A2 j survey workshop  for launching 29 feb 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

A2 j survey workshop for launching 29 feb 2012

on

  • 241 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
241
Views on SlideShare
241
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

A2 j survey workshop  for launching 29 feb 2012 A2 j survey workshop for launching 29 feb 2012 Presentation Transcript

  • Survey on The People’s Perspective onAccess to Justice In Provinces in Lao PDR
  • Specific Survey Objectives: To inform the development of concrete actions for the Legal Sector Master Plan; To build upon ongoing initiatives and successes to enhance access to justice across the country; To assist in the prioritization of issues, locations and target groups for legal awareness activities and legal aid assistance; To identify the best methods for conducting legal awareness activities; To identify additional strategies, entry points and to propose
  • Public Access to, or Interaction with, JusticeSystems ; Lack of legal awareness is the main obstacle to people accessing the system; particularly formal mechanisms; ; A significant proportion of people have participated in legal awareness-raising activities and uniformly found it useful; People like participatory legal awareness activities or user-friendly media. However, they seem to prefer the source of the information to be official, albeit tailored to the local context Legal aid or assistance provision still seems to be relatively uncommon; particularly outside of Vientiane View slide
  • Public Confidence or Perception People rely on local officials for accurate information about their rights and remedies. - - Customary mechanisms are most trusted, and most used, by the public - especially women - to resolve disputes. Semi-formal or formal remedies, however, are preferred to resolve ‘external’ or ‘arm’s length’ disputes. The process and treatment of participants is almost as important as the outcome in instilling confidence in any - informal, semi-formal or formal - justice system. Public perception of the value-added by lawyers is low, but higher for free services, View slide
  • Legal Awareness Priority Issues, Locations, and TargetGroups Demand for training on ‘all relevant laws’: especially, ‘justice-related issues’, family law, and ‘rights’. - Theft, drunkenness, unfair or unequal treatment, inequitable distribution of development assistance, drug abuse, domestic or other gender-based violence, adultery, trafficking, fights, and land disputes – arise frequently, so should also be a focus. Targeted (regionally) training: e.g., human trafficking. Enhanced awareness-raising in remote areas, far from courts.
  • A2J and the LSMP / LSMP Goal: To develop a coherent, credible and predictable legal framework established in a transparent and participatory manner, while at the same time building efficient, effective, equitable and accessible justice and law enforcement institutions and systems. / Links to LSMP: = I, A2J Rights Framework = Pillar I, Legislative Development = IV, Knowledge/Awareness = Pillar IV, Dissemination = II, Access/Interaction = Pillar II, Institutions = III, II)
  • Additional Strategies, Entry Points, and Recommendations Setting up of public information centres in the courts, to make them more approachable and user-friendly; particularly to the poor and vulnerable. Investigation of possible establishment of mobile or circuit courts at the district level. Improvement of physical access to the courts, especially for the disabled. A clarified and more balanced relationship between the prosecution and judges, as well as with lawyers. A more regularised and transparent relationship between informal, semi-formal, and formal justice systems. Training of paralegals at the village or, at least, district levels. Harmonisation/integration of the system of petitions with administrative and judicial