Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida

on

  • 304 views

Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida

Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida

Statistics

Views

Total Views
304
Views on SlideShare
304
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida Cofactores virales en el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida Document Transcript

    • Reviews in MEDICALVIROLOGY VOL. 2: 29-34 (1992) 29 Viral Cofactors in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Alison Webster Department of Virology. Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London NW3, UK INTRODUCTION Symptomatic immunodeficiency does not usually occur until several years after infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), although the length o this time f interval is subject to considerable individual variation. This can be explained to some extent by the life cycle of HIV within an infected cell: reverse transcription of viral RNA is followed by integration of the proviral DNA into the host cell genome, in which form the virus may remain latent for prolonged periods. Subsequent activation of the virus results in lysis of the infected CD4 lymphocyte and release of infectious virions. Symptoms of AIDS might also be caused by the dissemination of HIV to cell populations other than CD4 lymphocytes. In an infected individual markers of HIV disease progression, such as loss of CD4 lymphocytes and the presence of HIV viraemia suggest that the disease processes commence at the time of HIV seroconversion. The rate at which these processes occur may determine the interval at which AIDS develops, and potentially could be modulated by the effects of a cofactor virus defined as one which hastens the onset of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).A viral cofactor may not be essential for the development of AIDS, since AIDS is probably the inevitable consequence of HIV infection, although for some individuals, the time taken to develop AIDS may exceed their natural life span. The acquisition of HIV itself may be enhanced by other viral infections, such as genital ulceration due to herpes simplex virus. Once AIDS has supervened, other viruses may play an opportunist role in the development of lifethreatening infections or neoplasms. The scope of this review is limited to consideration of the progression from asymptomatic HIV infection to AIDS, and the role that other viruses, acting as cofactors in conjunction with HIV, may play in this process. In practical terms, identification of viral cofactors is extremely important, since abrogation of their effects, even if it extends the disease-free interval by I to 2 years, may offer a worthwhile benefit to the patient, equivalent to any currently available antiretroviral therapy. Laboratory studies have suggested many potential mechanisms by which heterologous viruses may accelerate HIV disease, which are discussed below. ISSN I052-92 76/92/010029-06 $05.OO 0 1992 by John Wiley & Sons,Ltd. INTERACTIONS AT THE MOLECULAR LEVEL Transcription of the HIV proviral DNA is under the control of regulatory elements located in the long terminal repeat (LTR). Both viral and cellular proteins interact with sequences in this region to modulate expression of the genome. These include the HIV trans-acting protein (tat), and several cellular transcriptional factors such as NFKB, SP-I and LBP-I. The ability of various heterologous viral proteins to transactivate the HIV LTR has been studied by many groups using cells cotransfected with plasmids containing the HIVI LTR linked to the reporter gene chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT),and plasmids containing the viral gene of interest. Alternatively, cell lines chronically infected with the heterologous virus have been transfected with the HIV LTR-CAT construct. Herpes simplex virus (HSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus-6 (HHVd), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), papovaviruses, hepatitis B virus (HBV), human T cell leukaemia virus (HTLV) type I and adenoviruses’-’ have all been reported to transactivate the HIV LTR under these conditions. Interest has focused on identifying the particular viral proteins involved, and the HIV sequences with which they interact. Transactivation by heterologous viruses appears to be independent of the interaction between HIV tat and its response element, tar. The HBV x gene and HTLV-1 tax gene products have been identified as transactivators of the HIV LTR, and the immediate early (IE) gene products of the herpesviruses have been shown to mediate this effect, but there is some disagreement as to precisely which herpesvirus genes are responsible. The fact that nonproductive herpesvirus infection may be sufficient to stimulate HIV gene expression is worth noting. The precise mechanism of transactivation is unclear; it may result directly from binding of the viral protein to the HIV LTR, or indirectly from the interaction of the viral protein with cellular transcription factors (see Figure I). Binding sites for several cellular transcription factors have been identified on the HIV LTR. Recent studies have suggested that the relative abilities of HIV tat, and two CMV IE genes to transactivate the HIV LTR are highly dependent upon the cell system underlining the importance of cellular transcription factors. Interaction Accepted 29 June 1991
    • A. WEBSTER Monocyte Cytokine eg TNF-a Cofactor viral antigen r 1 HIVLTR 4 Transcription * Figure 1.Transactivationof the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR).Possible mechanismsof interaction between extracellular o intracellularcofactor r virus, and the HIV LTR, resulting in stimulation of HIV gene expression. with the binding site for the cellular transcription factor, NFKBmay be a common pathway in transactivation of the HIV LTR by HHV-6, HSV and HBV.’&’’ Molecular interaction between HIV and cofactor viruses may be a two way process. Upregulation of a cofactor virus by HIV may be a mechanism by which opportunistic viral infections develop, independently of a decline in immune surveillance. This reciprocal enhancement of viral expression has been demonstrated in vitro for CMV’3*’4 and the papovavirus JC,I5 but not for HSV.I6 For such direct molecular interactions to occur in vivo, it is necessary that both viruses are present within the same cell. This may occur coincidentally for some viruses, especially the lymphotropic viruses such as HHV-6 and HTLVs, but specific mechanisms may facilitate dual infection (see below). However, the extent to which coinfection occurs in vivo is unclear. The results of cotransfection experiments should be interpreted with caution, however, since this artificial system may not predict the result of coinfection in vih-o or in viva. Both CMV and HSV increase the expression of HIV in dually infected cells,” and CMV enhances lysis” of T lymphoblasts infected with HIV. Conflicting results have been reported for HHV-6 since different groups have found an increase3 or decrease” in HIV replication in dually infected cells. INTERACTIONS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL Upregulation of HIV gene expression by cellular transcription factors may also be brought about by external stimuli such as mitogens or cytokines. Stimulation of HIV infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)by inactivated HTLV-1 has been shown to increase HIV expression,” and HIV expression in a chronically infected T-cell line” can be increased by the cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a).Production o cytokines can be stimulated by viral f infections, so providing an alternative mechanism by which viruses upregulate HIV (see Figure I), and this has been investigated in u i h . Soluble mediators, identified as TNF-a, produced by PBMC following challenge with inactivated viral antigens, are capable of upregulating HIV expression in chronically infected T-cell lines.” Cells stimulated with CMV, EBV or HIV produced cytokines which upregulated HIV; in contrast, challenge with HSV-I, HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, HHV-6, vaccinia or HBV was ineffective in this In addition to these interactions, mediated via the stimulation of HIV gene expression, the presence of cofactor viruses may facilitate the progression of HIV disease by other specific and nonspecific mechanisms. One specific mechanism might be the enhancement of cellular tropism, so allowing HIV to penetrate cells which do not express CD4, for example within the central nervous system, where it may cause local pathology. Cofactor-enhanced uptake of HIV may also increase the opportunity for direct molecular interaction between the two viruses by increasing the frequency of dually infected cells. Infection and transformation of cord-blood B lymphocytes by EBV has been shown to render these cells susceptible to HIV infect i ~ n . ’ ~is known that antibody-coated HIV is able to gain It entry into cells via the receptor for the Fc component of IgG on the cell ~urface.’~ herpesviruses CMV and HSV The induce the expression of these receptors on the surface of infected cells, which could then be exploited by HIV (see Figure 2a). This possibility has been demonstrated in vitro: it has been shown that antibody-coated HIV can be taken up into CMV-infected fibroblasts, cells which lack CD4 expression, and which are not normally permissive for HIV? HIV uptake may also be facilitated by infection with a cofactor virus through the induction of transcription of the cellular gene encoding the HIV receptor, the CD4 molecule (see Figure 2b). Expression of the CD4 molecule has been shown to occur in mature CD8+CD4- lymphocytes following HHV-6 infection, so rendering the cells susceptible to infection with HIV.” In contrast, cells infected with CMV or HSV in this system did not behave in the same way. Phenotypic mixing of HIV with other viruses may result in the formation of pseudotypes with altered target cell tropism. Incorporation of additional viral proteins into the HIV envelope could allow HIV to exploit a wider range of host cell receptors (see Figure 2c). Pseudotypes have been reported to occur in T-cell lines coinfected with HTLV-1 and HIV,” with progeny virus able to penetrate into various cells lacking CD4, and also in T-cell lines coinfected with HIV and HSV.29 Nonspecific mechanisms of interaction might include the recruitment and activation of HIV-infected cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage in response to an active infection with a cofactor virus, so increasing dissemination of HIV. Differentiation from monocyte to macrophage, as part of the immune response, may be a prerequisite for activation of latent HIV within these cells. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES Epidemiological studies have not satisfactorily confirmed or refuted the clinical relevance of the experimental results
    • VIRAL COFACTORS IN AIDS Cofactor virus 31 k + Cofactor k 4 Cofact0r virus infected cell Cofactor virus infected cell Uptake antibody Cofactor virus Ifr HIV + -SU PseudotvDe containing HIV genome Uptake Figure 2. Possible mechanisms by which HIV host cell range may be expanded. (a) Cofactor virus infection may induce expression of receptors for Fc com onent of IgG (FcR)on cell surface, so enabling uptake of antibody-coated HIV. (b) Cofactor virus infection may induce expression orthe CD4 molecule, the receptor for HIV gp120 on the cell surface, which may then mediate uptake of HIV. (c) Phenotypic mixing of cofactor virus and HIV may result in an HIV pseudotype expressing cofactor viral proteins.HIV may then exploit cofactor virus-receptor interactions. described above, and it is useful to spend a few moments considering why this might be so. The prolonged period to development of AIDS demands that patients must be followed for many years from the time of HIV seroconversion; merely documenting an association between a particular measure of viral infection and the severity of HIV disease in a cross-sectional study cannot be taken as proof o a causative role. Even when groups are followed f prospectively, results may be inconclusive. Other host factors, including a e?' genetic background?' and continuing drug abuse!' have been identified as important variables in determining the time to onset of AIDS, and failure to account for these may confound the analysis of a cofactor effect. Other factors, relating to patient lifestyle, underlying diseases, and route and quantity of HIV inoculum may also affect the progression of AIDS. This latter factor is especially important where HIV and a putative f cofactor share routes o transmission, since the presence of a cofactor may simply reflect an increased exposure to HIV itself. This may to some extent preclude extrapolation from studies undertaken in particular risk groups or geographical areas to the HIV-infected population in general. Few studies have been undertaken in heterosexuals, yet it is this group that is likely to occupy our attention in future. Herpesviruses The herpesvimses are ubiquitous amongst the general population, and HIV infection therefore frequently occurs against a background of herpesvirus infection. Their role as cofactors in AIDS, particularly the lymphotropic herpesviruses CMV and HHV-6, has been investigated in various HIV risk groups. Infection with these viruses has generally been diagnosed on the basis of serological studies. Human herpesvirus-6 HHV-6 has been isolated from T and B lymphocytes, and infection is common amongst the general population, being acquired during the first few years of life. Antibodies to HHV-6 are generally detected by immunofluorescence, which is a subjective technique, and prevalence rates are to some extent arbitrarily determined by the cut-off titre chosen. The possible influence of HHV-6 on progression to AIDS has been analysed in a group of homosexual men with lymphadenopathy, whose dates of HIV seroconversion were not known, 66% of whom were reported to be seropositive for HHV-6.33Over a period of 5 years, 30% of patients developed AIDS; no association was found between HHV-6 and disease progression. However, it is not clear whether the serological criterion chosen is a true reflection of HHV-6 infection, since prevalence rates higher
    • ~~ ~ A. WEBSTER 32 than this have been reported to occur in the general population. Epidemiological studies to elucidate the role o f HHV-6 are likely to be difficult because of its very high prevalence. Cytomegalovirus lation of blood donors and blood or blood product recipients whose dates of HIV seroconversion were unknown.37 The proportion of HIV-infected homosexuals who have elevated IgA antibody titres to EBV virus capsid antigen increases with the stage of HIV di~ease,~’ this may but be a consequence, rather than a cause, of progressive HIV infection. There is some circumstantial evidence that suppression of herpesviruses might have a beneficial effect in HIV infected patients. In a small placebo-controlled trial, therapy with high dose acyclovir has been shown to improve some markers of HIV disease rogression in patients 9 with asymptomatic HIV infection.4 CMV is found in 50-60% of adults from developed countries, but is even more prevalent amongst certain groups because of their high-risk sexual behaviour. For this reason, the cofactor effect of CMV cannot be studied in HIV-infected homosexuals since CMV infection is virtually universal in this group. Furthermore, because both viruses are transmitted via the same route, an absence of CMV may merely reflect a lower HIV inoculum. Human T-cell leukaemia viruses We have reported the adverse effect of CMV serostatus The HTLVs are infrequently found within the general on the progression of HIV disease on a cohort of HIV population in the western world, but are endemic in Japan infected haemophiliacs, a population with a CMV preand the Caribbean. These viruses are tropic for T cells, and valence of 54%. CMV is not transmitted by clotting factor share certain routes o transmission with HIV, and are thus f concentrates, and is therefore not a marker of increased exposure to HIV in this group.34Further follow-up (for a found in certain risk groups for HIV, such as i.v. drug abusers (IVDA). Their role as potential cofactors for AIDS f median o 8.3 years) confirms that CMV-positive patients has been investigated in IVDA and in homosexuals in are significantly more likely to have progressed to AIDS, the Caribbean. Serological methods are generally unable compared with CMV-negative patients, after controlling to distinguish between infections with HTLV-I or 2, so for age. This study attempted to address the difficulties epidemiological studies have considered both viruses outlined in the introduction to this section. Other groups together. who have not reached the same conclusions, have been less rigorous in their approach. Two studies in IVDA in the USA report an association A small study of HIV-infected haemophiliacs failed to between HTLV seropositivity and severity of HIV disease. find an association between CMV status and the developLee ef al. report4’ that 15%of HIV infected IVDA are also ment of symptoms of HIV infecti0n.3~However, this infected with HTLV. Dually infected subjects were significategory included patients with generalised lymphadencantly more likely to have fever or weight loss, compared opathy, a condition which does not carry prognostic sigwith those infected with HIV alone. However, the nonnificance. Two other longitudinal studies have also failed to specific nature of these symptoms, the possible shared find a relationship between CMV serostatus and prof f route o transmission, the lack o knowledge of the length gression to AIDS; one in HIV-infected haemophiliac~,~~ of HIV seropositivity and the variation in prevalence of and another in a diverse population of blood donors and both viruses in different age groups prevent us from drawrecipients of blood or blood pr0ducts.3~ The dates of HIV ing many conclusions from this study. Page ef al. report4’ a seroconversion were unknown for most of these indiprospective study of HIV-infected IVDA, 21% of whom viduals, and few of their patients developed a measurable were also infected with HTLV. After a follow-up of about 2 end-point during the study period. Differences in the study years, mortality from AIDS was significantly higher in design prevent comparisons being made between these dually infected patients (35% vs 12%) after controlling for reports. age and injecting frequency. These results are certainly A study of a small number of infants perinatally exposed suggestive of a cofactor role for HTLV 112 in AIDS, but a to HIV suggests that infants infected with CMV and HIV more detailed study in patients with known dates of HIV have a worse prognosis, as reflected in AIDS mortality, than seroconversion is required. those infected with HIV alone.38Interaction between CMV A study of a small number of HIV-infected homosexuals and HIV may occur in the mother, with transmission of a in Trinidad reveals that dually infected individuals are more higher HIV inoculum to her offspring, or within the infant. likely to have HIV disease, but this re ort suffers from the However, the possibility cannot be excluded that mothers limitations of a cross-sectional study.4 P who have more advanced HIV disease for whatever reason HTLVs might prove to be important cofactors in these are more likely to reactivate and transmit CMV, and so give populations, but are unlikely to have any major impact birth to infants who have a worse prognosis because they f f in patients in the western world because o the rarity o have received a larger inoculum of HIV. infection with these viruses. Epstein-Barr virus Hepatitis B virus Evidence in support o a role for EBV in HIV disease prof gression is lacking. Lang and colleagues report no association between EBV seropositivity (as measured by IgC antibodies against virus capsid antigen) and progression to f AIDS over a study period o up to 32 months in a popu- HBV is transmitted by the same routes as HIV, and this virus is therefore prevalent amongst certain unvaccinated HIV risk groups. Solomon ef al. report a study of HIVinfected homosexuals followed for a period o 2.5 years.44 f The presence of serological markers for HBV was not
    • VIRAL COFACTORS IN AIDS related to progression to AIDS in this group, although the date of HIV seroconversion was not known for these individuals. 33 6. CONCLUSIONS The topic of viral cofactors in AIDS is highly controversial. Other variables, such as age and genetic background, may modulate the size of any cofactor effect in a given study population, as will the prevalence of the virus in that population. As yet no consensus has emerged on the effects of any virus on progression to AIDS. Evidence in favour of, or against, a particular virus acting as a cofactor can be found in the experiments outlined above. The discrepant laboratory results may be partly explained by differences in the experimental cell system chosen, since it is becoming increasingly clear that molecular interactions are to some extent dependent upon host cell mediators. Identification of viral cofactors is undertaken with the aim of prolonging the interval between HIV infection and AIDS by suppressing their effects with antiviral agents. This could conceivably be achieved with active or passive immunoprophylaxis, or with antiviral agents. Vaccines are likely to be useful tools in preventing cofactor infection only as part of a general vaccination policy, since these infections are often acquired in early life. However, vaccines may potentially modulate the effects of prior infection, for example by suppressing active infection. Antiviral agents, such as high dose acyclovir, may be useful in lessening the effect ofacofactor, by inhibiting viral replication.The taskof f establishing the precise mechanisms o interaction between cofactor viruses and HIV thus takes on extra importance, so that the molecular targets for antiviral agents can be identified. For example, the development of agents which interfere with transcriptional factors might be effective in suppressing the effects of latent cofactor infections. REFERENCES 1. Gendelman, H. E., Phelps, W., Feigenbaum, L. et al. (1986). Transactivation of the human immuno- deficiency virus long terminal repeat sequence by DNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 9759-9763. 2. Davis, M., Kenney, S. C., Kamine, J., Pagano, J. S. and Huang, E. S. (1987). Immediate-early gene region of human cytomegalovirus trans-activates the promoter of human immunodeficiencyvirus. Proc. NaB Acad. Sci. USA, 84,8642-8646. 3. Lusso, P., Ensoli, B., Markham, P. D. et ul. (1989).Productive dual infection of human CD4+ T lymphocytes by HIV-1 and HHV-6. Nature, 337,370-373. 4. Kenney, S., Kamine, J., Markovitz, D., Fenrick, R. and Pagano, J. (1988). An Epstein-Barr virus immediate early gene product trans-activates gene expression from the human immunodeficiencyvirus long terminal repeat. F’roc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1652-1656. 5. Siddiqui, A., Gaynor, R., Srinivasan,A., Mapoles, J.and Farr, R. W. (1989).Trans-activation of viral enhancers including the long terminal repeat of the human 7. 8. 9. immunodeficiency virus by the hepatitis B virus X protein. Virology, 169,479-484. Siekevitz, M., Josephs, S. F., Dukovitch, M., Peffer, N., Wong-Staal, F. and Greene, W. C. (1987).Activation of the HIV-1 LTR by T cell mitogens and the transactivator protein of HTLV 1.Science, 238, 1575-1578. Rice, A. B. and Matthews, M. B. (1988). Transactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat sequences, expressed in an adenovirus vector, by the adenovirus ElA 13s protein. Proc. Natl. Acud. Sci. USA, 85,4200-4204. Rando, R. F., Srinivasan, A., Feingold, J., Gonczol, E. and Plotkin, S. (1990). Characterization of multiple molecular interactions between human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1(HIV-1). Virology, 176,87-97. Barry, PA, Pratt-Lowe, E., Unger, R. E. and Luciw, P. A. (1991). Cellular factors regulate transactivation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. I. Virol., 65, 1392-1399. 10. Ensoli, B., Lusso, P., Schachter, F. et al. (1989).Human herpes virus-6 increases HIV-I expression incoinfected T cells via nuclear factors binding to the HIV-1 enhancer. EMBO]., 8,3019-3027. 11. Gimble, J.M., Duh, E., Ostrove, J.M., Gendelman, H. E., Max, E. E. and Rabson, A. B. (1988).Activation of the human immunodeficiencyvirus long terminal repeat by herpes simplex virus type 1 is associated with induction of a nuclear factor that binds to the NF-kappa B/ core enhancer sequence. ] Virol., 62,4104-4112. . 12. Twu, J. S., Chu, K. and Robinson, W. S. (1989).Hepatitis B virus X gene activates kappa B-like enhancer sequences in the long terminal repeat of human immunodeficiency virus 1. Proc. Nutl. Acud. Sci. USA., 86,5168-5172. 13. Skolnik, P. R., Kosloff, B. R. and Hirsch, M. S. (1988). Bidirectional interactions between human immunodeficiency virus type 1and cytomegalovirus. ] Infect. . Dis., 1 5 7, 508-5 14. 14. Ho, W. Z., Harouse, J. M., Rando, R. F., Gonczol, E., Srinivasan, A. and Plotkin, S. A. (1990). Reciprocal enhancement of gene expression and viral replication between human cytomegalovirus and human immuno. deficiency virus type I.] Gen. Virol., 71,97-103. 15. Tada, H., Rappaport, J., Lashgari, M., Amini, S., WongStaal,F. and Khalili,K. (1990).Trans-activation fo the JC virus late promotor by the tat protein of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus in glial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87,3479-3483. 16. Rando, R. E., Pellett, P. E., Luciw, P. A., Bohan, C. A. and Srinivasan, (1987).Transactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus by herpesvirus. Oncogene, 1, 13-18. 17. Tremblay, M., Gomitsky, M. and Wainberg, M. A. (1989).Active replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by peripheral blood mononuclear cells following coincubation with herpesviruses. 1. Med. Viral., 29, 109-114. 18. Casareale, D., Fiala, M., Chang, C. M., Cone, L. A. and Mocarski, E. S. (1989). Cytomegalovirus enhances
    • A. WEBSTER 34 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. lysis of HIV-infected T lymphoblasts. Int. ]. Cancer, 44, 124-130. Canigan, D. R., Knox, K. K. and Tapper, M. A. (1990). Suppression o human immunodeficiency virus type 1 f replication by human herpesvirus-6. ]. Infect. D s , 6 2 , i .1 844-85 1. Zack, J. A., Cann, A. J., Lugo, J. P. and Chen, I. S. (1988). HIV-I production from infected peripheral blood T cells after HTLV-1 induced mitogenic stimulation. Science, 240,1026-1029. Folks, T. M., Justement, J., Kinter, A., Dinarello, C. A. and Fauci, A. S. (1987). Cytokine-induced expression of HIVl in a chronically infected promonocytic cell line. Science, 238, 800-802. Clouse, K. A., Powell, D., Washington, I. et al. (1989). Monokine regulation of human immunodeficiency virus-I expression in a chronically infected human T cell clone. ] Immunol., 142,431-438. . Clouse, K. A., Robbins, P. B., Femie, B., Ostrove, J. M. and Fauci, A. S. (1989).Viral antigen stimulation of the production of human monokines capable of regulating HIVl expression. ]. Immunol., 143,470-475. Pagano, J. S., Kenney, S., Markovitz, D. and Kamine, J. (1988).Epstein Barr virus and interactions with human retroviruses. ] Virol. Methods, 21,229-239. . Takeda, A., Tuazon, C. U. and Ennis, F. A. (1988). Antibody-enhanced infection by HIV-1 via Fc receptor-mediated entry. Science, 242,580-583. McKeating, J. A. & Griffiths, P. D. and Weiss, R. A. (1990). HIV susceptibility conferred to human fibroblasts by cytomegalovirus-induced Fc receptor. Nature, 343, 659-661. Lusso, P., DeMaria, A., Malnati, M. et al. (1991). Induction of CD4 and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection in human CD8 T lymphocytes by human herpesvirus 6. Nature, 349,533-535. Lusso, P., Lori, F. and Gallo, R. C. (1990). CD4independent infection by human immunodeficiency virus type I after phenotypic mixing with human T cell leukaemia viruses. ]. Virol., 64,6341-6344. Zhu, Z., Chen, S. S. L. and Huang, A. S. (1990). Phenotypic mixing between human immunodeficiency virus and vesicular stomatitis virus or herpes simplex virus. ]. AIDS, 3,215-219. Goedert, J. J., Kessler, C. M., Aledort, L. M. etal. (1989). A prospective study of human immunodeficiency virus type I infection and the development of AIDS in people with haemophilia. N. Engl. ]. Med., 321, 1121-1 148. Steel, C. M., Ludlam, C. A., Beatson, D. et al. (1988). HLA haplotype A1 B8 DR3 as a risk factor for HIVrelated disease. Lancet, i, 1185-1188. Weber, R., Ledergerber, B., Opravil, M., Siegenthaler, W. and Luthy, R. (1990). Progression of HIV infection in misusers o injected drugs who stop injecting or f + 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. follow a programme of maintenance treatment with methadone. Br. Med. J., 301,2-5. Spira, T. J., Bozeman, L. H., Sanderlin,K. C. et al. (1990). Lack of correlation between human herpesvirus-6 infection and the course of human immunodeficiency virus infection. ] Infect. Dis., 161,567-570. . Webster, A., Lee, C. A., Cook, D. G. et al. (1989). Cytomegalovirus infection and progression towards AIDS in haemophiliacs with human immunodeficiency virus. Lancet, ii, 63-66. Jackson, J. B., Erice, A., Englund, J. A., Edson, J. R. and Balfour, H. H. (1988). Prevalence of cytomegalovirus antibody in hemophiliacs and homosexuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Transfusion, 28, 187-189. Becherer, P. R., Smiley, M. L., Matthews, T. J., Weinhold, K. J., McMillan, C. W. and White, G. C. (1990). Human immunodeficiency virus- I disease progression in hemophiliacs. Am. ] Hematol., 34(3), . 204-209. Lang, D. J., Kovacs, A. A., Zaia, J. A. e l al. (1989). Seroepidemiologic studies o cytomegalovirus and f Epstein-Barr virus infections in relation to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in selected recipient populations. J. AIDS, 2,540-549. Frenkel, L. D., Gaur, S., Tsolia, M., Scudder, R., Howell, R. and Kesarwala, H. (1990). Cytomegalovirus infection in children with AIDS. Rev. Infect. Ds., Suppl7, 12 s820-826. Margalith, M., Sarov, B., Sarov, I. et al. (1990). Serum IgC and IgA antibodies specific to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in a longitudinal study of human immunodeficiency virus infection and disease progression in homosexual men. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses, 6, 607-616. Chavanet, P., Malet, J., Waldner, A. et al. (1990). A double blind randomized placebo trial on very high doses of acyclovir in weakly symptomatic HIVpatients. Cancer Detect. Prev., 14, 669-673. Lee, H. A., Weiss, S. H., Brown, L. S. et al. (1990). Patterns of HIV-1 and HTLV-1/11 in intravenous drug abusers from the middle atlantic and central regions o f the USA.]. Infect. D s , i . 162,347-352. Page, J. B., Lai, S., Chitwood, D. D., Klimas, N. G., Smith, P. C. and Fletcher, M. A. (1990). HTLV-1/11 seropositivity and death from AIDS among HIV-1 seropositive intravenous drug users. Lancet, i, 1439-1441. Bartholomew, C., Blattner, W. and Cleghom, F. (1987). Progression to AIDS in homosexual men co-infected with HIV and HTLV-I in Trinidad. Lancet, 2, 1469. Solomon, R. E., Van Raden, M.. Kaslow, R. A. et al. (1990). Association of hepatitis B surface antigen and core antibody with acquisition and manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV 1) infection. Am. ] Public Health, 80, 1475-1478. .