Louis charles hamilton ii. vs america et al and state of texas et al.......
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Louis charles hamilton ii. vs america et al and state of texas et al.......

on

  • 2,834 views

Hamilton Vs. United States, Texas, and Harris County

Hamilton Vs. United States, Texas, and Harris County

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,834
Views on SlideShare
2,834
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as OpenOffice

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Louis charles hamilton ii. vs america et al and state of texas et al....... Louis charles hamilton ii. vs america et al and state of texas et al....... Document Transcript

    • In The United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont DivisionLouis Charles Hamilton II(Negro African American) Pro Se Plaintiff Vs.United States of America et al, Defendant Civil No. 1:2011-CV-00122And Vs.State of Texas et al, Co-Defendant(s) Vs.AndHarris County Texas et al, Co-Defendant(s) Complaint and “Jury Demand”
    • Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II,hereby files a Complaint with the above Honorable Court andfor Just Cause” The Pro Se (Louis Charles Hamilton II) Plaintiff will showthe Honorable Court all facts, circumstances and details asbeing entertain in Justice as follows: 1. Parties Pro Se Plaintiff , Louis Charles Hamilton II, AfricanAmerican Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran,Permanently Disable Veteran protected under: (ADA) Americanwith Disability Act; And also minorities persons cover underTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State ofTexas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225 2. The United States of America et al (Defendant) The State of Texas et al (Co-Defendants) Harris County Texas et al (Co-Defendants) 3. Facts
    • The above name male, a descendant from a past legacy offorced “Slavery and Servitude” wrongfully committed againstthe Plaintiff and His family (Negro) descendants primarilybecause of Pro Se Plaintiff being a member of a race that beingof (Negro) origin, (Now considered politically correct within this time frame)a “Black African American male” within the United States ofAmerica Cause(s) now being filed and complained of before theabove entitled Honorable Court; For said Plaintiff “rightful full relief” for all of the ungodlywrongful, extreme and outrageous, conducts committed by alldescribed Defendants collectively herein, Being both the “direct and indirect” causes for all of thedescribed mention factors being that primarily Plaintiffs was aslave with a result in losses in a normal life, as a result Plaintiff continue the loss of peaceful rights in choice,peace, and freedom having already been established for allother first class citizens within the United States of Americaunder the Constitution instituted for all first class citizens.
    • Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court Plaintiff herein(Hamilton II) continue in 2010 an 2011 being Denied living with“Equal Protection of the Laws of the United States of America,and The Law of The State of Texas, and Harris County againstthe Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II Will, Peace, Dignity,Respect, and freedom as other national origins of classes enjoyand continue to enjoy within the United States of America aspresent”, With Defendant(s) “The United States of America et al, CoDefendants The State of Texas et al, and Co-Defendants HarrisCounty et al “systematic criminal (RICO) actions and acts”continual as of this undersign date exercise continual wrongfulconduct of “pattern(s) and practices” in (among other things)the rightful “Equal Protection of the Constitutional of theUnited States Laws on the behalf of the Plaintiff in among otherthing Civil Action in Common Law with the Defendantpossession, custody and control. Against the Plaintiff peaceful “Heritage that of (Negroes) toa rightful official standing place as that of a “first class citizens”within the United States of America, States of Texas and the“Equal Protection thereof And for cause of actions:Injury to Personal Reputation
    • DiscriminationDefamationFraudCivil ConspiraciesImpeaching HonestyInjury to ReputationImputation of Crime, Disease and Sexual MisconductBreach of Contractual AgreementAbuse of Judicial Absolute ImmunityAbuse of Official ImmunityAiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignityand will of the PlaintiffObstruction of JusticeObstruction of Criminal InvestigationConspiracies to pursue the same Criminal ObjectiveViolation of Equal Protection under the Law Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectation damages,foreseeable, future, land, hedonic, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, treble under(RICO), proximate, prospective, special, speculative, substantial, punitive, and permanentdamages Declaration Judgment by a “Jury” that each and every claim, accusation, assertion,contention and charges in all allegations as described fully herein against all Defendants, andtheir agents being entry into the action of this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff Hamilton II(Negro) Black Africa American Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for “serious past, present ,and futureIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being imposed, tariff and levyboth past, current, and future to include but not limited to for all of the Defendants extreme andoutrageous acts as described herein: 1. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition to the above fore-mention damages awards of direct, actual, compensatory, Direct damages paid to the Pro Se Plaintiff for the wrongful loss in direct damages in the ‘amount of Defendant (United
    • States of America et al) $ 48.6 Million Dollars….for the Com- pensation loss of 16.2 Million Dollars Plaintiff herein “suffer & Continue to suffer” at the “Hand of the Defendants (The Unit- ed States of America) in a Federal District Court Civil Action filed in Bob Case Federal Court House in Houston Texas.2. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seek payment from the Defendant (United States of America) made in a Check payable to “Christ Church Cathedral” in the amount of …… $17,343,681.82. for (Charity on the behalf of the Plaintiff)3. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition from the Defendant (the Unit- ed States of America) a Check payable to the direct complete, possession, custody 100% con- trol, of “Director” Christine Vera-Green “only” in Port Arthur Texas 77640 “Hospitality Kitchen for the Poor” “up-grade” on the behalf of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein in the amount of ………$13,177,440.92 for the Plaintiff “Hometown Charity”.4. Co-Defendant (State of Texas et al) $7.2 Million Dollars… The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition to the above fore-mention damages awards of direct, actual, compensatory, Direct damages paid to the Pro Se Plaintiff for Co-Defendant (State of the wrongful loss in direct damages in the ‘amount of Texas et al) $7.2 Million Dollars for the Compensation loss of 2.4 Million Dollars Plaintiff suffer & Continue to suffer at the “Hand of the Defendants (The State of Texas et al , Harris County Court House et al) in a States Court Civil Action filed in Bob Case Federal Court House in Houston Texas5. Co-Defendant (The State of Texas et al) made in a Check payable to “Christ Church Cathedral” in the amount of …$2.800, 000.00 for (Charity on the behalf of the Plaintiff).6. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition from the Defendant (the Unit- ed States of America) a Check payable to the direct complete, possession, custody 100% con- trol, of “Director” Christine Vera-Green “only” in Port Arthur Texas 77640 “Hospitality Kitchen for the Poor ” “up-grade” on the behalf of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein in the amount of ………..$2,856,498.93. For the Plaintiff “Hometown Charity”.
    • Background The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II appearing Pro Se Herein will show the above –Entitled“United States Federal District Honorable Court House” and all of its Justice” facts to wit: that on orabout the 24th day of February 2011 the Plaintiff filed the filing civil cause action H-10-2709 with all of itsfacts and also the Plaintiff Motion in Opposition not to dismiss same cause H-10-2709 all of which willshow the above “United States Eastern District Federal Court” Justice following: In The United States of America District Court For The Southern District of Texas Houston DivisionLouis Charles Hamilton II AMEND COMPLAINT # 2 Plaintiff Vs. Civil Action No: H-10-2709Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al, andMarine Building, L.L.C. et al Defendant(s) AndChrist Church Cathedral et al Co-Defendants Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein files this Second AmendComplaint, Plaintiff will show the Entitled Above Honorable Court “Detail Facts” against all describedDefendants, Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Law Office of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, “Marine Building, L.L.C. et al”,and The Co-Defendants “Christ Church Cathedral” et al all being within Houston Texas, (United States of America)
    • And for cause the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, will show the HonorableCourt as Follows: Parties Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And also minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; DomiciliaryState of Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225 Defendant Harry C. Arthur Esq. A Houston Personal Injury Attorney 1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002 Advertisement states: CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES! Co- Defendant(s) Law offices of Harry C. Arthur 1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002 Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury Attorney) suite 200 Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200 Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200 Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200 Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 Co- Defendant(s)
    • Marine Building, L.L.C. et al 1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002 Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200 (Tenants) 1. AA Quick Bond suite 100 2. Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101 3. Lacey’s Deli 4. Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102 5. Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103 6. Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200 7. The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300 8. The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300 9. Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300 10. Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney) 11. Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300 12. Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300 13. Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300 14. F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300 15. Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300 16. Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300 Co- Defendant(s) Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston is the cathedral church for the Episcopal Diocese of Texas.The congregation was established in 18391117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412
    • Fact(s). To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful materialfacts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration underpenalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit: The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against ChristChurch Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim toshut down (Christ); Which capture “News Headlines” as breaking news story local and nationwide throughtransmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelicttown” “USA” and the Defendant “Harry C. Arthur Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on thingsand toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff and all homeless people at the homeless center base upon them beinga nuisances among other charges made by (Arthur). To include but not limited to defendant(s) collectively sought to among other things impose apermanent injunction against (Christ) to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground itsa "private nuisance”; Claiming among other things in a “Hostile Tort containing defamatory, discriminatory andInvidious Discrimination fashion that the Plaintiff and other(s) similar situated just simply mill about,panhandle, bum cigarettes, urinate, defecate, sleep and make a general nuisance of themselves; See: Harry C. Arthur et al and the Marine Building L.L.C. et al vs. (Christ) Filed in Harris CountyTexas District Court in Houston Texas. In said suit against Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days beforeThanksgiving – The Defendant herein Arthur and The Co-Defendant Marine Building et al seek aminimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate themfor the loss of rentals in the three-story building and its market value. Defendant Arthurs trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersectionfrom The Beacon. The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, a nonprofit established bythe cathedral.
    • The Plaintiff asserts that (Arthur) in Christ church cathedral alleges that the "derelicts" (Christchurch cathedral) assists has become a public nuisance, destroying the value of his business and proper-ty in the process. To include but not limited to Defendant (Arthur) further defaming and applying invidious dis-crimination tact’s against the Plaintiff reputation by accusing the Plaintiff to be a danger to the healthand safety of others in the adjacent areas,” The defendant (Arthur) suit further states. “The (Plaintiff) and other individuals sing play music,dance, and fight and (do) other “undesirable activities” The Defendant (Arthur) says. Further that "If all you do is feed them, you encourage them tostay on the street. And Im afraid that may be kind of a little bit whats happening. They dont have anyincentive to do anything."The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each and every defendant listed and described aboveconspire in concert with their individual legal profession as (Attorney of Law) to organize fraudulentrepresentation of Finances in “material facts” in civil tort filing as described above in that the defendantscollectively willfully wanton and aggressively committed the following: 1. Made a fraudulent bogus submission of material facts in Judicial Court records in Harris County Texas that each defendant separately business operation structure in connection with The Marine Building L.L.C. financial income was effected and in great, risk, loss and jeopardy as described in the complaint of (Arthur); a. Made a further fraudulent bogus submission of material facts of insinuation, sugges- tion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defen- dant as described herein personal financial income and all assets derive their of from said business structure as being describe as: Tangible assets those that have a physical substance and can be touched, such as currencies, buildings, real estate, ve- hicles, inventories, equipment, and precious metals b. To include all live stock, farm animals, domestic animals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock within the United States; c. To include all live stock, farm animals, foreign animals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock; d. To include all Cash and cash equivalents — it is the most liquid asset, which includes currency, deposit accounts, and negotiable instruments (e.g., money orders, cheque, bank drafts). in the United States e. To include all Short-term investments — include securities bought and held for sale in the near future to generate income on short-term price differences (trading secu- rities). f. To include all Receivables — usually reported as net of allowance for uncollectable accounts.
    • g. To include all Inventory — trading these assets is a normal business of a company. The inventory value reported on the balance sheet is usually the historical cost or fair market value, whichever is lower. This is known as the "lower of cost or market" rule. h. To include all prepaid expenses — these are expenses paid in cash and recorded as assets before they are used or consumed (a common example is insurance). See also adjusting entries. i. To include all Fixed asset in the United States j. Also referred to as PPE (property, plant, and equipment), these are purchased for continued and long-term use in earning profit in a business. This group includes as an asset land, buildings, machinery, furniture, tools, and certain wasting resources e.g., timberland and minerals. They are written off against profits over their antici- pated life by charging depreciation expenses (with exception of land assets). Accu- mulated depreciation is shown in the face of the balance sheet or in the notes. k. To include all capital assets in management accounting. l. To include all "Investments". Long-term investments are to be held for many years and are not intended to be disposed of in the near future. This group usually con- sists of four types of investments: Investments in securities such as bonds, common stock, or long-term notes; Investments in fixed assets not used in operations (e.g., land held for sale); Investments in special funds (e.g., sinking funds or pension funds). 2. Was effected and in great risk, loss, and jeopardy as described in the complaint of (Arthur) because of the action of the Plaintiff and other similarly situated ; 3. Defendant (Arthur) then further in judicial court document filing in said malicious civil tort made the further fraudulent bogus submission of material facts of insinuation, suggestion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defendant as de- scribed herein combine business financial income and (assets) & their personal income and (assets) after deductions of, housing or rent, phone bills, electricity, gas, water and sewer, cable, waste removal, maintenance or repairs, transportation, insurance, food, dining out, pets, personal care, medical, entertainment, taxes (Federal and State), saving or investments As described above was not even enough for (Arthur) future financial business survival andsecurity thereof in the Marine Building L.L.C. and base this all on the actions of the Plaintiff being a“Derelict” among other defamatory statements publish in a “Civil Tort” Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant singularly and collectively was fullyaware of his actions (most defendants being Attorneys of law no less) in holding together and collectivelyin such omission of actual material facts and allowing (Arthur) in the presentation of all combinefraudulent financial statement(s) being filed before a Texas Court of law by defendant (Arthur) in ahostile tort fashion of each defendant(s) independent business dealing collectively together.
    • Plaintiff Respectfully state before the Honorable Court that The Marine Building at the timeframe (Arthur) made bogus, fraudulent, false wording before a Harris County Court of Law within theState of Texas in regards to “Lost Revenue and its association with extra rentals”, defendant(s)collectively “new at the very moment they were all combine in providing false material facts when nosuch possible “Rental space revenue loss exist Nor were there any extra spacing for rental at the time frame (Arthur) made complaint against(Christ) nor were there any losses at all in combine said rental property revenue within the “MarineBuilding L.L.C. et al To include but not limited to such other factors that the plaintiff “investigation computation”render true facts that all Co-Defendant(s) Listed above under the “Marine Building L.L.C. et al do in facthaving total possession, total custody and total control of all “possible rental spacing” as stated on thebuilding directory Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Lawoffice of Harry C. Arthur) and the (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) were very delusional, hallucinating,figment of the imagination, and under miss guided myth in the impression and mirage that the Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) were with extra spacing for rentals To Include all Defendants herein Straight out lie in all Court Records, Documents, Proceedingsand News Media events during this “Matter”. Pro Se Plaintiff herein Louis Charles Hamilton II will show a Honorable Court that “all of theDefendant” herein (except Co-Defendant Christ Church et al) While during ongoing “Live” Federal Court Proceeding in 2011 at the “Bob Casey Federal Court inHouston Texas “That” all Defendants herein at Law Office Harry C. Arthur et al, and “Marine Building L.L.C.” “Completely toss in the Trash the following files records, interrogatories, request fordisclosures ,Clients Certified Mail, Client complete briefs, Clients Background facts, Responses to requestfor disclosure phone Messages, clients complete home Liability claim, “Internet research material”, phone numbers &Address, Detective reports, Divorce records, Attorneys listing, clients prices listing, Attorney price listing, “United States Bankruptcy Court Records for the Southern District of TexasHouston Division records”, Insurance Records, Criminal records, Civil Records, Subpoena, Summon,Confidential Medical Records, Fax records, Notices, sign in sheets, listing of client(s) for stated:Spradlin, Riley & Spradlin (Attorney at Law) 24017I-45 North Suite 1 (Woodlands, Texas 77380)Spencer Crain Cubbage Healy & McNamara pllc 1330 Post Oak, Suite 1600 Houston Texas 77056
    • Ms. Kathryn P. Anderson, The Anderson Firm, L.L.C 5629 FM 1960 West, Suite 106 Houston Texas 77069Global 14 Mamaroneck Ave.., 3rd floor White Plains, NY 10601Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital (Houston Texas)Clear Lake Reginal Medical Center ER, Dr. Susanna Perkins (League City), Dr. David Nelson, D.C. (LeagueCity), Dr. John Beerbower, M.D. (Dickinson), Dr. John G. Steele, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Leslie Miller, MOT,OTR (Houston Texas), Dr. Smith Johnston, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Dr. Edward Murphy, M.D. (Houston Texas),(Dr. Govindaraj Ranganathan, M.D. (Friendswood Texas), and Dr. David Durkop, D. C.State farm Insurance Ms. Anise Wu (Austin Texas),Richard Reading and Rhoda Marie ReadingAttorney Ned Gill 6575 West loop south, suite 600, Bellaire Texas 77401(Rhoda Read living @ 1711 McLean Road, Pearland Texas 77584)….Married November 11, 2000Esteban HernandezCalvin BanksJohnny VillatoroNicholas Little (PSI)Ja’mericka HallJorge SantiagoJuan SanchezRichard RamirezDarvin LynnSamuel RobinsonAlvin AlfredEsau VelasquezDamon jaqotJohnathan Simmons
    • Brian GolattCarl NewtonJames HughesPershing PowellLuis GonzagaJohn GoffneyErick CalderonAlex Cantor-MarroquinDeandre MasonJames HuntleyEduardo QuirogaEduardo GarcilazoAmicar VasquesDennis CariasArthur MirelesCraig ScottAnd Julio MatamoroEteban G. AlvearBaltazar, ArroyoAbraham AparicioWillentett T. AugustFrances ArrendondoJocelyn ArnettTimothoy Adair
    • Marilyn AlemanJennifer, BronfieldShen BurlesonZachary T. BostonMaurice S. BradlyXavier J. CainAugustin CarbajalHomero CoronadoMartha CuellarRosalyn CollinsJohn ContrerasMike C. CisnerosGuadalupe K. CortezMaria I CoronaDonovan CrosbyGaribaldi CamposJose A. CantuLa Toya C. CarterPaulo Castanuela Jr.Carl A. CrochetAnthony DoyelAndros A. De La CruzSharon L. DolgeAmy Fleming
    • Brett M. FoisieAlejandro FernandezJesus FrancoRicardo GonzalezRubidia GarciaHector GuevaraIsmael GarzaAdolfo C. GonzalezRuben M. GonzalezSalvador O. GomezYessica Suarez-GalvanRaymon M. GarciaLizette GuerraDavid GonzalezHameedul HassanJennifer HannerLucina M. hernandezDevanand HasmukhRonalald JilesTaft JacksonNathan A. JimenezJohn JoubertMauro JuncoJames G. Jordan
    • Aaron D. JohnsonJose D. KatzDiamond LaddermoreVictor LaraJulio C. LopezDuane E. LawrenceDwayne LigginesJonathan L. LimbrickLuis Gerardo LopezFranciso MartinezJose D. jr. MorenoFarris Mc KendallFrancisco MunozSteven R. NunezJerry L. PiersonAndrew PhillipsCharles Piercefield Jr.Amilcar PerazSantiago PinedaRuben PugaVictor PortilloCesar A. Palacioa-GarzaRobert RoblesJoseph Rumfolo
    • Ari RiascosAngel Sierra-RojasSergio RodriguezDaniel RamirezDarrel W. ReeceDaniel RamirezLoreli Angel Del-RiveraJesus G. ReyesMax RezaBenito F. RodriguezEugenio RomeroRonald E. Rowan Jr.Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi)Armand J. SpenceDaniel E. SeguraMustafa SutarwalaPete SaenzHector E. Gonzalez-SilviaKelton SimmonsJose J. SegredoMichael ScottOliveroes J. TorresLuan Cong TrongMaria E. Umanzor
    • Dillion W. VernonMarkeith WhitingArthur WoodsVictor M. Zamora To include the Plaintiff will show “Honorable Court” evidence with the Plaintiff actual physicalname” Louis Charles Hamilton II” on it… All being criminal, and gross negligent in dumping on the ground behind the Law Office of HarryC. Arthur et al, and The Marine Building L.L.C on 2009 and completed before February 14 2011 All the “Physical Evidence Supporting Plaintiff complete Claims herein this “Federal Civil Action” With Plaintiff herein (Time release photograph exhibits) already filed in the “Federal Courtrecords & Plaintiff herein “Myspace.com account” showing for years 2009 and 2010 showing thecomplete criminal (RICO) activates (among other things) of the “Legal trash” toss on the ground. Which the Plaintiff will show a “Honorable Court” that the Undersign Judge herein acted”Criminal in Conspire actions” with all Defendants in this action involving (Arthur et al) in the bogus boldrefusal to produce any said documents, depositions or evidence in this “Matter and the conspire toscuttle of all evidence which is now in the hands of the Plaintiff Except the “last final missing piece” Plaintiff seeks in this Federal Civil matter the “Deposition”conducted on Houston Texas Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. By “Andy Vickery” Attorney at Law in Houston Texas during the matter with “Christ ChurchCathedral; As described herein Plaintiff exhibit(s) (A) will show an Honorable United States Federal Courtshowing the Following: Exhibit - (A) Invoice dated 1/31/2011from the Marine Building L.L.C 1305 Prairie, Ste. 200Houston, TX 77002 Bill to: Glenn Loethen 3rd floor (February Rent $400.00 & February parking $100.00) Plaintiff will first show the Honorable Court facts detailing surround Plaintiff exhibit (A) is thisthat during the exact day (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (ChristChurch Cathedral) Defendant himself (Arthur) had “just” deposited for the Month of November 2009 rent from(19) tenants all list above @ $400.00 each, Plus $100 each from each tenants for Parking for a Grand Total of = ($9,500).
    • Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court from November 23 2009 to December 1st 2009 some (8)days later after Defendant himself (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against(Christ Church Cathedral) “just” deposited another ($9,500) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et alBanking account Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the year of 2009 up to the day Defendanthimself (Arthur Esq.) was in possession of the Marine Building L.L.C. (Arthur Esq.) deposited other($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the course of this litigation for the year of2010 Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) deposited another ($108,000) Dollars into the Marine BuildingL.L.C et al banking account. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) yearsof (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500) Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court which is actually more income deposited base onLacey’s Deli Commercial sq. ft. at no less than $600-$800 a month rentals (And based on ScroogeAttorney Harry C. Arthur Greed). With tenants Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200, Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite200 and Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 having not been computation into these ($902,500) yearlyfactors and base upon (Arthur Greed)… Making the income of Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C.” deposited far in excess of($932,500) yearly With a (five) years grand total of $4,512,500. Being deposited into Co-Defendants “MarineBuilding L.L.C.” Banking accounts Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants herein The “Ring Investigationset al” took in income in (one) month, funds in excess of $9013.53 gross. With deduction for rent and parking of $500.00 leaving Ring Investigation net pay for one monthin excess of $8513.53 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur etal” took income in (one) month time funds in excess of: During the month of November 2009 when (Arthur et al) file suit against (Christ et al)$166,500.00 per month = $330,001.00 for (2) months in the Month of November 2009 and the month ofDecember 2009 When (Arthur et al) launch Hostile Takeover actions against (Christ Church Cathedral Plaintiff will show a “Honorable United States Federal Court” that in the last (5) past years
    • Defendant himself Law Firm & (Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a Total of $1,998,000.00 (One MillionNine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) yearsof (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500) And for The last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm of Harry C. Arthur & (Arthur Esq.)accumulated per year a net Total of $1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety EightThousand Dollars. With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000combine the two Grand Total for (5) years of the Marine Building L.L.C. and Law Offices of harry C. Arthuret al….. “Drum roll”……..Plaintiff will show an “Honorable Court Grand Total of $11,988,000.00 (ElevenMillion Nine Hundred and Eighty DollarsThis figure was base upon (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) Clients listing filed above and for thefollowing Clients:Eteban G. AlvearBaltazar, ArroyoAbraham AparicioWillentett T. AugustFrances ArrendondoJocelyn ArnettTimothoy AdairMarilyn AlemanJennifer, BronfieldShen BurlesonZachary T. BostonMaurice S. BradlyXavier J. Cain
    • Augustin CarbajalHomero CoronadoMartha CuellarRosalyn CollinsJohn ContrerasMike C. CisnerosGuadalupe K. CortezMaria I CoronaDonovan CrosbyGaribaldi CamposJose A. CantuLa Toya C. CarterPaulo Castanuela Jr.Carl A. CrochetAnthony DoyelAndros A. De La CruzSharon L. DolgeAmy FlemingBrett M. FoisieAlejandro FernandezJesus Franco (ha, ha)Ricardo GonzalezRubidia GarciaHector Guevara
    • Ismael GarzaAdolfo C. GonzalezRuben M. GonzalezSalvador O. GomezYessica Suarez-GalvanRaymon M. GarciaLizette GuerraDavid GonzalezHameedul HassanJennifer HannerLucina M. hernandezDevanand HasmukhRonalald JilesTaft JacksonNathan A. JimenezJohn JoubertMauro JuncoJames G. JordanAaron D. JohnsonJose D. KatzDiamond LaddermoreVictor LaraJulio C. LopezDuane E. Lawrence
    • Dwayne LigginesJonathan L. LimbrickLuis Gerardo LopezFranciso MartinezJose D. jr. MorenoFarris Mc KendallFrancisco MunozSteven R. NunezJerry L. PiersonAndrew PhillipsCharles Piercefield Jr.Amilcar PerazSantiago PinedaRuben PugaVictor PortilloCesar A. Palacioa-GarzaRobert RoblesJoseph RumfoloAri RiascosAngel Sierra-RojasSergio RodriguezDaniel RamirezDarrel W. ReeceDaniel Ramirez
    • Loreli Angel Del-RiveraJesus G. ReyesMax RezaBenito F. RodriguezEugenio RomeroRonald E. Rowan Jr.Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi)Armand J. SpenceDaniel E. SeguraMustafa SutarwalaPete SaenzHector E. Gonzalez-SilviaKelton SimmonsJose J. SegredoMichael ScottOliveroes J. TorresLuan Cong TrongMaria E. UmanzorDillion W. VernonMarkeith WhitingArthur WoodsVictor M. Zamora @ Attorneys fees of $1500.00 per client….. (However the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” Gross 5 year period projection is in excess of
    • $18,000,000.00 (Eighteen Million Dollars) which is even maybe slight higher than this simply base uponHouston Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. (Greed). Plaintiff further Assert this $18,000,000.00 combine with all of the other Defendants @ MarineBuilding L.L.C. listed as: Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200 Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200 Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200 Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 (Tenants) 17. AA Quick Bond suite 100 18. Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101 19. Lacey’s Deli 20. Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102 21. Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103 22. Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200 23. The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300 24. The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300 25. Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300 26. Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney) 27. Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300 28. Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300 29. Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300 30. F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300 31. Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
    • 32. Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300 For a Combine well funded (RICO) Syndicate in easy excess of $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty TwoMillion Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest”….(Attempt) To take on “Christ Church Cathedral et al” in a Hostile takeover” (Which Arthur et al Did in allfacts and circumstances Attempt) Plaintiff further assert his personal expert extreme knowledge that they (Arthur et al) was goingto certainly need $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty Two Million Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest Money”…. With “Two Extra Big Titanium Steel Balls” Taking on (Christ et al)…… Base upon: (1). “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston” is the “Cathedral Church for the Episcopal Dioceseof the “Whole State of Flipping Texas……Da’ (2.) And the “Houston Cathedral” and The entire congregation was established in 1839 (That Arthur et al and your “Hostile 32 Million Dollars Take Over”) Vs. Very, Very Old Money inHouston Cathedral with interest incurred since… 1839 Added in with The Entire United States of America Federal Government funding for the“Homeless” in the “Top of Millions” of Tax Dollars per year C/o “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston”. If ya So (Slooooooooow), “Big rock take little Rock” The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all defendant(s) singularly and or collectively werecommitted to making extreme calculations and execution(s) of false prejudice or stereotypingstatements of the reputation of the Plaintiff as described in the “Tort” filed against (Christ) of beingsubstandard which defendant carry out this scheme for profit through the Wide spread media Newsagencies both local and National” at the expense of Plaintiff to be of a“ Nasty horrid revolting reputation” in connection with defendant(s) collective “Financial scheme/crime of things for profit” And conspiracy in connection thereof, for unauthorized access of a protected media computer,public records and court records & court: txed And all protected records thereof, in which all defendant(s) herein collectively did access saidmail and wire computer device(s) to provide and promote tremendous amounts of “Negative”fraudulent personal and business information which were “indeed” attempt to be used in a fraudulentadvantage way to fraud for wrongful future gains of monies and to scam in the devalue of real estateproperty of the Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) and surrounding area’s
    • To include but not limited to all defendants commitment to a further conjure to work collectivefor defendant (Arthur) scheme of things in among other things in obstruction of justice in connection tocollection(s) thereof of all ill-gotten gains And placing a long “term of loss value on (Christ) property in the Houston Down town area Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to all defendants financial business survival,endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during aLegal Judicial proceeding, and in public records Fraudulent omission in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards tothe Defendants business financial dire situation to fraud the “Interest of (“Christ”) against the rights ofthe Plaintiff. The Plaintiff will show the “Honorable Court Defendant(s) collective scheme of things could notfor any reasoning exclude the Plaintiff from this group (Beacon Clients) because it would becounterproductive to the “Master Plan” if casting the Plaintiff as the only decent, clean, dirt free,cleanse, spotless, sophisticated, skilled, learn, knowledgeable, educated, and privileged person amongthe group and opposite from the group and the defendant(s) collective scheme has no chance ever ofsurvival. The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) collective scheme of things in theusage of “Invidious Discrimination tactic & Defamatory tactic” against dignity because the Plaintiff is apart of group associated with (Beacon Clients) also was express by the sarcasm, mockery, cynicism,travesty of exaggeration(s) of the Plaintiff to be without cause to exist and Plaintiff only existence onearth in the Houston Texas area is for free food @ the (Beacon) only” To include but not limited to facts surrounding the defendant(s) collectively wrongful use ofliable/slander against (HPD) Houston Police Department to their advantage by ways of making falseclaims of no security being properly provided in the area of the (Beacon) or lack thereof as stated in thecomplaint of the defendant(s) which is so untrue and supported by Police reports in the city of HoustonTexas during the time frame (Arthur) made complaints against (Christ). In which the Defendant(s) collectively further sought safely to carry out their Organization wellpremeditated plans to degrade the downtown area “Property Value” around (“Christ”) with its claims ofthe Plaintiff being “Total Human Trash “ While defendant(s) herein collectively plan a systematic using/planning hostile by further futuremeans to obtain the Property of (Christ) with the unwitting “Media” usage for wide spread mediacoverage in connection with a financial scheme & fraudulent crime of things With the “Media” also as the main driving device to carry out for the defendant(s) “devilyclever” collective “sham and scheme” of things to create a property lost for the benefit of the Marine
    • building L.L.C. with the Plaintiff being unwittingly at the “Hands of all defendant(s) herein being thesource of all “depreciation and degrading factors” against (Christ) property and the local area propertyfor a profit scam. The defendants (Arthur et al) herein collective scheme of things to attempt also to devalue theproperty of (“Christ”) and the real estate for the benefit of Co-Defendant in this action Marine BuildingL.L.C in the downtown Houston, Texas area To include but not limited to the Free promotionalAdvertisement for Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) being the Reputed Ruthless Law Firm And all of the ill-gotten revenue derive their from the “New Reputed Ruthless Law FirmReputation” with Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) furtherscheme and sham of things being wrongfully promotion with the free planned usage of theunsuspecting, unwitting, unconscious, efforts of all media agencies both “local and national” with the“Internet” included at the expensive of the Plaintiff and other instantaneously similar the same. All was indeed done unjust, and most certainly unwanted against the Plaintiff “rights anddignity”, to include this scheme of things was further to fraudulent cheat (Christ) out of monetaryfederal/private/donation funds in excess of ($250,000) base all wrongfully upon the Plaintiff being“Street Nasty Trash” In the area around The Marine Building L.L.C. for a future profit scheme of the Defendant(s)collective shame to include alternatively Plaintiff is able to show the defendant(s) having furtherpremeditated plans after the impose permanent injunction against the (Beacon) defendant(s) sought tofurther obtain (Christ) property for them self or together with some other real estate conglomerate forfurther scam for profit(s). Plaintiff further assert In the process of (Arthur et al ) doing “all of the above nasty” defendant(Arthur et al) then went further and “stole” the Plaintiff “Christmas Holiday season of 2009” While attempting on giving the “Christ et al” “a black eye” before Thanksgiving day of 2009 inthe “National media” in the process with all of the criminal (RICO) display that Defendant (Arthur et al )having now balls after making all of this unwanted, wrongfulAnd unjust fuss having the nerves of filing a dismissal of his civil suit as if nothing “ever”, “ever”, “even”“Happen” further causing the Plaintiff emotional distress and mental anguish in being involved with(Arthur et al ) in any form” both past, present and future. Plaintiff Assert that Defendant, (Arthur Esq.), Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur etal) and Co-Defendant (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) Individually and collectively as described herein above committed all acts and actions asdescribed fully herein in Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO)Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization practices against the legal rights of the Plaintiff inconnection with Fraud as described here in the (2) Amend Complaint.
    • The Plaintiff will show the United States District Court Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaintmade against (Christ et al) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so call property damages,loss rentals, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiff alleged acts, Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard their own “actual property value” by theDefendants on mismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps by way of the followingexhibit(s) already on the United States Federal District Court files: a. The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009 b. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial property and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-2) photo in 2009 c. The continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-3), photo in 2009 d. The continual mismanagements in nasty restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for lots of rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-4) photo in 2009 e. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009 f. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial property and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit the new 2010 series of pictures….  g. The pictures showing continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up dated h. The continual mismanagements in restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for ro- dents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up date i. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above with 2010 photograph up detail up date. j. With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of all wrongful involvements as described bythe Defendant(s) own wording in the complaint against (Christ et al) And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of the collectively hostile, extreme and
    • outrageous acts and actions of the Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint, AmendComplaint, all motions and exhibits currently before the Honorable Court. With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at the Harris County in support of the Defendantcausing Plaintiff intentional emotional harm, complete severe mental anguish Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in their cruel presentations made against (Christet al) with claims of a profound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Public interest, health,and safety as described in (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al) In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought to impose a “less value of worth” towardsthe public impression of the Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate, ridicule of ascheme for monetary fund’s against (Christ et al) thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhilethe scum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and Are too stupid to understand the Defendants herein collectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire”Fraud Scheme of things for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak and unprotected cause he is streettrash. Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendants to this action one (Arthur et al)“boldly and foolishly” is now desecrating such the “Honorable Work Product” of the two Professionallegal Attorneys”. By way of Defendant (Arthur et al) claiming/theft the entire work product of anotherAttorney(s) work product. Namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys” listed above who’slegal wording design in the deposition with the Plaintiff (Hamilton) own work product of legaldocuments being also provided to (Andy Vickery Attorney at Law & Kenny IV Esq.) before hand of saidDeposition of (Arthur Esq.) The work product of namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys”against (Arthur et al) in the past in all fact and circumstances defeated (Arthur Esq. and Law Office ofHarry C. Arthur et al and The Marine Building L.L.C. et al” and not some (Bogus) materials that mayhaving been prepared by (Arthur et al) “himself” with an eye towards the realistic possibilities indefense of this particular impending litigation against The Plaintiff (Hamilton II) And or materials that (Arthur Esq.) prepared in defense of himself in his on directexamination...? In the previous civil action against the “Holy Church”. Defendant (Arthur et al) seems to think now collectively combining his other wrongful acts andactions precisely committed and directed against the Plaintiff rights and dignity in the past that anyfuture defamatory acts and further fraudulent practices by said defendant (Arthur et al) in the nowstated claims of the work product of another Attorney(s) deposition…
    • Is the same/equivalent as if claiming the Plaintiff to be a total “water/egg head bumpkin” fromJefferson County, Texas whom happen to fallen of a Long Horn Cattle truck in a pasture field upon apetrified pieces of cow crap …thus providing the Plaintiff already being further in a state …from allleaves of his own common sense and fully rendering this Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as a previously mentioned total “water/egg headbumpkin” ignorant of all of the Civil Court laws of the United States “that even a 5th grader can figureout” in regards to the “work product” and or “Attorney/client doctrine” defendants (Arthur et al) nowseeks foolish refuge under. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur et al) even refuse to file thesuit against the correct Defendants’ and avoid the Plaintiff from suffering being humiliated in public withexcitement of ridicule from others which (Arthur) cause to include causing the Plaintiff further innerhumiliation In which he (Arthur) should have filed his suit against the “City of Houston et al” for notproviding needed restrooms for the homeless population like other metropolitan cities “In fact do” with a large homeless population equal to the City of Houston TX similar homelesspopulation and or smaller cities population “yet” homeless people are having adequate restroom accessother then here within “Houston” Texas which defendant (Arthur) did not pursue this avenue; Instead (Arthur) attack the Beacon clients “Only” as if all of the clients are guilty of the humancrap and urine on his building and especially slow in the brain department in being afraid to pursuerightful legal actions against a (Attorney) no less for his wrong actions; Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendant (Arthur et al) further refuse to“add all other” outreach centers located throughout the Houston (CBD) central business district asjoining Plaintiff in his action against the Christ Church Cathedral, and the Beacon… Defendant (Arthur etal) went after “Christ Church Cathedral” And the Beacon (Only) with his suit while his scheme of things include defaming the Plaintiff inthe process while (Arthur) attempt to achieve monetary fund’s based on defaming and discriminatingagainst the Plaintiff rights and dignity; Instead of (Arthur et al) implying some of the client(s) of the beacon being Derelict(s) withimplication in the definition of derelict that charges the Plaintiff with the further commission of a crimeof crapping, pissing and vomiting on the property of the Defendant; (Arthur et al) “Unflinchingly, courageously, and with an Audaciously bold potty mouth” withstrong references to “defecation, crap, feces matter and Urine discharge “as loath some” as one can getwith this kind of human product waste being criminally involved And or as in the “Hood” or any other place with among my (African American) people wouldrefer to as “S.H.I.T.” and “Piss” and or one “nasty” “Trifling mother fu_ker” to be doing this kind of acts
    • in a public place. (Arthur et al) have the Plaintiff being involved in these allegations of human nasty waste beingwrongfully discharge and its involvement with the Plaintiff (among other statements) that refer to thePlaintiff further being associated with being a nuisances in Houston, Texas being made public not justlocal but “Nationwide” to include but not limited to the “World” via the “Internet” (Arthur et al) then wanted to shut down the Plaintiff “feedhole” namely “The Beacon” “Only”with strong emphases on “forever” And terminated any further charity outreach at this beacon facility “Only” in the (CBD) while(Arthur et al) further attempt to steal $250,000.00 dollars of the Plaintiff “Poor man money” The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that all of the Defendant(s) collectively herein whilehaving several “legal degrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot” and “Marine BuildingL.L.C., Quite failing “on purpose” once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simple honest legalAttorney form in a Motion to dismiss this action (Stating the Plaintiff has no legal standing in Texas)”. “With the full knowledge “Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjoin the illegalexpenditure of public funds”, and “need not demonstrate a particularized injury”.  Which thedefendant(s) wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff current legal standing before thecourt: See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972);  Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944).   Implicit in this rule are two requirements:  (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that publicfunds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity.   See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556;  Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at908;  Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200. Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continue committing to further “pattern andpractices” of “Illegal Misrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of Attorneys of Law. (An Attorney whom representing himself has a fool for a client surly applies here) The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that in the Defendants motion to dismiss on therecords of this action quoted:Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) “Which do not even in all fact and circumstances apply inthis matter: “Taxpayers in Texas legally have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds, and“need not” demonstrate a particularized injury” as stated by the Law Books. “Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed Force Services” namely the “United States
    • Navy Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a “gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran”returning to a “normal start” in life within Houston Texas” With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide” in association with the United StatesFederal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf indire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to the said “Armed Force Services” namely the Navy for argumentsake “if being a possible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of “Disable American Veteran” To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of a gift of appreciation on the Plaintiffbehalf and a direct legal needed aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a “Disability”moreover, Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift of appreciation for a (DAV) DisableAmerican Veteran being provided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “Nation Wide”, In association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legaloperation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes to maintain inthe delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the “cause of actions” being brought in said suit against(Christ et al) or any damaged being caused by any actions of the defendants as a result of their law suit. And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegations made against collectively against all ofthe Defendants in his complaint. Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the Honorable Court and address the non-fictional factsthat the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ Church Cathedral” for: (1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein “genitals” being in violations of somesorts or sodomizing acts being past or present occurred and committed against any of the Defendantsrights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al) (2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civil refugee in a suit against (Christ) withconcrete claims in a nature that a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the “Cathedralhigh castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall upon any of their collectively heads; Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court that These Greedy Nasty Defendant(s)collectively herein (Arthur et al) made real criminal intent in a “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of thingsamong other (RICO) and State Civil Charges against the Plaintiff rights, peace, dignity all for profit andbogus claims filed further on the “Harris County Court Wire system in Houston Texas” which is then“broadcast” “Nationwide” no less” That the Plaintiff being a client of the beacon Is now factual a “nasty dog of a person who cannothold his “crap from his rectum or urine” therefore likes pissing all over the Defendant (Arthur Esq.)
    • property @ Marine Building L.L.C. and all over the city of Houston Texas, To include Plaintiff (Hamilton II) is a real panhandler derelict of sorts with “not a simple singlepurpose in life of any sorts” “But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets” Among other crude statements being made in said complaint against (Christ et al) And the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) herein collectively is entitled to a special grand “Hefty”$250,000.00 Dollars. From the Co-Defendants (Christ et al) To include but not limited to the Federal Government legal support of the (Beacon) for thePlaintiff behalf is “Hereby fully and forever close to boot” in this “Obstruction of Justice” of a legalFederal Funded Operation With all of the Defendants “Claims” (“among other things”); Lost some rentals funds and Defendants (Arthur Esq.) “Main property value” (Marine BuildingL.L.C. Is now in the “Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is based upon the Pro Plaintiff herein (HamiltonII) is super nasty and very lose on the City of Houston Texas. Therefore the City of Houston is now official “Derelict Town USA” base upon the Plaintiff asdescribed by (Arthur et al). And Plaintiff wishes to remind the United States Federal Court all of this is based upon theactions of the Defendants et al in a hostile civil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetarycompensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of $250,000.00 with full time forever closureof the (Beacon et al) But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiff damage in any form….? Plaintiff (2) Amend Complaint states a long list of “Legal Federal cause of actions with newupdate exhibits attached herein of Legal Exhibits from the Defendant(s) in the possession of the Plaintiffas described herein Fully Furthering “The United States of America Federal Court” requiring the Defendant(s)collectively herein (Arthur et al and (Christ et al) to be held fully “responsible and most accountable”before a “United States Federal Court” for all of these criminal and civil acts And actions described against the Plaintiff peaceful rights, will, and dignity as described herein, Plaintiff further assert Defendant (Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants (“Christ et al”) collectivelyhaving cause enough “emotional trauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII As described herein and rightfully so, causing undue disrespectful behavior of the same criminal
    • RICO “Mail and Wire” nature to others similarly the same, With “Extreme gross negligent” by Co-Defendant herein “Christ et al” in Defense of the Plaintiff“Race”, “Veteran status” “Religion”, “Peace”, “Will” and “Dignity” at all times by (Beacon et al) there afterPlaintiff provide (Christ et al) “legal civil team” evidences, facts, legal support, in their civil countersuitagainst (Arthur et al). With details facts of Plaintiff intended legal pursuit of (Arthur et al) in all documents, faxtransmissions, letters and records, and Plaintiff Pro Se Civil Counter Civil action against (Arthur et al). Notwithstanding all “current exhibits” with detail real facts of all photograph evidence filed inthe “Honorable Court and the Plaintiff Myspace.com photos on the “Internet” thus far being submittedin the records , depicted and showing Defendant(s) (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al), And (“Marine Building L.L.C.) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailer trash disgusting nature inbeing all supposedly Professional Attorneys and Business operating out of “Co-Defendant “MarineBuilding L.L.C..” with such Nasty, poor un-kept, run down property waste conditions’, creepy drunkcommercial painting, useless fire escape safety hazard , And “Ton’s, upon, Ton’s, of Client’s “Civil & Criminal Legal” Trash being physically dump on theground for exposure to ridicule, scorn, mock, tease, jeer at, make fun of, derision, deride, andcomplete poke fun at. By the General Public of Clients (Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) Since Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) recorded during 2009- 2010 and now file exhibit(s) in 2011against the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al”, & “Marine Building L.L.C”, and Harry C. Arthur Esq. Plaintiff moves for Each Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) each and their “perspectiveAttorneys” filing a response with the clerk in regards to all of the Following (2) Amend Complaint” andfor the reasons as stated in above regards to the all of Defendants Collectively actions as Amend Hereinthe (2) Amend Complaints. Cause of action 1. The Pro Se Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated cause of actions in the“Original complaint” and The First Amend complaint; as fully enforced and stated herein for: Wrongful acts and actions collectively conspire to willfully, with full disregards or consequencesof their acts/actions committed all in Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences CorruptionOrganization,Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud
    • and related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal(RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments),Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts andactions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO).Multiple Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: (a) Mail and Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). (b) Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, digni- ty and will of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated fact in the Original, first amend complaintand (2) Amend Complaint for full Declaratory Judgment Being made entered into the records of this action that each and every claim, accusation,assertion, contention And charges in this (2) Amend Complaint as described fully herein against all Defendants, andtheir agents being entry into the action of this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff Against each of the Defendants, (Arthur Esq.) And Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al), And Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) and Co-Defendants (Christ et al). Individually and collectively as described herein said complaint being committed all acts andactions, to include “Obstruction of Justice”, False exhibit of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the sameCriminal Objective, Co-Defendant (Christ et al) Violation of the Plaintiff Equal Protection under the Law. Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort ,Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease andor Sexual Misconduct, Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander ofthe Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”;
    • And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities Plaintiff seeks Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectationdamages, foreseeable, Future, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, proximate, prospective, special, speculative,substantial, Punitive, Defamation, Discrimination and Permanent damages; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being entry into the recordsagainst all Defendants herein to Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for “Serious past, present ,and future Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and MentalAnguish being imposed, tariff and levy both past, current, and future; Defendants (Arthur et al), Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants (“Marine Building L.L.C. et al) in the Amount already having been established in the AmendComplaint in excess of $16.2 Million Dollars from a Jury. To include but not limited to: Exemplary treble damages under (RICO) statue being awarded tothe Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as described in the $16.2 Million Dollars Judgment by a Jury. With 10% being deducted from each and every Defendant herein Namely (Arthur et al), (LawOffice of Harry C. Arthur et al) And (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) from all said judgments awards and compensations by aJury in this action And made payable to Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization“Namely” “Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a“Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 itsaddress is1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412 And entry into the records against Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral) in the Amount of $2.4Million Dollars. With full interest incurred since date of injury of November 23 of 2009
    • Plaintiff further seek Co-Defendant herein (Christ Church Cathedral et al) make Check payable forAwards/compensation in the amount of: $2,391,350.33 To the Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization “Namely”….Drumroll…………. “Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a“Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 itsaddress is1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412 All Defendants’ each herein be made to pay all Court cost, and Any Attorneys Cost. Plaintiff (Hamilton) seek the Honorable United States District Court Courtesies in Disciplinaryreferral of Attorney(s) at Law (Arthur et al) to the Texas Lawyer Bar Associated governing AttorneyDisciplinary activities for each Attorney Defendant herein For full legal “Disbarment proceeding commence (ASAP) against” (Arthur et al Attorney atLaw(s))(Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al and (Marine Building L.L.C. Attorneys at law(s) for his entire hostile,extreme, extra special outrageous Illegal criminal (RICO) conducts, and Fraudulent actions as described herein throughout the (2)Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II And for all “Deem just and being Honorable before this United States Federal Court during alawful proceeding on the behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II. “Conclusion”Dedications to “Cmdr. Bluefin “Sherlock Holmes Mystery Case of”: “The Talking Treasure Box”its Cast:
    • “Buck and The Preacher man”, “Rick and A.J. Simon”, of “Simon & Simon” “Detective Agency”, “Ben Matlock”, “Danny Ocean”, “Monk”, And a very sneaky (Thomas Magnum) the little voice in my head….xoxox!Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2011 Submitted Respectfully By: ____________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P.O. Box 20126 Houston Texas, 77225 United States District Court Southern District of Texas Houston DivisionLouis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff Motion in
    • Pro Se Plaintiff Opposition to Dismiss,with “Support Brief and Exhibit(s)” Vs. Civil action No.H-10-2709Harry C. Arthur (Esq.) DefendantLaw office of Harry C. Arthur et al Co- Defendant(s)Marine Building, L.L.C. et al Co-Defendant(s) Comes now the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II;files his motion, with attached brief and exhibit(s) in support ofPlaintiff Motion in Opposition to “not-dismissing “numbercause H-10-2709 in the Civil Matter of Louis Charles Hamilton IIvs. Harry C. Arthur et al, now being entertain before theHonorable Court; And for cause the Plaintiff will show the following: 1. Defendant(s) collectively moves for a “joint dismissal” from this action applying their weird senile reasoning on several factors which the Plaintiff shall address each;
    • First defendant(s) collectively, Arguments and Authority issue “because of lack of standing “is incorrect Brief I. The Defendant(s) collectively while having several “legaldegrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot”,Quite failing once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simplehonest legal Attorney form”. “Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjointhe illegal expenditure of public funds”, and “need notdemonstrate a particularized injury”.  Which the defendant(s)wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff currentlegal standing before the court: See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972);  Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177 S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944).   Implicit in this rule are two requirements:  (1) that theplaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended onthe allegedly illegal activity.   See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556;  Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at 908;  Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200. Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continuecommitting to further “pattern and practices” of “IllegalMisrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of
    • Attorneys of Law. (An Attorney whom representing him self has a fool for aclient surly applies here) The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that:Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) do not even applyin this matter: “Taxpayers in Texas have standing to enjoin the illegalexpenditure of public funds, and “need not” demonstrate aparticularized injury”. “Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed ForceServices” namely the “United States Navy” *See Attachmentexhibit (A); (Plaintiff Veteran ID) Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a“gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran” returning to a “normalstart” in life within Houston Texas” With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide”in association with the United States Federal Governmentproviding a funding to a legal operation to provide not just forthe Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to the said “Armed ForceServices” namely the Navy for argument sake “if being apossible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of
    • “Disable American Veteran” To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of agift of appreciation on the Plaintiff behalf and a direct legalneeded aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a“Disability” moreover, Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift ofappreciation for a (DAV) Disable American Veteran beingprovided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “NationWide”, To include but not limited to the services being providedby the (Beacon) namely Christ Church Cathedral is an act of“Devine Holiness” by its Congregation, Founders, Providers, andinspire by the teaching of Jesus Christ in association with “God”for over 170 years at the present location for not only the needof the Plaintiff but also God’s Children *See Plaintiff attached exhibit (B)…… (Beacon et al). The Plaintiff is a “past and currently present” Client of theBeacon in association with “Christ Church Cathedral” especiallyat the time frame of all of the acts, actions, and incidentsagainst the Plaintiff rights will, and dignity made for the basicsof this action as described by the Plaintiff in the AmendComplaint. *See Attachment exhibit (C); (Plaintiff Client letter in
    • association with the Beacon) Plaintiff further state Defendant(s) collectively fail toprovide before the Honorable Court to the effect “Proof of anywritten agreements being made between (Arthur et al) and themystery Confederates in agreement with the (Beacon et al) thatthe reasoning the “Non-suit filing” was made to support (Arthuret al) false pretense in now the need to cover up the“Defendants collectively criminal mail and wire fraud scheme ofthings and all other expose “legal Interest” now being describedby the Plaintiff; Plaintiff clearly stated all post cover up “acts and actions”involving alleged “working together” is a front for theDefendant(s) collective “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of thingstheir after the exposure of (Arthur et al) bogus intents Through the Professional deposition being conductedagainst (Arthur et al) in among other things his discrepancies innumerous false finances statements made during his hostileactions against (Christ) in a complaint and filed before a HarrisCounty court of law; Such collective “bogus illegal and quite fraudulent intent ofthe Defendant(s) being brought to light first and foremost bythe “exclusive experience work product” and direct examinationdeposition of (Andy Vickery) and (Kinney IV) Respectful honestAttorneys for (Christ et al) to defeat (Arthur et al) “under oath”.
    • *See Plaintiff exhibits attached to Plaintiff Motion for a(TRO) in regards to Arthur et al reply to Plaintiff motions forproduction of the deposition as (Arthur et al) supplyinformation in regards to protecting property financinginformation’s contain in among other things in the depositionconducted “against” (Arthur et al) by (Christ) et al ProfessionalHonest Attorneys of record Andy Vickery and Kinney IV Now which Defendants herein collectively attempt thissame rouge ploy in said discovery request to with hold from thePlaintiff during civil actions in Harris County Court files. Plaintiff further respectfully asserts (Vickery) madestatements to the effect a deposition of (Arthur) being underoath should clear up his judgment in public news media reports. II The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes tomaintain in the delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the“cause of actions” being brought in said suit against (Christ etal) or any damaged being caused by any actions of thedefendants as a result of their law suit. And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegationsmade against collectively against all of the Defendants in hiscomplaint.
    • Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the HonorableCourt and address the non-fictional facts that the Defendant(s)(Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ ChurchCathedral” for: (1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein“genitals” being in violations of some sorts or sodomizing actsbeing past or present occurred and committed against any ofthe Defendants rights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al) (2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civilrefugee in a suit against (Christ) with concrete claims in a naturethat a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the“Cathedral high castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall uponany of their collectively heads; Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court thatThese Greedy Nasty Defendant(s) collectively herein made realcriminal intent in a “Mail and Wire fraud scheme of things forprofit and all bogus claims filed further on the “HonorableHarris County Court Wire” which is then “broadcast”“Nationwide” no less” that the Plaintiff being a client of thebeacon *See exhibit (B) Plaintiff letter being a client”  Is in now fact a “nasty dog of a person who cannot hold hiscrap from his rectum or urine therefore and likes pissing all overthe Defendant property Marine Building L.L.C. and all over thecity of Houston Texas,
    • To include Plaintiff is a real panhandler derelict of sortswith “not a simple single purpose in life of any sorts” “But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets” Among other crude statements being made in saidcomplaint against (Christ et al) And the Defendant(s) herein collectively is entitled to aspecial grand “Hefty” $250,000.00 Dollars and the “Holy soupkitchen with all of its super support local. To include but not limited to the Federal Government legalsupport of the (Beacon) for the Plaintiff behalf is “Hereby fullyand forever close to boot” cause the Defendants lost somerentals and defendants “main property value” is now in the“Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is Plaintiff is nasty and loseon the City of Houston Texas. There for the City of Houston nowis official “Derelict Town USA”. And Plaintiff wishes to remind the Honorable Court all ofthis is base upon the actions of the Defendants et al in a hostilecivil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetarycompensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of$250,000.00 But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiffdamage in any form….?
    • First the Plaintiff Respectfully assert to the HonorableCourt..! (I really like to slid Arthur Esq. stupid face smoothacross the court room ninja style”, until it hit the Jury Box thenbounce off and fall asleep on the floor needing a deluxepackage ride to the local E.R. and you can have my “HonestOath” on that one) And then I will respectfully state before the HonorableCourt: 1. Defendant(s) collectively having placing them self on “Legal Death Row” by involving the Plaintiff in this nasty, disgusting, filthy, highly rude, acts for monies in a Federal criminal “mail and wire fraud scheme. (I am not stupid) 2. Notwithstanding total disgrace the Plaintiff before the eyes of god seeking hostile actions against a Holy Church in vain of and against the Plaintiff name, dignity, and will 3. And in doing this, said collective Defendant(s) herein further sought to attempting in stealing from a “Holy Church” $250,000.00 Dollars, with a permanent enforce closure on the “legal homeless soup kitchen operations” and take the Plaintiff name in vain no less among others with this actions also,
    • 4. Not with standing facts that the Plaintiff being a person whom already is in the need of no more “current legal problems in his name before a “Honorable Court” 5. And all these Defendants collectively wondering why..? The organizer /leader “Commander in Chief “Harry C. Arthur Esq.” in this collective “Mail and Wire Fraud scheme of thing complaint made against the Plaintiff rights, will and dignity being that (Arthur Esq.) personal face is not crumble, bleeding, and good –n- broken up..? I will tell you why for the following special reasons: 6. The Law that’s why… 7. My Doctor is the next reasoning whom having to supply Plaintiff medications in regards to this disrespectful dis- play for greed 8. *See Plaintiff Original Complaint with Original Medical Records on file at the Harris County Court House in Houston Texas in the Matter of: Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Harry C. Arthur The Marine Building, L.L.C. et al 2009-80663 Plaintiff will respectfully strongly assert before theHonorable Court that the VAMC Mental Doctor is quit cable intelling the Honorable Court to his/her face information inregards to Plaintiff medical records and (Arthur et al)
    • disposition standing with the Pro Se Plaintiff” at the past andcurrent time frame. Plaintiff further refer the Honorable court *See Plaintiffexhibits attached in Plaintiff motion to secure commercialbusiness records among other things that facts showing (Arthuret al) each and every reply of Defendants collectively hereinconjure wrongfully against Plaintiff rights for said Deposition.To include Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) stating Plaintiff has directemotional Issues in their reply to hide the discovery deposition. The Plaintiff can show the Honorable Court that there isJustice the Plaintiff move to Houston Texas which the Plaintiffsupply the Defendant(s) all theses factories and Plaintiffreasoning for sought refugee in Christ Church Cathedral namelythe (Beacon) while Plaintiff render legal services to severalDefendants in order to escape from harm and pursue civilactions As described in Plaintiff exhibit (D) *Clerk’s Entry ofDefault. On a Murder for Hire Scheme to Kill the Plaintiff namelyLouis Charles Hamilton II in this Action also With attached copy of said Civil Complaint No. 1:10-CV-55*Plaintiff exhibit (E) in which those crooked Defendants thereinhaving any further criminal intent to even dream of entertaining
    • any guest appearance before the Honorable United StatesDistrict Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division(Honorable Hang Judge) for all of the Illegal RICO Crookedcommitted to The Elderly, Senior Handicap, IRS, FEMA, PrivateInsurances Companies, to include but not limited to the Plaintiffpain, suffering and direct losses Which the Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Defendantscollectively herein (Arthur et al) having been provided all of thesame exhibits during litigation in Harris County records whichDefendants collectively continue to execute a criminal schemeto still wrongfully described the Plaintiff in a nasty state withtheir strong condemning Proof of the Plaintiff Louis CharlesHamilton II being a “Derelict as described in their complaint andPlaintiff pursuit of any Federals actions means Plaintiff is a trueDerelict as described in (Arthur Esq.) reply to Plaintiff discoveryrequest. Yet these crooks forgot they are attempting to rip off(Christ et al) in the Vain of the Plaintiff name Plaintiff further assert that Plaintiff then further supplyDefendant(s) in (Arthur et al) The Plaintiff legal attempts atfurther escape from further harm, loss wages and pursue offurther civil justice as described in Plaintiff exhibit (F) Civilcomplaint made against (Trail et al) Federal Civil action No.1:09-cv-496 attached herein
    • While the Plaintiff is in further pursuit of lost income asdescribed in plaintiff exhibits (G) New Orleans civil action CauseNo. 1:09-cv-289 with the Honorable Court report andrecommendations of Dennis et al filed herein the exhibitsherein Plaintiff having in the past supplied same to Defendants in(Arthur et al) to attempt to salvage Plaintiff lost reputation atthe Hands of each and every one of the Collective Defendantsherein To include but not limited to the Plaintiff engaging in thecruel corruption already filed civil actions of the criminalinvolvements of “Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus LawsonM.D.” Against the rights, will, and dignity of the Plaintiff stupidsister Johanna Ann Magnus-Lawson (Hamilton) *See Backpage.com “Sherlock Holmes” mystery story: case of“The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” by: Louis Charles Hamilton II(Cmdr. Bluefin). But the Defendant(s) herein having defame and continualto do the same as stated to the point Plaintiff is in fact now aproven “Derelict” now for even being involved in any saidnumerous civil actions as described above in Plaintiff exhibit E,F and G Defendants reply to the Plaintiff in a legal set ofinterrogatories *See Plaintiff exhibit attached to Plaintiff motionto secure records. Arthur reply to Plaintiff interrogatories,
    • request for admission and Production of Documents. Which Plaintiff respectfully assert before the HonorableCourt said evidence was provided to Defendants collectively toconsider in making their choice of continual rash, rude, harshtreatments of the Plaintiff respect, rights for life, being now atthe hand of the defendants collective ridicule civil action. In fact the Plaintiff honest position both “past andpresent” is (Arthur et al) is full of “Fraudulent false fictitiousmassive “shifty bogus lying legal crap”. The Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ etal) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so callproperty damages, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiffalleged acts, Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard theirown “actual property value” by the Defendants onmismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps byway of the following: k. The continual human waste already complain of still be- ing published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009
    • l. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop- erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-2) photo in 2009m.The continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff ex- hibit (P-3), photo in 2009n. The continual mismanagements in nasty restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for lots of rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-4) photo in 2009o. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009p. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop- erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit the new 2010 series of pictures…. 
    • q. The pictures showing continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up dated r. The continual mismanagements in restaurant trash sim- ply left about on the ground for rodents’ for over a peri- od of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up date s. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above with 2010 photograph up detail up date. t. With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of allwrongful involvements as described by the Defendant(s) ownwording in the complaint against (Christ et al)And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of thecollectively hostile, extreme and outrageous acts and actions ofthe Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint,Amend Complaint, all motions and exhibits currently before theHonorable Court. With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at theHarris County in support of the Defendant causing Plaintiffintentional emotional harm, complete sever mental anguish
    • Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in theircruel presentations made against (Christ et al) with claims of aprofound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Publicinterest, health, and safety as described in (Arthur et al)complaint against (Christ et al) In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought toimpose a “less value of worth” towards the public impression ofthe Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate,ridicule of a scheme for monetary funds against (Christ et al)thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhile thescum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and Are too stupid to under stand the Defendants hereincollectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” Fraud Scheme ofthings for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak andunprotected cause he is street trash. Conclusion Plaintiff Amend Complaint states a long list of cause ofactions requiring the Defendant(s) collectively herein to be heldfully “responsible and most accountable” for all of thesecriminal and civil acts and actions described against the Plaintiffpeaceful rights, will, and dignity as described therein, Defendant collectively having cause enough “emotionaltrauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles
    • Hamilton II and rightfully so causing undue disrespectfulbehavior of the same criminal RICO “Mail and Wire nature toothers similarly the same. Not with standing giving the (Beacon) namely “ChristChurch Cathedral et al” a notable wrongful “black eye” in vainof the Plaintiff name Notwithstanding current exhibits with detail real facts ofall photograph evidence thus far being submitted, depicted andshowing Defendant(s) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailertrash nature in being professional Attorneys and Businessoperating out of Marine Building L.L.C.. Nasty, poor un-kept, rundown property waste conditions’ While these real dogs of a well organized syndicate stylecrooks label the Plaintiff among other things “nasty”. “A reputable lawyer will advise you to keep out of law,make the best of a foolish bargain, and not get caught again”. Mark Twain; Letter to Charles H. Webb, 8 Apr. 1875” Wherefore the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,moves now in this number above matter, Moves respectfully that the Honorable Court hereby do in
    • fact deny Defendant(s) herein the matter of defendants (Arthuret al) collective motions to dismiss the Complaint of the PlaintiffLouis Charles Hamilton II in its entirety with full extra specialprejudice, (With a added Sugar on Top) And for any and all other relief Pro Se Plaintiff herein seeksbeing awarded fairly in Justice before the Honorable Court. By; _____________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P.O. Box 20126 Houston Texas 77225 The Plaintiff will show the Above entitled “Honorable Court” that in the past (PresidentAndrew Johnson) did willfully through his criminal version of Reconstruction did establish“Second class citizenship for the (Negro) Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) BlackAfrican-American within the defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (TheState of Texas) And the Defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (The State ofTexas) continue holding the same “Second class citizenship upon the “Plaintiff in (Among otherThings) “Suit in Civil Common Law” . The Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court that the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) continue fearing that their political and social dominance is threatened in 2009 thoughout 2011, have continue turned to numerous illegal direct means to prevent (Negro) black
    • Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) from gaining equality and equal protection of the law during “CivilJudicial Proceedings” within the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant(The State of Texas). Plaintiff assert “Black Codes laws” passed by Southern state namely Co-Defendant (TheState of Texas) legislatures immediately after the “Civil War” that defined and regulated the legalstatus of the emancipated Plaintiff descendant family members as slaves The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas)immediately set about writing racist segregationist laws known as Black Codes between theyears of 1865 and 1866. The Plaintiff and his past family (Negroes) Blacks African American could not vote, holdpublic office, serve on juries, own firearms, enlist in the military, or testify in court cases involvingwhites. The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-defendant (The State of Texas)herein as of this undersigned date in the year of 2011, Continue a legal recourse system against the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) Black African-Americans inan impoverished state and under the control of all the white man control in (among other things)suit in common law that virtually strip the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein of all civil rights in suit incommon law against a “Whiteman” namely (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) in Houston Texas Because the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is a Negro (Nigger) under still established“Black Codes Laws” having been supposed, understood, said, held, aimed, and expectedabolish by the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State ofTexas) and the very idea of civil equality between the races of the Plaintiff (Negro) with the raceof (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) a “Whiteman” is as absurd, ridiculous, meaninglessincongruous and very unacceptable in suit in civil common law in 2011 within the Defendant(The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas). The Plaintiff will demonstrate before the Honorable Court that the “Dred Scott Case of1857” that the Supreme Court ruled that The Plaintiff (Negro) ancestry could not beconstitutionally considered citizens of the Defendant (The United States of America) andtherefore Plaintiff (Negro) is not covered Or furthermore the Plaintiff is not entitled by the “Bill of Rights” of the Defendants (TheUnited States of America) nor could Plaintiff (Negro) Black receive the benefits of (Defendants)herein citizenship and therefore Dred Scott could not use or file a complaint in the FederalCourt System and returned to slavery at the hands of the Defendant (The United States OfAmerica). the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against him--also ruling that the Bill of Rights didntapply to African Americans which is standing in this very date of 2011.
    • The Plaintiff will prove that the Judiciary of the Defendant (The United States of America)and (The States of Texas) has Demonstrated continual “racial bias in its rulings against thePlaintiff because he is a (Negro) doing so in favor of protection a “Whiteman” namely in thematter of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et, al, and The Marine BuildingL.L.C. which is in National News as Attached below iinvolving The Plaintiff, Defendant (Arthur etal) and Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral” as follows:Homeless Center Faces Legal BattlesBy Hasti TaghiPOSTED: Wednesday, January 13, 2010UPDATED: 12:22 pm CST January 13, 2010HOUSTON -- A day center that served more than 10,000 homeless people in downtown Houston lastyear is facing a lawsuit, KPRC Local 2 reported Tuesday. WATCH IT: Business Sues Over HomelessThe lawsuit was filed by the centers neighbor, attorney Harry Arthur. But for the homeless who use thefacility four days a week, the legal jargon isnt fixing the problem."Its not Beacons problem. Its everybodys problem," said Louis Hamilton II, a homeless veteranand client of The Beacon, which is operated by Christ Church Cathedral.Hamilton said the Beacon helps many of Houstons homeless who are finding it even more difficult to getoff the streets because of the tough economy.Hamilton said hes filing a lawsuit against Arthur, a kind of counter-attack on a lawsuit filed by a mansuing The Beacon, trying to shut it down."Over a period of a time, all the people who hang on the street and sleep on the sidewalk and urinate,defecate on everyone elses property," Arthur said. "I just finally reached a point where I just couldnttake it anymore."In the lawsuit, Arthur said the operation has "turned into a danger to the health and safety of others inthe adjacent areas and a nuisance to neighboring property owners."Arthur claims not only are businesses leaving the area, but his property value has depreciated since TheBeacon opened its doors in 2007."I dont think its possible to have that many people and operate the way they operate without itimpacting your neighbors," said Arthur.
    • The Beacon has filed its original answer to the lawsuit and denies any allegations that their clients arederelicts or are a nuisance to the community."Part of our community is the homeless community," said Tracy Burnett, executive director of TheBeacon.The Beacon is not the only homeless center in the area. According to the Coalition for the Homeless ofHouston, there are up to four more facilities in the surrounding area and the neighborly dispute isntsegregated to this area."This is something that every neighborhood complains about … that see people who are homeless intheir community whether it is one or a thousand, people are complaining," said Anthony Love of theCoalition for the Homeless.But for Arthur and several other businesses, the only solution is closing The Beacon."My thinking is, its a great idea to feed them, but I dont think they have to do it in the downtownbusiness district where people live and people are trying to operate businesses," said Arthur.The Beacon said it has taken steps to alleviate the problem. One is opening even on days that its notopen to take the homeless off the streets.Lawyers for The Beacon said their next move is to take Arthurs deposition to hear what he has to sayunder oath. If all else fails, a trial is set for Nov. 15.Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million From Lawyer Over Nuisance SuitBrenda Sapino JeffreysTexas LawyerJanuary 11, 2010Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthurfiled a state court suit in November seeking to shut down a church-sponsored opera-tion in downtown Houston that provides meals, counseling and laundry service forhomeless people.In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and The MarineBuilding, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down TheBeacon, the homeless center, on the ground its a "private nuisance."A month after Arthur filed his suit against defendants Christ Church Cathedral and TheBeacon, Louis Charles Hamilton II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 millionin actual and punitive damages from Arthur and The Marine Building and an apologyfrom Arthur in a local newspaper for allegations made in Christ Church Cathedral.In his Dec. 22 petition in Hamilton v. Arthur, et al., Hamilton says he is a veteran ofthe U.S. Navy who uses services at The Beacon.
    • Hamilton alleges that in Christ Church Cathedral Arthur and the building "unflinchingly,courageously" and with an "audaciously bold potty mouth" and a "lost aptitude on life"accused people who are fed at The Beacon of being "derelicts," among other things.Arthurs petition in Christ Church Cathedral does not mention Hamilton or any specifichomeless individuals.Hamilton alleges the plaintiffs in Christ Church Cathedral seek "ungodly pilferage" fromthe cathedral for its affiliation with The Beacon. Hamilton also alleges Arthur and thebuildinghave a "twisted heart full of unwashed socks, with a soul full of gunk Grinch type crap-pie act(s)" because of the petition they filed against the "Holy Church."Hamilton writes, "The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that at no time did thePlaintiff take a part in pissing, crapping and or vomiting or any other bodily fluid dis-charge being wrongfully placed at the property of the Defendants." Hamilton says he will prove to a judge that he is not a derelict and that Arthur andthe building chose to discriminate against him.In his petition, Hamilton asks 215th District Judge Steven Kirkland to award him $1.8million in actual damages for defamation, discriminatory practices, emotional distressand mental anguish, $600,000 in punitives and a printed apology.Hamilton, who came to Houston from Jefferson County in the summer of 2009, says inan interview that if hes successful in winning monetary damages from Arthur and hisbuilding, he will share the money with the cathedral.Hamilton says he has never met Arthur, but is anxious to talk to him in court."He ticked me off really bad ... and hes going after the church, and my grandmotherwas a nun. He disrespected my family by calling me a derelict," Hamilton says.Hamilton says he is a regular client of The Beacon and while he currently is homeless,he regularly visits a U.S. Veterans Center where he also receives his mail. The veter-ans center is located near The Beacon and The Marine Building.Arthur, of the Law Offices of Harry C. Arthur, did not return a telephone call seekinghis response to Hamiltons suit. But in a Jan. 5 interview, Arthur said,"The idea of feeding them and helping them [homeless people] is OK, but I dont thinkyou should do it with everyone around you." He said the cathedral and The Beaconshould assist the homeless somewhere outside Houstons central business district.Arthur says he receives several nasty e-mails a day about his suit.BREAK BREADIn Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving --Arthur and The Marine Building seek a minimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ
    • Church Cathedraland The Beacon to compensate them for the loss of rentals in the three-story buildingand its market value.Arthurs trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersectionfrom The Beacon. The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, anonprofit established by the cathedral.February 200467 Tex Bar J 149RESIGNATIONSOn Nov. 4, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline,of Alain G. Harvey, 41, of Houston.On Nov. 19, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline,of Gerald B. Scheve, 72, of Houston.On Oct. 1, the Supreme Court of Texas the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of BradleyDavid Waytt, 40, of Bryan.DISBARMENTSOn Nov. 12, Aaron L . Bullock, 58, of Kingwood was disbarred by the District 4-FGrievance Committee.On Nov. 13, James Richard Callahan, 52, of Addison was disbarred by the District 6-AGrievance Committee.On Nov. 30, 2003, Ghoson Gus Haddad, 49, of Houston was disbarred by the District4-A Grievance Committee.
    • On Nov. 17, Alexander Wallenwein, 44, of Houston was disbarred by the District 4-GGrievance Committee.On Oct, 27, E.J. Van Buren, Jr., 45, of Houston was disbarred by the 164th DistrictCourt of Harris County.On Aug. 27, John WorldPeace, 55, of Houston was disbarred by the 269th DistrictCourt of Harris County.SUSPENSIONSOn Nov. 20, G.A. Adesanya, 43, of Houston received a one-year, fully-probated sus-pension effective Nov. 1, 2003 from the District 4-H Grievance Committee.On Sept. 29, Ronald Delarose, 63, of Lubbock received a 15-month, fully-probated sus-pension effective Dec. 1, 2003 from the District 7-B Grievance Committee.On Oct. 31, Robert Hoffman, 58, of Dallas received a two-year, partially-probated sus-pension effective Nov. 1, 2003, with the first two months actively served and the re-mainder probated.On Nov. 5, Morris J. Kirschberg, 57, of San Antonio received a three-year, partially-probated suspension effective Nov. 21, 2003, with the first six months actively servedand the remainder probated.On Aug. 7, Oscar Rual Tamez, 72, of Houston received a six-month, fully-probated sus-pension effective Aug. 1, 2003 from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.On June 26, Carl Payne Tobey, 60, of Boerne received a one-year, fully-probated sus-pension effective Sept. 1, 2003 from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.On Oct. 21, Cheryl Gillum Turner, 46, of Houston received a one-year, partially-probat-
    • ed suspension effective Dec. 15, 2003, with the first six months actively served andthe remainder probated from the 4-D Grievance Committee.PUBLIC REPRIMANDSOn July 3, Thomas Stuart Nelson, 55, of Carrollton accepted a public reprimand fromthe District 6-A Grievance Committee.On May 8, Antonio Reyes-Vidal, 54, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand fromthe District 10-B Grievance Committee.On Nov. 5, Harry C. Arthur, 62, of Houston accepted a public reprimand from the Dis-trict 4-G Grievance Committee.On Sept. 18, 2003, Mark M. Ferguson, 42, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimandfrom the District 10-B Grievance Committee.On Nov. 6, G. Lance Holland, 53, of Odessa accepted a public reprimand from the Dis-trict 15-D Grievance Committee.On Aug. 14, Barabara Key Woodward, 49, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimandfrom the District 10-B Grievance Committee.On Sept. 18, Arthur G. Vega, 51, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from theDistrict 10-B Griecance Committee.On Oct. 9, Fernando Ramos, 56, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from theDistrict 10-B Grievance Committee.On Nov. 5, Gordon M. White, 44, of Houston accepted a public reprimand from the Dis-trict 5-A Grievance Committee.ORDER OF THE §UPRJEME COURT OF TEXAS§
    • Misc. Docket No. 03 - -.9035...c~Appointment of a District Judgeto Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary ActionThe Supreme Court of Texas hereby appointsthe Honorable Carole W. Clark, Judge ofthe 321st District Court of Smith County,Texas, to preside in the Disciplinary Action styledThe Commison for Lawyer Discipline V. Harry C. Arthurto be filed in a District Court of Harris County, Texas.The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall promptly forward to the District Clerk of HarrisCounty, Texas,a copy of the Disciplinary Petitionand this Order for filing pursuant to Rule3.03,Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.As ordered by the Supreme Court of Texas,in chambers,With the Seal thereof affixed at the CityOf Austin,this~day of March, 2003.ANDREW WEBER, CLERKSUPREME COURT OF TEXASThis assignment, made by Misc. Docket No. 03-9035,is also an assignment by the ChiefJustice of the Supreme Court pursuant to Texas Government Code, §74.057.Signed this~day of March, 2003.
    • In The District Court 215th Judicial District Harris County, Texas Cause No. 2009-80663Louis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff Plaintiff Motion to Compel Vs. Production of DocumentHarry C. Arthur (Esq.)Marine Building, L.L.C. Defendant(s) Comes Now the Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, herebyfiles a Motion to Compel Production of the followingdocuments from Defendant herein (Arthur et al) and for “goodcaused” the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court as follows:
    • IntroductionLaw 101.University of “common sense”... () IThe Attorney-Client PrivilegeBackground The Attorney – Client Privilege is an evidentiary rule thatprotects both attorneys and their clients from being compelledto disclose confidential communications between them madefor the purpose of furnishing or obtaining legal advice orassistance. The privilege is designed to foster frank, open, anduninhibited discourse between attorney and their client; So that the client’s legal needs are competently addressedby a fully prepared attorney who is cognizant of all the relevantinformation the client can provide. The attorney- client privilege may be raise during any type oflegal proceeding, civil, criminal, and or administrative, and atany time during those proceedings, pre-trail, during trail, orpost- trial. The privileged dates back to ancient Rome, wheregovernors where forbidden from calling their advocates aswitnesses out of concern that the governors would lose
    • confidence in their own defenders. In (1577) the firstevidentiary privilege recognized by the English COMMON LAWwas the attorney- client privilege. The English common lawprotected the confidential nature of attorney – clientcommunications, regardless of whether those communicationstook place in public or in private. The American coloniesadopted this approach to the attorney - client privilege, andDelaware codified the privilege in its first constitution 1776.Elements of the Attorney-Client Privilege Because the attorney- client privilege often preventsdisclosure of information that would be relevant to a legalproceeding, courts are cautious when examining objectionsgrounded in the privilege. Most courts generally require thatcertain elements be demonstrate before finding that theprivilege applies. Although the elements vary from jurisdictionto jurisdiction, one often cited recitation of the elements wasarticulated in U.S. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F. Spp.357 (D. Mass. 1950), where the court enumerated the five-parttest: (1) The person asserting the privilege must be a client orsomeone attempting to establish a relationship as a client; (2) The person with whom the client communicated mustbe an attorney and acting in the capacity as an attorney at thetime of the communication;
    • (3) The communication must be between the attorneyand the client exclusively; (4) The communication must be for the purpose ofsecuring a legal opinion, legal services, or assistances in somelegal proceeding, and for the purpose of committing a crimeor Fraud; (5) The privilege may be claimed or waived by the clientonly. Whether the client is a natural person or a corporation, theattorney-client privilege belongs only to the client and not tothe attorney. As a result, clients can prevent attorneys fromdivulging their secrets, but attorneys have no power to preventtheir clients from choosing to waive the privilege and testifyingin court, talking to the police, or otherwise sharing confidentialattorney-client information with third parties not privy to theconfidential discussions. Clients may waive attorney-clientprivilege expressly by their words or implicitly by their conduct,but a court will only find that the privilege has been waived ifthere is a clear indication that the client did not take steps tokeep the communications confidential. An attorneys or aclients inadvertent disclosure of confidential information to athird party will not normally suffice to constitute WAIVER. If aclient decides against waiving the privilege, the attorney maythen assert the privilege on behalf of the client to shield both
    • the client and the attorney from having to divulge confidentialinformation shared during their relationship. In American civil procedure, the work-product doctrineprotects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation fromdiscovery by opposing counsel.[1] It is also known as the work-product rule, the work-product immunity, the work-productprivilege (somewhat erroneous terminology), and the work-product exception.Work-Product DoctrineUnder the work-product doctrine, "tangible material or its intan-gible equivalent" that is collected or prepared in anticipation oflitigation is not discoverable,[2] And may be shielded from discovery by a Protective Order,unless the party seeking discovery can demonstrate that thesought facts can only be obtained through discovery and thatthose facts are indispensable for impeaching or substantiating aclaim.[3] That is, the party unable to obtain the information has no oth-er means of obtaining the information without undue hardship.For example, the witness may have left the country. Where therequired showing is made, the court will still protect mental im-pressions of an attorney by redacting that part of the documentcontaining the mental impressions.
    • Comparison with attorney-client privilege The work-product doctrine is more inclusive than attorney-client privilege. Unlike the attorney-client privilege, which in-cludes only communications between an attorney and his client,work-product includes materials prepared by persons other thanthe attorney himself: The materials may have been prepared byanybody as long as they were prepared with an eye towards therealistic possibility of impending litigation. Additionally, it in-cludes materials collected for the attorney such as interrogato-ries, signed statements, other information acquired for the prose-cution or defense of a case, "memoranda, briefs, communica-tions . . . other writings prepared by counsel for his own use inprosecuting his clients case . . . mental impressions, conclu-sions, opinions, or legal theories."[3]However, the work-product doctrine is also less powerful thanthe attorney-client privilege because it is not a privilege, andtherefore may be overcome by a showing of necessity, as de-scribed above.History The work-product doctrine originated in the 1947 case ofHickman v. Taylor, in which the Supreme Court affirmed aUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decisionwhich excluded from discovery of oral and written statementsmade by witnesses to a defendants attorney.[3] The SupremeCourt, acting at the recommendation of the Advisory Committeeof the Judicial Conference, later enshrined this doctrineformally in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as Rule26(b)(3).[4]
    • 1. The Plaintiff gave the Defendant in this action Harry C. Arthur Esq. the following Notice pursuant to: Rule 193.7 Notice attached to the original disclosure request of the Plaintiff; attached as Plaintiff Exhibit (H)• “Pursuant to rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of civil Pro- cedure, Plaintiff hereby gives notice that all documents produced by any Plaintiff or Defendant will be used at pretrial proceeding or at the Trial of this matter”.2. The Plaintiff filed a Third Party request with (Christ Church Cathedral et al), * attached as Plaintiff exhibit (F);3. The Plaintiff filed with Defendant (Arthur et al) (among other things) a request for Production of document * attached as Plaintiff exhibit (G)4. The Production of document for said Deposition of (Arthur et al) is the evidence (among others) the Plain- tiff now seeks and is in fact “the work product” of the (Defendant(s) Christ Church Cathedral et al) obtain ser- vices through the Law Firm of Vickery, Waldner & Mallia, LLP and Kenny IV Esq. namely (Andy & Kenny IV)5. The Plaintiff respectfully assert before this Honorable Court that all surrounding facts” in regards of the “Pro-
    • fessional legal piranhas” (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) and the work product thereof That….The Plaintiff can safely assume said “legal piranhas team” conducted such a “Hell of a work product…before hand with “precise questions of legal strategy of devastation” and being the said work production of one Hell/Holy damaging Deposition” by said way of said “work products” of (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) execution in direct examination on said defendant (Arthur et al) in the past…that;6. The Plaintiff can respectfully and safely assume and as- sert before this particular Honorable Court that the non- suit filed by (Arthur et al) in the previous action (Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) is a “direct proximate result” of their (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) “Professional legal piranhas” combine “excellent bone picking “work products” in anticipation of litiga- tion with Arthur Esq. /et al” in legal defense of and act- ing as (Attorney(s) of record for (Defendants Christ Church Cathedral et al) at the time said “Professional legal piranhas” ()…(Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) conducted said deposition…and the deposition is in no way or fashion can ever be claim the “work product” of (Arthur et al) in this particular action.
    • 7. Now Defendant to this action one (Arthur Esq. / et al) boldly and foolishly is now desecrating such the “Hon- orable Work Product” of the two Professional legal pi- ranhas” as described above.8. By way of claiming work product of another At- torney(s) namely (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Profes- sional legal piranhas” listed above who’s legal wording design in the deposition is the work product against (Arthur et al) in the past and not some materials that may having been prepared by (Arthur et al) “himself” with an eye towards the realistic possibilities in de- fense of this particular impending litigation against The Plaintiff (Hamilton II) And or materials that (Arthur Esq.) prepared in defense of him self in his on direct examination...? In the previous civil action against the “Holy Church”.9. Defendant (Arthur et al) seems to think now collectively combining his other wrongful acts and actions precisely committed and directed against the Plaintiff rights and dignity in the past that any future defamatory acts and further fraudulent practices by said defendant (Arthur et al) in the now stated claims of the work product of another Attorney(s) deposition…
    • Is the same/equivalent as if claiming the Plaintiff to be a total “water/egg head bumpkin” from Jefferson County, Texas whom happen to fallen of a Long Horn Cattle truck in a pasture field upon a petrified pieces of cow crap …thus providing the Plaintiff already being further in a state …from all leaves of his own common sense and fully rendering this Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as a previously mentioned total “water/egg head bumpkin” ignorant of all of the Civil Court laws of the United States “that even a 5th grader can figure out” in regards to the “work product” and or “Attorney/client doctrine” defendants (Arthur et al) now seeks foolish refuge under. II Arguments The Defendant(s) herein (Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (TheMarine Building L. L. C. et al) collectively hereafter named(Arthur et al) In this particular style Pro Se action, Defendant(s) (Arthuret al) collectively seeks to (among other things) cause undue-delay(s) in this cause by way of (Arthur et al) enjoyment And now fraudulent abuse by (Arthur et al) position and
    • privileges collectively as being the acting Attorney of record, Acting actually as a Attorney within the State of Texas;especially; In this cause of action over all of the Defendant(s)(Arthur et al) “legal affairs” in this particular complaint; Which “He is in the flesh being (Arthur Esq./Defendant etal) on the “court docket” acting and representing his “selfinterest” of (Arthur et al) and the Marine Building L. L. C. et alself Interest, Which “He in the flesh” in all practical sense is (ArthurEsq.) protecting Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) self interestregardless if he is an Attorney or a Civilian both having the sameinterest. Plaintiff file for among other things in a discovery devise ofa Request for Production of documents requesting (amongother things) Complete copies of all Interrogatories, Request ofAdmissions, Deposition, Defendant (Arthur et al) engaged inwith the Plaintiff Third Party namely : (Christ Church Cathedralet al), To include but not limited to, Plaintiff also requested other“relevant material discovery documents” which the Plaintiffshall address last;
    • Defendant (Arthur et al) filed suit against (“Christ ChurchCathedral et al)”, here after named (Cathedral et al) and intheir Defense of (Arthur the Plaintiff Then) Defendant then(Cathedral et al) obtain the services of the Law Firm of Vickery,Waldner & Mallia, LLP and Kenny IV Esq. Defendant(s) in this particular complaint (Arthur et al)acting as Attorney for the Plaintiff in (Arthur et al vs. Cathedralet al)) Now said defendant herein (Arthur et al) having beenserved said request for production of documents namely:Production of a Deposition Which facts correctly dictate thus said deposition havingbeen the work product by Defendants (Cathedral et al) actingAttorney(s) of record (Vickery and Kenny IV) with otherpossible valuable discovery document(s) being requested from(Arthur et al) in connection to work product of said actingAttorneys of record listed above before the behalf of the HolyChurch; Namely Christ Church Cathedral; Moreover (Vickery & Kenny IV) them-self in factconducted said deposition on said Defendant(s) (Cathedral etal) behalf during this same time period with (Arthur Esq.) underdirect examination of the work product of (Vickery & KennyIV) in the previously action now filed under a non-suit statusin (Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (The Marine Building L. L. C. et al)
    • vs. Cathedral et al)); Both (Vickery & Kenny IV) them-self in fact having beenpreviously in preparation in anticipation of an eye towards therealistic possibility of impending litigation in the actionpreviously already done in the past; Which he” (Arthur et al) is also in fact a Defendant now;instead of the Plaintiff in the past; to this action; Which he” (Arthur et al) now boldly , fraudulent andfoolishly refused to comply with the Plaintiff legal rights of aDiscovery request device for Production of Documents namely“Deposition” being already conducted against this particulardefendant to this action (Among other things) and said request is now attached asPlaintiff exhibit (G) herein with the records to this cause; And he” (Arthur et al) seeks to imply and invoke some sortof Attorney - client privilege and work – product doctrine existover the Plaintiff Production request in favor for the defendant(Arthur Esq. / et al) to this action; To include but not limited to defendants (Arthur et al)express wishes to invoke said Attorney/client privileges whensuch a levy against the Plaintiff rightful discovery request doesnot exist for said defendant;
    • To include but not limited to such outstanding facts that(Arthur et al) most certainly do not meet the pre-requisiterequirements and previews that’s list below: (1) The person asserting the privilege must be a client orsomeone attempting to establish a relationship as a client; (2) The person with whom the client communicated mustbe an attorney and acting in the capacity as an attorney at thetime of the communication; (3) The communication must be between the attorneyand the client exclusively; (4) The communication must be for the purpose ofsecuring a legal opinion, legal services, or assistances in somelegal proceeding, and for the purpose of committing a crimeor Fraud; (5) The privilege may be claimed or waived by the clientonly. To include but not limited to such further outstanding factsthat (Arthur et al) most certainly do not meet the pre-requisiterequirements and previews of the work- product doctrine that’slist below: “The materials may have been prepared by anybody aslong as they were prepared with an eye towards the realistic
    • possibility of impending litigation” Defendant (Arthur et al) cannot reasonably be claimingnow before the Plaintiff and this Honorable Court that the workproduct of (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legalpiranhas” prepared materials that was induce in a depositionagainst (Arthur Esq.) was intended for this particular Plaintiff(Hamilton II)” Civil Action to be frozen under a “Work –productof the Attorney/client relationship between (Arthur Esq.) andhis client (Arthur et al); To include but not limited to all materials, writingsprepared, memoranda, briefs, communications. . To include also mental impressions, conclusions, opinions,or legal theories." And or other writings prepared by andcollected for the Attorney(s), (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) such asinterrogatories, request for admissions, signed statements,other information acquired for the defense of (Arthur Esq.) in(Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (The Marine Building L. L. C. et al) vs.(Cathedral et al)); is also the work-product of (Arthur Esq.) inthis particular civil action Hamilton II vs. Arthur et al..? All of the said discovery request(s) the Plaintiff (HamiltonII) seeks is very relevant and in the direct scope of theseproceedings by way of all of the subject matter that’s having inthe past being at issue in (Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedralet al) Defendant(s) and most certainly in the media
    • 25 In regards to among other things the Issues ofDefendants (Arthur et al) label/calling Plaintiff among others a“Derelict” of Houston TX with the rest of Beacon clients amongothers ; Which common sense dictate these facts among manyothers surly having been discuss in the previous action in(Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) underdirect examination of the “work product deposition” of (Andy& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal piranhas” in defense of(Arthur Esq.) in the past; And the Plaintiff is entitled to review each and all saiddocuments, materials, evidences and namely the depositionpreviously conducted against (Arthur et al) in this regard. Under the work-product doctrine, "tangible material or itsintangible equivalent" that is collected or prepared inanticipation of litigation is not discoverable, However the “work product” of another (Attorneys) worknamely (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legalpiranhas” having been mention above; And their combine work product(s) efforts that beenprepared in defense and anticipation of the Plaintiff at the Timenamely (Arthur et al vs. Christ Church Cathedral) And his ungodly attempt to achieve among other things
    • monetary awards of $250,000.00 of the Plaintiff “ear markpoor man money” from the “Holy Church “ Namely (Christ Church Cathedral et al) with a furthercommit acts and actions made by defendant (Arthur et al) of a“definite & forever” sought closure of the Plaintiffs’ “Feed-n-Wash Hole” To include but not limited to facts of Defendants (Arthur etal) posing as the Grinch and committed to the pilferage of thePlaintiff “Christmas Holidays of 2009” Whom (Arthur Esq.) of this present time; Now acting as “legal counsel” for Defendant (Arthur et al)in this action …whom both being the same seeking to“fraudulently abuse” the Attorney-client privilege, With further distortion of fact by way of fraudulentmisrepresentation & flagrant claims of the “work product-doctrine” of Another Attorneys work-product(s) in regards tothe discovery request made by the Plaintiff for said depositionbeing conducted against (Arthur Esq. / et al) in the past action(Arthur et al Plaintiff vs. Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) * The Plaintiff respectfully refer the Honorable court to seedefinition below
    • Distortion of Fact A representor may make a statement which prima facie istechnically true; however this may tell only half the story. If astatement of fact is made but the representor fails to include in-formation which would significantly alter the interpretation ofthis fact, then a misrepresentation may have occurred. Fraudulent misrepresentation (Derry v. Peek) occurswhen one makes representation with intent to deceive and withthe knowledge that it is false. A false representation of a matter of fact—whether bywords or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, orby concealment of what should have been disclosed—thatdeceives and is intended to deceive another so that the in-dividual will act upon it to her or his legal injury. Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calcu-lated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may becalled a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specificoffense with certain features. flagrant - conspicuously and outrageously bad orreprehensible; "a crying shame"; "an egregious lie"; "flagrantviolation of human rights"; "a glaring error"; "gross ineptitude";"gross injustice"; "rank treachery" The Plaintiff is appearing Pro Se in this action with theDefendant(s) (Arthur et al/ Esq.) enactment of a “ranktreachery of a shame before the Honorable Court at theexpense of the Plaintiff
    • In regards to distortion of facts by way of fraudulentmisrepresentation & flagrant claims of the work product-product doctrine of another attorney’s work-product(s) inregards to the discovery request made by the Plaintiff for saiddeposition as described above to include but not limited to: Further attempts at bully the weight of the legal lawdefinition(s) in regards to “Derelict”, “Attorney/client”, “work-product” and “nuisances” through-out the entire civil actiondiscovery process as the Defendants (Arthur et al) continuepattern and practices having already achieved (1) counter suit(2) media “hate mail” & exposure (no man should ever, ever,wish upon himself”) self inflicted placement of being at a stateof a “unholy out cast” of some sort for crimes against humanrespectful nature”. (3) Exposure for his staff of Law Office ofHarry C. Arthur receiving wrongful vulgar cussing out; whichshould having been directed at (Arthur Esq.) by this individualperson to his face by some unknown individual …for provokingsuch wrongful behavior …of two wrongs don’t make a right” yetArthur started this problem in regards to defamatory anddiscriminatory acts and actions To include but not limited to previously stated “above”and “below” notice facts “timely served” upon the saidDefendant(s) (Arthur et al) in this action of the Plaintiff intenton acting in his best legal benefit
    • And gain in regards to Plaintiff entitlement of a pursuit ofjustice for this civil action. Pursuant to rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of civilProcedure, Plaintiff hereby gives notice that all documentsproduced by any Plaintiff or Defendant will be used at pretrialproceeding or at the Trial of this matter which Plaintiff mostcertainly intend on doing so in this particular cause of action. III Conclusion Defendant herein continue(s) to express the desire topilferage and “You Know the Old saying” The Attorney whoRepresent himself has got a fool for a client;” Wherefore the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II,for the above stated reasoning move the Honorable Court toissues an Honorable order requiring Defendant; Harry C. Arthur (Esq.) Produce to the Plaintiff a Full,correct, certified and complete copy of the deposition asstated above
    • Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2010And Respectfully Submitted By, ____________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P. O. Box 20126 Houston Texas, 77225 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Thread Tools Rating: Display Modes
    • 01-19-2 #1011,03:55 PMbl Cmdr. Bluefin Special Public Notice: 2011”uefinlch To: The President of the United States of America2 To: Gov. “Rick Perry”SeniorMem To: Charlie Sheen & Familyber To: 112 CongressJoin To: Sarah PalinDate: Aug2010 First to the “Bitch” the Flag is at full staff (Today), the nation has mourn, and I will be smoking (Cajun Red hot) …up your dizzy extra silly “Bitch” who like to start shitLocation: fucking Semi-Attractive in a 3:00 AM drunk dark bar Ass,…..Sarah Palin..xoxoHous 1. You were well fucking covered in my Civil Action suit just days later …..what theton Defendants (The United States of America) get’s ….lot’s of per-target murder… and itPosts was well plan to the “Fucking (“John-Boot”) by a “Retarded Extra thick Water Head: 101 boy” waiting on a jolly pop-n-lethal injection cocktail. 2. You have the (Media) looking like “Creeping Whores” fucking waiting for your throw in the “Red Extra thick Neck Towel” into the ring for …President of the Oval office …. 3. Hurry the fuck up… so I can fire up a special smoke…and laugh...”Dumb Bitch….. 4. Earth to “Sarah Palin” “Just what do you think I am going to do when I drag the Defendants (The United States of America) Ass to Federal Court” 5. “Bitch”….get the real short mini skirt, pink panties,.... The (8) color circus “Fucking Make up on” have a bowl of oat meal and have a fucking seat at the Cmdr. Bluefin “Special Video Deposition”…and if ya refuse the Federal Invitation…..”
    • 6. Well That Mean Old (U.S.D. A.) “Honorable Texas “Hang em High” Federal Judge…will instructed my Secrete special, special, friends ….The Fighting Boys from (USMS)“United States Marshall Services” to send one of them “Jet’s …(Cmdr. Bluefin) may ina dark crazy fucked up dream possibly in a manner of sleep walking of “some crazynigger MI3 sorts” forfeiture for possibly them (DEA) Freak’s.7. And Drag your Ass by the Hair….for a real “Nigger Deposition Interrogation” intojust what the fucking possible (among other things) have substances foradvancement of the (Negro) species…” in this life time”.8. You might caution your silly good starting dumb shit self before (USMS) Con-Airflight and want to use a pre- laxative in light of a well needed “Extreme NiggerInterrogation” smell good too……K.......Next………112 Congress (You Butt Holes) if you do not work with the President of theUnited States (ASAP), when I send you a Federal summons to the “Nigger Deposition”you might want to really consider jumping out of the (12) floor fucking window(ASAP) and on your way down slap ya mom with a 22 oz. framing hammer..Then rather have me Respectfully request that “Mean Old Hang em High TexasFederal Honorable Judge to slap your Scank Ass in a seat next to the (“Bitch”) on“Con Air” and come see the “Commander Bluefin” for a real “Nigger Interrogation”and you can bet your red neck hush puppy ass... I em going to hand pick the biggestprick in the 112 Congress place and “Fuck em up real nigger good too….then post yaWeak Greedy Fucked up Ass on (YouTube)…..Next…….Charlie Sheen & Family, Dude how it is going, (Bro)…(You Guys have done a lot for the poor of all colors, especially ya dad (Martin)…xoxoxooxx.....Think (Cmdr. Bluefin) was just going to leave ya fucking stinking and just like
    • hanging” .....(Smooooooch)… Love the “4 Star Soup Kitchen” @ Santa Monica Beach CA….way back then I fix the small leak on the roof and had some free 4 star chow, YourCrazy (Charlie Sheen) Ass came through the back alley way to your Dad’s SoupKitchen Place back door to do you required (court order) community services…(Washing them dam dishes)…..ha, ha,.....though I forgot ya hun…..xoxoxoox (Took a picture with ya and kept it on the workship one day and a crooked sea weed bitch bastard rip it off”) ...when I threw a real party at the (Reconstruction Nigger Party in DC) you and thewhole family got my extended let’s party till ya drop and hurry the fuck up and pukeinvite…….xoxooxP.S. and another Photo Op. please… (Da)…Next: Gov. “Rick Perry” (Ya Good Suit Wearing “Motherfucker”)…xoxoox..Love the “inaugural taunt” to the Defendants (The United States of America) & youbet ya” you…“good suit wearing Republican Ass” the “Lone Star State namely (Texas)will lead the Fuck up Nation out of fucking turmoil....…cuss…. I (Cmdr. Bluefin) fixing to extra boot the silly shit out of them straight thefuck up to see the “Mean Old Hang em High Texas U.S.D.A. Federal Honorable Judgefor a real cripple crooked red neck hanging…P.S. Gov Rick Perry while ya cutting poor nigger funds, just remember one very, veryimportant got dam thing….ya better not fuck with the “Christ Church Cathedral”(Beacon) soup kitchen in Houston Texas (Funds)…
    • then your good suit wearing ass… will end up looking like (Houston ScroogeAttorney…. Harry C. Arthur et al)......and then ya can really forget the Fucking run for the Republican shot at “Oval Office”in DC………Da” ha, ha, xoxox”And finally to the “President of the United States of America”1. Sorry for the mess in Federal court (Not)…..ha, ha,2. Very Extra Special Sweet Good Holy Job...on the Mess in Arizona”3. Man Bro…I can hear the “First Lady” cussing you the “fuck out” all the way downhere in the “Gulf Coast….You’re the President of the “Got Dam United States of America), and you think yougoing to go and play “Basketball again and get your neck broke the next time insteadof you’re busted up lip….Not on my (First Lady Wife) watch, you got that Crazy 112 Congress, Sarah Fuckedup Bitch Ass to deal with, bla….bla…..Big Oil…….bla bla…….Fucking National Healthand Human Services fucked up mess…….bla bla bla………..”National Budget”…….blabla……..”Dam War”…blab la…Inadequate Mental Health Services”……bla bla….and thatcrazy black Cajun if ya fucking forgot filed a Dam “Nigger Civil Action” too…Crazyblack fucker wants (18 Trillion Dollars)…So ya better play some “One Hand Dam Scrabble” on “Air Force One” for fun eat atuna sandwich…and get to “Fucking Work”….ya lazy, no good shooting 3 point anyway “Presidential bloke”…..“Well Mr. President Bro”…... you just tell the Little “First Lady” (Commander Bluefin)Got ya Back…
    • .you just tell her… I said…. fuck some dam “one hand scrabble” for fucking “real fun and relaxing”… .and she knows what she really got to do… …..if not”….. “Cmdr. Bluefin” is sending in the expert ….“Monica Lewinski” ....... .... “Oppppps Snapple”…..”What that mom got to go to “Sam Club” for ya and pick you up a crate of “Kotex” ........ they having a buy one crate and get one crate free sale…. .you got a dam fucking coupon….. (Double Fucking Kotex Crate Rats)…. well time for some dial tones…..Cmdr. Bluefin going off line….xoxoxo.....bluefinlch2View Public ProfileFind More Posts by bluefinlch2 #201
    • -20-2011,02:06AM do i hear fucking party Cmdr. Bluefin style....xoxoxoxopopc Popciti crashing the Rizanch.....Cajun BarbequeitiJuniorMemberJoinDate:Aug2010Location:HoustonPosts:4
    • popcitiViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbypopciti 01-20-2011 #3, 09:25AM Sarah Louise Palin (pronounced /ˈpeɪlɨn/ ( listen); née Heath; born 2/ 11, 1964Cambodia Sarah Louise Palin (pronounced /ˈpeɪlɨn/ ( listen); née Heath; born February 11,Junior 1964) is an American politician, author, speaker, and political news commentator whoMembe was the youngest person and the first woman elected Governor of Alaska. She servedr as governor from December 2006 until she resigned in 2009, rather than becoming a lame duck and continuing to defend against what she regarded as frivolous ethics complaints. Chosen by Republican Party presidential candidate John McCain in AugustJoin 2008 to be his running mate in that years presidential election,[11] she was the firstDate:Sep Alaskan on the national ticket of a major party, as well as the first female vice-2010 presidential nominee of the Republican Party.Location: On July 3, 2009, Palin announced she would not seek re-election as governor andHousto that she was resigning effective July 26, 2009, eighteen months before then completion of her term. She cited ethics complaints that had been filed following herPosts: selection as running mate to John McCain as one of the reasons for her resignation,6 saying the resulting investigations had affected her ability to govern the state.[12] [13][14][15] Speculation that she will run for the Republican Party presidential
    • nomination in 2012 began prior to the defeat of the McCain–Palin ticket in 2008.[16][17]Before she was elected governor, she was a member of the Wasilla, Alaska CityCouncil from 1992 to 1996, and the citys mayor from 1996 to 2002. After anunsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor of Alaska in 2002, she chaired theAlaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission from 2003 until she resigned in 2004.In November 2009, her autobiography Going Rogue: An American Life was releasedand it quickly became a best-seller, selling more than two million copies.[18] InJanuary 2010, Palin began providing political commentary to the Fox News Channelunder a multi-year contract.[19] It was announced in March 2010 that she was tohost her own TV show, called Sarah Palins Alaska. Palin authored a second book,America by Heart, which was released on November 23, 2010.[18]Early life and careerPalin was born in Sandpoint, Idaho, the third of four children(three daughters, one son) to Charles R. "Chuck" Heath, a science teacher and trackcoach, and Sarah "Sally" (née Sheeran), a school secretary. She is of English, Irishand German descent.[3] Her siblings are Chuck Jr. (born February 7, 1962), Heather(Bruce) (born January 28, 1963), and Molly (McCann) (born November 26, 1966).[20][21][22][23][24] While Palin was an infant, the family moved to Skagway,Alaska, where her father worked as a teacher.[25] After five years, the family movedto Eagle River, but relocated to Wasilla in 1972, when she was 8 years old.[26][27]Palin played flute in the junior high band, then attended Wasilla High School whereshe was the head of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes,[10] and a member of thegirls basketball and cross country running teams.[28] During her senior year, shewas co-captain and point guard of the basketball team that won the Alaska statechampionship, earning the nickname "Sarah Barracuda" for her competitive streak.[29][30][31]In 1984, Palin won the Miss Wasilla beauty pageant.[32][33] She finished third in theMiss Alaska pageant,[34][35] playing flute in the talent portion of the contest,[36]and receiving both the Miss Congeniality award and a college scholarship.[29]After graduating from high school, Palin enrolled at the University of Hawaii in Hilo.[37] Shortly after arriving in Hawaii, Palin switched to Hawaii Pacific University for asemester in the fall of 1982 and then North Idaho College in the spring and fall of1983.[38] In June 2008, the Alumni Association of North Idaho College gave her itsDistinguished Alumni Achievement Award.[39] She attended the University of Idahoin the fall of 1984 and spring of 1985, and attended Matanuska-Susitna College in thefall of 1985. Palin returned to the University of Idaho in the spring of 1986, receivingher bachelors degree in communications with an emphasis in journalism in 1987.[6][38][40][41]After graduating, she worked as a sportscaster for KTUU-TV and KTVA-TV in
    • Anchorage,[42][43] and as a sports reporter for the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman,[44][45] fulfilling an early ambition.[46]On August 29, 1988, she eloped with her high school sweetheart Todd Palin;according to her later account, this was to spare her parents the expense of a "bigwhite wedding".[47][48][49][50] After the marriage, she helped in her husbandscommercial fishing business.[51]Early political careerMain articles: Early political career of Sarah Palin and Electoralhistory of Sarah PalinThroughout her tenure on the city council and the rest of her political career, Palinhas remained a Republican, first registering as such in 1982.[52] Palin was elected tothe Wasilla City Council in 1992 winning 530 votes to 310.[53][54] She ran forreelection in 1995, winning by 413 votes to 185.[55]Mayor of WasillaMotivated by concerns that revenue from a new Wasilla sales taxwould not be spent wisely,[48] Palin ran for mayor of Wasilla in 1996, defeatingincumbent mayor John Stein[56] 651 to 440 votes.[57] Her biographer has describedher campaign as targeting wasteful spending and high taxes;[29] her opponent Steinhas said that Palin introduced abortion, gun rights, and term limits as campaignissues.[58] The election was nonpartisan, but the state Republican Party took theunprecedented step of running advertisements for Palin.[58] Palin ran for re-electionagainst Stein in 1999 and won, 909 votes to 292.[59] In 2002, she completed thesecond of the two consecutive three-year terms she was allowed to serve by the citycharter.[60] She was elected president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors[61] in1999.[62]First termDuring her first year in office, Palin kept a jar with the names of Wasillaresidents on her desk. Once a week, she pulled out a name, picked up the phone andasked: "Hows the city doing?"[63] Using income generated by a 2% sales tax thathad been approved by Wasilla voters in October 1992,[64] Palin cut property taxesby 75% and eliminated personal property and business inventory taxes.[56][65]Using municipal bonds, she made improvements to the roads and sewers, andincreased funding to the Police Department.[58] She also oversaw new bike pathsand procured funding for storm-water treatment to protect freshwater resources.[56]At the same time, she shrank the local museums budget and deterred talk of a newlibrary and city hall.[56]Shortly after taking office in October 1996, Palin eliminated the position of museumdirector[66] and asked for updated resumes and resignation letters from "citydepartment heads who had been loyal to Stein,"[67] including the police chief, publicworks director, finance director, and librarian.[68] Palin stated this request was to findout their intentions and whether they supported her.[68] She temporarily requireddepartment heads to get her approval before talking to reporters, saying that theyfirst needed to become acquainted with her administrations policies.[68] She createdthe position of city administrator,[58] and reduced her own $68,000 salary by 10%,
    • although by mid-1998 this was reversed by the city council.[69]In October 1996, Palin asked library director Mary Ellen Emmons if she would objectto the removal of a book from the library if people were picketing to have the bookremoved.[70] Emmons responded that she would, and others as well.[70] Palinexplained that she had been trying to get to know her staff and had been discussingmany issues with them "both rhetorical and realistic in nature."[70] No books wereremoved and no attempt was made to remove books from the library during Palinstenure as mayor.[71]Palin said she fired Police Chief Irl Stambaugh because he did not fully support herefforts to govern the city.[72] Stambaugh filed a lawsuit alleging wrongfultermination and violation of his free speech rights.[73] The judge dismissedStambaughs lawsuit, holding that that the police chief served at the discretion of themayor, and could be terminated for nearly any reason, even a political one,[74][75]and ordered Stambaugh to pay Palins legal fees.[74]Wasilla City HallLocation of Wasilla, AlaskaSecond termDuring her second term as mayor, Palinproposed and promoted the construction of a municipal sports center to be financedby a 0.5%[58] sales tax increase and $14.7 million bond issue.[76] Voters approvedthe measure by a 20 vote margin and the Wasilla Multi-Use Sports Complex was builton time and under budget. However, the city spent an additional $1.3 million becauseof an eminent domain lawsuit caused by the failure to obtain clear title to theproperty before beginning construction.[76] The citys long-term debt grew fromabout $1 million to $25 million due to $15 million for the sports complex, $5.5 millionfor street projects, and $3 million for water improvement projects. The Wall StreetJournal characterized the project as a "financial mess".[76] A city council memberdefended the spending increases as being caused by the citys growth during thattime.[77]Palin also joined with nearby communities in hiring the Anchorage-based lobbyingfirm of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh to lobby for federal funds. The firm securednearly $8 million in earmarks for the Wasilla city government,[78] including $500,000for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, and $900,000 for sewerrepairs.[79]In 2008, Wasillas current mayor credited Palins 75 percent property tax cuts andinfrastructure improvements with bringing "big-box stores" and 50,000 shoppers perday to Wasilla.[53] A local gun store owner said Palin made the town "more of acommunity ... Its no longer a little strip town that you can blow through in aheartbeat."[53] At the conclusion of Palins tenure as mayor in 2002, the city hadabout 6,300 residents.[80][clarification needed]State-level politicsIn 2002, Palin ran for the Republican nomination for lieutenant
    • governor, coming in second to Loren Leman in a five-way Republican primary.[81]Following her defeat, she campaigned throughout the state for the Republicangovernor-lieutenant governor ticket of Frank Murkowski and Loren Leman.[82]Murkowski and Leman won, Murkowski resigned from his long-held U.S. Senate seatin December 2002 to assume the governorship. Palin was said to be on the "shortlist" of possible appointees to Murkowskis U.S. Senate seat,[82] but Murkowskiultimately appointed his daughter, State Representative Lisa Murkowski, as hissuccessor in the Senate.[83]Governor Murkowski offered a number of other jobs to Palin, and in February 2003,she accepted an appointment to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission,which oversees Alaskas oil and gas fields for safety and efficiency.[82] Although shehad little background in the area, she said she wanted to learn more about the oilindustry, and was named chair of the commission and ethics supervisor.[1][82][84]By November 2003 she was filing non-public ethics complaints with the stateattorney general and the governor against a fellow commission member, RandyRuedrich, a former petroleum engineer and the current chair of the state RepublicanParty.[82] Palin had observed Ruedrich doing Party business on the states time, andleaking confidential information to oil industry insiders. He was forced to resign inNovember 2003.[82] Palin resigned in January 2004 and put her protests againstRuedrichs "lack of ethics" into the public arena[29][82] by filing a public complaintagainst Ruedrich,[85] who was then fined $12,000. She also joined with Democraticlegislator Eric Croft[86] in complaining that Gregg Renkes, a former Alaskan AttorneyGeneral,[87] had a financial conflict of interest in negotiating a coal exporting tradeagreement.[88][89] Renkes also resigned his post.[29][84]From 2003 to June 2005, Palin served as one of three directors of "Ted StevensExcellence in Public Service, Inc.," a 527 group designed to provide political trainingfor Republican women in Alaska.[90] In 2004, Palin told the Anchorage Daily Newsthat she had decided not to run for the U.S. Senate that year against the Republicanincumbent Lisa Murkowski because her teenage son opposed it. Palin said, "Howcould I be the team mom if I was a U.S. Senator?"[91]Governor of AlaskaMain article: Governorship of Sarah PalinPalin visits soldiers of the Alaska National Guard, July 24, 2007.In 2006, running on aclean-government platform, Palin defeated incumbent Governor Frank Murkowski inthe Republican gubernatorial primary.[92][93] Her running mate was State SenatorSean Parnell.In the November election, Palin was outspent but victorious, defeating formerDemocratic governor Tony Knowles by a margin of 48.3% to 40.9%.[29] She becameAlaskas first female governor, and, at the age of 42, the youngest governor inAlaskan history, the states first governor to have been born after Alaska achievedU.S. statehood, and the first not to be inaugurated in Juneau (she chose to have theceremony held in Fairbanks instead). She took office on December 4, 2006, and for
    • most of her term was very popular with Alaska voters. Polls taken in 2007 showedher with 93% and 89% popularity among all voters,[94] which led some mediaoutlets to call her "the most popular governor in America."[86][94] A poll taken inlate September 2008 after Palin was named to the national Republican ticket showedher popularity in Alaska at 68%.[95] A poll taken in May 2009 showed Palinspopularity among Alaskans was at 54% positive and 41.6% negative.[96]Palin declared that top priorities of her administration would be resourcedevelopment, education and workforce development, public health and safety, andtransportation and infrastructure development. She had championed ethics reformthroughout her election campaign. Her first legislative action after taking office wasto push for a bipartisan ethics reform bill. She signed the resulting legislation in July2007, calling it a "first step", and declaring that she remained determined to clean upAlaska politics.[97]Palin frequently broke with the state Republican establishment.[98][99] For example,she endorsed Sean Parnells bid to unseat the states longtime at-large U.S.Representative, Don Young,[100] and she publicly challenged then-Senator TedStevens to come clean about the federal investigation into his financial dealings.Shortly before his July 2008 indictment, she held a joint news conference withStevens, described by The Washington Post as intended to "make clear she had notabandoned him politically."[90]Palin promoted oil and natural gas resource development in Alaska, including drillingin the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Proposals to drill for oil in ANWR havebeen the subject of a national debate.[101]In 2006, Palin obtained a passport[102] and in 2007 traveled for the first timeoutside of North America on a trip to Kuwait. There she visited the Khabari AlawazemCrossing at the Kuwait–Iraq border and met with members of the Alaska NationalGuard at several bases.[103] On her return trip, she visited injured soldiers inGermany.[104]Budget, spending, and federal fundsPalin in Germany, July 2007In June 2007, Palin signed a record $6.6 billion operatingbudget into law.[105] At the same time, she used her veto power to make thesecond-largest cuts of the construction budget in state history. The $237 million incuts represented over 300 local projects, and reduced the construction budget to$1.6 billion.[106]In 2008, Palin vetoed $286 million, cutting or reducing funding for 350 projects fromthe FY09 capital budget.[107]Palin followed through on a campaign promise to sell the Westwind II jet, a purchasemade by the Murkowski administration for $2.7 million in 2005 against the wishes ofthe legislature.[108] In August 2007, the jet was listed on eBay, but the sale fell
    • through, and the plane was later sold for $2.1 million through a private brokeragefirm.[109]Gubernatorial expendituresPalin lived in Juneau during the legislative session andlived in Wasilla and worked out of offices in Anchorage the rest of the year. Since theoffice in Anchorage is 565 miles from Juneau, while she worked there, state officialssaid she was permitted to claim a $58 per diem travel allowance, which she took (atotal of $16,951), and to reimbursement for hotels, which she did not, choosinginstead to drive about 50 miles to her home in Wasilla.[110] She also chose not touse the former governors private chef.[111] Republicans and Democrats havecriticized Palin for taking the per diem and $43,490 in travel expenses for the timesher family accompanied her on state business.[112][113] In response, Palins stafferssaid that these practices were in line with state policy, that her gubernatorialexpenses are 80% below those of her predecessor, Frank Murkowski,[112] and that"many of the hundreds of invitations Palin receives include requests for her to bringher family, placing the definition of state business with the party extending theinvitation."[110] In February 2009, the State of Alaska, reversing a policy that hadtreated the payments as legitimate business expenses under the Internal RevenueCode, decided that per diems paid to state employees for stays in their own homeswill be treated as taxable income and will be included in employees gross income ontheir W-2 forms.[114] Palin herself had ordered the review of the tax policy.[115]In December 2008, an Alaska state commission recommended increasing theGovernors annual salary from $125,000 to $150,000. Palin stated that she would notaccept the pay raise.[116] In response, the commission dropped therecommendation.[117]Federal fundingIn her State of the State address on January 17, 2008, Palin declaredthat the people of Alaska "can and must continue to develop our economy, becausewe cannot and must not rely so heavily on federal government [funding]."[118]Alaskas federal congressional representatives cut back on pork-barrel projectrequests during Palins time as governor; despite this, in 2008 Alaska was still thelargest per-capita recipient of federal earmarks, requesting nearly $750 million inspecial federal spending over a period of two years.[119]While there is no sales tax or income tax in Alaska, state revenues doubled to $10billion in 2008. For the 2009 budget, Palin gave a list of 31 proposed federalearmarks or requests for funding, totaling $197 million, to Alaska Senator TedStevens.[120][121] Palin has stated that her decreasing support for federal fundingwas a source of friction between her and the states congressional delegation; Palinrequested less in federal funding each year than her predecessor Frank Murkowskirequested in his last year.[122]Bridge to NowhereMain article: Gravina Island BridgeIn 2005, before Palin was elected governor, Congress passed a $442-million earmarkfor constructing two Alaska bridges as part of an omnibus spending bill. The Gravina
    • Island Bridge received nationwide attention as a symbol of pork-barrel spending,following news reports that the bridge would cost $233 million in Federal funds.Because Gravina Island, the site of the Ketchikan airport, has a population of 50, thebridge became known nationally as the "Bridge to Nowhere". Following an outcry bythe public and some members of the U.S. Senate, Congress eliminated the bridgeearmark from the spending bill but gave the allotted funds to Alaska as part of itsgeneral transportation fund.[123]Palin holds up a t-shirt reading "Nowhere Alaska 99901" while visiting Ketchikanduring her Gubernatorial campaign in 2006; the ZIP code for the area is 99901.In2006, Palin ran for governor with a "build-the-bridge" plank in her platform,[124]saying she would "not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project ... into somethingthats so negative."[125] Palin criticized the use of the word "nowhere" as insulting tolocal residents[124][126] and urged speedy work on building the infrastructure"while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."[126]As governor, Palin canceled the Gravina Island Bridge in September 2007, saying thatCongress had "little interest in spending any more money" due to what she called"inaccurate portrayals of the projects."[127] Alaska chose not to return the $442million in federal transportation funds.[128]In 2008, as a vice-presidential candidate, Palin characterized her position as havingtold Congress "thanks, but no thanks, on that bridge to nowhere." This angered someAlaskans in Ketchikan, who said that the claim was false and a betrayal of Palinsprevious support for their community.[128] Some critics complained that thisstatement was misleading, since she had expressed support for the spending projectand kept the Federal money after the project was canceled.[129] Palin was alsocriticized for allowing construction of a 3-mile access road, built with $25 million inFederal transportation funds set aside as part of the original bridge project, tocontinue. A spokesman for Alaskas Department of Transportation made a statementthat it was within Palins power to cancel the road project, but also noted that thestate was still considering cheaper designs to complete the bridge project, and that inany case, the road would open up the surrounding lands for development.[130][131]Gas pipelineSee also: Alaska gas pipelineIn August 2008, Palin signed a bill authorizing the State of Alaska to awardTransCanada Pipelines — the sole bidder to meet the states requirements — a licenseto build and operate a pipeline to transport natural gas from the North Slope to theContinental United States through Canada.[132] The governor also pledged $500million in seed money to support the project.[133] It is estimated that the project willcost $26 billion.[132] Newsweek described the project as "the principal achievementof Sarah Palins term as Alaskas governor."[134] The pipeline faces legal challengesfrom Canadian First Nations.[134]Predator controlSee also: Governorship of Sarah Palin#Environment
    • In 2007, Palin supported a 2003 Alaska Department of Fish and Game policy allowingthe hunting of wolves from the air as part of a predator control program intended toincrease moose and caribou populations for subsistence-food gatherers and otherhunters.[135][136] In March 2007, Palins office announced that a bounty of $150per wolf would be paid to the 180 volunteer pilots and gunners, to offset fuel costs, infive areas of Alaska. 607 wolves had been killed in the prior four years. Statebiologists wanted 382 to 664 wolves to be killed by the end of the predator-controlseason in April 2007. Wildlife activists sued the state, and a state judge declared thebounty illegal on the basis that a bounty would have to be offered by the Board ofGame and not by the Department of Fish and Game.[135][137]Public Safety Commissioner dismissalMain article: Alaska Public Safety CommissionerdismissalPalin dismissed Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan on July 11, 2008, citingperformance-related issues, such as not being "a team player on budgetingissues"[138] and "egregious rogue behavior."[139] Palin attorney Thomas Van Fleinsaid that the "last straw" was Monegans planned trip to Washington, D.C., to seekfunding for a new, multimillion-dollar sexual assault initiative the governor hadnt yetapproved.[140] Monegan said that he had resisted persistent pressure from Palin, herhusband, and her staff, including State Attorney General Talis J. Colberg, to firePalin’s ex-brother-in-law, Alaska State Trooper Mike Wooten; Wooten was involved ina child custody battle with Palin’s sister after a bitter divorce that included an allegeddeath threat against Palins father.[141][142] At one point Sarah and Todd Palin hireda private investigator to gather information, seeking to have Wooten officiallydisciplined.[143] Monegan stated that he learned an internal investigation had foundall but two of the allegations to be unsubstantiated, and Wooten had been disciplinedfor the others — an illegal moose killing and the tasering of his 11-year-old stepson(the child reportedly asked to be tasered).[142] He told the Palins that there wasnothing he could do because the matter was closed.[144] When contacted by thepress for comment, Monegan first acknowledged pressure to fire Wooten but saidthat he could not be certain that his own firing was connected to that issue;[142] helater asserted that the dispute over Wooten was a major reason for his firing.[145]Palin stated on July 17 that Monegan was not pressured to fire Wooten, nor dismissedfor not doing so.[138][144]Monegan said the subject of Wooten came up when he invited Palin to a birthdayparty for his cousin, state senator Lyman Hoffman, in February 2007 during thelegislative session in Juneau. "As we were walking down the stairs in the capitolbuilding she wanted to talk to me about her former brother-in-law," Monegan said. "Isaid, Maam, I need to keep you at arms length with this. I cant deal about him withyou.[146] She said, OK, thats a good idea."[142]Palin said there was "absolutely no pressure ever put on Commissioner Monegan tohire or fire anybody, at any time. I did not abuse my office powers. And I dont knowhow to be more blunt and candid and honest, but to tell you that truth. To tell youthat no pressure was ever put on anybody to fire anybody." "Never putting any
    • pressure on him," added Todd Palin.[147]On August 13 she acknowledged that a half dozen members of her administrationhad made more than two dozen calls on the matter to various state officials. "I donow have to tell Alaskans that such pressure could have been perceived to exist,although I have only now become aware of it," she said.[144][146][148] Palin said,"Many of these inquiries were completely appropriate. However, the serial nature ofthe contacts could be perceived as some kind of pressure, presumably at mydirection."[138][149]Chuck Kopp, whom Palin had appointed to replace Monegan as public safetycommissioner, received a $10,000 state severance package after he resignedfollowing just two weeks on the job. Kopp, the former Kenai chief of police, resignedJuly 25 following disclosure of a 2005 sexual harassment complaint and letter ofreprimand against him. Monegan said that he didnt get any severance package fromthe state.[138]Legislative investigationOn August 1, 2008 the Alaska Legislature hired aninvestigator, Stephen Branchflower, to review the Monegan dismissal. Legislatorsstated that Palin had the legal authority to fire Monegan, but they wanted to knowwhether her action had been motivated by anger at Monegan for not firing Wooten.[150][151] The atmosphere was bipartisan and Palin pledged to cooperate.[150][151][152] Wooten remained employed as a state trooper.[143] She placed an aideon paid leave due to a tape-recorded phone conversation that she deemed improper,in which the aide, appearing to act on her behalf, complained to a trooper thatWooten had not been fired.[153]Several weeks after the start of what the media referred to as "troopergate", Palinwas chosen as John McCains running mate.[151] On September 1, Palin asked thelegislature to drop its investigation, saying that the state Personnel Board hadjurisdiction over ethics issues.[154] The Personnel Boards three members were firstappointed by Palin’s predecessor, and Palin reappointed one member in 2008.[155]On September 19, Todd Palin and several state employees refused to honorsubpoenas, the validity of which were disputed by Talis Colberg, Palins appointee asAlaskas Attorney General.[156] On October 2, a court rejected Colbergs challenge tothe subpoenas,[157] and seven of the witnesses, not including Todd Palin, eventuallytestified.[158]Branchflower ReportOn October 10, 2008, the Alaska Legislative Council unanimouslyvoted to release, without endorsing,[159] the Branchflower Report, in whichinvestigator Stephen Branchflower found that firing Monegan "was a proper andlawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority," but that Palin abusedher power as governor and violated the states Executive Branch Ethics Act when heroffice pressured Monegan to fire Wooten.[160] The report stated that "Governor Palinknowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placedon several subordinates to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael
    • Wooten fired."[161] The report also said that Palin "permitted Todd Palin to use theGovernors office [...] to continue to contact subordinate state employees in an effortto find some way to get Trooper Wooten fired."[161][162]On October 11, Palins attorneys responded, condemning the Branchflower Report as"misleading and wrong on the law."[163] One of Palins attorneys, Thomas Van Flein,said that it was an attempt to "smear the governor by innuendo."[164] Later thatday, Palin did a conference call interview with various Alaskan reporters, where shestated, "Well, I’m very, very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing... Any hintof any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any ofthat."[165]Alaska Personnel Board investigation and reportThe bipartisan State of AlaskaPersonnel Board reviewed the matter at Palins own request.[166] On September 15,the Anchorage law firm of Clapp, Peterson, Van Flein, Tiemessen & Thorsness filedarguments of "no probable cause" with the Personnel Board on behalf of Palin.[167][168] The Personnel Board retained independent counsel Timothy Petumenos, aDemocrat, as an investigator. On October 24, Palin gave three hours of depositionswith the Personnel Board in St. Louis, Missouri.[169] On November 3, 2008, theState of Alaska Personnel Board reported that there was no probable cause to believePalin or any other state official had violated state ethical standards.[170][171][172][173][174] The report further stated that the Branchflower Report used the wrongstatute in reaching its conclusions, misconstrued the available evidence and did notconsider or obtain all of the material evidence required to properly reach findings inthe matter.[170]Job approval ratings, with comparisonsAs governor of Alaska, Palins job approvalrating ranged from a high of 93% in May 2007 to 54% in May 2009. In November2006, the month before Palin took office, Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski’s jobapproval rating was 19%.[175]Date Approval Disapproval PollsterMay 15, 2007[176] 93% Not reported Dittman ResearchMay 30, 2007[177] 89% Not reported Ivan Moore ResearchOctober 19–21, 2007[178] 83% 11% Ivan Moore ResearchApril 10, 2008[179] 73% 7% Rasmussen ReportsMay 17, 2008[180] 69% 9% Rasmussen ReportsJuly 24–25, 2008[181] 80% Not reported Hays Research GroupJuly 30, 2008[181] 64% 14% Rasmussen ReportsSeptember 20–22, 2008[182] 68% Not reported Ivan Moore ResearchOctober 7, 2008[183] 63% 37% Rasmussen ReportsMarch 24–25, 2009[184] 59.8% 34.9% Hays ResearchMay 4–5, 2009[184] 54% 41.6% Hays ResearchJune 14–18, 2009[185] 56% 35% Global Strategy GroupIn April 2009, SurveyUSA reported job approval ratings for the following U.S.
    • governors: Bob Riley (AL) 54%, Arnold Schwarzenegger (CA) 25%, Chet Culver (IA)42%, Kathleen Sebelius (KS) 46%, Steve Beshear (KY) 47%, Tim Pawlenty (MN)46%, Jay Nixon (MO) 56%, Bill Richardson (NM) 46%, David Paterson (NY) 25%, TedKulongoski (OR) 40%, Tim Kaine (VA) 50%, Christine Gregoire (WA) 40%, and JimDoyle (WI) 35%. (Polls taken April 24 – 26, 2009).[186]ResignationMain article: Resignation of Sarah PalinAn estimated 5,000 people[187] gathered at Pioneer Park in Fairbanks to watch Palincede her office to Sean Parnell.On July 3, 2009, Palin announced that she would notrun for re-election in the 2010 Alaska gubernatorial election and would resign beforethe end of July. In her announcement,[188] Palin stated that both she and the statehad been expending an "insane" amount of time and money ($2.5 million)[189] toaddress "frivolous" ethics complaints filed against her,[189][190][191][188] and thather decision not to seek reelection would make her a lame duck governor.[188] APalin aide said Palin was "no longer able to do the job she had been elected to do.Essentially, the taxpayers were paying for Sarah to go to work every day and defendherself."[192] Palin and her husband Todd had personally incurred more than$500,000 in legal fees defending against ethics charges brought against her asgovernor.[189] Palin transferred the office of governor to Sean Parnell in Fairbanks onJuly 26, 2009.[193]2008 vice-presidential campaignMain article: John McCain presidential campaign,2008See also: Republican Party (United States) vice presidential candidates, 2008Palin addresses the 2008 Republican National Convention in Saint Paul,MinnesotaSeveral conservative commentators met Palin in the summer of 2007.[194]Some of them, such as Bill Kristol, later urged McCain to pick Palin as his vicepresidential running mate, arguing that her presence on the ticket would provide aboost in enthusiasm among the Religious Right wing of the Republican party, whileher status as an unknown on the national scene would also be a positive factor.[195]On August 24, 2008 during a general strategy meeting, Steve Schmidt and a fewother senior advisers to the McCain Campaign, discussed potential vice presidentialpicks with the consensus settling around Palin. The following day, the strategistsadvised McCain of their conclusions and he personally called Palin who was at theAlaska State Fair.[196]On August 27, she visited McCains vacation home near Sedona, Arizona, where shewas offered the position of vice-presidential candidate.[197] According to JillHazelbaker, a spokeswoman for McCain, he had previously met Palin at the NationalGovernors Association meeting in Washington in February 2008 and had come away"extraordinarily impressed."[198] Palin was the only prospective running mate whohad a face-to-face interview with McCain to discuss joining the ticket that week.[199]Nonetheless, Palins selection was a surprise to many as speculation had centered on
    • other candidates, such as Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, Louisiana GovernorBobby Jindal, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator JoeLieberman of Connecticut, and former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge.[200] OnAugust 29, in Dayton, Ohio, McCain announced that he had chosen Palin as hisrunning mate.[200]Palin is the first Alaskan and the second woman to run on a major U.S. party ticket.[200]Since Palin was largely unknown outside Alaska before her selection by McCain, herpersonal life, policy positions, and political record drew intense media scrutiny.[201]On September 1, 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was pregnant andthat she would marry the father, Levi Johnston.[202] During this period, someRepublicans felt that Palin was being unfairly attacked by the media.[203] TimothyNoah of Slate magazine predicted that Palins acceptance speech would be "wildlyoverpraised" and might end speculation that she was unqualified for the job of vicepresident because the press had been beating her up for "various trivialshortcomings" and had lowered the expectations for her speech.[204] On September3, 2008, Palin delivered a 40-minute acceptance speech at the Republican NationalConvention that was well-received and watched by more than 40 million people.[205]A Rasmussen poll taken immediately after the Convention found that 51% ofAmericans believed that the media was "trying to hurt" Palin with negative coverage,and 40% believed Palin to be ready for the Presidency.[206]The Palins and McCains in Fairfax, Virginia, September 2008.During the campaign,controversy erupted over alleged differences between Palins positions as agubernatorial candidate and her position as a vice-presidential candidate. AfterMcCain announced Palin as his running mate, Newsweek and Time put Palin on theirmagazine covers,[207] as some of the media alleged that McCains campaign wasrestricting press access to Palin by allowing only three one-on-one interviews and nopress conferences with her.[208] Palins first major interview, with Charles Gibson ofABC News, met with mixed reviews.[209] Her interview five days later with FoxNews Sean Hannity went more smoothly and focused on many of the same questionsfrom Gibsons interview.[210] Palins performance in her third interview, with KatieCouric of CBS News, was widely criticized; her poll numbers declined, Republicansexpressed concern that she was becoming a political liability, and some conservativecommentators called for Palin to resign from the Presidential ticket.[211][212] Otherconservatives remained ardent in their support for Palin, accusing the columnists ofelitism.[213] Following this interview, some Republicans, including Mitt Romney andBill Kristol, questioned the McCain campaigns strategy of sheltering Palin fromunscripted encounters with the press.[214]Palin reportedly prepared intensively for the October 2 vice-presidential debate withDemocratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden at Washington University in St. Louis.Some Republicans suggested that Palins performance in the interviews would
    • improve public perceptions of her debate performance by lowering expectations.[211][215][216] Polling from CNN, Fox and CBS found that while Palin exceeded mostvoters expectations, they felt that Biden had won the debate.[217][218]Upon returning to the campaign trail after her debate preparation, Palin stepped upher attacks on the Democratic candidate for President, Illinois Senator BarackObama. At a fundraising event, Palin explained her new aggressiveness, saying,"There does come a time when you have to take the gloves off and that time is rightnow."[219]Palin appeared on Saturday Night Lives "Weekend Update" segment on October 18.Prior to her appearance, she had been parodied several times by Tina Fey, who wasnoted for her physical resemblance to the candidate.[220] In the weeks leading up tothe election, Palin was also the subject of amateur parodies posted on YouTube.[221]Controversy arose after it was reported that the Republican National Committee(RNC) spent $150,000 of campaign contributions on clothing, hair styling, andmakeup for Palin and her family in September 2008. Campaign spokespersons statedthe clothing would be going to charity after the election.[222] Palin and some mediaoutlets blamed gender bias for the controversy.[223][224] At the end of thecampaign, Palin returned the clothes to the RNC.[225]The election took place on November 4, and Obama was projected as the winner at11:00 PM EST.[226] In his concession speech McCain thanked Palin, calling her "oneof the best campaigners Ive ever seen, and an impressive new voice in our party forreform and the principles that have always been our greatest strength."[226] Whileaides were preparing the teleprompter for McCains speech, they found a concessionspeech written for Palin by George W. Bush speechwriter Matthew Scully. Twomembers of McCains staff, Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter, told Palin that there wasno tradition of Election Night speeches by running mates, and that she would not bespeaking. Palin appealed to McCain, who agreed with his staff.[227]After the 2008 electionRallying with Saxby Chambliss in Savannah, Georgia, December 2008Palin was thefirst guest on commentator Glenn Becks Fox News television show on January 19,2009, commenting on Barack Obama that he would be her president and that shewould assist in any way to bring progress to the nation without abandoning herconservative views.[228]On January 27, 2009, Palin formed the political action committee, SarahPAC.[229]The organization, which describes itself as an advocate of energy independence,[230]supports candidates for federal and state office.[231] Following her resignation asGovernor, Palin announced her intention to campaign "on behalf of candidates whobelieve in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation."[232] It wasreported that SarahPAC had raised nearly $1,000,000.[233] A legal defense fund wasset up to help Palin challenge ethics complaints, and it had collected approximately
    • $250,000 by mid-July 2009.[233][234] In June 2010, Palins defense fund was ruledillegal and will have to pay back $386,856 it collected in donations because it usedPalins position as governor to raise money for her personal gain. Palin subsequentlyset up a new defense fund.[235]In March 2010, Palin started a show to be aired on TLC called Sarah Palins Alaska.[236] The show was produced by Mark Bennett.[237] Palin also has secured asegment on Fox News.[237] Two guests that she was shown to have interviewedclaimed to have never met her. Guests LL Cool J and Toby Keith stated that footageshown on the segment was actually taken from another interview with someone else,but was used in Palins segment.[238]On December 8, 2010, it was reported that SarahPAC and Palins personal credit cardinformation were compromised through cyber attacks. Palins team believed theattack was executed by Anonymous during Operation Payback.[239] The report wasmet with skepticism in the blogosphere.[240] Palins email had been hacked oncebefore in 2008.[241]Going Rogue and America by HeartMain article: Going Rogue: An American LifeIn November 2009, Palin released her memoir, Going Rogue: An American Life, inwhich she details her private and political career, including her resignation asGovernor of Alaska. Palin said she took the title from the phrase gone rogue used byMcCain staffers to describe her behavior when she spoke her mind on the issuesduring the campaign.[242] The subtitle, "An American Life", mirrors the title ofPresident Ronald Reagans 1990 autobiography.[243] Less than two weeks after itsrelease, sales of the book exceeded the one million mark, with 300,000 copies soldthe first day. Its bestseller rankings were comparable to memoirs by Bill Clinton,Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.[244][245][246]Palin traveled to 11 states in a bus, with her family accompanying her, to promote thebook. She made a number of media appearances as well, including a widelypublicized interview on November 16, 2009 with Oprah Winfrey.[247] In November2010 HarperCollins released Palins second book, titled America by Heart: Reflectionson Family, Faith, and Flag.[18][248][249] The book contains excerpts from Palinsfavorite speeches, sermons and literature as well as portraits of people Palin admires,including some she met in rural America on her first book tour.[18]Palin on the campaign trail in 2008Tea Party MovementOn February 6, 2010, Palinappeared as the keynote speaker at the inaugural Tea Party convention in Nashville,Tennessee. Palin said the Tea Party movement is "the future of politics inAmerica."[250] She criticized Obama for rising deficits, and for "apologizing forAmerica” in speeches in other countries. Palin said Obama was weak on the war onterror for allowing the so-called Christmas bomber to board a plane headed for theUnited States.[251] Palin’s speaking fee was reported to be $100,000, which some inthe Tea Party movement criticized as being too high for fiscal conservatives to pay.
    • [citation needed] Judson Phillips, the founder of Tea Party Nation, the socialnetworking site that sponsored the convention, did not confirm the amount paid toPalin saying he was contractually obligated not to speak about it."Pink Elephant" Movement and 2010 endorsementsIn the middle of 2010, Palinflagged the launch of a new "Pink Elephant Movement."[252] She set aboutendorsing a number of female GOP candidates.[253] Her endorsement helpedGeorgia Gubernatorial candidate Karen Handel to take the lead in the campaign forthe Republican nomination,[254] though ultimately Handel lost the primary. Palin hasendorsed several female candidates nationally. Ryan Rudominer, a spokesman for theHouse Democratic campaign operation has called her involvement in various U.S.House campaigns a "great thing across the board".[255] She spoke at a May 2010fundraiser for the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life political advocacy group andpolitical action committee that supports pro-life women in politics, in which shecoined the term "mama grizzly".[256][257]In the months ahead of the November 2010 elections, Palin selectively endorsedRepublican candidates, and was a significant fundraising asset to those shecampaigned for during the primary season.[258] According to Politico, Palins criteriafor endorsing candidates was whether they had the support of the Tea Partymovement and the support of the Susan B. Anthony List.[259] In terms of success,Palin was 7-2 for Senate endorsements; 7-6 for House endorsements; and 6-3 inendorsements of gubernatorial candidates[260] Palins endorsement of Joe Miller inthe August 24 Alaska primary election for U.S. Senator was identified as a possiblepivotal moment in Millers upset of the incumbent Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski.[261][262] According to Daily Beast reporter Shushannah Walshe, ChristineODonnells prospects of upsetting establishment Republican candidate Mike Castle"changed overnight" due to Palins endorsement. ODonnell defeated Castle in theSeptember 14 primary for Joe Bidens former Senate seat in Delaware.[263] HerODonnell endorsement further increased tensions between Palin and the Republicanestablishment: leading conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer describedthe endorsement as "reckless and irresponsible";[264] party strategist Karl Roveargued that her endorsement may have cost the GOP the Delaware Senate seat;[265] and commentators including Politicos Ben Smith posited that Palins support ofODonnell contributed to dashing Republican hopes of regaining control of the U.S.Senate.[266] Palins influence over the primaries nonetheless further increasedspeculation that she would seek to be the partys nominee for President in 2012,[267] with political pundits Paul Mirengoff, David Frum, and Jonathan Chaitidentifying Palin as the front-runner.[268][269][270]Possible 2012 presidential campaignPalins high profile in the 2008 presidentialcampaign fueled speculation that she will run for the Republican presidentialnomination in 2012, and beginning in November 2008, there was an active "DraftPalin" movement.[271] On February 6, 2010, when Fox News asked her if she wouldbe running for president in 2012, she replied, "I would be willing to if I believe thatits right for the country."[272] She added, "I wont close the door that perhaps could
    • be open for me in the future."[273]In November 2010, Palin confirmed that she was considering running for thePresidency, and was "having that discussion with my family". She stated she realisedher level of experience could cause problems with winning the nomination, andcriticized the "lamestream media" for focusing attention on her personal life.[274]Personal lifePalin family members at the announcement of her vice-presidential selection, August29, 2008. From left to right: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol and Trig.Palin describesherself as a "hockey mom". The Palins have five children: sons Track (b. 1989)[50]and Trig Paxson Van (b. 2008), and daughters Bristol Sheeran Marie[275] (b. 1990),Willow (b. 1994), and Piper (b. 2001).[4][276] Track enlisted in the U.S. Army onSeptember 11, 2007,[277] and was subsequently assigned to an infantry brigade. Heand his unit deployed to Iraq in September 2008 for 12 months.[278] Palinsyoungest child, Trig, was prenatally diagnosed with Down syndrome.[279] Palin hasone grandchild, a boy named Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston, who was born to hereldest daughter Bristol, in 2008.[280] Her husband Todd worked for the British oilcompany BP as an oil-field production operator, retiring in 2009, and owns acommercial fishing business.[48][281]Palin was born into a Roman Catholic family.[9] Later, her family joined the WasillaAssembly of God, a Pentecostal church,[282] which she attended until 2002. Palinthen switched to the Wasilla Bible Church because, she said, she preferred thechildrens ministries offered there.[283] When in Juneau, she attends the JuneauChristian Center.[284] Palin described herself in an interview as a "Bible-believingChristian."[9] After the Republican National Convention, a spokesperson for theMcCain campaign told CNN that Palin "doesnt consider herself Pentecostal" and has"deep religious convictions."[285]Political positionsMain article: Political positions of Sarah PalinPalin has been a registered Republican since 1982.[286]Palin opposed the 2010 health care reform package, saying it would lead to rationingof health care by a bureaucracy, which she described using the term "death panels".This legislation is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by theHealth Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.[287] Palin characterizes theact as an "unfunded mandate", and supports defunding it.[288] Palin supports repealof portions of the act.[289]Palin is a strong supporter of Israel.[290][291] Referring to Irans threat to Israel,Palin said Obama would be reelected if "he played the war card. Say he decided todeclare war on Iran or decided really come out and do whatever he could to supportIsrael, which I would like him to do."[292]Palin opposes same-sex marriage,[293] abortion including in cases of rape andincest, and embryonic stem cell research.[294] She supports capital punishment,[295] and parental consent for female minors seeking an abortion,[296] andsupports creationism being taught as an option in public schools.[297]
    • Palin supports sex education in public schools that encourage abstinence along withcontraception.[298]A Life Member of the National Rifle Association (NRA), Palin interprets the SecondAmendment as including the right to handgun possession, and opposes bans onsemi-automatic assault weapons.[299] and supports gun safety education for youth.[300]Palin supports off-shore drilling, and land-based drilling in the Arctic National WildlifeRefuge.[101][301] When commenting on the Gulf Coast oil disaster Palin said, "Irepeat the slogan drill here, drill now."[302] She said, "I want our country to be ableto trust the oil industry."[303] Palin asked supporters to read an article by ThomasSowell which criticized Obama for having BP pay to an escrow fund.[304]Palin has expressed skepticism about the causes of global warming,[305] but agreesthat "mans activities certainly can be contributing to the issue" and that actionshould be taken.[306] She is opposed to cap-and-trade proposals, such as theAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill still pending in the Senate.[307] Palinhas acknowledged that "Simply waiting for low-carbon-emitting renewable capacity tobe large enough will mean that it will be too late to meet the mitigation goals..thatwill be required [for carbon dioxide] under most credible climate-changemodels."[308]On foreign policy, Palin supported the Bush Administrations policies in Iraq, but isconcerned that "dependence on foreign energy" may be obstructing efforts to "havean exit plan in place".[309][310] Palin supports preemptive military action in the faceof an imminent threat, and supports U.S. military operations in Pakistan. Palinsupports NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia,[311] and affirms that if Russiainvaded a NATO member, the United States should meet its treaty obligations.[312]On foreign policy, Palin supported the surge strategy in Iraq, the use of additionalground forces in Afghanistan, and, in general, maintaining a strong defensive postureby increasing the defense budget. She believes Islam and democracy can co-exist.She supports strengthening Americas alliance with Japan. She supports the de-nuclearization of North Korea. She supports free trade and wants to work with Chinato reduce American debt and improve the human rights and political freedom of itscitizens.[313]Public imageMain article: Public image of Sarah PalinPrior to the Republican National Convention, a Gallup poll found that most voterswere unfamiliar with Sarah Palin. During her campaign to become vice president,39% said Palin was ready to serve as president if needed, 33% said Palin was not,and 29% had no opinion. This was "the lowest vote of confidence in a running matesince the elder George Bush chose then-Indiana senator Dan Quayle to join his ticketin 1988."[314] Following the Convention, her image came under close mediascrutiny,[201][315] particularly with regard to her religious perspective on public life,her socially conservative views, and her perceived lack of experience. Palinsexperience in foreign and domestic politics came under criticism among conservativesas well as liberals following her nomination.[316][317][318][319] At the same time,Palin became more popular than John McCain among Republicans.[206]One month after McCain announced Palin as his running mate, she was viewed both
    • more favorably and unfavorably among voters than her opponent, Delaware Senator Joe Biden.[320] A plurality of the television audience rated Bidens performance higher at the 2008 vice-presidential debate.[320][321] Media outlets repeated Palins statement that she "stood up to Big Oil" when she resigned after 11 months as the head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, due to abuses she witnessed involving other Republican commissioners and their ties to energy companies and energy lobbyists, and again when she raised taxes on oil companies as governor.[181][322] In turn, others have said that Palin is a "friend of Big Oil" due to her advocacy of oil exploration and development including drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the de-listing of the polar bear as an endangered species.[181][322] The National Organization for Women did not endorse McCain/Palin, instead endorsing Barack Obama.[316][323] Palin was selected as one of America’s "Top 10 Most Fascinating People" of 2008 for a Barbara Walters ABC special on December 4, 2008.[324] In April 2010, Sarah Palin was selected as one of the 100 Worlds Most Influential People by TIME Magazine. In the wake of the January 8th, 2011 shooting of Rep. Giffords, Palin faced criticism for her SarahPAC websites inclusion of a graphic that included a crosshair over Giffordss district. Palin responded to the criticism of the graphic, saying that "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them," controversially equating the accusations of her role in the shooting to a "blood libel". Following her response, an ABC News-Washington Post poll found that 46% of respondents viewed Palins actions after the shooting unfavorably, while 30% approved and 24% had no opinion.CambodiaViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbyCambodia
    • 01-20-2011, #409:48AM “Breezy Bluefin” Refreshing as the Tropical Trade winds”...xoxooxpoohbearJunior (Breezy Bluefin)Member 1 ½ oz. “White Rum”JoinDate: 3 oz. Guava Juice/NectarSep2010 3oz. PineappleLocation: 3oz. Orange JuiceHoustonPosts: 7 1 ½ oz. “Dark Rum” 1/3 oz. or splash of “Gin” Fill a “Hurricane glass with Ice. Add “White Rum” and the Juices to a Shaker with Ice plus add the 1/3 oz. or splash of “Gin” into the Glass. Shake well contents in the Shaker, strain into the “Hurricane glass. Garnish with a Pineapple…………………..xoxoox......poohbear
    • ViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbypoohbear 01-20-2011, #501:01PM Smoked King Crab Legs and Lobster Tails".........xoxooxreflectJuniorMember IngredientsJoin Apple or alder wood chunksDate:Sep 1 cup butter or margarine, melted2010 1/4 cup fresh lemon juiceLocation 1 tablespoon minced fresh parsley:houston 1/2 teaspoon grated lemon rind Pinch saltPosts: 5 5 pounds frozen king crab legs, thawed 4 frozen lobster tails, thawed (about 2 pounds) Preparation Soak wood chunks in water to cover at least 30 minutes. Prepare charcoal fire in smoker; let burn 15 to 20 minutes. Drain chips, and place on coals. Place water pan in smoker; add water to fill line. Stir together butter and next 4 ingredients. Divide lemon-butter mixture in half. Crack crab legs, and split lobster tails. Brush lobster and crab with half of mixture; set aside remaining mixture. Coat rack with cooking spray; place in smoker. Arrange crab legs and lobster tails on rack; cover with grill lid. Smoke crab about 20 minutes and lobster about 45 minutes
    • to 1 hour or until flesh is white and firm.......reflectViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbyreflect 01-24-2011 #6, 03:15PMblu Smoking Hot of the Press 2011 Cmdr. Bluefin up date>....xoxox"efinlch2Senior Cmdr. BluefinMember I Have to began my 2011 “Fucked up State of the Union Address up-date”...JoinDate:Aug By calling out a station for the “Hell of it” Identification Break” ...2010Location:Houston And Help pay some (Mother Fucking)…Got dam it” Backpage.com piling the fuck upPosts: bills around here “....101
    • And maybe get a volume on this “Motherfucking cheap ass “wire” broke dick thingy”……………….You’re on the backpage.com “Legal Forum”….&… “Live” with Louis Charles Hamilton II(Cmdr. Bluefin)….Folks….Please don’t be too afraid of what you may “see, hear orread”……………..xoxoxox!(Just Fucking Run)….. ha, ha,…….or not….It’s your own Bleeding Ear’s....The Grand Tour…!Includes “Fresh -n-Legal” “Court Room Drama updates…Numerous “Sherlock Holmes Stories”and Live Mysteries special famous “Fuck heads” crash in guests’ appearance beingposted as they slit their very own Greedy fucking throats….All being solved in a very professional “Sherlock Holmes” big top- scary explosiveshow....Bring a whole different perspective in a proper “New Media Broadcast”...
    • ……full of Cmdr. Bluefin Special Hot Plate Sizzles & Fizzle’s with Old and New Politicalcriminal posted for line ups…..Hell I will even “Dig up the “Motherfucking” Stale Ass…Deep Cold Grave…..to bring you the “Super Bowl” blow out of wrap this motherfucker up with “Fizzledead coverage this 2011 special prime time opportunity in your fucking home ....Remember it is only Pre/pay Coverage…..for you small party,.....company showcase,.......school capabilities….....Just pay your Dumb Dam Internet Bill…ya “Silly...…a cost effective, hassle-free ......and instantly gratifying incentive that your "Nosy Ass" will trulyLove………………Cmdr. Bluefin USN.....................
    • bluefinlch2ViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbybluefinlch2 01-25-2011, #705:00PMblue Amend 00808 on "Sarah Palin" and Vice President "Dick Cheney"..Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.finlch2Senior 446.Member The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) assert respectfully before the Honorable Court that the Defendants (The United States of America) Politicians consistently use Ear Marks and Pork waisting the Defendants and Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (The United State ofJoinDate: America) taxpayers money on Pet Projects.Aug2010 Many of which are questionable as to the benefit to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)Location (Negro) African-Americans currently still declared “Second Class Citizens.:Houston Furthermore, Sarah Palin the Defendants (The United States of America) state ofPosts: Alaskas former “Governor” and Former Republican Vice-presidential Candidate,101 As Governor, Sarah Palin opted to use the $200 million that Congress had originally set aside (Ear marked) for the bridge project linking the town of Ketchikan (population 7,500) with an airport on sparsely populated Gravina island and used the Pork Funds for other transportation projects.
    • On or about 2009 Sarah Palin was allegedly Embezzling from the Wasillia SportsComplex Project while she was the Defendants (The United States) Mayor of thetown of Wasilla, Alaska in 2002.The $12million plus project ended up in the hands of contractors who were friends offriends of Sarah Palin.Secondly, at around the same time the sports complex was being built, so was SarahPalin’s new house.It is alleged that the materials in Sarah Palins new house are the exact samematerials used in the sports complexCurrently Sarah Palin is promoting her political agenda, which is indicative of anagenda contrary to the interests of the Plaintiff and Plaintiffs (Negro) Black African-American which is very hostile and extreme conservative in natureFurthermore the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) respectfully assert before the HonorableCourt (Palin) among other in this (Tea Party) promoting the (White) Supremacistinterests,In direct collusion with the legacy of the Defendant (The United States of America)system of chattel free slave labor.To include but not limited to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) assert (Palin) among othersin this (Tea Party) furtherance’s in a Direct collusion scheme of things with the legacyof Co-Defendant herein (President Andrew Johnson ) system of chattel free slavelaborWith the Co-Defendant (President Andrew Johnson) added bonus win “by any meansnecessary “hostile” “Ku Klux Klan”All of which is indicative of an agenda contrary to the full interests, rights, dignity,freedom, and equal protection under the law for the Plaintiff and Plaintiffs (Negro)Black African-American within all of the Defendants herein (The United States ofAmerica) territory.The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will further respectfully show before the “HonorableUnited States Federal Court” the Following current results of the “Agenda Activities”of Sarah Palin and Her political (Tea Party) caused in 2011 as following:1. Jared Loughner attempted assassination of “Congress-Women” “Gabrielle Gifford”ended in fatal results due in large parts to attacks made upon (Gifford) votes forHuman dignity to include the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) National Interest:
    • A. Christina Taylor Green, age 9 was wheeled from a Church in a “Child –Size” Coffinto the “Mournful strains of bagpipes.B. United States Federal Justice “John Roll” also is being “Mournful” by the UnitedStates of America “in this fall-out shooting along withC. Dorothy Morris, 76,D. Phyllis Schneck, 79E. Dorwin Stoddard, 76F. Gabe Zimmerman, 30;G. Wounded are “Pam Simon”H. And “Rep. Gabrielle Giffords”.All of which Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully assert before the above-entitledHonorable U.S. District Court being executed under a “Killer Hostile Fraction Style”regardless of any “mental issues” being current in claims,And in a “Direct Attack” for the “Special Efforts of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (Amongothers)in (Gifford’s) Biblical movement(s) among others towards a “Real Re-Construction ofthe Defendant(s) (The United States of America) “New World”for the “full constitutional benefits to include the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro)African American.488.The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will respectfully show the Honorable Court that all of thefollow happened during the Defendants (The United States of America) PresidentGeorge W. Bush and Vice-President Cheneys AdministrationFurtherance’s Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully Assert all of which was veryindicative in allForms, fashions, instruments, documentations, presentations against the bestinterest of the Plaintiff and all Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black African-Americans herein:a. Presidential Signing Statements a Policy that Institutes Rule by Decree
    • b. No-Bid Domestic Soil Detention Camps Built by Halliburtonc. Conspiring to establish permanent colonial control over 70% of Iraqs oild. Selling Control Operations of 6 U.S. ports to the Dubai Port despite Objectionsfrom Congress and the Public namely Plaintiff and Plaintiffse. the Cost of a "Medicaid Reform" (Original Knight-Ridder Article in .DOC Format)f. Tax Cuts Benefit Rich & Wealthy Mostg. Bush Defends Most Corrupt Congressman, Tom Delay.h. Undermining and Attempting to Privatize Social Security.I. Worst Jobs Creation Record Under Any Presidentj. 2005 Energy Bill Eviscerates Environmental Protections & Gives Tax Breaks to BigOil Companies.k. Bush Rejects One-Time Windfall Tax on Oil Industry.l. Deregulation of FCC to Benefit Wealthy Via Appointment of Michael Powellm. Cheney & Bush Declare Dictatorial Powers Expansions of Martial Law, Section1076: Bush as Dictatorn. Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) Knowingly Over-Charging Tax Payers, No SpendingLimits in Iraqo. Contractor Swindlingp. Bush’s Repeated Attempts to Cripple Children’s Health careq. “Massive Failure” in Government Accountability for Billions Spent and WeaponsLostr. KBR Contractors Indicted for War Profiteerings. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Resigns in Disgrace But Not BeforeGutting Departmentt. KBR Using Cayman Islands as Tax Shelter to Avoid Paying Medicare, SocialSecurity and Other Taxes
    • u. Bush Purposefully Leaving FEC Unfilled to Manipulate Campaign FinanceEnforcement Agencyv. Private Contractors Ignore Spending Rules to the Tune of $8.2 Billionw. Bush Financier Gets $80-Million Pentagon Contract despite Being an FBI Fugitivew. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Gives $500k to Low-RankingGolfing Group Chaired by Bush Sr.To include but not limited to the “Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)” will assert andunproblematic, at ease, stress-free & simply show before the Honorable Court that“Vice-President Dick Cheney”:1. On or about a day on the heels of the January 8 shooting spree in Tucson, Ariz.,which left six dead and 14 wounded as described in the Amend Complaint of thePlaintiff and Plaintiff(s).2. Former Vice – President “Dick Cheney” attempted with inflicting terror among thePlaintiff and Plaintiff(s) and others by usage of a device (IED) for bombing in apremeditated scheme of things for purpose to inflict a state of terror within theUnited States of America against the current Presidential Administration for political,personal and vindictive reasoning3. (Dick) collectively with hidden confederates all tranquil with full intent on having a“very lethal”, full impact & potential intent to inflict “multiple innocent casualties. Bysuch (IED) bomb."4. To cause such casualties Among the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black AfricanAmerican to include but not limited to (among many others) non-race different of(Negro) Black African Americans others5. All whom being innocent in nature and present during the Martin Luther King Dayparade in Spokane, Wash. Within the Defendant (The United States of America) onJanuary 17, 20116. For a “Mad Man Mastermind Killer design” by Former Vice President Dick Cheneyestablishment in collision, control of the “Oval Office” of the Defendants (The UnitedStates of America) for profit(s), and political gain(Among other things) reasoning tomaintain continue wrongful, legal control, pattern and practices design in seriousstraightforward continue exploits over the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) BlackAfrican American future life, duration, dignity, will, welfare, well being and respect asdescribed herein the “Amend Complaint” of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)7. For collective purpose Former Vice President Dick Cheney illegal hidden conspirer& Explosive agenda in attempt at “Civil War” being a device of re-establishments
    • control of the “Oval Office” of the Defendants (The United States of America) as thepast “legacy has dictated this patter and practices.8. Former Vice President Dick Cheney “Hostile” institution in maintaining Plaintiff andPlaintiff(s) be said described device herein for furtherance’s continue controllingstate of purgatory poverty, control of modern enforcement of “Slavery” upon thePlaintiff and Plaintiff(s) throughout past (Negro) Black African American descendantsdifficult history9. To the Present date Former Vice – President “Dick Cheney” attempted to achievethe same with usage of mental terror, and by usage of a explosive device (IED)bombing, in a premeditated scheme of things, for purpose to inflict a state of terror,within the United States of America to cause among other thing “Civil War” againstthe Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) life, rights, will, and peace and dignity10. Which such “Civil War” having already been inflicted enough throughout the pastof the Defendants herein (The United States of America) “New Complicated World”.11. Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully assert before the Honorable Court thatFormer Vice President “Dick Cheney” further attempt to re-engage the Defendants(The United States of America) into another state of being at “Civil War” in a criminal(Explosive) style engagement(s) for a anxious demand in light of (Dick Cheney)current “Health reasoning and Halliburton current civil (RICO) criminal penalties.12. All wrongfully in criminal action(s) of Former Vice-President Dick Cheney, thusbeing done and directed at the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (LIVES)… (Amongothers)...For both “personal, vindictive & political” purpose.13. To include as device of “future advantage” of (RNC) Republican NationalConvention assets for smear during the 2012 Presidential Election Campaignsagainst the current (Obama) Administration.14. And using by further design against (Sarah Palin) Presidential “Tea Party” as theinflicting explosive “escape-goat/cow” party doing such Criminal “Explosive” (RICO)Actions.15. Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will show respectfully show the Honorable Court FormerVice – President “Dick Cheney” On or about Dec. 29, 2009 attempted bombing of aninternational passenger flight from Netherlands to United States,16. Doing the same pattern and practices in the recent past thus putting the Plaintiffand Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Blacks African American in the same criminal (RICO) pawnposition as described in paragraph (488) (2), and (3) above with the unexpectedpossible loss of “Random Innocent Physical harm and Loss of Life”17. For a continue maintaining “White Supremacy Agenda” already established in the
    • Defendants (The United States of America) as (Man Man Mastermind Bomber Dick Cheney) continue being false in bogus apply pressure in claiming the Defendants (The United States of America) is un-safe by the current undersign Presidential (Obama) Administration while (Dick) engage his collective criminal intent on putting the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black African Americans (among others) lives at continue possible faith in a “Mental” state of terror of (Dick), 18. To include but not limited to Defendants (The United States of America) physical human occupants regardless of (“National origin”) suffer real-physical permanent injury(s), and “Physical losses of life due to “Future Deaths” through Continue Bombing (among others) “Hostile (RICO) Criminal Civil War Type-Killer Tactic(s)”.bluefinlch2ViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbybluefinlch2 01-26-2011, #803:49PM Cmdr. Bluefin To “Houston” Scrooge Attorney: Harry C. Arthur et al…xoxoxbluefinlch2Senior To “Houston” Scrooge Attorney: Harry C. Arthur et al…xoxoxMember What’s up Scrooge and the “Entire” “Hole in the Wall gang”……..A/k/a Law Office(s) of Harry C. Arthur.JoinDate:
    • Aug Thought a Brother checks in on ya all & especially you “Scrooge Attorney” and see2010 how your “Stinky Shit pumping” ticker of a fucked up Heart...Location:Houston is (Collectively) holding out……..too, Da”…….xoxoxoxPosts:101 “Did not want ya thinking I forgot my…..as my man say (mathematicals)………. As “Clint Eastwood” said in a Few Dollars More ……..ha, ha, Can’t blame a (Nigger) for checking in on his $16.2 Million Dollars portfolio’” Civil Suit” investment….. You good “Church Stealing Bastard”……. Hell “Scrooge dudes your worthless ass “Attorney Law Degree” and the whole entire fucked up “Hole in the Wall Gang” Attorneys Laws Degrees is actually fucking having appeal, merit, attraction, value, and some big 2011 “Significance…. “especially in Free Internet Advertisement(s)……… Have ya fucking check on “Google.com: (Dumb) ass….. Here is a preview for ya fucked up “Good Church stealing ass”………..xoxooxo everything from ("Scrooge Clocks to gourmet “Christmas baskets”) 1. Scrooge clocks - Home “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Launches, scrooge and the inflatable bath chair - enter the void. ... studentscornerpretoria.com/loc-scrooge-clocks.html - Cached 1. Welsh scrooge - a welsh born icon: a christmas carol; Mrs scrooge - blackwell bookshop online; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ... premier-lofts.com/ozu-welsh-scrooge.html - Cached ►
    • 2. Jet scrooge listen - ALM Fjármál - Heim / Homeholiday special with ebeneezer scrooge and christopher walken ... auburn “scroogeattorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million b-52 s christmas music ...fjarmalaradgjof.com/io-jet-scrooge-listen.html - Iceland - Cached3. “Scrooge Attorney” Harry C. Arthur Esq.et al (16.2) Million ...Scrooge Attorney” Harry C. Arthur Esq.et al (16.2) Million Dollars Settlement Offer"Legal Advice.forums.backpage.com/showthread.php?t=92554 - Cached4. Keeping christmas scrooge - Adventist City Missions“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million: Storing christmas scrooge• christmas punch with champagne • christmas crafts painting ...adventistcitymissions.org/jz/uja-keeping-christmas-scrooge.html - Cached5. Outline scrooge -“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. how to draw unclescrooge mcduck | video « wonder how to. Compare scrooge in toys at shop.com ...maxgallico.com/th-outline-scrooge.html - Cached6. Scrooge antiques - Welcome To Eye of the Islandslighst for christmas village houses; Beswick charactor scrooge toby jug no.372 |www.antiques.co.uk |; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) ...eyeoftheislands.com/sy-scrooge-antiques.html - Cached7. Scrooge riddles - Add-A-Cart CatalogThestreet.com news - save like scrooge as holidays approach ... scrooge clues -;“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...youthenatia.com/jr-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached1. Bloom county scrooge - Therapy Care Plus - Web Based Practice ...“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. The bloom county library,volume one: 1980-1982 - buy cheap books ...therapycareplus.com/zw-bloom-county-scrooge.html - Cached1. Topper from scrooge young - Institute of Art and LawFlipkart book list: from scrooge wore spurs to scrumpy ... “scrooge attorney” harryc. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...ial.uk.com/adv-topper-from-scrooge-young.html - Cached1. Scrooge undigested lettuce - Index of /“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. christmas parade videos •for christians & messianic jews - energy freedom - the next ...eportal.me/ya-scrooge-undigested-lettuce.htm - Cached1. Scrooge undigested peas - Opportunity making money from home with ...“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; Dining with scrooge bygary north. white christmas screen shots. Christmas carol, a (1938) ...cashfornewbiesnow.com/zu-scrooge-undigested-peas.html - Cached2. Boys scrooge jokes - Pete von Haasl - Homechristmas word find; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; afterchristmas sale on artifical trees Christmas carol ebenezer scrooge ...petevonhaasl.com/vu-boys-scrooge-jokes.html - Cached1. Scrooge cheats -“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Scrooge cheats christmas
    • carol • new funny scrooge pic! « maymay453′s club penguin cheats! ...mstranspo.com/cfo-scrooge-cheats.html - Cached2. Ocean scrooge me - Homegifts under 50 - picvi videos: “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2)million: A christmas carol by charles dickens. story of scrooge ghost ...paroimia.com/po-ocean-scrooge-me.html - Cached3. Sauce scrooge - Home PageIm no scrooge, but - the dis discussion forums - disboards.com. “scrooge attorney”harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. merry christmas darling 2 22 ...healthandhappinesscoaching.com/dea-sauce-scrooge.html - Cached1. Ship sewing scrooge - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. steampunk coat dr jekyllmr hyde costume sewing by peoplepackages. Pen to paper: september 2009 ...bluekelpie.com/rpu-ship-sewing-scrooge.html - Cached►2. They called her scrooge - Thingz4all - a little something 4 everyone“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million • the world of wealth:channeling scrooge: evicting tenants during. merry christmas screensavers ...thingz4all.com/ol/fw-they-called-her-scrooge.html - Cached3. Scrooge of outline - rantomonline - Home“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million Scrooge plot outlineScrooge of map. Summary of a christmas carol: synopsis charles dickens ...rantomonline.com/ei-scrooge-of-outline.html - Cached4. Antique welsh scrooge - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Ebenezer scroogechristmas - 403 forbidden. Tips for winter driving - by tom welsh - helium ...goldcoastmarinegroup.com/lud-antique-welsh-scrooge.html - Cached1. Scrooge riddles - Family“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Babys first scrooge -brasserie tenafly restaurant; 72 miles from the sea: scrooge and marley ...beausoleil.cc/pry-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached2. Metal pyramids scrooge - kansascitynotaryagent.com/index.html“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. newgrounds search:"metal gear awesome". cheap christmas paperware ...gethomerefinancemortgage.com/jy-metal-pyramids-scrooge.html - Cached3. Letters: Tigers tale revisited | Viewpoints, Outlook | Chron.com ...Dec 4, 2009 ... Regarding “He aims to turn off The Beacon; Attorney claimshomeless ... that Ebenezer Scrooge walks among us, disguised as Harry C. Arthur, ...http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...k/6754113.html - Cached4. Marine sewing scrooge - Christopher-M HomeDressmaker deluxe sewing machine - guelph best deal. akulapera teams are alsoconducting marine. “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...christopher-m.com/oc-marine-sewing-scrooge.html - Cached5. Scrooge in porter - Math Mom Online - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Take your carol | thehouse next door. scrooge takes center stage for the holidays | deseret ...
    • mathmomonline.com/mek-scrooge-in-porter.html - Cached1. Scrooge riddles - James Caraway Christian Academy“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Answers for christmasriddles - home. family guy ghost of christmas future - hallowed grounds a ...jccachickasha.org/ff-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached2. Smelt scrooge - Samsara Solutions LLC“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; A christmas carol, bycharles dickens; stave 3: the second of the; Charles dickens a christmas ...samsarasol.com/per-smelt-scrooge.html - Cached3. Spite scrooge stave - hendrycorporation.com - Our Clients“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million A christmas carol-stave 3part 3; ebenezer scrooge : scrooge and the english language ...hendrycorporation.com/xoi-spite-scrooge-stave.html - Cached4. Ancient scrooge -Nbcindia.com: uncle scrooge #379 by carl banks,paul halas,gorm; “scroogeattorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; what christmas carol could come ...forevermoers.com/eu-ancient-scrooge.html - Cached5. Noises scrooge -doctor who visits scrooge in christmas special | airlockalpha.com; “scroogeattorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; Scrooge | slots | roxy ...ambergold-ocean.com/tic-noises-scrooge.html - Cached6. Fruit scrooge - Welcome to Palmer Ohana“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. gourmet christmasbaskets. the full story of scrooge • animated christmas objects ...palmerohana.com/wp-fruit-scrooge.html - CachedWell you all should be extra “Shity Scared” right about now,,,,seeing on how’s that “Mean Old Hang em High” Honorable Texas Federal Judge…. hasah been burning the “Mid Night Oil’s….Benz Eating lots of “Wisconsin” prime cut (USDA) cheddar cheese sandwiches……Plenty of Cold Milk’s –n-thingswith them macadamia nuts cookies……
    • and the Honorable Court I heard…..order up some “Chilly-fries sausage Burgers”...with extra “Red Hot sauce” for the “Mean AN Extra Mean case of “Heart Burns”....While Figuring on how’s to re-discovering a new “Twang” to the meaning of hang ya(Scrooge) Crooked Ass extra high…………………Sorry my bad “Scrooge” et al, I been a tad bit busy with the “Big Time TexasHurricane Umberto Krooked Attorney Civil Action….Staring none other than… (Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J. D. Esq.) and his “pack of“Mad Dogs” of Clients),In my Sherlock Holmes Mystery Case of the: “Dead Man Who Paid Taxes”………And then you see (Scrooge) their this old reoccurring Hurricane Katrina issues, thatseem to hunt my fucking “Dreams”………..have not even came up with a title yet for the “Sherlock Holmes” Mystery” staringKrooked Hurricane Katrina Attorney Willie M. Zanders et al,...a 2 for 1 sell on Federal Civil Actions ....(some people like it really rough)……
    • Then there is The Sherlock Holmes comedy Case of the Crooked Three Stooges”which is in under a state of Honorable deliberation(s) as we speak..just like ya all’s crooked Scrooge et al Collectively Crooked Asses………In my special “Scrooge Sherlock Holmes Case” of the “Talking TreasureBox”…………….xxoxoxoxBut wait there is “more Scrooge Attorney” you been bump down, and fucking hit theskids to the Number “Three spot” in my “Sherlock Holmes Mysteries fucked up shithead list,.....Coming in Number 2 is none other than my Sherlock Holmes Case: “The PrinceWitch Voodoo Doctor” staring none other the ex-brother in-law….Doctor Prince Samuel Benjamin Magnus- Lawson M.D......(Chapters 1-14) already posted for ya entertainment(s)And for the reasoning of your recent “down grade” (Scrooge Attorney) and trust meI am so very fucking sorry too…..But my Sherlock Holmes Mystery thriller: Case of the “Crooked Dead President” hastaken on whole new very unpredictable touchy feeling “explosive developments”……..“Scrooge Dude” you think your Candy Ass” Lavender Panties is Scared & Semi-Soiledwaiting on that “Mean Old Hang em High Honorable Texas Federal Judge” like theRest(s) of you other shipwreck Rat’s…….You isn’t seen crap”……..like the “Shit” being slightly wash away in the numerousrains in 2 years but still left on your dam “Building” in 2011……..(Report)………(Scrooge Attorney) we is Talking “Top High Dollar End Cut’s of “Killer Bomber” PrimeTime “Political Meat(s)” on the fucking (USDA) Federal Smoking Stoke and Ready
    • Honorable Federal Court’s grill……extra yummy………….xoxoxoxNow you can see my dangerous excuse I respectfully extend to you,I did not want ya feeling a little left out,do not worry here is my special hugs-n-kisses, with some (Smooches)…and a tricky iwill steal you soon some Jell-O desert for your ““Shity pumping” fucked up “TickerScrooge Heart”....don’t want ya going into “Cardio attack” on my “$16.2 Million DollarsInvestments” ...when you stinky eyes open the “Envelope” and read the almost soon to be printedHonorable Courts report-n-recommendations of a Hang em High ordeal...Got to go something likely to fucking explode.. and fuck up something “Reallegal”,....Fucking Wait a second…..?What is this “Scrooge Attorney…..ya really trying to say something to me “Cmdr.Bluefin”…..?“Speak up Scrooge Dude”………:Lives from Houston Texas here is Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur:“I Want you to Die”…. “Mr. Bond”………….O.K. “Gold Finger Scrooge Dude”I’ll just get right on that……Da”…..xoxoxx
    • (Peace out America) See ya Crooked Asses in U.S. Federal Court or on this “Wire Thingy”…..ha, ha, Cmdr. Bluefin and the “Entire Holy Church congregations all chimes in on “Here is Ya some extra special hum……”Dial Tones”……………………… And “No Soup for You”..(Houston Scrooge Attorney)…. from Jerry Seinfeld Show…“Soup Nazi”….Da……xoxoox! Last edited by bluefinlch2; 01-26-2011 at 03:53 PM. Reason: mis-spellbluefinlch2ViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbybluefinlch2 01-28-2011, #902:28PM To Fucked up Doctor Prince Samuel Benjamin Magnus Lawson M.D........xoxoxo"bluefinlch2
    • SeniorMember How is it hanging extra thick V. D. runny light and green-n- yellow dripping “Dick” M.D. Doctor down the old undershorts ex-brother in-law been crooked Ass doing andJoinDate: stealing……Aug2010Location: Boy did you know your fucking super –semi famous too…HoustonPosts:101 , my “Sherlock Holmes Story Case of the Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor is high up there with people like Robert Downey JR. and Judd Law ..... ,“Guy Ritchie and his cheese ass (Sherlock Holmes) movie .... mines the best……… We “Got your sorry ”Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” Lawson M.D. Stinky Yellow –n- Green Dripping Dick Ass” and Submarines and things…… , German Girls, Slaves, Crooked Pirates And plenty of unholy drama for ya mama soon to be fucking un-folding ………. “Live on the Backpage.com”….. The Son of “Bitches like at A/k/a (“Dream Works Inc.”) haves to go and fake shit up (Fucking Bastards)… And sell Movies seats and popcorn, candies, drinks, and things…. plus they get monies too…… I got you………………….. Fucking dripping dick Doctor dude they done went off the “Sherlock Holmes Flipping
    • chart List with “Investigations into: and I shit you not “Jack the Ripper”………, then their Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,....Sherlock Holmes vs. Batman…… (Now somebody out there is smoking some realgood shit on this one…..Here is my P.O. Box 20126 Houston Tx 77225 slip some of that smoke past the(Postal Police)……Let me see what your “Good Smoking Ditch-weed Ass” working with …Fucking “Sherlock Holmes vs. Batman…any thing for a Fucking dollar……….And Drip dick M.D. a fucking “Sherlock Holmes” (Vampire Thriller)….the mean oldone…”Dracula….. (Them bitches “Watson “better watch their fucking throats)…..Did you know they even got the “Question out there is “Sherlock Holmes” a FuckingVulcan….?But don not fret not a second of worries (Stain Shorts M.D.) The Villainous –Professor James Moriarty will still be your sleeper cell agent Brother in “England”A/ka/……Dortrupt……Well Sherlock Holmes Case of the “Crooked Dead President” took a whole newexplosive move for my “Top spot” in my Crooked Collection,all being actual Live in the flesh “Mysteries” with a few dugs up from the “Old GraveGuest appearance personally ……..:eeSo if you really in a Federal (A.T.F.) state of mind style dare wanting to compete thenHook up something “extra explosive scary shit up”
    • And I bump ya Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor Ass (ASAP) back up to the number #1….But I must have to really warn ya (Butt Fuck M.D.)….Sherlock Holmes” Case of the Crooked Dead President is “Very, Very Live…Very top notch Ex-Vice President Explosive shit….Plus they got shit in there that Make ya want to run for cover from “shootingrampages”With old-n- new type wanted “Dead or Live” some motherfucking cold blooded extrascary beating slave, killing niggers, hanging, and blow up your “Church house shit……So if you can beat that….and be my favorite “Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” ex-brotherin-lawI will just for brother in-law old family sake… bump ya Dripping V.D. Dick Ass to #1.....So see you and the fuck up Bride of Doctor Frankenstein in the “Backpage.com“Movies”…..xoxoxooxIts fixing to really start getting scary “Holmes, Watson and XO Cmdr. Bluefin isalmost done with his “High Sea” Adventures in route to (America)….xoxoxoox maybe(65) Chapter too……..but why am I telling you when you been watching the rating too………..Da”Peace the Fuck out “Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor….I got to go……Fucking mom is beating crazy on the dam bath room door again….wanting to know what is fuck taking me so long………….Dam It Mom…….I am playing with my “Dick” again...(MOM…it’s about to“explode………..
    • bluefinlch2ViewPublicProfileFindMorePostsbybluefinlch2 01-29-2011, #1002:28PMblue To “Sticky Fingers” Tom Delay, Future Cell-Block 7 “King Pin”finlch2Senior “How’s ya “Sorry Lame Ass” No Good at Money Laundry, soon to be “Federal Prison”Member yard “Shit pumping Heart” is Fucking Holding out (Too)…..JoinDate:Aug Boy (Dude) you…. (Sticky Fingers Stale Turkey Smelling Tom Delay)….2010Location: I (Cmdr. Bluefin) Hereby shall assert before all of the Honorable Court(s), and TheHouston (USMS) United States Marshall Services, .....Posts:101 from “Maine”….to….”California”….on three of them stack’s of “Holy Books” ….. Truly certified to the entire nation(s) (Federal Prison orientation committee(s)…
    • “Sticky Fingers “Tom Delay” herein” to be an A-1 class criminal .....Whom adjustment times and “Republican Agenda” will fit in just “extra good”,xoxoxo(Sticky “Dip” Fingers)...You buy ya “Crooked Ass” $20.00...worth of “Cup of Noodles Soups,$10.00 worth of “Beef Jerky”,.....Get ya Old Lady to toss ya two bundles of “Smoking Tobacco”over the wall, ....Stuff up your “Fat Funky Criminal Ass”,.....½ pound of “Top Grade “Ditch Weed”, ….16 grams balloons of “Powder Cokecaine”…..22 grams balloons of “Crackcaine”,…..38 E-Tablets,.......100 grams of “Meth”……….
    • And 55 balloons of “Heroin”….Hook up a big batch of Toilet “Flavor” “Jungle Juice” in the “Trash Bag”….with extra“stolen prison “sugar & yeast”……Steal ya some “Chess pieces from the game room” and melt them down for ya someprison “Ink Tattoos”…..Throw on the hard as “old steel” table some grill (USDA) “cheeses sandwiches for allof the fellows welcome committee....And whatever ya do be sure and make you an electrical stringer for some purée walloutlet “Sunday “coffee brunch”……..And you the “King Pin Cell Block-7 Man”….Just ya watch ya fat stale “Turkey smelling Ass” in the Shower…….Any “Bitch” or “Bastard” comes up on ya in “Prison Powder Blue” Jumpsuit”….”talking sick twisted trash”…..Word to the (Dumb) new-be extra wise, slap “her sugar tank Ass” straight out thefucking gate,That’s your “New Girl”……Got to set the “Dick swinging Ho’ Ass Bitch straight from fucking day one…..
    • You tell the “Bitch Ho”….you got the bottom bunks, and them boxer better be starched –n-fold, iron out witha prison comb……and you get the last drag on all smokes….“Anybody extra scary & (Dark)…..toss ya Scary extra “white pale prick Ass” a full new pack of smokes”ya just get the fuck up… smile softly….and “Run……………..That “Nigger” is most definitely looking for some of your “White”…. “Brown Hole”……Don’t worry; I got ya back….when I take the Defendant(s) (The United States ofAmerica) to Trial…I will be hosting a “Wedding Party”…..for the “Jury”...Something (Old, Used & Borrow)….Something “Old” will be the “VP Bomber”…(Crazy Mad Max Dick)….,.With them old Hunt-n-Halloween “KKK” Bombing “Scare-n-Tricks”….Something Used will be “Sarah Palin” Passing out “Killer Drinks” at her poison “TeaParty”…Something “Borrow” will be (YOU)….“Sticky Turkey Smelling Finger(s)”… “Tom Delay”I will be (Borrowing) your Crooked Sticky Fingers Ass from Federal Prison”, ha, ha…..They gonna slap ya Extra Crooked Dumb Ass in some “Fancy Chains” for a ride on“Con Air”
    • For a Little Federal Court Trial Outing…… to see the “Mean Old Hang em High Texas Federal Judge” …..(Again)…… See told ya a Brother Got Ya “Back”……. But remember (Perjury before any Honorable Court is a Crime),…. Hate to see ya “Get set Back further in with “Power Sexy Bitch Blue”……..xioxooo....bluefinlch2View Public ProfileFind More Posts by bluefinlch2 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Facts. Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) will show the HonorableEntitled Court” that the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) corrupt
    • practices against (Negro African Americans) has continue toallowed “judicial manipulation” and “corruption to runrampant” in (The United States of America) and (State of Texas)Judicial Justice system being Direct against the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) because ofhis National origin of (Negro) in favor of a “Whiteman” Moreover Plaintiff continue to be subjected to “racistsegregationist laws” known as “Black Codes” in 2009,2010 and 2011 which is being executed under “non-disclo-sure format” though out the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) and at current in the decision of U. S. MagistrateJudge Nancy Johnson and in the decision of State of Texas,Harris County 215 District Court Judge, Steven Kirkland Obviously provided “Case Fixing & Corruption” in aid &abet for one (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. etal) RICO crimes & under the disguise of “Judicial Civil Pro-ceedings” held before said described Defendant & Co-De-fendants usage of “Judges” specializing in the "big fix" incollusion with (Arthur et al), and (The Marine Building L.L.C. etal) Engaging in furtherance of fraud of the Court, actualfraud conspiracy, case fixing, falsification of official courtrecords. aided in obstruction of justice and conspiracy inHiding assets with the connivance of all illegal activatesbeing conducted during alleged “Honorable Court Pro-ceedings” To sabotage Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) completelyagainst his civil alleged right, peace ,dignity and will solely Because if Plaintiff was allow to legally proceeded the
    • evidence would have indeed uncover the facts that would put(Arthur et al, Attorneys at Laws) And The Marine Building L.L.C. et al, Attorneys at Laws)approximately in excess of (12) “Attorneys all whom being“White Race” in and for the “State of Texas” under (amongother things) “Full disbarment” for a very long time for all ofthe criminal (RICO) mail and wire fraud as described by the ProSe Plaintiff. Plaintiff Assert Respectfully before the “Honorable Courtfirst this action started in Harris County District Court asdescribed by the background information above in and for TheState of Texas, To Wit: 215 District Court Judge “Steven Kirkland” extremein hostile attack of the Plaintiff as to “What do you want” in myCourt room, (Meaning Nigger)“Because of you (Arthur Esq.) hasdismiss his law suit against Christ Church” “To the demeaning hostile unwarranted “open court”attacking of the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein for not being in“attendance” in (Judge Kirkland) Chambers when he alreadyrule in secrete that I (Plaintiff) was not “Homeless” in favor of“Whiteman” (Arthur et al) Regardless by “Law” the hearing was set for a full ruling byan “Honorable Court” in “Private Chambers” by “Honest Law”
    • without the presences of any parties to include the Plaintiff(Hamilton II) as the Judge Kirkland be-little” and usage ofdeception to make the Plaintiff to appear, dim-witted, dense,dull, slow, brainless, unintelligent and XXX stupid. “To now Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) can run his “homelesswith “full intent” “Nigger” self on back to the streets… and“come back”, when he has some “Money”…I (Judge Kirkland)already made my ruling against you….. “Even if your “Homelessand indigent” ….Defendant …. (Arthur Esq.) and (MarineBuilding L.L.C. is a (“Whiteman”)……you can leave now.” The Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) even file the correctdocument as required before hand showing the Plaintiff is infact “Indigent and a “Ward of The Co-Defendant (State of Texas)with Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) submitting of officialdocuments of SSI (Records) as required by Texas State Law infurtherance in Proof of Plaintiff Indigent status, with proof ofthe Plaintiff is in Federal Court filing at present already ruleunder “Indigent status”… which the Co- Defendant (State ofTexas 215 District Court in Harris County Texas was “DeadCertain” in the full 100% protection of “White Defendant”(Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) over PlaintiffHamilton II (Negro) “Nigger”. Plaintiff Assert Respectfully before the “Honorable Court”ahead of this rude, disgusted, crooked, and “shameful display”
    • by the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) 215 District Court” Plaintiff facing former appearance with the “215 DistrictCourt”, had premeditated “veil in disguise” with a group of“Attorneys” several week’s at a lecture for continue legaleducation in which “Judge Steven Kirkland” was a “guest Judgespeaker” for a Group of a “Black Attorneys” discussing his 215Court room rules Like-n-dislike And other stuff to this legal effect” in the Harris CountyCriminal Court Building in Houston Texas….during this timeframe The Judge Kirkland was most respectful, courteous,considerate, and a little humors, to the point several notes thePlaintiff took seem worth giving some consideration. Plaintiff further assert that “Judge Kirkland” ask thequestion “Who like filing long discovery motion which myreaction was to quick and my hand pop up, but I decline toanswer and apologized stating I do not think I should answerthat question, which (Judge Kirkland) was perplex in my replybecause he was under the full impression…. I (Plaintiff) was an“Attorney of Law”...In a “Nice Suit”…in Attendances (Yet)Plaintiff was in fact doing Recon before going before the 215Harris County District Court. The Co-Defendant herein (State of Texas) 215 District Courtin Harris County Texas provided full Illegal case fixing to protect (Arthuret al) fraud activities, with the under stood objective of the Court” to conceal the depositionconducted upon (Arthur Esq.)
    • To the extreme point of (Judge Kirkland) rude falsification of “official court records” thatthe Plaintiff is not Indigent to “apply obstruction of justice” because the Plaintiff is a (Negro)“Nigger” and (Arthur et al) or “White Defendants, Furtherance conspiracy of Defendant (State of Texas) “215 District State Court in “CivilConspirers, Civil Genocide, Aid and abet in Hiding records, documents, evidence, physical assets of (Arthur et al)and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all of which being with the connivance of the Co-Defendant(State of Texas) 215 District Court and in pursed of the same criminal (RICO) criminal objectivesof (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) in Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United StateCode: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud),section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connectionwith identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating tothe laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 inconnection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate(RICO). Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mailand Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit ACriminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include “Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the sameCriminal Objective, Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) Equal Protection under the Law. Breach of contractual written agreement in the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution andall laws thereof to the stated said “effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was a free (Negro) slave”and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in the current time frame in2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed. Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II)civil rights protected by the Co-Defendant(State of Texas) Constitution in Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II asking for relief before a Texas State DistrictCourt for unfair treatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al)before a “Civil Court of Law. Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Aid and abet in Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon theCourt, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching PlaintiffHonesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or Sexual Misconduct, Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander ofthe Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminalactivities.
    • Plaintiff Assert respectfully second this action involving(Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. started next in theUnited States Federal Bob Casey Courthouse in Harris County,Texas after the rouge display in the Defendant (State of Texas)215 District Court in Harris County Texas providing full Illegal casefixing to protect (Arthur et al) fraud activities, with the understood objective of the 215District Court” to conceal the deposition conducted upon (Arthur Esq.) To the extreme point of (Judge Kirkland) rude falsification of “official court records” thatthe Plaintiff is not Indigent to “apply obstruction of justice” in Plaintiff legal pursuit because thePlaintiff is a (Negro) “Nigger” and (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. or “White 90%Attorney(s) Defendants”, The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that theDefendant (The United States of America) U. S. MagistrateJudge Nancy Johnson Aid and abet in Hiding records, documents, evidence, physicalassets of (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all of which being with the connivanceof the Defendant (United States Federal Court Proceeding) and in pursed of the same criminal(RICO) criminal objectives of (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) in Violations underChapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization,Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraudand related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstructionof justice), Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating tothe laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 inconnection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate(RICO). Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mailand Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit ACriminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include “Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the sameCriminal Objective, Defendant (United States of America) Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) Equal Protection underthe Law.
    • Breach of contractual written agreement in the Defendant (United States of America)Constitution and all laws thereof to the stated said “effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was afree (Negro) slave” and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in thecurrent time frame in 2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed. Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II) civil rights protected by the Defendant(United States of America) 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) in that Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is free in asking for relief before a “United States FederalCourt” for unfair treatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al)before a “Civil Court of Law as described in the Complaint(s). To include but not limited to Defendant herein (United States of America) Aid and abet in CivilConspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to PlaintiffPersonal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or SexualMisconduct, Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander ofthe Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminalactivities To Wit: U. S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson Aid and abet inprotection to Hiding & scuttle of records, documents, deposition evidence, and physical assetsof one (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) a “Whiteman & Defendant” over thePlaintiff a (Negro) all of which being with the connivance during Federal Court Proceeding onthe behalf of Defendant herein (The United States of America) in that Aiding and abetting toconspirers to committing Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering with (Arthur et al) and (MarineBuilding L.L.C.) against the civil rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) Furtherance conspiracy of Defendant (The United States of America) “Bob CaseyFederal Courthouse in Harris County, Texas in “Civil Conspirers, Civil Genocide, Destruction,alter and or aid in the direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of thePlaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminalactivities, court case fixing: a. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to “Work product” as described herein b. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to “Client/Attorney Privilege” c. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to Plaintiff have no standing under Texas State Law. d. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to loss in rental income when the Marine was at Maxim capacity when filed civil hostile tort against (Christ et al) e. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to property value loss f. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to Commercial property up keep
    • g. (Court) protection of the deposition evidence from the Plaintiff base solely upon Plaintiff race is (Negro) “Nigger”…Simply because same said deposition was material in usage in stopping (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) civil attack against “White Church” Christ Church Cathedral. But Plaintiff need not apply he is a “Nigger” and under “Jim Crow Laws” and “Black Codes enforcement laws’…All Nigger are stupid because “White folks say so..No matter what the Physical evidence says against a “Whiteman lies”…. h. (Court) protection of the physical photographic evidence in Federal Court files and records by the Plaintiff show the complete impolite, nasty Commercial loss value of property at the Hands of (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.C. et al) to include Commercial & trash Business Legal trash on the ground in said photograph already posted in court files. i. (Court) protection of Defendants fleeing (Marine Building L.L.C et al) during civil proceedings with physical evidence. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) provided a ensnare U. S.upon the Defendant (The United States of America) “Bob Casey” Federal Courthouse direct atMagistrate Judge Nancy Johnson to uncover (Magistrate Judge)Aid and abet in protection to Hiding & scuttle of records, documents, deposition evidence, andphysical assets of one (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) to wit: 1. Nancy K. Johnson is a Federal Magistrate Judge for the United States District Court for theSouthern District of Texas served in this position since 1990, Before becoming a Judge, (Nancy K.Johnson) worked as an “Assistant U.S. Attorney” in Texas and as an Assistant Attorney General in Ohio. 2. The Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) is the Owner of (Bluefin Inc.) and “Multi-Construction Company” and a “United States Navy Veteran”. (Bluefin Inc.) Is a Special Freelance investigator “intelligence agency” within the” United Statesof America”. Simple Plaintiff is (Negro American), therefore which said (Bluefin Inc.) is 100% “exclusivefreelance” to the “XXX Honest”, “XXX Extra Hard working” Defendant herein (U.S. Government) “LawEnforcement” Special agency(s), dealing with those “XXX special individuals” whom are “Well beyondthe Laws of The U.S. of America” and as the CEO of (Bluefin Inc.) I Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) collected “Tax Free” ($$$) from the (U.S.Government) for ” XXX criminal activities” beyond (internal security) of the “U.S. Government” and
    • (communities worldwide) and “without Notice” for such “Hostile activities” that the Defendant herein(The United States of America) “Deem” not so nice and are “forever and a day forbidden”. And on any “U.S. Government” “internal security needs” my CEO rules is simple’ you hunt yourown “Crooks” and I deliver you mines, if you need me take a look at something well ya better have my“cash”. I Plaintiff herein do not need a “stinky badge” or “either a gun”…I tell (U. S. Government) let’stake your “gun and your badge” and let’s go for a (Ride) with me (Cmdr. Bluefin CEO of Bluefin Inc.), (Sometimes) I myself CEO of (Bluefin Inc.)....loves to go get you (XXX Special Criminal) to attemptto break your neck jumping through the back windshield of the (U.S. Government) “Special Car” withthem (as they wait)‘Cuss your an extra “XXX Special Scary Delivery” and they got "wife and kids". now if any E.R. is involved you the (XXX Special Scary Criminal) already having “pistol whip an 8year old child on the play ground”, XXX criminal on the run from the long arm of the law, “XXX Careerspecialist and already “Shot the Government Police in the Ass”... having them all “Hot and extra bothers“So you super suck and qualify for Bluefin Inc. and “business is still business”. Now if the (Retarded XXX Target) is acting “XXX extra Crazy” especially in (communitiesworldwide) with the (U. S. Government) “XXX Honest”, “Extra Hard working” “Military” & “LawEnforcement” “Special agencies” dealing with those whom are “Well beyond the United States ofAmerica Laws” and making my “Customers” all XXX nerves-n-jittery and scary and thangs, Well then by the Power invested in (Cool) me (Cmdr. Bluefin) CEO of (Bluefin Inc.) And completely regardless if I am a (Second Class U.S. Citizen) “business is still business” and I agodly person also whom Loving/liking (Air)... I get to act a (XXX) “Extra Dam Fool” and protect my“Interest” (U.S. Government) from any “on the hot spot” physical harms, threats, and or multi-life endingviolence “until them (U.S. Government) Are return “safe to the full protection of their Government Special agency(s)” dealing with thosein the “Next near Future” whom are consider “Well beyond the Law” of the U.S. of America, whom alsobeing the Hand that feeds “100% Independent” (Bluefin Inc.). Now any XXX person or XXX person(s) within the United States of America who is “above the Lawof the U.S. of America” “especially involving and invoking against my “legal rights” within the Defendant(The United States of America) and making XXX prime not nice and are forever forbidden mistakesagainst the said Laws of the Defendants herein (The United States of America) Namely one” Crooked Scrooge Attorney “Harry C. Arthur Esq.”,” Law office of “Harry C. Arthur etal,” and “The Marine Building L.L.C. et al”, and all whom being “White Race” consider the “Plaintiff a
    • “Derelict” stupid homeless fucking Nigger” Their after the Plaintiff having first hand witness the “XXX humiliation, seriousemotional damage being cause to all of the helpless, weak, and sick at the (Beacon)by direct actsof “XXX Greed” of “Crooked Scrooge Attorney “Harry C. Arthur Esq.”,” Law office of “Harry C. Arthur etal,” and “The Marine Building L.L.C. et al”, after (5) minutes of my (Bluefin Inc.) Special Freelanceinvestigator “intelligence agency” within the” United States of America” at the “Law office of Harry C.Arthur” (Pro Bono) and discover a long list pack of dog straight ass lies Any person or person(s) involved in any cover up after that point of ”Nasty Discovery” and the“Hostile Civil pursuit” against “Christ Church Cathedral” is “XXX Crooked also”. 3. “Harry C. Arthur Esq.” XXX Scrooge Attorney at Law Already Enjoyed direct “Ex-partecommunications” with Harris County 215 District Court Judge (Steven Kirkland) to the point of the 215District Court “complete nasty rudeness” in the open court attack at the (Plaintiff) which caught thePlaintiff (Hamilton II) off guards for about 2 minutes...as all as described above 4. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge,“Nancy K. Johnson”, was not even legally motivated to set a simple “hearing” on a (TRO) TemporaryRestrain order” during 2 ¾ moths timing lapse to protect the Plaintiff “Interest” in among other things(Arthur et al) scuttle of “physical documents”, records and secure the deposition conducted upon(Arthur Esq.) (While the Plaintiff) herein (Hamilton II) watching the” mass fleeing of Defendants” from theMarine Building L.L.C. before any Honorable Court Hearing dates, and the massive dumping of “tons oflegal trash” on the ground by several of the fleeing defendants during a Federal Civil Court proceeding) 5. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge,“Nancy K. Johnson”, was 100% “Motivated by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and(The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) “Hostile Ex-parte communication Complaints By the Plaintiff media blitz counter attack of (Arthur et al) on the Backpag.com (Internet)posting by the Plaintiff herein A/k/a (Cmdr. Bluefin) on the Backpage.com And The “Sherlock Holmes Mystery Writer”. Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “media blitz counter attack of (Arthur et al) , (Law Office of HarryC. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) on the Backpag.com (Internet) as provided above
    • Did in “Facts and all circumstances” secure a quick with less notice a Court Hearing date tonow discuss among other things (TRO) “Temporary Restrain order” of (Arthur et al) which The UnitedStates District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge did not do on her on“Honorable harmony concurrence and accord”. 6. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge,“Nancy K. Johnson”, blatting allowing” (Arthur Esq.) “direct attack” of the Plaintiff reputation in“official Court document(s) also bearing (Arthur Esq.) signature no-less; With (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al)description in said libel documentation “Stating” Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is simply a (Derelict) for evening being in the currentlegal Federal pursuit obligations against other (Crooked Attorneys) as Plaintiff provided for both theU.S. Federal Court” and “Arthur et al” such findings in which the Plaintiff life is past threaten, to thepoint (2) Defendant(s) even refusal in appearance before a “Honorable Court of Law to discuss theparticulars after Plaintiff completed a (Bluefin Inc.) Special Freelance investigator “intelligence agency”personal and XXX personal consultation upon one “Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J.D. Esq.” And his“Clients special criminal actions” as described upon the old, sick, and helpless Thus Bringing about the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) to these (Harris County) area in 2009until the dust settle and said Defendant(s) “Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J.D. Esq.” And his “Clients veryhumors refusal in appearance before a “Honorable U.S. Federal Court of Law” in Beaumont Texas todiscuss the particulars “But the Defendant (The United States of America) U.S. Federal Court here in (Houston Texas)is standing strong behind and quite bogus ” in support with (Arthur Esq.) “direct attack” of thePlaintiff reputation in “official Court document(s)” Also bearing (Arthur Esq.) signature no-less “ Plaintiff “ herein (Hamilton II) is “100% standingProof” a “Derelict” for being in any other “legal Civil Federal obligations “ before a ” Honorable Courtof Law” provided the Plaintiff all of the needed support that the “The Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) is “100% in protection of the deposition of Arthur Esq. 7. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge,“Nancy K. Johnson”, and (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine BuildingL.L.C. et al) all having full firsthand knowledge of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) filing “Depositionevidence against one “Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus-Lawson M.D.” in Bob Casey” HonorableUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Texas with a “Sherlock Mystery Story” Case ofthe: “The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” by the Plaintiff in which all the particulars are indeed facts’.
    • 8. The Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) Respectfully assert before this Honorable United StatesFederal Court that in addition to all of the “Aid and abet” in protection to Hiding & scuttle ofrecords, documents, deposition evidence, and physical assets of one (Arthur et al), (Law Officeof Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) by Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K.Johnson” the extreme (RICO) criminal particulars that are indeed facts’ against (Arthur et al), (LawOffice of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) was first put in a “SherlockHolmes” Complaint, Manuscript and filed in U.S. Federal of the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) and titled the “Sherlock Holmes Case of “The Talking Treasure Box”. The Facts and particulars are involving “Historic Scrooge”, and “Charles Dickens” ChristmasCarol” and the Deposition of (Arthur Esq.) is center around the solving of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II)“Sherlock Holmes Mystery”, furtherance in advance which (Andy Vickery) Attorney for “Christ ChurchCathedral” already provided the Plaintiff full facts that the deposition having been completed on (ArthurEsq.)and quite very Civil in damaging, 9. Since I Plaintiff (Hamilton II) provided “Christ Church Cathedral” “Legal Team” detail’s in theparticulars of Plaintiff future Civil offense attack against against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C.Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) in advance of (Arthur Esq.) being deposed under oathof a deposition leaving (Arthur Esq.) fully expose to the Plaintiff thus placing “Christ Church Cathedral”Legal Team” in a well place advantage position which in all “Facts and legal circumstance” brought aboutthe non-suit filing by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine buildingL.L.C. et al) to dismiss against “Christ Church Cathedral et al”. 10. The Plaintiff Respectfully assert before the “Honorable Court” evidence of the Deposition of(Arthur Esq.) is the Center of all disputes “Meaning the second the deposition is made to light the truthis set free, which the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas)strongly conspire before hand to keep 100% conceal in Favor of (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C.Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all being 99.9% (White) race against “The Plaintiffherein (Hamilton II” base solely upon his (Race) Negro “Nigger”, The full facts of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) support a Jury Trial, and The Defendant (TheUnited States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) having full criminal intentions in theftof a “Civil Jury” overdue rights to weight all facts and decide for them self on such damaging facts andcircumstances as described in the Original Complaint, The First Amend Complaint, and final in the (2)Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff with now supported factual documents being provided by (Arthur etal) through “Trickery”. 11.
    • The Plaintiff Respectfully Assert before the Honorable Court, that the “Plaintiff “SherlockHolmes Mystery story” Case of: The Talking Treasure Box against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of HarryC. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) having caused great Judicial following to keepunder complete raps for the massive Fraudulent contents. 12. The Collection of the Criminal Scuttle of the current physical legal documents by (Arthur et al),(Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) now place into FederalCourt Records custody, Were completed by the Plaintiff before the 14 day of February 2011, before The United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, signaturewas upon the official order. To include but not limited to Plaintiff assert before the “Honorable Court” that the day the ex-parte communication was made between the (Arthur et al) and United States District Court for theSouthern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, in regards to the posting onBackpage.com , setting a hearing for a (TRO); (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) wasworking “overtime and quit secure in their choir” in “operation Federal scuttle” Because they (Arthur et al) knew the Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, civilruling results before hand that moment being in favor of ((Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C.Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) even before 2/7/2011 from the events of massivefleeing by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al)after knowing Plaintiff is no longer a “Civil Threat” 13. While the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “Bluefin Inc.” “Completely watching” (MarineBuilding L.L.C. et al) and their furtherance completed their (RICO) criminal scheme of things inscuttle legal documents acts & fleeing with relive, take pressure off, alleviated ease, as Plaintiff(Hamilton II) being at will himself, in picking through a massive pile of “Legal trash” behind theLaw Office of Harry C. Arthur et al with “Special Bonus Documents” contain the Plaintiff herein(Hamilton II) name on it with the hearing date of 2/7/2011 and the Invoice of The Marine BuildingL.L.C. rental Agreement and price listing (Among other Legal) documents Plaintiff having in hispossession, custody, and control before the Defendant (The United States of America) United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson” big casefixing acts to dismissed the (RICO) claims against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al)and (Marine building L.L.C. et al). 14.
    • The Defendant herein (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant herein (TheState of Texas) (Judicial System) among other “Government Functions” continue in 2011 to bein power and in full charge under “racist segregationist laws” known as “Black Codes” govern(Slavery) over the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “Intelligence” that the “Plaintiff (Hamilton II) notinborn with the ability to learn and think but that ability as improved by educations: Thus Whites having superior intelligence and The Defendant herein (The United Statesof America) and Co-Defendant herein (The State of Texas) both (Judicial System) intent onsecuring “White Rule” under non disclosure extremist doctrine declaring Plaintiff (Hamilton II)civil effective measures as described under “Federal and State Constitution laws herein is fullynull void and deem unconstitutional in a well strategy imposing measure intended to prevent aprecise Equality between Plaintiff Hamilton II (Negro) ability to bring Civil Charges against a (Whiteman)(Arthur et al) by precise deliberately imposing “Civil Genocide” upon the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II)Negro (Nigger) with the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of the Plaintiff herein(Hamilton II) fairness in suit in common law against a “Whiteman” • The Defendant (United States of America) population accounts for approximately 5% of the world’s population. • Yet, the Defendant (United States of America) holds 25% of the worlds prisoners in its prisons. • That makes the good old Defendant (U.S.A) the #1 prison nation in the world! • But, you see, that also makes the U.S.A. the #1 legal slave owner in the world… • The U.S. incarceration rate on June 30, 2009 was 748 inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents, or 0.75%. • (Negro) Blacks Americans contribute about half of all prison inmates when (Negro) Blacks Americans are only 13 percent of the Defendant (United States of America) population. • minorities are more likely to be executed than whites convicted of the same crime. • The purpose entering the civil justice system seeking equity and redress for damages during public “Civil Trial” is to ensure fairness, accuracy, and truthfulness. Conclusion The Defendant (United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas)continue restraining the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) among other (Negro) African Americans whom won“Civil Right’s. The doctrine of “absolute immunity” for Judges was passed by the Defendant (TheUnited States of America) at the “exact moment” (Negro) Blacks African Americans won “CivilRight’s.
    • And this “Absolute Immunity” applies even when the Defendant (The United States ofAmerica) Judges are accused of acting “maliciously and “corruptly” secured by the Defendant(United States Supreme Court: Harlow v. Fitzgerald, Mareles v. Waco, and Pierson v. Ray Negro (Nigger) within the defendant (The United States of America) having continue to in2011 suffer wrongful incarceration than whites convicted of the same crime under abuse of doctrine of“absolute immunity” in suit in common law, the same still apply, “Niggers need not apply” only (80) years prison term and the “lethal injection” isyour civil future against a “Whiteman” Cause of Action The Plaintiff and Plaintiffs reincorporate everything from paragraph (1) throughparagraph (14) as fully set-forth herein in for cause of damages:Injury to Personal Reputation, Discrimination, Defamation, Fraud, Civil Conspiracies,Impeaching Honesty, Injury to Reputation, Imputation of Crime, Disease and Sexual MisconductBreach of contractual written agreement in the Defendant (The United State of America)and Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution and all laws thereof to the stated said“effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was a free (Negro) slave”and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in the currenttime frame in 2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed.Abuse of Judicial Absolute ImmunityAbuse of Official ImmunityAiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignityand will of the PlaintiffObstruction of Justice, Obstruction of Criminal Investigation, Conspiracies to pursue the sameCriminal ObjectiveViolation of Plaintiff (Hamilton II) Equal Protection under the LawViolations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences CorruptionOrganization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028(relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503(relating to obstruction of justice), Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating tothe laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 inconnection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate(RICO).
    • Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mailand Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit ACriminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include “Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the sameCriminal Objective, Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II) civil rights protected by the Defendant (TheUnited States of America and the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution In Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II asking for relief before a Texas State District Court for unfairtreatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) before a “CivilCourt of Law. Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectation damages,foreseeable, future, land, hedonic, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, treble under(RICO), proximate, prospective, special, speculative, substantial, punitive, and permanentdamages Declaration Judgment by a “Jury” that each and every claim, accusation, assertion,contention and charges in all allegations as described fully herein against all Defendants, andtheir agents being entry into the action of this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff Hamilton II(Negro) Black Africa AmericanThe Plaintiff seeks “treble damages” under (RICO) Statue against all defendants herein Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for “serious past, present ,and futureIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being imposed, tariff and levyboth past, current, and future to include but not limited to for all of the Defendant and Co-defendant extreme and outrageous acts as described herein: Awards 1. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition to the above fore-mention damages awards of direct, actual, compensatory, Direct damages paid to the Pro Se Plaintiff for the wrongful loss in direct damages in the ‘amount of Defendant (United States of America et al) $ 48.6 Million Dollars….for the Com- pensation loss of 16.2 Million Dollars Plaintiff herein “suffer & Continue to suffer” at the “Hand of the Defendants (The Unit- ed States of America) in a Federal District Court Civil Action filed in Bob Case Federal Court House in Houston Texas.
    • 2. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seek payment from the Defendant (United States of America) made in a Check payable to “Christ Church Cathedral” in the amount of …… $17,343,681.82. for (Charity on the behalf of the Plaintiff) 3. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition from the Defendant (the Unit- ed States of America) a Check payable to the direct complete, possession, custody 100% con- trol, of “Director” Christine Vera-Green “only” in Port Arthur Texas 77640 “Hospitality Kitchen for the Poor” “up-grade” on the behalf of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein in the amount of ………$13,177,440.92 for the Plaintiff “Hometown Charity”. 4. Co-Defendant (State of Texas et al) $7.2 Million Dollars… The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition to the above fore-mention damages awards of direct, actual, compensatory, Direct damages paid to the Pro Se Plaintiff for Co-Defendant (State of the wrongful loss in direct damages in the ‘amount of Texas et al) $7.2 Million Dollars for the Compensation loss of 2.4 Million Dollars Plaintiff suffer & Continue to suffer at the “Hand of the Defendants (The State of Texas et al , Harris County Court House et al) in a States Court Civil Action filed in Bob Case Federal Court House in Houston Texas 5. Co-Defendant (The State of Texas et al) made in a Check payable to “Christ Church Cathedral” in the amount of …$2.800, 000.00 for (Charity on the behalf of the Plaintiff). 6. The Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) seeks in addition from the Defendant (the Unit- ed States of America) a Check payable to the direct complete, possession, custody 100% con- trol, of “Director” Christine Vera-Green “only” in Port Arthur Texas 77640 “Hospitality Kitchen for the Poor ” “up-grade” on the behalf of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein in the amount of ………..$2,856,498.93. For the Plaintiff “Hometown Charity”. And for all “Deem just and being Honorable before this United States Federal Court during alawful proceeding on the behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II.Respectfully Submitted By:
    • _______________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P.O. Box 20126 Houston Texas 77225