• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
The Law of Print Media
 

The Law of Print Media

on

  • 1,020 views

The Law of Print Media

The Law of Print Media

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,020
Views on SlideShare
1,020
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
22
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The Law of Print Media The Law of Print Media Presentation Transcript

    • The Law of Print Media
    • Constitutional Provisions THE RIGHT TO PUBLISH NEWS is not expressly granted by law, but is founded on the general liberty of the people.
    • “No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” Sub section of Sec. 1, Art. III of the 1935 Constitution states:
    • The reporter or publisher may be held LIABLE for printing or publishing any of the following:  those injurious - to the reputation or privacy of persons - to the public order and national security - to the public morals - to the integrity and efficiency of public bodies
    • Branch of Law affected: CRIMINAL LAW - libel, obscenity, inciting to sedition, contempt, unlawful publication of official papers, & others CIVIL LAW - libel, breach of privacy, violation of copyright, unfair competition ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - concerning postal law, mailing privileges, customs regulations - it is the libel law which campus editors may most likely violate
    • “A public and malicious imputation of a crime, or a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstances tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or judicial person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead.” Art. 353 of the revised Penal Code (Act. Bo. 3815, as amended)
    • the type of defamation with a permanent record, like a newspaper, a letter, a website posting, an email, a picture, or a radio or TV broadcast the type of defamation with no permanent record—normally it's a spoken statement and it can also be a hand gesture or something similar
    • Four requisites to make a publication libelous: 1 • Defamatory imputation 2 • Malice (either in law or in fact) 3 • Publication of the imputation 4 • Identity and certainty of the person libeled
    • 1. Defamatory Statement  if it exposes a person to hatred, ridicule, or contempt, or it causes him to be avoided or shunned and has the tendency to injure him in his office, profession, or trade  if it tends to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him
    • The law doesn't protect you from a personal insult or a remark that injures only your pride; it protects reputation, not feelings. So if someone calls you a lazy slob, you might be hurt, but you probably don't have a good reason to sue. If he goes on to say you cheat in your business dealings, you probably do have a good reason to sue, as long as he says it to someone else, not just to you. If he says it only to you, you can't sue because he has not hurt your reputation.
    • 2. Malice, either in law or in fact  if it may denote unprivileged publication or defamatory matter without lawful excuse (malice in law) and if it may mean an evil motive or ill-will in making the publication (malice in fact)
    • A former employee of yours gave your name to an employer as a reference and that employer calls you for a reference. You say, "Well, frankly, I found that this employee caused morale problems." As long as you act in good faith and without malice, and your statement is not made to more people than necessary, then the defense of qualified privilege protects you if the former employee sues you for defamation. You gave your honest opinion and the caller had a legitimate interest in hearing it.
    • A newspaper columnist may write that a Member of Parliament (an MP) says he supports equality and equal rights, but he opposes same-sex marriages. The columnist writes that the MP is hypocritical. If the MP sues the columnist for defamation, the columnist has the defense of fair comment. Media articles that accurately report what was said at public meetings are also privileged, unless the meeting was not of public concern and the report was not for public benefit.
    • 3. Publication of the imputation  to be libelous, the defamatory statement should be published  the communication of the libelous matter must be known and understood by a third person, other than the plaintiff and the defendant
    • 4. Identity and certainty of the person libeled  the victim of the defamation must be clearly identified  identification need not be by name  a third person must identify him as the subject of defamatory matter
    •  Libel per se  Libel per qoud
    • Libel per se (libel in itself or by itself)  which means „on its face‟ in Latin  is a defamatory statement which speaks for itself and needs no further proof of its meaning or its intent  is a falsely written accusation Libel per quod  which means „under cover‟ in Latin  is written material that becomes libelous under certain circumstances  there is a necessity to look behind the face of the writing to determine whether the statement actually does harm
    • - if they are so obviously hurtful to the person aggrieved by them that they require no explanation and no proofs of their injurious character to make them actionable
    • “A stole 10,000 from B.” “A has leprosy.” “X plays tennis when he should be tending to the affairs of his bureau.” “X knows only how to collect fees but not how to win cases.” “X was born out of wedlock.” “X is willing to sleep with any man.”  The following are pertaining to libel per se:
    • - Did the alleged defamatory article really cause injury? This had to be proved.
    •  A newspaper publishes a birth announcement claiming that Sandra Williams on Main Street is the proud mother, but Sandra is a 16-year-old and a devout Christian, and the paper really meant to write about another Sandra who lives on Second Street.  The error is libel per quod because Sandra is a minor, and the announcement may suggest that she is promiscuous or immoral and not a devout Christian after all.
    • Defamation may also be committed in the headline and caption: HEADLINE- “Murderer arrested”  the plaintiff had been arrested but had not yet been charged by the court as guilty CAPTION- “(L-R) X X X have been arrested for smuggling…”  the people mentioned in the picture were balikbayan  there was an erroneous switching of captions (switcheroo) of two cuts on the same page
    • Cruz, Ceciliano-Jose. (2010). Campus Journalism and School Paper Advising. Quezon City: Rex Publishing Co., Inc. Retrieved January 28, 2013 at http://www.cba.org/bc/public media / rights/240.aspx.
    • BSE-ENG