Leonard Transportation     Center Forum:For Whom the Road Shall         Toll? TRANSPORTATION    MATTERS       May 2008    ...
The Starting Pointwhat is the goal?   My goal for transportation is      to reduce the effects of  distance as an inhibiti...
A thought on goals!If your transportation  goals can be met by  everyone staying home  you have the wrong  goals!
ITS ALL ABOUT FINANCE TODAY !FINANCE          FINANCE                    FINANCEFINANCE
FINANCE
A PLANFINANCE
VISIONA PLANFINANCE
CREDIBILITY  VISION  A PLAN FINANCE
CREDIBILITY  VISION  A PLAN FINANCE
Maybe it was easier then ! THE INTERSTATE ERACREDIBILITY    MacDonald,               Fairbank, Turner  VISION       Toll R...
MY VISION: 3 Trendswill define the future1. Replacing the Baby-boomers –   where will our workforce come   from?2. Expandi...
In This New World the GreatIssue Will Be Skilled Workers Finding skilled workers will be the key concern of business. They...
Work Force Issues Older workers in labor force Even more females in labor force Even more variable schedules Work hours – ...
THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTLocation, Amenities, FlexibilityThe increases in services in the economy willpermit more popula...
2000 commuting patterns showthe importance of regionalflows
Li    vi Li       ng vi                   n            in g               C in                   C CLi Liv               w...
An Affluent Society Growth GDP 3%; Pop 1% = WEALTH                         Annual Trips/hh                            60  ...
TRANSPORTATION’S ROLE Transportation services should   not impede, but maybe actually   abet/enhance, the prospect   of th...
CONGESTION = WHEN DEMANDEXCEEDS CAPACITY
WHAT IS CONGESTION ?Congestion is:People with the economicmeans to act on their socialand economic interests -getting in t...
The great loss from congestion is notthe extra three minutes it takes to gethome each night     HOUSEHOLDS              BU...
Three Significant Responses Texas – GBC voted to focus on congestion to maintain economic competitiveness; Gov’r agreed Ge...
Common Threads – Stimulus “Something has to be done!”   Economic threat   Irate Citizenry In all cases genesis came from o...
Common Threads – Institutions No Ownership of problem! Dozens of Players (Seattle >100) Zero transparency – the public has...
Common Threads – Finance Planning/Programming/Finance disconnect Congestion evaluation weight 11% in Atlanta; part of 4th ...
The Policy Conflict    Neighborhood       Globally Integrated  Shorter trips         Longer trips  Walk/bike             B...
My Take away – 1Set targets and monitor:  A TTI of 120 in Texas  A TTI of 135 in Atlanta  A 15-20% reduction of congestion...
My Take away – 2 Process is dysfunctional and disinterested in the problem No accountability Planning process is as much t...
Infrastructure Issues A relatively more operable future; but:   Immense Backlog   Retrofitting the System   Interstate Rec...
THE TWO VIEWS IN TOWNTHE “TABULA          THE “CREEPING  RASA” SCHOOL       INCREMENTALISTS”  OF PUBLIC  POLICY “Isn’t it ...
THE CONFLICT “TR” School –       “CI” School – sees sees an oppt’y      a lot more proof to get things       needed! “righ...
A national conflict;Important issues remainWhat role for tolling?Who plans? How?Who sets prices? With what intent?Who gets...
The cash-cow-ification of tolls… “… transport ministers expressed diverging views on the use of revenues generated from ro...
KEY:    What happens to toll        revenues?  BEST Explicit dedication to facility  OK   General dedication to “system”  ...
What can we assume we knowabout those priced off?  Who are they? Where do they go?  What alternatives exist for them?  Wha...
The grass is always greener on theother horn of the dilemma
WHY CAN’T THERE BE AN ENDTO ALL THIS KILLIN’?WHY CAN’T THERE BE PEACE INTHE VALLEY?              Walter Brennan           ...
There could be peace in the valleyif we agreed:  #1. The gas tax and tolling concepts are  complementary.  #2. The basic g...
My financial agendaVision; Plan; FinanceDefend the highway trust fund’s role   Defend the program from further diffusion o...
WITH ALL THISWHAT WILL DRIVE REAUTHORIZATION?   A year ago – it would have been all   about international trade = FREIGHT ...
The right next stepsCredibility, Vision, Plan, Finance Win public respect and support Demonstrate a real dedication to sol...
THE TIME FOR ACTION IS PAST!
THE TIME FOR ACTION IS PAST!            Now        is the time             for    senseless bickering.         With a than...
Thank you      ALANPISARSKI           @    ALANPISARSKI.C0M      703 941-4257
LTC, Annual Forum, For Whom the Road Should Toll: The Future of Toll Roads and Road Pricing in California, 05/02/2008, Ala...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

LTC, Annual Forum, For Whom the Road Should Toll: The Future of Toll Roads and Road Pricing in California, 05/02/2008, Alan Pisarski

136

Published on

Alan E. Pisarski

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
136
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

LTC, Annual Forum, For Whom the Road Should Toll: The Future of Toll Roads and Road Pricing in California, 05/02/2008, Alan Pisarski

  1. 1. Leonard Transportation Center Forum:For Whom the Road Shall Toll? TRANSPORTATION MATTERS May 2008 Alan E. Pisarski
  2. 2. The Starting Pointwhat is the goal? My goal for transportation is to reduce the effects of distance as an inhibiting force in our society’s ability to realize its economic and social aspirations
  3. 3. A thought on goals!If your transportation goals can be met by everyone staying home you have the wrong goals!
  4. 4. ITS ALL ABOUT FINANCE TODAY !FINANCE FINANCE FINANCEFINANCE
  5. 5. FINANCE
  6. 6. A PLANFINANCE
  7. 7. VISIONA PLANFINANCE
  8. 8. CREDIBILITY VISION A PLAN FINANCE
  9. 9. CREDIBILITY VISION A PLAN FINANCE
  10. 10. Maybe it was easier then ! THE INTERSTATE ERACREDIBILITY MacDonald, Fairbank, Turner VISION Toll Roads and Free Roads A PLAN Interregional Hwys; 1944 Act FINANCE 1956 Act
  11. 11. MY VISION: 3 Trendswill define the future1. Replacing the Baby-boomers – where will our workforce come from?2. Expanding metro areas –with focus on the suburbs – the doughnut metro3. An affluent time-focused society – $50/hour and tripling of average value of goods moved
  12. 12. In This New World the GreatIssue Will Be Skilled Workers Finding skilled workers will be the key concern of business. They will go where those people are; or, go where those people want to be! States and Metro areas that can provide this resource will be big winners! Minorities, Immigrants and rural populations will be a crucial part of the work force
  13. 13. Work Force Issues Older workers in labor force Even more females in labor force Even more variable schedules Work hours – a lot like part time Skills matches – more spreading out
  14. 14. THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTLocation, Amenities, FlexibilityThe increases in services in the economy willpermit more population to act on locationpreferences as workers and employers are lesstied to resources and more attracted byamenities.Areas of the country will compete forworkers on the basis of life-style, climate,and ease of living. Good transportation willbe one of the competitive amenities.Employers will be forced to be more flexible inschedules and benefits to attract workers.
  15. 15. 2000 commuting patterns showthe importance of regionalflows
  16. 16. Li vi Li ng vi n in g C in C CLi Liv w C vi in or w ng g k or in in in k C C su in C C bu sa w w m 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 30000000 35000000 40000000 45000000 0 or ork rbs e C k of C Li in in vi su C M Li ng bu C o SA Li vi n in rb th Li vi C vi ng g in C s o MS ng in s w th A in su ub o rk M Li S vi bu urb no A ng sub r bs s, n in ur w - su bs wo ork me Li vi b w rk t ng urb ork in in C in s s C su w in C ub or bu k C u rb rb in o s N s su f ot ot No wo bu ... i t rk rb N n M in M in g s o ot SA S no .. in A M wo w n -m SA rk or k et w in g in or ki in a a C ng su C in bu a total no rb transit National commuting flows n- m et
  17. 17. An Affluent Society Growth GDP 3%; Pop 1% = WEALTH Annual Trips/hh 60 00 = IMMENSE VALUE OF 50 00 TIME will drive most 40 00 decisions including 30 00 transportation 20 00 10 00 = travelers and freight 0 will demand and be able to pay for high quality, K+ 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K 60K 70K 80K 80 reliable, amenity-based <$ - <$ - <$ - <$ - <$ - <$ - <$ - <$ K K K K K K K personalized transport 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
  18. 18. TRANSPORTATION’S ROLE Transportation services should not impede, but maybe actually abet/enhance, the prospect of that wealth occurring. GETTING US TO THE AFFLUENT SOCIETY
  19. 19. CONGESTION = WHEN DEMANDEXCEEDS CAPACITY
  20. 20. WHAT IS CONGESTION ?Congestion is:People with the economicmeans to act on their socialand economic interests -getting in the way of otherpeople with the means toact on theirs!
  21. 21. The great loss from congestion is notthe extra three minutes it takes to gethome each night HOUSEHOLDS BUSINESSES It’s the decline in It’s the decline in the number of jobs I the number of could reach in ½ hr! workers within ½ hr It’s the decline in of my employment the number of site! affordable homes It’s the decline in accessible to my the number of work! suppliers & It’s the decline in customers within ½ the assurance of hr of my business! arriving on time! It’s the decline in shipment reliability!
  22. 22. Three Significant Responses Texas – GBC voted to focus on congestion to maintain economic competitiveness; Gov’r agreed Georgia –Governor told state agencies “solve congestion now”! Washington – the State auditor conducted an audit of the State’s effectiveness in addressing congestion
  23. 23. Common Threads – Stimulus “Something has to be done!” Economic threat Irate Citizenry In all cases genesis came from outside the system – the Governor, the Legislature, or the Business Community Many of the agencies involved were reluctant participants.
  24. 24. Common Threads – Institutions No Ownership of problem! Dozens of Players (Seattle >100) Zero transparency – the public has no access to information People vs the System; Defend “The System” Interstate Commerce vs Metro Mobility
  25. 25. Common Threads – Finance Planning/Programming/Finance disconnect Congestion evaluation weight 11% in Atlanta; part of 4th element of goals in Washington) Funding locked in (zero flexibility) Donor-Donee at the county level “Sub-Area Equity”
  26. 26. The Policy Conflict Neighborhood Globally Integrated Shorter trips Longer trips Walk/bike Broad “community” Land use solutions Choices Design/Plan Market forces What’s freight? Major role for freight Accessibility Mobility Public Private Mass Personalized Change behavior Technological fix Make it happen Let it happen
  27. 27. My Take away – 1Set targets and monitor: A TTI of 120 in Texas A TTI of 135 in Atlanta A 15-20% reduction of congestion within 5 years in WashingtonUse Direct Criteria Hours of delay reduced/$ Focus on public’s benefits Performance-based programWHAT SHARE OF THE PROBLEM AM I SOLVINGWITH WHAT SHARE OF MY RESOURCES?
  28. 28. My Take away – 2 Process is dysfunctional and disinterested in the problem No accountability Planning process is as much the problem as the solution Focus and goals are elsewhere and it will probably get worse Lack of funds is just a part of it
  29. 29. Infrastructure Issues A relatively more operable future; but: Immense Backlog Retrofitting the System Interstate Reconstruction Federal Gov - an Unreliable Partner No interest in mobility On-going revenue conflicts
  30. 30. THE TWO VIEWS IN TOWNTHE “TABULA THE “CREEPING RASA” SCHOOL INCREMENTALISTS” OF PUBLIC POLICY “Isn’t it great “Where is this all that we can start leading?” over?”
  31. 31. THE CONFLICT “TR” School – “CI” School – sees sees an oppt’y a lot more proof to get things needed! “right”! A complement not HOT Lanes replacement – Leased Facilities what %? Tolls = Variable Protect present Pricing tax base System-wide Cash cow-ification tolling of tolling
  32. 32. A national conflict;Important issues remainWhat role for tolling?Who plans? How?Who sets prices? With what intent?Who gets the money? For what?Dedication vs general revenueHow determine new capacity needs?What Fed program scale 40-60%Solvency of Trust Fund
  33. 33. The cash-cow-ification of tolls… “… transport ministers expressed diverging views on the use of revenues generated from road tolls. The United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland and France would prefer to use the proceeds from road tolls as government fiscal revenue to be allocated to any sector. However, the Commission together with some Member States refuses this approach, arguing that the charging of road use is not being put in place to generate additional state revenues but to reduce congestion and negative environmental impacts.” Council meeting on 9 March 2004
  34. 34. KEY: What happens to toll revenues? BEST Explicit dedication to facility OK General dedication to “system” POOR General dedication to “transportation” BAD For general revenue purposesLOSS OF DEDICATION TO THE FACILITY DESTROYS ONE OF THE POWERFUL BENEFITS OF TOLLS/BONDING;A “CLOSED SYSTEM” BETWEEN OPERATOR/BONDHOLDERS AND USERS
  35. 35. What can we assume we knowabout those priced off? Who are they? Where do they go? What alternatives exist for them? What new costs do we impose on users? What forces do we put into play? Rewarding bad public policy –the poorer the alternatives the higher the price has to be to get people off !
  36. 36. The grass is always greener on theother horn of the dilemma
  37. 37. WHY CAN’T THERE BE AN ENDTO ALL THIS KILLIN’?WHY CAN’T THERE BE PEACE INTHE VALLEY? Walter Brennan in a scene from all of his pictures!
  38. 38. There could be peace in the valleyif we agreed: #1. The gas tax and tolling concepts are complementary. #2. The basic gas tax approach can significantly benefit from greater emphasis on tolling where the opportunities exist, often on major high level long distance facilities or where congestion is most serious. #3. Toll roads cannot do it alone. They are a very useful supplement in the road system but cannot approach meeting the basic needs of the system. #4. Protecting toll roads revenue from diversion is as important as protecting the gas tax. #5. Mechanisms need to be put in place that support the continued effectiveness and strengths of these two fundamental revenue sources.
  39. 39. My financial agendaVision; Plan; FinanceDefend the highway trust fund’s role Defend the program from further diffusion of goals and funding Defend the program from other budget “wants”Assure a supportive, rational tolling policy Assure tolls are dedicated to facility Assure tolls are revenue tools; not social engineering and not a general purpose bail-out tool that mortgages the futureRestore confidence in State and Federal Programs Focus the Federal Program When you are building transportation museums the public has the right to believe that the bridges wont fall down.
  40. 40. WITH ALL THISWHAT WILL DRIVE REAUTHORIZATION? A year ago – it would have been all about international trade = FREIGHT NOW – its all about GHG and CO2 NEXT – its all about RECESSION ??? AFTER NEXT – ELECTION/ADMIN ??? IN A YEAR -- REAL ISSUE WILL BE WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM TO WRITE A BILL
  41. 41. The right next stepsCredibility, Vision, Plan, Finance Win public respect and support Demonstrate a real dedication to solving congestion Adopt measurable performance results Accept public consumer sovereignty
  42. 42. THE TIME FOR ACTION IS PAST!
  43. 43. THE TIME FOR ACTION IS PAST! Now is the time for senseless bickering. With a thank you to the demotivators
  44. 44. Thank you ALANPISARSKI @ ALANPISARSKI.C0M 703 941-4257
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×