Negotiation Strategy and Planning [Sav Lecture]
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Negotiation Strategy and Planning [Sav Lecture]

on

  • 17,133 views

Lecture slides to accompany Negotiation Strategy and Planning class.

Lecture slides to accompany Negotiation Strategy and Planning class.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
17,133
Views on SlideShare
16,867
Embed Views
266

Actions

Likes
8
Downloads
621
Comments
2

7 Embeds 266

http://academiadeinfluenciadigital.blogspot.com 213
http://www.slideshare.net 36
http://academiadeinfluenciadigital.blogspot.mx 12
http://www.academiadeinfluenciadigital.blogspot.com 2
https://myasucourses.asu.edu 1
http://academiadeinfluenciadigital.blogspot.no 1
http://academiadeinfluenciadigital.blogspot.sg 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • Hello I like the way that the process is outlined and would really appreciate it if I could utilize so of it for an up and coming workshop
    email - siancelcia@hotmail.com - many thanks in advance
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • Good conceptual overview of Negotiation as an overall process and not just tactics and outcomes
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Makes us sleep better at night.
  • 1 ContendingActors pursue own outcomes strongly, show little concern for other party obtaining their desired outcomes2 YieldingActors show little interest in whether they attain own outcomes, are quite interested in whether the other party attains their outcomes3 Inaction Actors show little interest in whether they attain own outcomes, little concern about whether the other party obtains their outcomes4 Problem solvingActors show high concern in obtaining own outcomes, as well as high concern for the other party obtaining their outcomes5 CompromisingActors show moderate concern in obtaining own outcomes, as well as moderate concern for the other party obtaining their outcomes
  • Per Dual Concerns Model, choice of strategy is reflected in the answers to two questions:How much concern do I have in achieving my desired outcomes at stake in the negotiation?How much concern do I have for the current and future quality of the relationship with the other party?Avoidance: Get what you want without having to (waste time) negotiate, maybe have far better BATNA.Competition – distributive, win-lose bargainingCollaboration – integrative, win-win negotiationAccommodation – involves an imbalance of outcomes (“I lose, you win”) Maybe compromise for the future.
  • Strategy: Provides stability, direction and continuity for our tactical behaviors. Quinn 1991.Example: Integrative strategy designed to build and maintain a productive relationship.l
  • Assignment II: Negotiation Planning Memo IIAnalyze the other partyWhy do they want what they want?How can I present my case clearly and refute the other party’s arguments?Present the issues to the other partyDefine the protocol to be followed in the negotiationWhere and when will the negotiation occur?Who will be there?What is the agenda?
  • It provides you the information to do the negotiation. Otherwise you have no arguments.

Negotiation Strategy and Planning [Sav Lecture] Presentation Transcript

  • 1. 4-1
    Negotiation Strategy
    and Planning
    Rights Reserved
  • 2. Systematic Planning
    Most negotiation outcomes are left to chance…why?
    Advance planning is overlooked:
    Time constraints
    Boring / Tedious
    Interested in Action / Doing
    The result is either no deal or suboptimal deals (winners curse, leave value on the table for one or both parties)
    Were not as quick, smart or clever as we think we may be.
    Results are failed or suboptimal negotiations:
    Lack of clear objectives
    Inability to evaluate offers accurately
    Inability to understand alternative proposal strengths & weakness
  • 3. Use of Planning
    Research suggests (Rackham, 1980) that “skilled negotiators” vs. “average negotiators”:
    Explored a wider range of options for action
    Worked harder to find “common ground” with the other party
    Spent more time considering long term implications
    Thus, the skilled negotiators were able to understand fully when to accept, reject or continue negotiating.
    Were significantly more likely to set:
    Upper limits, Lower limits
    Understand the negotiating range of acceptable settlements
  • 4. Key Steps to an Ideal Negotiation Process
    Negotiation proceeds through distinct phases or stages:
    Beginning phase (planning, initiation)
    Middle phase (negotiation, problem solving)
    Ending phase (resolution)
  • 5. Key Steps to anIdeal Negotiation Process
    4-5
    P1, P2 & P3
    Preparation
    What are the goals?
    How will I work with the other party?
    Relationship building
    Understanding differences and similarities
    Building commitment toward a mutually beneficial set of outcomes
    Information gathering
    Learn what you need to know about the issues (Eg.. Range [ZOPA] from Baker-Andersen)
  • 6. Key Steps to anIdeal Negotiation Process
    P4, P5, P6 & P7
    Information using
    Assemble your case/argument
    Bidding, Trading: The Dance.
    Each party states their “opening offer”
    Each party engages in “give and take”
    Closing the deal
    Build commitment, step-by-step.
    Implementing the agreement (who, what, when)
  • 7. Negotiation:
    Most refer to it is simply step’s 5 & 6:
    Skilled negotiators employ all 7 steps.
  • 8. Questions???
  • 9. Goals, Strategy and Planning
    A review of the whole negotiation process…
  • 10. Goals
  • 11. Goals
    Types of Goals
    Need to be Specific, Measurable, Easy to Communicate.
    May be Win-Win or Win Loose, depending on your situation.
    E.g.
    A Cheap Car? Vs.
    New car 5 below dealer cost
    Better sales results vs.
    Sales growth 5% better than the industry growth rate.
    Substantive Goals
    Money
    Specific Outcome
    Result or Behavior Change
    Intangible Goals
    Reputation (maintain or create)
    Winning Market Entry
    Selling your company(any price)
    Procedural goals
    Agenda, Location, Law, Input in outcome
  • 12. Goals – The Focus That Drives Negotiation Strategy
    Determining goals is the first step in the negotiation process
    Negotiators should specify goals and objectives clearly -prioritized
    The goals set have direct and indirect effects on the negotiator’s strategy.
    E.g. Money $$$ or a Specific Action/Outcome
    Process goals, dates, timing
    Reputation and Relationship.
  • 13. Strategy
  • 14. Strategic Options
    4-14
    Per Dual Concerns Model, choice of strategy is reflected in the answers to two questions:
    How much concern do I have in achieving my desired outcomes at stake in the negotiation?
    How much concern do I have for the current and future quality of the relationship with the other party?
    r
  • 15. Strategy: The Dual Concerns Model - Modified
    Integrative Strategy
    Compromising
    Distributive, Win –Loose Strategy
    No Deal, I Have a better BATNA
    Accommodation: I let you win, enhance relationship: Compromise for Future?
  • 16. Dual Concerns Model
  • 17. Strategy versus Tactics
    Strategy:The overall plan to achieve one’s goals in a negotiation based on situation and resources available
    Tactics:Short-term, actions designed to enact or pursue broad strategies
    Tactics are subordinate & driven by strategy
    Planning:The “mapping” component of the strategy process
    Example: Integrative strategy designed to build and maintain a productive relationship, & create the most value between the two.
    Example: Open –ended questions, active listening to understand others genuine interests, problem solving or hard ball actions
    Example: How will I implement the strategy?
  • 18. Planning
  • 19. Getting Ready to Implement the Strategy: The Planning Process
    Define the issues
    Assemble the issues and define the bargaining mix
    The bargaining mix is the combined list of issues
    Define your interests
    Why you want what you want
    Know your limits and alternatives
    Set your objectives (targets) and opening bids (where to start)
    Target is the outcome realistically expected
    Opening is the best that can be achieved
    Assess constituents and the social context of the negotiation
  • 20. Negotiating Planning Guide
    Lewecki Text Chapter 4, Figure 4.3
  • 21. 4-21
    The Social Context of Negotiation: “Field” Analysis
    ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
    McGraw-Hill/Irwin
  • 22. Getting Ready to Implement the Strategy: The Planning Process
    4-22
    Analyze the other party
    Why do they want what they want?
    How can I present my case clearly and refute the other party’s arguments?
    Present the issues to the other party
    ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
    McGraw-Hill/Irwin
  • 23. 4-23
    Getting Ready to Implement the Strategy: The Planning Process
    Define the protocol to be followed in the negotiation
    Where and when will the negotiation occur?
    Who will be there?
    What is the agenda?
    ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
    McGraw-Hill/Irwin
  • 24. Summary on the Planning Process
    “...planning is the most important activity in negotiation.”
    It provides you the information to do the negotiation. Otherwise you have no arguments.