Rfid South West Wales Area Partnership (SWAP)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Rfid South West Wales Area Partnership (SWAP)

on

  • 1,542 views

Presentation given at the South West Wales Area Partnership (SWAP) meeting on 7th December 2009

Presentation given at the South West Wales Area Partnership (SWAP) meeting on 7th December 2009

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,542
Views on SlideShare
1,541
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
7
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.slideshare.net 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Look at the big picture / context as this will shape your procurement What you want – self service (how many units?), stock management, self payment, automated sorting, smart shelves, more than one site? Why you want it – what’s the rationale /long & short term goals? What you can commit – staff resource to the project, finance Strategy – short / long term goals, service revolution? RFID is transformational technology but not transformative of itself, so where does it fit in around service plans? Resource – in terms of project management, internal staff / external staff, external consultancy? Timescale – how soon, are there specific times of year (e.g. vacations) you want to do work in? Do you have a fixed ‘go live’ date to deliver? Budget – not just for the system, but the overall project – e.g. any additional LMS functionality or licences…signage… tagging (in house or outsource?), associated linrary refurb etc..
  • RFID IS a transformational technology, but on its own it is NOT a ‘magic bullet’ or panacea for all ills it’s success or failure is dependent on many external factors You need to have a strategy for: The implications for your staff (which are huge!) ‏ What services you plan to introduce / improve / cut costs on via rfid The impact on your end users The environment into which you introduce RFID – is your library suitably laid out? How it will interact with your LMS – talk to your supplier early, especially about SIP2 (compliance with v2.2 of standard, cost of Sip licences) ‏ Overall you need a holistic business plan with a remit far wider than the technology itself
  • Regardless of Procurement method, start with a specification Clear & Comprehensive – Not only does this help clarify YOUR mind on what you want, but this will form the basis of the contract between you and your chosen supplier, so vital you get this right! Functions as well as hardware – not just how many terminals, but do you want multiple language interfaces? Do you want renewal functions, dual issue / return functions etc.. Function not process – WHAT you want to do, don’t be proscriptive about HOW that is done – that’s up to the supplier to explain & justify if necessary to you Standards – most critical one being ISO 28560-2, and the UK National Profile. Lack of standards compliance WILL come back to haunt you. Thankfully most current UK vendors support this (RFID Alliance) ‏ Spend time on the spec, get it right and it will be an immense aid in choosing the right RFID system *for you*. Time invested here will pay dividends later in the project
  • Specification can be a time / resource intensive task & quite specialised For something like a Library Management System you can get an off the shelf specification like UKCS (United Kingdom Core Specification), no such ‘official’ specification exists for RFID Options: Start from scratch – daunting, time consuming, where’s your ‘peer review’ in case you miss something Shared information – colleagues who have gone before are often open to sharing their work – you can mix & match this with your own ideas ORILS – put together on basis of 2 implementations, with input from the UK community Released under Creative Commons license so you can use ‘as is’, remix it, add, take away, whatever suits you – there is no true ‘one size fits all’, only a good basic framework to start from
  • Your specification should end up looking something like this… Remember to include 1) Background information on the supplier – how many libraries, stock levels, opening hours etc.. 2) Required hardware – how many tags, SSU’s, staff stations, do you want an automated sorter, smart shelves etc.. 3) Required Functionality – both the ‘standard’ stuff e.g. issue, return etc..and specific requirements e.g. self payment, use of smartcards etc.. 4) Service expectations – 2 fold – what YOU expect as a service to deliver e.g. 24 hour opening, 90% self service etc.. And what YOU expect from the supplier in terms of delivery 5) Training & Support – supplier’s training plan, availability of documentation, support – what level of response, office hours or 7 day, preventative maintenance, costs… 6) Future Development – rather nebulous, but is there a clear vision & commitment on suppliers part to pushing the technology forward 7) Project plan – just an outline here, giving key date s& activities supplier would expect to meet as part of the contract
  • Sub £25k – 3 quotes £25k - £139k – tender process (non EU) ‏ £139,853 + VAT and above – EU Procurement Regulations apply ISO28560 means interoperability i.e. you *could* buy tags from 1 supplier, SSU’s from another, a sorter from a 3 rd etc… Suspect this will come into play more when renewing hardware as for 1 st tender librarians (being conservative with a small ‘c’) will tend to go for a single relationship EU Tender Frameworks / Catalist etc..can sometimes avoid the need for a full tender process (where an agreement is in place) ‏ but have some serious limitations in terms of RFID procurement Several different EU Tender procedures, but most common are Open , and to a lesser extent Competitive Dialogue Your Procurement Dept will have a view & a preference – consult them!
  • This is based around the EU Open Tender process since that is the most common. Timeline varies, depending on whether you have issued a Prior Information Notice (PIN), whether advert is paper or electronic etc.. PQQ - useful in winnowing out plainly unsuitable tenderers Pre-Tender Briefing – useful method of talking to / engaging suppliers as you cannot communicate directly with individual suppliers outside the tender framework once entered Supplier Demos – a MUST – and get staff from ALL levels along – ask awkward questions..and get written clarifications on any major points afterwards – the supplier responses will then form part of the bid & thus the contract Reference Sites – contact references – visit sites if possible – money & time well spent! Scoring & evaluation Try to find a balance between cost, functionality and supplier services. In particular on cost, take into account both startup and project lifetime / ongoing figures.
  • Selection criteria & scoring should be ; Fair & transparent Equally applied across all candidates Be prepared to give feedback – written / oral / in person Very much a cliché, but RFID is a genuine long termpartnership approach – ensure you feel comfortable with long term strategy of your supplier, not least in terms of where they / the product is likely to go in the future Finally, cost not always a reliable indicator of quality , and cheapest is very rarely the best value If you’ve done your homework on the companies and the specification, you should be able to pick the best fit *for your project* ..one size does not fit all.
  • Once decision has been made, each tenderer needs to be informed in writing (email is sufficient). Each supplier should be provided with their own score, and the winner’s overall score for comparison. There is then a 10 day ‘standstill’ period before any contract can be signed – unsuccessful bidders may raise a challenge to any decision during this period (rare!). Unsuccessful bidders may also request detailed feedback, which can be given orally, in writing or in person – you need to be able to justify your scoring & decision The order can be placed at end of the Standstill period…contracts are usually drawn up by legal depts on both sides, and may take a little longer to formalise – you can proceed while this is ongoing. Expect an initial project planning meeting, during which you & supplier will formalise the overall plan & settle on delivery & milestone dates.
  • Usual order of implementation Items you need to tag your stock – tags / tagging stations ..then you need to actually do it Stock wand is useful to have early on to do quality checking ..SSU’s usually come close to go =live date Security gates are last thing to be installed before go-live Sorter usually done straight before or just after Training- do it close to go-live date as possible ..post implementation support includes the inevitable ‘snagging list’, and will usually last for a short period until implenentation is’signed off’ and normal support comes into force Test, test, test – know what you are getting works as you wish at EVERY stage

Rfid South West Wales Area Partnership (SWAP) Presentation Transcript

  • 1. RFID : The ‘Why?’, the ‘How?’ and moving forward Mark Hughes Head of Collections Swansea University
  • 2. Agenda 1.0 The initial questions 2.0 Knowing what you want - the specification 3.0 Procurement methods 4.0 The procurement process 5.0 Choosing a supplier 6.0 What happens next? 7.0 Lessons from experience 8.0 Future gazing…
  • 3. 1.0 The initial questions
    • Formalise ideas on:
    • Strategy
    • Resource
    • Timescale
    • Budget
    • Know:
    • why you want it
    • what you want
    • what you can commit to get it!
    http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/x/M/iraq_checklist.jpg http://www.allposters.co.uk/-sp/Mom-Says-I-m-Cool-Posters_i1037548_.htm http://junya17.wordpress.com/2009/03/
  • 4. 1.0 The initial questions http://anmika.com/page_1237046631862.html
    • Transformational technology
    • *Not* a 'Magic Bullet'
    • Staffing
    • Services
    • Customers / users
    • Environment
    • LMS
    • Holistic businesspPlan
    • Warning!: Innovation without a strategy may end in expensive failure!
    http://www.lboro.ac.uk/library/images/news/VC.jpg http://www.cbb-middleware.com/ibit/Products_RFID_Library%20Management.htm
  • 5. 2.0 Knowing what you want – the specification
    • Clear & comprehensive ‏
    • Functions as well as hardware
    • Focus on function NOT process
    • Standards (ISO 28560-2) ‏ / the RFID Alliance / UK National Profile
    • ..the most critical part of the process..
    http://www.donationcoder.com/Reviews/Archive/WordProcs/Screenshots/06-word07-spec.jpg
  • 6.
    • There is no equivalent to UKCS for RFID
    • Start from scratch
    • Shared information
    • or use the Open RFID in Libraries Specification (ORILS) ‏
    • Free under Creative Commons license
    http://groups.google.com/group/ORILS 2.0 Knowing what you want – the specification
  • 7. 2.0 Knowing what you want – the specification
    • Background information
    • Required hardware
    • Required functionality
    • Service expectations
    • Training & support
    • Future development
    • Outline project plan
  • 8. 3.0 Procurement methods
    • Depending on the budget..
    • ‘ 3 Quotes’
    • Tender Process
    • Other – Purchasing Consortia / Frameworks
    • European Tender
        • Open
        • Competitive Dialogue
    • Talk to your procurement department
  • 9. 4.0 The procurement process
    • Minimum 82 day process, often 100+
    • Pre Qualification Questionnaire - Optional
        • ‘ Pre Tender Briefing’ – Optional
        • Supplier demonstrations
        • Written clarifications
        • References & site visits
        • Evaluation Criteria – ORILS
  • 10. 5.0 Choosing a supplier http://youngmillionairegroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/choices.jpg
    • Selection criteria & scoring
    • Fair / Equal / Transparent
        • Partnership
        • ..long term development & support
        • High cost = High quality?
        • Cheapest = Best value?
        • Which package suits YOUR specific needs?
  • 11. 6.0 What happens next?
    • Written notifications with scores & winner's score
    • 10 day 'Standstill'
    • Feedback opportunity
    • Order / contracts exchange
    • Project meetings
    • Project plan with delivery dates
    http://www.portsmouth.gov.uk/images/letterwriting_rdax_225x326.jp g
  • 12. 6.0 What happens next?
    • Tags / tagging station delivery
    • Tagging of stock
    • Delivery of stock wand
    • Installation of SSU's
    • Installation of security gates
    • Installation of sorter
    • Training
    • Go-live
    • Post implementation support
    • ..test at every step!
  • 13.
    • For you
        • It doesn't stop here...
        • 'Educating' users
        • Supporting staff
        • Snagging list / 'Tinkering'
        • Probably stock management
        • Future development
    6.0 What happens next? Sisyphus; Hans von Stuck, 1920
  • 14. 7.0 Lessons from experience
    • The Good
        • The tech bit is actually easy
        • It’s got the ‘wow’ factor
        • It does free up staff time
        • Staff can be great advocates
        • Users generally like it & use it
        • Machines can get lots of use
        • Soon vital to service delivery
        • Competitive supplier market
    • The Bad
        • ..but you need to do your research
        • ..has the rest of your library?
        • ..but not as much as you’d think
        • ..but beware if they are negative
        • .but they do need some guidance
        • ..wear & tear – maintenance?
        • ..what happens when it breaks down?
        • ..caveat emptor
    You can avoid most of this through good planning!
  • 15. 8.0 Future Gazing.. The marketplace
    • ISO 28560 is a game-changer
    • Supplier market will initially grow
    • … then consolidate
    • Tag prices will continue to fall
    • Hardware prices will fall more slowly
    • Closer links to LMS suppliers
    • RFID as a core service
    The Portrait of Michel de Nostredame (Nostradamus), a French Renaissance Medicine & Astrologer, painted by his son César de Nostredame (1553-1630?) about 1614 A.D. 16cm x 18cm
  • 16. 8.0 Future Gazing.. The technology
    • Competition will breed innovation amongst suppliers
    • ..Smart Shelves, Intelligent Displays, tunnel readers
    • … the brick wall of SIP2
    • New Comms standards
    • User centered innovation
    • ..’the Internet of Things’
  • 17.
    • LIB RFID UK mailing list
    • https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=LIB-RFID-UK
      • BIC / CILIP e4libraries
        • http://www.bic.org.uk/e4libraries/11/RFID-/
      • Mick Fortune's Blog
        • http://www.mickfortune.com/Wordpress/
      • ORILS website
    • http://groups.google.com/group/ORILS
      • Richard Wallis’ recent presentations
    • http://www.slideshare.net/rjw
    8.0 Further Reading
  • 18. Thank You Mark Hughes m.j.hughes@swansea.ac.uk http://twitter.com/Mark_H_Swansea http://www.slideshare.net/Mark_H_Swansea