2008 NLADA Technology Planning For Automated Forms - Glenn Rawdon's Presentation

Document Automation 101
Document assembly software helps users answer questions and uses those answers to fill out forms, which can be printed or filed electronically.
The advantages of document assembly include
providing additional informational support to people who complete the forms,
eliminating the repeated entry of information, and
focusing a user on the information that they need to fill out the form.
The process of filling out the forms also educates the litigant on what is relevant to their claim and what should therefore be presented in court. (It is a totally appropriate role for courts to provide this service.)

What is Document Assembly? Advocates or self-represented litigants answer questions during an interview. A personalized document is created from the answers. The answers can be saved and reused.

Building a Project - Process Plan Launch Assess Develop

The Forms the Thing
Garbage in, garbage out (or good automated forms start with good paper forms)
Have the content reviewed by attorneys, judges, and potential litigants for legal problems as well as areas of potential confusion and improvement

Best Practices Minimize how many questions users have to answer. Ask And Then Calculate A birthday The person’s age A child’s birthday If the child is a minor When a tenant moved out How long ago that was A person’s gender Personal pronouns (he/she, him/her, & so on)

Standardize!
We are lucky if we have enough money to do all the forms once, much less 77 times!

Forget Lawyer Speak
Easily understood forms and interviews are better for clients, advocates, and the courts.

One Form, Two Masters
The same form can serve both pro se users and advocates by using different interviews, A2J Author for pro se, HotDocs for advocates

Think Small
You do not have to automate every form for every type of case
Prioritize – pick the forms that give you the most bang for the buck
Remember the 90% rule – a form doesn’t have to cover every possible variation, you can still edit.

Evaluating the Program
Draft an evaluation plan.
Design and test data collection instruments.
Collect baseline data.
Collect additional data.
Analyze data and report findings.
Repeat steps 4 and 5.
©2008 National Center for State Courts

Sustaining the Program
Evaluation
Partnerships
Minimized Maintenance
Creative Thinking

Lessons Learned
Plan for sustainability from the beginning.
Use standard forms that every court must accept.
Learn from other jurisdictions’ projects.
Find a “champion.”
Build support for the project.
Do not be overly ambitious.
Integrate the project into existing service delivery channels.
Train staff to use the system.
Promote the project.
Evaluate.
©2008 National Center for State Courts

Best Practices ©2008 National Center for State Courts Integrate other support systems, such as phone and “LiveHelp.” Use the content in court and community environments where help is available from supportive and knowledgeable staff.

2008 NLADA Technology Planning For Automated Forms - Glenn Rawdon's Presentation

by Legal Services National Technology Assistance Project (LSNTAP)

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

1 Embed 1

Statistics

2008 NLADA Technology Planning For Automated Forms - Glenn Rawdon’s Presentation Presentation Transcript