Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Diamond Mining Impacts on Breeding Damara Terns

on

  • 726 views

This presentation was given at the 8th Pan-African Ornitholigcal Congress in September 2008. The abstract reads as follows:...

This presentation was given at the 8th Pan-African Ornitholigcal Congress in September 2008. The abstract reads as follows:
The Damara Tern (Sterna balaenarum) is a near-endemic, near-threatened seabird that breeds along the Namibian coastline. Its breeding range extends into the Sperrgebiet, a diamond mining area along the southern coast of Namibia about to be proclaimed as a National Park. A study is being conducted to investigate the potential impact of diamond mining on the breeding productivity of the Damara Tern at one mined locality, Elizabeth Bay, and three other nesting sites along the southern Namibian coastline. Diamond mining may impact the breeding productivity in several ways: habitat destruction, disturbance, and foraging efficiency due to sediment discharge. Parameters monitored are colony size, breeding success, chick growth and condition, and adult foraging success. Out of the four breeding sites monitored, Elizabeth Bay has the smallest number of nests. The number of nests has also decreased from 30 in 1979 (before mining), to 13 (during mining) in 2008. Nests were previously found in areas which have since been mined and are now unsuitable nesting habitats. The other non-mined sites were Marmora Pan (55 nests), Grossebucht (21 nests) and Hottentot’s Bay (80 nests). Breeding success and chick predation rates differ between sites. So far no differences in chick growth rates and adult foraging success could be established between mined and non-mined sites. Chick growth and condition, however seem to be dependent on the distance between colony and feeding sites.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
726
Views on SlideShare
722
Embed Views
4

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

3 Embeds 4

https://www.facebook.com 2
http://www.facebook.com 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Diamond Mining Impacts on Breeding Damara Terns Diamond Mining Impacts on Breeding Damara Terns Presentation Transcript

  • The breeding success of the Damara Tern Sterna balaenarum in the restricted diamond mining area of southern Namibia Justine Braby, Les Underhill, Rob Simmons and Jean Paul Roux
  • Damara Tern Sterna balaenarum
    • Small seabird (52g) that breeds in small, isolated colonies (predominantly) along the desert coastlines of Namibia and South Africa
    • Classified as Near-threatened under the IUCN red-data list (world population - 13,500)
    • Migrates to West African countries like Gabon, Cameroon, Nigeria and Benin during the non-breeding season
    • The Damara Tern is a near-endemic breeder to the region
    • It has held special conservation status among Namibian conservation authorities for 25 years and has in recent years become a flagship species of the Namibian coastline
    • Will be classified as a Specially Protected species under the draft Parks and Wildlife Management Bill of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism
  • BREEDING AREAS STUDIED
    • Elizabeth Bay – the main study site
    • Grosse Bucht – outside restricted area and used as a control for foraging
    • Marmora Pan (Pocket Beaches)
    • Anigab Pan (Hottentot’s Bay)
  • Elizabeth Bay
    • FEEDING:
    • Simmons (2005) suggested that the introduction of sediment into the bay has been detrimental to breeding Damara Terns
    • Control area is Grosse Bucht (22km north)
    • Preliminary analysis (Elizabeth Bay, n=91 ; Grosse Bucht, n=70 ) showed no significant difference in foraging success between Grosse Bucht and Elizabeth Bay (χ21 = 1.158, P =0.2819)
    • Further analysis will be completed once sediment discharge data has been received from Elizabeth Bay mine (and a greater sample size at both areas is collected)
  • Adult populations and breeding success
    • During the height of breeding season (mid-December 2007) a minimum of 405 Damara Terns were found in the Sperrgebiet : Hottentot’s Bay ( n=287 ), Marmora Pan ( n=68 ), Elizabeth Bay and surrounds ( n=32 ), Grossebucht ( n=18 )
    • Elizabeth Bay had the smallest nest number (13), Hottentot’s Bay (Anigab Pan) had by far the greatest number of nests (80)
  • Breeding success
    • Nests were deemed successful when chicks fledged
    • Only nests with known fates are shown
  • Egg measurements
    • The mean length and breadth (mm) at Hottentot’s Bay were l=32.58, b=24.16, n=37 , Grossebucht l=33.51, b=24.07, n=26 , Elizabeth Bay l=33.09, b=24.34, n=10 , and Marmora Pan l=33.24, b=23.85, n=50
    • There was no significant difference in egg volume between the different colonies ( F 3,128 =0.63 , P >0.05)
    • Mean volume (ml) was 9.214, SD=0.572 (range 7.590 – 10.812)
  • Chick condition
    • Chick condition is determined by weight related to structural size (length of head+bill) (Jan Veen’s unpublished method)
    • No significant difference between colonies ( F 3,52 =2.1935, P>0.05), this may be due to small sample sizes
    • Hottentots Bay colony lowest mean standardized condition
    • ( -0.502) and Grosse Bucht highest (0.376) indicating possible relationship between condition and distance to sea
  • Key findings
    • Nest number has decreased at Elizabeth Bay, but increased at all other colonies
    • Chick condition was not lowest at Elizabeth Bay
    • There seems to be a trade-off between predation rates and distance to the sea, where in breeding areas closer to foraging sites chicks can be fed more frequently but predation levels are higher, whereas in breeding areas further from foraging sites chicks may not be fed as frequently (and adults may work harder to feed chicks as flying distances between   colonies and feeding areas are much greater), but predation rates are much lower and chicks have a greater chance at survival to fledging
    • More data needs to be collected to analyse breeding success, chick growth rates, foraging success as well as adult condition at different colonies. Thus far there have been no significant differences, apart from the smaller colony size, between the mined area, Elizabeth Bay, and the non-mined sites
  • Acknowledgements
    • Megan Murgatroyd for her help in the collection of data during the past field season
    • Namdeb for their continued support on the project
    • MET, especially Trygve Cooper and MFMR, especially Jean-Paul Roux and Jessica Kemper
    • Animal Demography Unit, Les Underhill and Sue Kuyper (UCT)
    • Percy FitzPatrick Institute, Rob Simmons (UCT)
    • Elizabeth Bay Mine, and especially Urban Burger, Senior Geologist at Namdeb for his support on the project
    • Environmental Unit at Namdeb (Ronel van der Merwe, Ursula Witbooi)