Kawecki, Barbara, and Michael Levine-Clark, “NISO’s DDA Initiative: Cross-Industry Stakeholders Express PDA to Improve the Landscape for All,” Charleston Conference, Charleston, S.C., November 9, 2012.
NISO’s DDA Initiative: CrossIndustry Stakeholders Express PDAto Improve the Landscape for AllCharleston ConferenceNovember 8, 2012Barbara Kawecki, YBP Library ServicesBKawecki@ybp.comMichael Levine-Clark, University of Denvermichael.email@example.com
DefinitionsPublic Display of Affection (PDA) An act of physical intimacy in the view of others.Portable Digital Assistant (PDA) An obsolete digital device.
DefinitionsPatron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) Acquisition of library materials based on direct or indirect patron input, including faculty requests and analysis of collection usageDemand-Driven Acquisition (DDA) Acquisition of library materials based on patron selection at the point of need.
Why DDA?Rebalance collection from possible use toward immediate need Make many more titles available to users A broader, deeper collection Spend same amount for greater access or less for same access
Why Do We Need Best Practices?Management of the “consideration pool” – the titles available for purchase or lease Rules for: Adding titles Keeping unowned titles available Removing titles Managing records
A New Way of Thinking AboutAcquisitionAn evolution from getting books into the collection ToLong-term management of discovery tools that allow for demand-driven access to monographs
A Disruption to the EntirePublishing Supply ChainUncertainty for scholarly publishersNew role for approval vendors From booksellers to service providersChanging role for academic libraries Stewardship vs accessPotentially similar issues for public libraries, trade publishers
Components of DDA Free discovery of content Set amount of time in the entire book Set number of pages Front and back matter Temporary lease Purchase Tools and strategies for automated management of the consideration pool
Goals Develop a flexible model for DDA that works for publishers, vendors, aggregators, and libraries. Allow for DDA plans that Meet local budget and collection needs Allow for consortial participation Allow for cross-aggregator implementation Account for how DDA impacts all functional areas of the library
DeliverablesRecommendations for Managing and populating the consideration pool Developing consistent models for Free discovery Temporary lease Purchase
Deliverables Recommendations for Methods for managing multiple formats (p&e) Ways to incorporate print-on-demand (POD) Development of tools and strategies to measure use Implementation at the local and consortial levels Providing long-term access to unowned e-book content
Timeline Appointment of working group Aug 2012 Approval of charge, initial work Oct 2012 plan Completion of information gathering June 2013 Completion of initial draft Aug 2013 Gathering of public comments Sept 2013 Completion of final draft Dec 2013
The CommitteeCo-Chairs Barbara Kawecki, YBP Library Services Michael Levine-Clark, University of DenverLiaison from Business Information Committee Norm Medeiros, Haverford College
Subcommittees Technical Issues Profiling Identifying titles for inclusion Identify tiles for removal Loading/updating/removing records Automated notification about changed availability of titles Managing order process, queuing for acquisitions
Subcommittees Technical Issues (continued) Managing e/p duplication Managing authentication POD as an option Consortial models if they differ from local models Long-term availability of content Guarantees of availability of un-owned titles Preservation solutions
Technical Issues Committee Members Scott Bourns, JSTOR Lisa Mackinder, UC Irvine Lisa Nachtigall, Wiley David Whitehair, OCLC
Subcommittees Access Models Free discovery Temporary access Purchase Single vs. multiple users Implications for publishers Consortial models if they differ from local Long-term availability of content Guarantees of availability of un-owned content Financial implications
Access Models Committee Members Lenny Allen, Oxford University Press Karin Byström, Uppsala University Terry Ehling, Project Muse Rochelle Logan, Douglas County Libraries Cory Polonetsky, Elsevier Dana Sharvit, Ex Libris
SubcommitteesMetrics Cross-aggregator Local vs. consortial Development of spending predictions based on usage Analyses of referral sources
Metrics Committee Members Stephen Bosch, University of Arizona Lorraine Keelan, Palgrave Macmillan Kari Paulson, EBL Jason Price, Claremont Colleges