Kick-Off Meeting Presentation<br />Retaining wall ordinance<br />Summer 2011<br />
Today’s Presentation<br />What are we trying to accomplish?<br /><ul><li> Gather public input.
 Create objectives for draft ordinance.</li></ul>Discussion topics<br /><ul><li>Current code regulations and associated is...
Regulations in other jurisdictions.
Preliminary ideas to address issues.</li></li></ul><li>Current Code Regulations and Associated Issues<br />
Background<br />Current Retaining Wall Ordinance<br />Effective: March 9, 2005<br />Follow-up to Baseline Hillside Ordinan...
Relation to Baseline Hillside Ordinance (BHO)<br /><ul><li>New Retaining Wall Ordinance needs to be consistent with BHO
Before BHO became effective, grading was not limited
BHO grading regulations will act as an indirect limit on the size (e.g., length) of new retaining walls
Thus, if the quantity of grading is now limited do you want to use your allotment on retaining walls?</li></li></ul><li>Cu...
Current Zoning Code (cont’d)<br />3 ft. <br />10 ft.<br />Min.<br />Max.<br />Wall 2<br />10 ft.<br />Max.<br />Wall 1<br ...
3 ft. <br />10 ft.<br />Min.<br />Max.<br />Wall 2<br />10 ft.<br />Max.<br />Wall 1<br />Current Issues<br /><ul><li>Defi...
Number of retaining walls allowed (2) is too restrictive and encourages excessive grading
Maximum length is not defined
Horizontal distance between retaining walls does not allow for appropriate landscaping
Maximum wall height</li></li></ul><li>Other Jurisdictions<br />
Definition<br />Denver<br /><ul><li>A wall which is designed to, and in fact does, retain the earth on one side at a highe...
Number and Height<br />Anaheim<br /><ul><li>If visible to public right of way 6 ft. max. additional 6 ft. allowed if broke...
Number and Height<br />Santa Barbara<br /><ul><li>8 ft. wall acceptable if aesthetically pleasing;
6 ft. max. for stucco;
Fill slope: 6 ft. max. individual;12 ft. max. combined;
Cut slope: 8 ft. max. individual; 16 ft .max. combined;
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Retaining Wall Ordinance Kick-Off Meeting Presentation - September 2011

1,389 views
1,245 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,389
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Retaining Wall Ordinance Kick-Off Meeting Presentation - September 2011

  1. 1. Kick-Off Meeting Presentation<br />Retaining wall ordinance<br />Summer 2011<br />
  2. 2. Today’s Presentation<br />What are we trying to accomplish?<br /><ul><li> Gather public input.
  3. 3. Create objectives for draft ordinance.</li></ul>Discussion topics<br /><ul><li>Current code regulations and associated issues.
  4. 4. Regulations in other jurisdictions.
  5. 5. Preliminary ideas to address issues.</li></li></ul><li>Current Code Regulations and Associated Issues<br />
  6. 6. Background<br />Current Retaining Wall Ordinance<br />Effective: March 9, 2005<br />Follow-up to Baseline Hillside Ordinance<br />Effective: May 9, 2011<br />
  7. 7. Relation to Baseline Hillside Ordinance (BHO)<br /><ul><li>New Retaining Wall Ordinance needs to be consistent with BHO
  8. 8. Before BHO became effective, grading was not limited
  9. 9. BHO grading regulations will act as an indirect limit on the size (e.g., length) of new retaining walls
  10. 10. Thus, if the quantity of grading is now limited do you want to use your allotment on retaining walls?</li></li></ul><li>Current Zoning Code <br />“Retaining wall” defined as freestanding continuous structure, as viewed from the top, intended to support earth, which is not attached to a building<br />“Garden walls” not defined (but considered less than 4 ft. in height)<br />
  11. 11. Current Zoning Code (cont’d)<br />3 ft. <br />10 ft.<br />Min.<br />Max.<br />Wall 2<br />10 ft.<br />Max.<br />Wall 1<br />Maximum of one 12 ft. wall or two-10 ft. walls with a minimum distance of 3 ft. between them<br />
  12. 12. 3 ft. <br />10 ft.<br />Min.<br />Max.<br />Wall 2<br />10 ft.<br />Max.<br />Wall 1<br />Current Issues<br /><ul><li>Definitionis unclear and open for interpretation
  13. 13. Number of retaining walls allowed (2) is too restrictive and encourages excessive grading
  14. 14. Maximum length is not defined
  15. 15. Horizontal distance between retaining walls does not allow for appropriate landscaping
  16. 16. Maximum wall height</li></li></ul><li>Other Jurisdictions<br />
  17. 17. Definition<br />Denver<br /><ul><li>A wall which is designed to, and in fact does, retain the earth on one side at a higher elevation than the earth on the other side.</li></ul>Murrieta<br /><ul><li>A wall designed to resist the lateral displacement of soil or other materials.</li></li></ul><li>Definition<br />Beverly Hills<br /><ul><li>A wall or terraced combination of walls used to retain more than 18 inches of material and not used to support, provide a foundation for, or provide a wall for a building or structure.</li></ul>Oakland<br />"Enclosed retaining wall” means a retaining wall located on a lot such that it is visually shielded by other permanent structures and cannot be seen from public streets and adjacent lots.<br />
  18. 18. Number and Height<br />Anaheim<br /><ul><li>If visible to public right of way 6 ft. max. additional 6 ft. allowed if broken into 2- 3 ft. steps; if not visible then 14 ft. max. </li></ul>Brea<br /><ul><li>Cumulative height other than a Loffelstein wall or similar living wall, max. 6 ft. Cumulative height will equal the combined height of any wall or series of walls required to retain a single slope.</li></ul>Loffelstein (crib) wall<br />Brea<br />
  19. 19. Number and Height<br />Santa Barbara<br /><ul><li>8 ft. wall acceptable if aesthetically pleasing;
  20. 20. 6 ft. max. for stucco;
  21. 21. Fill slope: 6 ft. max. individual;12 ft. max. combined;
  22. 22. Cut slope: 8 ft. max. individual; 16 ft .max. combined;
  23. 23. Alternative to tall walls is stepped or terraced.</li></ul>Cut slope<br />Fill slope<br />Natural grade<br />fill<br /> 8’ max.<br /> 6’ max.<br />cut<br />12’ max.<br />fill<br />16’ max.<br />Natural grade<br />Finish <br />grade<br />cut<br />6’ max.<br />8’ max.<br />
  24. 24. Length<br />Santa Barbara<br />Max. 50 ft.; continuous walls acceptable if undulated, broken up by buttresses or pilasters, and made of natural materials.<br />Undulated wall<br />Buttress wall<br />Pilaster wall<br />
  25. 25. Length<br />Santa Clarita<br />Maximum 100 ft.<br />La Verne<br /><ul><li>In excess of 100 ft. shall employ architectural treatments such as pilasters, wall caps, or similar treatments in addition to landscaping to provide visual relief.</li></li></ul><li>Horizontal Distance Between Walls<br />Oakland<br />Minimum 4 ft. between the exposed faces of each wall.<br />Murrieta<br />Terraced walls require 6 ft. minimum; walls in required front yard setback requires 3 ft. minimum.<br />
  26. 26. Horizontal Distance Between Walls<br />La Verne<br />5 ft.<br />Santa Barbara<br />Minimum distance between 2 terraced walls will equal the min. average height of two walls.<br />Santa Barbara<br />
  27. 27. Preliminary Ideas<br />Clarify <br />If a single wall has a return or makes an angle as it traverses the site, is it considered one wall? <br />No more than one elevation per wall.<br />What if wall is attached to a building or structure?<br />Should “garden walls” be defined? What height?<br />
  28. 28. Preliminary Ideas<br />Not limiting number of walls but limiting combined maximum height (cumulative height).<br />Regulate length and/or surface area of wall.<br />If so, what variables should be considered?<br />
  29. 29. Preliminary Ideas<br />3 ft. <br />Min.<br />Wall 2<br />Wall 1<br />Increase minimum horizontal distance between walls.<br />What should the distance be for proper landscaping/irrigation?<br />Should minimum horizontal distance be related to the height of walls to be separated ? <br />
  30. 30. Next Steps<br />Compose draft ordinance<br />Workshop for draft ordinance<br />Public Hearing<br />City Planning Commission<br />
  31. 31. Thank You<br />For further information or<br />comments/questions please contact:<br />David Olivo at<br />david.olivo@lacity.org<br />(213) 473-9769<br />For updates on this project and other Code Studies projects, please visit us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/LACityCodeStudies<br />

×