Integrating Social Bookmarking into Library Content

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Integrating Social Bookmarking into Library Content - Presentation Transcript

    1. MTagger Integrating Social Bookmarking into Library Content Ken Varnum Web Systems Manager University of Michigan Library Michigan Library Association 2009
    2. Introduction
    3. A Brief History of Social Bookmarking
      • Late 1990s – lots of small networked bookmark services (links in the protocloud)
      • Early 2000s saw Del.icio.us come into being
        • Added tagging to online bookmarks
        • Coined term “Social Bookmarking ”
        • Gained millions of users, eventually sold to Yahoo!
    4. Tagging Moves Into Mainstream
      • Facebook
      • Technorati
      • Flickr
      • Amazon
      • Twitter (#mla2009)
      • Etc., etc., etc.
    5. Why?
      • Seems that everyone feels the need to categorize & organize (not just us librarians!)
      • Tool for us to share our knowledge, expertise, opinion
      • Leave tracks for the future – Kilroy Was Here
    6. Tagging at MLibrary
      • Enhance findability of objects
      • Enable future researchers to follow existing paths
      • Generate source of improved metadata
      • Let our patrons find things a second time
    7. Tagging Goodness is Baked Right In
      • Web site
      • Catalog
      • Digital images
      • Digital publications
      • Bookmarklet for everything else
    8.  
    9.  
    10.  
    11.  
    12. Usage vs. Expectations
      • Enhance findability of objects
      • Enable future researchers to follow existing paths
      • Generate source of improved metadata
      • Let our patrons find things a second time
    13. Usage
      • As of 11/04/09
      • 2395 total users (1015 active)
      • 5033 tags (4145 unique)
      • 11552 items tagged
    14. I Tried It, But I Didn’t Inhale
      • Majority of taggers tag one item. Once.
      • Faculty, staff, students
      • Not as broadly / deeply as we’d like
        • Most items tagged by one person
        • Most items tagged with a single tag
    15. A Note on Privacy
      • Tagging tied to U-M single sign-on (uniqname); guest accounts welcome
      • Accountability & public face
      • Balance of anonymity and sharing
      • Most feedback on this issue from a single source
    16. Usability Study
      • Conducted over four months in summer 2008
      • Two students at U-M School of Information
      • Librarians on steering committee
      • Heuristic evaluation
      • In-depth user interviews
    17. Usability: Interface Problems
    18. Usability: Interface Problems
    19. Usability: Purpose of Tagging
      • Unclear to users
      • Personal motivations are stronger than social motivations
      • “What’s in it for me” not apparent
      • Tagging is a "Librarian" thing
    20. Usability Recommendations
      • Tag cloud display on pages
      • Tag cloud display in MTagger
      • Preference for tag display alongside traditional search results
      • Handling of “collections”
      • Workflow
    21. Lessons Learned
      • Motivations
      • Outcomes
      • Enable personal reference library
      • Contextualize the material
    22. Motivations
      • To find things again
      • To pull together research
      • To share with others
    23. Outcomes
      • Easier sharing:
        • Tags
        • Tagged items
        • User lists
      • Publish to other social networking tools
    24. Personal Reference Library
      • Tagging is less a goal than a byproduct
      • Be more like Zotero, CiteULike,
      • Reinvention of ‘My Library’
    25. Context is King
      • A tagged item shouldn’t wander the wilderness
      • What’s related?
      • How can I use it?
    26. In a Broader Context
      • There’s an RLG group devoted to social media
      • A survey is underway at Survey Monkey: http://bit.ly/4xN52Z
      • A few findings from our analysis – courtesy of Karen Smith-Yoshimura at RLG
    27. Some Observations
      • Great variety of sites – many new
      • Success tied to objective and audience, not necessarily traffic
      • Value in leveraging “sense of community”
      • Some sites heavily moderated, others not at all
      • Strict credentialing limits effectiveness
      • Lots of features of little value if not used and require more documentation, overhead
      Courtesy Karen Smith-Yoshimura, RLG
    28. Some More Observations
      • Few sites use ranking, filtering mechanisms, use patterns to guide visitors
      • Institution-specific sites have fewer contributions than aggregate sites
      • Tags contributed on network-level of more value
      • Tagging is most useful when there is no existing metadata (e.g. photos, videos, audio)
      • Need “critical mass” and “sense of community” (existing or created)
      Courtesy Karen Smith-Yoshimura, RLG
    29. Why Contribute? (Prelim)
      • Tie-in to community of fellow enthusiasts
      • Ongoing conversation from own lives
      • Pragmatic
      • Feeling of contributing to the “brand” of the institution or community
      • Enhance own reputation
      Courtesy Karen Smith-Yoshimura, RLG
    30. MTagger’s Goals Today
      • Put tagging in the flow
      • Put emphasis on the patron
      • Tagging as background activity; saving as foreground
      • Improve the interface for secondary discovery
      • Mirlyn (catalog) is model
    31.  
    32. Bigger Picture
      • Benefit to scale (delicious, flickr)
      • Benefit to academic (“serious”) focus
      • Mechanism needed for sharing tags across libraries
    33. Open APIs
      • Programmatically query for an item/user/tag, find out what associated elements are
      • Uses include research guides, current awareness
      • Are we already pulling old Mirlyn items into Vufind Mirlyn via MTagger?
    34. Open Code
      • Current MTagger is Available
      • Contact me for link
      • Future code will also be available
    35. Open Tagging
      • We would be happy to explore building social bookmarking into other library sites using our code; code is available.
      • The more the merrier
      • Want to tag in our pool?
      • Contact me
    36. Concluding Thoughts
      • Social Bookmarking is a social phenomenon
      • Has a clear motivation for the tagger – find my stuff again
      • Connect that motivation to the library patron
      • Research trails will follow
    37. Thank You
      • Email: [email_address]
      • Twitter: @varnum
      • RSS4Lib (blog): http://www.rss4lib.com/
      • Slides: http://www.slideshare.net/KenVarnum
      • MTagger: http://www.lib.umich.edu/mtagger/

    + Ken VarnumKen Varnum, 3 weeks ago

    custom

    83 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The University of Michigan library launched MTagger more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 83
      • 83 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories