Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.

634

Published on

Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March …

Levine-Clark, Michael, and Barbara Kawecki, “Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group,” Electronic Resources & Libraries, Austin, March 17, 2014.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
634
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
9
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Best Practices for Demand-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Recommendations of the NISO DDA Working Group ER&L – Austin March 17, 2014 Barbara Kawecki YBP Library Services Michael Levine-Clark University of Denver
  • 2. Goals • Develop a flexible model for DDA that works for publishers, vendors, aggregators, and libraries. • Model should allow for DDA programs that – Meet local budget and collection needs – Allow for consortial participation – Support cross-aggregator implementation – Account for how DDA impacts all functional areas of the library
  • 3. Timeline • Appointment of working group • Information gathering – Main survey completed – Interviews – Additional surveys • Public libraries • consortia – Information gathering completed • Completion of initial draft • Gathering of public comments • Completion of final report Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Nov 2013 Mar 2014 Mar-Apr 2014 May 2014
  • 4. Committee members • Lenny Allen Oxford University Press • Stephen Bosch University of Arizona • Scott Bourns JSTOR • Karin Byström Uppsala University • Terry Ehling Project Muse • Barbara Kawecki YBP Library Services • Lorraine Keelan Palgrave Macmillan • Michael Levine-Clark University of Denver • Rochelle Logan Douglas County Libraries • Lisa Mackinder University of California, Irvine • Norm Medeiros Haverford College • Lisa Nachtigall Wiley • Kari Paulson ProQuest • Cory Polonetsky Elsevier • Jason Price SCELC • Dana Sharvit Ex Libris • David Whitehair OCLC
  • 5. RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 6. 1. Establishing Goals • Four Broad Goals for DDA – Saving Money – Spending The Same Amount of Money More Wisely – Providing Broader Access – Building a Permanent Collection via Patron Input
  • 7. Saving Money • Providing access to fewer books • Emphasizing temporary access (STLs) over perpetual access (purchasing) • In evidence-based programs, having a higher usage threshold prior to purchase
  • 8. Spending Same Amount More Wisely • Larger pool of titles, emphasis on temporary access • Smaller pool of titles, emphasis on perpetual access
  • 9. Providing Broader Access • Most expansive pool possible • Emphasizing STLs over perpetual access • In evidence-based programs, having a higher usage threshold prior to purchase
  • 10. Building a Permanent Collection via Patron Input • Having a tightly-focused profile/smaller consideration pool • Emphasizing perpetual access over STLs • In evidence-based programs, having a lower usage threshold prior to purchase
  • 11. 2. Choosing Content to Make Available • Important Issues – Not all p-books available as e-books – No single supplier provides all e-books – Not all e-books available via DDA or under same models • Therefore – More comprehensive coverage requires more suppliers and more models – Broadest coverage possible = include print – Approval vendors can help manage DDA across multiple suppliers • Publishers should recognize that libraries may wish to limit number of suppliers, and plan accordingly
  • 12. 3. Choosing DDA Models Mix of auto-purchase and STL based on goals of program • Auto-Purchase – Purchase triggered on the first use longer than free browse – Purchase triggered after set number of uses – Purchase triggered after set number of STLs • STL – A set number of STLs prior to auto-purchase – Only STLs, with no auto-purchase
  • 13. 3. Choosing DDA Models • Evidence-based acquisition – Sometimes only option based on platform capabilities – Library and publisher should develop expectations based on analysis of past usage • Publishers may wish to participate in some or all models. • Some concern by publishers about sustainability of STL
  • 14. 4. Profiling • DDA profiles should be based on the broadest definitions possible within these areas, and relative to goals of the program – Subject coverage should provide access to a wide range of content, even in subjects that may not be core – Retrospective coverage for critical mass • Especially in programs that otherwise limit coverage • May or may not overlap with print holdings, depending on library preference
  • 15. 5. Loading Records • Libraries should – Load records regularly and as soon after receipt as possible – Load records into as many discovery tools as possible – Code records for easy suppression or removal – Enrich metadata to increase discoverability – Load point-of-purchase records after purchase to ease acquisitions workflow/payment
  • 16. 6. Removing Content • Libraries should: – Remove records from all discovery tools as soon as feasible, often using supplier’s delete file – Establish regular cycle for removal – Maintain a record of titles removed for assessment
  • 17. 7. Assessment • There are multiple reasons for assessment, so this should be planned from the start – Measuring overall effectiveness of the program – Measuring success at cost reduction – Measuring usage – Predicting future spending – Managing the consideration pool • Data sources might include – COUNTER reports – Vendor/publisher supplied reports – ILS or other local data
  • 18. 8. Preservation Libraries and publishers should work together to ensure that un-owned content remains available, perhaps in partnership with third- party solutions such as LOCKSS and Portico.
  • 19. 9. Consortial DDA • Three basic models – Multiplier (a multiple of list price allows shared ownership) – Limited Use (shared ownership, but with a cap on use before a second copy purchased) – Buying Club (shared access to consideration pool, but individual ownership)
  • 20. 10. Public Library DDA • Mediated • Wish lists • Often not through the catalog
  • 21. Recommended Practice Presentation will be on Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/MichaelLevineClark Document will be available for public comment by 3/31/14 at http://www.niso.org
  • 22. Questions, Comments, Suggestions Barbara Kawecki bkawecki@ybp.com Michael Levine-Clark michael.levine-clark@du.edu

×