• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire- a way to measure “culture of safety”
 

Safety Attitudes Questionnaire- a way to measure “culture of safety”

on

  • 2,655 views

Measuring “Culture of Safety” Tawam’s Experience ...

Measuring “Culture of Safety” Tawam’s Experience

Discovery:
Tawam Hospital’s Executive leadership realized the need to establish a “Culture of Safety” within the organization and implemented the Johns Hopkins Medicine “Comprehensive Unit based Safety Program” (CUSP). CUSP was introduced as a pilot project in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NNU) and Paediatric Oncology Unit (Peds Onc).
Prior to implementation the leadership decided to measure staff perception of safety using evidence based tool.

Solution:
Tawam partnered with Pascal Metrics to implement the Safety Attitude Questionnaire survey. The SAQ was administered to all Tawam Hospital staff in three phases (2008, 2010 and 2011). In 2010 the pilot CUSP units were also resurveyed to determine the status of safety culture since its introduction in 2008.
 An email from the CEO was sent to the participants encouraging them to participate in the SAQ survey.
 Physicians, nurses, ward-clerks; respiratory therapist, physiotherapist, dieticians etc were included in the survey.
 Those who spent at least 50% of their time in the identified units were only included to participate in the survey.
 Survey was administered during departmental meetings to increase response rate.
 Conducted separate sessions of physicians.
 Staff dropped the completed surveys in an envelope.
 82% of staff in the patient care areas of the whole hospital participated in the overall 3 phases of SAQ Survey.
 The three CUSP pilot units were re-surveyed in 2010.
 Anonymity, privacy and confidentiality were maintained from the beginning till the end.

Outcome:
The survey results were graded against percentage positive responses. Responses that were less than 60% mark were graded in the danger zone and anything above the 80% mark were graded in the goal zone. Teamwork climate and Safety climate scale scores are considered to be primary dependent variables, because they are important in preventing patient harm.

The overall hospital score on all the domain scores were in the danger zone, less than 60%. 20 clinical locations in 2010 and 7 clinical locations in 2011 had less than 60% scores in the primary dependent variables.
The SAQ results were disseminated department wise in the presence of a hospital Senior Executive. Every department did an action plan using the SAQ de-briefer tool. The hospital administrators to bring about the change played a facilitators role and helped the departments to come up with their actionable plans.
The hospital leadership in their pursuit to continuing the culture of safety journey, identified six more units for CUSP implementation based on the Phase 2 SAQ scores of 2010. Accordingly the Medical 1, Medical 2, Surgical 1, Surgical 2, Day Case and OBGYN Units were identified for the CUSP roll out. Senior Executive leaders were assigned to each of these new CUSP units to ensure leadership commi

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,655
Views on SlideShare
2,655
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
55
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Safety Attitudes Questionnaire- a way to measure “culture of safety” Safety Attitudes Questionnaire- a way to measure “culture of safety” Presentation Transcript

    • Safety Attitudes QuestionnaireA way to measure “Culture of Safety”Presented via Skype (2:00pm-2:15pm)URMPM World Congress 9th September 2012 –London Krish Sankaranarayanan MS, MBA, CPHQ Senior Safety Officer Tawam Hospital Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
    • “Culture is local” and “so is change.”
    • Safety Attitudes Questionnaireprovides a baseline to understand staff perception of safety
    • Early adopters- Aviation 6 main components (called characteristics) of safety culture are described: • Commitment • Justness • Information • Awareness • Adaptability • Behavior
    • Most rigorously tested and well knowntools• Safety Attitudes Questionnaire• Patient Safety Culture in Healthcare Organizations• Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture• Safety Climate Survey• Manchester Patient Safety Assessment Framework
    • Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-Adopted in HealthcareJ. Bryan Sexton, Ph.D.,• Was the Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.• Currently Director of Patient Safety Operations at Duke University Hospital.
    • Culture of Safety Survey- Domains1.Teamwork Climate: The perceived quality of teamwork and collaboration within a given unit.2.Safety Climate: The perceived level of commitment to and focus on patient safety within a given unit.3.Job Satisfaction: Employees general feelings of positivity regarding their work experience.4.Stress Recognition: Employees recognition of how stressors impact their performance.5.Working Conditions: Employees perceptions of the quality of their work environment.6.Perceptions of Hospital Management: Employees perceptions of the support and competence of hospital-level management.7.Perceptions of Unit Management: Employees perceptions of the support and competence of unit-level management
    • Culture linkages to Clinical,Operational & other Outcomes •Wrong Site •Burnout Surgeries •Unit size •Decubitus Ulcers •Communication •Delays breakdowns •Bloodstream •Familiarity Infections •Spirituality •Post-Op Sepsis •Most validated: •Post-Op Infections Qual. Saf. Health •Post-Op Bleeding Care •PE/DVT 2005;14;364-366 •RN Turnover •Absenteeism •VAP
    • SAQ- Administration methodology• The hospital partnered with Pascal Metrics.• Identified the units and collected the list of staff.• Staff that spent 50% of their time in the identified units were only included in the survey.• All disciplines were included in the survey.• Given a brief introduction of the purpose of the survey• Was anonymous and a voluntary exercise.• Hand delivered survey• Done during a staff/department meeting.
    • SAQ- Administration methodology.Contd…• Distributed sharpened pencil with eraser.• Didn’t leave the surveys in pigeon holes for staff to complete.• Didn’t leave the surveys with departments heads.• Conducted separate sessions of physicians.• Staff dropped the completed surveys in an envelope.
    • Survey participation and response rate • 82% of staff in patient care areas of the whole hospital participated in the overall 3 phases of SAQ Survey. Targeted Surveys Survey Survey Location Year staff Administered Returned response ratePhase 1 CUSP Pilot Units 2008 199 199 199 100%Phase 2 In-patient areas 2010 1600 1476 1450 98% Out-Patient & satellite Qtr 4Phase 3 locations 2011 805 497 483 60% Total 2604 2172 2132
    • Dissemination of the SAQ ?Challenges we faced• The questions in the SAQ did not translate well.• Staff took the results personally if low scores.• Dept managers defended low scores. ▫ Especially on perception of unit management.• Staff expected positive actions from management based on SAQ results.
    • Dissemination of the SAQ ? • Results were sensitive, so did it with individual departments. • Did not share results of one dept with the other. • Had a senior executive leader (C-Suites)while disseminating. • Emphasized that the SAQ was a survey on perception and NOT AN EXAM RESULT. • Emphasized that “Culture is local” and “so is change.” (Micro System)
    • Perceptions of Hospital ManagementIs always low• Staff may not see the C-suites frequently.• Staff relate themselves more with the unit mangers than executive leaders.
    • 2008 SAQ Phase-1 (CUSP Pilot Units) SAQ Results 2008 100% 80%Average % Positive 60% ICU 40% Pediatric Oncology NNU 20% 0% Teamwork Safety Job Stress Perceptions Perceptions Working Satisfaction Recognition of Hospital of Unit Conditions Management Management Domain
    • 2010 SAQ Phase-2 (All In-patient Units-& CUSP Pilot Units Re-survey)
    • 2011 SAQ Phase-3 (Out-patient Units)
    • Team Work Climate
    • ICU Physicians and ICU RN 100 Collaboration 90 80 70 88% 60 50 40 30 51% 20 10 0 KP L &DRN rates ICU Physician ICU Physician rates RN
    • Teamwork Disconnect • RN: Good teamwork means I am asked for my input • MD: Good teamwork means the nurse does what I say
    • Safety Climate
    • Job Satisfaction
    • Stress Recognition
    • Perceptions Of Hospital Management
    • Perceptions Of Unit Management
    • Working Conditions
    • Dependent Variables of SAQ • The primary dependent variables -teamwork climate and safety climate scale scores. • These primary dependent variables were chosen because they are important in preventing patient harm. • The rest of them are secondary dependent variables.Sexton J.B., et al.: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: Psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMCHealth Serv Res 6(44):Apr. 3, 2006.Timmel J, Kent PS, Holzmueller CG, Paine L, Schulick RD, Pronovost PJ. Impact of the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program(CUSP) on safety culture in a surgical inpatient unit. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36(6):252-260.
    • Safety ClimatePerception of Unit Management Safety Climate Stress RecognitionPerception of Unit Management Safety Climate Working Conditions Job Satisfaction Team Work Climate Job Satisfaction Safety Climate Stress Recognition
    • Home workDe-briefer (Group activity without dept managers)• Identify a specific area of concern.• Select one or two items.• Provide insights and recommendations.• Foster actionable ideas for improvement.
    • Culture of Safety is a journey • Takes as long as 5 years to develop a culture of safety that is felt throughout an organization. (Ginsburg et.al 2005) • Need Patience, Perseverance, Commitment & Engagement.Ginsburg, L., P. G. Norton, A. Casebeer, and S. Lewis. 2005. ‘‘An Educational Intervention to Enhance Nurse Leaders’ Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture.’’Health Services Research 40 (4): 997–1020.
    • Thank You Contacts:ksankara@tawamhospital.ae 050-9211649