• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
National STEM Resources: A 2014 Bibliography
 

National STEM Resources: A 2014 Bibliography

on

  • 232 views

Julia Cothron maintains an on-going bibliography of national STEM resources as she works with strategic planning and advocacy in Virginia. This 2014 bibliography reflects recent work with STEM ...

Julia Cothron maintains an on-going bibliography of national STEM resources as she works with strategic planning and advocacy in Virginia. This 2014 bibliography reflects recent work with STEM advocacy, assessments and accountability systems, science and literacy skills, mathematics and science curricula, teacher education and workforce skills.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
232
Views on SlideShare
231
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.slideee.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    National STEM Resources: A 2014 Bibliography National STEM Resources: A 2014 Bibliography Document Transcript

    • 1 National STEM Resources: A 2014 Bibliography Prepared by Julia H. Cothron, Ed.D. In her work with strategic planning and advocacy, Dr. Julia Cothron utilizes a variety of national resources and maintains an on-going bibliography of national resources, which she updated in February 2014. Check for additions to Dr.Cothron’s STEM Leader webpage, including this bibliography, as she continues her STEM volunteer and advocacy work. Bibliography Achieve Inc. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards. Auguste, B., Kihn, P. & Miller, M. (2010, September). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. An International and Market Research-Based Perspective. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/closing-the-talent-gap/ Augustine, N., Brock, B. & Romer, R. (2012). A letter on STEM education to America’s parents. Committee on K-12 Education. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of the Presidency & Congress. Retrieved from www.thePresidency.org Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R. R. (editors). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Brewer, E.A. & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2009). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education – A call to action. Final Report of a National Conference organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science with support from the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from www.visionandchange.org. Center for Geoscience Education & Public Understanding. (2013, October). Earth and space sciences education in U.S. secondary schools: Key indicators and trends. Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 2 Earth and Space Sciences Report Number: 1:0. Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute. Retrieved from http://geocntr.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/08/ESS-2013-Status-Report-10-17-13.pdf Center for Geosciences Education & Public Understanding. (2013, September). Education in the Earth and space sciences in U.S. secondary schools: Key indicators and trends. Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute. Retrieved from http://geocntr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ESS-2013-Status-Report-1017-13.pdf Children’s Engineering Educators, LLC. (2014). A website. Harrisonburg, VA: James Madison University. Retrieved from http://www.childrensengineering.com Coble, C.R. (2012). Ten questions university leaders should ask about quality science and mathematics teacher preparation: Implementations strategies from “The Analytic Framework”. APLU/SMTI, Paper 7. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/document.doc?id=4099 Conley, D.T. & Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Creating systems of assessment for deeper learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Retrieved from http://www.epiconline.org. Davies, A., Fidler, D. & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills: 2020. Palo Alto (CA): Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute. SR-1382A. Retrieved from http://www.iftf.org/futureworkskills/. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000, January). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 8(1):144. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392 Ellington, A.J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5): 433-463. Fang, Z., Lamme, L.L. & Pringle, R.M. (2010). Language and literacy in inquiry-based science. Arlington, VA: NSTApress. 150 pages. Friedman, T.L & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). That used to be us: How America fell behind in the world it invented and how we can come back. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 380 pages. Hamilton, L.S. (2011). Testing what has been taught. American Educator, 2010-11 (winter): 47-52. Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 3 Hammerman, E. & Musial, D. (2008). Integrating science with mathematics & literacy. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 177 pages. Hong, J.J. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identify and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (2010): 1530-1543. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X10000831r Institute for the Future. (2007). Sensory transformation: New tools and practices for overcoming cognitive overload. Technology Horizons Programs |SSR-1075. Palo Alto, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.iftf.org/our-work/peopletechnology/technology-horizons/sensory-transformation-overcoming-cognitiveoverload/ Institute for the Future. (2006). Science and technology outlook: 2005 – 2055. Technology Horizons Programs. Palo Alto, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.iftf.org/our-work/people-technology/technology-horizons/sciencetechnology-outlook-2005-2055/ Institute of Education Sciences. (2013, August). Common guidelines for education research and development. A report from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education and the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/pdf/CommonGuidelines.pdf Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics (2014).National assessment of educational progress (NAEP). A website. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/science/ International Technology Education Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy, 3rd edition. Reston, VA: Author. 258 pages. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/TAA/Publications/TAA_Publications.html International Technology Education Association. (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston, VA: Author: 152 pages. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/TAA/Publications/TAA_Publications.html Jayaram, K. Moffit, A. & Scott, D. (2012). Breaking the habit of ineffective professional development for teachers. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/breaking-the-habit-of-ineffective-professionaldevelopment-for-teachers King, K. & Zucker, V. (2008). Curriculum narrowing. Pearson Policy Report. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/tmrs_rg/CurriculumNarrowi ng.pdf?WT.mc_id=TMRS_Curriculum_Narrowing Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 4 Krajcik, J. and Sutherland, L. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328 (5977): 456-459. Laczko-Kerr, I. & Berliner, D.C. (2002, September 6). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/316 LaTurner, R.J. (2002). Teachers’ academic preparation and commitment to teach math and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18 (2002): 653-663. Retrieved http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X02000252 Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts science and technology engineering curriculum framework. Maiden, MA: Author. 156 pages. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf McKinsey & Company, Inc. (2012). Transforming education through mLearning. McKinsey & Company, Inc. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/mEducation_whitepa per_April%201_vFINAL.pdf Monk, D.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review 13 (2): 125145. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X02000252 Mourshed, M., Farrell, D. & Barton, D. (2012). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. McKinsey & Company: McKinsey Center for Government. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/education-to-employment Muller, J. (2013). Authentic assessment tool box. A website. Retrieved from http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/ Museum of Science, Boston. (2014). Engineering is elementary. A website. Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.eie.org/ National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11625 National Center on Education and the Economy. (2013) What does it really mean to be college and work ready? Washington (DC): Author. Retrieved from Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 5 http://www.ncee.org/college-and-work-ready/ National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards (English/language arts). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELALiteracy National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards (mathematics). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math National Reading Panel (2000, April 13). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/pages/smallbook.aspx National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards. Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, James W. Pellegrino, Mark R. Wilson, Judith A. Koenig, and Alexandra S. Beatty, Editors. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nasonline.org/ National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Committee on the Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nasonline.org/ National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nasonline.org/ National Research Council (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 6 Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nasonline.org/ National Research Council. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century school. A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32688/ National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12882 National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 272 pages. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962 National Science Board. (2014, February). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: Science Foundation (NSB 14-01). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/?org=NSF National Science Board. (2014, February). Science and engineering indicators: 2014 Digest. Arlington, VA: Science Foundation (NSB 14-02). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/digest?org=NSF National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304. Arlington, VA: Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_digest.pdf Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L. & Wise, L. (2008). Questions, claims and evidence. Arlington, VA; NSTApress. 182 pages. National Science Board. (2009, Jan 11). STEM education recommendations for the president-elect Obama administration (NSB-09-1). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2009/01_10_stem_rec_obama.pdf National Science Teachers Association (2013). NSTA position paper on NGSS. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/ngss.aspx. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Programme for international student assessment (PISA). A website. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 7 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). The road to 21st century learning: A policy makers’ guide to 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/resources Pearson, P.D., Moje, E. & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science 328 (5977): 459-63. A paper presented at The National Academies Literacy for Science Workshop, December 9-10, 2013. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/CurrentProjects/DBASSE_08 3999. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. A Report to the President. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-toexcel-final_feb.pd Presley, J.B. & Coble, J.B. (2012). Seeking consensus on the essential attributes of quality mathematics and science teacher preparation programs. APLU/SMTI, Paper 6. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/document.doc?id=4098 Reading Rockets. (2014). Federal reports on reading issues. Washington, DC: WETA Public Broadcasting. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/research/federal Romance, N.R. & Vitale, M.R. (2013). Science IDEAS: Integrating reading/language arts within science instruction across grades K-5. A paper presented at The National Academies Literacy for Science Workshop, December 9-10, 2013. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/CurrentProjects/DBASSE_08 3999. Romance, N.R. & Vitale, M.R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4): 373-404. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500690116738#.UvOq52CYZes Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 8 Sampson, V., Enderle, P. & Grooms, J. (2013, summer). Argumentation in science education: Helping students understand the nature of scientific argumentation so they can meet the new science standards. The Science Teacher, p. 30-33. Retrieved from http://learningcenter.nsta.org/files/tst1305_30.pdf Sampson, V. and Schleigh, S. (2012). Scientific argumentation in biology: 30 classroom activities. Arlington, VA: NSTA press. Sawchuck. S. (2011, June 7). What studies say about teacher effectiveness. EWA Research Brief. The National Education Writers Association. Retrieved from http://www.ewa.org/report/what-studies-say-about-effectiveness-teachers Scott, E.C. & Branch, G. ((2003, October). Evolution: what’s wrong with “teaching the controversy”. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 18(10): 499-502. Shields, T. & Waid. K. (2013, June 22). Educational attainment and community leadership in Virginia PreK-12 Education: 2013 and beyond. A paper presented at the Virginia Leadership Summit 2013: Shaping the Future for Virginia. Richmond, VA: University of Richmond. Retrieved from http://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=white-papers Southeast Comprehensive Center (2012). Engaging diverse learners through the provision of STEM education opportunities. A briefing paper. Metairie, LA: Author. Retrieved from http://secc.sedl.org Staker, J, Norton-Meier, L. & Hand, B. (2012, December 7). Questions, claims, and evidence: The important place of argumentation in science writing. A slide presentation from an NSTA Web Seminar. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. Retrieved from http://learningcenter.nsta.org/products/symposia_seminars/NSTA/files/Questions ClaimsandEvidence_12-17-2012.pdf Sterling, D. (Coordinating Editor). (2013). Scientific inquiry and the nature of science. A special issue. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 13 (2013). Retrieved from http://www.math.vcu.edu/g1/journal/IssuesOnline.html#13 The Alliance for Science & Technology Research in America (2013). Innovation vital signs: Virginia’s federal R&D and STEM jobs report 2013. Retrieved from http://www.stemconnector.org/sites/default/files/sbs/CVD2013VirginiaInnovation. pdf Virginia Mathematics & Science Coalition Task Force. (2010). Scientific inquiry and the nature of science task force report. A whitepaper. Retrieved from http://www.vamsc.org/whitepapers.html Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International
    • 9 Vitale, M.R. & Romance, N.R. (2012). Using in-depth science instruction to accelerate student achievement in science and reading comprehension in grades 1 - 2. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10 (2012): 457-472. Vitale, M.R. & Romance, N.R. (2011, November). Adaptation of knowledge-based instructional intervention to accelerate student learning in science and early literacy in grades 1 and 2. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 79-93. Vitale, M. R. & Romance, N.R. (2009). A research-based model for integrating elementary science and reading comprehension: Implications for research and practice. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. What have we learned symposium (2010). A special issue. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 12 (2010). Retrieved from http://www.math.vcu.edu/g1/journal/IssuesOnline.html#12 Wheeler-Toppen, J. (2011). Science the “write” way. Arlington, VA: NSTApress. 291 pages. Julia Cothron (2/17/2014) Published under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International