Scalable Intimacy

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

7 comments

Comments 1 - 7 of 7 previous next Post a comment

  • + GrahamRust GrahamRust 8 months ago
    Superb presentation, firstly in style, but then the content is such a concise and well-constructed argument... I really look forward to your developing thoughts. Thanks, G
  • + guest3d62cf guest3d62cf 9 months ago
    great - greatly appreciate more of the same as follow up stats become available. this kind of thing definitely affects those of us who are writing our aptitude with social media as an asset in our business plan. thank you!
  • + guest15ba4 guest15ba4 9 months ago
    Mike, great presentation. It certainly highlights the opportunity that marketing people have by using 'less conventional' methods. A medium like Twitter targets the ideal spot of many brands and services, all without any major investment as you indicated with your example. Thank you!
  • + MikeTrap Michael Troiano 9 months ago
    Author’s response to 'guestb738ee1' - The 24,000 number comes from JP Holecka here: http://powershiftermedia.com/142-battle-of-the-brands-in-the-twittersphere/

    The 70 comes from HubSpot here: http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/twitters-new-users-drive-600-growth-7324/hubspot-twittersphere-average-followers-following-twittergrade-2008jpg/

    Truth is YMMV on these numbers (though the same is true of network TV metrics)... The larger point is that the much lower *reach* of these twitter impressions could still deliver a comparable *result* in terms of impact on what some number of target audience members think, feel, or do.
  • + remco123 Remco Kroes 9 months ago
    nice, thanks.
  • + guestb738ee1 guestb738ee1 9 months ago
    How did you come up with the statistic 'avg. 70 followers = 1,680,000 Impressions'. That is quite impressive, but without an understanding of how this number was generated, it is hard to really believe.
  • + jardac jardac 9 months ago
    Great presentation! thanks.
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

36 Favorites

Scalable Intimacy - Presentation Transcript

  1. Scalable Intimacy Branding in the Age of Social Media ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  2. “ If all of Coke’s plants were burned to the ground, if every one of its employees were to quit, if all of its retail distribution was lost to competitors, if every single remaining tangible asset was sold, the person who owned the rights to the Coke name and trademark could go to any bank in the world… and borrow money to completely rebuild the company.” Brand Aid Brad VanAuken
  3. A “Brand” is not the stimulus … … but the collective emotional response .
  4.  
  5. Your Brand Online Not here. ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved. “ i lovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv zipcar.” “ It's a convenience service, people. I rented a zipcar to play a show in Waltham. In the snow. Awesome idea, and it worked perfectly.” “ Some 10,500 employees of the City of Seattle will now have access to a car at the office for personal errands or business trips, thanks to a new partnership with car-sharing provider Zipcar.” “ Kudos to Zipcar! As promised, they pulled their cars from the dangerous and disgusting Geary/Shannon lot. Nice to see follow-through, guys.”
  6. So are Marketing people stupid? ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  7. Industrial Scale Cuts Unit Cost ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  8. Uniform Demand = Profit ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  9. Products became commodities. Value shifted to relationships . ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  10. Emotional Connection = Profit ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  11. Intimacy requires dialog. ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  12. The Promise of Social Media ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved. Scalable Intimacy More intimate relationships than are possible through broadcast media, at sufficient scale to impact the enterprise
  13. “Sufficient Scale” of What? Reach? Result.
  14. Can You Get There? 24,000 Conversations in 5 hours Avg. 70 followers = 1,680,000 “Impressions”
  15. Can You Get There? What’s the sales impact of 1.7 million affluent, educated, metropolitan early adopters being exposed to each other’s positive and negative views of a brand?
  16. Remember…
    • Brand is the response , not the stimulus
    • Economies of scale drove mass media
    • Relationships needed to differentiate
    • Social networks promise intimacy …
    • At a scale to impact the enterprise.
    ©2009 Michael Troiano. All rights reserved.
  17. Thank you. http://scalableintimacy.com [email_address] twitter: @miketrap
SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

+ Michael TroianoMichael Troiano Nominate

custom

3465 views, 36 favs, 35 embeds more stats

A sensible and specific point-of-view about the bes more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 3465
    • 2677 on SlideShare
    • 788 from embeds
  • Comments 7
  • Favorites 36
  • Downloads 101
Most viewed embeds
  • 174 views on http://blog.futurelab.net
  • 167 views on http://wearesocial.net
  • 117 views on http://blog.freshnetworks.com
  • 105 views on http://scalableintimacy.com
  • 79 views on http://www.socialmediatoday.com

more

All embeds
  • 174 views on http://blog.futurelab.net
  • 167 views on http://wearesocial.net
  • 117 views on http://blog.freshnetworks.com
  • 105 views on http://scalableintimacy.com
  • 79 views on http://www.socialmediatoday.com
  • 20 views on http://sampadswain.com
  • 18 views on http://griffinfarley.typepad.com
  • 18 views on http://www.medienkompakt.de
  • 15 views on http://marketingusabile.blogspot.com
  • 13 views on http://marketear.blogspot.com
  • 8 views on http://socialmediatoday.com
  • 6 views on http://proferotokyo.typepad.com
  • 5 views on http://kellydodson.com
  • 5 views on http://nakedtokyo.typepad.com
  • 4 views on http://concoctionconspirator.blogspot.com
  • 3 views on http://www.concoctionconspirator.blogspot.com
  • 3 views on http://www.marketingusabile.blogspot.com
  • 3 views on http://acidminds.com
  • 3 views on http://www.socialmediabiz.com
  • 2 views on http://sociablecommunications.blogspot.com
  • 2 views on http://www.planetnography.com
  • 2 views on http://www.thestrategyweb.com
  • 2 views on http://www.gaiagranules.blogspot.com
  • 2 views on http://bckds.posterous.com
  • 2 views on http://static.slideshare.net
  • 1 views on http://1256225982.nvmodules.netvibes.com
  • 1 views on http://gaiagranules.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://peterhollard.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://wildfire.gigya.com
  • 1 views on http://krislane.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://presentations.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://sedley.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://www.sociablecommunications.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://socialmediabiz.com
  • 1 views on http://www.futurelab.net

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories