Brånemark System®                                                                   Facts & FiguresBrånemark System® is sy...
Table 1. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR) in full arch replacements.     Full arch replacements        ...
Table 2. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR) in partial replacements.     Partial replacements            ...
1.   Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5       y...
22. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR,      Lindén U. ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Brånemark System ® Facts

301 views
265 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
301
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Brånemark System ® Facts

  1. 1. Brånemark System® Facts & FiguresBrånemark System® is synonymous with the revolution in dental care by the introduction ofsafe and effective implants. Professor Brånemark, its inventor, always put the patient in focusand secured the outcome by meticulous clinical evidence. The first patient was treated in 1965,and Brånemark System® is today the most used and documented implant system on themarket. More than 1000 articles, published in scientific journals, report on the use and theexcellent outcome of Brånemark System® implants.A dominating positionIn a published review6 on prospective, long-term clinical studies, Brånemark System® had adominating position; more than 50% of the reviewed articles reported on studies performedwith Brånemark System® implants.Prospective long-term clinical studiesThe reference tables below shows an overview of some of the Brånemark System® long-termstudies with at least 5 years of follow-up. The references are divided according to indicationareas; i.e., full-arch, partial and single-tooth replacements.GEN 62715 April 2007
  2. 2. Table 1. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR) in full arch replacements. Full arch replacements Prosthesis F-up CSR CSR (implants) (prostheses) mand max mand max Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 OD 15 y 96% 100% Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 FB 20 y 87% 84% Bergendal T & Engquist B 1998 OD 5y 100% 75% - - Eliasson A et al 2000 FB 5y 99% - - - Ericsson I et al 2000 FB 5y 100% - - - Ekelund JA et al 2003 FB 20 y 99% - 100% - Friberg B et al 1997 FB 5y 100% 87% 97% Hemmings KW et al 1994 OD 5y 93% - - - Jemt T 1994 FB 5y - 92% - 96% Jemt T et al 2002 FB 5y - 93% - 95% Naert I et al 1998 OD 5y 99% - - - Naert I et al 2004 OD 10 y 99% Watson RM et al 1997 OD 5y 94% 72% 100% 78% Åstrand P et al 2004 FB 5y 95% - 99.5% 89% 100% 95% Örtorp A et al 2004 FB 5y 100%* 97%* 100%* 96.5%* FB, fixed bridge; OD, overdenture; * The reference includes 2 study groups.GEN 62715 April 2007
  3. 3. Table 2. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR) in partial replacements. Partial replacements Prosthesis F-up CSR CSR (implants) (prostheses) mand max mand max Attard N et al 2003 FPD 8y 92% 89% Glauser R et al 2007 FPD 5y 97% - - Gunne J et al 1999 FPD 10 y 88% - 82.5% - Jemt T & Lekholm U 1993 FPD 5y 97% 100% Jemt T et al 2003 FPD 5y 99% 100% 97.5% (Group A) Lekholm U et al 1994 FPD 5y 94% 92% 94% Lekholm U et al 1999 FPD 10 y 94% 90% 86.5% Wyatt CCL & Zarb GA 1998 FPD 5y 94% 97% Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FPD 5y 92% 98% - - Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FB/OD 5y 89% 94% 100% 100% FB, fixed bridge; OD, overdenture; FPD, fixed partial denture Table 3. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR) in single tooth replacements. Single tooth replacements F-up CSR CSR (implants) (prostheses) mand max mand max Andersson B et al 1998 5y NR 98.5% NR 94 % Andersson B et al 1998 5y - 100% - 97% Henry PJ et al 1996 5y NR 97% - - Polizzi G et al 1999 5y 93% - Scheller H et al 1998 5y NR 98% NR 91 % NR, not reported in the table (< 20 implants)ReferencesGEN 62715 April 2007
  4. 4. 1. Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: Results from a prospective study on CeraOne. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:212-8. 2. Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implant treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:351-5. 3. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: The Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:352-9. 4. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:417-24. 5. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:425-33. 6. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant therapy reported in prospective longitudinal studies of 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 (suppl 3):197-212. 7. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: A longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-62. 8. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 9. Ekelund JA, Lindquist L, Carlsson G, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602-8. 10. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-10. 11. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Peterson A. Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants: 5-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:70-7. 12. Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M, Palmquist C. MkII: the self-tapping Brånemark implant. 5-year results of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:279-85. 13. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(suppl): S59-S68. 14. Gunne J, Åstrand P, Lindh T, Borg K, Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10- year report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:216-21. 15. Hemmings KW, Schmitt A, Zarb GA. Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:191-6. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 16. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PHJ, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5. 17. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:142-7. 18. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath M R, Hutton J E, Johns R B, McKenna S, McNamara D C , van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson R M, Herrmann I. A 5-year prospective multi-center follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-8.(See also reference Watson RM et al 1997) 19. Jemt T, Bergendal B, Arvidson K, Bergendal T, Karlsson U, Lindén B, Rundcrantz T, Wendelhag I. Implant- supported welded titanium frameworks in the edentulous maxilla: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:544-8. 20. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-40. 21. Jemt T, Henry P, Lindén B, Naert I, Weber H, Wendelhag I. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:415-21.GEN 62715 April 2007
  5. 5. 22. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR, Lindén U. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-635. 23. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Brånemark Implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45. 24. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:329-36. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 25. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:170-7. 26. Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:695-702. 27. Olsson M, Gunne J, Åstrand P, Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:114-21. (See also reference Gunne J et al 1999) 28. Polizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:496-503. 29. Scheller H, Pi Urgell J, Kultje C, Klineberg I, Goldberg PV, Stevenson-Moore P, Alonso JMN, Schaller M, Corria RM, Engquist B, Toreskog S, Kastenbaum F, and Smith CR. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-8. 30. Watson RM, Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, Lithner B, McKenna S, McNamara DC, Naert I, Taylor R. Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant- supported overdentures: An appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:345-54. 31. Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11. 32. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-7; Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61; Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. (See also reference Attard Nj & Zarb GA 2004) 33. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Osseointegration and the edentulous predicament. The 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J 1991;170:439-44. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 34. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:180-8. 35. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Proshtodont 1993;6:189-96. 36. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:413-20. 37. Örtorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of computer numeric control-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:199-209.GEN 62715 April 2007

×