SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
MESO SCALE DISCOVERY, MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, MSD, MSD GOLD, DISCOVERY WORKBENCH, MULTI-ARRAY, MULTI-SPOT, QUICKPLEX, SECTOR, SECTOR PR, SECTOR HTS, SULFO-TAG, U-PLEX, S-PLEX,
V-PLEX, STREPTAVIDIN GOLD, MESO, www.mesoscale.com, SMALL SPOT (design), 96 WELL 1, 4, 7, & 10-SPOT (designs), 384 WELL 1 & 4-SPOT (designs), MSD (design), U-PLEX (design), S-PLEX (design), V-PLEX (design),
and SPOT THE DIFFERENCE are trademarks and/or service marks of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
©2015 Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. All rights reserved.
To assess dilution linearity, six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, CSF, and urine samples were tested at 4 dilution factors. The initial
dilution factor was determined from the literature or measurement of a subset of samples. The selected sample dilution factor was set as
100% recovery. The average % recovery for most of the analytes in the samples fell between 75% and 125%. The % recovery was
elevated for samples approaching the lower limit of quantification (e.g., ICAM-3 in urine samples).
The graphs below show the average % recovery for each analyte at each dilution.
% Recovery = (measured x dilution factor)/expected x 100
M1028
Rapid Development of Fit-for-Purpose Multiplex Panels on the U-PLEX® Assay Platform
DOWNLOAD POSTER
8 Conclusion
Fit-for-Purpose multiplex panels were developed for a set of 21 analytes on the U-PLEX platform. Assay feasibility was
determined by testing for specificity, spike recovery, and dilution linearity. Relative sample abundance required the
analytes to be separated into focused multiplex panels. The U-PLEX platform enables the easy reconfiguration of
multiplex panels depending on the need.
Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop more than 20 biomarker assays and assess feasibility of multiplexing. Multiplexing of
biomarkers is often a challenge due to differences in analyte abundance in matrix and assay diluent requirements. This leads to the need
to reconfigure panels during the early stages of assay development. The U-PLEX assay platform is designed to enable rapid and flexible
creation of multiplex immunoassays using MSD’s MULTI-ARRAY® technology.
Methods: The U-PLEX platform consists of 10 unique U-PLEX linkers that specifically bind to 10 distinct locations (“spots”) at the bottom of
each well of a 96-well U-PLEX plate. Each U-PLEX linker has a biotin-binding domain that couples to a biotinylated capture reagent as
well as a domain that binds to its corresponding spot on the plate. Antibody pairs were screened on the U-PLEX platform, followed by
measurement of analyte levels in serum, plasma, urine, and CSF. The assays were reconfigured into fit-for-purpose assay panels, and
then assessed for specificity and matrix tolerance.
Results: Based on the initial assessments of analyte abundance and assay specificity, the assays were configured as several multiplex
panels. In the initial assessment, the assay dynamic ranges spanned 3-5 orders of magnitude. However, the samples still required
dilutions between 2- and 4000-fold. In addition, improved matrix tolerance was achieved for some assays through use of different assay
diluents. Based on these criteria, we were able to group the assays into preliminary multiplex panels in less than one week. Dilution
linearity and spike recovery studies demonstrated acceptable matrix tolerance and accurate quantification for most of the assays tested
across all matrices (typically between 75-125%). For assays that did not meet these criteria, further assay development or rescreening of
antibodies could be performed. The analytes in the final panels typically exhibited non-specific binding of less than 1.0%. Fit-for-purpose
panels were established within 3 weeks using as little as 200 µg of each antibody.
Conclusion: The U-PLEX platform facilitated the rapid reconfiguration of fit-for-purpose multiplex panels, reducing assay development
time. The resulting panels are suitable for use in early exploratory studies, and are primed for analytical validation.
1 Abstract
MSD’s electrochemiluminescence detection technology uses SULFO-TAG™ labels that emit light upon electrochemical stimulation initiated
at the electrode surfaces of MULTI-ARRAY and MULTI-SPOT® microplates. The U-PLEX assay platform utilizes 10 unique linkers that
specifically bind to individual spots enabling simple and flexible creation of multiplex immunoassays.
2 Methods
Electrochemiluminescence Technology
• Minimal non-specific background and strong
responses to analyte yield high signal-to-background
ratios.
• The stimulation mechanism (electricity) is decoupled
from the response (light signal), minimizing matrix
interference.
• Only labels bound near the electrode surface are
excited, enabling non-washed assays.
• Labels are stable, non-radioactive, and directly
conjugated to biological molecules.
• Emission at ~620 nm eliminates problems with color
quenching.
• Multiple rounds of label excitation and emission
enhance light levels and improve sensitivity.
• Carbon electrode surface has 10X greater binding
capacity than polystyrene wells.
Six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, CSF, and urine samples were spiked with calibrators at multiple levels throughout the linear
range of the assay. Spikes were made into neat or diluted samples; the selected dilution factor was determined from the dilution linearity.
Most of the analytes recovered between 75% and 125% at each spike level. For Panel A, under-recovery was observed for several
analytes; further diluent optimization is recommended for these analytes.
The graphs below show the average % recovery for each analyte at each spike level.
5 Spike Recovery
To determine the specificity of the detection antibodies, blended calibrators were tested with each detection antibody. The non-specific
interactions were below 1.0% for most analytes.
4 Dilution Linearity
Danielle Russell, Jennifer Lewis, Emily Spang, Pankaj Oberoi, and Jacob N. Wohlstadter
Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, Maryland, USA
NBC-15-504-TN-MM/YY
Six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, urine, and CSF samples
were tested across all three multiplex panels. The majority of
samples measured above the lower limit of detection (LLOD). The
table below provides the limits of detection and the concentration
units for different assays.
The LLOD is a calculated concentration based on a signal that is
2.5 standard deviations over the blank. The median LLOD is
calculated over 6 runs. The upper limit of detection (ULOD) is the
highest calibrator concentration. Detection limits are reported at
their dilution-adjusted concentration.
7 Sample Testing
Antibodies were screened and selected (data not shown). The
final capture and detection antibodies were conjugated to biotin
and SULFO-TAG, respectively. Performance of each assay was
confirmed by testing standard curves. A set of 21 assays was
grouped into 3 preliminary multiplex panels; reagents and
groupings were determined based on abundance levels.
The standard curves shown below and to the right illustrate the
sensitivity and dynamic range of the 21 assays in the U-PLEX
feasibility study. The graphs display representative data from a
single run.
3 Antibodies and Reagents Selected Panel A
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
Angiopoietin 1Angiopoietin 1
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
Thrombomodulin
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
ICAM-3ICAM-3
SDF-1
Concentration (pg/mL)
Signal
Panel B
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
Eotaxin-2
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RII
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
TNF-RII
TNF-RI
P-Cadherin
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
MIP-5
TNF-RI
Concentration (pg/mL)
Signal
Panel C
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
A1ATA1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Factor VII
Concentration (pg/mL)
Signal
Panel A
Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1α Thrombomodulin
Calibrator Conc.
Tested (pg/mL)
40000 4000 500 1000 80000 8000 80000
Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors
Spot Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1α Thrombomodulin
Angiopoietin 1 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 5.5% < 1.0% < 1.0%
Angiopoietin 2 2.3% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% 2.1% < 1.0% 3.2%
ENA-78 < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
FasL < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
ICAM-3 < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0%
SDF-1α 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% < 1.0% 5.2% 100% < 1.0%
Thrombomodulin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100%
Panel B
Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII
Calibrator Conc.
Tested (pg/mL)
500 2500 25000 125000 10000 25000 2500 625
Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors
Spot Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII
Eotaxin-2 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% 1.5% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
MIP-5 < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
MMP-3 < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
MMP-9 < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
Osteoactivin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
P-Cadherin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0%
TNF-RI < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0%
TNF-RII < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100%
% Recovery = measured/expected x 100
Panel A - Urine (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1a
Thrombomodulin
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - CSF (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2
0
50
100
150
200
250
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1a
Thrombomodulin
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1a
Thrombomodulin
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - Serum (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - Urine (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - CSF (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - Serum (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - Urine (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - CSF (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - Serum (n=6)
Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - Urine (n=6)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - CSF (n=6)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
50
100
150
200
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - Urine (n=6)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - CSF (n=6)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - Urine (n=6)
0 4000 8000 12000 16000
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - CSF (n=6)
0 4000 8000 12000 16000
0
50
100
150
200
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
50
100
150
200
250
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel A - Serum (n=6)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
50
100
150
200
Angiopoietin 1
Angiopoietin 2
ENA-78
FasL
ICAM-3
SDF-1
Thrombomodulin
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel B - Serum (n=6)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
50
100
150
200
Eotaxin-2
MIP-5
MMP-3
MMP-9
Osteoactivin
P-Cadherin
TNF-RI
TNF-RII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - EDTA Plasma (n=6)
0 4000 8000 12000 16000
0
50
100
150
200
250
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel C - Serum (n=6)
0 4000 8000 12000 16000
0
50
100
150
200
250
A1AT
Adiponectin
B2M
Clusterin
Cystatin-C
Factor VII
Fold Dilution
%AverageRecovery
Panel C
A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII
Calibrator Conc.
Tested (pg/mL)
50000 6667 539 66667 13333 568
Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors
Spot A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII
A1AT 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
Adiponectin < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0%
B2M < 1.0% 1.9% 100% < 1.0% 1.5% < 1.0%
Clusterin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0%
Cystatin-C < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0%
Factor VII 7.3% 2.7% < 1.0% 3.6% 2.5% 100%
6 Specificity
Panel A Panel B
Spike Concentration Spike Concentration
Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units
Angiopoietin 1 40.0 1.60 0.06 ng/mL Eotaxin-2 500 31.3 1.95 pg/mL
Angiopoietin 2 4000 160 6.40 pg/mL MIP-5 2.50 0.16 0.01 ng/mL
ENA-78 500 20.0 0.80 pg/mL MMP-3 25.0 1.56 0.10 ng/mL
FasL 1000 40.0 1.60 pg/mL MMP-9 125 7.81 0.49 ng/mL
ICAM-3 80.0 3.20 0.13 ng/mL Osteoactivin 10.0 0.63 0.04 ng/mL
SDF-1α 8000 320 12.8 pg/mL P-Cadherin 25.0 1.56 0.10 ng/mL
Thrombomodulin 80.0 3.20 0.13 ng/mL TNF-RI 2.50 0.16 0.01 ng/mL
TNF-RII 625 39.1 2.44 pg/mL
Panel C
Spike Concentration
Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units
A1AT 50.0 5.56 0.62 ng/mL
Adiponectin 6670 741 82.3 pg/mL
B2M 539 59.9 6.65 pg/mL
Clusterin 66.7 7.41 0.82 ng/mL
Cystatin-C 13.3 1.48 0.17 ng/mL
Factor VII 568 63.1 7.01 pg/mL
Assay Panel Dilution Median LLOD Median ULOD Units
A1AT C 4000 0.02 600 µg/mL
Adiponectin C 4000 17.3 80000 ng/mL
Angiopoietin 1 A 2 0.04 200 ng/mL
Angiopoietin 2 A 2 5.30 20000 pg/mL
B2M C 4000 22.5 6464 ng/mL
Clusterin C 4000 0.10 800 µg/mL
Cystatin-C C 4000 0.23 160 µg/mL
ENA-78 A 2 1.83 2500 pg/mL
Eotaxin-2 B 10 8.17 20000 pg/mL
Factor VII C 4000 15.1 6816 ng/mL
FasL A 2 0.57 5000 pg/mL
ICAM-3 A 2 0.01 400 ng/mL
MIP-5 B 10 0.01 100 ng/mL
MMP-3 B 10 0.02 1000 ng/mL
MMP-9 B 10 0.20 5000 ng/mL
Osteoactivin B 10 0.05 400 ng/mL
P-Cadherin B 10 0.23 1000 ng/mL
SDF-1α A 2 438 40000 pg/mL
Thrombomodulin A 2 0.01 400 ng/mL
TNF-RI B 10 0.15 100 ng/mL
TNF-RII B 10 1.77 25000 pg/mL
%Non − specificity =
𝐵𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙
𝐵𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙
∗ 100
Typical U-PLEX Protocol
Create U-PLEX Coating Solution:
• Dilute each biotinylated antibody to 10 µg/mL in coating diluent.
• Add 200 µL of each biotinylated antibody to 300 µL of the
assigned linker. Vortex. Incubate at room temperature (RT) for
30 minutes.
• Add 200 µL of Stop Solution. Vortex. Incubate at RT for 30
minutes.
• Combine 600 µL of each U-PLEX-coupled antibody solution into
a single tube and vortex. Up to 10 U-PLEX-coupled antibodies
can be pooled.
Coat U-PLEX Plate:
• Add 50 µL of multiplex coating solution to each well. Seal plate
with an adhesive plate seal and incubate at RT with shaking for 1
hour or overnight.
• Wash plate 3 times with at least 150 µL/well of PBS-T or MSD®
Wash Buffer.
Complete (Run Assay):
• Add 50 µL of sample, calibrator, or control to each well; shake
for 1 hr and wash.
• Add 50 µL of detection antibody solution to each well; shake for
1 hr and wash.
• Add 150 µL of 2X Read Buffer T to each well and read.
Panel A
A
ngiopoietin
1A
ngiopoietin
2
EN
A
-78
FasL
IC
A
M
-3

SD
F-1Throm
bom
odulin
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Concentration
Detection Limits
Serum (N=6)
EDTA Plasma (N=6)
Urine (N=6)
CSF (N=6)
Panel B
Eotaxin-2
M
IP-5
M
M
P-3
M
M
P-9O
steoactivin
P-C
adherin
TN
F-R
I
TN
F-R
II
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Concentration
Detection Limits
Serum (N=6)
EDTA Plasma (N=6)
Urine (N=6)
CSF (N=6)
Panel C
A
1A
T
A
diponectin
B
2M
C
lusterin
C
ystatin-C
FactorVII
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Concentration
Detection Limits
Serum (N=6)
EDTA Plasma (N=6)
Urine (N=6)
CSF (N=6)

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假
160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假
160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假Chaoli Lee
 
Alfabeto de nomes z
Alfabeto de nomes   zAlfabeto de nomes   z
Alfabeto de nomes zDário Reis
 
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre 2015
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre  2015Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre  2015
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre 2015Alcaldia Asermanuevo
 
Alfabeto de nomes u
Alfabeto de nomes   uAlfabeto de nomes   u
Alfabeto de nomes uDário Reis
 
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX Development
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX DevelopmentECI_Lu_U-PLEX Development
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX DevelopmentLawrence Hwang
 
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainer
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainerEx 403 parts 1+2 trainer
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainerAlicia Pussacq
 
w-o summary 10-27-15
w-o summary 10-27-15w-o summary 10-27-15
w-o summary 10-27-15Bill Moran
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Airmule
AirmuleAirmule
Airmule
 
160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假
160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假
160706黃國昌衛環委員會質詢-一例一休vs兩天例假
 
Brincar
BrincarBrincar
Brincar
 
Alfabeto de nomes z
Alfabeto de nomes   zAlfabeto de nomes   z
Alfabeto de nomes z
 
DRI_StackedLogo
DRI_StackedLogoDRI_StackedLogo
DRI_StackedLogo
 
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre 2015
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre  2015Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre  2015
Auditoria especial plan anticorrupcion corte diciembre 2015
 
Android documentary app
Android documentary appAndroid documentary app
Android documentary app
 
Alfabeto de nomes u
Alfabeto de nomes   uAlfabeto de nomes   u
Alfabeto de nomes u
 
RWA prej
RWA prejRWA prej
RWA prej
 
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX Development
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX DevelopmentECI_Lu_U-PLEX Development
ECI_Lu_U-PLEX Development
 
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainer
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainerEx 403 parts 1+2 trainer
Ex 403 parts 1+2 trainer
 
w-o summary 10-27-15
w-o summary 10-27-15w-o summary 10-27-15
w-o summary 10-27-15
 
La comunicacion medico paciente Servimedia
La comunicacion medico paciente ServimediaLa comunicacion medico paciente Servimedia
La comunicacion medico paciente Servimedia
 
#MAForum en cincodias.com
#MAForum en cincodias.com#MAForum en cincodias.com
#MAForum en cincodias.com
 

Similar to Rapid development of 21 biomarker assays on MSD's U-PLEX platform

6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final
6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final
6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_finalLawrence Hwang
 
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEW
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEWMSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEW
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEWLawrence Hwang
 
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...Thermo Fisher Scientific
 
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panels
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panelsDevelopment and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panels
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panelsNathan Jorgensen
 
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820Peter Tidswell
 
Validation of bevacizumab elisa ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03
Validation of bevacizumab elisa   ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03Validation of bevacizumab elisa   ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03
Validation of bevacizumab elisa ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03krishgen
 
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10Thermo Fisher Scientific
 
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...Quality Assistance s.a.
 
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...Rajarshi Guha
 
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...Saw Yi
 
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentation
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentationAsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentation
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentationAndrew Bieberich
 
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...University of Calgary
 
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory Perspective
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory PerspectiveUnderstanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory Perspective
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory PerspectiveDr. Ishaq B Mohammed
 
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MS
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MSQuantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MS
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MSCovance
 
L25 b met_complete_blood_count
L25 b met_complete_blood_countL25 b met_complete_blood_count
L25 b met_complete_blood_countShakeel Mujahid
 
Validation for immunoassay
Validation for immunoassayValidation for immunoassay
Validation for immunoassayDHINESHKUMAR V
 
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNA
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNAGenomica - Microarreglos de DNA
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNAUlises Urzua
 

Similar to Rapid development of 21 biomarker assays on MSD's U-PLEX platform (20)

6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final
6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final
6-8-2015 AACC Poster HIV p24 S-PLEX - Stengelin_final
 
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEW
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEWMSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEW
MSD Poster Tau CTAD_MARS_REVIEW
 
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...
Development of Quality Control Materials for Characterization of Comprehensiv...
 
Khushbu_Simoa_06-16
Khushbu_Simoa_06-16Khushbu_Simoa_06-16
Khushbu_Simoa_06-16
 
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panels
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panelsDevelopment and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panels
Development and evaluation of in silico toxicity screening panels
 
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820
Journal Combinatorial Chemistry 2006 v8 p820
 
Validation of bevacizumab elisa ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03
Validation of bevacizumab elisa   ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03Validation of bevacizumab elisa   ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03
Validation of bevacizumab elisa ich q2 ver3,0 dt14.03
 
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10
Pharmacogenomics Research Ion AmpliSeq Assay | ESHG 2015 Poster PM15.10
 
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...
WEBINAR Characterisation of human pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and IPSC) and ...
 
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...
Exploring Compound Combinations in High Throughput Settings: Going Beyond 1D ...
 
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...
Selection and application of ssDNA aptamers to detect active TB from sputum s...
 
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentation
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentationAsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentation
AsedaSciences SLAS2017 poster presentation
 
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...
Characterizing the Complex Lipidic Composition of Small Extracellular Vesicle...
 
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory Perspective
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory PerspectiveUnderstanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory Perspective
Understanding Bioanalytical Method Validation in a Regulatory Perspective
 
Cell based Assays
Cell based AssaysCell based Assays
Cell based Assays
 
Presentation 6
Presentation 6Presentation 6
Presentation 6
 
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MS
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MSQuantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MS
Quantification of a Novel Peptide, CPT31 in Rat and Monkey Plasma by LC-MS
 
L25 b met_complete_blood_count
L25 b met_complete_blood_countL25 b met_complete_blood_count
L25 b met_complete_blood_count
 
Validation for immunoassay
Validation for immunoassayValidation for immunoassay
Validation for immunoassay
 
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNA
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNAGenomica - Microarreglos de DNA
Genomica - Microarreglos de DNA
 

Rapid development of 21 biomarker assays on MSD's U-PLEX platform

  • 1. MESO SCALE DISCOVERY, MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, MSD, MSD GOLD, DISCOVERY WORKBENCH, MULTI-ARRAY, MULTI-SPOT, QUICKPLEX, SECTOR, SECTOR PR, SECTOR HTS, SULFO-TAG, U-PLEX, S-PLEX, V-PLEX, STREPTAVIDIN GOLD, MESO, www.mesoscale.com, SMALL SPOT (design), 96 WELL 1, 4, 7, & 10-SPOT (designs), 384 WELL 1 & 4-SPOT (designs), MSD (design), U-PLEX (design), S-PLEX (design), V-PLEX (design), and SPOT THE DIFFERENCE are trademarks and/or service marks of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. ©2015 Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. All rights reserved. To assess dilution linearity, six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, CSF, and urine samples were tested at 4 dilution factors. The initial dilution factor was determined from the literature or measurement of a subset of samples. The selected sample dilution factor was set as 100% recovery. The average % recovery for most of the analytes in the samples fell between 75% and 125%. The % recovery was elevated for samples approaching the lower limit of quantification (e.g., ICAM-3 in urine samples). The graphs below show the average % recovery for each analyte at each dilution. % Recovery = (measured x dilution factor)/expected x 100 M1028 Rapid Development of Fit-for-Purpose Multiplex Panels on the U-PLEX® Assay Platform DOWNLOAD POSTER 8 Conclusion Fit-for-Purpose multiplex panels were developed for a set of 21 analytes on the U-PLEX platform. Assay feasibility was determined by testing for specificity, spike recovery, and dilution linearity. Relative sample abundance required the analytes to be separated into focused multiplex panels. The U-PLEX platform enables the easy reconfiguration of multiplex panels depending on the need. Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop more than 20 biomarker assays and assess feasibility of multiplexing. Multiplexing of biomarkers is often a challenge due to differences in analyte abundance in matrix and assay diluent requirements. This leads to the need to reconfigure panels during the early stages of assay development. The U-PLEX assay platform is designed to enable rapid and flexible creation of multiplex immunoassays using MSD’s MULTI-ARRAY® technology. Methods: The U-PLEX platform consists of 10 unique U-PLEX linkers that specifically bind to 10 distinct locations (“spots”) at the bottom of each well of a 96-well U-PLEX plate. Each U-PLEX linker has a biotin-binding domain that couples to a biotinylated capture reagent as well as a domain that binds to its corresponding spot on the plate. Antibody pairs were screened on the U-PLEX platform, followed by measurement of analyte levels in serum, plasma, urine, and CSF. The assays were reconfigured into fit-for-purpose assay panels, and then assessed for specificity and matrix tolerance. Results: Based on the initial assessments of analyte abundance and assay specificity, the assays were configured as several multiplex panels. In the initial assessment, the assay dynamic ranges spanned 3-5 orders of magnitude. However, the samples still required dilutions between 2- and 4000-fold. In addition, improved matrix tolerance was achieved for some assays through use of different assay diluents. Based on these criteria, we were able to group the assays into preliminary multiplex panels in less than one week. Dilution linearity and spike recovery studies demonstrated acceptable matrix tolerance and accurate quantification for most of the assays tested across all matrices (typically between 75-125%). For assays that did not meet these criteria, further assay development or rescreening of antibodies could be performed. The analytes in the final panels typically exhibited non-specific binding of less than 1.0%. Fit-for-purpose panels were established within 3 weeks using as little as 200 µg of each antibody. Conclusion: The U-PLEX platform facilitated the rapid reconfiguration of fit-for-purpose multiplex panels, reducing assay development time. The resulting panels are suitable for use in early exploratory studies, and are primed for analytical validation. 1 Abstract MSD’s electrochemiluminescence detection technology uses SULFO-TAG™ labels that emit light upon electrochemical stimulation initiated at the electrode surfaces of MULTI-ARRAY and MULTI-SPOT® microplates. The U-PLEX assay platform utilizes 10 unique linkers that specifically bind to individual spots enabling simple and flexible creation of multiplex immunoassays. 2 Methods Electrochemiluminescence Technology • Minimal non-specific background and strong responses to analyte yield high signal-to-background ratios. • The stimulation mechanism (electricity) is decoupled from the response (light signal), minimizing matrix interference. • Only labels bound near the electrode surface are excited, enabling non-washed assays. • Labels are stable, non-radioactive, and directly conjugated to biological molecules. • Emission at ~620 nm eliminates problems with color quenching. • Multiple rounds of label excitation and emission enhance light levels and improve sensitivity. • Carbon electrode surface has 10X greater binding capacity than polystyrene wells. Six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, CSF, and urine samples were spiked with calibrators at multiple levels throughout the linear range of the assay. Spikes were made into neat or diluted samples; the selected dilution factor was determined from the dilution linearity. Most of the analytes recovered between 75% and 125% at each spike level. For Panel A, under-recovery was observed for several analytes; further diluent optimization is recommended for these analytes. The graphs below show the average % recovery for each analyte at each spike level. 5 Spike Recovery To determine the specificity of the detection antibodies, blended calibrators were tested with each detection antibody. The non-specific interactions were below 1.0% for most analytes. 4 Dilution Linearity Danielle Russell, Jennifer Lewis, Emily Spang, Pankaj Oberoi, and Jacob N. Wohlstadter Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, Maryland, USA NBC-15-504-TN-MM/YY Six normal human serum, EDTA plasma, urine, and CSF samples were tested across all three multiplex panels. The majority of samples measured above the lower limit of detection (LLOD). The table below provides the limits of detection and the concentration units for different assays. The LLOD is a calculated concentration based on a signal that is 2.5 standard deviations over the blank. The median LLOD is calculated over 6 runs. The upper limit of detection (ULOD) is the highest calibrator concentration. Detection limits are reported at their dilution-adjusted concentration. 7 Sample Testing Antibodies were screened and selected (data not shown). The final capture and detection antibodies were conjugated to biotin and SULFO-TAG, respectively. Performance of each assay was confirmed by testing standard curves. A set of 21 assays was grouped into 3 preliminary multiplex panels; reagents and groupings were determined based on abundance levels. The standard curves shown below and to the right illustrate the sensitivity and dynamic range of the 21 assays in the U-PLEX feasibility study. The graphs display representative data from a single run. 3 Antibodies and Reagents Selected Panel A 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000 Angiopoietin 1Angiopoietin 1 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL Thrombomodulin Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL SDF-1 Thrombomodulin ICAM-3ICAM-3 SDF-1 Concentration (pg/mL) Signal Panel B 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000 Eotaxin-2 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RII Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin TNF-RII TNF-RI P-Cadherin 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 MIP-5 TNF-RI Concentration (pg/mL) Signal Panel C 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000 A1ATA1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Factor VII Concentration (pg/mL) Signal Panel A Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1α Thrombomodulin Calibrator Conc. Tested (pg/mL) 40000 4000 500 1000 80000 8000 80000 Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors Spot Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1α Thrombomodulin Angiopoietin 1 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 5.5% < 1.0% < 1.0% Angiopoietin 2 2.3% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% 2.1% < 1.0% 3.2% ENA-78 < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% FasL < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% ICAM-3 < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% SDF-1α 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% < 1.0% 5.2% 100% < 1.0% Thrombomodulin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% Panel B Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Calibrator Conc. Tested (pg/mL) 500 2500 25000 125000 10000 25000 2500 625 Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors Spot Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Eotaxin-2 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% 1.5% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% MIP-5 < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% MMP-3 < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% MMP-9 < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% Osteoactivin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% P-Cadherin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% TNF-RI < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% TNF-RII < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% % Recovery = measured/expected x 100 Panel A - Urine (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1a Thrombomodulin %AverageRecovery Panel A - CSF (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 0 50 100 150 200 250 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1a Thrombomodulin %AverageRecovery Panel A - EDTA Plasma (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1a Thrombomodulin %AverageRecovery Panel A - Serum (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1 Thrombomodulin %AverageRecovery Panel B - Urine (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII %AverageRecovery Panel B - CSF (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII %AverageRecovery Panel B - EDTA Plasma (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII %AverageRecovery Panel B - Serum (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII %AverageRecovery Panel C - Urine (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII %AverageRecovery Panel C - CSF (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII %AverageRecovery Panel C - EDTA Plasma (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII %AverageRecovery Panel C - Serum (n=6) Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII %AverageRecovery Panel A - Urine (n=6) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1 Thrombomodulin Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel A - CSF (n=6) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1 Thrombomodulin Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel B - Urine (n=6) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel B - CSF (n=6) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel C - Urine (n=6) 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel C - CSF (n=6) 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 0 50 100 150 200 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel A - EDTA Plasma (n=6) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1 Thrombomodulin Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel A - Serum (n=6) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 Angiopoietin 1 Angiopoietin 2 ENA-78 FasL ICAM-3 SDF-1 Thrombomodulin Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel B - EDTA Plasma (n=6) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel B - Serum (n=6) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200 Eotaxin-2 MIP-5 MMP-3 MMP-9 Osteoactivin P-Cadherin TNF-RI TNF-RII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel C - EDTA Plasma (n=6) 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 0 50 100 150 200 250 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel C - Serum (n=6) 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 0 50 100 150 200 250 A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII Fold Dilution %AverageRecovery Panel C A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII Calibrator Conc. Tested (pg/mL) 50000 6667 539 66667 13333 568 Blended Calibrator with Individual Detectors Spot A1AT Adiponectin B2M Clusterin Cystatin-C Factor VII A1AT 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% Adiponectin < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% B2M < 1.0% 1.9% 100% < 1.0% 1.5% < 1.0% Clusterin < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% < 1.0% Cystatin-C < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% < 1.0% 100% < 1.0% Factor VII 7.3% 2.7% < 1.0% 3.6% 2.5% 100% 6 Specificity Panel A Panel B Spike Concentration Spike Concentration Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units Angiopoietin 1 40.0 1.60 0.06 ng/mL Eotaxin-2 500 31.3 1.95 pg/mL Angiopoietin 2 4000 160 6.40 pg/mL MIP-5 2.50 0.16 0.01 ng/mL ENA-78 500 20.0 0.80 pg/mL MMP-3 25.0 1.56 0.10 ng/mL FasL 1000 40.0 1.60 pg/mL MMP-9 125 7.81 0.49 ng/mL ICAM-3 80.0 3.20 0.13 ng/mL Osteoactivin 10.0 0.63 0.04 ng/mL SDF-1α 8000 320 12.8 pg/mL P-Cadherin 25.0 1.56 0.10 ng/mL Thrombomodulin 80.0 3.20 0.13 ng/mL TNF-RI 2.50 0.16 0.01 ng/mL TNF-RII 625 39.1 2.44 pg/mL Panel C Spike Concentration Spot Spike-1 Spike-2 Spike-3 Units A1AT 50.0 5.56 0.62 ng/mL Adiponectin 6670 741 82.3 pg/mL B2M 539 59.9 6.65 pg/mL Clusterin 66.7 7.41 0.82 ng/mL Cystatin-C 13.3 1.48 0.17 ng/mL Factor VII 568 63.1 7.01 pg/mL Assay Panel Dilution Median LLOD Median ULOD Units A1AT C 4000 0.02 600 µg/mL Adiponectin C 4000 17.3 80000 ng/mL Angiopoietin 1 A 2 0.04 200 ng/mL Angiopoietin 2 A 2 5.30 20000 pg/mL B2M C 4000 22.5 6464 ng/mL Clusterin C 4000 0.10 800 µg/mL Cystatin-C C 4000 0.23 160 µg/mL ENA-78 A 2 1.83 2500 pg/mL Eotaxin-2 B 10 8.17 20000 pg/mL Factor VII C 4000 15.1 6816 ng/mL FasL A 2 0.57 5000 pg/mL ICAM-3 A 2 0.01 400 ng/mL MIP-5 B 10 0.01 100 ng/mL MMP-3 B 10 0.02 1000 ng/mL MMP-9 B 10 0.20 5000 ng/mL Osteoactivin B 10 0.05 400 ng/mL P-Cadherin B 10 0.23 1000 ng/mL SDF-1α A 2 438 40000 pg/mL Thrombomodulin A 2 0.01 400 ng/mL TNF-RI B 10 0.15 100 ng/mL TNF-RII B 10 1.77 25000 pg/mL %Non − specificity = 𝐵𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙 ∗ 100 Typical U-PLEX Protocol Create U-PLEX Coating Solution: • Dilute each biotinylated antibody to 10 µg/mL in coating diluent. • Add 200 µL of each biotinylated antibody to 300 µL of the assigned linker. Vortex. Incubate at room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes. • Add 200 µL of Stop Solution. Vortex. Incubate at RT for 30 minutes. • Combine 600 µL of each U-PLEX-coupled antibody solution into a single tube and vortex. Up to 10 U-PLEX-coupled antibodies can be pooled. Coat U-PLEX Plate: • Add 50 µL of multiplex coating solution to each well. Seal plate with an adhesive plate seal and incubate at RT with shaking for 1 hour or overnight. • Wash plate 3 times with at least 150 µL/well of PBS-T or MSD® Wash Buffer. Complete (Run Assay): • Add 50 µL of sample, calibrator, or control to each well; shake for 1 hr and wash. • Add 50 µL of detection antibody solution to each well; shake for 1 hr and wash. • Add 150 µL of 2X Read Buffer T to each well and read. Panel A A ngiopoietin 1A ngiopoietin 2 EN A -78 FasL IC A M -3  SD F-1Throm bom odulin 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Concentration Detection Limits Serum (N=6) EDTA Plasma (N=6) Urine (N=6) CSF (N=6) Panel B Eotaxin-2 M IP-5 M M P-3 M M P-9O steoactivin P-C adherin TN F-R I TN F-R II 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Concentration Detection Limits Serum (N=6) EDTA Plasma (N=6) Urine (N=6) CSF (N=6) Panel C A 1A T A diponectin B 2M C lusterin C ystatin-C FactorVII 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Concentration Detection Limits Serum (N=6) EDTA Plasma (N=6) Urine (N=6) CSF (N=6)