MPCA Integrating Behavioral Health Project - Presentation Transcript
BH Integration: from the ordinary to the extraordinary Beverly Hammerstrom MPCA Conference Traverse City, Michigan September 17, 2007
Overview
History
Define the problem today
Why now?
Exactly do we mean by integrated care?
Examples of models
Next steps
Let’s first look at insurance…….
Group health insurance first offered in 1910 by Montgomery Ward
Became readily available in the US in the late 1930’s
Prior to this primarily offered on lives, houses, cars, etc.
Covered only catastrophic losses
In-patient, emergency room
Employer-sponsored health insurance became popular in the 1950’s after the IRS ruled it was a tax-deductible business expense
1960 – Private Sector (75%); Public Sector (25%); but most private sector plans did not cover MH (carve outs)
Federal Health Insurance Policies
By early 1960’s clamor began for federal health insurance policies, primarily to aid poor and elderly
Medicare
Medicaid
By end of 1960’s – federal share = 40%
How did physical and mental health become separated?
50 years ago – most people with mental illness were living in asylums
more than 20,000 people in Michigan were living in state or county-operated facilities
1960’s – due to efforts of John Kennedy and advances in medicine thinking began to change
Michigan PA 258 of 1974 – “tipping point” from institutional care to community-based system
1980-1990 – reduced by 50% number of people living in tax-funded institutions
Today only less than 2000 patients in state facilities
Promises Made; Promises Broken
Money was intended to follow consumers into the community programs
Employer-paid insurance had no reason to pick up the bill; most didn’t
Operating two systems – state & community; never enough money to fund both
Community-based mental health system has ALWAYS been under funded
Shift in state’s directions
Decreasing revenues have led to a shift in direction to maximize federal dollars and draw down more Medicaid match funds
Incentives put in place in 1995 to encourage CMH’s to become authorities; froze county match
Most treated in county-based systems today for mental illness are Medicaid
Few general fund dollars available to treat other populations
Guidelines specify they must treat the most severe first
Just How Big is the Problem
Nearly 44 million Americans (26% of the population) experience a mental health problem annually
Only 5% of those suffering from a mental health problem receive treatment from a mental health professional
Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) are not required to serve the uninsured population
What does this mean for Primary Health Care Providers?
More and more needing behavioral health services are seeking it through primary care providers
95% seek treatment from a family physician – many for physical complaints
92% of all elderly patients receive MH care from PCP
90% of most common complaints have no organic basis
70% of federally-funded health centers report on-site mental health treatment and counseling; 50% provide substance abuse treatment and counseling (2003)
Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Low-income PC Patients 7% 10% Eating Disorder 7% 17% Alcohol Abuse 11% 36% Anxiety Disorder 16% 33% Mood Disorder 28% 51% At least one psych DX General PC Low-income Disorder
More facts………..
70-80% of all psychotropic medications are prescribed within primary care settings, sometimes inappropriately
67% of psychoactive agents prescribed by PCP
80% of antidepressants prescribed by PCP
About ½ the time, mental health problems go undetected in primary care settings
Even when diagnosed, these problems tend to be under-treated
MH outcomes in primary care patients only slightly better than spontaneous recovery
Compliance Issues
As few as 1 in 4 patients referred to specialty MH or CD make the first appointment
Nationally = 45-75%
“no shows” from 5-15% at first integrated clinic in Washtenaw County
50-56% non-adherence to psychoactive medications within first 4 weeks
Untreated/Under-treated Patients
Over-utilize medical services
Visit physician twice as often as those receiving appropriate care
Seek treatment in emergency rooms when in crisis
People with persistent depression have annual adjusted medical costs 70% higher than those without depression
Why Patients Seek Mental Health Services in Primary Care Settings
Limited access to specialty service providers
Lack of adequate insurance coverage
Cultural beliefs
Eligibility requirements for public mental health services
Trust their own physician
Stigma
Primary Care Concurs
Committee on the Future of Primary Care
The committee recommends the reduction of financial and organizational disincentives for the expanded role of primary care in the provision of mental health services. It further recommends the development and evaluation of collaborative care models that integrate primary care and mental health services more effectively. These models should involve both primary care clinicians and mental health professionals.
Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Low-income PC Patients 7% 10% Eating Disorder 7% 17% Alcohol Abuse 11% 36% Anxiety Disorder 16% 33% Mood Disorder 28% 51% At least One Psychiatric Dx General PC Population Low-income Patients Psychiatric Disorder
Low-income Patients with Psychiatric Dx
35% saw their PCP in the past 3 months
90% of low-income patients with psychiatric Dx preferred integrated care
Morbidity and Mortality Rates
People with serious mental illness are dying nearly three decades earlier (on average) than general population
High prevalence of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Newer medications for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia can exacerbate metabolic risks
BH Providers less likely to screen and monitor regularly
Recommendations…….
Promote Coordinated and Integrated mental Health and Physical Health Care for Persons with SMI
Promote integration of general health and mental health records
Revise laws and policies to support communication between providers
And………
Adopt a Policy that Mental Health and Physical Healthcare should be Integrated
Implement Care Coordinated Models
Assure financing methods for service improvements. Include reimbursement for coordination activities, case management……..
Establish rates adequate to assure access to primary care by persons with SMI
New Freedom Commission
Chapter on Integration in the Final Report as well as several Action Agenda activities related to integration
Recommended development of a comprehensive state plan across all mental health activities that should include a requirement to address primary care integration issues
Why Now?
“ Research demonstrates that mental health is key to overall physical health. Therefore, improving services for individuals with mental illness requires close attention to how mental health care and general medical care interact. While mental health and physical health are clearly connected, a chasm exists between the mental health and general health care systems in financing and practice.
The Recommendation…….
“Commission suggests that collaborative care models should be widely implemented in primary health care settings and reimbursed by public and private insurance.”
Goal #5:
The Commission recommends that Medicare, Medicaid, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and other Federal and State-sponsored health insurance programs and private insurers identify and consider payment for core components of evidence-based collaborative care including: case management, disease management, supervision of case managers, consultations to primary care providers by qualified mental health specialists that do not involve face-to-face contact with clients
Changes at the Federal Level
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Acts (OBRA) of 1987 and 1989 expanded Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements to include clinical psychologists and master’s level social workers practicing in rural areas
HRSA has provided grant funding to FQHC’s to increase behavioral health staff (no longer available)
And………..
PIN 2004-05 – Medicaid funding for BH in FQHC’s
All new FQHC applications must include
HRSA is offering grant funds for Developing Integrated Networks in rural areas and for developing networks
Michigan Task Force Concurs
Mental health and physical health should be more integrated……..
An ideal system is integrated; for consumers entering a confusing array of services, there is no wrong door.
Develop specific sustainable models of collaboration at the state and local levels maximizing resources earmarked for providing mental health services.
Goal #5
“Coordinate the delivery of mental health services by both federally qualified health clinics and community mental health programs.”
The writing’s on the wall, folks!
and it’s the right thing to do
NCCBH Goals for Integration
Every provider of public BH services assures assessment of health status as well as mental status and has specific protocols in place for medically monitoring all consumers receiving second generation antipsychotic medications. An integral part of their service for consumers is to assure that each person is connected to a primary care medical home and there are specific mechanisms between the BH and PCP for coordination of services.
NCCBH Goals continued……..
The safety net population in every community served by providers of public BH services and by CHC’s has seamless access to both BH and physical health care. There is a strong working partnership among these providers, with roles defined, referral protocols in place and cross-placement of clinical staff.
What is Integrated Care?
Not simply placing a MH specialist inside a medical setting
Medically oriented; pace fits with the ecology of the medical setting
Covers problems not typically seen in specialty mental health care
Focuses on population management and on supporting and enhancing the PCP who leads the integrated care team
Integrated care………
Includes a treatment plan containing behavioral and medical elements rather than two separate treatment plans
Is a health care model in which physical health and mental health clinicians partner to manage the treatment of mental health disorders in the primary setting
Elements of BH Integration
Financial or structural integration does not assure clinical integration
Clinical integration helps focus on what consumers need
Public sector efforts focused on financial integration (carve-ins) have had limited success
Clinical integration requires financial and structural supports
Public sector financing is a major barrier to achieving clinical integration in most settings
Benefits of Integration
Improved detection of behavioral health disorders
Significant increase in patients receiving recommended care and positive clinical outcome
Higher levels of patient adherence to treatment
Better clinical outcome than by treatment in either sector alone
More benefits……..
Improved consumer and provider satisfaction
Improved PCP skills in medication prescription practices
Increased confidence in PCP in managing BH conditions
And it saves money……..
More cost effective treatment
Can reduce overall cost and reduce over-utilization of the medical system
Between 20 and 40% of total medical care cost savings
Up to 70% saved in treating older Americans
Oahu Study………
126,000 patients
40% reduction of costs by a sample of high utilizers
Reduced medical utilization by 21%
McDonnell-Douglas Corp. 1989
Provided in-house counseling for substance abuse, depression, family problems for employees – 20,000/4 years
Lowered health care cost of not only employees but also dependants
34-44% reduction in absences
60-80% lower attrition rate
Saved $4 in health, absences, and attrition for every $1 spent
PCP prefer integrated care: PRISM-E Study of Elderly
Better communication between PCP and MHP (93%)
Less stigma for patients (93%)
Better coordination of care (92%)
Better care of depression (64%)
Better care of anxiety (76%)
Better care of alcohol problems (66%)
Hypothesis:
Better identification of behavioral health needs and better targeting and managing of treatment to those needs using collaboration will lead to more cost-effective treatment, higher compliance and better patient outcomes.
It should be a slam dunk……
Getting there is not a “walk in the park”
Financial Barriers
Not reimbursed for collaborative work
Revenue silos
Billing requirements; record-keeping regulations
Firewalls in communication systems
Legal landmines
Stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems
Lack of resources
Human (providers; staff)
Funding
Time/Space
Interest
Proper tools
Language and Cultural Differences
The Great Cultural Divide……..
Primary Care Docs
10-15 minute blocks
Deal one-on-one w/other physicians
Find it difficult to deal with interdisciplinary team
Medical records short, concise summaries of the diagnosis, treatment and outcome
Language = patients
Psychiatrists
Language = clients or consumers
45-60 minute sessions
Time with consumers considered sacrosanct
Behavioral health records are long and complex
Contain goals and objectives
Variety of provided services; may be re-evaluated over time
Contain consumer input
Training…………
Most primary care physicians receive little training in psychiatry
Most psychiatric specialty training does not provide much training in primary care issues
Neither receives significant training in collaborative, integrated practices arrangements
Barriers Identified by Michigan FQHC’s
Funds to employ staff
Limited availability of behavioral health providers
Limited space and staff
Staff resistance
Ownership of medical records; HIPPA
Sharing of revenue sources
Three World View: Three Languages
Clinical
“Achievement” of health goals
Goal of care = quality
Financial
Bottom line
Price/value
Structural/Operational
Productivity
Efficiency
Minkoff’s View (Medical Director of Choate Integrated Behavioral Care, Woburn, MA)
Clinical integration
Dually trained clinicians or interdisciplinary teams
Clinical practice integration
Formal collaboration and consultation mechanisms, required screening practices, collaboration practices built into service protocols
Balance clinical integration with…..
Programmatic integration
Structural integration
Behavioral and primary care services under a common administrative authority which can create standards for collaboration and clinical integration
Physical integration
Co-location of services in either direction
And………..
Fiscal integration
Mental health and primary care services under a common funding stream which can be utilized to promote any of the other’s activities
Doherty’s FIVE LEVELS OF COLLABORATION Doherty’s Five Levels, FULLY INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; NEED-TO-KNOW ACCESS FOR ALL PRACTITIONERS SHARED ALLEGIANCE TO BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL SYSTEMS PARADIGM NO COMMON LAN-GUAGE OR UNDER-STANDING OF OTHERS’ CULTURE LITTLE UNDERSTAND-ING OF OTHERS’ CULTURE SHARED VISION BASIC APPRECIA-TION OF OTHERS’ ROLE & CULLTURE APPRECIATION OF OTHERS’ ROLES LITTLE SHARED RESPONSIBILITY LIMITED COMMUNICATION REGULAR COLLABORATIVE TEAM MEETINGS SOME DATA SHARING BUT SEPARATE DATA SETS NO SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO COLLABORATION LINE STAFF WORK TOGETHER ON SOME CASES SEPARATE DATA SYSTEMS; LIMITED SHARING INTEGRATED FUNDING WITH RE-SOURCES SHARED ACROSS NEEDS; MAXIMIZATION OF BILLING AND SUPPORT STAFF SEPARATE FUNDING WITH SHARED ON-SITE EXPENSES; SHARED STAFFING & INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN WORKS WITH CLINICIAN ON SITE RATHER THAN PSYCHIATRIST SEPARATE FUND-ING SYSTEMS SEPARATE FUND- ING SYSTEMS; NO RESOURCE SHARING SAME SYSTEMS; SEAMLESS; ONE TREATMENT PLAN; ON-GOING CONSULTATION COORDINATED TREATMENT PLAN; REGULAR FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION TWO PHYSICIANS; TWO TREATMENT PLANS; SOME INTERACTION DUE TO PROXIMITY OCCASIONAL PLAN SHARING; SEPARATE & DISTINCT SERVICES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT TREATMENT PLAN AND SERVICES ONE FRONT DOOR; SHARED SITE; ONE VISIT FOR ALL NEEDS SHARED SITES SHARED FACILITY; MAY SHARE RECEPTION AREA TWO FRONT DOORS; SEPARATE FACILITIES TWO FRONT DOORS; SEPARATE FACILITIES CLOSE-FULLY INTEGRATED CLOSE-PARTLY INTEGRATED BASIC ON SITE BASIC AT DISTANCE BASIC
Bureau of Primary Health Care Model………..
Model I
Referral Relationship
Model II
Co-location
Teams working separately
Model III
On-site; shared cases between BH and PCP
Model IV
Integrated Care; BH specialist an active member of primary care team
A very basic on-site integrated model
Physicians remain in charge of patient’s physical health
Mental health professionals assess for mental illnesses and link clients with appropriate services
Co-location provides “single point of entry”
Collaboration – Contact & Communication
Therapists read medical charts and notes
Physicians read therapy notes
Providers talk in the hallway
Physicians join therapy sessions
Therapists join medical sessions
Conjoint family meetings
Unified treatment team working to best assist patient in physical and mental care
Continuum of Integration BH specialists primary care team members +++++ Integrated Care On-site/shared cases With BH specialist +++ Collaborative Care On-site BH Unit but Separate Team ++ Co-location Preferred Provider Some info exchange + Referral Relationship Traditional BH Specialty Model -- Separate Location and Mission Attributes Desirability Model
Components of an Integrated Model
Behavioral Health Triage
Comprehensive Behavioral Health Assessment
On-site Behavioral Health Treatment
Referral
Consultation
Care monitoring and chronic disease management protocols
On-site Behavioral Health Treatment
May include an array of services
Individual, group, family counseling
Psychotherapy
Psychopharmacological assessment and treatment
Limited by available behavioral health staffing and budgetary capacity
Referrals
Internal referral back to PCP or other BH staff
External referral to specialty BH providers
Other social service components
Housing
Employment
Care monitoring
Chronic psychiatric conditions that can be managed effectively in PC setting
Less complicated cases of depression
Chronic health problems that are result of or complicated by co-morbid psychiatric conditions
Difficulty adjusting to diabetes or cancer
Cherokee Health Systems
Both a community health clinic and a community mental health provider in Tennessee
Opened its first co-located, integrated primary care and behavioral health clinic in 1984
Today Cherokee has 21 sites
Cherokee’s Patient Base
40,000 in 2001
44% sought primary health care
56% sought behavioral health services
57% of population is Medicaid reimbursed on a capitation basis
12% are covered by Medicare
9% covered by federal and state grants
Core Objective = Integration
Entire staff is committed
All staff (accounting, front-line, supporting) are considered essential players in providing integrated care
Weekly case management meeting
include the entire clinical staff
Primary care providers are paid for time required for collaboration
And………
Cherokee offers 12-month, 2000-hour internships to provide “an intensive and diverse clinical training experience within a community health setting”
According to Cherokee……..
……….placement of a behaviorist on each primary care team is crucial to their mission to help ensure that the patients will get the appropriate behavioral care prescribed and recommended.
Next steps……….
Determine where you are on the continuum of care and where you want to be
Might require a stepped approach
Might be different at each location
Will depend upon resources available
Staff, space, time, funding
Don’t reinvent the wheel….
Lots of model programs that have proven successful
Look at them, but then tweak them to meet the individual needs of your center
Washtenaw County WCHO
Delonis Homeless Shelter
Small health clinic open 35 hrs. per week
Nurse Practitioner Clinic
Services to consumers at CMH facility, including smoking cessation classes
Packard Community Clinic
Full-time MSW and 4 hrs. of psychiatric time per week
Ypsilanti Family Practice
½ day per week adult and child psychiatrist on site for consultation and resident training
Corner Health Center
Mental health staffing at center for persons 12-21 and children
National Models That Already Exist
MacArthur
IMPACT
RWJ Depression Disparities
BPHC Health Disparities Program
Washtenaw County Michigan Model
Cherokee Health Systems - Tennessee
A rose by any other name….
If you’ve seen one integrated care program, you’ve seen one integrated care program
Each program should be designed to address the needs in the community and be consistent with the mission and objectives of primary care
Different models lead to different costs and outcomes
Look for ways to partner….
Shared staffing arrangements
Shared services
Don’t overlook opportunities through telemedicine
Opportunities to co-locate
Three Rivers Health
St. Joseph CMH
Dental practice
Look for funding opportunities
HRSA Grants
Foundations
RWJF
Hogg Foundation
Funding CMH Staff at Primary Care Clinics
When the number of shared consumers is >40 (average case load size at CMH), and existing CMH professional and 5 hours of psychiatric time can be allocated to that clinic for the provision of on-site mental health services
Legislation may be needed….
Reimbursement codes
Federal
state
Insurance Laws
Public/Mental Health Code Changes
Allow for partnerships/shared funding streams
Governance
It’s not impossible…….
What’s on the Horizon………
National Learning Collaboratives
National Learning Communities
National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare
0 comments
Post a comment