<ul><li>Don’t all scientists believe in Evolution? </li></ul><ul><li>Separation of church and state? </li></ul><ul><li>Sta...
<ul><li>Was there death before sin? </li></ul><ul><li>Days before the sun? </li></ul><ul><li>Mr . Flat </li></ul><ul><li>R...
EVANGELISM O   DE CIENCIA CREACIONISTA Seminario Parte 7a :  Las Preguntas y Las Contestas   Lecci ó n 1 4   de  1 5 . Un ...
I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to  seek out wisdom,  and the reason of things,  Eclesiastés 7:25 Yo he r...
But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and  be ready always to give an answer  to every man that asketh you a reason of...
Study  to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,  rightly dividing the word of truth.  ...
Don’t all scientists believe in evolution?
1. All scientists  do not  believe in evolution. 2. Even if they did that is  not  how truth is established. 3. History ha...
Geocentric vs Heliocentric The “majority”  of scientists taught that the sun circles the earth,  Majority opinion proves n...
Weights falling from Pisa Tower The “majority”  of scientists taught that that heavy objects fall faster.  Majority opinio...
In 1799 George Washington was bled twice by his doctors  before he died. They believed  in the doctrine of humors. Wrong! 21
Many of the people therefore, when they heard this saying, said, Of a truth this is the Prophet.  Others said, This is the...
Juan 7: 40-42 Algunos empero decían:  ¿De Galilea ha de venir el Cristo?   ¿No ha dicho la escritura:  Que de la simiente ...
So there was a division among the people because of him. And  some of them would have taken him;  but no man laid hands on...
Then came the officers to the chief priests and Pharisees; and they said unto them,  Why have ye not brought him?  The off...
Then answered them the Pharisees, Are ye also deceived? [Are you stupid?]  Have any of the rulers or of the Pharisees beli...
“ But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed.” Mas esta gente común que no sabe la ley, malditos son. Hovind trans...
Nicodemus saith unto them, …  Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him,  and know what he doeth?  They answered and ...
Since  the Pharisees had not believed  on him that was used as  “proof”  He was not right.-  “ Has he published in major s...
The “majority” voted not to go in  to the promised land.  Numbers 32. The “majority” followed false gods  many times in th...
The “majority”  of the world hates Christians. The “majority”  of religious leaders hated Jesus.
Also, many thousands of scientists do believe in Creation.  See: ICR.ORG. Often they are afraid to be very vocal about it ...
Roger DeHart, science teacher at Burlington-Edison high school near Seattle, WA was told  he could not inform students  of...
Kevin Haley, (541-382-2278) biology teacher at Central Oregon Community College, Bend, Oregon  lost his job for exposing e...
Baylor University in Waco, TX fired William Dembski in April 2000 because he advocated “intelligent design”.  News Herald ...
Forrest Mims was a science writer for 20 years.  He published in National Geographic, Science Digest, The American Journal...
8-15-2000 Rod LaVake-Faribault, MN *
Teacher Dan Clark was told by Lafayette, Indiana school superintendent Ed Eller not to introduce creationism to his class,...
Indianapolis Star, Sept. 23, 2001
 
Dean Kenyon, co-author of this book, taught biology at San Francisco State University.  He wrote books about evolution.  I...
This is the third  criteria  for receiving a letter of recommendation from  Dr. Dini  to pursue a career in medicine. Crit...
species. How can someone who does not accept the most important theory in biology expect to properly practice in a field t...
regarding the method of science, for good scientists would never throw out data that do not conform to their expectations ...
The students at Texas Tech offered Mr. Dini $1,000 if he would debate me when I spoke in Lubbock, TX in Feb. 2003.   He re...
Thursday, January 30, 2003 DALLAS — A biology professor who refuses to write letters of recommendation for his students if...
PURCELLVILLE -- Patrick Henry College was notified on November 13 that it had received initial accreditation by the  Ameri...
Professor Dumped Over Evolution Beliefs By Ed Vitagliano  March 11, 2003 (AgapePress) -  A university professor said she w...
Francis  Bacon  (1561–1626) Scientific method Johann  Kepler  (1571–1630) Scientific astronomy Athanasius Kircher (1601–16...
Isaac  Newton  (1642–1727) Dynamics; Calculus; Gravitation law; Reflecting telescope (wrote more about the Bible than scie...
William Whiston (1667–1752) Physics, Geology John Hutchinson (1674–1737) Paleontology Johathan Edwards (1703–1758) Physics...
John Dalton (1766–1844)  Atomic theory; Gas law, Father of the Modern Atomic Theory; Chemistry Timothy Dwight (1752–1817) ...
John Kidd (1775–1851) Chemistry Humphrey Davy (1778–1829) Thermokinetics; Safety lamp  Benjamin Silliman (1779–1864) Miner...
William Prout (1785–1850) Food chemistry (probably believed in an old-earth) Adam Sedgwick (1785–1873) Geology (old-earth ...
William Whewell (1794–1866) Anemometer (old-earth compromiser) Joseph Henry (1797–1878) Electric motor; Galvanometer Richa...
James Glaisher (1809–1903) Meteorology Philip H. Gosse (1810–1888) Ornithologist; Zoology Sir Henry Rawlinson (1810–1895) ...
George Stokes (1819–1903) Fluid Mechanics John William Dawson (1820–1899) Geology Rudolph Virchow (1821–1902) Pathology Gr...
Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866) Non-Euclidean geometries Joseph  Lister  (1827–1912) Antiseptic surgery Balfour Stewart (1828...
Alexander MacAlister (1844–1919) Anatomy A. H. Sayce (1845–1933) Archeologist George Romanes (1848–1894) Biology; Physiolo...
Paul Lemoine (1878–1940) Geology Dr Frank Marsh, Biology Edward H. Maunder (1851–1928) Astronomy William Mitchell  Ramsay ...
Some ill informed scoffers teach that  all scientists believe in evolution.   This is simply not true. There are many thou...
“ Evolution is unproved and unprovable.  We believe it  only because  the only alternative is special creation, and that i...
“ Evolution is not a fact.  Evolution doesn’t even qualify as a theory or as a hypothesis.  It is a metaphysical research ...
“ I suppose the reason was why we leapt at the Origin of species was that  the idea of God interfered with our sexual moré...
Evolution is  promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology,  a secular...
“ Evolution is a  fairy tale for grownups.  The theory has helped nothing in the progress of science.  It is useless.”   P...
<ul><li>Nearly all branches of science were started by creationists. </li></ul><ul><li>Evolution theory has added nothing ...
What about separation of church and state? Can creation or the Bible be discussed in public schools?
Thomas Jefferson used it in a letter to  Messrs. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, and Stephen S. Nelson, a Committee of th...
“ The First Amendment has erected a wall of  separation between church and state.” Thomas Jefferson That wall is a one dim...
Paul Lemoine (1878–1940) Geology Dr Frank Marsh, Biology Edward H. Maunder (1851–1928) Astronomy William Mitchell  Ramsay ...
¿ C òmo podemos ver las estrellas que estàn billones de años luz de distancia si el universo solo tiene  6,000  años ? How...
h
Thou, even thou, art LORD alone;  thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens,  with all their host, the earth, and all t...
Super Nova Astrònomos han observado que cada  30 años  una estrella ´´muere´´ y explota en un super nova  Astronomers have...
Si las estrellas evolucionan,  el nacimiento de estrellas y la muerte de estrellas debe ser igual. Novas  y  supernovas  s...
If stars evolve,  star births should equal star deaths. Novas and supernovas are star deaths.  Many have been observed.  W...
“ La vergüenza silenciosa de la a stro fìsica moderna es que  no sabemos como una de estas estrellas pudieron formar .” “ ...
 
Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for  signs and season...
He counts  the number of the stars;  He gives names to all of them.  Salmos  147:4 El cuenta  el número de las estrellas ;...
Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters  that  be  above the heavens.  Salmos  148:4 Alabadle, cielos de los ciel...
Who layeth the beams of his chambers  in the waters:  who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the...
It’s been estimated that there are enough stars for every individual on earth to own 11 trillion of them. (2003) Se ha est...
H U B B L E S P A C E T E L E S C O P E
Continuous  Viewing Zone An area 1/30 the size of the full moon, or about  the size of a grain of sand held at arms length...
¡ M às estrellas fueron vistas en esta pequeña àrea que podìan contar! More stars were seen in this small area than could ...
“ Stars are  so far away  that they appear to us to be just  pinpoints of light.  We cannot see their size or shape. So ho...
Known distance Unknown distance Simple trigonometry can figure distances within limits. Sine=Opp/Hyp  Cos=Adj/Hyp  Tan=Opp...
8000 miles
Merrill  Earth Science  1993 p. 631 Earth in June 93,000,000 miles =  1 AU =8 light minutes. Earth in January
Merrill  Earth Science  1993 p. 631 Earth in June 186,000,000 miles =  2 AU =16 light minutes. Earth in January
Earth’s orbit around the sun  is  16 light minutes  across. 1 Year = 525,948.76 minutes Earth’s orbit
16 inches 525,948 inches  or 8.3 miles .
Earth’s orbit around the sun  is  16 light minutes  across. 1 Year = 525,948 minutes A  one light year triangle  has an an...
Chicago, Illinois Measuring a distance 15 billion light years away is impossible! This is like having two surveyors, 16 in...
Merrill  Earth Science  1993 p. 631 Earth in June Can you tell  exactly  where you were 6 months ago? Earth in January
Parallax can measure  less than 100 light years.
Stellar Distances “ This accuracy will enable SIM to determine stellar distances… to  10% accuracy  out to a distance of  ...
Stellar Distances “ This accuracy will enable SIM to determine stellar distances… to  10% accuracy  out to a distance of  ...
Ahora podemos medir parte de una pequeña galaxìa. ¡Gran cosa !  ¡Què gran Dios servimos! We can now measure part way acros...
1. Scientists  cannot measure distances  beyond 100 light years accurately. 2. No one knows  what light is  nor that it al...
Matter Black Hole
FEB 18,1999 Houston Chronicle,  page 10A; ran an article about a Danish Physicist, Dr. Hau working at  Harvard,  being abl...
Scientists Bring Light To  Full Stop,  Hold It, Then Send It On Its Way By James Glanz  www.nytimes.com/2001/01/18/science...
Two independent teams of physicists have achieved the result, one led by Dr. Lene Vestergaard Hau of  Harvard University  ...
“ Physicists Briefly Freeze Pulse of Light”   “ We have succeeded in holding a light pulse still without taking all the en...
Eureka!  Scientists break speed of light Jonathan Leake, Science Editor Sunday Times [UK] June 4, 2000  UNITED STATES “ SC...
During the last 300 years, at least 164 separate measurements of the speed of light have been published.  Sixteen differen...
Speed of light has decayed.  Creation Tech. Journal,  June, 2000
The atomic clock. In 1956, following several years of work, two astronomers at the U. S. Naval Observatory (USNO) and two ...
What do the Evolutionists say? “ The speed of light was ten billion times faster at time zero!” Dr. V.S. Troitskii, Cosmol...
“ No physical law prevents anything from exceeding the speed of light.  In two published experiments,  The speed of light ...
 
What do the Evolutionists say? “ A shocking possibility is that the speed of light might change in time during the life of...
See also:  Constant Changes,  Science News, Oct. 6, 2001 p. 222
Inconstant Speed of Light May Debunk Einstein Wed Aug 7, 2002, 2:07 PM ET By Michael Christie   SYDNEY (Reuters) - A team ...
Inconstant Speed of Light May Debunk Einstein Wed Aug 7, 2002, 2:07 PM ET By Michael Christie   The suggestion that  the s...
September 20, 2002 Light-Speed Debate Impacts Origins Theories  By Stuart Shepard, correspondent  The  speed limit of the ...
September 20, 2002 Light-Speed Debate Impacts Origins Theories  By Stuart Shepard, correspondent  Astronomer Guillermo Gon...
April 2003
 
June 30, 2004 Speed of light may have changed recently  By Eugene Samuel Reich  “ The  speed of light,  one of the most sa...
3.  La creaciòn fue completa y madura cuando Dios la hizo.   T he creation was finished and mature when God made it.   Cos...
¿Què edad tenìa  Adam en el dìa 6?   How old was Adam on day 6?
God did not make two babies in the Garden of Eden and give them seeds to plant.  The creation was mature.
3.  The creation was finished and mature when God made it.   Adam was full grown, the trees had fruit on them.  The stars ...
5.  Since the speed of light is not proven to be consistent, why would star  distance  have anything to do with the  age  ...
So how do scientists measure the ages of stars? “ We can also find  absolute ages  by comparing a star’s color and brightn...
What about the Red Shift or Cepheid variables?
 
 
 
The Doppler effect causes the sound to be higher as the train approaches and lower as it passes.
 
“ This was an early sign that redshifts reliably indicate the distances of galaxies.   For QSOs [‘QSO’ = ‘Quasi-Stellar Ob...
“ In fact, there is little correlation of brightness to redshift at all!  Either QSOs come in an extremely wide range of i...
“ Thus for us the only conclusion that can be drawn is that at least some QSOs are relatively nearby, and that  a large fr...
Some redshifts are not due to the Doppler effect and an expanding universe.  “ Radical Theory Takes a Test,” Science,  291...
“ another set of observations  indicates  that the universe…  appears to be …  8.4 to 10.6 billion years…  The new work  r...
“ A team led by Nail R. Tanvir of the University of Cambridge in England used a two step method  to  estimate  the [Hubble...
“ You have to be  very careful  about [drawing conclusions] because all of the [Hubble constant]  measurements have huge s...
“ Astronomers believed the Veil, one of the best studied supernova remnants, was 2,500 Light Years away and 18,000 years o...
p. 56 “Even the nearest Cepheids are so remote that  it is difficult to determine their absolute distances with any great ...
p. 61 “We now know that  faintness  arises from two causes [distance and  absorbing matter in space],  and it is not gener...
To see what happened to Halton C. Harp, who dared expose the problems with the red shift theory,  See:  The Evolution Crun...
It is he that sitteth upon the  circle of the earth,  and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that  stretcheth ou...
Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and  stretched them out;  Así dice el Dios Jehová, el Criador de los...
I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have  stretched out the heavens,  and all their host hav...
He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath  stretched out the heavens  by ...
Stretching out from creation?-mentioned 11 times Tired light?  Effects of traveling great distances through ? In space.  D...
Great book showing the gospel story in the stars.  Available from CSE $10
Coral Ridge Ministries  PO box 40  Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33302 www.coralridge.org, 954-771-8840
Canst thou bind the sweet influences of  Pleiades,  or loose the bands of  Orion?  ¿Podrás tú impedir las delicias de las ...
 
Virgo the virgin
Leo the Lion
¿Està el sol encogièndose ? Is the Sun Shrinking?
The Sun is losing  5,000,000 tons  of matter per second.
Sun 1 Direct Measure Quote “ Since 1836, more than one hundred different observers at the Royal Greenwich Observatory and ...
Sun 2 Indirect Measure Quote “ Several  indirect  techniques also confirm that the sun is shrinking, although these inferr...
 
The sun would have absorbed Venus and Mercury.
What about Carbon Dating?
Geologic column from any textbook Fossils are really dated by their position in the  geologic column  which  does not exis...
<ul><ul><ul><li>“ Radiometric dating would not have been feasible if the geologic column had not been erected first.”   </...
<ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Ever since William Smith at the beginning of the 19th century,  fossils have been and still are the ...
<ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Apart from very ‘modern’ examples, which are really archaeology,  I can think of no cases of radioac...
The earth’s atmosphere is about 100 miles thick
1. The earth’s atmosphere contains:  78% nitrogen  21% oxygen .06% carbon dioxide   .0000765% radio-active carbon (c 14 ) ...
Earth’s magnetic field find and scan Radiation from the sun strikes the atmosphere and produces radio-active carbon 14. It...
 
 
 
A Geiger counter is used to detect  radio-active  elements such as C 14  or Uranium. Focus on Physical Science  1984 p. 485
C 14  is being produced in the atmosphere by the sun. It breaks back down to nitrogen at the rate of 1/2 every 5,730 years.
2. During photosynthesis plants breath in CO 2  and make it part of their tissue.  (some of the C is C 14 )   6CO 2 +6H 2 ...
 
 
For example: If the atmosphere is .0000756% C 14  it is assumed the plants and animals have the same %. 3. It is assumed t...
4. When the plant or animal  dies  it stops taking in new C 14 .
Whatever C 14  it has continues to  decay. 1/2 of the C 14  decays every 5,730 years. Since it cannot gain any more it wil...
1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16
5. By  comparing  the amount of C 14  in the object being dated with the amount  currently  in the atmosphere it can be  e...
6. While this all sounds good, there are  some assumptions  that enter in and throw it all off.
Water in Water out Equilibrium
It has been calculated that it would take 30,000 years for the earth’s atmosphere to reach equilibrium. It has not reached...
“ Radiocarbon is forming 28-37% faster than it is decaying” R.E. Taylor et al., “Major Revisions in the Pleistocene Age As...
Assumption #1 The amount of C 14  in the atmosphere has always been the same. (Has reached equilibrium).  Ron Cooper, Rcoo...
16 12 4 8 0 5,730 11,460 22,920 17,190 . . . . . 2 Expected Age in Years 28,650 . Carbon 14 Calibration Curve C 14 =.00007...
When was it lit? Empirical Science: 1. Measure height. (7 inches) 2. Measure rate of  burn.  Ex. 1”/hour. When was it lit?...
If you find a fossil in the dirt: The  amount  of C 14  can be measured and the  rate  of decay can be determined but that...
Visible Light X-Ray and UV Radiation (blocked) See Gen. 1:6-7 II Peter 3:3-7 Ps. 148:4
16 12 4 8 0 5730 11,460 22,920 17,190 . . . . . 2 Expected Age 28,650 . Carbon 14 Calibration Curve C14=.0000765% of  atmo...
“ The  lower leg  of the Fairbanks Creek mammoth had a radiocarbon age of  15,380 RCY  (radio carbon years) ,  while its  ...
Living mollusk shells were carbon dated as being  2,300 years old. Science  vol. 141, 1963 p. 634-637 M. Kieth and G. Ande...
“ If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the main text.  If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in...
A freshly killed seal was carbon dated as having died  1,300 years ago! Antarctic Journal   vol. 6 Sept-Oct.  1971 p. 211
“ One part of Dima [a baby frozen mammoth] was  40,000,  another part was  26,000  and the ‘wood immediately around the ca...
“ No matter how ‘useful’ it is, though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable resu...
Shells from living snails were carbon dated as being  27,000 years old. Science  Vol. 224, 1984  p. 58-61
Eleven human skeletons, the earliest known human remains in the western hemisphere, have been dated by the accelerator mas...
“ The two Colorado Creek, AK mammoths had radiocarbon ages of  22,850   670 and  16,150   230 years respectively.” Robert ...
“ A geologist at the Berkeley Geochronology Center, [Carl] Swisher uses  the most advanced techniques to date human fossil...
“ erectus was thought to have vanished some 250,000 years ago. But even though he used  two different dating methods,  Swi...
“ One part of the Vollosovitch mammoth carbon dated at  29,500  years old and  another part  at  44,000.” Troy L. Pewe,  Q...
“ In the last two years  an  absolute date  has  been obtained for    (the Ngandong beds, above the Trinil beds), and it h...
 
 
P. 30
P. 32- is it less than 20,000 or more than 28,000?
Living Penguins have been dated as being  8,000 years old!
Material from layers where  dinosaurs  are found carbon dated at  34,000  years old. R. Daly  Earth’s Most Challenging Mys...
Russian scientists Kusnetsov and Ivanov carbon dated  dinosaur bones at under 30,000 years.  Strange Stories, Amazing Fact...
Samples of  Known  Age Things to consider about Carbon Dating: Radioisotope Dating  Doesn’t Work Samples of  Unknown  Age ...
As elements decay they produce  helium.   This helium slowly escapes through the rocks into the atmosphere. Very little is...
A great book showing the problems with dating methods. Www.icr.org
“ The rocks do date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately.   Stratigraphy cannot avoid this kind of ...
on using only temporal concepts, because  circularity is inherent  in the derivation of time scales.”  O’Rourke, J. E., “P...
Moon rocks brought back in 1969, were given to many different laboratories to be dated.  One rock  (specimen 10017)  was d...
1-6-99 I talked with James P. Dawson  P.O. Box 1328  Edmond, Oklahoma  73083  Ph. (405) 348-3410,   He was  Chief of Engin...
This book has a great chapter about how dating is done. Available from CSE (850) 479-3466 $13
What about Potassium -Argon Dating?
Mt. Ngauruhoe New Zeland lava flow Pic
 
Carbon dating PHES p. 527 Potassium-40 half life of 1.30 billion years
“ As much as  80% of the potassium  in a small sample of an iron meteorite  can be removed by distilled water in 4.5 hours...
“ In conventional interpretation of  K-Ar  age data,  it is common to discard ages   which are substantially too high or t...
The KBS tuff, named for Kay Behrensmeyer, was dated using Potassium Argon (K-Ar) at  212-230 Million years.   Nature  Apri...
Skull #KNM-ER 1470 was found (in 1972)  under the KBS tuff  by Richard Leakey.  It looks like modern humans but was dated ...
Later, 10 different samples were dated from  .52- 2.64 Million years old.  (down from 212 million.)  Bones of Contention  ...
In 1770 George Buffon said the earth was  70,000 years old.  Integrated Principles of Zoology 1996  P. 151 In 1905 the age...
The Minneapolis Tribune Monday, August 25, 1969 In 1969 the official age of the earth and moon was 3.5 billion.
 
Today students are taught it is  4.6 billion  years old. That means the earth has been getting older at the rate of  21 mi...
Things to consider about Carbon Dating: 1.  Wild dates  are obtained. 2. Dates that don’t fit evolution theory are rejecte...
Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily  (122 BC)  gave K-AR age of  250,000 years  old. Dalyrmple, G.B., 1969 40Ar/36Ar analysis of ...
Lava from the 1801 Hawaiian volcano eruption gave a K-Ar date of  1.6 Million years  old. Funkhouser and Naughton, Journal...
Basalt from Mt. Kilauea Iki, Hawaii  (AD 1959)  gave K-AR age of  8,500,000 years  old. Impact  # 307  Jan. 1999 See also:...
Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily  (AD 1964)  gave K-AR age of  700,000 years  old. Impact  # 307  Jan. 1999, ICR.ORG
Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily  (AD 1972)  gave K-AR age of  350,000 years  old. Impact  # 307  Jan. 1999, ICR.ORG
New Lava dome growing inside the crater since the 1980 eruption. See ICR.ORG or call 619-448-0900 for more on Mt. St. Helens
Lava from the new lave dome that grew in Mt. St. Helens Washington gave these results: Austin, S. A. 1996,  Excess Argon W...
Rocks of  Known  Age Things to consider about Potassium Argon Dating: Radioisotope Dating  Doesn’t Work Rocks of  Unknown ...
1. Wild dates are obtained, potassium leaks out of systems easily. 2.  Dates that don’t fit evolution theory are rejected ...
For more on the  other dating methods  See:  The Evolution Cruncher  p. 58 Available from CSE $5 900+ pages!
For more on the  other dating methods the results of the RATE project by ICR.  Available from ICR.org
Have fresh dinosaur bones been found?
The Great Alaskan Dinosaur Adventure  p. 87 Master Books 800-999-3777  *
“ The journal  Science  on December 24, 1993  (pages 2020–2023) reported on the amazing preservation of the bones of a you...
In northwestern Alaska in 1961 a geologist found a bed of  dinosaur bones  in unpermineralized (unfossilized) condition.  ...
Along the banks of the Colville River west of  Prudhoe Bay, AK  frozen dinosaur bones were found that are, “as light as ba...
A young Inuit (Canadian Eskimo) who was working with scientists from Newfoundland’s Memorial University in 1987 on  Bylot ...
Time for Kids, April 27, 2000, p. 7
If there was really a flood, where are all the human bones?
Lubenow says there have been  about 4000 human remains found.  Very few complete and most only small fragments. Available ...
Creationist’s Time Line:  1”=150  years 0  Jesus’ Birth 2000 6000 years ago  (4000 BC) Creation 4400 YA Flood When God cre...
Tabla de la Población Humano Billion e s  de almas
Antediluvian life span chart Average life-span 900+ now: 70-100
And the LORD said,  I will destroy man  whom I have created from the face of the earth;  Génesis 6:7 Y dijo Jehová:  Raeré...
There were  giants in the earth in those days;  and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of me...
thumb bones call Ron Wyatt for new picture 615-331-6263 Done 8-25-97 Photo by Ron Wyatt 931-486-0557
 
Reasons why so few human fossils are found. 1.  There were  less people  to be killed than animals. 2.  People are smarter...
Was ancient man primitive?
Great book from creationist perspective on the incredible achievements of ancient man. Available from CSE $10 503-625-7679
What was it like before the flood?  How can a man live to be over 900 years old?
Antediluvian life span chart Average age before the flood was 912 years.  Today, 70-80 Chart is in seminar notebook or lam...
Airplane found in a grave in Columbia, SA.  Now in Smithsonian.  They estimate it to be about 1000 years old.  The Puzzle ...
Smithsonian has it labeled as a “stylized insect.”  The Puzzle of Ancient Man   Don Chittick p. 110.
Airplane found in a 2100 year old Egyptian tomb.
 
Cast Iron pot found in coal in 1912 at the Municipal Electric Plant in Thomas, OK.  Now in Creation Evidence Museum,  www....
 
 
100 ton stone in Sachsahuaman, Peru.  One stone weighs about 20,000 tons!  The largest crane on earth today can only lift ...
“ What is truly impossible about the block is that it is the size of a five story house and weighs an estimated 20,000 ton...
W. V. Mr. Newton Anderson found this bell  inside a lump of coal  in 1944.  He still has the bell.  I talked with him on 1...
4 1/2 inch high  zinc and silver  vessel found in solid rock  “over 600 million year old”  in  Dorchester, Mass. in 1851. ...
Analog computing device  found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in  100 BC.  National Science Foundation.  The Puzzle of A...
Analog computing device found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in 100 BC.  National Science Foundation.  The Puzzle of  An...
Analog computing device found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in  100 BC.   National Science Foundation.  Creation Ex Nih...
Found by Emma Hahn in June, 1934 in London, TX.  Sea shells surrounding the hammer had  been dated at 400 million  years o...
2000 year old battery found in Iraq.  Creation ex nihilo Mar. 1994, p. 12
World Explorer Magazine  Vol. 1 No. 6, p. 62, 815-253-6300
Trepanning
Stone from Ica, Peru showing brain surgery
 
 
Stone from Ica, Peru showing heart surgery?
 
 
 
In real life this little spider is 1/8 inch long and has the long “leg” on the right side only for mating.  How did they k...
Over the past several decades, South Afrikaans miners have found hundreds of metallic spheres, at least one of which has t...
metamorphics. As a result, the original sedimentary and igneous structures of these rocks have been, except locally, total...
The Mohs scale of hardness is named after Friedrich Mohs, who chose ten minerals as reference points for comparative hardn...
Mohs scale, indicating a relatively low degree of hardness. Furthermore, limonite concretions usually occur in groups, lik...
The Hidden History of the Human Race  Michael Cremo
Nano-technology artifacts  from the upper Pleistocene (approx. 2 million years ago), have been discovered in the Ural moun...
Since ancient classical times this fraction has been the &quot;iron rule&quot; in architecture and geometry. Its usefulnes...
Dr. E. W. Matveyeva, of the Section for Geology, Prospecting Techniques, and Economics of Precious Metal Alluvial Deposits...
Fib sequence
What about the Great Pyramid?
1. It was built by  godly people before  the flood. 2. It was built by  heathen before  the flood. There are basically 4 t...
 
In that day shall there be an  altar  to the LORD in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a  pillar  at the border thereof ...
 
 
It is the largest building in the world by far.
It contains enough stone to build a 10 foot high brick wall all the way around Texas!  Some of the stones weigh 70 tons.  ...
The entrance starts you on the broad way which leads to the pit or you can take the narrow way which leads to kings chambe...
Empty tomb
The pyramid was originally covered with 144,000 casing  stones that were fitly joined together so that in many cases the s...
And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an  hundred and forty and four thousand  of all th...
From whom  the whole body fitly joined together  and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effec...
Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures,  The stone which the builders rejected,  the same is become th...
And have ye not read this scripture;  The stone which the builders rejected  is become the head of the corner: Marcos 12:1...
And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written,  The stone which the builders rejected,  the same is beco...
Thou sawest till that a  stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet  that were of iron and clay,...
And I John saw the holy city,  new Jerusalem,   coming down  from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her h...
And there came unto me one of the seven angels … and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the ...
Cordero.  10  Y llevóme en el Espíritu a un grande, y alto monte, y mostróme  la grande ciudad, la santa Jerusalem,   que ...
Dr. Hutchings takes the position that the pyramid was built to be a testimony to the Lord.  Many have called it “the Bible...
This occult symbol was put on the back of the U.S. one dollar bill in 1935. MDCCLXXVI=   1776
Was the earth ever a hot molten mass?
Holt  Earth Science  1994 p. 280
And the spirit of God moved upon the face of the  waters. Génesis 1:2 …  y el Espíritu de Dios se movía sobre la haz de la...
w ww.halos.com Dr. Robert Gentry Powell, TN  423-947-4726
 
I met with Dr. Gentry 3-1-00 to see the polonium halos first hand.
218  Po half-life=3 minutes 214  Po half-life=.164 seconds
 
 
What about Global Warming?
For  the earth is the Lord’s  and the fulness thereof. 1 Corintios 10:26 Porque del Señor  es  la tierra , y la plenitud d...
When I consider  thy heavens,  the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, tha...
Salmos 8:3-8 poco menor que los ángeles, Y coronástelo de gloria y de lustre.  Hicístelo enseñorear  de las obras de tus m...
Karl Marx’s  Communist Manifesto   1848. 1. Abolish  private property. 2. Heavy progressive  income tax 3. Abolish rights ...
1. Abolish  private property. 2. Heavy progressive  income tax 3. Abolish rights of inheritance 4. Confiscation of propert...
And ye shall hallow the  fiftieth year,  and proclaim  liberty  throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: ...
And Judah and Israel dwelt safely, every man under  his vine  and under  his fig tree,  from Dan even to Beersheba, all th...
Drink waters out of  thine own cistern,  and running waters out of  thine own well.  Proverbios 5:15 Bebe el agua de  tu c...
“ We reject  the idea of  private property” Peter Berle, President of the National Audubon Society
A coloring page in a public school in Southwick, Massachusetts
I pledge allegiance to the world To care for earth, sea, and air To honor every living thing With peace and  justice every...
On 11-18-01 Jacob Bredsten,  (763-754-8987),  told me that when he was in  3rd grade  at  Johnsville Elementary school in ...
Available from Derry Brownfield 573-584-3317 R-12 sinks. A volcano can produce 1000’s of times more Ozone destroying mater...
Doesn’t the Green River Formation prove the earth is millions of years old?
Evolutionists often point to the  Green River Formation  as proof the Earth is millions of years old.
 
 
These layers formed very rapidly. The number of “annual layers between ash “event horizons” varies by 35%!  Creation Magaz...
What about the Mars rock?
 
Space Museum in Alamogordo, NM.  Photo- 3-04
Mars Lander “ The mars lander sampled the martian soil.  The sophisticated test performed on those samples  did not even f...
Space Museum in Alamogordo, NM.  Photo- 3-04
 
 
Namowitz/Spaulding 1989  p. 361
Prentice Hall  Earth Science 1991 p. 73
The facts to consider about this rock: 1. They claim it came from mars. 2. They claim it was broken off  16 million years ...
A study led by John Bradley of the Georgia Institute of Technology said the “fossils” are  “actually lamellae-fractured su...
And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because  she was the mother of all living.  Génesis 3:20 Y llamó el hombre el nombre ...
What about Theistic evolution?
What about theistic evolution?  Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean ...
What about theistic evolution?  Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? The “god” that would need to use ...
It is not the character of the God of the Bible  to use misfits, blind chance and death.  He gets it right the first time.
Jacque Monod, a Nobel Prize winner in biology when commenting on theistic evolution stated that: “ Natural selection is th...
<ul><li>I am surprised that a Christian would defend the idea  that this is the process which God more or less set up in o...
<ul><li>Philosopher David Hull of Northwestern University writes, regarding the implications of theistic evolution on the ...
The “god” of evolution is cruel! “ thus  from the war of nature, from famine and death,  the most exalted object which we ...
He is the Rock, his  work is perfect:  for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right ...
What about theistic evolution?  Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? The “god” that would use evolutio...
What about theistic evolution?  Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean ...
Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed  by the word of God,  so that things which are seen were not made ...
For in  six days  the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and  all  that in them is… Éxodo 20:11 Porque en  seis días  hi...
and rested  the seventh day:  wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.  y reposó en el  séptimo día:  ...
For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: ...
For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did  rest the seventh day  from all his works.  H...
And on the seventh day God  ended  his work which he had made; and he rested on  the seventh day from all his work  which ...
Wherefore, as  by one man sin  entered into the world, and  death by sin:  and so death passed upon all men, for that all ...
For since  by man came death,  by man came also the resurrection of the dead.  For as  in Adam all die,  even so in Christ...
“ And God said,  Let us make man in our image,  after our likeness… So God created man in his own image, in the image of G...
What about theistic evolution?  Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean ...
4. Nullifies the need for the death of Christ. 5. There is  no evidence for evolution anyway  so why compromise a perfectl...
Does the Bible match evolution? <ul><li>1. Earth before sun </li></ul><ul><li>2. Oceans before land </li></ul><ul><li>3. L...
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Carbon dating PHES p. 527
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Carbon dating PHES p. 527

17,169 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
17,169
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Now in LA area. 805-552-0332, 6930 Hastings St. Moorpark, CA 93021
  • Dear Shannon and Tim: I am responding to your e-mail to Dr. Kent Hovind. As his schedule permits he will probably offer his own response. Insofar as I can tell there has been very little legislative action in your state regarding textbook accuracy. There has been some court action which has not been favorable towards the teaching of creation in the public schools. The following synopsis details a recent decision: 8. In 2000, District Court Judge Bernard E. Borene dismissed the case of Rodney LeVake v Independent School District 656, et al . (Order Granting Defendants&apos; Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum, Court File Nr. CX-99-793, District Court for the Third Judicial District of the State of Minnesota [2000]). High school biology teacher LeVake had argued for his right to teach &amp;quot;evidence both for and against the theory&amp;quot; of evolution. The school district considered the content of what he was teaching and concluded that it did not match the curriculum, which required the teaching of evolution. Given the large amount of case law requiring a teacher to teach the employing district&apos;s curriculum, the judge declared that LeVake did not have a free speech right to override the curriculum, nor was the district guilty of religious discrimination. As you can see from the decision the courts in Minnesota are not creation-friendly. I do believe, based on Article 1 Section 16 (see below) of the Minnesota Constitution that an effective challenge could be made against the forcing of children to attend classes teaching evolution as a fact and not a theory. If you are interested in pursuing this matter, please let me know. Seeing as your other questions were directed to Dr. Hovind, I will not respond to them. Thank you for contacting CSE. Be blessed, Maury Adkins Sec. 16. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE; NO PREFERENCE TO BE GIVEN TO ANY RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENT OR MODE OF WORSHIP. The enumeration of rights in this constitution shall not deny or impair others retained by and inherent in the people. The right of every man to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience shall never be infringed; nor shall any man be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any religious or ecclesiastical ministry, against his consent; nor shall any control of or interference with the rights of conscience be permitted, or any preference be given by law to any religious establishment or mode of worship; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of the state, nor shall any money be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious societies or religious or theological seminaries. Sec. 17. RELIGIOUS TESTS AND PROPERTY QUALIFICATIONS PROHIBITED. No religious test or amount of property shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust in the state. No religious test or amount of property shall be required as a qualification of any voter at any election in this state; nor shall any person be rendered incompetent to give evidence in any court of law or equity in consequence of his opinion upon the subject of religion.
  • Feds drop case after professor changes evolution policy By SEBASTIAN KITCHEN AVALANCHE-JOURNAL The Justice Department has closed its case against Texas Tech and a biology professor after he changed his policy for giving recommendations - a policy that, the government alleged, &amp;quot;constituted religious discrimination.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The new policy rightly recognizes that students don&apos;t have to give up their religious beliefs to be good doctors or good scientists,&amp;quot; Ralph F. Boyd Jr., assistant attorney general for civil rights, said in a prepared statement. &amp;quot;A biology student may need to understand the theory of evolution and be able to explain it. But a state-run university has no business telling students what they should or should not believe in.&amp;quot; Professor Michael Dini changed the criteria and wording on his Web site to alleviate any question that he required students to affirm a personal belief in evolution. The Web site now states that students must be able to explain the scientific theory of evolution. The Justice Department in quiry was opened in January after it received allegations of religious discrimination. Some students, medical professionals and members of the Liberty Legal Institute believe that Dini&apos;s letter of recommendation policy discriminated against students who do not accept the theory of evolution. Since complaints surfaced, university officials, including Chan cellor David Smith and former President David Schmidly, had supported Dini and his ability to create his own policy. A Tech spokeswoman said Dini never asked people to disavow their religious beliefs, but he wanted them to be able to explain the theory of evolution in scientific terms. &amp;quot;Dr. Dini will not do anything now he didn&apos;t do previously,&amp;quot; said Cindy Rugeley, vice chancellor for news and information &amp;quot;He has never required people to take a religious stand. ... He never, never asked anyone to disavow their religious beliefs.&amp;quot; University officials did not ask Dini to change his Web site or policy, Rugeley said. She said the change was a personal decision. Rugeley said Dini did not change his policy, but clarified it. &amp;quot;Our opinion hasn&apos;t changed from day one that a professor can use whatever criteria they want to make a recommendation,&amp;quot; Ruge ley said. &amp;quot;Our position all along has been a professor or any individual ... can establish their own criteria for making a recommendation.&amp;quot; Dini could not be reached for comment Tuesday. The complaint was filed by Plano-based Liberty Legal In stitute, a legal organization that specializes in the defense of religious freedoms. Institute staff said the change is a victory. &amp;quot;He was forced to change his policy,&amp;quot; said staff attorney Hiram Sasser. &amp;quot;He now has a new policy, and as long as he is applying it in a constitutional way, everything will be great. This is complete victory.&amp;quot; Sasser said Dini&apos;s actions and policy were a &amp;quot;clear constitutional violation.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;He won&apos;t be engaging in any religious discrimination any more,&amp;quot; Sasser said. Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel for the institute, said: &amp;quot;It&apos;s sad that we had to file a complaint with the Justice Department, but telling students what they have to believe has never been the purpose of a university and its professors. We&apos;re thankful for the assistance of the Justice Department in restoring freedom to students. This is what we were after from the beginning.&amp;quot; The original letter to Tech from the Department of Justice outlined the concerns with Dini&apos;s policy. &amp;quot;Specifically, the complaint against Texas Tech and Professor Dini alleges, among other things, that Professor Dini discriminates against those with certain religious beliefs when determining for whom he will write a letter of recommendation, because he excludes from consideration those who will not affirm a personal belief in human evolution,&amp;quot; the Justice Department letter states. skitchen@lubbockonline.com 766-8753
  • http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/HST/press/ngc1850.html NGC 1850 TALE OF TWO CLUSTERS YIELDS SECRETS OF STAR BIRTH IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE Press release PR94-40. This NASA Hubble Space Telescope (HST) image shows rich detail, previously only seen in neighboring star birth regions, in a pair of star clusters 166,000 light-years away in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), in the southern constellation Doradus. The field of view is 130 light-years across and was taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2. HST&apos;s unique capabilities -- ultraviolet sensitivity, ability to see faint stars, and high resolution -- have been utilized fully to identify three separate populations in this concentration of nearly 10,000 stars down to the 25th magnitude (more that twice as many as can be seen over the entire sky with the naked eye on a clear night on Earth). The field of view is only 130 light-years across. Previous observations with ground-based telescopes resolve less than 1,000 stars in the same region. About 60 percent of the stars belong to the dominant yellow cluster called NGC 1850, which is estimated to be 50 million years old. A scattering of white stars in the image are massive stars that are only about 4 million years old and represent about 20 percent of the stars in the image. (The remainder are field stars in the LMC.) Besides being much younger, the white stars are much more loosely distributed than the yellow cluster. The significant difference between the two cluster ages suggests these are two separate star groups that lie along the same line of sight. The younger, more open cluster probably lies 200 light-years beyond the older cluster. If it were in the foreground, then dust contained in the white cluster would obscure stars in the older yellow cluster. To observe two well-defined star populations separated by such a small gap of space is unusual. This juxtaposition suggests that supernova explosions in the older cluster might have triggered the birth of the younger cluster. This color composite image is assembled from exposures taken in ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared light. Yellow stars correspond to Main Sequence stars (like our Sun) with average surface temperatures of 6000 Kelvin; red stars are cool giants and supergiants (3500 K); white stars are hot young stars (25,000 K or more) that are bright in ultraviolet.
  • 5,862,392,539,234.56=miles/light year 82.2245 light years 25,000 parsec
  • 5,862,392,539,234.56=miles/light year 82.2245 light years 25,000 parsec
  • Jane Platt Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (Phone: 818/354-0880) RELEASE: 03-176 FROZEN LIGHT: COOL NASA RESEARCH HOLDS PROMISE NASA-funded research at Harvard University, Cambridge,Mass., that literally stops light in its tracks, may someday lead to breakneck-speed computers that shelter enormous amounts of data from hackers. The research, conducted by a team led by Dr. Lene Hau, a Harvard physics professor, is one of 12 research projects featured in a special edition of Scientific American entitled &amp;quot;The Edge of Physics,&amp;quot; available through May 31. In their laboratory, Hau and her colleagues have been able to slow a pulse of light, and even stop it, for several-thousandths of a second. They&apos;ve also created a roadblock for light, where they can shorten a light pulse by factors of a billion. &amp;quot;This could open up a whole new way to use light, doing things we could only imagine before,&amp;quot; Hau said. &amp;quot;Until now, many technologies have been limited by the speed at which light travels.&amp;quot; The speed of light is approximately 186,000 miles per second (670 million miles per hour). Some substances, like water and diamonds, can slow light to a limited extent. More drastic techniques are needed to dramatically reduce the speed of light. Hau&apos;s team accomplished &amp;quot;light magic&amp;quot; by laser-cooling a cigar-shaped cloud of sodium atoms to one-billionth of a degree above absolute zero, the point where scientists believe no further cooling can occur. Using a powerful electromagnet, the researchers suspended the cloud in an ultra-high vacuum chamber, until it formed a frigid, swamp-like goop of atoms. When they shot a light pulse into the cloud, it bogged down, slowed dramatically, eventually stopped, and turned off. The scientists later revived the light pulse and restored its normal speed by shooting an additional laser beam into the cloud. Hau&apos;s cold-atom research began in the mid-1990s, when she put ultra-cold atoms in such cramped quarters they formed a type of matter called a Bose-Einstein condensate. In this state, atoms behave oddly, and traditional laws of physics do not apply. Instead of bouncing off each other like bumper cars, the atoms join together and function as one entity. The first slow-light breakthrough for Hau and her colleagues came in March 1998. Later that summer, they successfully slowed a light beam to 38 miles per hour, the speed of suburban traffic. That&apos;s two million times slower than the speed of light in free space. By tinkering with the system, Hau and her team made light stop completely in the summer of 2000. These breakthroughs may eventually be used in advanced optical-communication applications. &amp;quot;Light can carry enormous amounts of information through changes in its frequency, phase, intensity or other properties,&amp;quot; Hau said. When the light pulse stops, its information is suspended and stored, just as information is stored in the memory of a computer. Light-carrying quantum bits could carry significantly more information than current computer bits. Quantum computers could also be more secure by encrypting information in elaborate codes that could be broken only by using a laser and complex decoding formulas. Hau&apos;s team is also using slow light as a completely new probe of the very odd properties of Bose-Einstein condensates. For example, with the light roadblock the team created, they can study waves and dramatic rotating-vortex patterns in the condensates. The Harvard research team includes Hau; Drs. Zachary Dutton, Chien Lieu, Brian Busch and Michael Budde; and graduate students Christopher Slowe, Naomi Ginsberg and Cyrus Behroozi. More information about Hau&apos;s research is available on the Internet, at: http://www.physics.harvard.edu/fac_staff/hau.html http://spaceresearch.nasa.gov http://funphysics.jpl.nasa.gov Hau conducts research under NASA&apos;s Fundamental Physics in Physical Sciences Research Program, part of the agency&apos;s Office of Biological and Physical Research, Washington. NASA&apos;S Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., a division of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, manages the Fundamental Physics program. Niels Ejvind Andersen Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • June 4, 2000 UNITED STATES Eureka! Scientists break speed of light! Jonathan Leake, Science Editor SCIENTISTS claim they have broken the ultimate speed barrier: the speed of light. In research carried out in the United States, particle physicists have shown that light pulses can be accelerated to up to 300 times their normal velocity of 186,000 miles per second. The implications, like the speed, are mind-boggling. On one interpretation it means that light will arrive at its destination almost before it has started its journey. In effect, it is leaping forward in time. Exact details of the findings remain confidential because they have been submitted to Nature, the international scientific journal, for review prior to possible publication. The work was carried out by Dr Lijun Wang, of the NEC research institute in Princeton, who transmitted a pulse of light towards a chamber filled with specially treated caesium gas. Before the pulse had fully entered the chamber it had gone right through it and travelled a further 60ft across the laboratory. In effect it existed in two places at once, a phenomenon that Wang explains by saying it travelled 300 times faster than light. The research is already causing controversy among physicists. What bothers them is that if light could travel forward in time it could carry information. This would breach one of the basic principles in physics - causality, which says that a cause must come before an effect. It would also shatter Einstein&apos;s theory of relativity since it depends in part on the speed of light being unbreachable. This weekend Wang said he could not give details but confirmed: &amp;quot;Our light pulses did indeed travel faster than the accepted speed of light. I hope it will give us a much better understanding of the nature of light and how it behaves.&amp;quot; Dr Raymond Chiao, professor of physics at the University of California at Berkeley, who is familiar with Wang&apos;s work, said he was impressed by the findings. &amp;quot;This is a fascinating experiment,&amp;quot; he said. In Italy, another group of physicists has also succeeded in breaking the light speed barrier. In a newly published paper, physicists at the Italian National Research Council described how they propagated microwaves at 25% above normal light speed. The group speculates that it could be possible to transmit information faster than light. Dr Guenter Nimtz, of Cologne University, an expert in the field, agrees. He believes that information can be sent faster than light and last week gave a paper describing how it could be done to a conference in Edinburgh. He believes, however, that this will not breach the principle of causality because the time taken to interpret the signal would fritter away all the savings. &amp;quot;The most likely application for this is not in time travel but in speeding up the way signals move through computer circuits,&amp;quot; he said. Wang&apos;s experiment is the latest and possibly the most important evidence that the physical world may not operate according to any of the accepted conventions. In the new world that modern science is beginning to perceive, sub-atomic particles can apparently exist in two places at the same time - making no distinction between space and time. Separate experiments carried out by Chiao illustrate this. He showed that in certain circumstances photons - the particles of which light is made - could apparently jump between two points separated by a barrier in what appears to be zero time. The process, known as tunnelling, has been used to make some of the most sensitive electron microscopes. The implications of Wang&apos;s experiments will arouse fierce debate. Many will question whether his work can be interpreted as proving that light can exceed its normal speed - suggesting that another mechanism may be at work. Neil Turok, professor of mathematical physics at Cambridge University, said he awaited the details with interest, but added: &amp;quot;I doubt this will change our view of the fundamental laws of physics.&amp;quot; Wang emphasizes that his experiments are relevant only to light and may not apply to other physical entities. But scientists are beginning to accept that man may eventually exploit some of these characteristics for inter-stellar space travel.
  • The sun is burning at a terrific rate. It is losing 5,000,000 tons of matter every second. That’s about 5 feet per hour. If it has been burning at this rate for billions of years,... It’s getting smaller!
  • Billions of years ago it would have been so big that it would have fried everything on earth. Think of it , there are two planets in our solar system closer than ours.( Venus and Mars) The sun would have absorbed these two planets long ago.(gravity would be greater to) The universe cannot be billions of years old. In 6000 years there is no problem, with that amount of mass loss.
  • Les Zerbe 907-322-8807 cell, 907-479-3779 home- frozen dinosaur on Coleville River. Harvey Mehlos 262-691-4712, wants to help also.
  • “ For more than 65 million years…” However, the bones were of “… very good quality, well preserved, and overly rich in amino acids.” We also learn that “their structure was porous and the fossils were not remineralized.” (Don Lessem, Omni, January 1990, pl. 32) “ I got goose bumps…It was exactly like looking at a like of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn’t believe it….The bones are, after all 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?”” (Science, Research News. V. 261, September 7;, 1993). Our efforts to discover what these creature were like in life are, of course, hampered by many obstacles resulting form the millions upon millions of years separating us from them. But we are fortunate in knowing even the texture of their skin in some cases. Among the huge long-necked, long-tailed sauropods, a section of tuberculared skin pattern was found on a single leg bone in England; and in the great Howe Quarry I Wyoming we found isolated loose patches of skin impression all over the quarry--indeed, impressions not only of the skin pattern but the actual skin substance itself. This has been sectioned and studied under the microscope, and it shows a structure similar to the shed skin of a snake or lizard. This is the oldest unaltered animal substance known, approximately 140 million years old. The surface of this skin is composed of small, low tubercles or bumps, the size of a pinhead,, not overlapping as in the scales of fishes or snakes or in the mosasaurian (marine) reptiles. P. 295Natural History, December 1941
  • Egyptian king lists are exaggerated as shown by Courville’s research (1956). Evolution Cruncher p. 49.
  • Amazon Trees Gain Mass http://216.239.33.104/search?q=cache:3vqeOtgSspgJ:web. mit . edu /12.000/www/m2006/teams/ julipe /week4.html+%22forest+fires+are+%22+co2+ amazon &amp;hl=en&amp; ie =UTF-8 Scientists do not know what is causing the increase in mass of Amazon trees during the past 20 years.  Oliver Phillips of the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom believes that the Amazon forests have become more massive, because the amount of Carbon they absorb from the atmosphere has increased.  This indicates that they are acting as a huge &amp;quot;carbon sink,&amp;quot; and they are keeping some of the carbon they absorb. It was thought that trees released as much carbon as they absorbed. The latter theory is not the only explanation for the growth of forest mass. Another theory says that there are more nutrients available because of human activities. Forest fires are releasing nitrogen into the atmosphere. Afterwards the nitrogen is absorbed by clouds and then returned to Earth as rain to fertilize the forests. There is a third possibility obtained from research led by Stephen Pacala, an ecologist at Princeton University in New Jersey. He has studied a similar carbon-sink effect in the United States. He thinks this is the result of the re-growth of previously logged forests. Let&apos;s assume that the Amazon forests are gaining mass because of the carbon-sink effect, and then we should ask how long the effect will last. Researches have shown that this effect will last only a few years. The amount pf nitrogen limits the effect. A computer modeling study done recently by Peter Cox, a scientist at the Hadley Center for Climate Prediction in the United Kingdom, shows that as temperatures increases, forests would possibly dry out and become a reason of increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and not a reason of decreasing this amount as they are now. References: http://news. nationalgeographic .com/news/2001/12/1213_ carbonsink .html   Studies Measure Capacity of &amp;quot;Carbon Sinks&amp;quot; Scientists are getting a better idea of the amount of carbon that Earth&apos;s forests absorb from the atmosphere, acting as &amp;quot;carbon sinks.&amp;quot; New research in this area will be very important in devising solutions to the global warming problem. Recent studies have found that more diverse plant ecosystems are better able to absorb carbon dioxide. When old growth forests like this one are clear cut, timber companies often replant the areas with a single tree species, a practice known as &amp;quot;monoculture,&amp;quot; which reduces the biodiversity. Scientists know that forests, crops, soils, and other organic matter absorb carbon, slowing down the rate of global warming. The results in calculating haw much carbon is absorbed differ. Different Measuring Techniques How much carbon is &amp;quot;stored&amp;quot; has been measured in two ways: one atmosphere based, the other land based. 1. Atmosphere based: measures concentrations of CO2 in the air when it is moving from point A to point B. 2. Land base: makes an inventory of all the carbon in a given area.  Then the variation of this amount is recorded. The results of the atmospheric methods are similar to each other, and they have shown higher levels than the land based method. This was because in land based methods, only the amount of carbon in tress was taken in account. Now they took in account the carbon absorbed by landfills, soils, houses, etc. These results are now consistent with the atmosphere based method. Reference: http://news. nationalgeographic .com/news/2001/06/0621_ carbonsinks .html Forest Fire: Friend Or Foe? http://www. angelfire .com/ma/ dansfirefighting /page2.html   Wild forest fires strike in every season of the year and in most parts of the United States, but many people do not understand the facts about these very important fires. Their only knowledge of these great fires comes from Smokey the Bear, who, for many years has heralded fire prevention and suppression with the slogan, &amp;quot;only you can prevent forest fires&amp;quot;. In recent years, a question has arisen about forest fires; should humans use excessive fire prevention to fight forest fires or should the forest be allowed to burn, unhindered? The goal of this project is to present the facts about forest fires, to present the views of the opposing sides of the fire suppression argument, and to attempt to answer the question: forest fires, Friend or Foe? Forest fires can either be seen as one of nature&apos;s most destructive forces or as one of nature&apos;s wonders. Whichever view one may hold, the facts and truths remain the same. In order to further evaluate the argument ensuing over forest fire suppression one must examine the simple facts about the fires themselves and the way they affect the environment.1 These facts must be examined objectively and with an open mind. The United States contains over 700 million acres of forest. Many of these forests are found in Alaska and throughout the United States in National Parks and wildlife reserves. Still, a good percentage of the forest is populated by humans and contains people&apos;s investments. Over the last five years the United States averaged around 495 wild fires per year for a total of 258,962 burnt acres per year. In 1997 alone their were 6,425 wild fires which accounted for the destruction of 1,632,224.7 acres of forest. The following graph shows the number of fires along with their causes for 1997. SEE ENCLOSED GRAPH ATTACHMENT As one can see the majority of fires were started by lightning. The rest of the fires were set by human factors. Compared to 1997, the past year&apos;s wild fires were few and very small. In 1998 there were only 437 reported wild fires. These fires accounted for the burning of over 61,583 acres, a small percentage of the 1997 wildfires. This major decrease is mainly due to the effects of el niño and la niña. These weather phenomenon were responsible for the increase in the Santa Ana winds in California and were also responsible for reasonably hot, dry, arid weather throughout the country. Nevertheless fire suppression played an important role in limiting the amount of fires during 1998. Wildfires in the United States have long been viewed as detrimental to the ecosystem. However, recent studies have shown that the forest ecosystems need fire in order to survive and flourish. Forest fires are now seen as nature&apos;s way of cleaning house or refurbishing itself. Hundreds of years of extreme fire suppression have led to a problem in the forest ecosystems. Without fire, woody debris has accumulated on the forest floor. The debris has become dry and arid and is now the prefect fuel for wild fires. When uncontrollable wild fires do occur the results can be catastrophic, due to the woody debris on the ground these fires can burn exceptionally hot, for longer times, and may even kill fire-tolerant vegetation species.2 Furthermore, &amp;quot;some plants that require fire for reproduction may be endangered by the absence of fire.&amp;quot;3 These types of plants produce cones that can release seeds only when temperatures reach a height only found inside the depths of a fiery inferno. In order to combat the effects of forest fire suppression, the U.S. Department of Interior along with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Association , the National Parks Service, and the National Forestry Fire Service have implemented controlled burning or &amp;quot;prescribed burning&amp;quot; of the forest. This effort is being made in hope of preventing large, extremely hot wildfires, and in hope of resynthesizing the natural pattern of fires in the wild. Over the past five years an average of 224,575 acres have been burnt using this method. In 1998, 1,334 prescribed fires were set for a total of over 277,890 acres of burnt forest. (These statistics are not included in the averages and wildfire statistics found earlier in this report.) Although the facts seem fairly straight forward the solution to the wild fire situation remains a question. Are forest fires friend or foe? This seems to be a question that is not so easily answered. On one side of the issue are the many businessmen, economists, and land owners who feel forest fires are &amp;quot;a bane rather than a benefit&amp;quot;4. On the other side of the issue are the many ecologists and environmentalists who claim &amp;quot;If you want a healthy forest, then you want forest fires. You want them often and you want them to be widespread.&amp;quot;5 By examining each side&apos;s stance on forest fires, when to suppress wildfires, and the use of prescribed burning one can gain a better understanding of each side&apos;s opinions and views. One can also hope to find a solution to the question at hand. Wildfire suppression has become increasingly difficult in recent years. Many people are creating permanent homes within the confines of the forest. Others use the forest for their livelihood and some own forest land for its value. These people want to protect their investments and have come to view fire as the enemy. Fire to most Americans is destructive, damaging, and sometimes lethal. When fire strikes, lumber companies loose trees and money, homeowners loose there possessions, and property, land is devalued, and firefighters loose their lives protecting others &amp;quot;property&amp;quot;. Those who see fire as a destructive force call for extreme fire suppression. Often their views are shaped by history&apos;s stereotypical image of fire. Urban fires are seen as damaging and destructive, because life and private property are often lost. This has caused a &amp;quot;stop the fire at all costs&amp;quot; mentality to appear in the public&apos;s mind. The public who are uneducated, employed by governmental agencies that depend on fire suppression, contractors who supply equipment to these agencies, the news media who use fire as a great story, and those people who own property in the forest are in favor of fire suppression at all cost. These people see the glamour of the firefighter running out of a blazing forest just before it reaches spontaneous combustion; they see the great news story; or they see the money involved in these fires, and they want the hundreds of years of fire suppression to continue. Fire is seen as evil and many people choose to ignore the facts about the benefits of forest fires. What most people do not know is that in order for the forest to survive, fire is needed. Before man, the forest and its fires ran their own natural course. Modern man disrupted this course through their hatred of fire. They changed this abiotic factor before they knew how it would affect the biota within the forest ecosystems. People need to be made aware of the facts.(Which have already been mentioned.) People need to realize that in order to maintain the beauty of the forest, which they were trying to protect with fire suppression and prevention, it must be allowed to burn. However, allowing the forest to burn does not mean letting the forest burn uncontrollably. This would result in extreme crown fires. That is fires that ignite both the forest floor and the trees which in a normal fire usually remain unharmed. This results in another question of when to use fire suppression and when to allow a fire to burn. The Department of Interior, which often sides in favor of fire suppression, has divided fires into two distinctive categories of prescribed fires and wildfires. There policy states they will suppress all wildfires, which will not be used as a tool in managing a forest. The USDA Forest Service, which often sides with environmentalists, states that they will allow wild fires to burn until they threaten private property or human lives and only use prescribed burning when wildfires do not supply enough fire to benefit the forest properly. While neither side can decide when to extinguish fires, they do agree that prescribed burning is necessary. Environmentalist and ecologist have stated that in order to protect the forest prescribed burning must gradually be introduced into the forest ecosystem to synthesize fires that would have occurred naturally without human interruption. Prescribed burning is even seen as a method of fire suppression due to the fact that it cuts down on the amount of dead debris on the forest floor. Most people, both those in favor of extreme fire suppression and those against it agree on prescribed burning. A question still remains over when to use prescribed burning and the best places to use it. Not everyone agrees and many of the decisions are left to the people actually doing the prescribed burns. The answer to the question, Forest fire, friend or foe, is not an easy one to find. While forest fires are good for the forest and do benefit the environment, they can also be dangerous and deadly. The answer seems to be in a compromise between the two side of the issue. This compromise comes in the form of prescribed burning. It is the one element that each side agrees upon. It is an efficient method of preventing extremely hazardous crown fires and also allows the forest to regenerate. The problem is then not with fire prevention but with fire suppression. Seeing that over half of the wildfires on record are started by man most people want to put them out as quickly as possible. However some people feel that they should be allowed to burn until they endanger human property or lives, but wildfire is unpredictable. We feel that the best solution would be to suppress all wildfires as quickly as possible seeing that they often can become uncontrollable and deadly at a minutes notice. Prescribed burning should then be implemented where necessary. If an area is particularly cluttered with dry debris it should be dealt with in a controlled setting before it needs to be dealt with in an uncontrolled setting. This solution would save both property and forest. It would be a compromise between the two opposing sides of the argument. However compromise is difficult and as of today there is no set regulation on fire suppression and prescribed burning. Different agencies complete these tasks differently and until they can all decide upon one set course of action the debate over forest fire, friend or foe, will continue. Written By Daniel Boardman and Julie Ribeiro   Information for this project was taken in part from the following locations. Allison- Brunnell , Steve. &amp;quot;Stressed out about Being Fire-Free.&amp;quot; Smoke Jumpers: They Know Fires Fire Ecology Homepage Biomass Burning USDA Forest Service, Oregon and Washington Profile, Fire in the Ecosystem United States Dept. of Interior US Fish &amp; Wildlife Fire Statistics US Forest Service. - &amp;quot;Smokey Says&amp;quot;  Email: elgriton24@ aol .com
  • This worldwide religious gathering had a very strange omission – all crosses and other “Christian objects were removed or covered. The name of Jesus was never mentioned.
  • The Catholic Crusaders slaughtered thousands of Jews across Europe as they made their way to the Holy Land to recover the land for the “new chosen people of God.” Catholics and Muslims regard pilgrimages as a means of obtaining favor from God. The hadj , one of the five pillars of Islam, is a required (one-time) journey to Mecca. For Catholics, pilgrimages historically have been acts of religious purification, often induced by the promise of indulgences. Multi-millions of Catholics travel yearly to hundreds of shrines (nearly all dedicated to Mary) located throughout the world. Both have enormous wealth, Islam controls most of the world’s oil supplies. Both have strong influence on governments throughout the world.
  • According to Vatican Council II “It is true the RCC is the new people of God Satan is the source of anti-semitism for 3000 years.
  • Mary has a place in Islam too, says a Vatican aide. &amp;quot;God is the only point of reference for the Muslim believer, but next to him are those who reflect his holiness. Mary is one of them ,&amp;quot; ROME, MAY 29, 2003 (Zenit.org).-
  • Reported sightings of Mary have steadily increased across the globe. People of all religions are flocking to apparition sites with reported healings and other supernatural happenings. Many of the apparitions of Mary make it clear she has come for all her children including Muslims, Catholics and Protestants and that people of all religions can be saved apart from Jesus Christ as long as they live good lives.
  • The 43-page document, The Gift of Authority, stated only the Pope had the moral authority to unite the various Christian denominations. -Electronic Telegraph-UK News May 13, 1999 Oliver Poole http://www.freerepublic.com/
  • The waters which you saw where the harlot sits, are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues. Rev. 17:15
  • The pope and his cardinals wear these same colors. They are arrayed in beauty, glamour, and splendor which is far removed from the sackcloth that the two witnesses of God will wear during the Tribulation. The beautiful and magnificent Vatican, in the city of Rome, is very enticing, even intoxicating. The Vatican museum is filled with golden chalices, papal crowns covered in precious stones,
  • The golden cup that the whore uses has external beauty, however,the inside of the cup is filled with the filth of her adulteries. It is full of sin and deception. It is also full of wine that intoxicates people and dulls their senses to the pure truth of God’s Word. What does Mystery Babylon the Great mean? MYSTERY indicates the secretive aspect of the false religion. The RCC often explains away its blasphemous dogmas as mysteries. BABYLON was the birthplace of idolatry and the origin of all Satan’s religions THE GREAT. This denotes the magnitude of this false religion.
  • Traditional Catholicism has always strived for complete religious control of the entire planet. No longer able to put torture and murder its opponents, it has developed a new strategy Seduction rather than force is now in vogue.
  • Because Dr. Jerry Vines cast aspersions upon Mohammed for taking a 6-year-old bride (an accusation that can be easily supported with historical facts) Mohammed was a slave to his sexual appetite, an appetite that seemed to be insatiable. In fact Mohammed&apos;s sexual life was the talk of the desert since he had sexual relations with each wife every day before prayers! So the story goes. He had the stamina of 30 men and needed it since he had more than 20 women including his concubines and slaves in his harem! (See the Hadith, vol. one, no. 267, 268, and 270.) Selod Faroog, an orthopedic surgeon and an Islamic spokesman in Fort Worth, said: &amp;quot;People who can&apos;t face the truth come out and make accusations like this. If Muhammad was heavily involved in multiple wives, he wouldn&apos;t have had time to spend all night praying like tradition says.&amp;quot; Of course, Mohammed had multiple wives. His sex life was legendary! And much of it was wishful thinking of his fevered mind! Mohammed spent each night with a different wife but when it was Hafsa&apos;s turn she was visiting her father, so what&apos;s a man to do? Mohammed took Mary his Egyptian slave to bed, but Hafsa returned early to find Mary in her bed with her husband. Fireworks in old Arabia! Hafsa agreed not to tell anyone but decided to tell Aisha, and soon all Mohammed&apos;s wives were in rebellion. Mohammed promised to stay away from Mary if the harem would calm down; however he had another vision or fit and the angel Gabriel gave him special permission to change the rules. Sex with a slave was acceptable. Rank hath its privileges, and in spades for the Prophet! Sura 66:15 is the message that Allah gave to Mohammed that solved his marriage mess: &amp;quot;O Prophet! Why have you forbidden yourself that which God has made lawful unto you [i.e., Mary], out of desire to please your wives, for God is forgiving and merciful? Verily God has sanctioned the revocation of your oaths, The Prophet had entrusted a secret to one of his wives but she repeated it and God revealed it to him. If he divorces you, God will give him in your stead wives more submissive unto God, believers, pious, repentant, devout, fasting; both Women married previously, and virgins.&amp;quot; Principled Muslims have gagged on that sura for centuries. But it gets worse, if possible. Mohammed conjured up the temporary contractual marriage whereby a man is permitted to &amp;quot;marry&amp;quot; a woman for 15 minutes for the purpose of sex! This fact is endorsed by one of Islam&apos;s top guns, Al Baydaivi who wrote, &amp;quot;The purpose of the contractual marriage is the mere pleasure of intercourse with a woman.&amp;quot; Mohammed later repudiated this policy. Mohammed&apos;s sexual appetite caused him more trouble when he was at his adopted son&apos;s home with his beautiful new bride, Zaynab. His son, Zaid was not home and Zaynab was not fully dressed, and Mohammed exclaimed, &amp;quot;Good lord, Heavens, how you turn the hearts of men!&amp;quot; His adopted son divorced his wife and she married Mohammed. But even in that seventh century desert culture such a thing was considered incestuous. So Gabriel came to the rescue with another of Mohammed&apos;s famous swoons or fits informing him that it was all right to have his son&apos;s wife! After the heavenly message of approval, Mohammed said, &amp;quot;Who will go and congratulate Zaynab (his new bride) and say that the Lord has joined her to me in marriage?&amp;quot; (See sura 33:36-38.) His young wife Aisha had an interesting retort to his most recent &amp;quot;vision&amp;quot; when she said, &amp;quot;Truly your God seems to have been very quick in fulfilling your prayers.&amp;quot; Sarcasm is not called for, Aisha, but how about fresh poison mushrooms for your husband?
  • All the ancient empires with their powerful armies and great wealth have long been destroyed. But Israel continues to exist because of a Covenant God made with Abraham 4000 years ago.
  • The fact that Israel now occupies the land is an offense to Allah and contrary to the teachings of the Koran.
  • After signing the Israel PLO peace accord with Prime Minister Rabin, Arafat said “In the name of Allah, peace for us means the destruction of Israel.” 1980 El Mundo, Venezuela. According to the PLO, the struggle with the Zionist enemy is not a struggle about Israel’s borders but about Israel’s existence. This hatred of the Jews is indoctrinated at an early age: In an Egyptian fifth grade text book it says “The Arabs do not cease to act for the extermination of Israel.
  • There are many who believe Christians, Jews and Muslims all worship the same God but this could not be further from the truth.
  • Islam says Abraham sacrificed Ishmael not Issac. Islam is the fastest growing faith in the world and is now the dominant religion in more than 50 countries of the world. One converts to Islam by simply declaring &amp;quot;There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his messenger.“
  • Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, because it is popular with those who despise America and all we stand for. Muslim children are continuously being taught to become suicide bombers. This type of ‘religious training’ guarantees another generation of terrorists are being groomed for the cause of Islam. According to the Chairman of Council of American Islamic Relations : ‘Islam is in America to become dominant. The Qur&apos;an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth’ (Report in the San Ramon Valley Herald of a speech to California Muslims in July 1998; quoted by Daniel Pipes in CAIR: Moderate Friends of Terror , New York Post, April 22, 2002)
  • On June 25, the following statement was broadcast on national TV in Saudi Arabia &amp;quot;Jihad today has become an individual duty that applies to each and every Muslim. It is forbidden for a person to remain silent. ... The program called for the killing of Jews and Christians and the ultimate takeover of the United States by Islam. (WorldNetDaily) Muslims has always regarded war or Holy Jihad, as a legitimate means of converting people to their religion. Historically, conquered Jews and Christians who refused to convert to Islam were allowed to live by paying a &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; tax. However, pagans were given only one choice - convert or die. Freedom of religion is forbidden by Islamic states. For a Muslim to &amp;quot;apostatize&amp;quot; means, severe harassment, imprisonment, torture and death. Most of the areas in the world that arenow controlled by Islam were conquered by the sword. No major area has ever reconverted to their original religion after being forced to accept Islam.
  • The reason Islam is often identified as a peaceful religion is because Mohammed wrote the Qur’an at two different times in his life. Early in his career at Mecca he wrote 92 Suras, which expressed kindness to non-Muslims. The last 24 surahs were written at Medina at the end of his career and called for the destruction of non-muslims A 1997 report to the state department stated that “80% of all mosques and Muslim charitable organizations in the U.S. had been taken over by extremists who did not represent the mainstream community.” Here’s another alarming statistic, It is estimated that 300,000 prisoners in the U.S have converted to Islam and the rate of conversion is 30,000 per year. (Islam and Democracy by Mernissi)
  • Why has there not been any Muslims that have spoken out against these terrorists activities. Why the silence from the Muslim world. There is no doubt that terrorism had its birth in the Qur’an, It prupose is to produce fear intimidation and constant threats. According to Islamic theology – the only way a person can be assured of heaven is to sacrifice their life for the spread of Islam. Dick Cheney, “The terrorists want to impose their way of life on the rest of us and in pursuit of this goal they are prepared to slaughter anyone who stands in their way. (7/27/04, Camp Pendleton)
  • Comments: Bible -vs- Koran: Comparisons of Chirstianity verses Islam 6th Sur verse 1: (Koran) All praise be unto Ala the creator of the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1 (Bible) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 19th Sur verse 66: (Mohammed asks) &amp;quot;When I am dead and buried in the ground, and go back to dust, is that all? What will happen to me? John 11:25 (Jesus says) I AM the resurrection and life. He that believeth in me though he were dead, yet shall he live again. 3rd Sur 144: (Mohammed says) I am only a messenger of Ala and nothing more. John 14:6, (Jesus says) I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man cometh unto the Father but by me. 4th Sur verse 3:
  • Comments: Bible -vs- Koran: Comparisons of Chirstianity verses Islam 6th Sur verse 1: (Koran) All praise be unto Ala the creator of the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1 (Bible) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 19th Sur verse 66: (Mohammed asks) &amp;quot;When I am dead and buried in the ground, and go back to dust, is that all? What will happen to me? John 11:25 (Jesus says) I AM the resurrection and life. He that believeth in me though he were dead, yet shall he live again. 3rd Sur 144: (Mohammed says) I am only a messenger of Ala and nothing more. John 14:6, (Jesus says) I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man cometh unto the Father but by me.
  • Our God is a merciful God and excepts all Humans no matter what color or creed. Another important fact to show to Black Muslims is the fact that history shows that it was Arabic&apos;s who were the first people to enslave Africans, yet Islamics all change their names to Arabic names! Go figure. Do Muslims know Mohammed? Of course not, he&apos;s dead! However, we as Christians know Jesus, because He Lives!!! Here&apos;s some more comparisons for you. According to history, ALA came out of Heathenism. ALA was the name of the Pagan Moon god. Why do you think the Islamic flag has the moon shape with the stars around it? Because they worship the Sun, Moon, and Stars and Islam was founded upon that principal and ALA their god was the Pagan Moon god. God told Israel in Deut 4:32, &amp;quot;Do not worship the sun, moon, and stars.&amp;quot; The English word God is from the Hebrew noun Elohim. &amp;quot;EL&amp;quot; means the Strong One. Combined as Elohim it literally means The Strong One Who Created.
  • Repentance:9:5 When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful. 9:29 Fight against such of those to whom the scriptures were given as believe in neither God nor the last day, who do not forbid what God and His apostle have forbidden, and do not embrace the true faith? Until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued. Muhammad 47:3-6 This, because the unbelievers follow falsehood. While the faithful follow the truth from their Lord. Thus God lays down for mankind their rules of conduct. When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take a ransom from them, until war shall lay down her burdens. Thus shall you do. Had God willed , He could himself have punished them; but He has ordained it thus that He may test you, the one by the other.
  • Some Provocative Questions Every RLDS Should Consider 1.         The Book of Mormon tells of the final battle between the Nephites and Lamanites. This battle took place on Hill Cumorah in New York, where the gold plates were hidden. If hundreds of thousands of people fought in this Great War, as the Book of Mormon claims, why are there no artifacts as evidence? ( Book of Mormon p. 702-703). 2.         Why did Joseph Smith try to join the Methodist Church in 1828, when in his 1820 vision the Lord supposedly commanded him to join none of them (Baptist, Methodist and Presbyterian churches) as they were all an abomination in his sight? (The Amboy Journal, April 30, 1879, p. 1, and June 11, 1879). 3.         Why did Joseph Smith’s mother, Lucy, brothers, Hyrum and Samuel, and sister, Sophronia, stay involved in the Presbyterian Church until 1828? Didn’t his own family believe Joseph’s vision was from God?” (Sessions Records, Western Presbyterian Church of Palmyra). 4.         Why weren’t the three witnesses to the Book of Mormon taken into Joseph Smith’s house and literally shown the gold plates, instead of being taken to the woods where they only witnessed them in a “vision”? (RLDS Church History, Vol. l, Ch. 4, p. 46) 5.         According to the claims of the Book of Mormon, the Lord led three groups of people to America from the Middle East — the Jaredites (approx. 2200 B.C.), the Nephites and the Mulekites (approx. 600 B.C. before the exile). How could any of the three groups have brought the Urim and Thummim to America when they were still being used in Jerusalem in 458 BC after the Jewish exile? (See Ezra 2:62-63) 6.         Why would the Lord give Joseph Smith the Urim and Thummim to translate the gold plates when traditionally they were used by the high priest for the purpose of making decisions , not translating languages ? (Exodus 28:30). 7.         Since, according to the Bible, human beings do not become angels when they die, how could Moroni (a general in the Book of Mormon narrative) have come to Joseph Smith bearing a message and be identified as an angel? Jesus taught that we become like angels at the resurrection in the sense that we will not procreate (Mark 12:25; See Angels, Angels, Angels , by Billy Graham). 8.         In Section 83:3c of the Doctrine and Covenants, Joseph Smith stated that without the authority of the priesthood no man could “see the face of God, even the Father, and live.” Since Joseph claimed to see the Father and Son in 1820, and the priesthood was not restored until 1829, how could he have lived through the experience? 9.         Why does the Book of Ether say that the language of the Jaredites was not confounded at the tower of Babel, when Genesis states that the Lord confounded all the languages of the earth at that time? (Gen. ll:6, I.V., Book of Mormon, Ether 1:7-11) 10.     Why would Joseph Smith say Baptism for the Dead was the most “glorious of all subjects belonging to the everlasting gospel?” (Doctrine and Covenants, 110:17a). Shouldn’t the most glorious subject be the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ? 11.     How could Moses, who murdered an Egyptian, appear in glory on the Mount of Transfiguration if, according to Joseph Smith, murder is an unpardonable sin? (Doctrine and Covenants, Sec. 42:6, Exodus 2:l2; Matthew 17:3) 12.     A martyr is one who willingly lays down his life for his beliefs. How could Joseph Smith have died a martyr when he fought for his life and shot three men (killing two) before being killed himself? (Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? pp. 258, 259) 13.     Why does the Book of Mormon teach that Adam and Eve could not have had children unless Adam fell? When God told Adam and Eve to be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth, they were still in the Garden of Eden before the fall . (Book of Mormon, II Nephi 1:115; Genesis 1:30 I.V.) 14.     Why did the leadership of the RLDS church accept the “Joseph Smith III blessing” as genuine and include it as appendix G in the Doctrine and Covenants, then later have to remove it when it was discovered to be a forgery? Where was their prophetic discernment? 15.     In Lucy Mack Smith’s book, “Joseph Smith and His Progenitors, (page 120), she tells of an incident where her son fought off attackers while, “running at the top of his speed” through the woods for three miles with the gold plates tucked under his arm. How could that have been possible when the plates were estimated to weigh approx. 230 pounds? Also, how could Emma Smith have moved them “…from place to place as it was necessary in doing my work”? ( Saints Herald , October 1, 1879) 16.     The Book of Mormon states that there are only two churches, the church of God and the church of the devil. If the RLDS Church is the only true church (thus the church of God), does that mean that all other Christians churches make up “the church of the devil?” (Book of Mormon, I Nephi, 3:220-222) 17.     How could 1820 have been the year of Joseph Smith’s grove experience when Rev. Lane and Rev. Stockton, (the Methodist and Presbyterian ministers who attended the revival), were not assigned to the Palmyra area until 1824? (Wesley Walters, “New Light on Mormon Origins” pp. 7-l0) 18.     Joseph Smith claimed that Adam and Eve moved from Mesopotamia to Daviess County, Missouri, after they were expelled from the Garden of Eden. 1) How did they get there? 2) Why doesn’t the Bible mention anything about such a remarkable move? ( Doctrine and Covenants , Sec 104:28a) 19.     What is so disturbing or embarrassing to the RLDS Church about the following historical documents, all written by Joseph Smith but excluded from the RLDS canon of Scriptures: Book of Abraham, Book of Moses and Lectures of Faith? 20.     Why have several of Joseph Smith’s “inspired revelations” in the Doctrine and Covenants been moved from the main body to the appendix and then out of the book altogether? (See sections l07, ll0, ll3, etc.) Are his revelations becoming increasingly embarrassing to the leadership of the church? 21.     How could a record written in the Egyptian language help Jewish people preserve the language of their fathers which was Hebrew? (Book of Mormon I Nephi, 1:82; Mosiah 1:6) 22.     Why were New Testament teachings such as Christian baptism practiced in the Book of Mormon hundreds of years before Christ was born? (Mosiah 9:44) 23.     Joseph Smith records that an angel visited him in his bedroom in l823 and instructed him about obtaining the gold plates. In Church History, Joseph said the angel’s name was Nephi, but in the Doctrine and Covenants, he said it was Moroni. Why the contradiction, and which is correct? (RLDS Church History, Vol. 1, p. 12; Doctrine and Covenants 26:2; 110:20) 24.     In June of 1831, a General Conference was held at Kirtland where several elders were ordained as high priests. It is stated in Church History that “this was the first occasion in which this priesthood (Melchizedek) had been revealed. If this is true, what priesthood did the six elders hold that organized the church on April 6, 1830? ( RLDS Church History , Vol. 1, p.194) 25.     Why did Joseph Smith embrace Masonry, when the Book of Mormon explicitly teaches against secret combinations? Why do many RLDS members join the masons when to do so they have to repeat the following vow: “ I am in darkness and want to be led into the light of Free Masonry?” Do they really believe they are in darkness by belonging to the RLDS Church? 26.     Why did John the Baptist, and Peter, James, and John have to restore priesthood authority on Joseph Smith when RLDS doctrine teaches that at least four men with authority (the apostle John and the three Nephites) never died, but still remain on the earth? ( Doctrine and Covenants , Sec. 7:1 B.C. Book of Mormon , 3 Nephi 13:13-19) 27.     There is no record in the New Testament of any individual ever having a priesthood conferred upon him in an ecclesiastical ceremony. With regard to ordaining men, there are a total of eighteen occurrences of the English verb, to ordain, in the New Testament. None of them however, speak of ordaining to the priesthood, but rather they refer to men being chosen to fill a particular office or to carry out a specific task. Why, then, do the RLDS teach that ‘the laying on of hands’ is necessary in ordaining eligible priesthood members? 28.     How could Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery have been ordained to the Aaronic priesthood by John the Baptist before they were baptized? ( RLDS Church History , Vol. 1, pp. 35, 36). 29.     According to the Aztec religion, Quetzalcoatl (“the feathered serpent”) was just one of many pagan gods who was part deity and part cultural hero…In worshipping these pagan gods, it was a common practice to offer human sacrifices. Why would RLDS want to claim that Quetzalcoatl was Jesus Christ? Also, it has been determined that Quetzelcoatl first appeared about AD 1,000. How does this fit Book of Mormon chronology? 30.     Why did Oliver Cowdery record in his l834 history of the church, that in l823 Joseph Smith did not even know if a supreme being did exist? Surely if Joseph had been visited by the Father and Son in l820, he would have remembered it three years later! Remember, Oliver’s history was written under Joseph Smith’s supervision. (See “A Reproduction of A Series of Letters written by Oliver Cowdery by the Church of Jesus Christ” RLDS Historians Office.) 31.     Fred M. Smith, former RLDS Prophet stated, “…is it not true that the Lord called upon educated men to represent him? [2] Why would an “inspired man of God” make this statement in light of the Biblical statement, “When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled, ordinary men they were astonished and they took note … ” (Acts 4:l3) 32.     Why is there no Biblical or historical record of a man named Lehi, who had lived in Jerusalem all his life , and who along side Jeremiah, prophesied of the coming destruction of Jerusalem? 33.     Why did Emma Smith, David Whitmer, Martin Harris, and Isaac Hale, all agree that Joseph Smith put a seer stone in a hat (an occult device) to translate the Book of Mormon, when Joseph himself said he translated it by the gift and power of God? (Saints Herald, Nov. 15, 1962, pp. 14-22) 34.     How could Alma, in the Book of Mormon, have been a High Priest when he belonged to the tribe of Joseph (Manasseh), and not the tribe of Levi? The Bible teaches that High Priests must be descendants of Aaron and belong to the tribe of Levi. (Mosiah 11:17, 9:2, I Nephi 1:165, Num. 3) 35.     Why would Joseph Smith name Isaiah and Esaias as two separate men when they are one and the same? Esaias is the Greek name for Isaiah! ( Doc and Cov. Sec. 76) 36.     Why would Nephi tell the people 600 years before Christ, to “…feast upon the words of Christ?” (II Nephi l4:4) 37.     Since High Priests could only serve in the Aaronic (Levitical) priesthood by commandment of God, why did Joseph Smith include them in a Melchizedek priesthood? 38.     How could Nephi have used a compass over 500 years before Christ (I Nephi 5:190), when the magnetic compass was first used by the Chinese around 1100 AD? 39.     Why would Joseph Smith admonish his people not to drink “wine or strong drink” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 86) and then attempt to construct a bar in the Mansion House and only reneged when his wife Emma declared, “Either that bar goes, or I go”? (Saints Herald, Feb. 1999, p. 18, Doc. and Cov. Sec. 86) 40.     If a fourteen-year-old boy appeared at your door one morning and told you the Lord had shown him in a vision that all existing churches, (including the RLDS church), were an abomination in His sight and that he (the14-year-old) had been chosen by God to establish a new church which would be the “only true church” would you believe him? If not, why not? Joseph asked the people of his day to accept his testimony with only himself as a witness!
  • II Chronicles 21:20 says that Ahaziah&apos;s dad began to reign at age thirty-two. He reigned for eight years and then died (at age forty). Obviously his son could not have been forty-two at that time! However, it is also possible that there were a couple of kings that reigned in quick succession here (since Ahaziah only reigned one year). Supporting this idea is the confusion of names that appear for the king at this time (Jehoahaz in II Chronicles 21:17 and Azariah in 22:6). Moreover, Matthew 1:8 completely skips this part of the genealogy, further confusing the issue. It also appears that Azariah was a VERY common name. Note in II Chronicles 21:2 that Ahaziah had two uncles named Azariah! Perhaps one of them reigned briefly. The age difference would certainly fit. Note also below.   2KI 9:27 Jehu shot Ahaziah near Ibleam. Ahaziah fled to Meggido and died there. 2CH 22:9 Ahaziah was found hiding in Samaria, brought to Jehu, and put to death.   It is very possible that we are dealing with two different individuals. In support of this, II Kings describes how Jehu, after shooting Ahaziah, goes to Samaria and kills numerous other members of the royal family (II Kings 10:12-14). Furthermore, the Ahaziah that is killed in II Chronicles 22:9 is said to be the son of Jehosophat (rather than grandson), and in II Chronicles 21:2 we note that Jehosophat did have two sons named Azariah. Note also above.
  • II Chronicles 21:20 says that Ahaziah&apos;s dad began to reign at age thirty-two. He reigned for eight years and then died (at age forty). Obviously his son could not have been forty-two at that time! However, it is also possible that there were a couple of kings that reigned in quick succession here (since Ahaziah only reigned one year). Supporting this idea is the confusion of names that appear for the king at this time (Jehoahaz in II Chronicles 21:17 and Azariah in 22:6). Moreover, Matthew 1:8 completely skips this part of the genealogy, further confusing the issue. It also appears that Azariah was a VERY common name. Note in II Chronicles 21:2 that Ahaziah had two uncles named Azariah! Perhaps one of them reigned briefly. The age difference would certainly fit. Note also below.   2KI 9:27 Jehu shot Ahaziah near Ibleam. Ahaziah fled to Meggido and died there. 2CH 22:9 Ahaziah was found hiding in Samaria, brought to Jehu, and put to death.   It is very possible that we are dealing with two different individuals. In support of this, II Kings describes how Jehu, after shooting Ahaziah, goes to Samaria and kills numerous other members of the royal family (II Kings 10:12-14). Furthermore, the Ahaziah that is killed in II Chronicles 22:9 is said to be the son of Jehosophat (rather than grandson), and in II Chronicles 21:2 we note that Jehosophat did have two sons named Azariah. Note also above.
  • Professor Anthony Hort, co-worker with Professor Brooke Westcott (both of Cambridge) who created the new Greek Text of the NIV, NASB, and other contemporary “Holy Bibles” states: “ Whatever people may say to the contrary, the American empire is a standing menace to the whole civilization of Europe, and sooner or later one or the other must perish…surely, if every Babylon or Rome were rightly cursed,, it cannot be wrong to desire and pray from the bottom of one’s hearts that the American union be shivered to pieces.” Fenton John Anthony Hort’s Letter, Vol. 2. P. Www.wayoflife.com-two James Molenkot and a lady were both homosexuals so they did not use sodomite in the NIV.
  • Scoffers always said that the references to Jesus in Isaiah where written in after the life of Jesus. Because the oldest manuscript of Isaiah was 900 years A.D.
  • From: Teno Groppi [tgroppi@new.rr.com]Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 3:23 AMTo: TOM melton; KJB1611DS-aol.com; Herb F EvansCc: Josh Ray; Pastor Floyd; Pastor Mike Paulson; akjb.bellsouth; Kent HovindSubject: Creation and the KJV &apos;04        Here is a new version of this sermon I just finished, with several added verses. Here at 3:00 AM on Sunday morning, the Lord has shown me several I did not previously have. Now I have to get some sleep so I can teach a Sunday School class in the morning on &amp;quot;Giants in the Earth&amp;quot; (see #4).        Thanks to Karl Priest for sending me the information that robbed me of most of a night&apos;s sleep, but maybe it will keep Satan from robbing some people of God&apos;s word.***********************************************Turn to Rom 2 for our starting point ...         Creationists are noted for taking the Bible literally - and that&apos;s a good quality for a Bible believer to have. We believe in a literal creation, we believe the days are literal, the garden of Eden is literal, Adam and Eve were literal, the fruit and the fall were literal - and the serpent was literal. But I marvel that many creationists, who rely on the specific, particular, literal wording of scripture for their beliefs, are so often willing to accept modern versions.         Once a literal creationist leaves an absolute standard, he has given the evolutionist grounds to find verses that refute standard creationist beliefs in whatever version he can avail himself of. There are plenty to choose from to find something worded to support anyone&apos;s private agenda. Every heretical group has its favorite versions that can be spun their way. Liberals like the RSV. Feminists like the TNIV. JWs and the RCC like many modern versions, queers love the NIV. Is queer too harsh? The Bible calls then abominable sodomite dogs, is that nicer? We&apos;re going to see which versions the evolutionists would like - and the creationist has no right to rebuke the evolutionist for appealing to versions that say it they way they want when the multi-version creationist is doing the same thing himself. The creationist who uses other versions has just given the evolutionist permission to use other versions to circumvent the clear teachings of scripture - and some of them do it.         Frankly, I&apos;m surprised that more evolutionists don&apos;t take advantage of this. Multi-version creationists give them the rope to hang themselves with, and lots of evolutionists miss the golden opportunity to beat them over the head with their own Bibles.Rom 2:20-21 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. 21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal?Verse 21 1/2 could read: &amp;quot;Thou that chasteneth another for using liberal versions, dost thou use modern versions?         The Bible word for such a person is HYPOCRITE.         Turn to Eph 3. The very first example I&apos;m going to give is enough by itself to cause any Christian with the spiritual discernment of a cabbage patch doll to reject all of the modern versions:1) CREATED BY CHRIST FROM THE BEGINNING(KJV) Eph 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the BEGINNING of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things BY JESUS CHRIST:         Let&apos;s try the supposed &apos;best-seller&apos;, the &apos;conservative&apos; NIV:(NIV)  ... which for AGES PAST was kept hidden in God, who created all things. [by nobody]         Ages past? What does that tell you? Not much. Not as much as &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; - that is specific, settled. And Somebody is missing from the verse. Who might that be? Only Jesus Christ - apparently nobody important if you want to have a Bible version with the &amp;quot;same message&amp;quot;.(NASB)  ... which for AGES has been hidden in God who created all things; [by nobody]         Same problems.(ASV)  ... which for AGES hath been hid in God who created all things; [by nobody]         Same again - it&apos;s a conspiracy! Let&apos;s try the liberal versions.(RSV)  ... mystery hidden for AGES in God who created all things; [by nobody](ESV) ... mystery hidden for AGES in God who created all things, [by nobody](NLT)  ... God, the Creator of all things, had kept secret from the beginning. [by nobody](CEV) God, who created everything [by nobody], wanted me to help everyone understand the mysterious plan that had always been hidden in his mind.          Hey! Two versions (NLT &amp; CEV) that got it half right! Except they left out Jesus too. What good are all these versions (seven, yeah eight of the most popular) that leave out Jesus? BTW, Jesus Christ is in the Greek Textus Receptus here. My Nestles Alexandrian Greek text omits Jesus Christ, but has a footnote, and the critical apparatus lists several Alexandrian texts that contain  Jesus Christ. Why would a modern version want to take Jesus Christ out of the Bible? Who would be the inspiration for that?         Maybe the New KJV get is right. That&apos;s translated from the same manuscripts, they say.(NKJV) ... which from the beginning of the AGES has been hidden in God who created all things THROUGH Jesus Christ;         Closer, but still not there. &amp;quot;Beginning of the ages&amp;quot; sounds like a compromise of a politically correct liberal politician. Even the NotKJV doesn&apos;t have Jesus Christ actually doing the creating. The Real King James has the creation done BY Him, but the New King James has the creation done &amp;quot;through&amp;quot; Him, which can mean almost anything. That sounds like a politically correct Catholic liberal politician.         Is removing Jesus Christ only a &amp;quot;minor&amp;quot; change that &amp;quot;doesn&apos;t affect any doctrine&amp;quot; and has the &amp;quot;same message&amp;quot;?John 1:1-3  In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.         It is essential to specify Jesus Christ, God the Son, the Word of God made flesh, as the Creator. That&apos;s one of the great ways to prove that Jesus is deity, that He is God. The modern versions have diluted the doctrine of the deity of Christ - yet they claim they don&apos;t affect any major doctrine. Apparently the Godhood of Christ is not a major doctrine to modern version editors - and it isn&apos;t, if you read some of what they say.        How can you witness to a lost evolutionist (or any lost person), that Jesus Christ is the Creator, when they can take virtually ANY popular modern version and find Him stricken from this verse?  Here&apos;s another similar passage:2) ONLY BEGOTTEN WHAT?(KJV) John 1:18  No man hath seen God at any time; the only BEGOTTEN SON, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.(NIV)  No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father&apos;s side, has made him known.(NASB)  No one has seen God at any time; the only BEGOTTEN GOD who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.(RSV)  No one has ever seen God; the ONLY SON, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.(AMP) No man has ever seen God at any time; the only unique Son, or the only BEGOTTEN GOD, Who is in the bosom [in the intimate presence] of the Father, He has declared Him [He has revealed Him and brought Him out where He can be seen; He has interpreted Him and He has made Him known].(NLT) No one has ever seen God. But his ONLY SON, who is himself God, is near to the Father&apos;s heart; he has told us about him.(CEV) No one has ever seen God. The ONLY SON, who is truly God and is closest to the Father, has shown us what God is like. (ESV) No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father&apos;s side, he has made him known.        No matter how you slice it, these all say DIFFERENT things. They do not say the same thing in different words. They do not have the same &amp;quot;message&amp;quot; or doctrine here.        The NIV calls the One at the Father&apos;s side, &amp;quot;God the One and Only&amp;quot;. Does that mean the Father is not God? The verse doesn&apos;t even say that Jesus is God&apos;s Son at all here, it refers to THE Father. That doesn&apos;t even say He&apos;s Jesus&apos; Father!        The NASB reads along with the JWs NWT doctrine and makes Jesus a BEGOTTEN GOD, instead of a begotten SON. Yet, MVers will reject the NWT and accept the NASB as a &amp;quot;valid&amp;quot; Bible, despite this BLATANT DAMNABLE HERESY of making Jesus a CREATED god. For this one horrific heresy alone, the NASB should be rejected by anyone with the spiritual discernment of a dried raison.        The RSV errs in the other direction. Whereas the other two omit the word &amp;quot;Son&amp;quot;, this one omits the word &amp;quot;begotten&amp;quot;. So now we have Jesus being the ONLY Son of God. Batfeathers! ANY saved person is a Son of God! This is a doctrinal error.         Turn to the OT, Micah 5. If you can believe it, this next example is even worse than these:3) ANCIENT ORIGINS(KJV) Micah 5:2 But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose GOINGS FORTH have been from of old, from EVERLASTING.         This is a clear prophecy of Jesus Christ. Prophecy is one of the key proofs that the Bible is the Supernatural word of God. And this is one of the most stunning prophecies of Jesus Christ - it gives the very town He will be born in, what family He&apos;ll belong to, and some specific things about His life - all in one little verse written 700 years before Jesus was born. Let&apos;s see the daily horoscope try that! Surely no Bible version would mess up at such an important place.(NIV) ... whose ORIGINS are from of old, from ANCIENT times.         What? Whose origins? From old, ancient times? Either that&apos;s not talking about Jesus, or they are making Jesus into a created god like the cults do.(RSV) ... whose ORIGIN is from of old, from ANCIENT days.         Oh oh, same thing.(NLT) ... one whose ORIGINS are from the DISTANT PAST.(CEV) ... someone whose FAMILY goes back to ANCIENT times.(ESV) ... whose ORIGIN is from of old, from ANCIENT days.         His origins are from the distant past. No, that&apos;s not better at all, it still strips Jesus Christ of His deity and makes Him a created false god. He is not the everlasting Word/Son of God.         How can a Christian convince an evolutionist from such versions? We&apos;re supposed to be apt to teach and able to convince the gainsayers of God&apos;s truth. How can we do that with a Bible version that says what they believe? And that&apos;s what they do say! That&apos;s why we call them per-versions. How can a Christian witness to a lost person and tell Him about Jesus when the lost evolutionist can grab almost any modern version and show that Jesus wasn&apos;t God, He had an origin, and He wasn&apos;t the Creator! The multi-version creationists have a different Creator than the King James Bible!         Those two verses should be enough to make any Christian with the brain waves of lime jello chuck his fake Bible and get the real one. BTW, according to Ripley&apos;s Believe it or Not, lime jello gave off emissions on an EEG test. I don&apos;t know who thought to check lime jello for brain waves on an EEG, probably the same people who found out that licking certain toads creates a high.4) GIANTS IN THE EARTH(KJV) Gen 6:4  There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.(NIV) The Nephilim were on the earth in those days ...(ASV) The Nephilim were in the earth in those days ...(ESV) The Nephilim were on the earth in those days ...(CEV) ... Nephilim and lived on the earth at that time ...(NASB)  The Nephilim were on the earth in those days ...(RSV) The Nephilim were on the earth in those days ...         What is a Nephilim? I thought it was the King James that was supposed to be difficult and archaic? Nephilim is the Hebrew word. Why didn&apos;t the modern versions translate it into English so we could understand it?5) WHAT DIED?Gen 6:13  And God said unto Noah, The end of ALL FLESH is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.        All flesh of land dwellers that breathed from their nostrils died (as explained in 7:21-23).(NIV) Gen 6:13 So God said to Noah, &amp;quot;I am going to put an end to all PEOPLE, ...(CEV) Gen 6:13 So he told Noah: Cruelty and violence have spread everywhere. Now I&apos;m going to destroy the whole earth and all its PEOPLE. (AMP) Gen 6:13 od said to Noah, I intend to make an end of all flesh, for through MEN the land is filled with violence; and behold, I will destroy them and the land.        These modern versions either say or imply that the flood is limited to killing people, not animals.6) GREAT GOD FORMED ALL THINGS(KJV) Prov 26:10  The great God that FORMED ALL THINGS both rewardeth the fool, and rewardeth transgressors.(NIV) Like an archer who wounds at random is he who hires a fool or any passer-by. (NASB) Like an archer who wounds everyone, So is he who hires a fool or who hires those who pass by. (AMP) [But] like an archer who wounds all, so is he who hires a fool or chance passers-by.(NLT) An employer who hires a fool or a bystander is like an archer who shoots recklessly.(ESV) Like an archer who wounds everyone is one who hires a passing fool or drunkard.(CEV) It&apos;s no smarter to shoot arrows at every passerby than it is to hire a bunch of worthless nobodies.(ASV) As an archer that woundeth all, So is he that hireth a fool and he that hireth them that pass by.        When I first saw this I thought there was a typo in the reference, but it&apos;s not - they&apos;ve removed  God as the creator and replaced Him with some kind of Robin Hood or William Tell shooting arrows at drunks and fools.7) THE EARTH IS THE LORD&apos;S(KJV) 1 Cor 10:28  But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that showed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord&apos;s, and the fulness thereof:(AMP) But if someone tells you, This has been offered in sacrifice to an idol, do not eat it, out of consideration for the person who informed you, and for conscience&apos;s sake-- [end of verse](NLT) But suppose someone warns you that this meat has been offered to an idol. Don&apos;t eat it, out of consideration for the conscience of the one who told you. (ESV) But if someone says to you, &amp;quot;This has been offered in sacrifice,&amp;quot; then do not eat it, for the sake of the one who informed you, and for the sake of conscience--(CEV) But if you are told that it has been sacrificed to idols, don&apos;t cause a problem by eating it. I don&apos;t mean a problem for yourself, but for the one who told you. Why should my freedom be limited by someone else&apos;s conscience? (ASV) But if any man say unto you, This hath been offered in sacrifice, eat not, for his sake that showed it, and for conscience         They totally remove the statement of ownership of the earth!8) GOD FORMED JESUS CHRIST?(KJV) Prov 8:22-23  The LORD *possessed* me in the beginning of his way, BEFORE his works of old. 23 I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.(NIV) The LORD *brought* me forth as the first of his WORKS, ...(AMP) The Lord *formed* and brought me [Wisdom] forth at the beginning of His way, before His acts of old.(NLT) The LORD *formed* me from the beginning, before he created anything else.         Why do we see this theme over and over in the modern versions that Jesus Christ is just another created creature instead of the Creator Himself? Who would want to demote Jesus Christ like that? Hmmmmmm?9) WAS ADAM LITERAL?(KJV) Gen 2:19  And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.(NIV) Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creatur , that was its name. (NASB) Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. (ESV) So out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.(CEV) So the LORD took some soil and made animals and birds. He brought them to the man to see what names he would give each of them. Then the man named the tame animals and the birds and the wild animals. That&apos;s how they got their names. None of these was the right kind of partner for the man. (ASV) And out of the ground Jehovah God formed every beast of the field, and every bird of the heavens; and brought them unto the man to see what he would call them: and whatsoever the man called every living creature, that was the name thereof.        Now it&apos;s Adam who is omitted, which allows for interpreting him as a generic example of &amp;quot;mankind&amp;quot;.10) WAS MRS. ADAM LITERAL?(KJV) Gen 5:1-2  This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; 2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called THEIR NAME ADAM, in the day when they were created.        Remember, it was *Adam* who called her Eve, not God, but the modern versions don&apos;t call her anything here.(NIV) ... He created them male and female and blessed them. And when they were created, he called them &amp;quot;MAN&amp;quot;.(NASB) ... He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them MAN in the day when they were created. (NLT) ... He created them male and female, and he blessed them and called them &amp;quot;HUMAN.&amp;quot;(ESV) ... Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them MAN when they were created.(NKJV) ... He created them male and female, and blessed them and called them MANKIND in the day they were created.        Some of these are subtle changes, but they open the door to bigger changes. Besides, the serpent is the most subtle creature (Gen 3:1), so that&apos;s what we should expect.11) FIRSTBORN *OF* EVERY CREATURE, OR FIRST CREATED?(KJV) Col 1:15  Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn OF every creature:(NIV) ... firstborn over all creation. (NASB) ... firstborn of all CREATION. (AMP) ... Firstborn of all CREATION.(ESV) ... firstborn of all CREATION.(CEV) ... He is the FIRST-BORN Son, superior to all creation.(ASV) ... firstborn of all CREATION;        The KJV refers to His family/genealogical status as progenitor of all. The modern versions, again, make Him a created creature.12) THE FIRST DAY(KJV) Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.(NASB) ... And there was evening and there was morning, ONE day.(NLT) ... Together these made up ONE day.(AMP) ... And there was evening and there was morning, ONE day.(RSV) ... And there was evening and there was morning, ONE day.(ASV) ... And there was evening and there was morning, ONE day.         This is one of those subtle changes that can make a big difference. Many compromisers have tried to use the phrase &amp;quot;one day&amp;quot;, rather than &amp;quot;the first day&amp;quot; to try to justify day-age theories (it&apos;s still a stretch, but evolutionists will try anything, and a small step like this leads to worse renditions in newer versions). The New Living Translation goes a step farther and removes the phrase &amp;quot;the evening and the morning&amp;quot;, which makes it clear what the first day was. God said it was the &amp;quot;first day&amp;quot;, if there were millions of years, or hundreds, or one, or a month or a week before this, it was not really the &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;day, and God was innacurate. The modern version god can&apos;t count to one without getting it wrong. How can such a god be expected to preserve His entire word, or your soul? If your god is the impotent god of the modern versions, I suggest you trade him in for the real God, the omnipotent God, of the KJV.         Some versions, which I don&apos;t have available, say &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; day instead of &amp;quot;the nth day&amp;quot;, which also leaves the door open for other days than those mentioned.13) SAME ORIGIN(KJV) Hebrews 2:11 For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren,(RSV) For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified have all one ORIGIN. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brethren,(ESV) For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have one ORIGIN. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brothers.         There&apos;s a subtle, but important difference there. Of course the serpent was the most subtle of all creatures, so we know where the subtle changes come from. We are one in Christ, but we do not have the same origin - Christ has no origin (except in the modern versions). We have origins. The RSV and ESV have just brought Jesus Christ down to our mortal level. Go to Mark 10.14) BEGINNING OF CREATION(KJV) Mark 10:6 But from the *beginning* of the *creation* God made them male and female.(NLT) But God&apos;s PLAN was seen from the beginning of creation, for He made them male and female.(CEV) But in the beginning God made a man and a woman.(Worldwide English NT) From the TIME God first made people, he made them man and woman.         Seeing God&apos;s plan from the beginning doesn&apos;t necessarily mean that Adam and Eve were created then. One leaves out the beginning, the other leaves out the creation.15) MOST SUBTLE CREATUREMerriam-Webster: 1 a : DELICATE, ELUSIVE &lt;a subtle fragrance&gt; b : difficult to understand or perceive : OBSCURE &lt;subtle differences in sound&gt;        Subtle includes crafty, cunning, and shrewd, but what sets this word apart from the others is that something subtle is obscure, difficult to detect. It&apos;s a very minor thing that is hard to notice unless one looks close. Something or someone can be crafty, cunning, or shrewd, but can be easily observed to be so. If one is subtle, you will have a hard time noticing the difference. That&apos;s why sometimes apparently minor changes can have huge effects.(KJV) Gen 3:1  Now the serpent was more SUBTLE than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, YEA [???], hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?        Notice the serpent was the MOST SUBTLE beast God made. His first word was &amp;quot;Yea&amp;quot;, almost as if he was agreeing, but then his first act was to QUESTION God&apos;s word and try to get Eve to have DOUBT in what God said.        Knowing the serpent is subtle, if we exercise spiritual discernment circumspectly, we should EXPECT his changes to be very minor, but that they would cast doubt on God&apos;s word. If he jumped in and make many huge changes, people would be alarmed. So he makes minor, subtle changes. But subtle changes add up in over 400 English versions in the past 100 years.        Satan could never have gotten &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; to believe Jesus Christ is a created creature instead of the Creator Himself, but by changing a few verses here and there in different versions, bit-by-bit he eventually accomplishes that. The argument is usually that no major doctrine is missing altogether, and that&apos;s probably true. That&apos;s also EXACTLY the way we should expect the serpent to operate.(NIV) Now the serpent was more CRAFTY than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, &amp;quot;Did God really say, &apos;You must not eat from any tree in the garden&apos;?&amp;quot; (NASB) Now the serpent was more CRAFTY than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, &amp;quot;Indeed, has God said, &apos;You shall not eat from any tree of the garden&apos;?&amp;quot; (NLT) Now the serpent was the SHREWDEST of all the creatures the LORD God had made. &amp;quot;Really?&amp;quot; he asked the woman. &amp;quot;Did God really say you must not eat any of the fruit in the garden?&amp;quot;(ESV) Now the serpent was more CRAFTY than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, &amp;quot;Did God actually say, &apos;You shall not eat of any tree in the garden&apos;?&amp;quot;(CEV) The snake was SNEAKIER than any of the other wild animals that the LORD God had made. One day it came to the woman and asked, &amp;quot;Did God tell you not to eat fruit from any tree in the garden?&amp;quot; (NKJV) Now the serpent was more CUNNING than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, &amp;quot;Has God indeed said, &amp;quot;You shall not eat of every tree of the garden&apos;?&amp;quot; 16) FROM THE BEGINNING         Is God&apos;s word true from the BEGINNING? Do you believe the bible from cover to cover - especialy the cover. I&apos;m convinced the cover is the most important thing to belive. &amp;quot;Holy Bible&amp;quot; (that&apos;s assuming what&apos;s inside really is the Holy Bible, not a fake one guilty of false advertising). If you believe the cover, believing what&apos;s inside isn&apos;t a problem. The next most important part to believe is the first phrase, &amp;quot;In the beginning God&amp;quot;, and third, &amp;quot;God created&amp;quot;. If you can get that far, the rest of the Bible is little trouble. Most people cannot get past the cover or the first phrase.(KJV) Psa 119:160 Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.         Is it true from the BEGINNING of the Bible? Here&apos;s the BEGINNING:(KJV) Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.         Is this creation account of the BEGINNING, from the BEGINNING of the Bible, true in the modern versions?(NIV) All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal.         It&apos;s not true form the BEGINNING in the NIV. It says all of God&apos;s words, I&apos;ll give it that much credit, but are the beginning words God&apos;s words? Why won&apos;t the NIV say so?(NASB) The sum of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous ordinances is everlasting.         It&apos;s not true form the BEGINNING in the NASB. When did God start telling the truth if He wasn&apos;t in the beginning? The sum of God&apos;s word is called truth, but what about each word individually?(RSV) The sum of thy word is truth; and every one of thy righteous ordinances endures for ever.         Nor is God&apos;s word true from the BEGINNING in the RSV. No wonder the modern version proponents only think the &apos;message&apos; is important and not the specific words - that&apos;s what their versions teach! But we&apos;ve seen how damaging that is. Change the words and you do change the message.(NKJV) The entirety of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever.         Not even in the Nkjv!         Apparently the KJV is the only Bible that&apos;s true from the BEGINNING. It&apos;s the only Bible that will admit that its Genesis account from the BEGINNING is true. Both the creation account and the truth of scripture are weakened by the modern versions in this verse.         I&apos;m sure there are more verses pertaining to creation that are warped in the modern versions, but these few examples should be enough to cause any serious literal creationist Bible believer to avoid the modern versions and stick with the King James Bible.ALEXANDRIAN SEPTUAGINT        Here are more follies that appear in the texts that underlie the modern versions. The fact that they don&apos;t retain these glaring errors in their English versions indicate the blatant, utter corruption of the Alexandrian manuscripts and underscore the fact that the modern versions fail to translate their own texts correctly, so obviously corrupt are they.WRONG DAY!Gen 2:2 LXX has God ending His work on the SIXTH day instead of the SEVENTH.METHUSELAH SURVIVES FLOOD!See Gen. 5:28 for Lamech&apos;s age when he begat Noah. See Gen 7:6 for Noah&apos;s age when the flood began. See Gen 5:27 for Methuselah&apos;s age at death.Genesis 5:25 - Hebrew - Methuselah 187 years old at birth of Lamech LXX - Methuselah 167 years old at birth of LamechGenesis 5:28 - Hebrew - Lamech 182 years old at birth of son LXX - Lamech 188 years old at birth of son        According to the LXX, Methuselah was 167 years old at the birth of Lamech, and Lamech was 188 years old at the birth of Noah, and Noah was 600 years old at the start of the Deluge. Consequently, this would mean that Methuselah himself was 955 years old at the start of the Deluge. Now then, since Methuselah lived to be 969, this further means that - according to the LXX - METHUSELAH SURVIVED THE FLOOD by 14 years.PEE WEE GIANT!1 Sam 17:4 And there went out a champion out of the camp of the Philistines, named Goliath, of Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span.        The KJV has Goliath at SIX cubits and a span. An 18&amp;quot; cubit would make him over NINE feet tall.        The LXX has Goliath at FOUR cubits instead of six, making him just a tad over six feet tall.        Why in the world all of Israel would be scared to death of one man who wasn&apos;t tall enough to play in the NBA is unfathomable, but that&apos;s the situation in the LXX.1 Sam 9:2 And he had a son, whose name was Saul, a choice young man, and a goodly: and there was not among the children of Israel a goodlier person than he: from his shoulders and upward he was higher than any of the people.        As a young man, Saul was at least a good foot taller than anyone else around. That would make him likely between seven and eight feet tall. Why a warrior approaching eight feet in height would be afraid of a little six foot shrimp like the LXX Goliath is difficult to conceive. But the LXX is infested with such incredible lunacy.        What sane person, even a sane lost person, would adhere so fiercely to a text that has the soldier kill Christ (rather than Christ giving up the ghost willingly), that has death swallowed up in controversy instead of victory (just like the Bible debate, KJVOs have assurance and victory, modern versionists have confusion), has Methuselah survive Noah&apos;s flood, and cuts Goliath too short to play in the NBA?(LXX giant represented by a photo of Pee Wee Herman)Teno Groppi Bible Page: KJV Inspired? Pure and Sure word: King James Authorized Bible - The King of Books!
  • Carbon dating PHES p. 527

    1. 1. <ul><li>Don’t all scientists believe in Evolution? </li></ul><ul><li>Separation of church and state? </li></ul><ul><li>Stars? </li></ul><ul><li>Red Shift? </li></ul><ul><li>Sun shrinking? </li></ul><ul><li>Carbon Dating </li></ul><ul><li>Bad dates </li></ul><ul><li>K- Ar </li></ul><ul><li>Fresh Dinosaur bones? </li></ul><ul><li>Why so few human bones? </li></ul><ul><li>Pitch? </li></ul><ul><li>Primitive? </li></ul><ul><li>Pyramid </li></ul><ul><li>Was the earth hot? </li></ul>Global warming? Green River? Mars rock? Theistic evolution Other religions contradictions? Why King James? Bible Codes What are the Chemtrails ? Who Created God? 7A
    2. 2. <ul><li>Was there death before sin? </li></ul><ul><li>Days before the sun? </li></ul><ul><li>Mr . Flat </li></ul><ul><li>Races?* </li></ul><ul><li>What about cloning? </li></ul><ul><li>poisonous snakes? </li></ul><ul><li>Ark of the covenant?* </li></ul><ul><li>Big Foot* </li></ul><ul><li>Nephilim ? </li></ul><ul><li>Bible Codes? </li></ul><ul><li>UFO’S </li></ul><ul><li>How long in the Garden? </li></ul><ul><li>Mark of Beast </li></ul><ul><li>Shroud of Turin? </li></ul>courses on creation? Do you have a PhD ?* Symbiosis evolve? Giant Insects? Sun Shrinking? Red Sea Crossing Sodom? Unicorn? wisdom teeth Gaps in Genealogies 7B
    3. 3. EVANGELISM O DE CIENCIA CREACIONISTA Seminario Parte 7a : Las Preguntas y Las Contestas Lecci ó n 1 4 de 1 5 . Un Seminario de Creación Por Dr. Kent Hovind 29 Cummings Road Pensacola, FL 32503 850-479-3466 www.drdino.com Correo Electronico : dino@drdino.com
    4. 4. I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things, Eclesiastés 7:25 Yo he rodeado con mi corazón por saber, y examinar, é inquirir la sabiduría, y la razón;
    5. 5. But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: 1 Pedro 3:15 Mas santificad al Señor Dios en vuestros corazones y estad siempre aparejados para responder a cada uno que os demanda razón de la esperanza que está en vosotros; con mansedumbre y temor;
    6. 6. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. II Tim 2:15 2 Timoteo 2:15 Estudia con diligencia presentarte a Dios aprobado, obrero que no tiene de qué avergonzarse, que traza bien la palabra de verdad. Nota: Algunas versiones en Español dicen “Procura.”
    7. 7. Don’t all scientists believe in evolution?
    8. 8. 1. All scientists do not believe in evolution. 2. Even if they did that is not how truth is established. 3. History has shown that the majority is often wrong.
    9. 9. Geocentric vs Heliocentric The “majority” of scientists taught that the sun circles the earth, Majority opinion proves nothing! Wrong!
    10. 10. Weights falling from Pisa Tower The “majority” of scientists taught that that heavy objects fall faster. Majority opinion proves nothing! Wrong!
    11. 11. In 1799 George Washington was bled twice by his doctors before he died. They believed in the doctrine of humors. Wrong! 21
    12. 12. Many of the people therefore, when they heard this saying, said, Of a truth this is the Prophet. Others said, This is the Christ. But some said, Shall Christ come out of Galilee? Hath not the scripture said, That Christ cometh of the seed of David, and out of the town of Bethlehem, where David was? Juan 7:40-42 Entonces muchos del pueblo oyendo este dicho, decían: Verdaderamente éste es el Profeta. Otros decían: Este es el Cristo....
    13. 13. Juan 7: 40-42 Algunos empero decían: ¿De Galilea ha de venir el Cristo? ¿No ha dicho la escritura: Que de la simiente de David, y de la aldea de Bethlehem, de donde era David, vendrá el Cristo? Hovind translation: They are arguing about the wrong subject !
    14. 14. So there was a division among the people because of him. And some of them would have taken him; but no man laid hands on him. If you don’t like someone’s teaching, eliminate them! Kill the messenger ! Si no le gusta a la enseñanza de alguien, ¡eliminarlo! ¡Mate al mensajero! Así que había disensión entre el pueblo a causa de él. Y algunos de ellos le querían prender ; mas ninguno le echó sobre él mas manos. Juan 7: 43-44
    15. 15. Then came the officers to the chief priests and Pharisees; and they said unto them, Why have ye not brought him? The officers answered, Never man spake like this man. Y los esbirros vinieron a los príncipes de los sacerdotes, y a los Fariseos; y ellos les dijeron: ¿Por qué no le trajisteis? Los esbirros respondieron: Nunca así ha hablado hombre, como este hombre. The professors sent their students to take the heretic but did not go themselves. Use the law to silence those who disagree. J ua n 7:45-46 Los profesores enviaron a sus estudiantes para tomar el hereje, peron no se fueron. Usan la ley para silenciar ellos que no son de acuerdo.
    16. 16. Then answered them the Pharisees, Are ye also deceived? [Are you stupid?] Have any of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed on him? Entonces los Fariseos les repondieron: ¿Sois también vosotros engañados? [ ¿Estas tonto? ] ¿Ha creído en él alguno de los príncipes, o de los Fariseos? J ua n 7:47-48 ( All scientists believe evolution-scientific journals don’t publish creation articles ) (Todos los científicos creen los periódicos evolucionistos, pero no publican nada de creación)
    17. 17. “ But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed.” Mas esta gente común que no sabe la ley, malditos son. Hovind translation: “We have knowledge, you don’t. We don’t approve of your degree. You are ignorant if you don’t believe evolution!” Juan 7:49 Traducción de Hovind: “Tenemos sabiduria, y usted no tiene. No aprobamos de su educación. ¡Usted es ignorante si no crees en la evolución!”
    18. 18. Nicodemus saith unto them, … Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth? They answered and said unto him, Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet. And every man went unto his own house. Díceles Nicodemo, … ¿Juzga nuestra ley a hombre alguno , si primero no oyere de él , y entendiere lo que hace? Respondieron y dijéronle: ¿Eres tú también de Galilea? Escudriña, y ve, que de Galilea nunca se levantó profeta. Y se fue cada uno a su casa. Even some non-believers have sense enough to listen to reason and think about the other side. Go home and think about it! Juan 7:50-53 Algunos inconversos tienen tanto sabidura en escuchar y pensar lo que enseña el otro lado. ¡Vaya a casa para pensar en esto!
    19. 19. Since the Pharisees had not believed on him that was used as “proof” He was not right.- “ Has he published in major science journals?” They started with a false assumption that Jesus was from Galilee.
    20. 20. The “majority” voted not to go in to the promised land. Numbers 32. The “majority” followed false gods many times in the OT. (Judges 2, etc.) The “majority” followed Aaron into rebellion in Ex. 32.
    21. 21. The “majority” of the world hates Christians. The “majority” of religious leaders hated Jesus.
    22. 22. Also, many thousands of scientists do believe in Creation. See: ICR.ORG. Often they are afraid to be very vocal about it for fear of losing their jobs or grant money. ie. Dr. Robert Gentry
    23. 23. Roger DeHart, science teacher at Burlington-Edison high school near Seattle, WA was told he could not inform students of errors in the textbooks by passing out articles from current science journals. *
    24. 24. Kevin Haley, (541-382-2278) biology teacher at Central Oregon Community College, Bend, Oregon lost his job for exposing errors in the textbooks. See World magazine (800-951-6397) June 24, 2000, p. 23.
    25. 25. Baylor University in Waco, TX fired William Dembski in April 2000 because he advocated “intelligent design”. News Herald 11-11-2000 Panama City
    26. 26. Forrest Mims was a science writer for 20 years. He published in National Geographic, Science Digest, The American Journal of Physics and 60 magazines and newspapers. He was denied a job as writer for Scientific American because he was a creationist. New York Times Oct 24, 1990
    27. 27. 8-15-2000 Rod LaVake-Faribault, MN *
    28. 28. Teacher Dan Clark was told by Lafayette, Indiana school superintendent Ed Eller not to introduce creationism to his class, Indianapolis Star, Sept. 23, 2001. The citizens in that county need to help Mr. Eller find a new job!
    29. 29. Indianapolis Star, Sept. 23, 2001
    30. 31. Dean Kenyon, co-author of this book, taught biology at San Francisco State University. He wrote books about evolution. In 1993 he was removed from his teaching position because he raised doubts about evolution.
    31. 32. This is the third criteria for receiving a letter of recommendation from Dr. Dini to pursue a career in medicine. Criterion 3 “ If you set up an appointment to discuss the writing of a letter of recommendation, I will ask you: ‘How do you think the human species originated?’ If you cannot truthfully and forthrightly affirm a scientific answer to this question, then you should not seek my recommendation for admittance to further education in the biomedical sciences. Why do I ask this question? Let’s consider the situation of one wishing to enter medical school. Whereas medicine is historically rooted first in the practice of magic and later in religion, modern medicine is an endeavor that springs from the sciences, biology first among these. The central, unifying principle of biology is the theory of evolution, which includes both micro- and macro- evolution, and which extends to ALL
    32. 33. species. How can someone who does not accept the most important theory in biology expect to properly practice in a field that is so heavily based on biology? It is hard to imagine how this can be so, but it is easy to imagine how physicians who ignore or neglect the Darwinian aspects of medicine or the evolutionary origin of humans can make bad clinical decisions. The current crisis in antibiotic resistance is the result of such decisions. For others, please read the citations below. Good medicine, like good biology, is based on the collection and evaluation of physical evidence. So much physical evidence supports the evolution of humans from non-human ancestors that one can validly refer to the “fact” of human evolution, even if all of the details are not yet known. One can deny this evidence only at the risk of calling into question one’s understanding of science and of the method of science. Such an individual has committed malpractice
    33. 34. regarding the method of science, for good scientists would never throw out data that do not conform to their expectations or beliefs. This is the situation of those who deny the evolution of humans; such a one is throwing out information because it seems to contradict his/her cherished beliefs. Can a physician ignore data that s/he does not like and remain a physician for long? No. If modern medicine is based on the method of science, then how can someone who denies the theory of evolution -- the very pinnacle of modern biological science -- ask to be recommended into a scientific profession by a professional scientist? If you still want to make an appointment, you can do so in person during office hours (M-Th, 3:30-4:00), or by phoning my office at 742-2729, or by e-mailing me at michael.dini@ttacs.ttu.edu” Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
    34. 35. The students at Texas Tech offered Mr. Dini $1,000 if he would debate me when I spoke in Lubbock, TX in Feb. 2003. He refused! 806-742-2729, michael.dini@ttacs.ttu.edu. Professors are often brave in front of their students where they have an obvious academic and psychological advantage but I have had over 3000 professors refuse to debate me. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
    35. 36. Thursday, January 30, 2003 DALLAS — A biology professor who refuses to write letters of recommendation for his students if they don't believe in evolution is being accused of religious discrimination, and federal officials are investigating, the school said. The legal complaint was filed against Texas Tech University and professor Michael Dini by a student and the Liberty Legal Institute, a religious freedom group that calls Dini's policy &quot;open religious bigotry.&quot; &quot;Students are being denied recommendations not because of their competence in understanding evolution, but solely because of their personal religious beliefs,&quot; said Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel for the institute. The Department of Justice asked Texas Tech in Jan. 21 letter to respond to the allegations, university officials said. Texas Tech spokeswoman Cindy Rugeley said that the university stands by Dini, and that his policies do not conflict with those of Texas Tech. &quot;A letter of recommendation is a personal matter between a professor and student and is not subject to the university control or regulation,&quot; Texas Tech Chancellor David Smith wrote in October in response to an earlier letter of complaint. Dini, an associate professor who has been at Texas Tech for 10 years, said Wednesday he didn't know about a federal inquiry. He referred questions about his policy to a Web page that outlines it. The Web page advises students seeking a recommendation to be prepared to answer the question: &quot;How do you think the human species originated?&quot; &quot;If you cannot truthfully and forthrightly affirm a scientific answer to this question, then you should not seek my recommendation for admittance to further education in the biomedical sciences,&quot; Dini writes. The legal complaint began with Texas Tech student Micah Spradling, who withdrew from Dini's class and the university in the fall and enrolled at Lubbock Christian University after learning about Dini's policy. Spradling, 22, wants to become a physician and said he needed a letter of recommendation from a biology professor but, as a creationist, he said he couldn't &quot;sit there and truthfully say I believe in human evolution.&quot; &quot;It's a theory. You read about it in textbooks. I could explain the process, maybe how some people say it happens, but I could not have said ... I believe in it,&quot; Spradling said Wednesday. &quot;I really don't see how believing in the evolution of humanity has anything to do with patient care or studying science.&quot; Spradling re-enrolled at Texas Tech this semester, after obtaining a recommendation letter at the other school. Dini writes that he has the policy because he doesn't believe anyone should practice in a biology-related field without accepting &quot;the most important theory in biology.&quot; &quot;Good scientists would never throw out data that do not conform to their expectations or beliefs,&quot; he writes. Dini also says he refuses to write letters of recommendation for students he doesn't know fairly well and those who haven't earned an &quot;A&quot; in one of his classes. Department spokesman Jorge Martinez refused to not confirm or deny an investigation, citing department policy. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77075,00.html *
    36. 37. PURCELLVILLE -- Patrick Henry College was notified on November 13 that it had received initial accreditation by the American Academy for Liberal Education. The board of AALE granted the College “preaccreditation” status at its November 2nd meeting. This status is the standard path of official sanction for new institutions. AALE had denied accreditation to PHC last April because of its views on creationism. That denial led to an administrative appeal before an outside panel of college administrators selected by AALE. The appellate panel reversed the initial denial and remanded the decision to the AALE Board for reconsideration. The panel rejected the view that a college that teaches creationism fails to adequately teach the sciences. But the appellate panel left open the question of whether Patrick Henry allows full discussion of alternative views of origins. PHC has contended from the beginning that it allows and welcomes full discussion of opposing views while ultimately teaching that six-day creationism is the truth. The PHC Board of Trustees amended its Statement of Biblical Worldview to clarify that the college truly intends for all viewpoints to be discussed adequately. PHC did not amend its statements regarding its affirmation of the truth of six-day creationism. The AALE Board of Trustees cited this clarification in granting accreditation. “ We are thankful that we were able to work this out with AALE. We have always believed that it is possible to be strongly committed to the truth of God's Word and yet be open for discussion in the tradition of classical liberal education,” Michael Farris, President of Patrick Henry College, said today. “ We are very heartened by the action of AALE and look forward to working with them in the future,” Farris added. MEDIA CONTACT: Leslie Sillars, (540) 338-1776 Patrick Henry College, P.O. Box 1776, Purcellville, VA 20134 (540) 338-1776,http://www.phc.edu, info@phc.edu
    37. 38. Professor Dumped Over Evolution Beliefs By Ed Vitagliano March 11, 2003 (AgapePress) - A university professor said she was asked to resign for introducing elite students to flaws in Darwinian thought, and she now says academic freedom at her school is just a charade. During a recent honors forum at Mississippi University for Women (MUW), Dr. Nancy Bryson gave a presentation titled “Critical Thinking on Evolution” -- which covered alternate views to evolution such as intelligent design. Bryson said that following the presentation, a senior professor of biology told her she was unqualified and not a professional biologist, and said her presentation was “religion masquerading as science.” The next day, Vice President of Academic Affairs, Dr. Vagn Hansen asked Bryson to resign from her position as head of the school’s Division of Science and Mathematics. “ The academy is all about free thought and academic freedom. He hadn’t even heard my talk,” Bryson told American Family Radio News. “[W]ithout knowing anything about my talk, he makes that decision. I think it’s just really an outrage.” Bryson believes she was punished for challenging evolutionary thought and said she hopes her dismissal will smooth the way for more campus debate on the theory of evolution. University counsel Perry Sansing said MUW will not comment on why Bryson was asked to resign because it is a personnel matter. “ The best reaction,” Bryson says, “and the most encouraging reaction I have received has been from the students.” She added that the students who have heard the talk, “They have been so enthusiastically supportive of me.” Bryson has contacted the American Family Association Center for Law and Policy and is considering taking legal action against the school. Headlines.agapepress.org/archive/3/112002a
    38. 39. Francis Bacon (1561–1626) Scientific method Johann Kepler (1571–1630) Scientific astronomy Athanasius Kircher (1601–1680) Inventor John Wilkins (1614–1672) Walter Charleton (1619–1707) President of the Royal College of Physicians Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) Hydrostatics; Barometer Sir William Petty (1623 –1687) Statistics; Scientific economics Robert Boyle (1627–1691) Chemistry; Gas dynamics John Ray (1627–1705) Natural history Isaac Barrow (1630–1677) Professor of Mathematics Nicolas Steno (1631–1686) Stratigraphy Thomas Burnet (1635–1715) Geology Increase Mather (1639–1723) Astronomy Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712) Medical Doctor, Botany These scientists believed in creation : Los siguientes científicos creyeron en la creación:
    39. 40. Isaac Newton (1642–1727) Dynamics; Calculus; Gravitation law; Reflecting telescope (wrote more about the Bible than science, and emphatically affirmed a Creator, but it’s likely he held heretical anti-Trinitarian views) Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz (1646–1716) Mathematician John Flamsteed (1646–1719) Greenwich Observatory Founder; Astronomy William Derham (1657–1735) Ecology Cotton Mather (1662–1727) Physician John Harris (1666–1719) Mathematician John Woodward (1665–1728) Paleontology
    40. 41. William Whiston (1667–1752) Physics, Geology John Hutchinson (1674–1737) Paleontology Johathan Edwards (1703–1758) Physics, Meteorology Carolus Linneaus (1707–1778) Taxonomy; Biological classification system Jean Deluc (1727–1817) Geology Richard Kirwan (1733–1812) Mineralogy William Herschel (1738–1822) Galactic astronomy; Uranus (probably believed in an old-earth)
    41. 42. John Dalton (1766–1844) Atomic theory; Gas law, Father of the Modern Atomic Theory; Chemistry Timothy Dwight (1752–1817) Educator William Kirby (1759–1850) Entomologist Jedidian Horse (1761–1826) Geographer Benjamin Barton (1766–1815) Botanist; Zoologist Georges Cuvier (1769–1832) Comparative anatomy (old-earth compromiser) Samuel Miller (1770–1840) Clergy Charles Bell (1774–1842) Anatomist
    42. 43. John Kidd (1775–1851) Chemistry Humphrey Davy (1778–1829) Thermokinetics; Safety lamp Benjamin Silliman (1779–1864) Mineralogist (old-earth compromiser) Peter Mark Roget (1779–1869) Physician; Physiologist Thomas Chalmers (1780–1847) Professor (old-earth compromiser) David Brewster (1781–1868) Optical mineralogy, Kaleidoscope (probably believed in an old-earth) William Buckland (1784–1856) Geologist (old-earth compromiser)
    43. 44. William Prout (1785–1850) Food chemistry (probably believed in an old-earth) Adam Sedgwick (1785–1873) Geology (old-earth compromiser) Michael Faraday (1791–1867) Electro magnetics; Field theory, Generator Samuel F. B. Morse (1791–1872) Telegraph Charles Babbage (1792–1871) Operations research; Computer science; Ophthalmoscope (old-earth compromiser) John Herschel (1792–1871) Astronomy (old-earth compromiser) Edward Hitchcock (1793–1864) Geology (old-earth compromiser)
    44. 45. William Whewell (1794–1866) Anemometer (old-earth compromiser) Joseph Henry (1797–1878) Electric motor; Galvanometer Richard Owen (1804–1892) Zoology; Paleontology Matthew Maury (1806–1873) Oceanography, Hydrography (probably believed in an old-earth) Louis Agassiz (1807–1873) Glaciology, Ichthyology Henry Rogers (1808–1866) Geology John Murray (1808–1892) Publisher
    45. 46. James Glaisher (1809–1903) Meteorology Philip H. Gosse (1810–1888) Ornithologist; Zoology Sir Henry Rawlinson (1810–1895) Archeologist James Simpson (1811–1870) Gynecology, Anesthesiology James Dana (1813–1895) Geology Sir Joseph Henry Gilbert (1817–1901) Agricultural Chemist James Joule (1818–1889) Thermodynamics Thomas Anderson (1819–1874) Chemist Charles Piazzi Smyth (1819–1900) Astronomy
    46. 47. George Stokes (1819–1903) Fluid Mechanics John William Dawson (1820–1899) Geology Rudolph Virchow (1821–1902) Pathology Gregor Mendel (1822–1884) Genetics Louis Pasteur (1822–1895) Bacteriology, Biochemistry; Sterilization; Immunization Henri Fabre (1823–1915) Entomology of living insects William Thompson-Lord Kelvin (1824–1907) Energetics; Absolute temperatures; Trans-Atlantic cable William Huggins (1824–1910) Astral spectrometry
    47. 48. Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866) Non-Euclidean geometries Joseph Lister (1827–1912) Antiseptic surgery Balfour Stewart (1828–1887) Ionospheric electricity James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879) Electrodynamics; Statistical thermodynamics P. G. Tait (1831–1901) Vector analysis John Bell Pettigrew (1834–1908) Anatomist; Physiologist John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh (1842–1919) Similitude; Model Analysis; Inert Gases Sir William Abney (1843–1920) Astronomy
    48. 49. Alexander MacAlister (1844–1919) Anatomy A. H. Sayce (1845–1933) Archeologist George Romanes (1848–1894) Biology; Physiology John Ambrose Fleming (1849–1945) Electronics; Electron tube; Thermionic valve Dr Clifford Burdick, Geologist George Washington Carver (1864–1943) Inventor L. Merson Davies (1890–1960) Geology; Paleontology Douglas Dewar (1875–1957) Ornithologist Howard A. Kelly (1858–1943) Gynecology
    49. 50. Paul Lemoine (1878–1940) Geology Dr Frank Marsh, Biology Edward H. Maunder (1851–1928) Astronomy William Mitchell Ramsay (1851–1939) Archeologist William Ramsay (1852–1916) Isotopic chemistry, Element transmutation Charles Stine (1882–1954) Organic Chemist A. Rendle-Short (1885–1955) Surgeon Wernher von Braun (1912–1977) Space Scientist Sir Cecil P. G. Wakeley (1892–1979) Surgeon Arthur E. Wilder-Smith (1915–1995) Three science doctorates; a creation science pioneer Prof. Verna Wright Rheumatologist (deceased 1997)
    50. 51. Some ill informed scoffers teach that all scientists believe in evolution. This is simply not true. There are many thousands of scientists today that believe in creation.
    51. 52. “ Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the forward to the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species in 1959)
    52. 53. “ Evolution is not a fact. Evolution doesn’t even qualify as a theory or as a hypothesis. It is a metaphysical research program, and it is not really testable science.” Dr. Karl Popper-leading philosopher of science.
    53. 54. “ I suppose the reason was why we leapt at the Origin of species was that the idea of God interfered with our sexual morés” Sir Julian Huxley - Head of UNESCO - One of the World’s leading evolutionists was asked in a Television Interview why did the scientific community jump at Darwin’s ideas?
    54. 55. Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion -- a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaint -- and Mr. Gish is but one of many to make it -- the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today. Dr. Michael Ruse, professor of philosophy and zoology at the University of Guelph Www.omniology.com/HowEvolutionBecameReligion
    55. 56. “ Evolution is a fairy tale for grownups. The theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Professor Louis Bounoure Director of the Strasbourg Zoological Museum
    56. 57. <ul><li>Nearly all branches of science were started by creationists. </li></ul><ul><li>Evolution theory has added nothing to the advancement of science- it is a useless theory. </li></ul><ul><li>When students or professors fear expressing their conclusions under threat of being flunked, demoted, fired or ostracized- science is suppressed. </li></ul><ul><li>Any advancements in technology have nothing to do with evolution theory. </li></ul><ul><li>Evolution is hindering the growth of the sciences. </li></ul>
    57. 58. What about separation of church and state? Can creation or the Bible be discussed in public schools?
    58. 59. Thomas Jefferson used it in a letter to Messrs. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, and Stephen S. Nelson, a Committee of the Danbury Association in Danbury, CT (Baptist) in Dayton, Conn. in 1802. There is no such phrase mentioned in the constitution.
    59. 60. “ The First Amendment has erected a wall of separation between church and state.” Thomas Jefferson That wall is a one dimensional wall. It keeps government from running the church but it makes sure that Christian principles will always stay in government. see:wallbuilders.com (817) 441-6044 See seminar part 4 for much more on this topic.
    60. 61. Paul Lemoine (1878–1940) Geology Dr Frank Marsh, Biology Edward H. Maunder (1851–1928) Astronomy William Mitchell Ramsay (1851–1939) Archeologist William Ramsay (1852–1916) Isotopic chemistry, Element transmutation Charles Stine (1882–1954) Organic Chemist A. Rendle-Short (1885–1955) Surgeon Wernher von Braun (1912–1977) Space Scientist Sir Cecil P. G. Wakeley (1892–1979) Surgeon Arthur E. Wilder-Smith (1915–1995) Three science doctorates; a creation science pioneer Prof. Verna Wright Rheumatologist (deceased 1997)
    61. 62. ¿ C òmo podemos ver las estrellas que estàn billones de años luz de distancia si el universo solo tiene 6,000 años ? How can we see stars billions of light years away if the universe is only 6,000 years old?
    62. 63. h
    63. 64. Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee. Nehemiah 9:6 Tú, oh SEÑOR , eres solo; tú hiciste los cielos, y los cielos de los cielos , y toda su milicia, la tierra y todo lo que está en ella, los mares y todo lo que hay en ellos; y tú vivificas todas estas cosas, y los ejércitos de los cielos te adoran. - Nehemías 9:6
    64. 65. Super Nova Astrònomos han observado que cada 30 años una estrella ´´muere´´ y explota en un super nova Astronomers have observed that about every 30 years a star “dies” and explodes into a super nova.* Si el universo tiene billones de años, por què hay menos de 300 super novas (estrellas muertas)? If the universe is billions of years old, how come there are less than 300 super nova (dead stars)? There should be several hundred million of them. Are the stars wrong, or the evolution theory? *ICR September, 1998
    65. 66. Si las estrellas evolucionan, el nacimiento de estrellas y la muerte de estrellas debe ser igual. Novas y supernovas son la muerte de estrellas. Muchos se han observado. Dònde està la evidencia para el nacimiento de estrellas? If stars evolve, star births should equal star deaths. Novas and supernovas are star deaths. Many have been observed. Where is the evidence for star births?
    66. 67. If stars evolve, star births should equal star deaths. Novas and supernovas are star deaths. Many have been observed. Where is the evidence for star births? Holt Physical Sci. 2001, P. 539
    67. 68. “ La vergüenza silenciosa de la a stro fìsica moderna es que no sabemos como una de estas estrellas pudieron formar .” “ The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form.” Martin Harwit, Science , vol. 231, 7 March 1986, p. 1201-1202
    68. 70. Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days, and years…. And He made the stars also Génesis 1:16 Sean lumbreras en la expansión de los cielos para apartar el día y la noche: y sean por señales, y para las estaciones , y para días y años; … hizo también las estrellas .
    69. 71. He counts the number of the stars; He gives names to all of them. Salmos 147:4 El cuenta el número de las estrellas ; A todas ellas llama por sus nombres.
    70. 72. Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. Salmos 148:4 Alabadle, cielos de los cielos, Y las aguas que están sobre los cielos.
    71. 73. Who layeth the beams of his chambers in the waters: who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the wind: Ps. 104:3 Que establece sus aposentos entre las aguas ; El que pone las nubes por su carroza, El que anda sobre las alas del viento; - Salmos 104:3 The voice of the LORD is upon the waters: the God of glory thundereth: the LORD is upon many waters. Psalm 29:3 Voz de l SEÑOR sobre las aguas : Hizo tronar el Dios de gloria: el SEÑOR sobre las muchas aguas. - Salmos 29:3
    72. 74. It’s been estimated that there are enough stars for every individual on earth to own 11 trillion of them. (2003) Se ha estimado que hay suficientes estrellas en el cielo para que cada persona en la tierra sea dueño de 11,000,000,000,000 (11 trilliones) de ellas.
    73. 75. H U B B L E S P A C E T E L E S C O P E
    74. 76. Continuous Viewing Zone An area 1/30 the size of the full moon, or about the size of a grain of sand held at arms length, was stared at for ten straight days.
    75. 77. ¡ M às estrellas fueron vistas en esta pequeña àrea que podìan contar! More stars were seen in this small area than could be counted!
    76. 78. “ Stars are so far away that they appear to us to be just pinpoints of light. We cannot see their size or shape. So how can we tell different types of stars apart? For the vast majority of stars, there is only one characteristic feature that we can observe—the color of their light.” Hawking, Stephen W., A Brief History of Time (New York: Bantam Books, 1988) p.37
    77. 79. Known distance Unknown distance Simple trigonometry can figure distances within limits. Sine=Opp/Hyp Cos=Adj/Hyp Tan=Opp/Adj
    78. 80. 8000 miles
    79. 81. Merrill Earth Science 1993 p. 631 Earth in June 93,000,000 miles = 1 AU =8 light minutes. Earth in January
    80. 82. Merrill Earth Science 1993 p. 631 Earth in June 186,000,000 miles = 2 AU =16 light minutes. Earth in January
    81. 83. Earth’s orbit around the sun is 16 light minutes across. 1 Year = 525,948.76 minutes Earth’s orbit
    82. 84. 16 inches 525,948 inches or 8.3 miles .
    83. 85. Earth’s orbit around the sun is 16 light minutes across. 1 Year = 525,948 minutes A one light year triangle has an angle of .017 degrees. To measure the distance to a star 100 light years away, they must measure an angle of .00017 degrees. This would be like keeping the surveyors 16 inches apart and moving the 3rd point 830 miles away.
    84. 86. Chicago, Illinois Measuring a distance 15 billion light years away is impossible! This is like having two surveyors, 16 inches apart, looking at a dot in Chicago and calculating the distance!
    85. 87. Merrill Earth Science 1993 p. 631 Earth in June Can you tell exactly where you were 6 months ago? Earth in January
    86. 88. Parallax can measure less than 100 light years.
    87. 89. Stellar Distances “ This accuracy will enable SIM to determine stellar distances… to 10% accuracy out to a distance of 482,000 million, million miles. This is an improvement of several hundred times over what is possible today.” (This is only 82,000 light years!) Space Iterferometry Mission, Jet Propulsion Laboratory www.planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/SIM/sim_stellarDistances.html, July 1, 2004
    88. 90. Stellar Distances “ This accuracy will enable SIM to determine stellar distances… to 10% accuracy out to a distance of 482,000 million, million miles. This is an improvement of several hundred times over what is possible today.” (This is 82,000 light years!) Space Iterferometry Mission, Jet Propulsion Laboratory www.planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/SIM/sim_stellarDistances.html July 1, 2004 The Milky Way is estimated to be 100,000 LY across. SIM now allows us to measure 82% of the distance across.
    89. 91. Ahora podemos medir parte de una pequeña galaxìa. ¡Gran cosa ! ¡Què gran Dios servimos! We can now measure part way across one little galaxy. Big deal! What a mighty God we serve!
    90. 92. 1. Scientists cannot measure distances beyond 100 light years accurately. 2. No one knows what light is nor that it always travels the same speed throughout time space and matter. Things to consider concerning starlight.
    91. 93. Matter Black Hole
    92. 94. FEB 18,1999 Houston Chronicle, page 10A; ran an article about a Danish Physicist, Dr. Hau working at Harvard, being able to slow down light by cooling it. They cool it to fifty-billionths of a degree above absolute zero -459.67. The light was slowed down to 38 MPH ! In Dallas Morning News 2-28-2000 the article says they have now slowed it to 1 MPH! See also, New Scientist, July 24, 1999 pp. 28-32 See Science News June 9, 1984, p.359 for more on gravity effecting light. Slowed to 39 MPH
    93. 95. Scientists Bring Light To Full Stop, Hold It, Then Send It On Its Way By James Glanz www.nytimes.com/2001/01/18/science/18LIGH 1-18-01 Researchers say they have slowed light to a dead stop, stored it and then released it as if it were an ordinary material particle. The achievement is a landmark feat that, by reining in nature’s swiftest and most ethereal form of energy for the first time, could help realize what are now theoretical concepts for vastly increasing the speed of computers and the security of communications.
    94. 96. Two independent teams of physicists have achieved the result, one led by Dr. Lene Vestergaard Hau of Harvard University and the Rowland Institute for Science in Cambridge, Mass., and the other by Dr. Ronald L. Walsworth and Dr. Mikhail D. Lukin of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, also in Cambridge. *
    95. 97. “ Physicists Briefly Freeze Pulse of Light” “ We have succeeded in holding a light pulse still without taking all the energy away from it.” said Mikhall D. Lukin, a Harvard physicist. Fox News Channel Wed. Dec. 10, 2003
    96. 98. Eureka! Scientists break speed of light Jonathan Leake, Science Editor Sunday Times [UK] June 4, 2000 UNITED STATES “ SCIENTISTS claim they have broken the ultimate speed barrier: the speed of light. In research carried out in the United States, particle physicists have shown that light pulses can be accelerated to up to 300 times their normal velocity of 186,000 miles per second. The work was carried out by Dr Lijun Wang, of the NEC research institute in Princeton, who transmitted a pulse of light towards a chamber filled with specially treated cesium gas.” See also; New York Times May, 30, 2000 www.nytimes.com *
    97. 99. During the last 300 years, at least 164 separate measurements of the speed of light have been published. Sixteen different measurement techniques were used. “ The speed of light has apparently decreased so rapidly that experimental error cannot explain it!” Astronomer Barry Setterfield The Atomic Constants, Light, and Time 1987 also www.millennium-ark.net
    98. 100. Speed of light has decayed. Creation Tech. Journal, June, 2000
    99. 101. The atomic clock. In 1956, following several years of work, two astronomers at the U. S. Naval Observatory (USNO) and two astronomers at the National Physical Laboratory (Teddington, England) determined the relationship between the frequency of the Cesium atom (the standard of time) and the rotation of the Earth at a particular epoch. As a result, they defined the second of atomic time as the length of time required for 9 192 631 770 cycles of the Cesium atom at zero magnetic field. The second thus defined was equivalent to the second defined by the fraction 1 / 31 556 925.9747 of the year 1900.
    100. 102. What do the Evolutionists say? “ The speed of light was ten billion times faster at time zero!” Dr. V.S. Troitskii, Cosmologist at the Radio-physical Research Institute in Gorky. “Physical Constants and the Evolution of the Universe” Astrophysics and Space Science , Vol. 139, No. 2, December 1987 pp 389-411.
    101. 103. “ No physical law prevents anything from exceeding the speed of light. In two published experiments, The speed of light was apparently exceeded by as much as a factor of 100!” 1. “Thirty Six Nanoseconds Faster Than Light” Electronics and Wireless World 1988 pp 1162-1165 2. “Faster Than Light?” Radio-Electronics pp 55-58. Also – “New Scientist” April 1, 1995; pp 26-29 “ Faster Than What” Newsweek June 19, 1995 p 67-69
    102. 105. What do the Evolutionists say? “ A shocking possibility is that the speed of light might change in time during the life of the universe.” Dr. Joao Magueijo of Imperial College London www.Sunday-times.co.uk 12-24- 2000
    103. 106. See also: Constant Changes, Science News, Oct. 6, 2001 p. 222
    104. 107. Inconstant Speed of Light May Debunk Einstein Wed Aug 7, 2002, 2:07 PM ET By Michael Christie SYDNEY (Reuters) - A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed of light may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat one of the most cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein’s theory of relativity. The team, led by theoretical physicist Paul Davies of Sydney’s Macquarie University, say it is possible that the speed of light has slowed over billions of years. If so, physicists will have to rethink many of their basic ideas about the laws of the universe. “That means giving up the theory of relativity and E=mc 2 and all that sort of stuff,” Davies told Reuters. “But of course it doesn’t mean we just throw the books in the bin, because it’s in the nature of scientific revolution that the old theories become incorporated in the new ones.” Davies, and astrophysicists Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the University of New South Wales published the proposal in the August 8 edition of scientific journal Nature.
    105. 108. Inconstant Speed of Light May Debunk Einstein Wed Aug 7, 2002, 2:07 PM ET By Michael Christie The suggestion that the speed of light can change is based on data collected by UNSW astronomer John Webb, who posed a conundrum when he found that light from a distant quasar, a star-like object, had absorbed the wrong type of photons from interstellar clouds on its 12 billion year journey to earth. Davies said fundamentally Webb’s observations meant that the structure of atoms emitting quasar light was slightly but ever so significantly different to the structure of atoms in humans. The discrepancy could only be explained if either the electron charge, or the speed of light, had changed.
    106. 109. September 20, 2002 Light-Speed Debate Impacts Origins Theories By Stuart Shepard, correspondent The speed limit of the cosmos is being questioned, and the implications for theories of the origins of the universe are huge. A debate over the speed of light may actually shed some light on ideas about the creation of the universe and scientific theory. Passing light speed is standard fare in science fiction. Sci-fi icons like “Star Trek” and “Star Wars” both depend upon the concept. But the speed of light - just over 186,000 miles per second - has been accepted as a universal constant since Einstein’s famous theories were generated. Now, an Australian physicist, Paul Davies, suggests that this speed may have slowed over time.
    107. 110. September 20, 2002 Light-Speed Debate Impacts Origins Theories By Stuart Shepard, correspondent Astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, at Iowa State University, said the idea would wreak havoc with theories about the first moments of the universe. “ This is extremely controversial among astronomers - just the observation itself, let alone the implications of it,” Gonzalez said. “If one or more of the physical constants were changing during that time, then it could require a complete revision or maybe an abandonment of the inflationary hypothesis.” The “inflationary hypothesis” is the idea that the universe has been expanding ever since it began with a “Big Bang.” Focus on the Family
    108. 111. April 2003
    109. 113. June 30, 2004 Speed of light may have changed recently By Eugene Samuel Reich “ The speed of light, one of the most sacrosanct of the physical constants, may have been lower as recently as two billion years ago- not in some far corner of the universe, but right here on earth.” NewScientist.com
    110. 114. 3. La creaciòn fue completa y madura cuando Dios la hizo. T he creation was finished and mature when God made it. Cosas para considerar acerca de la luz de las estrellas. Things to consider concerning starlight. “ Jesùs hizo vino de uvas que nunca existieron envejecidas en tiempo que nunca fue. Jesus m ade wine out of grapes that never existed aged in time that never was.” Divine Design or Cosmic Chaos Larry McFadden
    111. 115. ¿Què edad tenìa Adam en el dìa 6? How old was Adam on day 6?
    112. 116. God did not make two babies in the Garden of Eden and give them seeds to plant. The creation was mature.
    113. 117. 3. The creation was finished and mature when God made it. Adam was full grown, the trees had fruit on them. The stars could be seen on the first day. 4. A light year is a distance not a time. Things to consider concerning starlight.
    114. 118. 5. Since the speed of light is not proven to be consistent, why would star distance have anything to do with the age of the universe? Things to consider concerning starlight.
    115. 119. So how do scientists measure the ages of stars? “ We can also find absolute ages by comparing a star’s color and brightness with those in stellar evolution models.” Discover Sept. 2003 Pg. 17 What ?
    116. 120. What about the Red Shift or Cepheid variables?
    117. 124. The Doppler effect causes the sound to be higher as the train approaches and lower as it passes.
    118. 126. “ This was an early sign that redshifts reliably indicate the distances of galaxies. For QSOs [‘QSO’ = ‘Quasi-Stellar Object’ = ‘Quasar’], however, the diagram shows a wide scatter in apparent brightness at every redshift.”
    119. 127. “ In fact, there is little correlation of brightness to redshift at all! Either QSOs come in an extremely wide range of intrinsic luminosities, as most people believe, or their redshifts do not indicate distance.” Burbidge, Geoffrey, and Adelaide Hewitt, “A Catalog of Quasars Near and Far,” Sky and Telescope (December 1994) p. 32
    120. 128. “ Thus for us the only conclusion that can be drawn is that at least some QSOs are relatively nearby, and that a large fraction of their redshift is due to something other than the expansion of the universe.” Burbidge, Geoffrey, and Adelaide Hewitt, “A Catalog of Quasars Near and Far,” Sky and Telescope (December 1994) p. 33
    121. 129. Some redshifts are not due to the Doppler effect and an expanding universe. “ Radical Theory Takes a Test,” Science, 291:597, 2001, as quoted in Science Frontiers no. 138 See: The Evolution Cruncher p. 52 evolution-facts.org, 931-692-5777, Available from CSE $5
    122. 130. “ another set of observations indicates that the universe… appears to be … 8.4 to 10.6 billion years… The new work relied on the Hubble Space Telescope to obtain the distance to far away galaxies.” Science News Sept. 9, 1995, p. 166
    123. 131. “ A team led by Nail R. Tanvir of the University of Cambridge in England used a two step method to estimate the [Hubble] constant. First they observed a type of “standard candle” -stars known as Cepheid variables- to find the distance to the spiral galaxy M96… Science News Sept. 9, 1995, p. 166
    124. 132. “ You have to be very careful about [drawing conclusions] because all of the [Hubble constant] measurements have huge systematic errors.” Science News Sept. 9, 1995 p. 166
    125. 133. “ Astronomers believed the Veil, one of the best studied supernova remnants, was 2,500 Light Years away and 18,000 years old. … they were quite wrong. In fact, the Veil is only 1,500 LY away and 5,000 years old. K. A. Svittil Discover Jan. 2001. See also 2001 Scientific American vol. 284, no.5 “Rip Van Winkle” showing stars are much younger than they thought.
    126. 134. p. 56 “Even the nearest Cepheids are so remote that it is difficult to determine their absolute distances with any great accuracy…. “All large distances … in astronomical literature … subject to an error of perhaps 10 percent, from this cause alone.” Jeans, James, The Universe Around Us (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969)
    127. 135. p. 61 “We now know that faintness arises from two causes [distance and absorbing matter in space], and it is not generally possible to apportion it accurately between the two.” Jeans, James, The Universe Around Us (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969)
    128. 136. To see what happened to Halton C. Harp, who dared expose the problems with the red shift theory, See: The Evolution Cruncher p. 63, www.evolution-facts.org, 931-692-5777, Available from CSE $5
    129. 137. It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in: Isaías 40:22 El está asentado sobre el globo de la tierra , cuyos moradores son como langostas: él extiende los cielos como una cortina , tiéndelos como una tienda para morar:
    130. 138. Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; Así dice el Dios Jehová, el Criador de los cielos, y el que los extiende; Isaías 42:5
    131. 139. I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded. Yo hice la tierra, y crié sobre ella al hombre. Yo, mis manos, extendieron los cielos , y á todo su ejército mandé. Isaías 45:12
    132. 140. He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion. Jeremías 10:12 El que hizo la tierra con su potencia, el que puso en orden el mundo con su saber, y extendió los cielos con su prudencia;
    133. 141. Stretching out from creation?-mentioned 11 times Tired light? Effects of traveling great distances through ? In space. Doppler effect-star moving away? Light slowed or speeded up by gravity (black hole)? See Robert Gentry’s great technical article about redshift on www.haloes.com What is causing the red shift?
    134. 142. Great book showing the gospel story in the stars. Available from CSE $10
    135. 143. Coral Ridge Ministries PO box 40 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33302 www.coralridge.org, 954-771-8840
    136. 144. Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? ¿Podrás tú impedir las delicias de las Pléyades , O desatarás las ligaduras del Orión ? Job 38:31
    137. 146. Virgo the virgin
    138. 147. Leo the Lion
    139. 148. ¿Està el sol encogièndose ? Is the Sun Shrinking?
    140. 149. The Sun is losing 5,000,000 tons of matter per second.
    141. 150. Sun 1 Direct Measure Quote “ Since 1836, more than one hundred different observers at the Royal Greenwich Observatory and the U.S. Naval Observatory have made direct , visual measurements that suggest that the sun’s diameter is shrinking at a rate of about 0.1% each century or about five feet per hour. John A. Eddy and Aram A. Boornazian, “Secular Decrease in the Solar Diameter, 1863-1953,” Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , Vol. 11, No.2, 1979, p. 437
    142. 151. Sun 2 Indirect Measure Quote “ Several indirect techniques also confirm that the sun is shrinking, although these inferred collapse are only about 1/7 th as much.” (The Sun would have been touching the Earth about 158,272,358 years ago.) David W. Dunham, “Observations of a Probable Change in the Solar Radius between 1715 and 1979,” Science , Vol. 210, 12 December 1980, pp. 1243-1245
    143. 153. The sun would have absorbed Venus and Mercury.
    144. 154. What about Carbon Dating?
    145. 155. Geologic column from any textbook Fossils are really dated by their position in the geologic column which does not exist anywhere in the world except the textbooks.
    146. 156. <ul><ul><ul><li>“ Radiometric dating would not have been feasible if the geologic column had not been erected first.” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>O’Rourke, J. E., “Pragmatism versus Materialism in Stratigraphy,” American Journal of Science , vol. 276 (January 1976), p. 54 </li></ul></ul></ul>
    147. 157. <ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Ever since William Smith at the beginning of the 19th century, fossils have been and still are the best and most accurate method of dating and correlating the rocks in which they occur.” </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
    148. 158. <ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Apart from very ‘modern’ examples, which are really archaeology, I can think of no cases of radioactive decay being used to date fossils.” </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Ager, Derek V., “Fossil Frustrations,” New Scientist , vol. 100 (November 10, 1983), p. 425. </li></ul>
    149. 159. The earth’s atmosphere is about 100 miles thick
    150. 160. 1. The earth’s atmosphere contains: 78% nitrogen 21% oxygen .06% carbon dioxide .0000765% radio-active carbon (c 14 ) which combines with oxygen then mixes equally with the other normal CO 2 by the wind currents.
    151. 161. Earth’s magnetic field find and scan Radiation from the sun strikes the atmosphere and produces radio-active carbon 14. It combines with Oxygen to make CO 2 .
    152. 165. A Geiger counter is used to detect radio-active elements such as C 14 or Uranium. Focus on Physical Science 1984 p. 485
    153. 166. C 14 is being produced in the atmosphere by the sun. It breaks back down to nitrogen at the rate of 1/2 every 5,730 years.
    154. 167. 2. During photosynthesis plants breath in CO 2 and make it part of their tissue. (some of the C is C 14 ) 6CO 2 +6H 2 O C 6 H 12 O 6 +6O 2 Animals eat plants and make it part of their bodies.
    155. 170. For example: If the atmosphere is .0000756% C 14 it is assumed the plants and animals have the same %. 3. It is assumed that the ratio of radio-active C 14 to normal C 12 in the atmosphere would be the same ratio found in the living plants and animals.
    156. 171. 4. When the plant or animal dies it stops taking in new C 14 .
    157. 172. Whatever C 14 it has continues to decay. 1/2 of the C 14 decays every 5,730 years. Since it cannot gain any more it will go out of balance with the atmosphere. .0000765% = 0 years old .00003825%= 5,730 yrs .00001912%= 11,460 yrs .00000956%= 17,190 yrs
    158. 173. 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16
    159. 174. 5. By comparing the amount of C 14 in the object being dated with the amount currently in the atmosphere it can be estimated how long the object has been dead. If it only has 1/2 as much it is assumed that it died 5,730 years ago.
    160. 175. 6. While this all sounds good, there are some assumptions that enter in and throw it all off.
    161. 176. Water in Water out Equilibrium
    162. 177. It has been calculated that it would take 30,000 years for the earth’s atmosphere to reach equilibrium. It has not reached equilibrium yet. <ul><li>“ We know the earth is millions of years old.” </li></ul><ul><li>We can ignore the equilibrium problem.” </li></ul>
    163. 178. “ Radiocarbon is forming 28-37% faster than it is decaying” R.E. Taylor et al., “Major Revisions in the Pleistocene Age Assignments for North American Human Skeletons by C-14 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry,” American Antiquity , Vol. 50, No. 1 1985 pp. 136-140
    164. 179. Assumption #1 The amount of C 14 in the atmosphere has always been the same. (Has reached equilibrium). Ron Cooper, Rcooper@arky.org, (937) 256-2759 (ARKY) www.arky.org, has good info showing it has still not reached equilibrium.
    165. 180. 16 12 4 8 0 5,730 11,460 22,920 17,190 . . . . . 2 Expected Age in Years 28,650 . Carbon 14 Calibration Curve C 14 =.0000765% of atmosphere gasses 1/2 life of C 14 =5730 years. 0
    166. 181. When was it lit? Empirical Science: 1. Measure height. (7 inches) 2. Measure rate of burn. Ex. 1”/hour. When was it lit? Assumptions: 1. How tall was it? 2. Has it always burned at the same rate?
    167. 182. If you find a fossil in the dirt: The amount of C 14 can be measured and the rate of decay can be determined but that is all. How much C 14 was in it at death and has it always decayed at the same rate?
    168. 183. Visible Light X-Ray and UV Radiation (blocked) See Gen. 1:6-7 II Peter 3:3-7 Ps. 148:4
    169. 184. 16 12 4 8 0 5730 11,460 22,920 17,190 . . . . . 2 Expected Age 28,650 . Carbon 14 Calibration Curve C14=.0000765% of atmospheric gasses 1/2 life of C 14 is 5730 years
    170. 185. “ The lower leg of the Fairbanks Creek mammoth had a radiocarbon age of 15,380 RCY (radio carbon years) , while its skin and flesh were 21,300 RCY.” Harold E. Anthony, “Natures Deep Freeze,” Natural History, Sept. 1949, p. 300, See also: In the Beginning Walt Brown, www.creationscience.com
    171. 186. Living mollusk shells were carbon dated as being 2,300 years old. Science vol. 141, 1963 p. 634-637 M. Kieth and G. Anderson
    172. 187. “ If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely ‘out of date’, we just drop it.” T. Save-Soderbergh and I.U. Olsson (Institute of Egyptology and Institute of Physics respectively, Univ. of Uppsala, Sweden), C-14 dating and Egyptian chronology in Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology”, Proceedings of the twelfth Nobel Symposium , New York 1970, p. 35
    173. 188. A freshly killed seal was carbon dated as having died 1,300 years ago! Antarctic Journal vol. 6 Sept-Oct. 1971 p. 211
    174. 189. “ One part of Dima [a baby frozen mammoth] was 40,000, another part was 26,000 and the ‘wood immediately around the car- cass’ was 9-10,000.” Troy L. Pewe, Quaternary Stratigraphic Nomenclature in Unglaciated Central Alaska, Geological Survey Professional Paper 862 (U.S. Gov. printing office, 1975) p. 30
    175. 190. “ No matter how ‘useful’ it is, though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable results. There are gross discrepancies, the chronology is uneven and relative, and the accepted dates are actually selected dates. This whole blessed thing is nothing but 13 th -century alchemy*, and it all depends upon which funny paper you read. Robert E. Lee, “Radiocarbon: ages in error” Anthropological Journal of Canada, Vol. 19(3), 1981, pp. 9-29 * Alchemy (²l“k…-m¶) : magical power or process of transmuting, ( American Heritage Dictionary ).
    176. 191. Shells from living snails were carbon dated as being 27,000 years old. Science Vol. 224, 1984 p. 58-61
    177. 192. Eleven human skeletons, the earliest known human remains in the western hemisphere, have been dated by the accelerator mass spectrometer. All eleven were dated at about 5000 radiocarbon years or less! R.E. Taylor “Major Revisions In the Pleistocene Age Assignments for North American Human Skeletons by C-14 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry”, American Antiquity , Vo. 50 No. 1, 1985, pp 136-140
    178. 193. “ The two Colorado Creek, AK mammoths had radiocarbon ages of 22,850 670 and 16,150 230 years respectively.” Robert M. Thorson and R. Dale Guthrie, “Stratigraphy of the Colorado Creek Mammoth Locality, Alaska,” Quaternary Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, March 1992, pp. 214-228, see also: In the Beginning Walt Brown + + - -
    179. 194. “ A geologist at the Berkeley Geochronology Center, [Carl] Swisher uses the most advanced techniques to date human fossils. Last spring he was re-evaluating Homo erectus skulls found in Java in the 1930s by testing the sediment found with them. A hominid species assumed to be an ancestor of Homo sapiens ,
    180. 195. “ erectus was thought to have vanished some 250,000 years ago. But even though he used two different dating methods, Swisher kept making the same startling find: the bones were 53,000 years old at most and possibly no more than 27,000 years— a stretch of time contemporaneous with modern humans.” 96% error! Kaufman, Leslie, “Did a Third Human Species Live Among Us?” Newsweek (December 23, 1996 ), p. 52.
    181. 196. “ One part of the Vollosovitch mammoth carbon dated at 29,500 years old and another part at 44,000.” Troy L. Pewe, Quaternary Stratigraphic Nomenclature in Unglaciated Central Alaska, Geological Survey Professional Paper 862 (U.S. Gov. printing office, 1975) p. 30
    182. 197. “ In the last two years an absolute date has been obtained for (the Ngandong beds, above the Trinil beds), and it has the very interesting value of 300,000 years plus or minus 300,000 years.” Birdsell, J. B., Human Evolution (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1975), p. 295
    183. 200. P. 30
    184. 201. P. 32- is it less than 20,000 or more than 28,000?
    185. 202. Living Penguins have been dated as being 8,000 years old!
    186. 203. Material from layers where dinosaurs are found carbon dated at 34,000 years old. R. Daly Earth’s Most Challenging Mysteries , 1972, p. 280 Strange Stories, Amazing Facts Readers Digest 1978 p. 335
    187. 204. Russian scientists Kusnetsov and Ivanov carbon dated dinosaur bones at under 30,000 years. Strange Stories, Amazing Facts Readers Digest 1978 p. 335 Hugh Miller, Columbus, OH had 4 dinosaur bone samples carbon dated at 20,000 years old. The samples were not identified as dinosaur in advance. Noah to Abram the Turbulent Years, by Erich von Fange p. 36
    188. 205. Samples of Known Age Things to consider about Carbon Dating: Radioisotope Dating Doesn’t Work Samples of Unknown Age Radioisotope Dating Assumed to Work
    189. 206. As elements decay they produce helium. This helium slowly escapes through the rocks into the atmosphere. Very little is able to escape into space. After all factors are considered the helium in the atmosphere indicates the earth is less than two million years old. See. Blowing Old Earth Belief Away, J. Sarfati, Creation 20(3) p. 19-21 1998
    190. 207. A great book showing the problems with dating methods. Www.icr.org
    191. 208. “ The rocks do date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately. Stratigraphy cannot avoid this kind of reasoning if it insists
    192. 209. on using only temporal concepts, because circularity is inherent in the derivation of time scales.” O’Rourke, J. E., “Pragmatism versus Materialism in Stratigraphy,” American Journal of Science , vol. 276 (January 1976), p. 53
    193. 210. Moon rocks brought back in 1969, were given to many different laboratories to be dated. One rock (specimen 10017) was divided into 6 pieces and dated many times. The ages ranged from 2.5 billion to 4.6 billion years.
    194. 211. 1-6-99 I talked with James P. Dawson P.O. Box 1328 Edmond, Oklahoma 73083 Ph. (405) 348-3410, He was Chief of Engineering and Operations for the Lunar and Earth Science Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center NASA in Houston. He worked on Lunar samples including the Genesis rock. He told me they found ages from 10,000 years to several billion years in the same rock. www.jpdawson.com or www.aaronc.com
    195. 212. This book has a great chapter about how dating is done. Available from CSE (850) 479-3466 $13
    196. 213. What about Potassium -Argon Dating?
    197. 214. Mt. Ngauruhoe New Zeland lava flow Pic
    198. 216. Carbon dating PHES p. 527 Potassium-40 half life of 1.30 billion years
    199. 217. “ As much as 80% of the potassium in a small sample of an iron meteorite can be removed by distilled water in 4.5 hours” Rancitelli, L.A., and D.E. Fischer, “Potassium-Argon Agen of Iron Meteorites,” Planetary Sciences Abstracts, 48 th Annual Meeting, p. 167
    200. 218. “ In conventional interpretation of K-Ar age data, it is common to discard ages which are substantially too high or too low compared with the rest of the group or with other available data such as the geological time scale.” Hayatsu, A., “K-Ar Isochron Age of the North Mountain Basalt, Nova Scotia,” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 16 April, 1979, pp. 973-975
    201. 219. The KBS tuff, named for Kay Behrensmeyer, was dated using Potassium Argon (K-Ar) at 212-230 Million years. Nature April 18, 1970 p. 226. Photo National Geographic Nov. 1985 p. 589
    202. 220. Skull #KNM-ER 1470 was found (in 1972) under the KBS tuff by Richard Leakey. It looks like modern humans but was dated at 2.9 million years old. Bones of Contention Roger Lewin p. 257
    203. 221. Later, 10 different samples were dated from .52- 2.64 Million years old. (down from 212 million.) Bones of Contention by Marvin Lubenow, pp. 247-266 (Even this is more than a 500% error)
    204. 222. In 1770 George Buffon said the earth was 70,000 years old. Integrated Principles of Zoology 1996 P. 151 In 1905 the age of the earth was officially 2 billion years old. Newsweek July 20, 1998 p. 50
    205. 223. The Minneapolis Tribune Monday, August 25, 1969 In 1969 the official age of the earth and moon was 3.5 billion.
    206. 225. Today students are taught it is 4.6 billion years old. That means the earth has been getting older at the rate of 21 million years per year for the last 220 years! 40 years/min.
    207. 226. Things to consider about Carbon Dating: 1. Wild dates are obtained. 2. Dates that don’t fit evolution theory are rejected and not published. “Correct” dates match the geologic column. 3. It is based on the assumptions that: A. The original content of the sample is known. B. The decay rate never changes. C. The sample has not been contaminated. 4. All decays are downhill.
    208. 227. Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily (122 BC) gave K-AR age of 250,000 years old. Dalyrmple, G.B., 1969 40Ar/36Ar analysis of historic lava flows. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 6-47 55. See also: Impact # 307 Jan. 1999
    209. 228. Lava from the 1801 Hawaiian volcano eruption gave a K-Ar date of 1.6 Million years old. Funkhouser and Naughton, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 73, July 15, 1968, p. 4601. Dalyrmple, G.B., 1969 40Ar/36Ar analysis of historic lava flows. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 6-47 55. See also: Impact # 307 Jan. 1999
    210. 229. Basalt from Mt. Kilauea Iki, Hawaii (AD 1959) gave K-AR age of 8,500,000 years old. Impact # 307 Jan. 1999 See also: Creation Ex Nihilo Dec. 1999, p. 18
    211. 230. Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily (AD 1964) gave K-AR age of 700,000 years old. Impact # 307 Jan. 1999, ICR.ORG
    212. 231. Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily (AD 1972) gave K-AR age of 350,000 years old. Impact # 307 Jan. 1999, ICR.ORG
    213. 232. New Lava dome growing inside the crater since the 1980 eruption. See ICR.ORG or call 619-448-0900 for more on Mt. St. Helens
    214. 233. Lava from the new lave dome that grew in Mt. St. Helens Washington gave these results: Austin, S. A. 1996, Excess Argon Within Mineral Concentrates from the New Dacite Lava Dome at Mount St. Helens Volcano, CEN Tech. Journal, 10(3):335-343 350,000 2,800,000 900,000
    215. 234. Rocks of Known Age Things to consider about Potassium Argon Dating: Radioisotope Dating Doesn’t Work Rocks of Unknown Age Radioisotope Dating Assumed to Work
    216. 235. 1. Wild dates are obtained, potassium leaks out of systems easily. 2. Dates that don’t fit evolution theory are rejected and not published. “Correct” dates match the fictitious geologic column. 3. It is based on the assumptions that: A. The original content of the sample can be known. B. The decay rate never changes. C. The sample has not been contaminated. Things to consider about Potassium Argon Dating:
    217. 236. For more on the other dating methods See: The Evolution Cruncher p. 58 Available from CSE $5 900+ pages!
    218. 237. For more on the other dating methods the results of the RATE project by ICR. Available from ICR.org
    219. 238. Have fresh dinosaur bones been found?
    220. 239. The Great Alaskan Dinosaur Adventure p. 87 Master Books 800-999-3777 *
    221. 240. “ The journal Science on December 24, 1993 (pages 2020–2023) reported on the amazing preservation of the bones of a young duckbill dinosaur found in Montana. Under a microscope, the fine structure of the bones was seen to have been preserved to such an extent that cell characteristics could be compared with cells of chicken bone.” http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/freshbones.html
    222. 241. In northwestern Alaska in 1961 a geologist found a bed of dinosaur bones in unpermineralized (unfossilized) condition. (See Journal of Paleontology , vol. 61 no. 6, 1986–7, pages 198–200.)
    223. 242. Along the banks of the Colville River west of Prudhoe Bay, AK frozen dinosaur bones were found that are, “as light as balsa wood and look as fresh as yesterday’s dog bones.” “ Their structure was porous and the fossils were not mineralized.” Don Lessem, Omni, Jan. 1990, p. 32
    224. 243. A young Inuit (Canadian Eskimo) who was working with scientists from Newfoundland’s Memorial University in 1987 on Bylot Island found part of a lower jaw of a duckbill dinosaur. It too was in fresh condition. http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/freshbones.html Joe Taylor has some. Www.mtblanco.com
    225. 244. Time for Kids, April 27, 2000, p. 7
    226. 245. If there was really a flood, where are all the human bones?
    227. 246. Lubenow says there have been about 4000 human remains found. Very few complete and most only small fragments. Available from CSE (850)479-3466 $13
    228. 247. Creationist’s Time Line: 1”=150 years 0 Jesus’ Birth 2000 6000 years ago (4000 BC) Creation 4400 YA Flood When God created the earth it was full of plants and animals yet only two people. Tabla de la Creación
    229. 248. Tabla de la Población Humano Billion e s de almas
    230. 249. Antediluvian life span chart Average life-span 900+ now: 70-100
    231. 250. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; Génesis 6:7 Y dijo Jehová: Raeré los hombres que he criado de sobre la faz de la tierra,
    232. 251. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Génesis 6:4 Había gigantes en la tierra en aquellos días , y también después que entraron los hijos de Dios á las hijas de los hombres, y les engendraron hijos: éstos fueron los valientes que desde la antigüedad fueron varones de nombre.
    233. 252. thumb bones call Ron Wyatt for new picture 615-331-6263 Done 8-25-97 Photo by Ron Wyatt 931-486-0557
    234. 254. Reasons why so few human fossils are found. 1. There were less people to be killed than animals. 2. People are smarter than animals (some people) and would tend to avoid drowning until last and end up on top to rot instead of buried to fossilize. 3. If humans were bigger, the bones may not be recognized as human due to the preconceived evolution world-view.
    235. 255. Was ancient man primitive?
    236. 256. Great book from creationist perspective on the incredible achievements of ancient man. Available from CSE $10 503-625-7679
    237. 257. What was it like before the flood? How can a man live to be over 900 years old?
    238. 258. Antediluvian life span chart Average age before the flood was 912 years. Today, 70-80 Chart is in seminar notebook or laminated for $5
    239. 259. Airplane found in a grave in Columbia, SA. Now in Smithsonian. They estimate it to be about 1000 years old. The Puzzle of Ancient Man Don Chittick p. 110. Available from CSE-$10
    240. 260. Smithsonian has it labeled as a “stylized insect.” The Puzzle of Ancient Man Don Chittick p. 110.
    241. 261. Airplane found in a 2100 year old Egyptian tomb.
    242. 263. Cast Iron pot found in coal in 1912 at the Municipal Electric Plant in Thomas, OK. Now in Creation Evidence Museum, www.creationevidence.org
    243. 266. 100 ton stone in Sachsahuaman, Peru. One stone weighs about 20,000 tons! The largest crane on earth today can only lift 3,000 tons. The Puzzle of Ancient Man Don Chittick p. 115. CSE-$10
    244. 267. “ What is truly impossible about the block is that it is the size of a five story house and weighs an estimated 20,000 tons! We have no combination of machinery today that could dislodge such a weight, let alone move it any distance. … shows their mastery of a technology which we as yet have not attained.” Secrets of the Lost Races , Rene Noorbergen, p. 197
    245. 268. W. V. Mr. Newton Anderson found this bell inside a lump of coal in 1944. He still has the bell. I talked with him on 12-20-99. 3114 State Park Rd. Greenville, SC 29609 [email_address] See: Ammunition by Norm Scharbough Communique Conservative Publishers PO Box 215, Brownsburg, IN 46112 1991 (317)-852-0877 photo 10-22-99
    246. 269. 4 1/2 inch high zinc and silver vessel found in solid rock “over 600 million year old” in Dorchester, Mass. in 1851. Readers Digest Mysteries of the Unexplained p. 46 also Scientific American June 1851 p. 289-299 The Hidden History of the Human Race, Cremo p. 106
    247. 270. Analog computing device found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in 100 BC. National Science Foundation. The Puzzle of Ancient Man Don Chittick p. 9. CSE-$10
    248. 271. Analog computing device found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in 100 BC. National Science Foundation. The Puzzle of Ancient Man Don Chittick p. 9.
    249. 272. Analog computing device found in a ship in the Aegean Sea sunk in 100 BC. National Science Foundation. Creation Ex Nihilo Mar. 1995 p. 9.
    250. 273. Found by Emma Hahn in June, 1934 in London, TX. Sea shells surrounding the hammer had been dated at 400 million years old. Part of the handle had turned to coal. Batelle Lab. Said it is 96.6% iron, 2.6% chlorine, .74% sulfur. Carl Baugh has it in his museum. 254-897-3200
    251. 274. 2000 year old battery found in Iraq. Creation ex nihilo Mar. 1994, p. 12
    252. 275. World Explorer Magazine Vol. 1 No. 6, p. 62, 815-253-6300
    253. 276. Trepanning
    254. 277. Stone from Ica, Peru showing brain surgery
    255. 280. Stone from Ica, Peru showing heart surgery?
    256. 284. In real life this little spider is 1/8 inch long and has the long “leg” on the right side only for mating. How did they know?
    257. 285. Over the past several decades, South Afrikaans miners have found hundreds of metallic spheres, at least one of which has three parallel grooves running around its equator. The spheres are of two types - &quot;one of solid bluish metal with white flecks, and another which is hollow and filled with a white spongy center&quot;. Roelf Marx, curator of the museum of Klerksdorp, South Africa, where some of the spheres are housed, said:&quot; the spheres are a complete mystery. They look man-made, yet at the time in Earth's history when they came to rest in this rock, no intelligent life (supposedly) existed; they're nothing like I have ever seen before&quot;. Facts are : The spheres are found in pyrophyllite, which is mined near the little town of Ottosdale in the Western Transvaal. The pyrophyllite is a mineral created by metamorphism at moderate temperature and burial depths of over several kilometers. Such metamorphism has significantly altered the original clays or volcanic ashes into greenschist grade
    258. 286. metamorphics. As a result, the original sedimentary and igneous structures of these rocks have been, except locally, totally obliterated. Any primary concretions within both the sediments and volcanic rocks would also have been obliterated at this degree of metamorphism. The presence of goethite nodules in the weathered pyrophyllite is consistent with the presence of pyrite nodules in the unweathered pyrophyllite because goethite is a common weathering product of pyrite, which is not sedimentary. This pyrophyllite is a quite soft secondary mineral, with a count of only 3 on the Mohs scale, and was formed by sedimentation about 2.8 billion years ago. These spheres consist of goethite within the near-surface, weathered pyrophyllite and consist of pyrite in the unweathered pyrophyllite. The pyrite spheres are metamorphic nodules that formed during the alteration of either clay or volcanic ash to pyrophyllite by metamorphism. The goethite spheres are pyrite nodules altered by weathering near the ground surface. On the other hand, the globes which have a fibrous structure on the inside with a shell around it are very hard and cannot be scratched , even by steel.
    259. 287. The Mohs scale of hardness is named after Friedrich Mohs, who chose ten minerals as reference points for comparative hardness, with talc the softest (1) and diamond the hardest (10). Roelf Marx said that A. Bisschoff, a professor of geology at the University of Potchefstroom, told him that the spheres were &quot;limonite concretions&quot;. Limonite is a kind of iron, and a concretion is a compact, rounded rock mass formed by localized cementation around a nucleus. Limonite is a field term for a group of brown, amorphous, naturally occurring, hydrous, ferric oxides whose identities are unknown. Limonite can be composed of variable proportions of goethite, hematite, and various other iron hydroxides. One problem with the hypothesis that the objects are limonite concretions concerns their &quot;hardness&quot;. As noted above, the metallic spheres cannot be scratched with a steel point, indicating they are extremely hard. But standard references on minerals state that limonite registers only 4 to 5.5 on the
    260. 288. Mohs scale, indicating a relatively low degree of hardness. Furthermore, limonite concretions usually occur in groups, like masses of soap bubbles stuck together. They do not, it seems, normally appear isolated and perfectly round, as is the case with the objects in question; neither do they normally appear with parallel grooves encircling them . &quot;For the purposes of this study, it is the sphere with three parallel grooves around its equator that most concerns us. Even if it is conceded that the sphere itself is a limonite concretion (or a metamorphic nodule), one still must account for the three parallel grooves. In the absence of a satisfactory natural explanation, the evidence is somewhat mysterious, leaving open the possibility that the South African grooved sphere, found in a mineral deposit 2.8 billion years old, was made by an intelligent being.&quot; ~ Michael A. Cremo
    261. 289. The Hidden History of the Human Race Michael Cremo
    262. 290. Nano-technology artifacts from the upper Pleistocene (approx. 2 million years ago), have been discovered in the Ural mountains in Russia. The present report, by the Central Scientific Research Institute for Geology and Prospecting for Precious and Non-Ferrous Metals (ZNIGRI) in Moscow, emphasizes the possibility of an extraterrestrial origin. Since 1991, more and more mostly spiral-shaped objects have been found, on the banks of the rivers Narada, Kozim, and Balbanyu in the eastern Ural mountains. To date, these inexplicable artifacts have been found in their thousands at various sites near the rivers, and also by two smaller streams named Vtvisty and Lapkhevozh, mostly at depths between 3 and 12 meters (10 and 40 ft.). The size of these things ranges from a maximum of 3 cm (1.2 in.) down to an incredible 0.003 mm, about 1/10,000th of an inch! Exact measurements of these often microscopically small objects have shown that the dimensions of the spirals are in the so-called Golden Mean Ratio .
    263. 291. Since ancient classical times this fraction has been the &quot;iron rule&quot; in architecture and geometry. Its usefulness is in the fact that if a certain length is divided into two using this ratio, the ratio of the original length to the larger piece is the same as that of the larger piece to the smaller piece. The objects are composed principally of tungsten, molybdenum, and copper; the larger ones are of copper, while the small and very small ones are of the rare metals tungsten and molybdenum. Tungsten has a high atomic weight, and is also very dense, with a melting point of 3410 deg. C (6100 deg. F). Today, it is used principally for the hardening of special steels, and in unalloyed form for the filaments of light bulbs. Molybdenum also has a high density, and a respectable melting point of 2650 deg. C (4740 deg. F). This metal too is used for hardening steels and giving them corrosion-resistant properties, these being used principally for highly-stressed weapon parts and vehicle armor. According to Dr. Valerii Ouvarov, further analyses of the mysterious spirals were carried out by the out-stations of the Russian Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg and in Syktyvar (former capital of the Komi ASSR), and also at an independent institute in Helsinki, Finland. Scientific Assistant Mme.
    264. 292. Dr. E. W. Matveyeva, of the Section for Geology, Prospecting Techniques, and Economics of Precious Metal Alluvial Deposits, states, regarding the age of the strata which contain the tungsten and molybdenum artifacts, as follows: &quot;The layer which contains the spiral-shaped objects is characterized as gravel and detritus deposits of No. 3 stratum, which in our view, show inner-sedimentary erosion of polygenetic accumulative layers (i.e. layers composed of material of various origins). From their orientation these layers can be dated to 100,000 years ago and correspond to the lying parts (i.e. the lower regions) of the Mikulinsk horizon of the upper Pleistocene. In the geological time-scale, the Pleistocene is that part of the Quaternary, the latest geological epoch, which began about 2 million years ago and ended around 10,000 years ago. After that followed the Holocene, in which we are at the moment. http://members.nbci.com/logos72/harbinger11.htm Wednesday, May 19, 1999. Day 138
    265. 293. Fib sequence
    266. 294. What about the Great Pyramid?
    267. 295. 1. It was built by godly people before the flood. 2. It was built by heathen before the flood. There are basically 4 theories about who built the Great Pyramid? 3. It was built by godly people after the flood. 4. It was built by heathen after the flood. *
    268. 297. In that day shall there be an altar to the LORD in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the LORD. And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the LORD of hosts in the land of Egypt: Isaías 19:19-20 En aquel tiempo habrá altar para Jehová en medio de la tierra de Egipto, y el trofeo de Jehová junto á su término. Y será por señal y por testimonio á Jehová de los ejércitos en la tierra de Egipto: porque á Jehová clamarán á causa de sus opresores, y él les enviará salvador y príncipe que los libre.
    269. 300. It is the largest building in the world by far.
    270. 301. It contains enough stone to build a 10 foot high brick wall all the way around Texas! Some of the stones weigh 70 tons. The top is 455’ high.
    271. 302. The entrance starts you on the broad way which leads to the pit or you can take the narrow way which leads to kings chamber which contains an empty tomb. 50 th row of stones
    272. 303. Empty tomb
    273. 304. The pyramid was originally covered with 144,000 casing stones that were fitly joined together so that in many cases the seams could not even be found. The top stone was never installed.
    274. 305. And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. Revelacíon 7:4 Y oí el número de los señalados, ciento y cuarenta y quatro mil señalados de todas las tribus de los hijos de Israel.
    275. 306. From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love. Efesios 4:16 Del cual todo el cuerpo bien ligado entre sí y compacto por lo que cada coyuntura suple, conforme a la operación eficaz en la medida de cada miembro, hace el aumento del cuerpo para la edificación del mismo en amor.
    276. 307. Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Díceles Jesús: ¿Nunca leísteis en las escrituras: La piedra que desecharon los edificadores , ésta es puesta por cabeza del ángulo: Por el Señor es hecho esto, y es cosa maravillosa en nuestros ojos? Mateo 21:42
    277. 308. And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: Marcos 12:10 ¿Ni aun esta escritura habéis leído: La piedra que desecharon los edificadores , ésta es puesta por cabeza del ángulo:
    278. 309. And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner? Lucas 20:17 Mas él mirándolos, dijo: ¿Qué pues es esto que está escrito: La piedra que desecharon los edificadores , ésta es puesta por cabeza del ángulo?
    279. 310. Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. Daniel 2:34 Estabas mirando, hasta que una piedra fué cortada, no con mano, la cual hirió á la imagen en sus pies de hierro y de barro cocido, y los desmenuzó.
    280. 311. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. Revelación o Ap. 21:2 Y yo Juan vi la santa ciudad, la nueva Jerusalem, que descendía del cielo, aderezada de Dios, como la desposada ataviada para su marido.
    281. 312. And there came unto me one of the seven angels … and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife. 10 And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, 11 Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; 16 And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs (1379 miles). The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal. Revelation 21:9-16 Y vino a mí uno de los siete ángeles ... y habló conmigo, diciendo: Ven acá, yo te mostraré la desposada, esposa del ...
    282. 313. Cordero. 10 Y llevóme en el Espíritu a un grande, y alto monte, y mostróme la grande ciudad, la santa Jerusalem, que descendía del cielo de Dios, 11 Teniendo la gloria de Dios; y su lumbre era semejante a una piedra preciosísima, como piedra de jaspe clara como cristal . 16 Y la ciudad está situada y puesta en cuado , y su longitud es tanta como su anchura. Y él midió la ciudad con la caña, y tenia doce mil estadios ; y la longitud, y la altura de ella son iguales. Revelación o Ap. 21:9-16
    283. 314. Dr. Hutchings takes the position that the pyramid was built to be a testimony to the Lord. Many have called it “the Bible in stone.” Available from Southwest Radio Church in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 405-789-1222
    284. 315. This occult symbol was put on the back of the U.S. one dollar bill in 1935. MDCCLXXVI= 1776
    285. 316. Was the earth ever a hot molten mass?
    286. 317. Holt Earth Science 1994 p. 280
    287. 318. And the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Génesis 1:2 … y el Espíritu de Dios se movía sobre la haz de las aguas .
    288. 319. w ww.halos.com Dr. Robert Gentry Powell, TN 423-947-4726
    289. 321. I met with Dr. Gentry 3-1-00 to see the polonium halos first hand.
    290. 322. 218 Po half-life=3 minutes 214 Po half-life=.164 seconds
    291. 325. What about Global Warming?
    292. 326. For the earth is the Lord’s and the fulness thereof. 1 Corintios 10:26 Porque del Señor es la tierra , y la plenitud de ella.
    293. 327. When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field; The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas. Psalm 8:3-8 Cuando veo tus cielos , obra de tus dedos, La luna y las estrellas que tú formaste: Digo: ¿Qué es el hombre, para que tengas de él memoria, Y el hijo del hombre, que lo visites? Pues le has hecho ...
    294. 328. Salmos 8:3-8 poco menor que los ángeles, Y coronástelo de gloria y de lustre. Hicístelo enseñorear de las obras de tus manos; Todo lo pusiste debajo de sus pies : Ovejas, y bueyes, todo ello; Y asimismo las bestias del campo, Las aves de los cielos, y los peces de la mar; Todo cuanto pasa por los senderos de la mar.
    295. 329. Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto 1848. 1. Abolish private property. 2. Heavy progressive income tax 3. Abolish rights of inheritance 4. Confiscation of property rights 5. Central Bank 6. Government ownership of communication and transportation 7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture 8. Government control of labor 9. Corporate farms, regional planning 10. Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Combination of Education with Industrial Production.
    296. 330. 1. Abolish private property. 2. Heavy progressive income tax 3. Abolish rights of inheritance 4. Confiscation of property rights 5. Central Bank 6. Government ownership of communication and transportation 7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture 8. Government control of labor 9. Corporate farms, regional planning 10. Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Combination of Education with Industrial Production. Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto 1848. 1. Abolish private property.
    297. 331. And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. Lev. 25:10 Levítico 25:10 Y santificaréis el año cincuenta , y pregonaréis libertad en la tierra á todos sus moradores: este os será jubileo; y volveréis cada uno á su posesión , y cada cual volverá á su familia.
    298. 332. And Judah and Israel dwelt safely, every man under his vine and under his fig tree, from Dan even to Beersheba, all the days of Solomon. 1 Reyes 4:25 Y Judá é Israel vivían seguros, cada uno debajo de su parra y debajo de su higuera , desde Dan hasta Beer-seba, todos los días de Salomón.
    299. 333. Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well. Proverbios 5:15 Bebe el agua de tu cisterna , Y los raudales de tu pozo. .
    300. 334. “ We reject the idea of private property” Peter Berle, President of the National Audubon Society
    301. 335. A coloring page in a public school in Southwick, Massachusetts
    302. 336. I pledge allegiance to the world To care for earth, sea, and air To honor every living thing With peace and justice everywhere! 3rd grade Superior, WS public school
    303. 337. On 11-18-01 Jacob Bredsten, (763-754-8987), told me that when he was in 3rd grade at Johnsville Elementary school in Blaine, MN his teacher, Ms. Klophocky, took down the American flag and made the kids pledge to the earth instead.
    304. 338. Available from Derry Brownfield 573-584-3317 R-12 sinks. A volcano can produce 1000’s of times more Ozone destroying material than all the man made products combined. *
    305. 339. Doesn’t the Green River Formation prove the earth is millions of years old?
    306. 340. Evolutionists often point to the Green River Formation as proof the Earth is millions of years old.
    307. 343. These layers formed very rapidly. The number of “annual layers between ash “event horizons” varies by 35%! Creation Magazine “ 300-360 layers formed in 160 years.” Catfish fossils are often found here with bodies extending through several layers. Do Millions of Laminae in the Green River Shales Document Millions of Years? John Morris back to Genesis # 169, Jan. 2003.
    308. 344. What about the Mars rock?
    309. 346. Space Museum in Alamogordo, NM. Photo- 3-04
    310. 347. Mars Lander “ The mars lander sampled the martian soil. The sophisticated test performed on those samples did not even find a trace of a germ.” Nasa
    311. 348. Space Museum in Alamogordo, NM. Photo- 3-04
    312. 351. Namowitz/Spaulding 1989 p. 361
    313. 352. Prentice Hall Earth Science 1991 p. 73
    314. 353. The facts to consider about this rock: 1. They claim it came from mars. 2. They claim it was broken off 16 million years ago and landed 13,000 years ago. What did the bacteria eat? How did it survive: impact, vacuum of space, re-entry, freezing for 13,000 years? 3. NASA-funded team did the research. 4. NASA grant money was stalled in congress. When the announcement was made about the “Mars rock” the money was soon released.
    315. 354. A study led by John Bradley of the Georgia Institute of Technology said the “fossils” are “actually lamellae-fractured surfaces of pyroxene and carbonate crystals which were formed by geologic processes.” Aviation Week & Space Technology Dec. 8, 1997.
    316. 355. And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. Génesis 3:20 Y llamó el hombre el nombre de su mujer, Eva; por cuanto ella era madre de todos lo vivientes .
    317. 356. What about Theistic evolution?
    318. 357. What about theistic evolution? Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean by “God.”
    319. 358. What about theistic evolution? Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? The “god” that would need to use evolution is cruel, wasteful, stupid and deceitful and is not the God of the Bible.
    320. 359. It is not the character of the God of the Bible to use misfits, blind chance and death. He gets it right the first time.
    321. 360. Jacque Monod, a Nobel Prize winner in biology when commenting on theistic evolution stated that: “ Natural selection is the blindest, and most cruel way of evolving new species, and more and more complex and refined organisms... The struggle for life and elimination of the weakest is a horrible process, against which our whole modern ethics revolts. An ideal society is a non-selective society, one where the weak is protected; which is exactly the reverse of the so-called natural law.
    322. 361. <ul><li>I am surprised that a Christian would defend the idea that this is the process which God more or less set up in order to have evolution.” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jacques Monrod, “The Secret of Life,” Interview with Laurie John, Australian Broadcasting Co., June 10, 1976. </li></ul></ul>
    323. 362. <ul><li>Philosopher David Hull of Northwestern University writes, regarding the implications of theistic evolution on the character of God, that: </li></ul><ul><li>“ Whatever the God implied by evolutionary theory and the data of natural history may be like, He is not the Protestant God of waste not, want not. He is also not a loving God who cares about His productions. He is not even the awful God portrayed in the book of Job. The God of Galapagos is careless, wasteful, indifferent, almost diabolical. He is certainly not the sort of god to whom anyone would be inclined to pray.” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>David L. Hull, “The God of the Galapagos,” review of Darwin on Trial by Phillip Johnson, Nature, vol. 352 (August 8, 1991), p. 486 as cited by Henry Morris p. 416. </li></ul></ul>
    324. 363. The “god” of evolution is cruel! “ thus from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of higher animals, directly follows.” Charles Darwin The Origin of Species… p. 243
    325. 364. He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he. Deuteronomio 32:4 El es la Roca, cuya obra es perfecta , Porque todos sus caminos son rectitud: Dios de verdad, y ninguna iniquidad en él: Es justo y recto.
    326. 365. What about theistic evolution? Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? The “god” that would use evolution is cruel, wasteful, stupid and deceitful.
    327. 366. What about theistic evolution? Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean by “God.” 2. It is not the God of the Bible! The clear teaching of the Bible is nothing like the evolution theory.
    328. 367. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. Por fe entendemos que los mundos fueron formados por la palabra de Dios , de modo que las cosas que se ven no fueron hechas de cosas que aparecen. Hebreos 11:3
    329. 368. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is… Éxodo 20:11 Porque en seis días hizo Jehová los cielos y la tierra, la mar y todas las cosas que en ellos hay,
    330. 369. and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. y reposó en el séptimo día: por tanto Jehová bendijo el día del reposo y lo santificó. Éxodo 20:11
    331. 370. For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. Hebreos 4:3 Entramos empero en el reposo los que hemos creído, de la manera que dijo: Así que juré en mi ira, no entrarán en mi reposo: aunque las obras eran acabadas desde la fundación del mundo.
    332. 371. For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. Hebreos 4:4 Porque en cierto lugar dijo así del séptimo día: Y reposó Dios de todas sus obras en el séptimo día .
    333. 372. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. Génesis 2:2 Y acabó Dios en el día séptimo su obra que hizo, y reposó el día séptimo de toda su obra que había hecho.
    334. 373. Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin: and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Romanos 5:12 Por tanto, así como el pecado entró en el mundo por un hombre , y por el pecado la muerte así pasó a todos los hombres por cuanto todos pecaron
    335. 374. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 1 Corintios 15:21-22 Porque por cuanto la muerte vino por un hombre , también por un hombre vino la resurrección de los muertos. Porque a la manera que en Adam todos mueren , así también todos en Cristo serán vivificados.
    336. 375. “ And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness… So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Y dijo Dios: Hagamos al hombre á nuestra imagen, Y crió Dios al hombre á su imagen, á imagen de Dios lo crió; varón y hembra los crió. Any other teaching is heresy! ¡Cualquier otra enseñanza es herejía! Genesis 1:26 y 27
    337. 376. What about theistic evolution? Couldn’t God have used evolution to create the universe? 1. That depends on what you mean by “God.” 2. Not the clear teaching of the Bible. 3. That would be a retarded God who can’t make it right first time. He is not worthy of worship!
    338. 377. 4. Nullifies the need for the death of Christ. 5. There is no evidence for evolution anyway so why compromise a perfectly good Bible with a silly theory like this?
    339. 378. Does the Bible match evolution? <ul><li>1. Earth before sun </li></ul><ul><li>2. Oceans before land </li></ul><ul><li>3. Light before sun </li></ul><ul><li>4. Land plants first </li></ul><ul><li>5. Fruit trees before fish </li></ul><ul><li>6. Fish before insects </li></ul><ul><li>1. Sun before earth </li></ul><ul><li>2. Land before oceans </li></ul><ul><li>3. Sun before light </li></ul><ul><li>4. Marine life first </li></ul><ul><li>5. Fish before fruit trees. </li></ul><ul><li>6. Insects before fish </li></ul>Bible Evolution La Biblia Evolución <ul><li>1. La Tierra vino antes del sol </li></ul><ul><li>2. Oceanos antes de la tierra </li></ul><ul><li>3. L uz antes del sol </li></ul><ul><li>4. Plantas primero </li></ul><ul><li>5. Arboles frutales antes de peces </li></ul><ul><li>6. Peces antes de los insectos </li></ul><ul><li>1. El sol antes de la tierra </li></ul><ul><li>2. La tierra antes de los oceanos </li></ul><ul><li>3. El sol antes de la luz </li></ul><ul><li>4. Vida aquática primero </li></ul><ul><li>5. Peces antes de los árboles frutales </li></ul><ul><li>6. Inséctos antes de los pe

    ×