Transforming the Office Management of Heart Failure Using the Chronic Disease Model in a Family Medicine Residency Program

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Transforming the Office Management of Heart Failure Using the Chronic Disease Model in a Family Medicine Residency Program - Presentation Transcript

    1. Transforming the Office Management of Heart Failure Using the Chronic Disease Model in a Family Medicine Residency Program Rhett Brown, M.D. Janice Huff, M.D. Eric Schneider, Pharm.D. Department of Family Medicine Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC Carolinas HealthCare System
    2. Acute Care Model
      • Patient Initiated: “Doc, I am sick!”
      • Brief
      • Limited planning by the clinician
      • Works well for the acute limited problem
    3. Current status of Chronic Illness Care in the U.S.
      • 27% of hypertensives are adequately treated
      • 29% and 26% of diabetics have well controlled lipid and blood pressure levels, respectively
      • 35% of eligible patients with atrial fibrillation receive anticoagulation
      • 25% of people with depression are receiving adequate treatment
      • 50% of discharged CHF patients are readmitted within 90 days
    4. Chronic Illness
      • 100 million persons in the US have at least 1 chronic illness
      • 50 Million have more than 1
      • 88% over age 65 have at least 1 chronic illness
      • 22% over age 65 have 4 chronic illnesses
    5. Quality Chasm
      • Institute of Medicine report in 1999 described the “Quality Chasm” in delivery of health care
      • Institute of Medicine has proposed the redesign of primary care to close the quality chasm between current practices and optimal standards
    6. System Change Concepts Why a Chronic Care Model?
      • Emphasis on physician, not system, behavior
      • Characteristics of successful interventions weren’t being categorized usefully
      • Commonalities across chronic conditions unappreciated.
    7. Knowledge versus Performance
      • Physicians know how to treat chronic diseases
        • They know what tests should be ordered and what medications should be prescribed
      • What services are actually being provided fall far short of best practice standards
      • We have a systems problem
    8. The Watchword Systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve
    9. Remember:
      • We cannot work harder (systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve)
      • We must work SMARTER!
      • We must work as a TEAM!
      • We must change OUR system
    10. Chronic Care Model
    11.  
    12. Our Clinical Transformation
      • Why HF
        • Relatively small population
        • Impact on our health care system is large
        • Well defined and accepted guidelines
        • Energy within our hospital system for improved outpatient management
    13. Our Clinical Transformation
      • Determine best practice benchmarks and work to decrease inter-physician variability
      • Researched published data on best HF outpatient management system design
      • Developed a concept for an improved healthcare delivery model
    14. Clinical Transformation Committee
        • Administration
        • Clinicians / Support staff
        • Education
        • Research
        • Information Systems
        • Nursing
        • Pharmacy
        • Community Resources
      • Clinical Transformation Committee is multidisciplinary and meets monthly.
      • Key members:
      • Steering committee meets weekly to maintain momentum and monitor progress
    15. Registry Definition
      • A computerized chronic disease registry is a computer application to collect and manage condition-specific data for a group of patients in order to support organized clinical care.
    16. Critical Features of a Registry
      • Identification of patients with a common illness
      • Capture data elements electronically
      • Real-time availability
      • Searchable
      • Linked to established guidelines
      • Feedback to providers
      • Enhance generation of letters to patients
    17. Registry Functions Patient Information entered into Registry Point of care data for patient visits Status reports provide clinician feedback Identify patients needing follow-up care
    18. Why Use a Registry?
      • Institute of Medicine report in 1999 described the “Quality Chasm” in delivery of health care
      • Institute of Medicine has proposed the redesign of primary care to close the quality chasm between current practices and optimal standards
      • The registry is one way to narrow the chasm
    19. Why Use a Registry?
      • Ensure regular follow-up
      • Ensure use of evidence-based guidelines
      • Provide reminders for clinicians (and patients)
      • Facilitate planned care visits
      • Monitor performance of practice team
      • Enable population management
      • Enable task delegation to team members
      • … TO CHANGE SYSTEMS
    20. CVDEMS Flow Sheet
    21. CVDEMS Visit Note
    22. CVDEMS Visit Note
    23. CVDEMS Visit Note
    24. CVDEMS Flow Sheet
    25. Services Needed/Recommendations
    26. CVDEMS Decision Rules
      • LDL
      • Serum creatinine
      • Serum potassium
      • Aspirin therapy
      • ACEI / ARB therapy
      • Beta Blocker therapy
      • Statin therapy
      • Spironolactone therapy
      • Hydralazine/Nitrate
      • Coumadin in A Fib
      • CTC Study Consent
      • Assessment of LVEF
      • ECHO
      • Heart Failure Education
      • Pharmacy Consult
      • Pneumovax
      • Influenza Vaccine
    27. Decision Tools
    28. Services Needed/Recommendations
    29. Patient Goal Setting
    30. Patient Goal Setting
    31. Patient Goal Setting
    32. Heart Failure Action Plan
      • Analogous to an Asthma action plan
      • Part of patient self management component
    33. Heart Failure Action Plan
    34. Care Coordinator
      • Adapted our current nurse triage positions
      • Two RN Care Coordinators provide continuity
      • Additional training in HF management
      • Contact all HF patients after office visits
      • Contact all patients on a regular schedule based on HF severity
      • Follow standing orders for management of mild exacerbations
    35. Patient Support Group
      • Initially held a patient focus group
      • From focus group recommendations developed
        • Monthly support group
        • HF disease education
        • Opportunity for residents to participate in patient education and facilitating a group
    36. Measure Outcomes
      • Hospitalization rates
      • Quality of life scores
      • Medication refill compliance
    37. Lessons Learned
      • Difficulty and time required to navigate the IRB and RRC process
      • Communicating and achieving ‘buy-in’ when working with part-time providers
      • Cultural change takes TIME and PERSERVERANCE
      • Awareness of subcultures within our office
    38. “ Well, I do have this recurring dream that one day I might see some results.”
    39.  
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + MedicineAndHealthUSAMedicineAndHealthUSA Nominate

    custom

    326 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 326
      • 326 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 11
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories