Powerpoint Presentation from the Final Green Line Extension Community Visioning Process Meeting on 11.2.11

3,267 views

Published on

Powerpoint presentation from the final Green Line Extension Community Visioning Process meeting on 11.2.11

Published in: Technology, Real Estate
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,267
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2,216
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Powerpoint Presentation from the Final Green Line Extension Community Visioning Process Meeting on 11.2.11

  1. 1. Mystic Valley Parkway Green Line Community Visioning Process Pre-Meeting November 2, 2011 1
  2. 2. OverviewPresentation Will Cover: • Overview of the Green Line project • Potential station area for Mystic Valley Parkway • Purpose of this study • Recap of previous meetings 2
  3. 3. Green Line Extension Project Area3
  4. 4. Mystic Valley Parkway Project Area4
  5. 5. Mystic Valley Parkway Visioning ProcessThis process identifies: • Land use changes that are possible within the station area • Benefits from a station and associated transit-oriented development • Potential impacts and mitigation measures • Recommendations for the two cities and MassDOTThis process isn’t: • An assessment of whether or not the Green Line should be extended • A study providing more information on the Phase I Green Line Extension • An engineering study 5
  6. 6. Public Engagement Process Tonight’s Meeting Issue Community Community Community DraftIdentification Questions Opportunities Vision Recommendations Continuous Public Involvement Continuous Stakeholder Outreach 6
  7. 7. Questions? 7
  8. 8. Mystic Valley Parkway Green Line Community Visioning Process Public Meeting #5 November 2, 2011 8
  9. 9. Public Involvement ProcessStakeholder Interviews February 16 Outcome Public Meeting #1 List of Topics to be Kick-Off and Topic Explored in Meeting #2 Meetings with Cities Identification March 30 Outcome Public Meeting #2 Questions AnsweredTopics from Meeting 1 Community Questions and Concerns Responded ToInformation on Transit May 17 Public Meeting #3 OutcomeOriented Development Understand Key Community Assets Community Assets and Preference Poll and Preferences Visual Preferences June 23 OutcomeAssets and Preferences Public Meeting #4 Series of land from Meeting 3 Community Visioning use/development scenarios November 2 Scenarios from Outcome Public Meeting #5 Meeting 4 Set of Recommendations Recommendations to Cities and MassDOT 9
  10. 10. AgendaTonight’s Agenda • Presentation of draft recommendations • Opportunity for Q&A and comment • Meeting evaluation and next steps 10
  11. 11. Keypad Questions 11
  12. 12. Are you ready for the holidays?1. Yes, it’s my favorite time of the year 0%2. Yes, I could use a few days of vacation 0%3. No, it means winter is approaching 0%4. No, I’m already behind on my holiday shopping 0%5. None of the above 0% 10 0 of 200 12
  13. 13. Which category below best describes you? Previous Pick one Meeting ----------1. A concerned resident 0% 51%2. Government (City, Town, State, or Federal) 0% 6%3. Business/property owner 0% 26%4. Non-profit organizations and advocacy groups 0% 9%5. Other 0% 9% 10 0 of 200 13
  14. 14. Where do you live? Previous Meeting1. Medford ---------- 0% 56%2. Somerville 0% 22%3. Arlington 0% 6%4. Cambridge 0% 3%5. Winchester 0% 0%6. Boston 0%7. Other 0% 0% 14% 10 0 of 200 14
  15. 15. Do you own a home or rent? Previous Meeting1. I own a single family home ---------- 0% 57%2. I own a multi-family home (e.g., two-family or triple-decker) 0% 24%3. I own a condominium or townhouse 0% 3%4. I rent my home 0% 16%5. Other (none) 0% 0% 10 0 of 200 15
  16. 16. How long have you lived in the Medford, Previous Somerville, Arlington, or Cambridge area? Meeting ----------1. 0 - 1 Year 0% 3%2. 2 - 5 Years 0% 14%3. 6 - 10 Years 0% 14%4. 11 - 20 Years 0% 28%5. 20+ Years 0% 31%6. I live in another municipality 0% 11% 10 0 of 200 16
  17. 17. What is your age? Previous Meeting1. 0 – 19 ---------- 0% 0%2. 20 – 29 0% 6%3. 30 – 39 0% 17%4. 40 – 49 0% 25%5. 50 – 59 0% 22%6. 60 – 69 0% 22%7. 70 or Better 0% 8% 10 0 of 200 17
  18. 18. Previous How do you identify yourself? Meeting ----------1. White 0% 91%2. Black or African American 0% 0%3. Hispanic or Latino 0% 3%4. Asian 0% 3%5. Other 0% 3%6. Two or more 0% 0% 10 0 of 200 18
  19. 19. Have you attended a Green Line Extension meeting before? Previous Meeting1. Yes ---------- 0% 84%2. No 0% 16% 10 0 of 200 19
  20. 20. Recap Meeting #4 – Community Vision Meeting Purpose: • Develop a series of land use scenarios for the study area • Understand benefits and impacts • Inform MAPC’s understanding of the community’s preferencesFeedback Received: • Create more open space • Strong connectivity between new development and surrounding area • Consider neighborhood character • Mixing uses is good • More senior housing is needed • Keep Whole Foods as neighborhood anchor 20
  21. 21. VisionA well-connected, walkable, bike-able, neighborhoodscale station area that provides new opportunities formixed-income housing, job creation, increased taxrevenue, and access to quality public transit. Newdevelopment must knit into the fabric of the existingneighborhood and provide opportunities for increasingaccess to affordable housing and quality jobs.Connectivity from the surrounding area is critical inmaking the station a part of the neighborhood. 21
  22. 22. Focus Area Sites 4 T1 3 2
  23. 23. Focus Area 1 23
  24. 24. Focus Area 1Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to four floors of mixed-use development • First floor mix of retail and office space • Up to three floors of residential above • Create open space at corner of Mystic Valley Parkway and Boston Avenue Example Images Three-Floor Mixed-Use Four-Floor Mixed-Use http://www.homedesignfind.com 24
  25. 25. Focus Area 2 25
  26. 26. Focus Area 2Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to three floors of office/R&D development • First floor could include small café/restaurant space • Smaller parking structure to support new development Example Images Three-Floor Office Building Three-Floor Office Building 26
  27. 27. Focus Area 3 27
  28. 28. Focus Area 3Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to four floors of senior affordable housing • Allow for construction of affordable townhomes on site • Consolidate senior units into fewer buildings, more open space • Reconstruct new community center for residents on site Example Images Four-Story Senior Housing Townhomes 28
  29. 29. Focus Area 4 29
  30. 30. Focus Area 4 Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to six floors of mixed-use development • Ground floor Whole Foods and small retail space • Up to four floors of residential above • Mix of underground and surface parking Example Images Six-Floor Mixed-Use Six-Floor Mixed-Usehttp://www.rainiervalleypost.com http://www.prlog.org 30
  31. 31. Potential Benefits Potential New Housing Units: • 117 market-rate units • 55 new senior affordable units • 4 new low-income family townhome units Potential Sq.Ft. of Office/Commercial: • 50,000 Sq.Ft. of commercial • 67,000 Sq.Ft. of officePotential Economic Development: • 240 new jobs • Double tax revenue Potential Homeowner Equity: • $25 million in added home equity31
  32. 32. Vision Implementation 32
  33. 33. Land Use and Zoning• Changes to existing land use regulations (zoning) would be needed to allow for the types of development which would lead to the realization of the vision• Design guidelines and a design review process can help to ensure new development respects existing neighborhood character 33
  34. 34. Managing Neighborhood ChangeConcerns We Heard: • Green Line Extension to Mystic Valley Parkway may increase housing values, which may raise property taxes and may displace residents who may be low-income or on a fixed income (such as seniors)Displacement Could Impact: • Low-income homeowners or homeowners on a fixed-income • Low-income renters or renters on a fixed-income • Homeowners on a fixed-income who want to maintain ownership of their home to pass on to their heirs 34
  35. 35. Managing Neighborhood ChangeHomeowners: • 48% of housing units within a half-mile radius are owner- occupied (2,064 units) • Approximately 35% of homeowners within a half-mile radius spend more than 30% of household income on housing costs (Cost Burdened) • 35% of homeowners over the age of 65 are cost burdened • 65% of all homeowners over the age of 65 do not have a mortgage on their home 35
  36. 36. Managing Neighborhood ChangeRenters: • 52% of housing units in the study area are rentals • Approximately 44% of renters are considered cost burdened • 53% of all cost burdened renters are over the age of 65 36
  37. 37. Managing Neighborhood ChangeHomeowners on a Fixed-Income: • Circuit Breaker – State program, tax credit to reduce overall property tax bill for qualified 65 and older homeowners • Accessory Dwelling Unit Bylaw – Homeowners can construct small accessory housing unit on property, could rent for income or use as own residence and rent/sell main house • Add More Affordable Housing – Construct more senior affordable housing, adopt inclusionary zoning • Weatherization Program – Funding to help retrofit existing homes to make them more energy efficient, helps save money on heating and cooling costs 37
  38. 38. Managing Neighborhood Change Potential Impacts on Housing Costs: • Assessed single family home values could increase by up to 15% in the area • A 15% increase in single family home assessed value could generate on average $47k in additional home equity Measures to Ease Property Tax Increase • Estimated property tax increase of $550 • Weatherization program can save $350/year on home heating costs • Circuit breaker, and other policy programs could help ease increased property tax38
  39. 39. Managing Neighborhood ChangeRenters on a Fixed-Income: • Preservation of Existing Units – Deed restrictions, tax incentives to encourage preservation, utilize low-income tax credits to preserve affordability of units • Construct additional senior housing at Walkling Court • Adopt Inclusionary Zoning • Condo Conversion Ordinance – Assistance to renters whose unit is being converted to ownership. Creates notice requirements, relocation assistance, and moving cost assistance 39
  40. 40. Increase ImproveWalk Time at Lighting andIntersection Streetscape Increase Open Space and Walking Paths Improve WalkingConnectivity Increase Improve Walk Time at Mid-Block Intersection Crossings 40
  41. 41. Transportation• Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure • Install pedestrian countdown signals at all intersections with vehicular signals • Upgrade sidewalk ramps to ADA accessibility standards • Install Sharrows along Boston Avenue • Complete shared-use pathway improvements along Mystic River • Ensure adequate and safe bicycle parking in the station area 41
  42. 42. Economic DevelopmentRecommendations for Expanding Economic Development • Cities should continue business loan and storefront improvement programs, target funds to station areas • Encourage formation of retail association in West Medford Square, extended to cover Boston Avenue • Initiate dialogue with Tufts University Office for Technology Licensing and Industry Collaboration, determine office needs and unmet demand • Invest in streetscape and enhancements to increase overall visual attractiveness of the area 42
  43. 43. Conclusion• Green Line Extension to Mystic Valley Parkway will createnew transportation choices and increase access to jobs andhousing• Vision for the station area has the potential to createadditional housing units, jobs and tax base for both cities andtheir residents• Extension is not without impacts. Vehicle trips will increasewith new development and property taxes in the area arelikely to increase• Strategies and policies can be put in place to mitigateimpacts to the extent possible 43
  44. 44. Thank you! 44
  45. 45. Meeting #4 – Meeting EvaluationMeeting Evaluation 45
  46. 46. Did today’s event improve your understanding of the topics presented?1. Definitely 0%2. Somewhat 0%3. A little 0%4. Not really 0% 10 0 of 200 46
  47. 47. How did today’s event make you feel about the possible extension of the Green Line to MVP?1. Excited 0%2. Optimistic 0%3. So So 0%4. Pessimistic 0% 10 0 of 200 47
  48. 48. How would you rate the overall effectiveness of the meeting?1. Very Effective 0%2. Good 0%3. OK 0%4. Needs Improvement 0%5. Poorly Managed 0% 10 0 of 200 48
  49. 49. Thank you for your participation! Draft Report Will Be Released Soon Followed by a 15-Day Comment PeriodWays to provide comments:• Comment forms from tonight’s meeting• Email: glx@mapc.org• Website: www.mass.gov/greenlineextension OR www.mapc.org• Mail: Metropolitan Area Planning Council, 60 Temple Place, Boston, MA 02111• Phone: 617-451-2770 49

×