• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Pensions - a primer for Canadians
 

Pensions - a primer for Canadians

on

  • 630 views

Some basics on the following issues: ...

Some basics on the following issues:
1. The public pension system (Old Age Security/GIS and Canada Pension Plan)
2. Workplace pensions and the attack on pensions
3. The funding of pensions and the tensions inherent in 'financialized' retirement security

Statistics

Views

Total Views
630
Views on SlideShare
492
Embed Views
138

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 138

http://www.socialjustice.org 138

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Pensions - a primer for Canadians Pensions - a primer for Canadians Presentation Transcript

    • CSJ Pension “Primer” Friday, September 20th, 2013 Centre for Social Justice 720 Bathurst St.
    • Agenda * Introductions & Goals, * Ground rules for the session 1) Public Pension System 2) Workplace pensions 3) Employer and government attacks on pensions 4) Tensions in private and “financialized” retirement security Q & A & Discussion
    • 1. Public pension system  What IS a pension?  Fight for “old age” pensions dates back 200+ years, relates to disability and unemployment struggles  Police, military, government workers (Hamilton)  Railroad, banking/insurance  Old Age Security 1927 (means tested), 1952 (universal)  Canada Pension Plan (1966)
    • Public pension system cont'd CPP benefits:  Up to 25% of Avg Industrial Wage (2013:$12,775) – Avg pensions: $6,300/yr  100% indexed, age 65 (early retirement at 60 w/penalty)  Disability component, survivor benefits etc OAS benefits:  $6,600 / yr (w/residency requirement)  100% indexed, age 65  (Harper phasing in age 67)
    • Public pensions cont'd  Wage derived systems reproduced gender inequalities  LICO poverty rates among single senior women only recently came down due to CPP maturity (1970s: 70%, 1990s: 40%, 2013: 14%)  Much continuing debate about current status, but very small public system crucially important  OAS-GIS funded by general tax revenues, CPP funded by payroll contributions  1998 – CPP investment policy changed
    • 2. Workplace pensions  Widely established only in post-war period, combination of industrial base (auto, steel, etc) and public sector  A compromise for labour movement – some were fighting for European style public systems, ended up winning US style workplace based system with minimal public foundation (US & UK influence)  Defined Benefit plans were the standard model, only recently have RRSPs & “defined contribution” plans emerged  Pension coverage peaked in 1991 – 45% of workforce covered by a registered pension plan
    • Workplace pensions cont'd  Defined Benefit Features:  A formula defines the pension that is “promised”  Collective pool for investing contributions  Funding security, with employer liability (or mix)  Once earned, benefits are not reducible – need a source of funding  Pay a life “annuity” or pension  Often “indexed” to inflation, early retirement options  Risk is spread across entire worker population, shared with employer, and spread over time
    • Workplace pensions cont'd Defined contribution (DC) features:  No promised benefit formula, risk borne by worker  Individualized scheme (like RRSP), investment options up to individual  Result is “lump sum” at retirement, not a pension – options to annuitize, stay invested, hope $ doesn't run out  Highly subjected to marketing by industries  “Vested” and covered by some investment rules (unlike RRSPs)
    • 3. Employer & Gov't attacks on pensions In the neoliberal period, expansion of workplace plans was turned around dramatically (1991 peak of coverage) Non unionized private sector went first (Banks, insurance, smaller employers) More recently, unionized private sector (Vale Inco, St. Mary's Cement, Air Canada, Big 3 Auto) Very recently, unionized public sector also under attack (Fed PS, OPS & public
    • Attacks cont'd Rationale for attacks: ● Financial markets no longer delivering high returns ● 2008 financial crisis & long term interest rates & rising mortality combining to produce large deficits ● Pensions being declared “unsustainable”, no longer “affordable” ● in some cases, employer costs truly are spiking
    • Attacks cont'd ● Benefit cuts (indexing dropped, early retirement cut, basic formula reduced, etc) ● Closure of DB pensions, new hires model – two-tier pension structures ● More recent: transfer DB risk to members through “Target Benefit” type plans (NB, OTPP, etc)
    • 4. Tensions in “financialized” retirement security Was original establishment of workplace based plans a mistake? (GM vs UAW) In US & Canada, private finance resisted public programs, promoted various alternatives including workplace based private arrangements
    • Tensions cont'd Peter Drucker, Pension Fund Socialism (1976): ● Exaggerates pension ownership of equities ● Endorses new ownership reality as a kind of “end of history” - workers now owners ● Workers, unions, can now understand business priorities, tax policy, wage policy
    • Tensions cont'd ● Certain socialists, trade unionists take up idea that real economic power available to transform society, possibly socialize ownership ● Meidner Plan in Sweden ● Robin Blackburn revives Meidner in 2002 for UK, US
    • Tensions cont'd Various kinds of social reformers also inspired by concepts: ● Some unions seek control or joint control ● Emergency of “socially responsible investment” (faith groups, others) ● More recently, “sustainable investing”, and even “sustainable capitalism” (Robert Monks) ● Are we trying to “save” capitalism, or transform/overcome it?
    • Tensions cont'd ● Pension funds no longer passive investors! ● The “Rise of Finance”, and financialization, has meant more political and economic power to finance ● OMERS, OTPP role in privatization (P3s) ● Pension fund “imperialism”? ● LBOs, private equity (restructuring), hedge funds (Porter Airlines, Cari-All, foreign water P3s)
    • Solving the tensions? Strategy #1 – Work within the system: We should seize tools at hand, work within financial system via corporate governance, SRI, UN Principles of Responsible Investment Strategy #2 – Challenge the system itself: We need a class based strategy to re- construct retirement security for all workers, with less integration with capitalist finance,