Transforming the Office Management of Heart Failure Using the Chronic Disease Model in a Family Medicine Residency Program - Presentation Transcript
Transforming the Office Management of Heart Failure Using the Chronic Disease Model in a Family Medicine Residency Program Rhett Brown, M.D. Janice Huff, M.D. Eric Schneider, Pharm.D. Department of Family Medicine Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC Carolinas HealthCare System
Acute Care Model
Patient Initiated: “Doc, I am sick!”
Brief
Limited planning by the clinician
Works well for the acute limited problem
Current status of Chronic Illness Care in the U.S.
27% of hypertensives are adequately treated
29% and 26% of diabetics have well controlled lipid and blood pressure levels, respectively
35% of eligible patients with atrial fibrillation receive anticoagulation
25% of people with depression are receiving adequate treatment
50% of discharged CHF patients are readmitted within 90 days
Chronic Illness
100 million persons in the US have at least 1 chronic illness
50 Million have more than 1
88% over age 65 have at least 1 chronic illness
22% over age 65 have 4 chronic illnesses
Quality Chasm
Institute of Medicine report in 1999 described the “Quality Chasm” in delivery of health care
Institute of Medicine has proposed the redesign of primary care to close the quality chasm between current practices and optimal standards
System Change Concepts Why a Chronic Care Model?
Emphasis on physician, not system, behavior
Characteristics of successful interventions weren’t being categorized usefully
Commonalities across chronic conditions unappreciated.
Knowledge versus Performance
Physicians know how to treat chronic diseases
They know what tests should be ordered and what medications should be prescribed
What services are actually being provided fall far short of best practice standards
We have a systems problem
The Watchword Systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve
Remember:
We cannot work harder (systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve)
We must work SMARTER!
We must work as a TEAM!
We must change OUR system
Chronic Care Model
Our Clinical Transformation
Why HF
Relatively small population
Impact on our health care system is large
Well defined and accepted guidelines
Energy within our hospital system for improved outpatient management
Our Clinical Transformation
Determine best practice benchmarks and work to decrease inter-physician variability
Researched published data on best HF outpatient management system design
Developed a concept for an improved healthcare delivery model
Clinical Transformation Committee
Administration
Clinicians / Support staff
Education
Research
Information Systems
Nursing
Pharmacy
Community Resources
Clinical Transformation Committee is multidisciplinary and meets monthly.
Key members:
Steering committee meets weekly to maintain momentum and monitor progress
Registry Definition
A computerized chronic disease registry is a computer application to collect and manage condition-specific data for a group of patients in order to support organized clinical care.
Critical Features of a Registry
Identification of patients with a common illness
Capture data elements electronically
Real-time availability
Searchable
Linked to established guidelines
Feedback to providers
Enhance generation of letters to patients
Registry Functions Patient Information entered into Registry Point of care data for patient visits Status reports provide clinician feedback Identify patients needing follow-up care
Why Use a Registry?
Institute of Medicine report in 1999 described the “Quality Chasm” in delivery of health care
Institute of Medicine has proposed the redesign of primary care to close the quality chasm between current practices and optimal standards
The registry is one way to narrow the chasm
Why Use a Registry?
Ensure regular follow-up
Ensure use of evidence-based guidelines
Provide reminders for clinicians (and patients)
Facilitate planned care visits
Monitor performance of practice team
Enable population management
Enable task delegation to team members
… TO CHANGE SYSTEMS
CVDEMS Flow Sheet
CVDEMS Visit Note
CVDEMS Visit Note
CVDEMS Visit Note
CVDEMS Flow Sheet
Services Needed/Recommendations
CVDEMS Decision Rules
LDL
Serum creatinine
Serum potassium
Aspirin therapy
ACEI / ARB therapy
Beta Blocker therapy
Statin therapy
Spironolactone therapy
Hydralazine/Nitrate
Coumadin in A Fib
CTC Study Consent
Assessment of LVEF
ECHO
Heart Failure Education
Pharmacy Consult
Pneumovax
Influenza Vaccine
Decision Tools
Services Needed/Recommendations
Patient Goal Setting
Patient Goal Setting
Patient Goal Setting
Heart Failure Action Plan
Analogous to an Asthma action plan
Part of patient self management component
Heart Failure Action Plan
Care Coordinator
Adapted our current nurse triage positions
Two RN Care Coordinators provide continuity
Additional training in HF management
Contact all HF patients after office visits
Contact all patients on a regular schedule based on HF severity
Follow standing orders for management of mild exacerbations
Patient Support Group
Initially held a patient focus group
From focus group recommendations developed
Monthly support group
HF disease education
Opportunity for residents to participate in patient education and facilitating a group
Measure Outcomes
Hospitalization rates
Quality of life scores
Medication refill compliance
Lessons Learned
Difficulty and time required to navigate the IRB and RRC process
Communicating and achieving ‘buy-in’ when working with part-time providers
Cultural change takes TIME and PERSERVERANCE
Awareness of subcultures within our office
“ Well, I do have this recurring dream that one day I might see some results.”
0 comments
Post a comment