• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Cliff Year
 

Cliff Year

on

  • 418 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
418
Views on SlideShare
418
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Cliff Year Cliff Year Presentation Transcript

    • FISCAL YEAR
      2011-2012
      THE
      “CLIFF YEAR”
    • Fiscal Year 2011-2012 is referred to as the “Cliff Year” because there will be a $1.6 billion mismatch in revenue and continuing expenditure costs that can only be eliminated by budget cuts or the infusion of money that is not contemplated in the Official Revenue Forecast for FY 12
    • Louisiana’s budget in the current year is $25.5 billion and some wonder why cutting $1.6 billion from that budget is such a big deal since an across-the-board cut of 6% would take care of the shortfall
    • The math is simple, right?
      $1.6 billion ÷
      = 6%
      $25.5 billion
    • So, why do budgeteers use such graphic terms like “cliff year” and why is everyone so concerned about a $1.6 billion shortfall in a $25.5 billion budget?
    • The upcoming slides provide a perspective on Louisiana’s budget that helps answer that question
    • Think of the FY 11 budget as a big pie with slices that represent the various categories of funding used to support expenditures. Federal Funds cannot be cut to deal with the shortfall
      FEDERAL
      FUNDS
      45%
      $11.5 B
    • For various reasons, the legislature and in some cases the citizens, have chosen to dedicate certain revenues for specific services. Dedicated funds are not generally considered to be available to offset a shortfall
      FEDERAL
      FUNDS
      45%
      $11.5 B
      DEDICATIONS
      18%
      $4.6 B
    • The legislature allows some agencies to charge a fee to offset some or all of the cost of their operations. These fees are not generally considered to be available to cover a budget shortfall in the General Fund
      FEDERAL
      FUNDS
      45%
      $11.5 B
      AGENCY FEES
      7% 1.7 B
      DEDICATIONS
      18%
      $4.6 B
    • The most versatile funding in the budget is the General Fund which can be used to pay for any expense of government
      GENERAL
      FUND
      30%
      $7.7 B
      FEDERAL
      FUNDS
      45%
      $11.5 B
      AGENCY FEES
      7% $1.7 B
      DEDICATIONS
      18%
      $4.6 B
    • Because there are restrictions on the use of the other sources of funding in the budget, the General Fund is where most of the cuts will have to be made to deal with the $1.6 billion shortfall
      GENERAL
      FUND
      30%
      $7.7 Billion
      Cutting $1.6 Billion out of this area of state funding would amount to a 20% across-the-board cut
    • However, there are even restrictions on the General Fund and those restrictions protect $5.1 billion of the total $7.7 billion from cuts. This uncuttable part of the budget is referred to as “non-discretionary” spending
      $2.6 Billion
      $5.1Billion
    • This leaves 10% of the total state budget or about $2.6 billion to absorb the $1.6 billion in cuts needed to eliminate the projected FY 12 shortfall
      $2.6 Billion
      NON-
      DISCRETIONARY
      FEDERAL
      AGENCY
      FEES
      DEDICATIONS
    • Breakdown of Discretionary
      General Fund Budget
    • If the budget shortfall of $1.6 Billion could be cut from the total budget, the percentage cut to each department would be relatively small
      $1.6 billion ÷ $25.5 billion = 6%
      Percent cut to total FY 11 budget to eliminate a $1.6 billion shortfall
      Projected FY 12 Shortfall
      Total FY 11 Budget
      Most Depts.
      Could Live
      With This
    • Unfortunately, 90% of the state’s budget is protected from cuts, so the shortfall must be absorbed by those departments that receive discretionary appropriations and the percentage cut is very high
      Most departments
      could NOT manage
      this level of a cut
      without a significant
      reduction in
      services
      $1.7 billion ÷ $25.5 billion = 6%
      $2.6 billion = 62%
      $1.6 billion
      ÷
      Percent cut to FY 11 discretionary budget required to eliminate
      the $1.6 billion shortfall
      FY 11 Discretionary
      Budget
      Projected FY 12 Shortfall
    • This is a tough problem and we’re almost ready to begin exploring the implications of dealing with it, but there’s a little more background that still needs to be covered. First, there is the issue of how the FY 11 budget was balanced
    • The General Fund revenue forecast for FY 11 was insufficient to support the continuation of programs supported by the General Fund in FY 10
      All Other Programs
      Gen.
      Fund
      Econ.
      Dev.
      State
      Parks
      K-12
      Corrections
      Health
      Care
      Higher
      Ed.
    • So, federal stimulus funding (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) was added to the budget. This brought the budget closer to balance but there was still a funding gap
      All Other Programs
      Econ.
      Dev.
      Gen.
      Fund
      State
      Parks
      K-12
      ARRA
      Corrections
      Health
      Care
      Higher
      Ed.
    • In order to achieve the mandated balance required by the Constitution, it was necessary to also use “non-recurring” (a.k.a. one-time) funding from a variety of sources
      All Other Programs
      K-12
      Econ.
      Dev.
      State
      Parks
      $1.1 Billion
      Gen.
      Fund
      $458 million
      Corrections
      ARRA
      Health
      Care
      Higher
      Ed.
      One
      Time
    • But, those ARRA and one-time monies will not be available in FY 12, and even though there is a substantial increase in recurring revenue, there is a funding gap of $1.6 billion in that Fiscal Year
      All Other Programs
      Econ.
      Dev.
      K-12
      State
      Parks
      Gen.
      Fund
      Corrections
      Health
      Care
      Higher
      Ed.
      $ 1.6 B Shortfall
    • The Final Bit Of Background Deals With The Projected Shortfall For FY 12
      And What It Portends For Future Fiscal Years
      $ 1.6 B Shortfall
    • On January 21st, the Division of Administration presented its revised 5-Year Budget Projection to the Joint Budget Committee. The numbers are very instructive about the challenge facing the governor and the legislature
      (in million $)
      4.79%
      4.34%
      6.18%
      Rev. Growth Rate
      7.47%
      Notice that very large shortfalls occur in all four years despite strong revenue growth in an economy that’s still recovering from the recession
    • To emphasize just how deep the budget hole is, the revenue growth rates for FY 12, 13, and 14 were changed in the table below to match the growth rates Louisiana experienced in the three years following Katrina to see how a return to the heydays of revenue growth would impact the shortfall
      (in million $)
      16.6%
      4.34%
      6.18%
      Rev. Growth Rate
      At these growth rates, the dedication of the sales tax on motor vehicles to the Transportation Trust Fund would kick in beginning in FY 14
      8.8%
    • The preceding couple of slides show that the shortfall that will occur in FY 12 is likely to continue at approximately the same level through FY 15 even with post-Katrina revenue growth rates unless permanent cuts are made to expenditures and/or revenues are increased above the projected growth levels
    • Options for dealing with the FY 12 shortfall
      Yes
      No

      ▪ New revenue – taxes
      Governor says No!

      ▪ New revenue – user fees
      High Ed. $130 M
      ▪ Federal bailout -

      Has own problems
      ▪ Cut constitutional dedications

      Trigger not met
      ▪ Cut statutory dedications

      Can do - but political
      ▪ Become more efficient

      Can do – not much $
      ▪ Cut non-discretionary exp.

      Can do – but political

      ▪ Sell Assets
      Can do – one time $
      26
    • Let’s look at the “yes” checks and see how those options might impact
      the FY 12 shortfall if utilized
      ▪ New revenue – user fees
      Yes
      No

      High Ed. $130 M
      ▪ Cut statutory dedications

      Can do - political
      ▪ Become more efficient

      Can do – not much $
      ▪ Cut non-discretionary exp.

      Can do - political

      ▪ Sell Assets
      27
      Can do – one time $
    • Option 1: New Revenue – User fees
      In 1995, the Constitution was changed to require a two-thirds majority of the legislature for the enactment of a fee or the increase of an existing fee. Higher education has developed a proposal that would raise approximately $130 million in FY 12. Other departments of government collect user fees that could be priced to help offset part of the shortfall. Some of the other departments that could benefit by increasing fees would be:
      Agriculture
      Recreation and Tourism
      Corrections
      Public Safety
      Health and Hospitals
    • Option 2: Cut Statutory Dedications
      The FY 11 budget includes $4.6 billion worth of programs funded with statutory dedications. Most of the dedications are made by the Constitution and cannot be cut in FY 12 without a change to the Constitution. However, approximately $860 million of those dedications are made by statute and can be changed during any regular session of the legislature. Adding those dedications to the cuttable expenditure base would reduce the cut from 62% to 46%
      Across-the Board
      Cuts Required
      Budget Shortfall FY 12 $ 1,600,000,000
      Disc. Gen. Fund Budget $ 2,600,000,000 62%
      Add: Statutory Dedications* $ 866,000,000 46%
      29
    • Option 3: Cut Non-Discretionary Expenditures That Are Not Constitutionally Mandated
      The non-discretionary budget for FY 11 is $5.1 billion and all but about $1 billion is constitutionally mandated. There are good reasons (legally and politically) why these funds aren’t normally on the chopping block but tough times call for tough measures so let’s add them to the list.
      Across-the Board
      Cuts Required
      Budget Shortfall FY 12 $ 1,600,000,000
      Disc. Gen. Fund Budget $ 2,600,000,000 62%
      Add: Statutory Dedications $ 866,000,000 46%
      Add: Non-discretionary $ 1,055,000,000 35%
      30
    • The items below are non-constitutionally mandated expenditures in the non-discretionary budget. Many of these expenditures could be cut to help reduce the shortfall but most have a very high political profile and a few are closely monitored by
      the U.S. Justice Department
      ▪ Minimum level custody and & care state inmates $343 M
      ▪ Legislative and Judicial Branch expenditures $201 M
      ▪ Housing of state prisoners in local jails $179 M
      ▪ Aid/assistance for the developmentally disabled $169 M
      ▪ Health insurance premiums for retired employees $110 M
      ▪ Rent and maintenance in state-owned buildings $ 28 M
      ▪ Supplemental pay for Assistant District Attorneys $ 25 M
      ▪ Total $1,055 M
    • Option 4: Become More Efficient
      State agencies have been under budget pressure for three years running and have picked most of the low hanging “efficiency” fruit. Since there’s always room for improvement, let’s suppose that there is still $100 million in General Fund savings that can be achieved through efficiencies in FY 12.
      Across-the Board
      Cuts Required
      Budget Shortfall FY 12 $ 1,600,000,000
      Less: Efficiencies $ (100,000,000)
      Disc. Gen. Fund Budget $ 2,600,000,000 57%
      Add: Statutory Dedications $ 866,000,000 43%
      Add: Non-discretionary $ 1,055,000,000
      33%
    • Option 5: Sell State Assets
      Ideally, funds generated from the sale of assets should be put into non-recurring expenditures or be used to pay down debt that would reduce recurring expenses in future years. However, cuts of at least 32% across the board for agencies funded with discretionary funds, statutorily dedicated funds, and non-discretionary funds not constitutionally mandated would devastate many programs vital to the state’s economic security and the quality of life of its citizens. Using the proceeds from the sale of assets might get the state past an election year and buy some time for a more rational budget plan to be developed.
    • Remember this slide that was covered earlier. It is the most important one of the whole briefing. It says that the $1.6 billion shortfall will continue through at least FY 15 unless there is a PERMANENT INCREASE IN REVENUE above what’s already in the forecast or a PREMANENT REDUCTION IN EXPENDITURES
      4.79%
      4.34%
      6.18%
      Rev. Growth Rate
      7.47%
    • SOME FINAL THOUGHTS
    • The state has faced large budget shortfalls in the past and was able to avoid significant curtailment of services. Why might it be different this time?
    • The state is in its third year of
      budget cuts and downsizing. Budgets are lean with little slack left to absorb additional cuts without significant reductions in services
      2. As cuts shrink the size of the “discretionary” budget, the non-discretionary budget becomes a greater percentage of the General Fund budget. This change exposes departments in the “discretionary budget” to larger cuts
    • 3. The budget shortfall is not the result of a revenue forecast that is declining which would “trigger” access to constitutionally dedicated funds that could help mitigate the shortfall and legislation that would have increased the legislature’s access to those funds did not pass
      4. There are fewer options to infuse non-recurring funding into the revenue stream to stave off cuts because many of those options have already been used
    • 5. The 2011 Regular Session precedes a state-wide election year and this makes all decisions more difficult
    • There is no question that tax cuts and dedications enacted over the past four years have contributed to the shortfall. However, the legislature has enacted fewer tax cuts and dedications in each of the recent years leading up to the FY 12 cliff year
    • When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging!
      41
    • FY 12 Loss to the General Fund as a result of tax cuts and dedication legislation enacted since 2007*
      The General
      Fund loss is at least this much annually going forward
      2007 Regular Session -$508.8 Million
      2008 Extra. Session -$283.0 Million
      2008 Regular Session -$101.5 Million**
      2009 Regular Session -$ 88.5 Million
      2010 Regular Session -$ .1 Million
      TOTAL FY 12Impact -$981 .9 Million
      * *Additional dedication of $166.3 million was delayed and not included in the revenue loss for this FY
      * Source: Fiscal Notes Legislative Fiscal Office
    • UNMET NEEDS/DEFERRED DEDICATIONS
      In addition to the projected shortfall, there are unmet needs and deferred dedications that must eventually be addressed
      • Highways ($14 Billion approx.) - gasoline tax revenue grows at about 2% annually and highway construction and maintenance costs grow at about 6%
      • UAL on Retiree Group Benefits ($11 Billion approx.) – this liability continues to grow because there are no active plans to deal with it
      • Deferred maintenance on state buildings and college campuses ($4.3 Billion approx.)
      • State self-insurance program - R.S. 42:851 ($1.2 Billion approx.)
    • end of presentation
    • $ 1.6 B Shortfall