Building Better Collections on Demand: DDA at the University of Denver

710 views
626 views

Published on

Levine-Clark, Michael, “Building Better Collections on Demand: DDA at the University of Denver,” Invited. SCELC Colloquium, Los Angeles, February 29, 2012.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
710
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • US – Library and Book Trade Almanac 2010, p. 485. 2009 preliminary data.
  • Slide from Michael Zeoli, YBP
  • 325 titles purchased – not included in Total (10,076) since they are also part of the list of titles with at least one STL. 3,599 titles with at least one STL. Total Number of STLs is 5,337 across those 3,599 titlesCalculations of list price are based on the average cost of the 325 books actually purchased ($73.09)
  • Building Better Collections on Demand: DDA at the University of Denver

    1. 1. Building Better Collections on Demand: DDA at the University of Denver Michael Levine-Clark Collections Librarian University of Denver SCELC Colloquium February 29, 2012
    2. 2. Definitions Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA)  Faculty Requests/Input  Use Data Demand-Driven Acquisition (DDA)  Meets immediate need
    3. 3. Why DDA?
    4. 4. Annual Book Production, 2009 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 DU Purchases North All United World American States (UNESCO) Scholarly (YBP)
    5. 5. PDA Opportunity for Publishers & Libraries YBP JULY 2010 - JUNE 2011 PDA Opportunity Slip New Print Notification Notifications Publisher Titles s % Ordered Sent Springer 3,261 1,177,454 4% Wiley 2,881 1,219,333 7% Oxford 2,146 921,359 11% Routledge 2,200 1,099,110 8% Cambridge 1,551 736,043 11% Palgrave 1,310 1,006,981 8% Macmillan McGraw-Hill 637 218,244 6% HarperCollins 410 144,881 11% ABC-CLIO 409 214,167 8% Continuum 518 243,636 8% Brill (& Nijhoff) 573 197,895 8%
    6. 6. Books Cataloged 2000-2004 (126,953 Titles) 4+ uses, 18.8% 0 uses, 39.6% 3 uses, 8.2% 2 uses, 12.8% 1 use, 20.6%
    7. 7. Books Cataloged 2000-2004 (126,953 Titles) 4+ uses, $1,084, 576 0 3 uses, $2,284, uses, $473,06 532 0 2 1 uses, $738,43 use, $1,188,4 5 18
    8. 8. Demand-Driven Acquisitions Goals Broaden the collection  More titles  More publishers  More subjects Match acquisitions to immediate demand  Pay at point of need  Pay for amount of need  Short-term loans  Purchase-on-demand
    9. 9. Redefining the Collection Everything we can provide in a timely manner Ultimately, bounded only by budget
    10. 10. What We’ve Done at DU
    11. 11. netLibrary Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries 1999-2005 First use free Purchase on second use Shared access
    12. 12. Purchase ILL Requests Price Publisher Publication Date
    13. 13. eBook Library (EBL) Began May 2010 Loaded 42,000 records into catalog (now 72,000) No budget for FY 2010 Budgeted $150,000 for FY 2011
    14. 14. The EBL Model First five minutes free STL for three uses  One day or one week  10-15% list price Purchase on fourth use  List price
    15. 15. DU EBL Data (5/1/10-6/30/11) Actual List325 titles purchased $23,753 $23,7533,599 titles with at least $49,171 $236,037one STL6,477 titles with at least $0 $473,378one browseTotal (10,401 titles) $72,924 $733,168Savings $660,244
    16. 16. Cost Per TransactionPurchase Type Total Cost Cost per Transaction STL $49,171 $9.21Autopurchase $23,753 $73.09
    17. 17. Relation to Print Holdings Same Edition 13.7% Same Edition Checked Out 8.0% Earlier Edition(s) 6.0% Earler Edition(s) 0.8% Checked Out 0.5% Library Use Only 70.3% 0.7% Other No Print
    18. 18. What We Want to Do at DU
    19. 19. A Multi-Format Model E-Books from multiple vendors/publishers Print books  When electronic not available  When electronic not desired Managed by YBP
    20. 20. The Future E-Books on demand Local print-on-demand option Make accessible all that we can afford
    21. 21. Budget Goals Commit most of the monographs budget Spend the same to access more titles
    22. 22. Long-Term Management of the Consideration Pool
    23. 23. Filling the Pool Approval process Broader criteria Inclusion rather than exclusion
    24. 24. Adding/Removing Records Discovery is key Must be automatic Approval vendor MARC record service
    25. 25. Pool Maintenance Rules for  Length of time in pool  Removal  Replacement
    26. 26. Removal of Titles Removal because of content, quality Removal because of financial risk Rules for temporary removal Rules for permanent removal
    27. 27. Use Shapes the Pool Titles that are used remain available a bit longer  Removing titles = unhappy users
    28. 28. A Permanent Collection Some titles are core  Establish criteria for permanent/longer-term availability  Title-by-title Series Publisher Subject
    29. 29. Role for Vendors Fill the pool Provide discovery tools Remove/replace content Comprehensive reporting
    30. 30. Questions What about stewardship? Will DDA work for consortia?
    31. 31. Thank You Michael Levine-Clark Collections Librarian University of Denvermichael.levine-clark@du.edu

    ×