Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
DORA and the reinvention of research assessment
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

DORA and the reinvention of research assessment

232

Published on

Given at the EIFL General Assembly 2013

Given at the EIFL General Assembly 2013

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
232
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. DORA and reinventing research assessment EIFL, Istanbul, November, 2013 Mark Patterson, Executive Director, eLife
  • 2. Outline • A few words about eLife • Research assessment – old and new approaches • DORA recommendations
  • 3. Funders taking direct action
  • 4. eLife: motivations
  • 5. eLife: motivations Swift, fair, decisive process Exploit digital media Serve science Open access
  • 6. %PubMed available as open access in PMC 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 7. Researchers (authors and readers) Institutions Librarians Funders Research assessment The public Policy makers Publishers
  • 8. What journal? What impact factor?
  • 9. The impact factor is… • a journal-based metric • proprietary • incomplete http://www.flickr.com/photos/m2w2/191545978/sizes/z/in/photostream/
  • 10. • a journal-based metric • proprietary • incomplete http://www.flickr.com/photos/m2w2/191545978/sizes/z/in/photostream/
  • 11. Citations Policy and practice Media Usage Twitter Textbooks Reference managers Wikipedia
  • 12. v10
  • 13. New metrics and indicators of scholarship • From one measure to many • From journal to article • From one output to many
  • 14. • Recommendations for publishers, funders, institutio ns, metrics suppliers, and researchers • >9000 signatories http://www.flickr.com/photos/24736216@N07/7758828268/ (CC BY-NC2.0)
  • 15. Three themes • eliminate the use of impact factors in decisions about funding and careers • opportunities provided by online publication (such as new indicators of significance and impact) • assess research on its own merits
  • 16. Funding agencies and institutions • be transparent about processes • base judgement on outputs rather than journal names and metrics • consider multiple outputs/outcomes • consider multiple metrics and indicators
  • 17. Taking steps to improve assessment (1) “Varmus wants to replace a section that now lists major publications with a narrative describing the investigator's five major accomplishments.” Science, 25 October 2013
  • 18. Taking steps to improve assessment (2) Sandra L. Schmid, chair of the Department of Cell Biology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. “We believe we can recognize excellence that has been missed by journal editors.” Applicants for faculty positions provide a cover letter describing: (1) most significant scientific accomplishment as a graduate student (2) most significant scientific accomplishment as a postdoc (3) overall goals/vision for their research program (4) experience and qualifications that make them able to achieve those goals Science Careers, 3 September 2013
  • 19. Taking steps to improve assessment (3) No sub-panel will make any use of journal impact factors, rankings, lists or the perceived standing of publishers in assessing the quality of research outputs. An underpinning principle of the REF is that all types of research and all forms of research outputs across all disciplines shall be assessed on a fair and equal basis.
  • 20. Publishers • don’t promote the impact factor (ideally) • provide new metrics and indicators • make reference lists available as open data • promote responsible authorship and author contributions
  • 21. Metrics service providers • be transparent about methods • make data open • consider how to respond to gaming
  • 22. Metrics service providers
  • 23. Researchers • challenge use impact factor in research assessment • promote assessment on the basis of research content • use new metrics/indicator to support your own career
  • 24. Summary • Current methods are poor • New approaches are possible • And steadily, improvements are being made
  • 25. • Signing DORA is a start, but what happens next? • Further discussion amongst key stakeholders • Identify specific actions • Monitor and report progress http://www.flickr.com/photos/24736216@N07/7758828268/ (CC BY-NC2.0)
  • 26. Thank you Mark Patterson m.patterson@elifesciences.org

×