Tracking the Stimulus Eileen Norcross Sr. Research Fellow State and Local Policy Project The Mercatus Center at George Mason University July 23, 2009
Why is it hard to track federal money?
What kinds of data do government agencies collect and why?
Compliance
Performance Measurement
Communicating with Citizens?
Oversight déjà vu?
The Stimulus is unique because of its size
and its intents
Majority of programs (73 of 109 funded) in
place years, or decades.
How do we know what programs buy?
Agencies do collect data on programs
Programs are monitored by agencies, GAO, IGs
Range of detail, quality, timeliness, meaningfulness
Details and Consistency
Not required of agencies until the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006
The Community Development Block Grant
“ What does the federal government buy with CDBG dollars?”
72 possible activities
Hundreds of cities
Thousands of sub-grantees
Impossible to get a national picture?
Starting with HUD $343,060,052.01 Subtotal for: Economic Development $29,144,861.15 Micro-Enterprise Assistance ED 18C $41,074,274.30 ED Direct: Technical Assistance ED 18B $152,856,479.58 ED Direct: Financial Assistance to For-Profit Businesses ED 18A $11,712,949.15 Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements ED 17D $15,747,891.58 Commercial/Industrial Building Acquisition, Construction, Rehabilitation ED 17C $50,858,564.42 Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development ED 17B $10,842,712.40 Commercial/Industrial Land Acquisition/Disposition ED 17A $30,822,319.43 Rehabilitation: Publicly or Privately Owned Commercial/Industrial ED 14E
Approach from the state/city level
PDFs for individual cities
Jersey City, N.J.
$1.76 million on housing rehab in 2008
Finding Out
Where, What, Who? Try the City’s CAPER report
e.g. “$5000 to YMCA for building repairs”
Need to read thousands of CAPERs or PDFs of CAPERs
If you dig, you’ll find. But, it’s impossible to get trends, relationships, perspectives
Meant to fill the void: Basic, meaningful details on individual transactions for all contracts, grants, and assistance programs in a searchable, structured, open format.
Where do CDBG dollars go?
Grant data is available, searchable, downloadable structured formats
Bergen City, N.J. $10.4 million CDBG in 2008
But, details are slow to appear.
Details are Required by Law
USASpending.gov is working on subgrant data
Why so slow?
Moving from old to new reporting structures between state, local and federal.
Each agency has its own data reporting practices, systems, relationships with grantees
Data collection is not ‘real-time’ but driven by compliance reports.
CDBG and the Mayors
Yet, the Mayors know what CDBG buys.
The Federal Government and individual citizens, don’t always.
USCM provided transaction-level, meaningful, straightforward details for the nation, in a timely – anticipatory – fashion.
Stimulus Genesis
Governors and Mayors ask for bailout in September/October 2008
Congress asks how money should be spent
Shovel Ready The US Conference of Mayors Report “Ready-to-go” in October 2008
When states and cities accept federal funds
Transparency is required where public dollars change hands.
Accountability rests with those who disburse it.
The most meaningful data is where the money is spent.
USASpending.gov is progress in the right direction
The Mayor’s Report: The Right Idea
Transaction-level, meaningful, basic details
Online
Citizens can evaluate it
It hasn’t been updated since
What Can Congress Do?
A full “household” accounting of public spending is owed to the people.
Citizens are best placed to evaluate spending where dollars “hit the ground.” Knowledge is dispersed.
Principles for collecting and disseminating spending data.
Old-time hierarchical reporting vs. cyberspace and crowdsourcing
Closing Thoughts
Stimulus shines a light on the state of fiscal federalism
40+ years of grants-in-aid to states…why the continuing mysteries?
0 comments
Post a comment