Tabularium presentation

185 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
185
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Tabularium presentation

  1. 1. Nita Chen, Breeawn Cherry, Joanna Huang, Nancy Lam, Raquel Portillo, John Rauch, Melissa Wedeen
  2. 2.  Tab browsing is more than just utilizing tabs  Interview user population: college students
  3. 3.  Interviews: 49 interviews total ◦ 25 Contextual interviews ◦ 7 task-oriented contextual interviews (vacation plans) ◦ 17 prototype interviews  Two categories of users ◦ Multi-tabs user vs. few-tabs user ◦ Browser-savvy user vs. non-browser-savvy user
  4. 4. Alex: Multiple Tab user Karen: Few Tab User
  5. 5. Amy: Non Browser Savvy User Jordan: Browser Savvy User
  6. 6.  Difficulty keeping track of tabs when open too many  Accidentally closing tabs ◦ Do not know how to recover tabs ◦ Unable to recover tabs and cannot recall what was previously opened  Inefficiency of search history ◦ Organization in Search History not user-friendly ◦ Past tabs can be found using search engines (ex. Google)
  7. 7.  Tab usage varies among users  People like to remember their websites  Multiple tabs can cause confusion  Users do not like pop up windows  Efficiency is important to users
  8. 8.  Goal: to improve activity history functionality in browser usage  Proposed product: annotated version of search history  Product audience: multi-tab users that frequently engage in research-type activities ◦ Ex. researchers, college students, etc
  9. 9. Creation and Revolution
  10. 10.  Organization  Visual appeal  Flexibility
  11. 11.  Users: organize fictional activity history with associated icons/website screenshots  Prefer website screenshots to icons  Prefer to have relational branching  Prefer minimalization and not too many items displayed at once
  12. 12. By  FanTABulous
  13. 13. By  FanTABulous
  14. 14. By  FanTABulous
  15. 15. By  FanTABulous
  16. 16.  Categories of organization ◦ Type: alphabetical, type ◦ Chronological  Results ◦ Preference: timeline > frequency > alphabetical ◦ Scroll function to zoom in/out of timeline ◦ Prefer minimalist view ◦ Targets of search: when or what
  17. 17. By  FanTABulous
  18. 18. By  FanTABulous
  19. 19. By  FanTABulous
  20. 20. By  FanTABulous 4 M onths ago 2 M onths ago 1 M onth ago 2 W eeks ago 6 M onths ago 12 H ours ago 2 D ays ago 1 W eek ago 1 H our ago N ow
  21. 21. By  FanTABulous 4 M onths ago 1 M onth ago 2 W eeks ago 12 H ours ago 2 D ays ago 1 W eek ago 1 H our ago N ow 6 M onths ago 2 M onths ago 20 M in ago
  22. 22.  Include scroll time function  Minimalist appearance: show linear timeline first, expand upon search  Search function  Proposed features (not tested yet) ◦ Color coding for “important” websites ◦ Branching of websites to show relational links
  23. 23.  Definition of “Importance”  How to organize thumbnail ◦ Thumbnail groupings  Color coding functions ◦ Inactive websites ◦ Website “bookmarking”
  24. 24.  Options  Options  Options…

×