ISMRM 2003 Poster: Spatial Resolution Effects on Permeability-Surface Area Estimation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    ISMRM 2003 Poster: Spatial Resolution Effects on Permeability-Surface Area Estimation - Presentation Transcript

    1. Identifying Tumor Vascular Permeability Heterogeneity Using Reduced Encoding Techniques Michael Aref, Jim Xiuquan Ji, Josh D. Handbury, Keith L. Bailey, Zhi-Pei Liang & Erik C. Wiener University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
      • Hypothesis & Specific Aims
      • We test the hypothesis that in clinical dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) the loss of spatial resolution to gain temporal resolution results in partial volume effects that yield inaccurate permeability-surface area products (PS) which results in erroneous diagnostic information and we offer a potential solution using reduced encoding techniques to solve this problem. Specifically we
        • Compare the PS obtained from DCE MRI at a resolution obtained with standard in vivo MRI human techniques (2500  m resolution), to that obtained with higher resolution techniques, analogous to in vitro histopathological in plane resolutions (938  m and 469  m resolution)
        • Determine the accuracy of PS obtained from Keyhole and R educed-encoding I maging by G eneralized-series R econstruction (RIGR) using high resolution baseline data (469  m resolution) and clinical resolution dynamic data (2500  m resolution).
        • Statistically correlate PS maps obtained from 469  m, 938  m, and 2500  m resolution DCE MRI to histopathologically determined tumor diagnosis based on capillary density and tumor grade.
      • Background
      • Weidner et al determined that the range of microscope fields of view (FOV) for accurately determining tumor type and grade based on capillary density was between 0.152 mm 2 (390.  m diameter) and 0.740 mm 2 (860.  m diameter). These correspond with our 469  469  m and 938  938  m MRI resolutions (Fig. 1).
      • Keyhole uses high-resolution reference data with the central k-space data replaced by dynamic low-resolution data. A fast Fourier transform (FFT) is used to form the active image.
      • RIGR uses a high-resolution reference k-space data set to reconstruct images from the low-resolution dynamic k-space data. RIGR is performed in the phase encode (PE) direction and the readout (RO) direction is transformed by FFT.
      • Two compartment model (Fig. 2):
      • Plasma Compartment:
      • Tumor Compartment:
      Boreal Research Microscope courtesy of Sciencekit.com
      • Materials and Methods
      • Female Sprague Dawley rat N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) induced mammary tumor model (Stoica et al ).
      • SISCO 4.7 T / 33 cm bore system using fast T 1 -weighted gradient echo multislice (GEMS) (TR = 70 ms, TE = 4.7 ms, flip angle = 80°, # slices = 7, thickness = 2 mm, coronal orient., FOV = RO 24 cm/512  PE 6 cm/128, avg. = 4, TA = 35 s + 10 s delay).
      • Data Preparation
      • All low-resolution (> 469  m) data were obtained from central k-space subsets of high-resolution data.
      • 469  m: RO 24 cm/512  PE 6 cm/128
      • 938  m: RO 24 cm/256  PE 6 cm/64
      • 2500  m: RO 24 cm/96  PE 6 cm/24
      • Dynamic: RO 24 cm/512  PE 6 cm/24
      • Normalize rats by fitting plasma compartment for a 1 , a 2 ,  and  (Fig. 2 and Eqn 1)
      • Fit for tumor extravascular extracellular space (EES) volume fraction, v p , tumor plasma volume fraction, v e , and contrast agent transfer rate constant K p  t /V T (K p  t = PS) for each voxel within tumor ROI (Fig. 2, 3 and Eqn 2)
      • Filtering by dropping points that
        • do not converge
        • physiologically unrealistic
        • were poorly fit (r 2 ≤ 0.5)
      • Results
      • Effect of Resolution on PS (Fig. 4-6)
        • Comparison of top five K p  t /V T “hot spots” based on resolution.
      • PS from Keyhole and RIGR (Fig. 6-8)
        • Comparison of top five K p  t /V T “hot spots” based on reduced encoding technique.
      • PS-based diagnosis
        • Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) (n=5)
        • Non-infiltrating Papillary Carcinoma (n=3)
        • Comparison of IDC and NPC top five K p  t /V T (PS) “hot spots” and their corresponding v e as a function of resolution.
      • Conclusions
      • PS estimation is resolution-limited.
      • Detection of PS “hot spots” requires a spatial resolution window that includes the 469  m to 938  m resolutions if accurate differential tumor diagnosis is to succeed.
      • Keyhole produces images of poor quality and cannot detect PS “hot spots” of similar value as FFT.
      • RIGR has superior image quality to Keyhole and agrees with FFT on the magnitude of PS “hot spot”.
      • The top five K p  t /V T “hot spots” and their corresponding v e can differentiate infiltrating ductal carcinomas from non-infiltrating papillary carcinomas at 469  m and 938  m resolutions but not at clinical MRI resolution (2500  m)
      Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Eqn 1 Eqn 2 The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Susanne Aref and PHS Grant Number 1 R01 CA87009-01, awarded by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute 2500  m Keyhole RIGR 469  m 938  m Figure 4 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 5
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Mike ArefMike Aref Nominate

    custom

    121 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    This project attempts to use the optimal parameters more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 121
      • 121 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories