Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Paganucci E-Poster
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Paganucci E-Poster

537
views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
537
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Teaching Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Higher Education: Potential Solutions to Barriers Hindering Effective Implementation
    Laura Paganucci
    English 820
    25 April 2011
  • 2. The Problem
    Need:
    Research and professional environments require interdisciplinary work, academia must prepare students for this environment
    Problem:
    The success of interdisciplinary work and collaboration relies on numerous concepts and skills (Morse et al.; Newell 15)
    Interdisciplinary education is a priority in post-secondary academia but successful integration is not yet widely achieved (Mansilla et al. 334; Morse et al.)
    Argument:
    Incorporation of interdisciplinary education faces barriers:
    basic departmental and programmatic restrictions
    issues with course design and implementation
    difficulty defining interdisciplinarity for assessment purposes
    Successful integration can be accomplished by researching, addressing, exploiting, and resolving these barriers
  • 3. What is Interdisciplinarity?
    The interdisciplinary individual:
    “Capacity to integrate knowledge and modes of thinking in two or more disciplines or established areas of expertise to produce a cognitive advancement” (Mansilla et al. 337).
    Skills include: define a problem; gather relevant disciplinary knowledge; study with varied perspectives; generate disciplinary insights; identify conflicts and find common ground between disciplinary knowledge; construct/test new models (Newell 15)
    The Interdisciplinary collaboration:
    “Process of coordinated, collaborative, or combined inquiry into a common problem with sharing, creation, and synthesis of knowledge among disciplines and researchers” (Morse et al. 2).
    Skills: Personal accountability, dedication, creativity, flexibility, and patience (Morse et al.); appropriately determine disciplinary representatives and consultants; coordinate development of aims and methodology; decide on common vocabulary; communication; integrate all relevant information (Klein, “Interdisciplinarity” 188)
  • 4. Pedagogical Design
    Unit:
    Grant writing unit
    Purpose:
    Introduce type of scientific writing
    Formally address factors that aid and hinder interdisciplinary work and collaboration at the individual and disciplinary levels
    Scientific Writing:
    Accomplished by writing practice and formal introduction to the style, form, and function of a grant proposal
    Interdisciplinary work and collaboration:
    Lectures and discussions focused on interdisciplinary skills and concepts; experience in group based projects; opportunities to write and discuss reflective essays
  • 5. Barriers to Implementation
    ISWC pedagogical design is successful because it addresses, exploits, and resolves the following barriers:
    basic departmental and programmatic restrictions
    issues with course design and implementation
    difficulty defining interdisciplinarity for assessment purposes
  • 6. Barrier 1: Basic Mechanics
    Basic departmental and programmatic restrictions:
    time, credit, and exam constraints, funding, lack of experience, and discipline based mentalities (Morse et al.)
    Pedagogical solutions:
    Change or modify existing classes
    Alleviates time, credit, exam constraints
    Grant writing unit modifies a scientific writing unit to include interdisciplinary concepts
    Access funding sources
    Grant writing unit/course seeks NSF funding as part of an interdisciplinary curriculum
    Education and promotion
    Alleviates experience and disciplinary mentality
    Successful implementation and publication of grant writing course will convey methodology and improve acceptance of interdisciplinary training
  • 7. Barrier 2: Course Design
    Issues with course design and effective implementation:
    Interdisciplinarityis complex, skills can not be simply added to a course
    Interdisciplinarity is best learned through the reconstruction of the content and method of teaching (Klein “Platform” 16)
    Reconstruction can be problematic
    Pedagogical solutions:
    Take existing topic areas and redesign the syllabus, integrating interdisciplinarity
    Grant writing unit allows students to integrate information from two or more disciplines to study a common theme at the personal and collaborative levels
    Students ground their own disciplinary knowledge, learn new methodologies, terminology, and problem solving strategies
    Lectures and discussions focused on collaborative themes encourage students to engage interdisciplinary concepts
  • 8. Barrier 3: Assessment
    Poor assessment methods:
    Interdisciplinarityis complex, difficult to define, comprised of intangible skills; makes assessment difficult (Stowe and Eder 83)
    Student grades and opinion surveys used for assessment bypass characteristics that define interdisciplinary achievement such as purposefulness, disciplinary grounding, integration, and critical awareness (Mansilla et al.)
    Resulting lack of information regarding student, course, and programmatic outcomes prevents further incorporation, growth, and improvement of interdisciplinary studies (Mansilla et al. 335)
    Pedagogical solutions:
    A rubric allows increased consistency in grading, ability for students to judge their own work and understand areas of improvement, and can continuously evolve to better serve the student, course and program
    A rubric enables the use of different methods of data collection, varied instruments and techniques, and the incorporation of a variety of models to develop interdisciplinary assessments.
  • 9. Conclusion
    Successful and effective interdisciplinary education is possible
    Departmental and programmatic barriers are overcome with compromise, modification of existing courses, and education
    Courses must be carefully redesigned to incorporate interdisciplinary concepts as opposed to the simple addition of overt skill instruction
    Effective assessment is achieved by using an evolving and manipulatable system
  • 10. References
    Klein, Julie Thompson. “A Platform for a Shared Discourse of Interdisciplinary Education.” Journal of Social Science Education 5.2 (2006): 10-18. Print.
     Klein, Julie Thompson. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990. Print.
    Mansilla, Veronica Boix, Elizabeth Dawes Duraisingh, Christopher R. Wolfe, Carolyn Haynes. “Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing.” The Journal of Higher Education 80.3 (2009): 334- 353. Print.
    Morse, Wayde Cameron, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Jo Ellen Force, and J.D. Wulfhorst. “Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research.” Ecology and Society 12.2 (2007). Web. 20 January 2011.
    Newell, William. “A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies.” Issues in Integrative Studies19 (2001): 1-25. Print.
    Stowe, Donald E., Douglas J. Eder. “Interdisciplinary Program Assessment.” Issues in Integrative Studies 20 (2002): 77-101. Print.