Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Coja statement on_appointments
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Coja statement on_appointments

52

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
52
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 66 Lawyers Chambers Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Members: Ram Jethmalani Shanti Bhushan Fali Nariman Rajinder Sachar D.S. Tewatia Anil B. Divan Indira Jaisingh Kamini Jaiswal Prashant Bhushan Arvind K. Nigam STATEMENTWe note that for the second time in quick succession, therecommendations of the collegium for the appointment of judges to theSupreme Court have been returned by the Government. In JusticeDinakaran’s case, some of the allegations against him have beensubsequently been confirmed by the District Magistrate, leading to animpeachment motion against him which has been admitted by theChairman of the Rajya Sabha.We are disturbed that recommendations have been made without anytransparency and without proper verification of the antecedents &reputation of those recommended.The committee strongly feels that responsible members of the bar of theconcerned High Courts should be consulted before the collegium makesany recommendation to the Government. Pending the constitution of a fulltime National Judicial Appointments Commission, we urge the SCcollegium to: a) Fashion after public debate, an open, accountable and participatory procedure for making recommendations for judicial appointments; and b) Not to recommend persons for appointment until the names have been made public, and members of the bar & public are enabled to share the relevant information that they might have about the proposed appointees with the collegium.

×