Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide


  1. 1. OSTEONECROSIS OF THE JAW (ONJ)Fosamax (Generic: Alendronate, manufactured by Merck, was approved by the FDA in1995. Fosamax was originally prescribed to treat osteoporosis and Pagets disease.Fosamax is a type of drug known as a bisphosphonate. Three others of interest are Aredia(Generic: Pamidromate), Zometa (Generic: Zoledronate) and Actonel (Generic:Risedronate).A connection between Fosamax and other bisphosphonates with a serious bone diseasecalled Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) was found. This condition is also known as DeadJaw. This finding was published in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Thisprompted the FDA and the manufacturer of Fosamax to issue a warning to health careprofessionals on September 24, 2004.A search of the Adverse Event Reports (AERS) database, posted March 3, 2005, found139 cases of osteonecrosis (bone death), 47 with pamidronate, 33 with zoledronic acidand 59 in patients receiving both drugs. Twelve cases were found in alendronate patientsand one in risedronate patients.Bisphosphonates are commonly used in tablet form to prevent and treat osteoporosis inpost- menopausal women. Stronger forms given orally or intravenously (IV) arecommonly used in the management of advanced cancers that have metastasized to thebone, where the disease often causes bone pain and possibly even fractures. Manycancers can involve or metastasize to the bones including, but not limited to, lung cancer,breast cancer, prostate cancer, multiple myeloma, and others.When bisphosphonates are given in cancer chemotherapy, the drugs may not only begiven intravenously but for longer periods of time. There have been reports that bothmodalities, tablets or IV solutions, can cause osteonecrosis of the jaw. ONJ is a conditionin which the bone tissue in the jaw fails to heal after minor or major, such as toothextraction, causing the bone to be exposed. This exposure can eventually lead toinfection and maybe even fracture which will require long-term antibiotic therapy orsurgery to remove the dying bone tissue. It is extremely important that prevention andearly treatment of patients using bisphosphonates be undertaken to preserve the jawboneand other bones of the body.Bisphosphonates are a unique class of drugs. As a family, they are characterizedpharmacologically by their ability to inhibit bone resorption, whereas,pharmaeokinetically, they are classified by their similarity in absorption, distribution, andelimination. Although all bisphosphonates have similar physicochemical properties, theirantiresorbing activities differ substantially. Activity is dramatically increased when theamino group is contained in the aliphatic carbon chain. For example, alendronate, anaminobisphosphonate, is approximately 700-fold more potent than etidronate, both invitro and in vivo. In general, bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed from thegastrointestinal tract as a result of their poor lipophilicity. In vitro and in vivo studieshave shown that bisphosphonates are absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract
  2. 2. via paracellular transport. Systemically available bisphosphonates disappear very rapidlyfrom plasma, and are partly taken up by the bone and partly excreted by the kidney. Therelative contribution of these two processes to overall plasma elimination differssignificantly among bisphosphonates. To date, all bisphosphonates studied show noevidence of metabolism. Renal excretion is the only route of elimination. Studies withalendronate in rats indicate that the drug is actively secreted by an uncharacterized renaltransport system, and not by the anionic or cationic renal transport systems.Bisphosphonates bind preferentially to bones which have high turnover rates, and theirdistribution in bone is not homogeneous. After bone uptake, the bisphosphonates areliberated again only when the bone in which they are deposited is resorbed. Thus, thehalf-life of bisphosphonates in bone is very long, ranging among different species from 1to 10 years, depending largely on the rate of bone turnover.(Bone 18:75-85; 1996 Bisphosphonates cause inhibition of osteoclasts (and in some cases apoptosis). This celldeath causes a loss of the growth factors for bone vascularization and a reduction of thefactors that stimulate osteoblasts to add new bone. Other mechanisms could be involvedas well and continued research is needed. DEFINITIONSOsteoporosis: a disease in which the bone loses density and become so porous that it canbreak as a result of even minor trauma.Osteonecrosis: (pronounced OSS-tee-oh-ne-KRO-sis) a disease in which a temporary orpermanent loss of blood supplies to the bone causes bone tissue to die and the bone tocollapse. This condition is also known as avascular necrosis, aseptic necrosis andischemic necrosis. Osteonecrosis can happen to any bone but most commonly affects the ends(epiphysis) of the femur, the bone extending from the knee joint to the hip joint. Othercommon sites include the upper arm, these, shoulders and ankles. The disease may affectjust one bone, more than one bone at the same time, or more than one bone at differenttimes. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons reports that 10,000 to 20,000people develop osteonecrosis every year. The report states that most of those affected arebetween the ages of 20 and 50. This report did not differentiate between male andfemale. The amount of disability that results from osteonecrosis depends on what part ofthe bone is affected, how large an area is involved and how the bone rebuilds itself.Normally, bone continuously breaks down and rebuilds. Old bone is replaced with newbone. This process, which takes place after an injury as well as during normal growth,keeps the skeleton strong and helps to maintain a balance of minerals. In the course ofosteonecrosis, however, the healing process is usually ineffective and the bone tissuesbreak down faster than the body can repair them. If left untreated, the disease progresses,the bone collapses and the surface breaks down leading to pain and in joints arthritis.
  3. 3. Osteonecrosis is caused by impaired blood supply to the bone, but it is not alwaysclear what causes this impairment. Osteonecrosis often occurs in people with certain riskfactors and medical conditions. However it also affects people with no health problemsand for no known reasons.Osteoclasts: a large cell with many nuclei, found in growing bone. It assimilates bonytissue and is active in the formation of canals and cavities.Osteoblasts: a cell from which bone develops.Apoptosis: a form of cell death necessary to make way for new cells and to remove cellswhose DNA has been damaged to the point at which cancerous change is liable to occur. POTENTIAL CAUSESSteroid Medications: aside from injury, one of the most common causes of osteonecrosisprocess is the use of corticosteroid medications, such as prednisone. Corticosteroids arecommonly used to treat inflammatory diseases. Studies suggest that long-term use of oralor intravenous (IV) corticosteroids is associated with nontraumatic osteonecrosis. It hasnot been made clear why corticosteroids sometimes leads to osteonecrosis. There hasbeen speculation that the drugs may interfere with the bodys ability to break down fattysubstances called lipids. The lipids then build up in and clog of blood vessels, causingthem to narrow and reduce the amount of blood that gets to the bone.Alcohol Use: excessive alcohol use is another common cause of osteonecrosis. Peoplewho drink alcohol in excess can develop fatty substances that may block blood vessels,causing a decreased blood supply to the bones.Injury: when a fracture, a dislocation, or some other joint injury occurs, the blood vesselsmay be damaged. This can interfere with the blood circulation to the bone and lead totrauma-related osteonecrosis.Other Risk Factors: other risk factors for osteonecrosis include radiation therapy,chemotherapy and organ transplantation. Osteonecrosis is also associated with a numberof medical conditions, including cancer. THOSE LIKELY TO DEVELOP OSTEONECROSISOsteonecrosis affects both men and women. It can occur in people of any age, fromchildren to the elderly. However it is most common in people in their thirties, forties andover 50. With the use of bisphosphonates in women over 50, for the prevention ofosteoporosis, this appears to be the most common sex and age. Certainly, use ofbisphosphonates is the common factor. Whether or not the likelihood is influenced bythe type of bisphosphonate, how it is administered and/or the duration of treatment is notknown yet. It does appear that the condition was much more likely in those patients who
  4. 4. had been having bisphosphonate treatment for 3 to 4 years than it was in patients who’dhad treatment for less than a year. In fact, no one got ONJ if they had had fewer than 13treatments with BP. It could be concluded from this that while dental treatment is a riskfactor, the most important risk factor is the length of time you’ve had BP treatment. ONJwas not associated with treatment for any one particular type of cancer.Although there has been an increase in osteonecrosis of the jaw in people takingbisphosphonates, this is still only a very small percentage of people overall. Anecdotalcases and roughly 875 reports that one of the IV drugs maker had received by February,2005 from among millions of users point to a small risk among users. Fewer than 7 outof 100 people were found to be affected in a November 2005 study. While this numbermay appear as small, it is still significant. It should be noted that 90 to 95 percent of the875 cases have been in cancer patients taking the IV versions, stated Dr. John Hellstein,clinical professor of oral and maxillofacial pathology at the University of Iowa.But Dr. Robert Recker, director of Creighton Universitys Osteoporosis Research Center,said he isnt convinced that theres a risk associated with the osteoporosis drugs.Recker has treated several thousand patients with oral bisphosphonates in clinical trialsand in practice. He also has seen clinical trial data on the drugs as a member of scientificadvisory boards for Merck and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, the respective makersof Fosamax and Actonel."I dont think theres any significant risk in patients who have osteoporosis," he said. "Therisk is in patients who are taking giant doses for cancer."It should be emphasized that this statement should be looked at carefully since Dr.Recker is a member of scientific advisory boards for Merck and Procter & GamblePharmaceuticals. SYMPTOMSIn the early stages of osteonecrosis, people may not have any symptoms. As the diseaseprogresses, however, most experience pain. Pain usually develops gradually, but may bemild or severe. If osteonecrosis progresses and the bone surface collapses, pain maydevelop or increase dramatically. The period of time between the first symptoms may bedifferent for each person, but it typically ranges from several months to more than a year.Sometimes a patient may start to experience swelling and numbness or a "heavy jawfeeling". There may even be a loosening of teeth, as in periodontal disease. There can bebone necrosis or loss of bone which causes this. There can be sharp edges of exposedbone, bone spurs or the breaking loose of small bone spicules around tooth sockets. DIAGNOSIS
  5. 5. After performing a complete physical examination and asking about the patients medicalhistory, the use of one or more bone imaging techniques can help to diagnoseosteonecrosis. As with many other diseases, early diagnosis increases the chances oftreatment success.X-ray: a radiograph is probably one of the first tests that would be recommended.However x-rays are not sensitive enough to detect bone changes in the early stages of thedisease. If the x-ray is normal, more tests may be ordered. In later stages ofosteonecrosis, x-rays may very well show bone damage, and once the diagnosis is made,they ordered often used to monitor disease progression.Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): this is probably the most sensitive method fordiagnosing osteonecrosis in the early stages. Unlike x-rays, bone scans, and CT(computed/computerized tomography) scans, MRI detects chemical changes in the bonemarrow. MRI provides a picture of the affected area and the bone rebuilding process. Inaddition, MRI may show deceased areas that are not yet causing any symptoms. Therehave been some cautions against aggressive treatment of osteonecrosis that has beendetected by MRI. but is not causing symptoms. One study has shown evidence that for aselect group of patients in early stages of osteonecrosis, the disease may improvespontaneously.Computed/Computerized Tomography (CT scan): this type of test is an imagingtechnique that provides a three-dimensional picture of the bone. It also shows "slices" ofthe bone, making the picture much clearer than x-rays and bone scans. There has beendisagreement about the usefulness of this test to diagnose osteonecrosis.Bone scan: this test is not normally used for diagnosing osteonecrosis.Biopsy: a surgical procedure in which tissue sample from the affected bone is removedand studied. Although a biopsy can conclusively diagnose osteonecrosis, it is rarely usedbecause it requires surgery.Functional Evaluation of Bone: a test to measure the pressure inside the bone may beused when there is a strong suspicion of osteonecrosis, despite normal results of x-rays,bone scans and MRIs. These tests are very sensitive for detecting increase pressurewithin the bone, but they do require surgery. TREATMENTS FOR ONJAppropriate treatment for osteonecrosis is necessary. Without treatment, most peoplewith the disease will experience severe pain and limitations within two years.Consultation with an oral surgeon/maxillofacial surgeon or dental oncologist familiarwith osteonecrosis is recommended. It may be difficult to find someone who hasdiagnosed and treated this problem. To determine the most appropriate treatment thefollowing is considered:
  6. 6. 1. Age 2. Stage of the disease 3. Location and extent of affected area 4. Underlying causeNonsurgical Treatments: may used by itself or in combination with other types oftreatment. Usually these treatments may relieve pain or help in the short term, but formost people they dont bring lasting improvement. 1. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often prescribed to reduce pain. People with clotting disorders may be given blood thinners to reduce clots that block the blood supply to the bone. Cholesterol reducing medications may be used to reduce fatty substances (lipids) that increase with corticosteroid treatment, which is a major risk factor for osteonecrosis. There have been limited studies that people who took cholesterol lowering medications called statins along with corticosteroids significantly reduce the risk of developing ONJ, in the first place. 2. Electrical stimulation has been used in several centers to induce bone growth, and in some cases has been helpful when used prior to certain types of osteonecrosis. There is no place in the literature that shows this has been used for ONJ. 3. Antibiotic or antimicrobial treatments are used to eliminate or reduce the possibility of infection. Specific drugs should be selected based upon the type of bacterial infection found. 4. Stopping the bisphosphonate therapy, when possible. This is not a proven part of treatment due to the long half-life of bisphosphonates.Surgical Treatment: there are a number of different surgical procedures used to treatosteonecrosis. Most people with osteonecrosis will eventually need surgery. It has beenstrongly recommended that if surgery is used, bisphosphonates therapy should beinterrupted. There is some data to suggest that cessation of taking bisphosphonates for2-4 months is necessary to facilitate recovery. 1. Core decompression removes the inner cylinder of bone, which reduces pressure within the bone. This causes and increase blood flow and allows more blood vessels to form. This works best in people who were in the earliest stages of osteonecrosis. This procedure sometimes reduces pain and slows the progression. 2. Osteotomy involves shaping the bone to reduce stress on the affected area. Recovery can be lengthy process, requiring 3 to 12 months of very limited activities. This procedure is most effective for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis and those with a small area of affected bone.
  7. 7. 4. Bone graft is a transplantation of healthy bone from another part of the body. There were no reports in the literature that this is used in treating ONJ.Miscellaneous Treatment: Hyperbaric oxygen does not seem to be helpful. Dentalimplants and any elective oral surgery should be avoided. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS/REPORTSIn a letter to the editor, by Dr. Robert Marx, to the Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery,in 2003, it was stated that he was seeing more patients with ONJ. All of the patients hadbeen taking Aredia or Zometa. 18 out of 36 of these patients had multiple myeloma. Heand others stated that there was a risk of very poor healing of the jaw after dental surgery.The most important finding was that there was an apparent occurrence of jawosteonecrosis in patients taking bisphosphonates.There are 2 reports from the New York area by Dr. Ruggiero and colleagues. Theyreported 63 total patients, 28 with myeloma over a 3-year span (2001-2003) inclusive. Agroup at Memorial Sloan Kettering noted 4 myeloma patients with osteonecrosis in theirreview of bisphosphonate patients.In a personal communication with Lewis W. Williams, D.D.S., M.S., a maxillofacialsurgeon in Honolulu, he states that in the past years he and his partners have seen sixpatients with Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. All of them were on women over 50 years of age,taking Fosamax. He states that he has heard of other cases by other dentists.Many patients who had ONJ were also receiving corticosteroids and chemotherapy.More research needs to be done to determine the role of other drugs and treatmentmodalities during treatment with the bisphosphonates and the occurrence of ONJ.There does not seem to be any treatment that definitely cures Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.While some are successful, the literature shows that even with continued treatment, notall patients have a total remission. No data is available to suggest whether thediscontinuation of BPs reduces the risk of ONJ prior to dental surgery. Potentbisphosphonates bind to bone for many months, probably 1 to 10 years. PREVENTION OF ONJ (CONSLUSION)There have been some reports that root canal treatments should be avoided. Others havestated that they should be done, as well as crowns and other dental restorations. Thesetreatments, according to some, help to preserve the teeth and eliminate oral surgery.Have all necessary dental treatment finished prior to starting bisphosphonates.Dental health during cancer treatment. (Any repetitions in the following are made foremphasis and importance to prevent ONJ)
  8. 8. Cancer treatments can affect your entire body, including your teeth and gums. Sideeffects of treatment may include inflammation of the mucous membranes in the mouth(mucositis), infections, taste changes, dry mouth, pain, tooth decay, gum disease, andsores inside your mouth. Therefore, good dental health practices are especially importantfor people living with cancer. Good communication is important, too. Your dentist shouldknow that you are being treated for cancer, and your oncologist should be aware of yourdental history. As a patient living with cancer, you should: • Schedule a dental exam and cleaning before cancer treatment begins andperiodically during the course of your treatment. • Discuss dental procedures, such as the pulling of teeth or insertion of dentalimplants, with your oncologist before you start your cancer treatment. • Have your dentist check and adjust removable dentures, if you have them • Tell your physician about any bleeding of the gums, pain, or unusual feeling inyour teeth or gums, or any dental infections.Regular dental hygiene is not that different for people with cancer than it is for peoplewho don’t have cancer, but because cancer treatments can affect the teeth and gums, itcan be evenmore important.If you have cancer, your routine dental hygiene should include: • Brushing your teeth and tongue after every meal and at bedtime, using a softtoothbrush and gentle strokes. • Gentle flossing at least once a day to remove plaque (if your gums bleed or hurt,the area that is sore should be avoided, but the other teeth still should be flossed) • Keeping your mouth moist by rinsing often with water (many medicines cause“dry mouth,” which can lead to decay and other dental problems) • Avoiding use of mouthwash that contains alcohol.Use a mirror to check your teeth and gums daily for any changes, such as sores orbleeding gums. If you notice a problem or a change, or experience pain in your mouth,teeth, or jaws, report it toyour dentist or oncologist immediately.The scope of this problem and the impact upon current bisphosphonate use in cancertreatment remains to be assessed. With appropriate awareness and early managementserious problems from ONJ, as well as osteonecrosis in general, can be minimized. Newdrugs are always being tested and maybe a drug will be found to replacebisphosphonates.I hope this information has helped in understanding the current situation of ONJ andbisphosphonates. Many of the conclusions or material presented is my own interpretationor conclusion. Any mistakes in the information provided were inadvertent. Anyinformation that might cause a change in treatment should be discussed with yourphysician or dentist prior to making such changes.
  9. 9. Thanks to Dr. Paul M. Lambert for the use of his extremely educational and informativePowerPoint presentation. You can view this presentation by putting your cursor over thelink and follow the directions. Because of the size of this presentation, it may take a fewminuets to load, even with a high speed connection. Turn on your sound to listen while itis viewed. I promise you, it is worth the wait.PPT] Immediate Reconstruction of Mandibular DefectsNone of this information should be construed as medical/dental advice, justrecommendations.Laurence C. Reichel, D.D.S. Copyright © 2006. All rights reserved. SUGGESTED FORMThe following form can be used for both your physician and dentist and is notcopyrighted.Consultation FormDentist’s Name: ______________________ Phone No:___________Oncologist’s/Physician’s Name: ___________________ Phone No:___________About My Cancer TreatmentDiagnosis (Disease & Stage): __________________________________________________________________________________________Date of Diagnosis: _________________________Past and Planned Treatments (Date): _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________❑ Surgery (Site:___________________________________________)❑ Radiation Therapy (Site:_________________________________)❑ ChemotherapyDrugs:❑ Immunotherapy or Other Biological Therapy(Treatments:____________________________________________)❑ Steroids ❑ Bisphosphonates❑ Other Cancer Treatments (Please List)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________About My Dental ProceduresDate of Last Complete Dental Exam: _________________________Current and Planned Treatments (Date):
  10. 10. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________❑ Wisdom Teeth Extraction or Other Dental Surgery❑ Periodontics or Other Gum Surgery❑ Braces or Other Orthodontics❑ Root Canal Therapy ❑ Sealants❑ Dental Implants ❑ Fillings❑ Dentures ❑ Bridges❑ Caps, Bonding, Veneers ❑ Tooth Contouring or Shaping❑ Crowns ❑ Bleaching❑ Other Dental Procedures (Please List)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCES1. For the dental patient: oral care for cancer patients. Am Dent Assoc. 2002 133(7):1014.2. National Cancer Institute. Oral complications of chemotherapy and head/neck radiation(PDQ). 2004. 3. Durie BG. Aredia/Zometa and osteonecrosis of the jaws. International MyelomaFoundation. 20044. Marx RE (2003) Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascularnecrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 61:1115-1117.5. Migliorati CA (2003) Bisphosphonates and oral cavity avascular bone necrosis. J ClinOncol; 21:4253-4254.6. Ruggiero SL, Mehrotra B, Rosenberg TJ, et al (2004) Osteonecrosis of the jawsassociated with the use of bisphosphonates: a review of 63 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg;62:527-534.7. Assouline-Dayan Y, Chang C, Greenspan A, et al: Pathogenesis and natural history ofosteonecrosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 32:94-124, 20028. Assael L: New foundations in understanding osteonecrosis of the jaws. J OralMaxillofac Surg 62:125-126, 20049. Schwartz HC: Osteonecrosis of the jaws: A complication of cancer chemotherapy.Head Neck Surg 4:251-253, 198210. Sung EC, Chan SM, Sakurai K, et al: Osteonecrosis of the maxilla as a complicationto chemotherapy: A case report. Spec Care Dentist 22:142-146, 200211. Tarassoff P, Csermak K: Avascular necrosis of the jaws: Risk factors in metastaticcancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1238-1239, 200312. Glueck CJ, Freiberg R, Gruppo R, et al: Thrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis:Pathogenetic etiologies of osteonecrosis. J Invest Med 45:243A, 1997 (abstr)13. Wannfors K: Vascular changes after experimentally-induced inflammation in themandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 18:79-82, 1989
  11. 11. 14. Jones LC, Mont MA, Le TB, et al: Procoagulants and osteonecrosis. JRheumatol30:783, 200315. Glueck CJ, Freiberg R, Gruppo R, et al: Thrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis:Reversible pathogenetic etiologies of osteonecrosis, in Urbaniak RJ, Jones JP(eds): Osteonecrosis: Etiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Rosemont, IL, AmericanAcademy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1997, pp 105-11016. Glueck CJ, Freiberg R, Glueck HI, et al: Hypofibrinolysis: A common, major causeof osteonecrosis. Am J Hematol 45:156-166, 199417. Sano T: Recent developments in understanding temporomandibular joint disorders—Part 1: Bone marrow abnormalities of the mandibular condyle. DentomaxillofacRadiol 29:7-10, 200018. Wannfors K, Gazelius B: Blood flow in jaw bones affected by chronic osteomyelitis.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:147-153, 199119. Gebhard KL, Maibach HI: Relationship between systemic corticosteroids andosteonecrosis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2:377-388, 200120. Drescher W, Weigert WP, Bunger MH, et al: Femoral head blood flow reduction andhypercoagulability under 24 h megadose steroid treatment in pigs. J Orthop Res22:501-508, 2004. JANUARY 2006 • 1321. Bagan JV, Murillo J, Jimenez Y, et al: Avascular jaw osteonecrosis in associationwith cancer chemotherapy: Series of 10 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 34:120-123, 200522. Wang J, Goodger NM, Pogrel MA: Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with cancerchemotherapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1104-1107, 200323. Mattano LA Jr, Sather HN, Trigg ME, et al: Osteonecrosis as a complication oftreating acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: A report from the Children’s CancerGroup. J Clin Oncol 18:3262-3272, 200023 Arico M, Boccalatte MFP, Silvestri D, et al: Osteonecrosis: An emergingcomplication of intensive chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica 88:747-753, 200324. Winquist EW, Bauman GS, Balogh J: Nontraumatic osteonecrosis afterchemotherapy for testicular cancer: A systematic review. Am J Clin Oncol 24:603-606,200125. Glueck CJ, Freiberg R, Tracy T, et al: Thrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis:Pathophysiologies of osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 334: 43-56, 199726. Schwartz O, Pindborg JJ, Svenningsen A: Tooth exfoliation and necrosis of thealveolar bone following trigeminal herpes zoster in HIV-infected patient.Tandlaegebladet93:623-627, 198927. Shroyer JV III, Lew D, Abreo F, et al: Osteomyelitis of the mandible as a result ofsickle cell disease: Report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol72:25-28, 199128. Pogrel MA, Miller CE: A case of maxillary necrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg61:489-493, 200329. Mintz SM, Anavi Y: Maxillary osteomyelitis and spontaneous tooth exfoliation afterherpes zoster. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:664-666, 199230. Arikawa J, Mizushima J, Higaki Y, et al: Mandibular alveolar bone necrosis aftertrigeminal herpes zoster. Int J Dermatol 43:136-137, 2004
  12. 12. 31. Bras J, de Jonge HK, van Merkesteyn JP: Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible:Pathogenesis. Am J Otolaryngol 11:244-250, 199032. Reuther T, Schuster T, Mende U, et al: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws as a side effectof radiotherapy of head and neck tumor patients: A report of a thirty year retrospectivereview. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:289-295, 200333. Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R: Radiotherapy-induced mandibular bonecomplications. Cancer Treat Rev 28:65-74, 200234. Studer G, Gratz KW, Glanzmann C: Osteoradionecrosis of the mandibula in patientstreated with different fractionations. Strahlenther Onkol 180:233-240, 200435. Sulaiman F, Huryn JM, Zlotolow IM: Dental extractions in the irradiated head andneck patient: A retrospective analysis of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centerprotocols, criteria, and end results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1123-1131,200336. Ruggiero SL, Mehrotra B, Rosenberg TJ, et al: Osteonecrosis of the jaws associatedwith the use of bisphosphonates: A review of 63 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg62:527-534, 200437. Marx RE: Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosisof the jaws: A growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1115-1117, 200338. Glueck CJ, McMahon RE, Bouquot JE, et al: Heterozygosity for the Leiden mutationof the factor V gene, a common pathoetiology for osteonecrosis of the jaw, withthrombophilia augmented by exogenous estrogens. J Lab Clin Med 130:540-543, 199739. Kavadia-Tsatala S, Kolokytha O, Kaklamanos EG, et al: Mandibular lesions ofvasoocclusive origin in sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Odontology 92:68-72, 2004 35.Glueck CJ, McMahon RE, Bouquot JE, et al: A preliminary pilot study of treatment ofthrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis and amelioration of the pain of osteonecrosis of thejaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:64-73, 199840. Migliorati CA: Bisphosphanates and oral cavity avascular bone necrosis. J Clin Oncol21:4253-4254, 200341. Estilo CL, Van Poznak CH, Williams T, et al: Osteonecrosis of the maxilla andmandible in patients treated with bisphosphonates: A retrospective study. J Clin Oncol23:750s, 2004 (suppl; abstr 8088)42. Durie BGM, Katz M, McCoy J, et al: Osteonecrosis of the jaws in myeloma: Timedependent correlation with Aredia and Zometa use. Blood 104:216a, 2004 (abstr 756)43. Thakkar SG, Isada C, Englund K, et al: Bisphosphonate therapy associated with anincreased incidence of mandibular/maxillary osteomyelitis in multiple myeloma patients.Blood 104:313b, 2004 (abstr)44. Schuster MW, Dymek JM: Oral cavity avascular bone necrosis: A newly recognizedcomplication of intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate therapy in cancer patients. Blood104:308b, 2004 (abstr)45. Kut V, Mehta J, Tariman J, et al: Osteonecrosis of the jaw in myeloma patientsreceiving pamidronate or zoledronate. Blood 104:315b, 2004 (abstr)46. Van Poznak CH, Estilo CL, Sauter MP, et al: Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patientswith metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:S131-S132, 2004 (suppl 1;abstr)47. Carter G, Goss AN, Doecke C: Bisphosphonates and avascular necrosis ofthe jaw: A possible association. Med J Aust 182:413-415, 2005
  13. 13. 48. Melo MD, Obeid G: Osteonecrosis of the maxilla in a patient with a history ofbisphosphonate therapy. J Can Dent Assoc 71:111-113, 200549. Purcell PM, Boyd IW: Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Med J Aust182:417-418, 200550. Hultborn R, Gundersen S, Ryden S, et al: Efficacy of pamidronate in breast cancerwith bone metastases: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study.Anticancer Res 19:3383-3392, 199950. Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, et al: Pamidronate prevents skeletalcomplications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma andosteolytic bone metastases: Long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlledtrials. Cancer 88:1082-1090, 200051. Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, et al: Long-term pamidronate treatment ofadvanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. J Clin Oncol 16:593-602,199852. Major P, Lortholary A, Hon J, et al: Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in thetreatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: A pooled analysis of two randomized,controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 19:558-567, 200151. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, et al: Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronicacid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications inpatients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 98:1735-1744, 200352. Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, et al: Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for theprevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormonerefractoryprostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:879-882, 200453. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS, et al: Long-term efficacy and safetyof zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmallcell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: A randomized, phase III, double-blind,placebo-controlled trial. Cancer 100:2613-2621, 200454. Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Berenson JR, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncologyguideline on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:1378-1391,200055. Berenson JR, Hillner BE, Kyle RA, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncologyclinical practice guidelines: The role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. J ClinOncol 20:3719-3736, 200256. Kyle RA: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: Natural history in241 cases. Am J Med 64:814-826, 197857. International Myeloma Foundation: Myeloma minute: 14 JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE• VOL. 2, ISSUE 158. J. H. LIN: Drug Metabolism I, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA59. Paul M. Lambert, D.D.S.: Personal communication ADDENDUMThe following is the newest information received.
  14. 14. My thanks to Lewis Williams, D.D.S., M.S. (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., Inc.,Honolulu, HI), for forwarding the following information to me.The newest nomenclature in the literature for Osteonecrosis of the Jaw isBisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis (BON).The material was taken from an article in the Journal of the American DentalAssociation: Managing the care of patients with bisphosphonate-associatedosteonecrosis, An American Academy of Oral Medicine position.The most important item reported in this article was the statement that therecommendations are based on expert opinion because at this time, there are no availablerandomized controlled trials that support any effect on patient management andoutcomes.The oral lesions associated with bisphosphonates are similar in appearance to those ofradiation-induced osteonecrosis. Clinically, they appear as ragged oral mucosalulcerations that expose underlying bone and often are extremely painful. The lesions arepersistent and do not respond to conventional treatment modalities such as debridement,antibiotic therapy or hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The presence of these lesionscomplicates the oncological, nutritional and oral management of affected patients.Bisphosphonates clear rapidly from the circulation, bind to bone mineral and concentrateselectively in bone. If not incorporated into the bone’s mineral matrix, bisphosphonateare eliminated in urine.This article stated that bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic activity.During bone resorption, bisphosphonates are released from the bone and may be eitherincorporated into newly formed bone or phagocytized by osteoclasts. The latter processresults in loss of the osteoclasts ability to resorb bone and promote apoptosis orprogrammed cell death. Osteoblast-induced osteoclastic bone resorption is anotherimportant action that may be affected by bisphosphonates. Therefore, physiological bonedeposition and remodeling are severely compromised in patients receivingbisphosphonate therapy. There is thought that bisphosphonates have antiangiogenicproperties and may be directly tumoricidal, making them and important agent in cancertherapy.In laymen’s terms this means that bisphosphonates are inhibitors of osteoclasts, the cellsthat remove bone. Bisphosphonates are released from the bone and then may either beincorporated into newly formed bone or are destroyed by the osteoclasts. This latterprocess results in the loss of the osteoclasts ability to resorb bone and promote cell death.At the same time osteoblasts, those cells that make new bone, may be affected bybisphosphonates. This shows us that the normal bone deposition and remodeling areseverely compromised in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy. The last statementin the paragraph above, is where I have drawn some of my conclusions regarding bloodsupply loss. It states that bisphosphonates might have properties that decreases the blood
  15. 15. supply. With a decrease in blood supply it could be assumed that the tumor would nowdie, making bisphosphonates an important agent in cancer therapy. This is a dichotomywhen we talk about treatment therapy for the prevention of osteonecrosis of the jaw. RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH BISPHOSPHONATE-ASSOCIATED OSTEONECROSISExtent of risk factor, systemic: Intravenous use of bisphosphonates; multiple myeloma;cancer metastatic to bone such as breast, lung and prostate.Extent of risk factor, local: Dental extractions; surgical bone manipulation; trauma fromdentures: presence of oral infection; poor oral health. (While these possibly participate inthe process, the mechanisms by which they might do so have not yet been completelyidentified).The most common clinical history associated with the process of osteonecrosis of the jawor (BON) is absent or delayed hardened tissue and soft tissue healing after dentalextractions.Conclusion: prevention of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis is the best approachto management of this complication. This involves having excellent oral health prior tousing BPs. Existing protocols to manage the care of patients who will receive radiationtherapy or chemotherapy may be used until specific guidelines for BON are developed. Cesar Migliorati, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.;Jeffrey Casiglia, D.M.D.; Joes Epstein,D.M.D., M.S.D., F.R.C.D. (C.); Peter L. Jacobsen, Ph.D., Sook-Bin Woo, D.M.D.JADA, Vol. 136, December 2005, p. 1658.The following information was submitted by Ludwick Papaurelis.Oral bisphosphonates fail to prevent bone loss from androgen deprivationtherapy in men with prostate cancer. 2006 ASCO Annual MeetingAbstract No: 14643Citation: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting ProceedingsPart I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 14643Author(s): R. Y. Lam, M. Scholz, B. Guess, T. TrillingAbstract: Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a widelyadministered treatment for prostate cancer. However, ADT is associated withaccelerated bone loss, osteoporosis, and fractures (Shahinian, NEJM 2005;352:154). According to Smith et al, annual bone loss on ADT approaches 9%(Smith, NEJM 2001;345:948), using QCT densitometry, a highly sensitive testfor the detection of osteoporosis in men. Intravenous bisphosphonates(pamidronate, zolendronate) have been shown to prevent ADT-related bone lossin randomized phase III trials. We performed a retrospective analysis to
  16. 16. determine if oral bisphosphonates effectively prevent bone loss in menreceiving ADT.Methods: Twenty two men, ages 60-80, were placed on alendronate orrisendronate at the initiation of ADT. Baseline and follow-up bone mineraldensitometry (BMD) studies were performed with QCT densitometry. Repeat BMDwas performed 12- 27 months (mean = 17mo) after the baseline BMD. Percentagechange in bone density was annualized. Within each treatment group, thehypothesis of no mean change from baseline was analyzed using a paired ttest.Results: Mean baseline bone density was 122.6mg/cc. Mean follow-up bonedensity was 112.7mg/cc. For the whole group, the annualized mean change inBMD was negative 7.77%/yr (p = 0.0003). Of note, 9/22 men maintained orgained bone density (-1.26% to +5.95%). 13/22 men lost at least 6.03%(-6.03% to -23.2%). There was no unexpected toxicity or fractures.Conclusions: In this retrospective study, prophylactic oral bisphosphonatesdo not protect against accelerated ADT-induced bone loss in men withprostate cancer.This shows the apparent lack of real good scientific evidence for some of thetreatment that is being prescribed. 22 patients does not mean the data is valid orinvalid. It is a place to start new thinking, but not to throw out all of the oldthoughts.Again we go back to how should treatment be prescribed by the physicians andaccepted by the patients. In regards to Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, I do not believethere is a basis from which one can make an absolute decision. Physicians andpatients will have to use their best judgments in light of the scientific data. Inlaymen’s terms, we just don’t know!All of this article may be reprinted without my specific knowledge as long as there isno financial gain to the individual(s).Laurence C. Reichel, D.D.S. Copyright © 2006. All rights reserved.