Audit and Enterprise Risk Services



International Financial Reporting Standards for U.S. Companies:
Implications of an a...
Why are many companies considering IFRS?                                                       Key benefits of IFRS
Curren...
Global acceptance of IFRS is not without                             2. Evaluate how IFRS reporting will impact the organi...
Moving Forward
Market forces, regulatory activity, the promise of efficiencies,
and other factors are pushing IFRS into th...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

International Financial Reporting Standards for U.S. Companies:

774 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
774
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

International Financial Reporting Standards for U.S. Companies:

  1. 1. Audit and Enterprise Risk Services International Financial Reporting Standards for U.S. Companies: Implications of an accelerating global trend The movement toward International Financial Reporting • IFRS is now used for public reporting purposes in over 100 Standards (IFRS) as a single set of globally accepted countries, ranging from Australia to the United Kingdom. accounting standards is quickly gathering momentum. IFRS Others countries are expected to follow in the next few years, is rapidly gaining acceptance around the world, spurring U.S. including Israel (2008), Chile (2009), Korea (2009), Brazil companies to assess the potential implications of adopting (2010), and Canada (2011). the standard. Among recent developments that have The bottom line: By 2011, almost every country around the heightened interest among U.S. companies are the following: world could be using IFRS to some extent, including the • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a United States. “concept release” in August 2007 that solicits input on whether U.S. issuers should be permitted to prepare their What is IFRS? financial statements using IFRS or U.S. GAAP for SEC reporting purposes. The majority of comments received on IFRS is a set of accounting principles that is rapidly gaining the concept release expressed support for U.S. issuers using acceptance on a worldwide basis. These standards are: IFRS. Subsequently, the SEC will consider whether to issue a • published by the London-based International Accounting “proposing release” (formally proposing the rule), which could Standards Board (IASB) come during 2008. It is expected that U.S. companies will have the option of using IFRS by 2010 or 2011. • more focused on objectives and principles and less reliant on detailed rules than U.S. GAAP • The SEC approved a final rule in November 2007 that eliminated the requirement for foreign private issuers using Since 2002, efforts have been under way to converge IFRS IFRS to reconcile to U.S. GAAP; the rule is effective for and U.S. GAAP. periods ending after November 15, 2007. IFRS Timeline SEC issues “Concept Release” on allowing U.S. issuers a Development choice between IFRS of the SEC and U.S. GAAP “IFRS Roadmap” SEC eliminates the require- by then Chief ment for foreign private Final report on the Accountant issuers that use IFRS “equivalence” of national Don Nicolaison to reconcile to U.S. GAAP GAAPs and IFRS 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 Agreement between FASB European Reaffirmation of Expected issuance of SEC and IASB on a plan to Commission issues the convergence “proposing release” on U.S issuers potentially have formally undertake efforts to draft report on efforts by the FASB allowing U.S. issuers a choice the ability to use converge U.S. GAAP and IFRS “equivalence” of and IASB; Norwalk of preparing financial IFRS for SEC reporting (the “Norwalk Agreement”) national GAAPs Agreement is statements under either IFRS purposes and IFRS updated or U.S. GAAP European Commission begins project on SEC and Committee of European “equivalence” of Securities Regulators (CESR) launch the national GAAPs and IFRS “SEC/CESR Work Plan” to address application issues relating to the implementation of IFRS
  2. 2. Why are many companies considering IFRS? Key benefits of IFRS Currently, U.S. companies that raise capital or operate in Reduced complexity, greater transparency, increased foreign countries often have to prepare multiple sets of comparability, and improved efficiency are all potential financial statements to comply with the local GAAP of various benefits of IFRS: countries. This is no easy task and can create a significant burden. For global companies, it requires staying on top of Investors –The investment community is increasingly an array of accounting guidance and preparing different sets looking for high-quality financial information. Investors, of financial statements—efforts that often involve significant in increasing numbers, perceive IFRS as an opportunity to cost and resources. compare companies across global industries. Companies that do not provide this information now may soon need The recent SEC developments have served as a wake-up call to, as shareholders and analysts may expect (or demand) it. for many U.S. executives—especially those at multinational The more that demand for IFRS financial information grows, companies. IFRS is no longer a topic reserved mostly for the more even the playing field becomes, thus allowing foreign private issuers filing statements with the SEC. With investors to have an “apples-to-apples” perspective when the opportunity to file financial statements according to IFRS comparing financial results. within reach, more U.S. companies have greater interest in understanding (and mobilizing around) IFRS and the Capital markets – With IFRS, greater market efficiencies associated benefits. can be realized. A single, global set of accounting standards can encourage both companies and investors to more easily In time, it is highly probable that every company will need to access multiple or foreign markets. In effect, this can help address IFRS in some manner. Therefore, companies would stimulate investment and enable cross-border capital flows. benefit from developing a rational response to the inevitable. Companies – Streamlining financial reporting processes For global organizations, IFRS may represent a significant cost throughout a global operation can eliminate divergent savings opportunity, as it affords the following advantages: accounting systems and enable greater consistency in • Standardized and improved accounting and financial reporting, thereby reducing costs, increasing operational reporting policies – IFRS allows for the development effectiveness, and decreasing the likelihood of potential of a consistent set of accounting and financial reporting errors resulting from the misapplication of standards. Many policies for both local statutory and consolidated reporting, of the elements of IFRS application can be standardized and which improves the comparability of financial information performed centrally. and tax planning. This directly benefits shareholders and analysts looking for consistent, high-quality information to assess companies across borders. Many companies have IFRS on their radar. According to a recent survey by Deloitte & Touche LLP1, approximately 20 • More efficient use and availability of resources percent of respondents would consider adopting IFRS, if given – IFRS provides an opportunity for developing centralized a choice. And almost two-thirds of those companies would accounting processes through a shared-services approach, consider adopting IFRS within the next three years. As more allowing for the efficient use of resources. It also facilitates companies become familiar with IFRS, we believe that interest the development of standardized training programs, will continue to grow. eliminates divergent accounting systems, and could reduce third-party fees related to local statutory reporting. Many Global Fortune 500 companies have already jumped Furthermore, having a single set of accounting standards on the IFRS bandwagon. Within the Global Fortune 500 enhances the ability to train and develop accounting companies, approximately 40 percent currently follow IFRS, personnel throughout the globe. with another 40 percent currently using U.S. GAAP. The • Improved controls – IFRS allows for more control over remaining 20 percent use local GAAP; however, many of these statutory reporting, thereby reducing risks related to companies are located in countries that will be transitioning to penalties and compliance problems at the local level. Many IFRS in the near term, such as Canada and Brazil.2 local statutory reports are prepared through a manual The correlation between the increasing use of IFRS and the conversion from U.S. GAAP. Often there is no worldwide declining use of local GAAP illustrates a powerful global “owner” for statutory reporting. trend—one that more U.S. companies are noticing. It is likely • Better cash management – Dividends that can be paid that by 2011, a clear majority of the largest global companies from subsidiaries are based on local financial statements. could be using IFRS. A change from local GAAP to IFRS can have significant effects on cash dividends, allowing a consistent standard across countries that can improve cash flow planning. 1 The “Global Financial Survey,” conducted by Deloitte & Touche LLP, received responses from senior financial executives from approximately 300 U.S. companies. 2 2 Ibid.
  3. 3. Global acceptance of IFRS is not without 2. Evaluate how IFRS reporting will impact the organization in the future. Take a holistic approach and assess the impact its challenges on aspects such as culture, tax, and financial reporting metrics. Consider whether new IFRS reporting obligations are The movement toward IFRS as a single set of globally accepted surfacing for the organization around the world, and whether accounting and financial reporting standards will entail competitors are moving to IFRS. challenges. For companies and the greater financial reporting community, perhaps the biggest challenge is a cultural one. 3. Analyze the cost and benefits of IFRS adoption. Does IFRS Bringing together accounting standards may be relatively easy help the organization increase the efficiency of its financial compared to coordinating the variety of cultural differences and reporting procedures? What are the costs of implementing perspectives involved in interpreting and applying IFRS; this also IFRS? How long would it take the organization to adopt IFRS involves considering the legal and financial consequences of in a controlled manner? Will the organization be ready if IFRS alleged departures from the standards. becomes mandatory at a certain date? For a multinational company, ensuring that IFRS is applied in a 4. Consider developing an IFRS implementation plan for an globally consistent manner instead of as an amalgam of local effective and efficient conversion. Assess reasonable timelines; versions may involve significant efforts around the creation and evaluate potential approaches to implementation, such as of policies, the modifications of systems, and the training an early adoption plan (with a phased implementation), or an of personnel. With the use of IFRS, companies, auditors, expedited plan in case of an IFRS mandate. Assess what type regulators, and users will need to adapt to an accounting and of approach would be appropriate to meet the unique needs financial reporting framework that requires more judgment of the company. and less reliance on detailed rules and bright lines. Companies will be required to understand base principles and objectives, Transitioning to IFRS is not just about changing accounting how judgments are made, and how they are applied. Such an policies. Adoption impacts all aspects of a company, including approach to accounting requires a change in mindset. financial reporting systems, internal controls, taxes, treasury, cash management, and legal, among others. (See illustration in figure 1.) Converting to IFRS requires a transformation that What should U.S. companies do? involves employees, processes, and systems. Planned and Given the heightened interest and activity around IFRS, U.S. managed properly, the conversion can bring about substantial companies would be well served by taking action now to improvements in the performance of the finance function as develop a greater understanding of IFRS. This involves assessing well as better controls, and reduced costs. the implications of current and potential SEC developments on their organizations, and determining an appropriate course of Figure 1. The adoption of IFRS affects more than a company’s action for responding to a shift toward IFRS. accounting policies, processes, and people. We believe that CFOs, CEOs, audit committees, and boards Ultimately, every aspect of a company’s business of directors should consider the following in an effort to and operation is affected potentially. understand the impact of IFRS on their company: Collateral Impact 1. Assess how the organization is currently exposed to IFRS. U.S. companies with the following characteristics may have more incentives than most to consider adoption of IFRS: � Dual books (IFRS/Local ns � Performance Core Impact Statutory) • A parent company outside the U.S. that now reports under io Ta metrics at Thin x � IFRS. This can include investors of the parent as well. Budgeting Accounting and er � capitalization Op � Compensation Financial Reporting rules • Investors (including those involved in joint venture policies � Accounting policy � Tax rules - arrangements) outside the U.S. that now report under IFRS. � Process, systems, and people- application uncertainty related changes to country • Foreign subsidiaries that have local or statutory IFRS statutory reporting and tax compliance reporting requirements. � Global financial consolidation • Companies with complex cross-border structures and whether there are IFRS requirements resulting from such structures. Treasury • Companies operating in industries which have major � Debt covenants players using IFRS for financial reporting purposes. � Financing � Dividend management Key questions to consider: Does the organization currently have IFRS reporting obligations for statutory or other purposes? How is the organization dealing with these reporting obligations? What is the organization’s current risk exposure under existing IFRS reporting requirements? 3
  4. 4. Moving Forward Market forces, regulatory activity, the promise of efficiencies, and other factors are pushing IFRS into the headlines and to the top of senior executives’ agendas across corporate America. The movement toward IFRS is real. Companies must ask themselves: Can we afford not to investigate the impact of IFRS? Resources & Contacts Deloitte & Touche LLP has extensive experience in For more information, please contact: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). With thousands of IFRS-experienced professionals in our global D.J. Gannon network, we provide a comprehensive array of services Leader, IFRS Centre of Excellence – Americas related to IFRS. As a multidisciplinary organization, we can Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP help companies address a wide range of IFRS issues. We 202-220-2110 offer companies assistance with: dgannon@deloitte.com • Evaluating the potential impacts of IFRS Joel Osnoss • Assessing readiness for IFRS conversions Leader, Global IFRS Service Line • Implementing IFRS conversions, providing support with Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP technical research, project management, and training 212-436-3352 • Addressing the implications of IFRS in such areas as tax, josnoss@deloitte.com finance operations, technology, and valuation Alfred Popken Principal, Deloitte & Touche LLP 212-436-3693 apopken@deloitte.com About this publication This publication contains general information only and Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP are not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, their affiliates and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein, its member firms, and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu is an organization of member firms around the world devoted to excellence in providing professional services and advice, focused on client service through a global strategy executed locally in more than 140 countries. With access to the deep intellectual capital of approximately 150,000 people worldwide, Deloitte delivers services in four professional areas — audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services — and serves more than 80 percent of the world’s largest companies, as well as large national enterprises, public institutions, locally important clients, and successful, fast-growing global companies. Services are not provided by the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Verein, and, for regulatory and other reasons, certain member firms do not provide services in all four professional areas. As a Swiss Verein (association), neither Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu nor any of its member firms have any liability for each other’s acts or omissions. Each of the member firms is a separate and independent legal entity operating under the names “Deloitte,” “Deloitte & Touche,” “Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu,” or other related names. In the United States, Deloitte & Touche USA LLP is the U.S. member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and services are provided by the subsidiaries of Deloitte & Touche USA LLP (Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and their subsidiaries), and not by Deloitte & Touche USA LLP. The subsidiaries of the U.S. member firm are among the nation’s leading professional services firms, providing audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services through nearly 40,000 people in more than 90 cities. Known as employers of choice for innovative human resources programs, they are dedicated to helping their clients and their people excel. For more information, please visit the U.S. member firm’s Web site at www.deloitte.com. 4 Member of Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

×