2. • B I G I D E A S A N D C O M M U N I T Y R E S O U R C E S
• C A L L T O A C T I O N & W I L D C A T L E A R N I N G
L A B 2 0 1 3
• P R E L I M I N A R Y I M P A C T
• F O R M I N G A M O D E L F O R I N C R E A S E D
I M P A C T A N D U S E O F R E S O U R C E S
Agenda
3. L I T E R A C Y I N O U R C O M M U N I T Y
B I G I D E A S F O R I N T E R V E N T I O N
C O M M U N I T Y R E S O U R C E S
F O C U S O N R E A D I N G
Big Ideas and
Community Resources
4. Literacy Crisis in our Community
2009-2010 school year, 38.3% of students attending
schools in Kent County are not at the proficient
reading level (Standard and Poor’s School
Evaluation Service)
20% of children with a learning disability entering
our schools will face a significant challenge in
learning to read (NIH)
If these children do not receive appropriate
intervention by third grade (age nine), 74% of them
will never catch up (NIH)
5. Harrison Park School GRPS District
Students Proficient in
Reading at the end of
3rd Grade: 59.6%
Student Academic
Growth 3-8: 12.7%
Students Proficient in
Math and Reading 3-8:
16.6%
Students Proficient in
Reading at the end of
3rd Grade: 53.2%
Student Academic
Growth 3-8: 12.6%
Students Proficient in
Math and Reading 3-8:
18.2%
2012-2013 MEAP Data
7. Common Models for
Supplementary Reading Programs
Afterschool Programs with Activities
Activities may or may not be reading specific
Methodologies vary
Mentoring/Positive Interactions and Role Models
Activities may or may not be reading specific
Methodologies vary
Homework Assistance
Activities may or may not be reading specific
Methodologies vary
Comprehension and Fluency Practice
Activities may or may not be reading specific
Methodologies vary
8. Common Struggles
Scheduling of Volunteers
Resources needed by the school
Management/Coordination of physical and human
resources
Student transfer of skills (e.g. relating to multiple
settings)
Specialized training for working with students who
struggle with learning
Need instruction rather than exposure only
Training in reading development and curriculum connection
10. Call to Action for Summer 2013
H A R R I S O N P A R K S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T T E A M
I D E N T I F I E D A G A P / N E E D :
U N D E R A C H I E V E M E N T O F 2 N D G R A D E S T U D E N T S O N
S P R I N G M A P S I N R E A D I N G A S C O M P A R E D T O
P A T T E R N S O F G R A D E S 3 - 5
11. What can we do? Develop a community
supported summer option
focused on 2nd grade
readers
12. KSSN Network
Review of
Student/Community
Need and Request for
Support – very limited
funding!
Secure Volunteers
Secure Specialized
Resources
KSSN Community
School Leadership
Team Design Program
Rationale, Format and
Description
Final Touches
March/April 2013 March/April 2013 April 2013
April/May 2013May 2013
14. Brief Site Resource Analysis
GRPS
Summer School
Already Available
&
Already Funded
Not targeted to
specific grades
Harrison Park
School
Facility and Staff in
use for GRPS
Summer School
Facility and Staff in
use for GRPS
Summer School &
Large need for 2nd
grade reading push
KSSN
Site Coordinator
Not Teaching Staff
& No “Extra”
Funding
15. Key Challenges
Funding
Trained Teachers/Tutors to provide instruction and
effective intervention
Student supervision
Lack of resources for training for intervention
Personnel for supervision/coordination of adults
16. Gerontology Network SLD Center
Had a relationship with
school and district
Need/Gap: volunteers
needed specialized training
& direction from educators
for intervention (including
materials)
Had a relationship with
school and district
Need/Gap: minimal
number of volunteers
available & requirements
for implementation of 1:1
intervention with fidelity
In the Meantime…..
17. The Stars Aligned
GN and SLD were in conversations about developing
collaboration options
SLD and GRPS were in conversations regarding
expanding various collaborations for 2013-2014
school year
GRPS and GN were in conversation for maintaining
collaborations for the 2013-2014 school year
The GR Community Foundation was in conversation
with all three groups.
20. Funding
Organizational structures provided much cost
savings
SLD Center – no new program or materials required to be
developed
Gerontology Network – no new program or funding required
to provide volunteers for training and/or summer
GRPS – Harrison Park already in use for Summer School
Funding needed for Training, Training Materials and
Internship Implementation
22. Program Goal
Increase the success rate of this cohort of students
and increase their success as 6th grade Challenge
Scholars by providing rigorous summer learning
supports focused in all areas of reading
23. Start Up: Specialized Intervention
Intervention:
Training of
Specialized
Tutors
• June 4-June 13,
2013 Phonics
Fundamentals: 32
hour training
through SLD
Center including
curriculum
materials &
multisensory tools
• 21 volunteers from
GN trained to
work with HP
students at
Wildcat Learning
Lab
Intervention
• Baseline Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment
Specialists
• GN Volunteers work
directly with 2nd
grade students during
Wildcat Learning Lab
• 21 students receive 1:1
reading instruction for
1 hour per day when in
attendance at Wildcat
Learning Lab
• Post Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment
Specialists
Intervention:
Fidelity of
Implementation
• GN Volunteers work
1:1 with an SLDC
Master Tutor for first
20 hours with a
student (internship
phase)
• SLDC Observers
provide direct
feedback on
curriculum use and
methodology for
interns as well
continuing SLDC
tutors
24. Funding Breakdown
$11,300
• Phonics
Fundamentals:
32 hour
training
through SLD
Center including
curriculum
materials &
multisensory
tools
$3,300
• Baseline
Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment
Specialists
• GN Volunteers work
directly with 2nd
grade students during
Wildcat Learning Lab
• 21 students receive 1:1
reading instruction for
1 hour per day when in
attendance at Wildcat
Learning Lab
• Post Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment
Specialists
• Coordination of
student/tutor
schedules and
materials
$4,400
• GN Volunteers work
1:1 with an SLDC
Master Tutor for
first 20 hours with
a student
(internship phase)
• SLDC Observers
provide direct
feedback on
curriculum use and
methodology for
interns as well
continuing SLDC
tutors
25. Our “AHA!” of Sustainability
$3,300
• Baseline
Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment Specialists
• GN Volunteers work
directly with 2nd
grade students during
Wildcat Learning Lab
• 21 students receive 1:1
reading instruction for
1 hour per day when in
attendance at Wildcat
Learning Lab
• Post Assessment
completed for each
student by SLDC
Assessment Specialists
• Coordination of
student/tutor
schedules and
materials
• Bulk of cost for volunteers
trained for specialized
intervention was training and
internship
• To maintain Language Links
with same volunteers
approximately $3,300 during
academic year per site
26. Additional Goal
“large scale social change comes from better cross-
sector coordination rather than from the isolated
intervention of individual organizations” (Kania &
Kramer, 2011)
Establish a framework for collaboration for collective
impact rather than isolated impact
a.k.a. maximize the value of the expertise and development
established during the summer program
28. Potential
Collective
Impact
2013-2014
Impact through
ONLY those
volunteers trained
during summer
2013
194 students
Summer Impact: minimum of 18 students through
Wildcat Learning Lab and LOOP
Academic Year Impact: 176 students
13,090 Hours of
Intervention
Summer Hours of Intervention: 230
Academic Year Hours of Intervention: 10,560
6 GRPS Buildings
Building Breakdown of Impact by Percentage
Summer
Harrison Park, 100%
Academic Year 2013-2014
Harrison Park, 59%
Campus, 14%
Palmer, 9%
Mulick Park, 5%
Buchanan, 9%
Brookside, 9%
29. “…FINDINGS SUPPORT A STRONG
FOCUS IN TITLE I SCHOOLS ON
IMPROVING CLASSROOM
INSTRUCTION AND THEN PROVIDING
ONE-TO-ONE, PHONETIC TUTORING
TO STUDENTS WHO CONTINUE TO
EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES”
(SLAVIN, 2011)
Impact Measurement
31. Experience Corps
Use school based academic and attendance data for
individual students
MAPS, DIBELS and MEAP
Students selected by school admin and teachers
Teacher Feedback
More than 80% of teachers report that students who work with
AARP Experience Corps members made significant academic
progress
2012-2013 were NOT in Harrison Park School
33. “THE POWER OF COLLECTIVE ACTION
COMES NOT FROM THE SHEER NUMBER OF
PARTICIPANTS OR THE UNIFORMITY OF
THEIR EFFORTS, BUT FROM THE
COORDINATION OF THEIR
DIFFERENTIATED ACTIVITIES THROUGH A
MUTUALLY REINFORCING PLAN OF
ACTION” (KANIA & KRAMER, 2011)
Forming a Model for Increased
Impact of Volunteer Programs
36. Leveled Programs for Volunteers
Varied opportunities to
maximize expertise of
volunteers
Volunteers with specialized
trainings in all GN programs
as appropriate
Expand options for
volunteers of both
organizations
Maximize support for
student transfer of skills
Experience Corps volunteers
see in settings outside of
Language Links and can use
multisensory supports in
areas other than Reading
Experience
Corps Language
Links
Experience
Corps
Foster
Grandparents
38. S P E E D B U M P S
C E L E B R A T I O N S
O U T L I E R S
Last Thoughts
39. Speed Bumps
Recruitment of Students
Targeted for 18-21 students
Principal brought in students
from Summer School which
varied ages more than
planned
Had 6-8 with 5 completing
the entire Lab
Attendance of Students
None of the students were
present for all 40 hours of
available instruction
Maximum Language Links
instruction was 18 hours
Moving students into
program after start date
impacted motivation
Format of Lab Varied from
Usual for All Organizations
KSSN Site Coordinator
Moved
LL Coordinator not available
in summer
Shortage of Master Tutors to
mentor for internships
Volunteers used to 1:1
settings rather than working
in proximity
EC Volunteers receive daily
communication (and
materials) from classroom
teacher/school
40. Celebrations
Student numbers
allowed for increased
observation
opportunities for interns
Increased opportunities
for volunteers
Sep 2013:
One student was from
another GRPS Elementary
School. She will be
repeating 1st grade this
year.
Direct feedback: this
student noticeably
increased her MAPS
Reading score to 49%ile
and has “finally” moved to
the yellow level on
DIBELS (from Intense to
Strategic)
41. Outliers
Materials Management
PF materials are
copyrighted and in use
only for Language Links
or SLD Tutoring Sessions
Building Coordination
for School Year
Consistent
communications with
district
Collaboration outside of
GRPS
Student numbers
allowed for increased
observation
opportunities for interns
Collective definition of
data measurements
Full data analysis
Coordination of data
sharing and compilation
of report out
42. Research
Support
Hernandez, Donald J. (2012)
Double Jeopardy: How Third-
Grade Reading Skills and Poverty
Influence High School Gradution.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Kania, John & Mark Kramer (2011)
Collective Impact, Stanford Social
Innovation Review.
National Center for Reading
Disabilities. (2011). Parent’s Guide
to RtI.
National Reading Panel. Teaching
Children to Read. Summary
Report (April 13, 2000)
Slavin, Robert. (2011) Effective
Reading Programs for Title I
Schools. John Hopkins University.
Wolf, M. (2007) Proust and the
Squid: the story and sequence of
the reading brain. Harper Collins
Publishers.