949-53, 1955, 1955-65, 1958, 1964, 1964-1967, 1967, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1974-75, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981, 1982-83, 1985, 1987-88, 1989, 1991, 1994, 2005.
What about the economic aid that Israel receives from the United States?
And does Israel receive so much?
But, What about the weapons Israel gets from the United States?
What Israel gets is very little if it is considered in context, against the financial aid that the enemies of Israel receive. For example, Egypt gets only slightly less than Israel from the United States, and all that money goes to buying weapons. We need also to compare this to what the enemies of Israel get. There is no country in the world that gets more military hardware from the United States than Saudi Arabia, whose king explained to us the importance of destroying Israel. Let us suppose that a ‘friend’ offers you a million dollars, but on condition that you allow a hired assassin, whose job is to kill you, to live in your own house. ¿Seem like a friendly offer? We have seen already that the financial aid Israel gets from the United States was on condition that Israel bring the PLO (the Nazis) inside. http://emperors-clothes.com/news/arming-i.htm
Don't US officials say all the time that the United States supports Israel?
And don’t they explain to everybody that supporting Israel is precisely what defines their foreign policy?
Of course they do say it, and it is very easy to say. And the repetition of it convinces a lot of people. But think about it: What is the effect of this? If everybody is upset with US foreign policy, then, if they are told that it is all being done for the Jews, what is being promoted is ANTISEMITISM!
In 1921, Phillip Graves, from The Times of London , demonstrated on the first page:
that that the conversations between the supposed super powerful Jews had been cut and pasted from the conversations that Joly invented between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.
The title of Maurice Joly’s book is “Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.”
It has got nothing to do with Jews.
Nazi pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!” The Nazis caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ http://emperors-clothes.com/antisem/times-pdf.htm
In the year 2003, The European Union produced an investigation on the state of antisemitism.
This investigation establishes that there has been an alarming (and violent) growth in antisemitism all over Europe.
The European Union initially suppressed the report! But others published it and eventually so did the EU. Nevertheless, it did not receive much publicity, and it is quite obvious that few Jews understand just how alarming their situation has become. http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/eurepantisem.htm
There is an effort to convince people of the same absurdity:
that “the Jews” supposedly control everything in secret in order to hurt us.
But though this is absurd it hardly means that people are not believing it. In World War II millions believed it.
Their leaders told them it was so, and they are telling them again.
We are not talking (only) of obscure and extreme right-wing leaders.
Ralph Nader, candidate for president of the United States
"The days when the chief Israeli puppeteer comes to the United States and meets with the puppet in the White House and then proceeds to Capitol Hill, where he meets with hundreds of other puppets, should be replaced."
The Washington Post quotes Nader and then, for comparison, it quotes what the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi organization in the United States, says: "Bush also repeated the catch-phrase . . . 'committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish state,' which is repeated almost word-for-word again and again by Israel's sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets." Ralph Nader sounds just like the neo-nazis. But he is supposed to be… A LEFTIST! Source: Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64028-2004Aug13.html
“ We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. ”
“ The Europeans killed six million Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.”
Mahathir is saying that the Jews supposedly want to exterminate 1.3 billion Muslims! This is how the Nazis also talked: they said that the Jews supposedly wanted to destroy non-Jews. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
“ We need guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships for our defense. But because we discouraged the learning of science and mathematics, etc, as giving no merit for the akhirat [i.e., the hereafter], today we have no capacity to produce our own weapons for our defense .”
Mahathir said: “ Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine we have not achieved any result. We have in fact worsened our situation...[We must] think. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking.”
Adolf Hitler also said that the Germans needed to “defend” themselves from the Jews. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
Adolf Hitler also spoke of the Jews as if they were a parasite that survived every attack. “ Over the past 50 years of fighting in Palestine we have not achieved any result. We have in fact worsened our situation...[We must] think. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking.” The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
Mahathir made these statements at a summit attended by all chiefs of state in the Muslim world. When he finished, they gave him a standing ovation. The Jews control everything… … and they want us dead!
“ A French diplomat, who asked not to be named, said while Chirac disagreed with Mahathir's strident views, he argued that an EU [European Union] summit declaration 'would not have been appropriate.’”
Source: Associated Press Worldstream; October 19, 2003 Sunday; Section: International News; Distribution: Asia; England; Europe; Britain; Scandinavia; Middle East; Africa; Length: 326 Words; Headline: Malaysian Leader Says France's Chirac 'Understands' His Remarks About Jews; Dateline: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
“ Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohammad [i.e., Mahathir] today expressed his gratitude to French President Jacques Chirac for his 'understanding' of the OIC chairman's speech at the opening of the 10th Organization of the Islamic Conference Summit here.”
Source: New Straits Times (Malaysia); October 19, 2003, Sunday; Section: Nation; Pg. 3; Headline: Dr M expresses gratitude to Chirac for his 'understanding'
George W. Bush, president of the United States
George Bush Jr. did not call Mahathir’s statements antisemitic.
He did not call them outrageous.
He did not call them a direct echo of the German Nazis.
He did not say they were an incitement to genocide.
Instead, George Bush called Mahathir’s statements … “divisive.”
Divisive ! And Hitler’s identical statements? Were they also “divisive” ?
George W. Bush, president of the United States
Mahathir denied that Bush had rebuked him:
“‘ It's the biggest lie. If he had rebuked me I'm quite sure I would have rebuked him also,’ Mahathir was quoted as saying when he arrived home after a series of visits to neighboring countries.
Mahathir said it was common for someone who could lie about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war (in Iraq) to lie about what he had said, the agency reported.
The prime minister told reporters that from what he remembered Bush had pulled him aside at an Asia-Pacific summit in Bangkok last week only to explain why he had made such a strong statement over Mahathir's remarks about Jews.”
Source: Agence France Presse – English October 25, 2003 Saturday; SECTION: International News; LENGTH: 371 words; HEADLINE: Bush did not rebuke me: Mahathir; DATELINE: KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25
In other words, according to Mahathir, Bush did not rebuke him, but on the contrary apologized for having had to make his weak and useless ‘criticism,’ which Bush called ‘strong.’ And what was Bush’s reaction to Mahathir’s accusation that Bush is a liar? According to the same Agence France Presse report, George Bush agreed with Mahathir! “I said [about Mahathir’s statements], 'they're divisive and unnecessary.' I didn't yell at him, I just told him,” the US president told reporters. Bush did not rebuke me. Nonsense! lacks the guts
George W. Bush, president of the United States
Just one month after Mahathir’s speech, Bush said this:
"Israel should freeze settlement construction, dismantle unauthorized outposts, end the daily humiliation of the Palestinian people , and not prejudice final negotiations with the placements of walls and fences."
Source: -- Text of President Bush's Speech, Associated Press Online, November 19, 2003 Wednesday, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, 3930 words
I remind you that Mahathir had said in his speech: “ Is it true that 1.3 billion people can exert no power to save themselves from the humiliation and oppression inflicted upon them by a much smaller enemy?” If “the Jews” really controlled the Western governments, Bush would not be repeating Mahathir’s statements. He would make a very public speech, and would accuse Mahathir of reviving Nazi ideology .
The claims in the “The Protocols” are very popular today
For example, quite a few people believe that:
“ the Jews” control the media
“ the Jews” control the United States, the world superpower
These beliefs are absurd.
If “the Jews” control the United States, then
Why is the Jewish state ceding territory – under pressure from the United States – to Nazis who want to exterminate the Jews?
And if “the Jews” control the media, then
Why is the media eagerly promoting the lie – which already produced a genocide before – that “the Jews” supposedly control the US government?
Therefore, when they are properly informed, they tend to do the right thing.
For example, US citizens defended the Jewish state in 1948 because they understood what was happening. Today very few people defend the Jewish state because they don’t understand that, once again, the Jews are being attacked by the Nazis.
The Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic and Social was created:
to investigate scientifically the causes of conflict; and
to make known to the general public the results of these investigations.
In this way, we mean to counteract the negative influence of the mass media. Why? Because, as we have seen, the mass media does not inform , it disinforms, and the effect is to promote more conflict and injustice.
Our immediate objective : to prevent a genocide
Informing the public about how the mass media really works.
Correcting the lies said about Israel.
Informing the public about the origins of the PLO.
Informing the public about the pro-PLO policies of the US government.
The ideology of most US citizens is in general quite good. They believe in democracy, human rights, tolerance … When they hear the truth, they will oppose their own government, and they will defend Israel, as they did in 1948.
To create a media infrastructure to inform the US (and world) public – fast.
F.A.C.E.S. will finance the creation of strategies that will bring many more people to our web pages so that they may document themselves.
It is important to reach the university students: energetic and idealistic.
It is important to reach a broader and more diverse audience.
We must take advantage of the mass educational potential of film.
The skeleton already exists. HIR already informs a growing number of people. But much more is needed. F.A.C.E.S. will hire more investigators, whose work will refute a greater number of media lies than is at present possible. F.A.C.E.S. will hire translators so that those who cannot read English may also inform themselves. TV advertisements. Newspaper advertisements. T-shirts with ads. Etc. F.A.C.E.S. will finance and organize conferences to educate the university and other publics directly, in the United States and in Israel. This is a public that is eager to do the right thing, but very poorly informed . F.A.C.E.S. will finance the production of documentaries, because in this way we can reach great numbers of people quickly and effectively.