2008-2014 Math
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

2008-2014 Math

on

  • 364 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
364
Views on SlideShare
364
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

2008-2014 Math Presentation Transcript

  • 1. K.
Beane
11/2010
 K­5
Math
Program
Development
 2008­2014
 
 
 Internal

Review
 Audit
 Professional
 Program
 Implementation
 Implementation
 Learning
 Development
 
 
 2008­2009
 2009­2010
 2010­2011
 2011­2012
 2012­2013
 2013­2014
 Consistent
  Parent
Conf.
Assessments
 Align
Progress
Report
to
 Implement
aligned
 K‐2
  Prog
Rpt
Assessments
 
 
Assessment
 New
Program
 assessments
 National
Assessments
  Scoring/Expectations
 based
on
Common
Core
  Timing/Sequence
 slated
2014­2015.
 Consistent
 Consistent
 No
major
changes
prior.
  Parent
Conf.
Assessments
  Prog
Rpt
Assessments
 Align
Progress
Report
to
 3‐5
 
 
  Scoring/Expectations
  Scoring/Expectations
 New
Program
 
  Timing/Sequence
 
 
 Current
Math
Research
*
 Assessment
Admin.
Professional
Development
 K‐2
 Current
Math
Programs
 New
Program
Training
 Implementation
Training
 Refinement
Training
 Consistent
Scoring
 Using
Prog
Report
Data
 
 Assessment

&
Data
Use
 Prerequisite
Skills
 Prog
Rpts
As
Formative
 
 Prog
Rpt
Indicators
 Foundational
Skills
 Diff
&
Individualization
 “Change
Over”
Training
 3‐5
 Instruction
w/a
Rubric
 Skill
Deficits
 New
Program
Training
 Implementation
Training
 Math
Knowledge
 Tech
IMI

 
 Scoring
w/a
Rubric
 IMI
Tools
and
Resources
 Mathletes
 Monitor
Student
Progress
 Model
Data
Usage
 Interventions
for
Math
 
 Charting
Student
Progress
 Model
Classroom
IMI
 
 
 Lead
Data
Conversations
 Tech‐iPod
Touch
Indiv.
 Model
Tech
IMI
 
 Intro
Individualized
Math
 
 K‐2
 
 
 Implement
Curric
K,
1,
2
 
Curriculum
&
Instruction
 Compare
Current
Texts
 Solidify
Instruct.
Time
 •Traditional

(Foresman)
 Full
IMI
Implementation

 •Constructivist

(Everyday)
 STEM
Teachers
 3‐5
 
 
 
 Implement
Curric
3,4,5
 •Common
Core
(Singapore)
 
 Comparative
Txt
Analysis
 
 Cmtes
 
 
 













5+programs
 Write
Curric
K,
1,
2
 Write
Curric
3,
4,
5
 Feedback
&
Revisions
 Text
Selection
 
 Audit

 Principal
Training
 Admin
 
 
 Establish
Program
Goals
 Monitor
Implementation
 Monitor
Implementation
 Parent
Introduction
 
 
 
 2008­2009
 2009­2010
 2010­2011
 2011­2012
 2012­2013
 2013­2014
 
*Our
look
at
research
focuses
on
the
National
Math
Advisory
Panel
Report
(2008),
Assisting
Students
Who
Struggle
With
Mathematics:
Response
to
Intervention
for
Elementary
and
Middle
School
(2009),
and
the
new
Common
Core
State
Standards
for
Mathematics
(2010).

We
also
reference
Marzano’s
research
on
improving
student
performance
by
charting
progress,
Deborah
Loewenberg‐Ball’s
research
on
Mathematics
Knolwedge
for
Teaching,
The
2010
McKinsey
Report
and
Bill
Schmidt’s
TIMSS
analysis,
which
both
look
at
math
education
in
high
performing
countries,
and
the
joint
report
(National
Staff
Development
Council
and

Stanford
Center
on
Opportunity
Policy
in
Education)
on
professional
development
practices
in
the
United
States.
(2010).